22. Herman, E.A., ed. Die Casting                33. Cook, G.E. "Through-the-Arc Sensing
    Handbook. River Grove, Illinois: Society         for Arc \'Velding." Proceedings of 10111
    of Die Casting Engineers (1982): p 3·1.          Conference un Production Research and
23. Roberts, G., G. Krauss and R. Kennedy.           Tecllnolosr !Detroit, Ml,
    Tool Steels, fifth edition. Materials Park,       February-March 1983]. VVarrendale,
     011: ASM International (1998).
                                                     PA: Society of Automotive Engineers
24. TS-497. Allo)' Digest. Orange, NJ: Alloy          (1983): p 141-151.
     Digest Incorporated (March 1989).           34. Agapakis, J.E., j.M. Katz, M. Kollman,
25. TS-493. Al/o)' Digest. Orange, Nj: Alloy         G.N. Epstein, j.M. Friedman1 D.O.
                                                      Eyring and H.]. Rutishauser. "joint
     Digest Incorporated (October 1988).             Tracking and Adaptive VVelding Using
26. Metallic Materials Specification
                                                     Vision Sensing of the \•Veld Joint
    Handbook, third edition. Fakcnham,               Geometry." 1Velding joumal. Vol. 65,
    United Kingdom: Fakenham Press                   No; 11. Miami, FL: American \Velding
     Limited (1980).                                 Society (November 1986): p 33-41.
27. Metals Handbook, eighth edition:             35. Goldberg, F. "Inductive Seam Tracking
    Vol. 1. Materials Park, OH: ASM                   Improves tvJechanized and Robotic
                                                     \'\1elding." International Conference on
     International [formerly American                Automation and Robolisation in H'eldins
    Society for lv!etals] (1972): p 957.             and Allied Processes [Strasbburg, Fwnce,
28. Prystay, ivf., H. \o\7ang and                    September 1985] (1985): p 393-400.
    A. Garcia-Rejon. A11 pplications of
    Themographic Temperature                     36. Richardson, R.\o\7• "Robotic Weld Joint
                                                     Tracking Systems -Theory and
     Measurements in Injection Moulding'             Implementation Methods." H'e/ding
    and Blow Moulding of Plastics."                  joumal. Vol. 65, No. 11. 1vfiami, FL:
    Tllermosense XVIII: An Intemational
    Couference on Thermal Sensing and                American \Velding Society (November
    lmasing Diagnostic Applications                   1986): p 43-51.
     [Orlando, FL, April 1996]. SPIE
                                                 37. Chin, B.A., N.H. Madsen andj.S.
     Proceedings, Vol. 2766. Bellingham,
    \o\7A: International Society for Optical          Goodling. "Infrared Thermography for
                                                     Sensing the Arc \"'eiding Processes."
     Engineering (1996): p 5.                        1Velding Journal. Vol. 62, No.9. Mi<m1i,
29. Prystay, M., C.A. Loong and                       FL: American \o\7elding Society
                                                      (September 1983): p 227-234.
    K. Nguyen. "Optimization of Cooling
    Channel Design and Spray Patterns in         38. Chin, B.A., N.H. Madsen and ].S.
    Aluminum Die Casting Using Infrared               Goodling. "Infrared Thermography
    Thermography." Thermosense X FIJI: An            Shows Promise for Sensors in Robotic
    International Conference on Thermal              \•Velding.'1 Robotics Today. Vol. 5, No. 1.
    Seming and Imagins Diagnostic                     Dearborn, MI: Society of
    Applications [Orlando, FL, April 1996].           ~vfanufacturing Engineers (February
    Vol. 2766. Tllermosense X \fill [Orlando,
                                                      1983): p 85-87.
     FL]. Bellingham, \VA: International         39. Brliggemann, G. Analyse
    Society for Optical Engineering                  Thermographiscller Rilddaten zur on-line
    (1996): p 15.                                    Qualitiitssicllenmg beim Schweificn von
                                                     Stiil1len mit Konlinuierlicher
30. Nagarajan, S. and B.A. Chin. "Infrared           Laserstrallltmg [Analysis uf
    Image Analysis for On-Line                       Thermograpllical Image Data for Ou-Line
    ~vfonitoring of Arc 1vHsalignment in             Quality Assurance at Laser lVdding of
    Gas Tungsten Arc VVelding Processes."            Steels Using Continuous Laser Radiation).
    Materials Eraluation. Vol. 48, No. 12.
