ACADEMIC POLICY - 2022 EDITION

251

1. OBJEKTIF
Prosedur ini disediakan bertujuan untuk membantu pensyarah meningkatkan prestasi
terutamanya bagi mereka yang memperolehi skor kurang daripada 60% dalam penilaian
prestasi pensyarah atau ‘Key Performance Index’ (KPI) dan juga skor kurang dari 60% bagi
penilaian pensyarah dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PNP)

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini digunapakai oleh Pengurusan Akademik untuk memastikan peningkatan
prestasi pensyarah dapat dijalankan dengan baik.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO RUJUKAN
BILIK PENOLONG NAIB -TIADA-
NAMA DOKUMEN CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
1. Buku Peraturan Akademik WUC BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
2. Prosedur Penilaian Prestasi Staf
Akademik BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
3. Prosedur Penilaian Pembelajaran
dan Pengajaran

4. DEFINISI Ketua fakulti yang dilantik oleh Naib Cancelor Kolej Universiti
Dekan Fakulti • Mereka yang bertanggungjawab menilai prestasi pensyarah
Jawatankuasa • Pensyarah berpengalaman yang dilantik oleh Dekan
Penilai

Penyelaras Staf Akademik yang telah dilantik oleh Dekan untuk menyelia
Program tadbir program yang dikendalikan.

Pensyarah Mereka yang mengendalikan kuliah bagi kursus yang ditetapkan
termasuk yang bertaraf tetap, kontrak atau sambilan.

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR Tanggungjawab
Tindakan

1. Penilaian prestasi staf akademik tahunan (Penilaian tahunan Jawatankuasa
pensyarah) Penilai
• Merekod dan mengenalpasti pensyarah yang
memperolehi skor di bawah 60%

2. Penilaian pengajaran dan pembelajaran (Penilaian pensyarah bagi
setiap semester)
• Merekod dan mengenalpasti pensyarah yang
memperolehi skor di bawah 60%

3. Dekan fakulti mengenalpasti pensyarah yang perlu menjalani
kursus dan latihan intensif berdasarkan keputusan penilaian Dekan Fakulti

252

prestasi pensyarah (KPI) dan penilaian pengajaran dan
pembelajaran (PNP) oleh jawatankuasa penilai.

4. Dekan mengenalpasti bahagian yang perlu ditingkatkan
berdasarkan markah penilaian prestasi pensyarah (KPI) dan
penilaian pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PNP) serta melalui
perbincangan dan temubual bersama penyelaras program.

5. Penyelaras program berbincang bersama pensyarah dan

seterusnya mencadangkan latihan serta kursus intensif yang perlu Dekan Fakulti/

dihadiri oleh kumpulan pensyarah berkenaan Ketua Program

6. Pensyarah menjalani latihan dan kursus intensif pada masa yang Pensyarah
ditetapkan
7. Pemantauan prestasi dari semasa ke semasa Penyelaras
Program
8. Tindakan susulan:
Menganjurkan aktiviti berbentuk seminar, bengkel atau kursus Dekan Fakulti
pengajaran bagi meningkatkan prestasi pensyarah yang terlibat.

9. Menghadiri aktiviti yang dianjurkan oleh pihak pengurusan Pensyarah
mengikut ketetapan yang telah diberikan.

10. Maklumbalas dari pensyarah mengenai aktiviti yang dihadiri. Pensyarah

6. LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN NO RUJUKAN
Lampiran 1
BIL PERKARA
1. Carta Alir Prosedur Peningkatan Prestasi

Pensyarah

253

SECTION 09 (XX): ATTENDING COURSE REPORT - SOP

Attending Course Report

PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

LAPORAN MENGHADIRI NO. PINDAAN : 00
: 9 JULAI 2012
JABATAN KURSUS TARIKH KUATKUASA :1
AKADEMIK

MUKASURAT

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan
oleh
Tandatangan MUSLINA BT HJ. MD
MUIS PN. SITI MASRINA BT
Nama SUHANA BT SULONG
Jawatan BAHARUDIN KETUA AUDIT
Tarikh SETIAUSAHA AUDIT DALAMAN AKADEMIK PENOLONG NAIB
DALAMANAKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
22 JUN 2012
5 MEI 2012 27 JUN 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan
dokumen inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

Tarikh No. HALAMAN DIPINDA Tarikh
Pindaan No. Muka surat Ringkasan Pindaan Diluluskan
Para

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

254

1. OBJEKTIF
Prosedur ini disediakan bertujuan untuk menerangkan proses penyediaan laporan
menghadiri kerja luar bagi mendapat maklumat terkini mengenai perjalanan kursus,kaedah
pengajaran dan pembelajaran terbaru yang akan dipraktikan semasa proses pembelajaran,
maklumat terkini dalam bidang penyelidikan dan lain-lain lagi.

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini digunapakai oleh Pensyarah,Penyelaras Program,Timbalan Dekan dan Dekan.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO. RUJUKAN
NAMA DOKUMEN Bilik Pengarah Jabatan -Tiada-

Prosedur Menghadiri Kerja Luar Sumber Manusia

4. DEFINISI Laporan yang perlu dibuat oleh kakitangan akademik
Laporan menghadiri selepas menghadiri seminar, kursus, bengkel dan
kerja luar pembentangan kertas kerja

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR

Tindakan Tanggungjawab

1. Dekan, Timbalan Dekan, Penyelaras Program, Pensyarah Kakitangan
mendapat jemputan menghadiri seminar, bengkel, kursus akademik terlibat
atau pembentangan kertas kerja.

2. Dekan, Timbalan Dekan, Penyelaras Program, Pensyarah Kakitangan
menghadiri seminar, bengkel, kursus atau pembentangan akademik terlibat
kertas kerja.

3. Dekan, Timbalan Dekan, Penyelaras Program, Pensyarah Kakitangan
menyediakan laporan menghadiri seminar, bengkel, akademik terlibat
kursus atau pembentangan kertas kerja.

4. Pengesahan menghadiri kerja luar adalah seperti berikut Kakitangan

• Bagi kakitangan Akademik yang menghadiri akademik terlibat

seminar, kursus atau pembentangan kertas kerja,

pengesahan perlu dibuat oleh pengelola seminar,

kursus atau pembentangan kertas kerja.

• Bagi kakitangan akademik yang menghadiri

bengkel pengajaran dan pembelajaran atau

bengkel peperiksaan, pengesahan perlu dibuat

oleh penyelaras program IPTA masing-masing.

255

5. Setelah selesai membuat laporan, kakitangan akademik -Kakitangan
perlu menghantar laporan tersebut kepada Dekan Fakulti. akademik terlibat
Kakitangan akademik juga perlu membuat satu salinan
untuk simpanan fail subjek atau fail program. -Dekan Fakulti

6. LAMPIRAN

BIL PERKARA LAMPIRAN NO RUJUKAN

1. Carta Alir Prosedur Penyediaan Lampiran 1

Laporan Menghadiri Kerja Luar

2. Borang Laporan Menghadiri Lampiran 2

Kerja Luar

256

SECTION 09 (XXI): ANNUAL WORK PLAN PROCEDURE - SOP

Annual Work Plan

JABATAN PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
AKADEMIK KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

SASARAN KERJA NO. PINDAAN : 00
TAHUNAN TARIKH KUATKUASA : 9 JULAI 2012
MUKASURAT :1

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan
oleh
Tandatangan MUSLINA BT HJ. MD
MUIS PN. SITI MASRINA
Nama SUHANA BT BTSULONG
Jawatan BAHARUDIN KETUA AUDIT
Tarikh SETIAUSAHA AUDIT DALAMAN AKADEMIK PENOLONG NAIB
DALAMANAKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
22 JUN 2012
5 MEI 2012 27 JUN 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan dokumen
inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

HALAMAN DIPINDA

Tarikh No. No. Muka Ringkasan Pindaan Tarikh
Pindaan Diluluskan
Para surat

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

257

1. OBJEKTIF
Sasaran Kerja Tahunan (SKT) adalah elemen penting dalam Sistem Penilaian Prestasi Staf
Akademik. Aktiviti penting proses penyediaan SKT adalah seperti berikut: -
(i) Perancangan Tahunan Universiti;
(ii) Penetapan Rancangan Kerja Fakulti
(iii) Penetapan SKT dan Petunjuk Prestasi;
(iv) Pelaksanaan Kerja dan Pengesanan;
(v) Kajian Semula Pertengahan Tahun; dan
(vi) Penilaian Pencapaian Kerja Sebenar
Semua aktiviti penting tersebut perlu dilaksanakan dengan teliti dan teratur. Ini membolehkan
penilaian prestasi kakitangan akademik dapat dilaksanakan dengan objektif, adil dan telus.