    Columbus, OH: American Society for                In German. Ph.D. thesis. Magdeburg,
                                                      Germany: Magdeburg University
    Nondestructive Testing (December                  (1998).
     1990): p 1469-1472.                         40. Seyffarth, P. "Aspects of the
31. Green, D.R. 11 Experimental
                                                      Weldability of Mild Steel." Stli
    Electro-Thermal Method for                       European Couference 011 Laser Treatment
    Nondestructively Testing \Velds in
    Stainless Steel Pipes." Materials               of Materials: ECLAT 94 [Bremen,
    Emluation. Vol. 37, No. 11. Columbus,
    OH: American Society for                          Germany] (1994): p 83-93.
    Nondestructive ·resting (October             41. EN 100271 Designation Systems fOr
     1979): p 54-60.                                 Steels. European Standard. Brussels,
32. Green, D.R. and J.A. Hassberger.                  Belgium: European Committee for
    "Infrared Electro-Thermal Examination             Standardization.
    of Stainless Steel." Mataials Evaluation.    42. Niemann, H. Klassifikation l'UII Moslem
    Vol. 35, No. 3. Columbus, OH:                    [Classification o{Pattems]. In German.
    American Society for Nondestructive
                                                      Berlin, Germany: Springer (1983).
    Testing (March 1977): p 39-43, 50.
                                                 43. Haralick, R.M. and L.G. Shapiro.
                                                     Computer and Robot Vision. Heading,
                                                      MA: Addison- Wesley (1992).
486 Infrared and Thermal Testing
44. Okamoto, Y. and T. Inagaki. Remote
    Sensing Thermal Image Method. Tokyo,
    japan: Corona Publisher (1995):
    p 146-173.
45. lnagaki, T., C. Liu, I. Miyata and Y.
    Okamoto. "Detection of Flashing
    Temperature of Dry Friction Interface
    by h,feans of Infrared Radiometer."
    Qua11titalh'e lnfimed Thennography:
    QIRT '96. Eurotherm Seminar No. SO
    )Stuttgart, Germany, September 1996).
    Pisa, Jtaly: Edizione ETS (1997):
    p 324-330.
46. Sato, (vf., K. Kato, 'J: \'\1aterai, K.
    Miyata, T. Inagaki andY. Okamoto.
    "Detection of High-Temperature Spots
    on Reciprocating Interface under Dry
    Friction by Means of an Infrared
    Radiometer." Thermosense X\1111: An
    lntematimwl Cunfi.'reHce on '111emwl
    Seming and Imagiog Diagnostic
    Applimtions [Orlando, FL, April 1996).
    SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 2766.
    Bellingham, V·lA: International Society
    for Optical Engineering (1996):
    p 295-306.
47. Bo·wden, EP. and D. Tabor. The Friction
    and Lubrication of Solids, Part 1.
    Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford
    University Press (1950): p 31-50.
48. Inagaki, T., M. Sato and Y. Okamoto.
    "Thermal Visualization Study of
    Friction and Its Interface." Proceedings
    of tile 3rd lVorld Conference on
    Experimental Heal Transfer/ Fluid
    Mechanics and Thermodynamics
    [Honolulu, HI, November 1993].
     Vol. 1. New York, NY: Elsevier Science
    (1993): p 739-744.
49. Sato, 1vf ., T. lnagaki, K. ~vfiyata and Y.
     Okamoto. 11 Heat Transfer and
    Temperature Field of Rotating Friction
    Interface." Third Body Concept:
    Inte1pretati011 ofTribological PlleiW111CIW.
     Proceedings of 22nd Leeds-Lyon
    Symposium on Tribology [Lyon,
    France, September 1995]. New York,
    NY: Elsevier Science (1996): p 1-8.
SO. Parker, B. and L. Baughman. "Metal
     Assembly Thermography." ASNTs
    Infrared Tllermograplly Topical
    Conference !Cleveland, 01-J]. Columbus,
     OH: American Society for
     Nondestructive Testing (June 1997):
     p 23-27.
51. Rhinehart, D. and K. Henderson.
     "Press Room Thermography." ASNTs
    Infrared 11wrmograplly Topical
    Conference !Cleveland, OH). Columbus,
     OH: American Society for
     Nondestructive Testing (June 1997):
    p 31-33.
                                                                                  Infrared and Thermal Testing of Metals 487
CHAPTER
Aerospace Applications
           of Infrared and
          Thermal Testing
                      Robert L. Crane, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright
                      Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
                      Tommaso Astarita, Universita degli studi di Napoli
                      "Federico II/' Naples, Italy (Part 5)
                      Harold Berger, Industrial Quality, Incorporated,
                      Gaithersburg, Maryland (Part 4)
                      Gennaro Cardone, Universita degli studi di Napoli
                      "Federico II," Naples, Italy (Part 5)
                      Giovanni M. Carlomagno, Universita degli studi di
                      Napoli "Federico II," Naples, Italy (Part 5)
                      Thomas S. jones, Industrial Quality, Incorporated,
                      Gaithersburg, Maryland (Part 4)
                      Matthew D. Lansing, National Aeronautics and Space
                      Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama
                      (Parts 1 and 2)
                      Samuel S. Russell, National Aeronautics and Space
                      Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama
                      (Parts 1 and 2)
                      james L. Walker, National Aeronautics and Space
                      Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama
                      (Parts 1 and 2)
                      Gary L. Workman, University of Alabama, Huntsville,
                      Alabama (Parts 1 and 2)
PART 1. Infrared Thermography of Space Shuttle
and Related Aerospace Structures
The nondestructive testing of aerospace         bonded together with a resin or braze.
structures creates many challenges              These types of structures require a
because of the exceptional demands on           particularly difficult test in that the skins
the materials and processes used. The           have a high or anisotropic in·plime
structures are generally large and complex      thermal conductivity that can distort the
in design and have limited accessibility.       thermal image of the discontinuity below
Infrared thermal imaging provides a             it. Another problem is that metal face
useful test method for these types of           sheets often have a specular (mirrorlike or
structures because it is a noncontact           highly reflective) surface that greatly
method, can detect discontinuities at           inhibits the flow of radiant heat into the
moderate depths and can image                   structure as well as being an inefficient
reasonably large coverage areas.                radiator that yklds poor infrared images.
                                                Techniques are described which1 when
   Aerospace examples covered below             permitted, increase surface emissivity and
include leak testing of the space shuttle       absorptivity by dulling surface reflections
main engine nozzle and tubing sections,         and increase the ability of the surface to
composite nose cone structures,                 radiate heat to a usable leveL
composite propellant fuel tanks on launch
vehicles and metal honeycomb core and              The results of thermographic tests are
skin assemblies.                                often very subjective and strongly affected
                                                by surface conditions, material properties
   Composite materials are used in large        and the experience of the test conductor.
primary aerospace structures in launch          Test panels or calibmtiou standards built
vehicles, such as spars1 aeroshells and fuel    ·with artificial discontinuities that
tanks after many years serving only as          resemble true critical sized discontinuities
structurally noncritical components.            can be inspected along with the actual
These composite structures offer a unique       structure under test to ensure that a given
set of characteristics that make the            testing process will find all critical sized
detection of structural and material            discontinuities. The true measure of a
discontinuities very important.                 calibration reference standard, ·with its
Composites are designed to be highly            built~in discontinuities, is that it be
efficient in highly stressed situations. It is  thermally similar to that of the actual
often very difficult to predict exactly what    structure and that its artificial
influence a discontinuity will have on          discontinuities react as real discontinuities
structural performance. The most                would in the article under investigation.
prominent types of discontinuities
occurring in composite aerospace                    All these tools, when used together,
structures include porosity, delaminations,     allow infrared thermal imaging to provide
disbands, fiber breakage and foreign            test capability where more traditional
material inclusion. Infrared thermography       nondestructive methods cannot provjde
is an ideal inspection tool for large           acceptable levels of performance. The
composite structures because these              following case studies illustrate how the
discontinuities show up as anomalous            method can be used with several types of
temperature observations across the             aerospace structures. However, there are
surfaces of the structures. Special             many more types of aerospace structures
considerations must be made to account          that have not been inspected using
for the variety of thermal properties of the    infrared thermal imaging. Applying these
materials used in the composite structure,      approaches for testing of other aerospace
which can make it hard to induce a              systems may provide interesting benefits.