2 SKOP
Penyediaan SKT ini perlu dilaksanakan mengikut panduan yang disediakan serta membuat
pemantauan supaya ianya selaras dengan Perancangan Tahunan Universiti dan Rancangan
Kerja Fakulti berkenaan. Dekan Fakulti, Pegawai Yang Dinilai (PYD) dan Pegawai Penilai (PP)
hendaklah memberi perhatian kepada semua peringkat penyediaan dan pelaksanaan SKT ini.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO RUJUKAN
NAMA DOKUMEN

1. Prosedur Penilaian Prestasi Staf BILIK LOKASI PENOLONG
Akademik NAIB CANSELOR
(AKADEMIK)

4. DEFINISI

Pegawai Penilai (PP) bermaksud Pegawai Penilai Pertama (PPP) dan Pegawai Penilai Kedua

(PPK);

Pegawai Penilai pegawai atasan atau penyelia yang terdekat kepada Pegawai yang

Pertama (PPP) dinilai (PYD) dan mempunyai hubungan kerja secara langsung atau

yang mengawasi kerjanya.

Pegawai Penilai pegawai atasan yang terdekat kepada PPP dan mempunyai hubungan

Kedua (PPK) kerja dengan PYD. Jika hanya terdapat satu peringkat penyeliaan,

maka penilaian bolehlah dibuat oleh PPP sahaja.

Pegawai yang dinilai Semua staf akademik yang dinilai .

(PYD)

Perancangan Perancangan tahunan di peringkat Fakulti. Sekiranya sesebuah jabatan

Tahunan itu tidak dikawalselia oleh mana-mana organisasi maka Fakulti

berkenaan perlu mempunyai Perancangan Tahunannya sendiri

Perancangan Kerja Rancangan tindakan kerja tahunan yang perlu dilaksanakan di

Tahunan peringkat Fakulti selaras dengan Perancangan Kerja Tahunan

Universiti yang telah ditetapkan;

Aktiviti/Projek Aktiviti/projek utama yang hendak dilaksanakan oleh kakitangan bagi

tahun yang dinilai selaras dengan Perancangan Tahunan dan

Perancangan Kerja Tahunan;

Pertunjuk Prestasi 258

kuantiti, kualiti, masa dan kos atau kombinasinya bagi setiap satu
aktiviti/projek;

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR Tanggungjawab Jangkamasa
Tindakan
Naib Canselor Disember/Januari
1. Perancangan Tahunan Universiti Senat

Menentukan strategi dan jenis
program, projek dan aktiviti tahunan
Universiti berasaskan dasar serta
sumber kewangan, keanggotaan,
maklumat dan peralatan yang
diperuntukkan.

2. Penetapan Rancangan Kerja Fakulti

Mengagihkan tugas dan tanggungjawab Disember/Januari
pelaksanaan program, projek dan
aktiviti serta menentukan rancangan Dekan Fakulti
kerja Fakulti berasaskan sumber yang
diperuntukkan.

3. Penetapan Sasaran Kerja dan Petunjuk Januari
Prestasi PYD Januari- Jun
Pegawai Penilai
Menetapkan SKT termasuk jenis projek, Pertama (PPP)
aktiviti dan jangkamasa siap serta
petunjuk prestasi mengikut jenis kerja Pegawai Penilai
berasaskan kuantiti, kualiti, kos dan Kedua (PPK)
masa

4. Pelaksanaan Kerja dan Pengesanan

Merealisasikan program, projek dan Pegawai Yang
aktiviti berdasarkan sasaran kerja yang Dinilai (PYD)
ditetapkan dengan menggunakan
sumber yang ada.

5. Kajian Semula Pertengahan Tahun Pegawai Yang

Dinilai (PYD)

Mengkaji pencapaian kerja sebenar Jun-Julai

berbanding dengan sasaran kerja yang Pegawai Penilai

ditetapkan pada awal tahun. Pertama (PPP)

Mencatitkan aktiviti/projek yang

ditambah atau digugurkan.

259

6. Pelaksanaan Kerja dan Pengesanan Pegawai Yang

Dinilai (PYD) Julai- Disember

Merealisasikan program, projek dan

aktiviti berdasarkan sasaran yang

ditetapkan dengan menggunakan

sumber yang ada

7. Penilaian Pencapaian Kerja Pegawai Yang

Dinilai (PYD) Disember

PYD dan PPP membuat ulasan (Minggu ke – 2)

keseluruhan pencapaian kerja Pegawai Penilai

Pertama (PPP)

6. LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN NO RUJUKAN
BIL PERKARA Lampiran 1
1. Aliran Pusingan Penyediaan Sasaran Kerja
Lampiran 2
Tahunan Lampiran 3
2. Panduan Penyediaan Sasaran Kerja Tahunan Lampiran 4
3. Borang Sasaran Kerja Tahunan
4. Contoh Sasaran Kerja Tahunan

260

SECTION 09 (XXII): ACADEMIC STAFF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT -
SOP

Academic Staff Performance Assessment

JABATAN PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
AKADEMIK KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

PENILAIAN PRESTASI NO. PINDAAN : 00
STAFF AKADEMIK TARIKH KUATKUASA : 9 JULAI
2012
MUKASURAT :1

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan oleh

Tandatangan MUSLINA BT HJ. MD PN. SITI MASRINA
MUIS BTSULONG
Nama SUHANA BT
Jawatan BAHARUDIN KETUA AUDIT PENOLONG NAIB
Tarikh SETIAUSAHA AUDIT DALAMAN AKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
DALAMANAKADEMIK
22 JUN 2012 27 JUN 2012
5 MEI 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan dokumen
inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

Tarikh No. HALAMAN DIPINDA Tarikh
Pindaan No. Muka surat Ringkasan Pindaan Diluluskan
Para

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

261

1. OBJEKTIF
Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik adalah untuk mengukur prestasi dan mengekalkan serta
mempertingkatkan keupayaan dan produktiviti staf akademik serta memberikan
pencapaian organisasi keseluruhannya. Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik adalah digunakan
sebagai asas di dalam pelaksanaan beberapa aspek pengurusan kakitangan akademik
seperti berikut: -
a) mengenalpasti staf akademik yang mencapai markah di bawah 60% serta
membuat tindakan susulan.

b) menentukan penempatan dan bidang kerjaya yang sesuai dengan potensi,
kebolehan, keistimewaan serta kemajuan kakitangan akademik khususnya;

c) menentukan kelayakan dan kesesuaian untuk pergerakan dan anjakan gaji;

d) menentukan penganugerahan khidmat akademik cemerlang serta pemberian
surat penghargaan;

e) mengenalpasti dan merancang keperluan latihan; dan

f) memberi kaunseling dengan tujuan memperbaiki dan mempertingkat prestasi serta
motivasi pegawai.

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini perlu diikuti dengan sepenuhnya oleh Pegawai Yang Dinilai (PYD), Pegawai
Penilai Pertama (PPP), Pegawai Penilai Kedua (PPK), dan Urusetianya supaya dapat
menghasilkan penilaian yang objektif, adil dan telus. Hasil penilaian ini membolehkan
pihak-pihak berkenaan mengambil tindakan, pertimbangan dan keputusan yang tepat
berkaitan dengan pengurusan dan kemajuan kerjaya staf akademik WUC.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN

NAMA DOKUMEN LOKASI NO

RUJUKAN

1.Prosedur Sasaran Kerja Tahunan (SKT)

2.Prosedur Penilaian Prestasi Pembelajaran dan BILIK PENOLONG

Pengajaran NAIB CANSELOR

3.Prosedur Penilaian Penasihat Akademik (AKADEMIK)

4. Prosedur Latihan Praktikal dan Klinikal

5. Borang Semakan Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik

4. DEFINISI

Pegawai Penilai (PP) bermaksud Pegawai Penilai Pertama (PPP) dan Pegawai Penilai

Kedua (PPK);

Pegawai Penilai pegawai atasan atau penyelia yang terdekat kepada Pegawai

Pertama (PPP) yang dinilai (PYD) dan mempunyai hubungan kerja secara

langsung atau yang mengawasi kerjanya.

262

Pegawai Penilai pegawai atasan yang terdekat kepada PPP dan mempunyai
Kedua (PPK) hubungan kerja dengan PYD. Jika hanya terdapat satu peringkat
penyeliaan, maka penilaian bolehlah dibuat oleh PPP sahaja.
Pegawai yang dinilai Semua staf akademik yang dinilai .
(PYD)
Urusetia Penilaian Urusetia yang dilantik oleh Senat WUC
Prestasi Staf
Akademik

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR Tanggungjawab Jangkamasa
Tindakan Urusetia
November
1.Penyediaan dan Pengedaran borang: (minggu-1)
Menyediakan dan Mengedarkan borang –borang
penilaian prestasi staf akademik dan Sasaran Kerja
Tahunan (SKT) kepada semua staf akademik.
(Pegawai Yang Dinilai-PYD)

2. Pengisian borang: Pegawai Yang Januari-
*Pengisian Bahagian I dan II di dalam borang SKT Dinilai (PYD) Disember
dan;
Pengisian Bahagian I dan II di dalam borang November
penilaian prestasi staf akademik. (Minggu-2)
*Rujuk prosedur sasaran kerja tahunan

3. Pengumpulan borang: Urusetia November
Mengumpul semua borang penilaian prestasi dan (Minggu-3)
SKT tahun penilaian yang telah diisi oleh PYD
dan;
Borang Semakan Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik.
(Borang ini perlu diedarkan pada awal tahun dan
PYD perlu melengkapkannya sepanjang tahun
yang dini

263

4. Penilaian setiap borang oleh PPP: Pegawai Penilai November
4.1 Membuat penilaian di Bahagian III Pertama (PPP) (Minggu-4)

hingga IX di dalam borang prestasi Dan
serta; merujuk pada Borang
Semakan Penilaian Prestasi Staf Disember
Akademik. (Minggu-1)
4.2 Meneliti, mengesahkan dan menilai butir-
butir yang diisi oleh PYD serta Disember
berbincang dengannya sebelum (Minggu-2)
menandatangani di ruangan Bahagian X,
Bahagian XI dan Bahagian XII. Urusetia
4.3 Jika perbincangan tersebut ada
bangkangan daripada PYD maka ulang ke Pegawai Disember
proses 4.2. Jika tiada bangkangan terus ke Penilai (Minggu-3)
4.4 Kedua
4.4 Menyerahkan borang yang lengkap diisi Dan
kepada Urusetia (PPK)
Disember
5. Pengumpulan borang daripada PPP: (Minggu-4)
5.1Mengumpul semua borang penilaian
Urusetia Januari
prestasi yang telah diisi oleh Pegawai (Minggu-1dan
Penilai Pertama (PPP) 2
5.2Menyerahkan borang-borang
penilaian prestasi kepada Pegawai
Penilai Kedua (PPK)

6. Penilaian setiap borang oleh PPK:
6.1 Membuat penilaian di Bahagian III

hingga IX di dalam borang prestasi
serta; boleh merujuk pada Borang
Semakan Penilaian Prestasi Staf
Akademik.
6.2 Meneliti, mengesahkan dan menilai butir-
butir yang diisi oleh PYD serta berbincang
dengannya sebelum menandatangani di
ruangan Bahagian X, Bahagian XI dan
Bahagian XII.
6.3 Jika perbincangan tersebut ada
bangkangan daripada PYD maka ulang ke
proses 6.1. Jika tiada bangkangan terus ke
6.4.
6.4 Menyerahkan borang yang lengkap diisi
kepada Urusetia

7. Pengumpulan , semakan dan
memasukkan markah semua borang:
7.1 Mengumpul semula semua borang

penilaian prestasi dari PPK Senat 264
Urusetia
7.2 Menyemak dan memastikan semua Januari
borang penilaian prestasi staf telah (Minggu- 3)
lengkap diisi oleh PYD, PPP dan PPK.
Januari
7.3 Memasukan markah penilaian prestasi (Minggu-4)
setiap staf ke dalam “excel” serta
mengeluarkan Laporan Pemarkahan
Penilaian Prestasi yang telah disahkan
oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor
(Akademik) / Dekan Fakulti untuk
keperluan Mesyuarat Senat.

8. Mesyuarat Senat:
Menyelaras penilaian prestasi staf akademik.
Penyelarasan ini termasuklah:

a) bertanggungjawab dalam urusan penilaian prestasi
staf dan mengesahkan markah penilaian prestasi.
b)bertanggungjawab mengenalpasti keperluam latihan
staf.
c) mengesyorkan bimbingan dan kaunseling dengan
tujuan memperbaiki dan mempertingkatkan prestasi
serta motivasi.
d)mengesyorkan penempatan dan pembangunan
kerjaya staf.

9. Penyimpanan Maklumat Prestasi:
Penghantaran dan penyimpanan borang Laporan
Penilaian Prestasi tahun penilaian ke setiap fakulti
masing-masing.
(Catatan: Sila isikan nombor fail peribadi staf di muka
depan setiap borang penilaian prestasi untuk
memudahkan penyimpanan di fail peribadi)

6. LAMPIRAN

BIL PERKARA LAMPIRA NO RUJUKAN

N

1. Carta Alir Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik 1

2. Borang Semakan Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik 2

3. Borang Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik 3

4. Laporan Pemarkahan Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik 4

5. Contoh Data Pemarkahan Penilaian Prestasi Staf 5

Akademik

6. Panduan Penyediaan Penilaian Prestasi Staf Akademik 6

265

SECTION 09 (XXIII): LECTURER PERFORMANCE IPROVEMENT- SOP

Lecturer Performance Improvement

PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

JABATAN PENINGKATAN NO. PINDAAN : 00
AKADEMIK PRESTASI PENSYARAH TARIKH KUATKUASA : 9 JULAI 2012
:1
MUKASURAT

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan oleh

Tandatangan SUHANA BT MUSLINA BT HJ. MD PN. SITI MASRINA
Nama BAHARUDIN MUIS BTSULONG
Jawatan SETIAUSAHA AUDIT
Tarikh DALAMANAKADEMIK KETUA AUDIT PENOLONG NAIB
DALAMAN AKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
5 MEI 2012
22 JUN 2012 27 JUN 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan
dokumen inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

Tarikh No. HALAMAN DIPINDA
Pindaan No. Muka surat Ringkasan Pindaan Tarikh
Para Diluluskan

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

266

1. OBJEKTIF
Prosedur ini disediakan bertujuan untuk membantu pensyarah meningkatkan prestasi
terutamanya bagi mereka yang memperolehi skor kurang daripada 60% dalam penilaian
prestasi pensyarah atau ‘Key Performance Index’ (KPI) dan juga skor kurang dari 60% bagi
penilaian pensyarah dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PNP)

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini digunapakai oleh Pengurusan Akademik untuk memastikan peningkatan
prestasi pensyarah dapat dijalankan dengan baik.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO RUJUKAN
BILIK PENOLONG NAIB -TIADA-
NAMA DOKUMEN CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
1. Buku Peraturan Akademik BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
WUC CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
2. Prosedur Penilaian Prestasi
Staf Akademik BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
3. Prosedur Penilaian
Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran

4. DEFINISI Ketua fakulti yang dilantik oleh Naib Cancelor WUC
Dekan Fakulti
Jawatankuasa Penilai • Mereka yang bertanggungjawab menilai prestasi pensyarah
• Pensyarah berpengalaman yang dilantik oleh Dekan
Penyelaras Program Staf Akademik yang telah dilantik oleh Dekan untuk menyelia
tadbir program yang dikendalikan.
Pensyarah Mereka yang mengendalikan kuliah bagi kursus yang ditetapkan
termasuk yang bertaraf tetap, kontrak atau sambilan.

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR

Tindakan Tanggungjawab

1. Penilaian prestasi staf akademik tahunan (Penilaian tahunan

pensyarah) Jawatankuasa

• Merekod dan mengenalpasti pensyarah yang Penilai

memperolehi skor di bawah 60%

2. Penilaian pengajaran dan pembelajaran (Penilaian pensyarah

bagi setiap semester)

• Merekod dan mengenalpasti pensyarah yang

memperolehi skor di bawah 60%

3. Dekan fakulti mengenalpasti pensyarah yang perlu menjalani Dekan Fakulti
kursus dan latihan intensif berdasarkan keputusan penilaian
prestasi pensyarah (KPI) dan penilaian pengajaran dan
pembelajaran (PNP) oleh jawatankuasa penilai.

4. Dekan mengenalpasti bahagian yang perlu ditingkatkan
berdasarkan markah penilaian prestasi pensyarah (KPI) dan

267

penilaian pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PNP) serta melalui
perbincangan dan temubual bersama penyelaras program.

5. Penyelaras program berbincang bersama pensyarah dan

seterusnya mencadangkan latihan serta kursus intensif yang Dekan Fakulti/

perlu dihadiri oleh kumpulan pensyarah berkenaan Ketua Program

6. Pensyarah menjalani latihan dan kursus intensif pada masa Pensyarah
yang ditetapkan

7. Pemantauan prestasi dari semasa ke semasa Penyelaras Program

8. Tindakan susulan: Dekan Fakulti
Menganjurkan aktiviti berbentuk seminar, bengkel atau kursus
pengajaran bagi meningkatkan prestasi pensyarah yang
terlibat.