uniform thermal load. \Vithout a uniform
reference the identification of critical        leak Testing with
discontinuities in complex composite            Thermography
aerospace structures- such as those
including honeycomb, syntactic foam or          Detecting leaks in pressure vessels or
aerogel cores as ·well as exotic matrix fiber   piping can be simple or extremely
combinations of metal and ceramic ~ can         challenging. If the vessel is geometrically
be very difficult.                              simple and unrestricted in access, a low
                                                pressme leak check using a liquid bubble
    Many applications exist in the              solution applied to the vessel with a brush
aerospace industry for structures that
feature metal skins and honeycomb core
490 Infrared and Thermal Testing
or bottle is usually adequate. Bubbles in      diverging nozzie and compressible gasse\
                                               supersonic flmv is possible if the internal
the leak check solution appear as a result     pressure of the contained gas is 1.893
of escaping gas and can even be used to 1      times the absolute outside pressure. Under
                                               normal atmospheric conditions this is a
estimate the leak rate.                        tank pressure of about 90 kPa (13 lbrin.-2
   launch vehicle pressure vessels include     gage). If the flow at the opening of the
                                               pressure vessel is sonic then for air the
fuel or oxidizer tanks, feed lines,            temperature drop may be as low as 244 K
                                               (~29 °C = -20 oJ;) for (I tank temperature of
tmbopump chambers, valves, combustion          293 K (20 oc = 68 of). If the geometry act>
                                               as a converging or diverging nozzle the
chamber coOling cavities and nozzles.          tempewture drop away from the leak if
Frequently these and other aerospace           supersonic will be even larger. Clearly
pressure vessels are so complicated that       using modern infrared cameras, if the
leaks cannot he located in inaccessible        flow is supersonic this effect ·wiJJ be a
                                               major factor in the detected temperature
areas. But if the vessel has a complicated     change.
geometry, restricted access, chemical             There may be good reasons not to use a
sensitivity or a large area, then an infrared  steady state condition during testing. An
                                               example of a transient test will be
video camera may be a good tool for            presented later. But for complex
identifying, locating and ranking leaks.       geometries during rapid pressurization,
                                               gasses contained in confined regions of
The temperature change caused by a leak        the vessel may be compressed by the
in a hidden area of a complex structure        pressure increase. \'\'ark is then done on
may be detected thermographically on an        this confined slug of gas by the incoming
outer surface. Also, infrared video cameras    gas. This causes a decrease in the volume
                                               of the slug and a corresponding
can test large areas very rapidly and          temperature increase.
without contacting the component.
                                                   For organic compound gasses or
   Several physical phenomena may be           saturated mixtures a phase change may
active at a leak and leak geometry is          contribute to the complexity of this
usually unknown and unpredictable. The         problem. Examples of these gasses include
leak may act like a throttle valve or a        refrigerant 134A, butane, propane and
                                               moist air. The temperature change because
nozzle or a combination of both. These         of one of the previous mentioned
may cause either heating or cooling. Also,     phenomena may cause a phase change.
                                               This phase change may absorb or release
transient effects including the                energy and cause a detectable temperature
pressurization of gas already in the vessel    change.
causes work on the trapped gas. For the            As an illustration of how leaks behave
detection of a leak, it is not always          thermally, a series of tests were performed
                                               on a single tube ·with a 0.13 mm
necessary to understand the leak process.      (0.005 in.) hole. The tube was painted flat
A local temperature change is simply           black, giving it an emissivity of about 0.85
detected. However, for leak location or        and imaged with a high resolution
                                               (256 x 256 pixels), high sensitivity
leakage rate approximation, it may be          (0.025 K [0.025 oc; 0.045 OF] per level)
                                               infrared camera. The tube was connected
necessary to understand the process. A         to a K bottle containing either nitrogen,
discussion of some of these and                argon, helium or carbon dioxide gas. The
                                               pressure regulator on the K bottle was set
competing effects follows.                     to deliver 276 kPa (40 lbrin.-2) gage and
   The joule-thompson effect is classically    was valved to provide that pressure to the
                                               tube in less than 2 s. To ensure that the
exhibited in flow through a throttling         gas in the tube ·was pure, the tube was
restriction. The flmv through the              purged for 5 minutes with a low pressure
                                               flow of the test gas. The infrared imager
restriction causes no work to be done and      was set to acquire images from before
is considered adiabatic. For real gasses,      pressurization to about 8 to 10 s after
                                               pressure initiation.
either the temperature can increase or
decrease depending on the type of gas,             Figure 1 presents a time-temperature
temperature and pressure. For each given       plot depicting the transient behavior of
gas there is a temperature (inversion          each gas. Each gas has its mvn unique
                                               thermal response (Tabk 1). First and most
temperature) at which no temperature           obvious, note how the nitrogen, argon
change occurs for the throttling process.      and carbon dioxide all increase in
This inversion temperature is a weak
function of temperature. Belnw the
inversion temperature the gas heats and
above the gas cools on throttling. This
critical temperature is below standard
conditions for hydrogen (202 K =- ~71 °C. =-
-96 "F) and helium (25 K =-248 "C =
~415 °F) and above standard conditions
for nitrogen (621 K =348 °C = 658 °F), air
(603 K =330 "C = 626 °F), argon (723 K =
450 oc = 842 °F) and carbon dioxide
(1500 K = 1227 oc = 2240 °F).