9. Menghadiri aktiviti yang dianjurkan oleh pihak pengurusan Pensyarah
mengikut ketetapan yang telah diberikan.

10. Maklumbalas dari pensyarah mengenai aktiviti yang dihadiri. Pensyarah

6. LAMPIRAN

BIL PERKARA LAMPIRAN NO RUJUKAN

1. Carta Alir Prosedur Peningkatan Prestasi Pensyarah Lampiran 1

268

SECTION 09 (XXIV): LECTURER WORKLOAD - SOP

23. DETERMINING LECTURER WORKLOAB

PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

TENTU BEBAN KERJA NO. PINDAAN : 00
: 9 JULAI 2012
JABATAN PENSYARAH TARIKH KUATKUASA :1
AKADEMIK

MUKASURAT

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan oleh

Tandatangan SUHANA BT MUSLINA BT HJ. MD PN. SITI MASRINA
Nama BAHARUDIN MUIS BTSULONG
Jawatan SETIAUSAHA AUDIT
Tarikh DALAMANAKADEMIK KETUA AUDIT PENOLONG NAIB
DALAMAN AKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
5 MEI 2012
22 JUN 2012 27 JUN 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan dokumen
inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

Tarikh No. HALAMAN DIPINDA Tarikh
Pindaan No. Muka surat Ringkasan Pindaan Diluluskan
Para

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

269

1. OBJEKTIF
Prosedur ini disediakan bertujuan untuk:
• menentukan beban kerja pensyarah
• pengagihan beban kerja yang adil di antara pensyarah

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini digunapakai oleh semua program untuk memastikan beban kerja dapat di
agihkan kepada semua pensyarah.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN

DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO.RUJUKAN
-TIADA-
1. Buku Peraturan Akademik BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
WUC/ACAD/KPP02
WUC CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)

2. Prosedur Penyediaan BILIK PENOLONG NAIB

Jadual Waktu Pengajaran CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)

4. DEFINISI • Staf Akademik yang dilantik oleh Dekan bagi setiap
Ketua Progra fakulti untuk mengetuai penyelaras program dalam
(KP) menyelia tadbir sesebuah program pengajian.

Penyelaras Program • Staf Akademik yang telah dilantik oleh Dekan untuk
(PP) menyelia tadbir program yang dikendalikan.

Pensyarah • Mereka yang mengendalikan kuliah bagi kursus yang
(P) ditetapkan termasuk yang bertaraf tetap, kontrak atau
sambilan.
Unit Penjadualan
(UP) • Individu yang dilantik untuk menyediakan jadual waktu
pengajaran.

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR

TINDAKAN TANGGUNGJAWAB

1. Kenalpasti kursus yang akan ditawarkan pada semester

berkenaan dan bilangan pelajar terlibat. Penyelaras Program

2. Kenalpasti bilangan pensyarah bagi setiap kursus dan
bilangan kumpulan bagi kursus tersebut serta melengkap
borang WUC/ACAD/KPP01/B01.

270

3. Menyusun semula beban kerja bagi setiap pensyarah Timbalan Dekan /
mengikut keperluan. Ketua Program

4. Serah senarai beban tugas untuk semua pensyarah bagi Penyelaras Program /

setiap kumpulan pelajar kepada unit penjadualan. Unit Penjadualan

5. Penyediaan jadual kelas Unit Penjadualan

6. LAMPIRAN

271

SECTION 10: POLICY & PROCEDURE – CURRICULUM REVIEW AND
DEVELOPMENT

SECTION 10 (I): NEW PROGRMME AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

NEW PROGRAMME AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

ACADEMIC POLICY – NEW PROGRAMME AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

Introduction

In WUC expansion policy, new programmes will need to be developed. This development of new
programmes will be based on certain purposes such as demands, new development in studies, new relevant
industrial programmes, programmes to support existing programmes or spin off from existing programme
with new technologies or subjects. The instruction or proposal to develop a new programme may come
from faculty members, Dean or from top-down instructions at the level of University Academic Board,
Senate or WESB top management. Any proposal will need to undergoes deliberation and agreed upon by
the University Academic Board before being presented to the University Academic Management
Committee (AMCOM) for initial approval to proceed with the development of the programme.

When presenting to AMCOM, as AMCON consist of members of the WESB managers, consideration for
approval to start development of curriculum must include looking into feasibility of programme such as
demand, potential student enrolment numbers, target group, facilities support, industry relevant, career
pathways, fee structure, financial implications and so on.

When initial approval is obtained from AMCOM, University Academic Board will identify the person and
faculty in charge of developing the programme. Once identified, the faculty will set up a special Board of
Studies relevant to the programme to be developed. This board of studies shall include important
stakeholders that include, content expert of programme, industrial related person as advisor, a programme
manager for the programme and a secretary.

In developing the curriculum for the programme, WUC will follow the guidelines provided by MQA. This
guideline is available in MQA, Programme Standards for Education, 2016. Programme Standards are
developed to provide specific guidelines to providers such as WUC in a particular field or course of study so
as to fulfil the MQF requirements. These standards, if followed closely and wisely, enable the development
and sustenance of quality programmes in WUC and in Malaysia generally, consequently improving the
quality of graduates and their employability and mobility

In the development of a new programme the programme developer must include
• programme aims and objectives,
• programme learning outcomes,
• programme designs (including a proposed programme structure),
• admission criteria (minimum entry qualification)
• assessment of student learning (examination strategy)
• academic staff,
• educational resources and
• continual quality improvement.

272

Establishing a new academic programme takes time, commitment, teamwork and understanding of
academic and educational principles. The MQA standards bust be followed to ensure the new programme
will be accredited by this regulatory body.

This policy and procedure will assist any new programme developers through the development and
approval process of WUC.

The initial process for approval on proposal for new curriculum development shall follow the process chart
as below;

New Programme Proposal
As Concept Paper

Proposed at Faculty Level Proposed by Top Management
Proposal presented to AMCOM
Reviewed and approve by Dean
For submission of Concept Paper to

AMCOM

AMCOM approve for Feasibility
Studies

Programme Feasible Programme Not-
to Develop Feasible to
Develop
AMCOM Approve for Curriculum
Development AMCOM Curriculum
Development
UAB identify Board of Studies to
Overlook Programme and
Curriculum Development

Faculty Develops Curriculum

Approve Completed Curriculum Presented to Curriculum Needs
Curriculum UAB for Verification & Approval. Improvement

Curriculum for Senate Endorsement To return back to
Submit to KPT/MQA for Approval Faculty for
Improvement

273

SECTION 10 (II): PROGRAMME & CURRICULUM REVIEW

PROGRAMME AND CURRICULUM REVIEW

Introduction

WUC is an education industry. Programmes are products akin to business offers. For the
programmes to sustain validity and relevancy, it must undergo constant improvement so as to give
confidence to the public and stakeholders in engaging WUC as an excellent and trusted education
provider. It also ensures that the programme content is current and not outdated. Its product
remains relevant to the need of current industries. University programmes exist and rely on its
curriculum development. Hence, to ensure programme validity, currency, up to date and relevant
to current industry Programme and Curriculum review is an essential practice for university like
WUC.

Programme and Curriculum Review is a critical examination of academic programs for the purpose
of optimizing student learning experiences led collaboratively by academic staff who teach within
the program. Hence to ensure this continuous quality improvement is taken care of, WUC develops
policy and procedure for its programme curriculum review. This shall be conducted periodically,
systematically and when the need arises.

Programme and Curriculum review is conducted at the faculty level where the programmes are
run. The Dean is responsible in ensuring curriculum review are periodically conducted through the
Faculty Curriculum Review and Development Committee. Officially Programme and Curriculum
Review should be conducted once in three (3) years. However, at every end of an academic
calendar of programme running an interim report is obtain on any new development or changes
required pertaining to curriculum content or delivery or new recommendations by MQA or KPT.
This interim review activities identify issues or improvement that need to be address on a yearly
basis or immediately. These required changes shall exist as an interim report to be documented
and added to the full Programme and Curriculum review report.

Programme and Curriculum review is not just review in content of curriculum as visualised in a
document form, it incorporates External Examiners’ reports, student feedback, enrolments,
progression and completion, assessment results, student performance, student classroom
evaluation, mentoring feedback, lecturer-reflection, degree outcomes and employability. This
means areas of evaluation includes, are involving curriculum and delivery, staffing, assessments
strategy and quality, resources supporting curriculum delivery and many others. Hence curriculum
review has its complexity.

To systematically develop Curriculum Review in WUC, the procedure is divided into four main
sections:

274

1. Programme/Course Co-ordinator report
Programme Manager/ Course Coordinators make a general statement about what has gone well
on the course, what could be improved and what changes are planned for the future.

2. Assessment & Feedback
Description of formative and summative assessment for course or programme. Outlining whether
feedback has been provided to students within published deadlines.

3. Course Performance analysis.
Note the trends on how students are performing on the module. Context for the observed
trends, what they indicate, or what they might mean. The changes in planning to make, if any, as
a result of these analysis.

Report on Course Evaluation for the semester, must include:
• Areas of good practice.
• Areas for development.
• Actions that will be taken.
• How have you communicated with and engaged students?

4. Programme or Course development;
Report and record of any changes made to programme and course. Specifically, its learning
outcomes, key skills, references, teaching and learning methods and delivery, and employability
report. If there are changes made to the programme/course in the previous year, what impact did
these changes have? Please comment on any issues raised by the internal moderator and/or
external examiner.

Curriculum review is very much a self-auditing process. To accomplish this in already establish
programme and curriculum already undergone scrutiny and passed by MQA may be a difficult task.
To achieve satisfactory self-auditing, we will have to ask questions very much like establishing
research. There are questions relevant to what we need to know about our curriculum or
programme. The list of questions below perhaps can assist us when conducting a curriculum review
and provide us guidance on the required report.

Start Points for Drafting Guiding Questions
This list can provide a starting point of questions to guide a curriculum review process:

General questions:
• What are the strengths of the program?
• How are program-level learning outcomes (PLOs) addressed in specific courses of the
program?
• Are there any program-level learning outcomes that are not adequately addressed?
• Looking at the scope and sequence of the courses within the program, are there any gaps
• and/or overlaps in learning outcomes? If so, where?

Accreditation:
• If your program has an external accrediting body, you might add guiding questions to fulfil
their requirements to allow you to complete both accreditation and curriculum review
process simultaneously.

275

Purpose of the program:
• How current is the program? What is being emphasized? Are we preparing graduates for
traditional and/or emerging roles?
• What careers do graduates of the program go on to have?
• How can we make the program more innovative?
• What is the right balance of discipline-specific courses and interdisciplinary courses to give?
• students a solid grounding in the discipline yet enhance their learning of broader
perspectives?
• What might a multidisciplinary approach look like?

Students:
• Who are our students?
• What do students want out of the program?
• What are their career goals?
• Why is there so much drop-off in registration after the introductory course? Why do students

decide not to continue in the discipline?
• What aspects of the program structure are problematic for students, and how might we

address them?
• Which of our courses are required by students in other faculties/ programs?
• To what extent are our courses meeting the needs of non-major students?
• What percentage of alumni go on to graduate studies at our institution?

Student learning experiences:
• To what extent do teaching and learning activities across the program scaffold student

learning, building it from an introductory level to more complex concepts?
• What teaching and learning activities are currently being used?
• Is there sufficient diversity?
• What high-impact educational practices do we have in our program, and where are they

located? Do we need to any or distribute them differently across the program?
• What aspects of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) do we excel at?
• What results are we dissatisfied with, and how might we address them?
• How might we plan experiential learning opportunities for students?
• What would that look like?
• How would it be scaffolded and assessed?
• How are we connecting theory to practice? What improvements should be made in this area?

Student assessment:
• To what extent do student assessment strategies across the program support and capture
• student learning?
• What student assessment strategies are used in the program, and do we need greater
diversity in these strategies?
• What are the DFW rates (grades of D or F, withdrawals) for the program?
• What is the rate to completion?
• If the statistics are not reasonable, what measures should we take to improve?
• How do we incorporate formative feedback across the program?
• Are our policies around (grading, deferrals, etc.) effective, or do we need to set/ examine
• specific policies?

276

Prerequisites:
• Do we have the right prerequisites for upper-level courses?
• Are more prerequisite courses needed for students to be successful in upper-level courses?
• Is a lack of prerequisite courses in certain upper-level courses problematic for students in terms

of their success in certain upper-level courses? Do they have the necessary understanding in
order to succeed in these courses?

Consistency across sections of a course:
• What approaches are different instructors taking in multiple sections of a course?
• How consistent are course outcomes, student learning experiences, and student assessments?
• Are there any issues, especially in courses that are prerequisites for other courses?
• How much flexibility should we give different instructors in multiple sections of a course to

bring their own expertise and research interests to the learning experience?

Content coverage:
• Are students getting opportunities to acquire foundational knowledge in the field?
• Is there an appropriate balance between foundational knowledge/ content and other

curricular concerns such as critical thinking and communication?
• To what extent does the program facilitate student learning of (writing skills, critical thinking,

professionalism, innovation, research skills or other initiative or strategy being targeted)?
• How can this learning be enhanced?

Core courses:
• Do we have the right core (required) courses in the program?
• How are the content and theories in core courses built upon in subsequent courses?
• How are we scaffolding student learning throughout the program?
• Is there adequate flexibility in the program to allow students to take courses of interest to

them, such as the embedded Sustainability or Mental Wellbeing and Resilience Certificate?

Program structure:
• Where are the bottlenecks in the program and how do we resolve them?
• What courses have high percentages of failure rates and/or withdrawal?
• What courses are out of sequence or offered in the wrong term?
• Who is graduating from our program, and who isn’t?
• Why do students transfer out of the program?

Intended and Perceived Curriculum:
• How effective are instructors at conveying course expectations to students?
• What is the difference between the intended curriculum and what students actually learn (the

perceived curriculum)?

Academic integrity:
• How do students learn about academic integrity?
• Are we doing enough and the right things in this area?
• How do we help students who are struggling?

277

Areas of Emphasis:
• Do we concentrate on the learning experience in service courses that have students from all

faculties (for example, first-year tutorials) or dedicate more resources to advanced courses
that have more of our majors?
• Should writing-intensive courses throughout the program?

Faculty/ department and institutional priorities:
• How does our program align with graduate attributes, at the faculty and/or institutional
level?
• Does our program align with strategic priorities?
• How are Indigenous perspectives being incorporated into the program in terms of Indigenous
pedagogies and/or content?
• Are there any new or emerging priorities or initiatives that we should examine as part of our
review; for example:
o How do we enhance mental health and wellness in our students and staff?
o What are our priorities regarding technology integration into teaching and learning?
o What are our priorities regarding the internationalization strategy?
o How is experiential learning enacted in the program and what opportunities exist
to further incorporate it?

Procedures for Curriculum Review
1. Planning for Curriculum review
2. Faculty meeting endorsement
3. Curriculum Review and Development Committee
4. Design Format for Report
5. Collection of Data
6. Summarizing and recommendation report
7. Propose Action Plans
8. Submission to UAB

REPORTING
Overview of Report Structure
Reporting of Curriculum shall be in the following format to include;

Program Name
Faculty:
Date of Report:
Person Reporting Name:
Date reviewed by UAB:

SECTION CONTENT

Executive summary
an overview of the report including the focus of the review, data collected, findings, and major
recommendations. Context a brief description of the program’s history, relation to field of study,
particular strengths, accreditation requirements, etc.

278

Overview
description of both the program and the CR process (including the program-level learning
outcomes, program structure, etc.)

Guiding questions
the critical concerns that guided the CR process. At least one guiding question must address
institutional priority related to teaching and learning.
Guiding questions are critical questions or concerns that guide the curriculum review process. Similar to a
research study, a curriculum review uses guiding questions to focus inquiry on specific aspects of
curriculum. This helps to investigate every facet of a curriculum, so the guiding questions identify what you
most want to explore in the review; these could range from broad encompassing questions to specific
curricular concerns.

Data collection,
analysis and findings description of both the process and the findings from the data sources used
(curriculum mapping, and student feedback)

Consultation and engagement process
description of how academic staff, students and other groups were consulted and engaged
throughout the programme and curriculum review process

Action plan
a concise summary of how the program will address findings emerging from the CR process along
with strategies and metrics to monitor and evaluate the impact of these actions on student
learning and experience.

Communication plan
strategies that will be used to share findings and progress with students, faculty and staff

Appendices (optional)
data collection items, raw data, preliminary analysis, etc.

REPORTING FORMAT
The format for reporting is a guide, or framework, for your work in this arena. There may be
sections or specific questions that seem less relevant to your program or discipline. Alternatively,
there may be information you would like to provide that is not requested in the template. Please
tailor your responses to the questions in the way that makes the most sense
for your program and/or discipline, and add information as needed. It is perfectly acceptable to
link to other sources where you have documented your work; please in the template evidences so
that others can locate your documentation.

279

PROCEDURE AND PROCESS Faculty Dean Sets up Faculty
Curriculum Review &

Development Committee
(CRDC)

CRDC determines dates
expected for Curriculum Review

(CR) to take place based on
academic calendar

(End of semester/end year)

Course Coordinators compile
data for each course required for

CR Report

Course Coordinators present
report to CRDC

CRDC publish Report with
Recommendations and Action

plans to Dean

Dean present Report to
University Academic Board for
Further Actions in AMCOM if

any

NOTE:
• Timeline for Completion of Process for PCR for a programme – 1 Month
• Full process of PCR for a programme is conducted once in 3 years or once in five years
• Faculty with more than one programme is advice to split these individual programme PCR
accordingly so as not to cramp all in one year.

280

SECTION 10 (III): CURRICULUM CHANGE FORM

CURRICULUM CHANGE FORMS

Introduction

Changing the structure and content as awll delivery methods requires formal enry so as to capture
the process for change and documentation. This change shall be monitored and documents be
kept by the faculty curriculum development and review committee. By having this documentation
will help the programme manage or programme coordinator keep tract og changes and reson for
change that has occurred with the curriculum

Changes developed in curriculum forms part of a continuo’s quality improvement process. Chages
are made based on current need and relevancy of content or existance of new methods of delivery.