   A leak may occur in a region with a
flow cross section that geometrically
resembks a converging or diverging
nozzle. An example of this is a cooling
tube that has a crack that opens into a
confined region. For the converging or
                                               Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 491
temperature when pressure is first applied                                                                be produced as a result of manufacturing
          as opposed to the helium, which begins to                                                                 anomalies and the extreme service
          cool immediately. Secondly, notice that
          the nitrogen, argon and helium all show                                                                   environment. These discontinuities may
          some cooling after the pressure is applied                                                                lead to poor or incomplete bonding of the
          for a long period of time, whereas the
          carbon dioxide returned to room                                                                           tubes to the structural jacket, interstitial
          temperature.                                                                                              leaks and hot wall leaks.
          Interstitial leak Detection1                                                                                 Through the application of a bubbling
                                                                                                                    leak check solution and visual testing hot
          The National Aeronautics and Space
          Administration space shuttle main engine                                                                  wall leaks are easily detected. Tests for
          nozzles consist of over 1000 tapered
          coolant tubes brazed to a structural steel                                                                determining braze line integrity can he
          jacket (Fig. 2). The cold wall of the nozzle                                                              performed by standard X-ray practices
          is defined as its outer jacket surface
          whereas the inner, flame bearing, tube                                                                    and1 when the jacket is accessible, by flash
          surface is known as the llot wall. The                                                                    thermography. Here1 thermographic
          somewhat triangular gaps between the                                                                      techniques are used to address the
          round tubes and the flat jacket are called
          the interslitials. The diameter of the                                                                    detection, location and characterization of
          individual cooling tubes decreases from                                                                   interstitial leaks (J:ig. 2).
          the aft end to the forward end1 causing
          the interstitials to become smaller also.                                                                    The standard test for locating
          Discontinuities in the coolant tubes may                                                                  interstitial leakage is the application of
                                                                                                                    leak check solution in the openings where
                                                                                                                    the interstitials vent at the aft end of the
                                                                                                                    nozzle ·while the tubes are pressurized to
                                                                                                                    172.3 kl'a (25 lb1·in.-2) with gaseous
                                                                                                                    helium. \Vhen a leak is found1 it is
                                                                                                                    classified based on the bubbles formed/
                                                                                                                    per Table 21 and if the leakage is severe
FIGURE 1. Plot of time versus temperature shows transient behavior of leaks: (a) nitrogen; (b) argon; (c) helium; (d) carbon
dioxide.
(a)
                                                                                                                    (c)
l- ri _ , I .E 294.55 (21.40) [70.52]
                                                                                                                    G:'
 G 294.45 (21.30) [70.341
  L.. 294.35 (21.20) (70.16]
                                                                                                                    '-.. 295.65 (ZZ.50) [72.50} ,. -,- .                           ! ---I·,·--~~
                                                                                                                    G                               ··--+·----~- ··.. -
                                                                                                                            295.55 (22.40) {72.32)
                                                                                                                    "       295.45 (ZZ.30) [72.14}
                                  II                              1I                                                                                                        -
                                                            8ack~round
~ 294.25 (21.1 O) (69.98]                1\                                                                         ::.:: 295.35 (22.20) (71.96} .        ·- ' - -.··- -t -- -
                                                               ~i~n~;'_                                             E F- ---, . -ltiT 295.25 (22.10) [71.78} .