In this section, guideline is provided to ensure WUC curriculum in each course or programme is
done following WUC procedures.

Curriculum Change Forms

For curriculum change to take place, lecturer must familiarise themselves with these curriculum
change forms.

There are two types of curriculum change forms;

1. Minor Curriculum Change form (MiCC Form)

2. Major Curriculum Change Form (MjCC Form)

Instructions for Completing a Curriculum Change Form (MiCC & MjCC)

Please read the following information carefully. Correctly filling out the Curriculum Change Form
will facilitate the approval process. The Faculty Management Committee meets quaterly during
the academic year. The meeting dates, and deadlines for submitting your materials to the Dean’s
office, can be obtained from the office.

Type of Change:

• Be sure to check all categories that apply.
• Any proposal that changes more than 30% of a program/curriculum content must obtain

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia approvals as well as pre-approval from the Senate.
• A proposal for program revision will also requires an approval from the Curriculum Review

& Development Committee.

281

• If the proposed course content is to replace an existing course, the Dean’s office will
automatically delete the course being replaced.

Course Information: All text boxes must be completed.

• If your new proposed change in the course requires a lab fee or others, in addition to
checking the box and listing the fee, please add a line to the description saying "Lab
fee/other required." Otherwise, the fee may not be charged for changes made or with new
equirement.

Overlap/Impact:

Any course content overlapping with or significantly impacting on the enrollments, offerings,
running of programs of other course/ or disciplines at the faculty are said to overlap and/or impact.
If such overlap/impact occurs, you must contact all chairs, managers, coordinators, etc. of those
programs for which this may be of concern and, before submission to any committee, try to arrive
at consensus concerning the appropriateness of the proposed action. Attach memos with
explanations/approvals. If there is any dissent and you sent the proposal forward, expect the
Senate and/or the relevant committees to either settle any questions or to return the proposal.

Justification for Change:

Justification for change should include all the reasons you feel this change should be made, e.g.,
streamlining the subject matter, providing appropriateness to the delivery of subject, placing
priorities in subject to be learned, more depth of study into an area, etc. Please be specific.

Course Description:

The form calls for a course description EXACTLY as it should appear in the curriculum. That means:
course code, course number, course title, number of credits / hours required (where appropriate),
course description, followed by course prerequisites, incurring fees or costs (if any). Do not omit
any of these please.

Contact person:

Name/phone/email of person to contact if questions arise about this request.

Approval Signatures:

Note that the completed Curricular Change Form, with all attachments, should be signed within
the faculty by the, the Coordinators, Programme Managers the appropriate Deputy Dean or Dean
(Faculty Curriculum Review and Development Committee Chair). Only then should these materials
be sent (hand delivered) to Faculty Management Committee for deliberation and subsequently to
UAB or Senate for endorsement when required.

Further Course Information: completion is required if “Type of Change” is asterisked (*).

282

Where Does the Course Fit into The Curriculum?

Briefly describe where and how this course fits in its specified curriculum/program

Course Objectives & Teaching Format:

A. List course objectives
B. List teaching modalities

Writing Requirements, Projects, Recitals, etc. Expected of Students:

List all expected student outcomes for this course if this related to student projects. Include a brief
description of the outcome expected.

One-page Syllabus/Outline of Course:

The maximum length of this document should be one page, i.e., a compact version of a standard
syllabus template. You may choose to decrease the type size to no smaller than 8 points. It would
be useful to bring copies of a complete syllabus to the meetings, in case members have more
detailed questions.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

A representative must attend the Faculty Management Committee Meeting should there be
questions from the Committee on this submission.

283

WIDAD University College
Curriculum Change Submission Form

MINOR CURRICULUM CHANGE (MiCC) FORM

Faculty: COURSE INFORMATION:
FACULTY OF MEDICINE
Course Coordinator:
Curriculum Change for: Current Credit Value:
Credit value after Change:
Course Code:

Course name:

Date of Submission Suggested Effective Date of Change:

Type of Minor Change 4. other______________________________
1. change to title of course
2. change to description of course Proposed Change
3. minor change to course content that is < 30% (Please indicate changes by underlining: course descriptions
must conform to curriculum style and are limited to 75 words.)
Current Curriculum Page Number _________

Existing Curriculum Entry (in full)

Rationale for the Proposed Change.

External Effects of the Proposed Change: Effect on program requirements; overlap with courses or programs in other
courses. EVIDENCE OF CONSULTATION IS REQUIRED FROM AFFECTED UNITS (attach one copy only).

Submitted by: Date:
Signature:

Curriculum Review & Development Committee Comments:

284

WIDAD University College
Curriculum Change Submission Form

MAJOR CURRICULUM CHANGE (MjCC) FORM

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MAJOR CURRICULUM CHANGES

ORIGINATING FACULTY: (Name)
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
FACULTY/DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL CONTACT:
(Local)

Please provide sufficient information to make the nature of the proposed change clear to all receiving parties. The whole
submission should be in Calendar order; pages of Major and Minor Changes should each be numbered in their own order,

independently. If a change will affect another academic unit, please indicate which unit(s) are affected.

Types of changes classified as Major
Changes

1. new course/program
2. change in aim of course
3. change in course unit value, division of year-

long
course, merging two semester courses
4. change in course number
5. change in contact hours
6. change of mutually-exclusive designation,
sequence
credit information, or cross-listing
information
7. change in grading
8. change in pre or co-requisite
9. change in program requirement
10.deletion of course (except under 5-year rule)
11.discontinuation of a program/degree

285

COURSE # TYPE OF CHANGE PAGE # IN EXTERNAL

(include titles of all new courses)

SUBMISSION EFFECT

(UNIT)

Summary of major changes i

286

REVIEW AND ABOLITION OF EXISTING ACADEMIC PROGRAMS

1. This policy applies to all proposals for the abolition of existing academic programs, whether
they originate as a result of periodic program review, in response to the identification of such
programs as "low productivity," or as part of an overall WESB restructuring OR WUC
restructuring.

2. In this policy for abolition or termination of a programme, only the Vice Chancellor can
propose abolition or termination of an existing programme to the University Board of
Governors.

3. The Vice Chancellor shall provide to the University Board of Governors with evidence that
the action is consistent with the adopted mission of WUC and can be implemented within the
existing program resources of WUC.

4. The University Board of Governors shall review each proposal for the abolition or termination
of an existing academic program and provide a report to the full Board of Governors.

5. The Vice Chancellor shall provide the University Board of Governors with information on
the following:

a. proposed date after which no new students will be admitted into the programme
b. accommodation of currently enrolled students in the realization of their degree

objectives;
c. treatment of all tenured and non-tenured faculty and other staff in the affected

program;
d. reallocation of funds from the budget of the affected program; and
e. existence at other state public institutions of programs to which to redirect students

who might have enrolled in the program proposed for abolition or termination.

287

SECTION 10 (IV): CURRICULUM REVIEW - SOP

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE – CURRICULUM REVIEW

PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

JABATAN PENLAIAN SEMIULA NO. PINDAAN : 00
AKADEMIK KURIKULUM TARIKH KUATKUASA : 9 JULAI 2012
:1
MUKASURAT

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan oleh

Tandatangan

Nama SUHANA BT MUSLINA BT HJ. MD PN. SITI MASRINA BT
Jawatan BAHARUDIN MUIS SULONG
Tarikh SETIAUSAHA AUDIT
DALAMANAKADEMIK KETUA AUDIT PENOLONG NAIB
DALAMAN AKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
5 MEI 2012
22 JUN 2012 27 JUN 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan
dokumen inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

Tarikh No. HALAMAN DIPINDA
Pindaan No. Muka surat Ringkasan Pindaan Tarikh
Para Diluluskan

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

288

1. OBJEKTIF
Prosedur ini disediakan untuk menjelaskan proses mengkaji dan menilai semula
kurikulum sedia ada di jabatan-jabatan akademik di Fakulti.

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini digunakan oleh semua Fakulti bagi mengkaji dan menilai semula kurikulum
sedia ada di jabatan-jabatan akademik.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO RUJUKAN
NAMA DOKUMEN -TIADA-

1. Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Tetap BILIK PENOLONG NAIB \
Senat/ Senat/ Jawatankuasa CANSELOR (AKADEMIK) -TIADA-
Pengurusan dan Lembaga
Pengarah Universiti.

2. Prosedur Pembangunan BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
Dokumen Kurikulum Baru CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)

3. Contoh kurikulum yang sedia BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
ada CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)

4. DEFINISI Mereka yang mengendalikan kuliah bagi kursus yang ditetapkan
Pensyarah termasuk yang bertaraf tetap, kontrak atau sambilan.