~'        294.15 (21.00) [69.80]         .\      .""· .,                                                                                               ... ___j__ _j Backgroumi i
i:.l'?    294.05 (20.90) [69.62]                           8 10 12                                                  ~ 295.15 (22.00) [71.60] ... : .~:. ~a.,~~-- ~~-.,_..,_"'··.:·'.t.. \{~-t·,t-N-<'·
                                  ·"'!" c            6
25_ 293.95 (20.80) (69.44]                                                                                          w 295.05 (21.90) [71.42]                   ,...~--1-- Signal                        ·
E 293.85 (20.70) (69.26]                                                                                            ~       294.95 (21.80) {71.241  --~ -----r---r~·~···......w;.,_o..w...~
                                                                                                                            294.85 (21.70) (71.06]
{" 0 z 4                                                                                                                                            - ·- - - - L _ _~- -L __ _j _ _ •
                                                                                                                                                    0 2 4 6 8 10 12
          ,_295.75 (22.60) [72.68]               Time (s)                                                           (d) Time (s)
(b)                                                                                                                 E JK j '-296.15
          295.55 (22.40) [72.32]                       --Background                                                 LL 296.35 (23.20) (73.76] ~···-.-·    -1,  -         -  T-     ·--~-;---.--' -, ---,~
   G:'                                                                                                        ·-~.  L 296.25 (23.10) {73.58] ----:-·-
          -295.35 (22.20) [71.96}                                                                                                                                              .·
 2:e.__.                                                             Signal                                         r ·· - t:·--t·· -i:::0:::: 296.05 (22.90) [73.22}
                                                                                                                          295.95 (22.80) [73.04]
    ~                                                          I                                                            (23.00J    [73.401      1          - • LBac-kg-~io-un-d-::I
     ~'
                                                    6 8 10 lZ                                                                                       1  -rr-··.-·-~~;1;-:~~-~-··-·-±-~·,~:,.~'·~·~~',.: ..r v'~.;~~·t..;...-=.-'-1--~:1
   .3
          295.15 (22.00) (71.60)  1\                                                                                     l::-~ ;~~:~~ ~~;:~~~ ~;~::~~
     ~    294.95 (21.80) {71.24)                                                                                         r"'·2£ 295.65 (22.50) {n.so1
     ~    294.75 (21.60) [70.88]    ·~
   E      294.55 (21.40) (70.52]                                                                                         E 295.55 (22.40) [72.32} - -
                                           0 24                                                                          ~ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
   {"
                                                 Time (s)                                                                                                      Time (s)
TABLE 1. Thermal behavior of leaks (see Fig. 1). Conversion factor: 1 K = 1 oc = 1.8 oF.
                 Nitrogen                               Argon                                                                Helium        Carbon Dioxide
          Source Background                  ---·                                                                   Source Background  Source Background
            l>K l>K                                                                                                   l>K l>K            6K M
                                              Source Background
                                                l>K l>K
Peak       0.413  0.089                       0.409        0.074                                                    -0.822  -0.024      0.556           0.049
End       -0.148  0.069                      -0.207        0.020                                                                       -0.034           0.158
492 Infrared and Thermal Testing
enough then the tubes in the suspected        of the geometry and loCation of the
                    region are cut open and examined with a       discontinuities, eddy current and visual
                    borescope. Because the borescopc can
                    only cover a finite tube length and                                                                        1
                    because it is impossible to identify which
                    tube (to the right or left of the identified  tests are not possible.
                    interstitial} is leaking, many superfluous       Thermographic techniques, on the
                    tube cuts and repairs must be made to fix
                    just one leak. Also, the size of the          other hand, are we11 suited to locate
                    discontinuity creating the leak may make      interstitial leaks by measuring, from the
                    it impossible to see the source point. In     hot wall or cold wall side of the nozzle,
                    certain instances when the interstitials are  the localized cooling created !Jy an
                    interlinked by poor braze bonding, many       escaping gas at the loe<ttion of an
                    interstitials will show indications of        interstitial discontinuity. Hot wall tests are
                   leakage although there is a single source.     preferred because 100 percent of the
                                                                  interstices can be inspected. Cold wall
                        The small size of the tube wall cracks    tests are restricted to the open bays
                    causing these leaks and the large size of     between the hat bands and away from the
                    the nozzle inhibit the ability to locate      liquid hydrogen feed lines. \.Yhen the test
                    them using X-radiography, ultrasonic          is performed from the inside hot wall of
                   testing or computed tomography. Because        the nozzle a personnel lift supporting a
                                                                  pan/tilt apparatus placed on a tripod is
FIGURE 2. Space shuttle main engine nozzle.                       used (Fig. 3). This technique keeps
                                                                  personnel outside the confined space of
  l~..,.. I                                                       the nozzle during pressurization,
                                                                  eliminating the risk of suffocation.