Jawatankuasa Jawatankuasa yang terdiri daripada beberapa orang pensyarah
Pembangunan yang bertanggungjawab untuk membangunkan kurikulum bagi
Kurikulum program masing-masing.
Jawatankuasa Akademik
Fakulti Jawatankuasa yang ditubuhkan fakulti yang bertanggungjawab
Unit Dokumentasi ke atas hal ehwal akademik pelajar.
Unit yang dilantik bagi menyimpan segala dokumen yang
Senat berkaitan dengan pembangunan dan pembaharuan kurikulum.

Keanggotaan SENAT WUC bertujuan menasihati Lembaga
Pengarah Universiti dalam segala hal akademik.

289

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR Tanggungjawab
Tindakan

1. Pemantauan berterusan keberkesanan kurikulum sedia ada Jawatankuasa
dengan mengumpul maklumat daripada beberapa sumber berikut: Pembangunan
Kurikulum
a. Penandaarasan
b. Keperluan pasaran Jawatankuasa
c. Laporan Pemeriksa Luar Pembangunan
d. Laporan Profesor Pelawat Kurikulum
e. Laporan Penasihat Fakulti
f. Badan-badan Profesional
g. Alumni

2. Menjalankan kajian secara terperinci mengenai kekuatan dan
kelemahan kurikulum sedia ada. Berdasarkan maklumat tersebut,
laporan penilaian semula kurikulum dihasilkan.

3. Laporan dibentangkan kepada Jawatankuasa Penasihat Fakulti Jawatankuasa

untuk dibuat keputusan sama ada pengubahsuaian kurikulum Pembangunan

diperlukan. Kurikulum

4. Menyedia dan membentangkan kertas kerja bagi mencadangkan Jawatankuasa
pengubalan/ kemaskini kurikulum sedia ada kepada Jawatankuasa Pembangunan
Akademik Fakulti sekiranya pengubahsuaian kursus berkenaan Kurikulum
diluluskan.

5. Menyediakan dan membentangkan kertas kerjadalam Senat untuk Jawatankuasa

penilaian dan kelulusan. Akademik Fakulti

6. Kurikulum yang telah dipinda kurang dari 30% dilaksanakan setelah Pensyarah
mendapat kelulusan Senat sekiranya tidak perlu mendapatkan
kelulusan MQA.

7. Kurikulum dipinda lebih 30% yang memerlukankelulusan Unit Dokumentasi
dihantar ke Unit Dokumentasi.

8. Menghantar dokumen yang lengkap ke MQA. Unit Dokumentasi

6. LAMPIRAN

BIL PERKARA LAMPIRAN NO RUJUKAN

1. Carta Alir Prosedur Penilaian Semula Kurikulum Lampiran 1

290

SECTION 10 (V): NEW CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT - SOP

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE – NEW CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

PROSEDUR NO RUJUKAN :
KUALITI OPERASI NO KELUARAN : 01

PENLAIAN SEMULA NO. PINDAAN : 00
: 9 JULAI 2012
JABATAN KURIKULUM TARIKH KUATKUASA :1
AKADEMIK

MUKASURAT

Disediakan oleh Disemak oleh Diluluskan oleh
Tandatangan

Nama SUHANA BT MUSLINA BT HJ. MD PN. SITI MASRINA BT
Jawatan BAHARUDIN MUIS SULONG
Tarikh SETIAUSAHA AUDIT
DALAMANAKADEMIK KETUA AUDIT PENOLONG NAIB
DALAMAN AKADEMIK CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
5 MEI 2012
22 JUN 2012 27 JUN 2012

REKOD PINDAAN DOKUMEN TERKAWAL
Adalah menjadi tanggungjawab Pemegang Dokumen untuk memastikan salinan
dokumen inisentiasa dikemaskini dengan memasukkan semua pindaan yang dinyatakan.

HALAMAN DIPINDA

Tarikh No. No. Muka Ringkasan Tarikh
Pindaan Diluluskan
Para surat Pindaan

BIL. ISI KANDUNGAN MUKASURAT

1. Objektif 4
2. Skop 4
3. Dokumen Rujukan 5
4. Definisi 5
5. Tanggungjawab dan Tindakan 6
6. Lampiran 7

291

1. OBJEKTIF
Prosedur ini disediakan bertujuan menerangkan proses pembangunan
dokumen kurikulum baru mengikut piawai yang ditetapkan oleh pihak
Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia (MQA).

2. SKOP
Prosedur ini digunapakai oleh Pengurusan Akademik untuk
membangunkan dokumen kurikulum baru mengikut proses yang betul
supaya ianya dapat dijalankan dengan baik.

3. DOKUMEN RUJUKAN LOKASI NO RUJUKAN
NAMA DOKUMEN

1. Standard Guideline dari BILIK PENOLONG NAIB -TIADA-
MQA dan mana-mana CANSELOR (AKADEMIK) -TIADA-
lembaga yang berkaitan
BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
2. Basic Guide to Writing Student CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
Learning OutcomeStatement
BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
3. Jadual Bloom Taxonomy CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)
BILIK PENOLONG NAIB
4. Contoh Pengiraan SLT CANSELOR (AKADEMIK)

4. DEFINISI Jawatankuasa yang terdiri daripada beberapa orang pensyarahyang
Jawatankuasa bertanggungjawab untuk membangunkan kurikulum bagi program
PembangunanKurikulum masing-masing

Jawatankuasa Akademik Jawatankuasa yang ditubuhkan fakulti yang bertanggungjawabke
Fakulti atas hal ehwal akademik pelajar.
Senat
Keanggotaan SENAT WUC bertujuan menasihati Lembaga Pengarah
Unit Dokumentasi Universiti dalam segala hal akademik

Unit yang dilantik bagi menyimpan segala dokumen yang
berkaitan dengan pembangunan dan pembaharuan kurikulum

5. KETERANGAN PROSEDUR Tanggungjawab

Tindakan Jawatankuasa
1. Mencadangkan dibangunkan. nama program yang hendak Akademik
Fakulti

292

2. Menjalankan kajian secara terperinci mengenai program yang dicadangkan Jawatankuasa
dari sumber-sumber berikut: Pembangu
nan
a. Keperluan pasaran Kurikulum
b. Laporan Pemeriksa Luar
c. Laporan Profesor Pelawat Jawatankuasa
d. Laporan Penasihat Fakulti Pembangunan
e. Badan-badan Profesional Kurikulum
f. Dasar-dasar Kerajaan

3. Rujuk Standard Guideline yang berkaitan dari MQA Board, dan sebagainya.

4. Membangunkan struktur program mengikut tahun pengajian. Antara Jawatankuasa
komponen yang perlu ada ialah : Pembangunan
Kurikulum
a. Kursus wajib MQA (9 jam kredit) iaitu Bahasa Kebangsaan A / Bahasa
Kebangsaan B, Pengajian Malaysia, Pengajian Islam / Pengajian Moral.

b. Kursus wajib Universiti (12 jam kredit) iaitu tiga kursus Bahasa Inggeris (2 jam
kredit setiap satu), satu kursus Keusahawanan (3 jam kredit) dan tiga kursus
ko-kurikulum (1 jam kredit setiap satu).

c. Kursus major dan kursus elektif mengikut standard program yang ditetapkan
olehpihak MQA.

5. Membangunkan Program Educational Objectives (PEO) dan Program Jawatankuasa

Outcome (PO). PO perlu dipadankan pada sekurang-kurangnya satu daripada Pembangunan

8 MQF yang ditetapkan oleh MQA. Kurikulum

7. Membangunkan silibus lengkap bagi setiap kursus mengikut format MQA. Jawatankuasa

Antara yang perlu diberi perhatian adalah: Pembangun

a. Kod Kursus: Rujuk kepada Panduan KodKursus anKurikulum

b. Pengiraan Jam Kredit: perlu dimasukkan sekali dengan Student Learning Time

(SLT) pelajar. Rujuk kepada dokumen Pengiraan SLT.

c. Learning Outcome: Rujuk kepada dokumen ‘Basic Guide to Writing Student

Learning Outcome Statement’.

d. Kaedah Penilaian: terdapat tiga komponen iaitu (Pilih mengikut kesesuaian

kursus)

i. Ujian 20%, Kerja Kursus 40%,Peperiksaan Akhir 40%

ii. Ujian 20%, Kerja Kursus 50%,Peperiksaan Akhir 30%

iii.Ujian 0%, Kerja Kursus 100%,Peperiksaan Akhir 0%

e. Pastikan ‘Mode of Delivery’ selari dengan SLT. Sekiranya dalam SLT tiada

peruntukan masa untuk tutorial, maka tiada ‘Tutorial’ dalam ‘Mode of

Delivery’.

f. Satu rujukan utama dan dua rujukan tambahan. Bagi rujukan tambahan,

tetapkan satu rujukan asas dan satu rujukanpengkayaan.