  '"~~"""'""
                                                                     In general, the as-fired finish on the
                Hot wall side Coolant tubes                       inside of the nozzle has a sufficiently high
                                                                  and uniform emissivity for the thermal
                                                                  tests. In regions that have prior repairs, a
                                                                  nearly mirror finish greatly inhibits the
                                                                  thermal test. To overcome this problem, a
                                                                  water soluble flat black paint or chalk
                                                                  powder (such as liquid penetrant
                                                                  developer) must be applied. The desired
                                                                  result is a surface emissivity of about 0.85.
                                                                      tvlany experiments were performed to
                                                                  assess the ability to identify the location
                                                                  and severity of a interstitial leaking from
                                                                  the hot wall side of the nozzle.
                                                                  Preliminary experiments have indicated,
                                                                  as expected, that the peak pressure
                                                                  achieved durjng testing influences the
                                                                  cletectability of a given discontinuity. This
                                                                  influence is characterized as a near linear
                                                                  increase in discontinuity thermal contrast
                                                                  with increased peak pressure. The
                                                                  discontinuity thermal contrast is
                                                                  determined by computing the
                                                                  temperature differenti,:ll between a
                                                                  discontinuity region and an acreage
                                                                  region. The results arc shown in I:ig. 4 for
                                                                   FIGURE 3. Thermal imager inside nozzle.
TABlE 2. Flow rate of detected leakage.
leak               Flow Rate             Description
Class
       ~---------~--~
       std cm3·s-1 (std in.3·mln-1)
       >0.3 >2                       foaming
2      0.3 to 0.5  2 to 50           bubbling
3 14               50to100           strong bubbling that
                                        bursts and reforms
4 >27              >100              blowing (bubbles that
                                       do not persist)
                                                                  Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 493
typical class 2 and class 3 interstitial leaks                could produce a false indication of a leak.
in the lower (•nd of the nozzle.                              Calculations show that the largest flow
                                                              rate expected for a nozzle leak check is
   The thermograms in Fig. 5 clearly                          below 12.2 m·s- 1 (2400 ft·minutes- 1). Two
demonstrate the need for higher gas                           weld repair restrictions were fabricated by
pressures to be able to uniquely identify                     opening the tubing, applying braze to the
the leak source. Jn the figure, the class 3                   bottom of the hole and then welding the
leak appears as a large cool (dark) region
just above the upper repair patch. The                        tubes closed. Nitrogen gas was flowed
class 2 leak is not visible at 172 kPa (25                    through the tubes and its velocity
lbrin.-2 gage) yet is clearly visible above
                                                              measured with a hot wire anemometer at
the lmver repair patch at 310 kPa (45                         a distance of 3.18 mm (0.125 in.) from
lbrin.-2 gage).
                                                              the tube opening. The tests demonstrated
   To investigate the effect of gas type on                   that the flow rate threshold for thermal
the ability to resolve the discontinuity                      detection of a 50 percent area restriction
size along the length of the nozzle, a                        is above 12.2 m·s-1 (2400 ft·minutes- 1).
series of tests were performed on a panel                     That is, below 12.2 m-s~1 (2400
representative of the forward (small tube)
end of the nozzle and a panel                                 ft-minutes-1) the signature of the
representative of the aft (larger tube) end.
                                                              restriction is too small for repeatable
The results (Fig. 6) indicate that in the
forward end of the nozzle, helium gas                         detection. Based on these findings it is
works the best for identifying leaks.                         highly unlikely that a restriction alone
However, in the aft end of the nozzle,                        would create a false positive signature
when helium is used a small class 2 leak
cannot be resolved. Instead the best                          during a thermal test of the nozzle.
                                                                 Flow rate has also been found to affect
results are attained when nitrogen or
argon gas was used.                                           how much of a thermal signature is
                                                              produced for each gas. In general a
   Tests were also conducted to determine
if the blockage associated with a repair                      pressure transient requiring less than 8 s
                                                              to reach 265 kPa {40 lbrin.-2 gage), that is,
                                                              35 kPa (,) lbf'in.-2 gage), produces the best
FIGURE 4. Thermal response as function of pressure.           fiGuRE 6. Forward end of nozzle.