8. Padankan Course Outcome pada PEO dan PO.Sekiranya tiada yang dipadankan, Jawatankuasa

maka perlu dibuat semakan semula. Pembanguna

nKurikulum

293

9. COPPA MQA: Jawatankuasa Pembangunan Kurikulum dikehendaki Jawatankuasa

menjawab bagi Part C: Area1, 2 dan 3, sebahagian dari Area 4, 5, 6 dan 8. Rujuk Pembangunan

kepada lampiran dokumen MQA. Kurikulum

10. Menghantar semua dokumen ke Jawatankuasa Akademik Fakulti bagi Jawatankuasa
penilaian dan kelulusan. Jika memerlukan pengubahsuaian / pembetulan, Pembangunan
Jawatankuasa Pembangunan Kurikulum perlu mengubahkan kembali Kurikulum
dokumen mengikut keperluan.

11. Menyedia dan membentangkan kertas kerja dalamSenat untuk penilaian Jawatankuasa
dan kelulusan. Akademik Fakulti

12. Menghantar semua dokumen yang dibangunkan keUnit Dokumentasi untuk Unit Dokumentasi
digabungkan dengan dokumen lain dari MQA.

13. Menghantar dokumen yang lengkap ke MQA Unit Dokumentasi

6. LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN NO RUJUKAN

BIL PERKARA Lampiran 1

1. Carta Alir Prosedur Pembangunan Lampiran 2
DokumenKurikulum Baru Lampiran 3

2. Jadual Bloom Taxonomy

3. Contoh Pengiraan SLT

294

SECTION 11: POLICY & PROCEDURE – STUDENT ACADEMIC
REGULATIONS

SECTION 11 (A) : EXTENSION OF STUDIES

EXTENSION OF STUDIES

1. A student can apply to WUC for extension of studies after being certified sick by a
Medical Officer from a government or private hospital.

2. The semester that has been granted extension shall not be included in the total number
of semesters used for the duration of studies.

3. The maximum extension allowed for each application is TWO (2) following semesters.

4. The duration for extension granted to students will be counted as used semester of the
course.

5. The application for extending a semester must be made in writing by completing the
extension form attached with original supporting documents to the Faculty’s Dean at
least by the second week (2) of the semester for which extension is sought.

6. The application for extending a semester after the second week (2) can only be done
for health reasons and certified by a medical officer from a government or a private
hospital.

7. A student can also apply for extension for reasons other than health and such
application should be made before the last day of the final week of the nineth (9)
semester.

8. Extension will be included in the calculation of the number of used semester.

9. A student who has to extend his/her studies under the WUC Disciplinary Act, the
extension period will also be counted as a used semester.

295

SECTION 11(B): CHANGE OF COURSE FOR FULL-TIME STUDENTS

CHANGE OF COURSE FOR FULL-TIME STUDENTS

WUC shall consider a student’s application for a change of course of study in the faculty, or
between programmes with the following requirements:

I. a change can be made after following at least ONE (1) semester of studies.

II. the application for change must be made at least TWO (2) weeks before the
semester begins.

III. the student does not have a Fail (F) academic status.

IV. the maximum duration for the new course of study shall depend on the total
exempted credits approved by the faculty team.

V. for a change of programme in a similar diploma, student is given the following
options:

VI. the student’s original academic record can be used and student’s studies will be
considered as being continuous, or;

VII. the student’s original academic record will be closed, and a new record will be
created subject to matter 5 Part III.

A change of programme is allowed only once throughout the studies.

296

SECTION 11(C ): REGULATIONS FOR COURSE REGISTRATION

REGULATIONS FOR COURSE REGISTRATION

1. A student who has registered for a particular programme of study is required to register
for all the courses offered during the particular semester.

2. A student can only register for courses offered in any particular semester depending on
the stipulated requirements. A student cannot register for a course that is not offered
in any particular semester.

3. Every course taken in a particular semester should be registered correctly and
completely by stating the course code, the number of course credits and the status of
the course, whether it is reset for grade or repeat course

4. A student will be awarded zero mark for the particular course if there are any mistakes
in the registration of the course ration.

5. Any course which is repeated by students should be registered with ’R’ status.

6. The original code of the course should be used for the purpose of registering a repeated
course.

7. Course registration should be done ’online’ based on the advice and guidance from the
student’s Academic Advisor.

8. The student should print and submit a copy of the registration Course Slip to his/her
Academic Advisor.

9. A student is required to do Pre-Registration for the course ’online’ within TWO (2) weeks
before the end of the current semester as stipulated by WUC.

10. Course registration will be carried out for TWO (2) working days before the semester
starts or on the dates determined by WUC through’ online’ portal.

11. A student can make corrections to the earlier registration (pre-registration) within 2
weeks after the semester starts. This correction includes adding, dropping and
correcting codes, and course’s status.

12. Matters 7, 8 and 9 above will be carried out ‘online’ by following procedures laid down
for each matter.

297

13. For any registration/ correction made after the final date, a fine of RM50.00 will be
imposed for each course with a maximum RM200.00. The final registration date for this
’fine’ registration is at the end of the THIRD (3) week of each semester.

14. Any late registration or corrections to the course registration after the THIRD (3) week
of the semester will not be accepted except for valid reasons acceptable by WUC.
Depending on the last date of the last week (fourth week) of the semester, a penalty of
RM 200.00 will be imposed for any late registration/ late correction for every
application.

15. The Course Registration Slip should be printed and kept by every student after
registration/ correction of course registration and one copy should be given to the
Academic Advisor.

16. The student should check and ensure all the information stated in the Course
Registration Slip is correct. Any mistakes in the slip should be corrected according to the
rules, requirements and duration as stipulated in 10 and 12 above.

17. Student can apply Dropping Course (DC) for any registered course in a particular
semester. Application for Dropping Course (DC) should be done via ’online’ starting from
the FOURTH until NINTH week in every semester. After this period, application for
Dropping Course will not be accepted.

18. Course Registration should be done according to procedures set out by WUC.
Registration carried out without following the procedures will not be accepted or
considered.

19. Except for reasons acceptable to WUC, if a student fails to carry out Course Registration
within the stipulated period stated above, he/she will have his/her course of study
postponed provided it does not exceed the stipulated duration of study.

298

SECTION 11(D): REGULATIONS FOR CREDIT EXEMPTION

REGULATIONS FOR CREDIT EXEMPTION
CREDIT EXEMPTION

1. Credit Exemption is credit that is given exemption during the application process to
enter a certain course based on the earlier achievement or evaluation result in the
particular course. Credit Exemption is not given for certificate level courses or its
equivalent. .

2. A student who changes a programme/ course of study whether in WUC or from other
Institute of Higher Learning (IHL)/ other programme can apply for credit exemption.
WUC will decide courses that can be given Credit Exemption.

3. Credit Exemption is not allowed for a programme/course of study for which a
diploma/degree has been obtained in a field and level which is equivalent from other
(IHL).

4. Limit for Credit Exemption given should be less than 50% of the total credit required for
graduation for the programme / course of study.

5. Application for Credit Exemption should be made to WUC through Faculty’s Dean and
the application process should be settled in the SECOND (2) week of the first semester
of the studies.

299

SECTION 11(E ): REGULATIONS FOR CREDIT TRANSFER

CREDIT TRANSFER

1. Credit Transfer is given to a student who took and passed a course in any equivalent to
that which is recognized by the government for the duration of study at WUC.

2. The course for which credit transfer is applied for should be equivalent to and fulfill the
needs of the curriculum of the courses which are being followed.

3. The limit for Credit Transfer allowed from other institution should be more than 30% of
the overall total credits for graduation but not more than 17 credits for each IPT.

4. Credit Transfer which is approved will be taken into account in the calculation of the
GPA and CGPA.

5. A student is not allowed to complete the final semester of the studies at another
institution using the Credit Transfer facility.

6. Only a student whose registration status is active can use the Credit Transfer facility.

7. The application to get Credit Transfer from other institution should be made within the
duration of ONE semester before following the Credit Transfer programme

Regulation for Exemption and Credit Transferring

Student who takes up WUC programmes can apply for Credit Exemption and / or Credit Transfer
for a particular course based on the stipulated rules and regulations.

I. Passing Grade

II. The minimum grade to obtain Credit Exemption is Grade C based on the
grading system of WUC.

III. The minimum grade to obtain Credit Transfer is a Pass Grade which is set
by WUC

Credit Value

Courses which are given Credit Exemption and Credit Transfer should be on par with the
evaluation system and the curriculum of the courses of study at WUC from the perspectives of
calculating the academic weightage and credit value.

300

Course Content and Course Curriculum

1. Course content which is given Credit Exemption and Credit Transfer should be
equivalent to or not less than 80% of the related course content at WUC.

2. Approval for Credit Exemption and Credit Transfer is only given for courses in
programmes recognized by the JPA /MQA.

3. Total combinations of transfer should not be more than 50% of the total overall credit
required for graduation for certain courses of studies

4. Courses which are given Credit Exemption and Credit Transfer will be announced and
recorded in the students’ academic records.

5. Approval for Credit Exemption and Credit Transfer will be given by WUC based on the
certification by the University Academic Board (UAB) and final approval of the University
Senate.