0.12 (0.22) ~----------_..                                    i     1.0 (1.80)
                                                                    0.8 (1.44)
30.1 o                                                        3
0.08                                                          ~
(0.18)  11---------~---=c:-;1-;.,-:,-~-:-:--:-_--_-~___.._d'
(0.14)                                                        ~G:'
                                                              2E'p-- 0.6 (1.08)
1 2o.o6 (O.ll) 1---.--/-~"""=---c--,-,---__.--~"'
                                                              ~II 0.4 (0.72)
0.04 (0.07) ,j,...C::_ _ _____.o--___'=~"""'==--
                                                              ""'~ 0.2 (0.36)
0.02 (0.04) ~~--~,c-:::__ _ _ __
                                                              w
172 241                                              310                         Nitrogen  Argon  Helium
                                                     (45)     "' 0
(25) (35)
          Pressure, kPa (lbrin.-2)                            0
                                                              legend
                                                              R=Ciass3
                                                              0"'-Class2
FIGURE 5. Thermograms at three pressure levels: (a) 172 kPa (25 Jb,-in.-2 gage); (b) 241 kPa
(35Jb,.in.-2 gage); (c) 310 kPa (45Jb1-in.-2 gage).
(a) (b) (c)
494 Infrared and Thermal Testing
thermal gradient. The exception to the            from the cold wall side. Here, just as with
rule is found for carbon dioxide, which           the hot wall tests the nozzle is pressurized
was unaffected by pressurization rate and         to 276 kPa {40 lbrin.-2 gage) in less than
testing with carbon dioxide could be
performed with ramp times in excess of            10 s. As seen in Fig. 7, a better thermal
40 sat 7 kPa·s· 1 (I Ib,.in.-2 gage per           signature is given ·when the cold wall side
second). The only factor limiting the             is inspected. The primary reason for this is
ramp time for carbon dioxide is the               that the cold wall (metal jacket) side is
in-plane conductivity of the nozzle itself.
                                                  much smoother than the hot wall side
   An investigation into the ability to test      (exposed tubing) side and as such gives
tlle interstitials from the outer jacket side
of the nozzle was also performed. \".'hen         less background thermal aberrations. The
accessible the jacket of the nozzle               primary problems with performing all
provides an excel1ent surface to view the
effect of an interstitial leak. Instead of the    cold wall side tests are the inability to
thermal effects having to flow around the
tubing to the hot waH side, by viewing            easily transfer indication locations to an
the jacket a more direct thermal path is          individual tube and the preseilce of the
attained.
                                                  hat bands, a structural reinforcement, and
   Tests performed on a forward and aft           miscellaneous tubing that block some
section of the nozzle clearly demonstrate
the ability of thermography to locate leaks       inspection sites.
                                                     In summary it was determined that for
FIGURE 7. Cold wall inspection: (a) aft end of
nozzle; (b) forward end of nozzle. Conversion     a test to be successful the operating
                                                  pressure must be greater than 276 kPa
factor (M): 1.0 K ~ 1.0 oc ~ 1.8 °F.              (40 lbrin.-2 gage) and the pressure rate in
                                                  excess of SO kPa (8 lbrin.·2 gage) per
(a)
                                                  second. Carbon dioxide gas was found to
I!T = 0.06 K = 0.06 "C (0.11 ~F)                  give the best thermal indications of a
>- ,,,,.,- ·::..:t-  ~, ~. ·,,_,.:;,;:!  > """'~  class 2 or greater leak. A gas temperature
                                                  slightly beJo·w ambient was required to get
                             "-·-                 the desired thermal gradient and an
                                                  ambient temperature of 293 to 304 K
                                                  (20 oc to 31 °C; 68 op to 88 °F) was
                                                  required. It was determined that the
                                                  spatial resolution must permit
                                                  identification of individual tubes and the
                                                  infrared imager needs to have a thermal
                                                  resolution of at least ±0.025 K
                                                  (0.025 oc ~ 0.045 °F) per level. Finally, a
                                                  surface emissivity of 0.8 or greater was
                                                  required to allow detection of the thermal
                                                  gradient produced by the leak.
                                       Composite Aerospace
                                       Structures
                                                             After many years serving only structurally
                                                             noncritical ·applications in launch
                                                             vehicles, composite materials are now in
                                                              primary structures such as spars,
                                                              aeroshells and fuel tanks. Composites
(b) offer a unique set of characteristics that
                                                             make the detection of structural and
                                                              material discontinuities very important.
                                                              By their very nature, composites are used
                                                              in highly efficient, highly stressed
                                                             situationS. It is often very difficult to
                                                             determine exactly what influence a
                                                           discontinuity will have on structuml
                                                              performance. The most prominent types
                                                             of discontinuities seen in aerospace
                                                             composites include porosity,
                                                             delamination, disbond, fiber breakage and
                                                             foreign material inclusion.
                                                                 Excess porosity reduces the compressive
                                                              load carrying capability of most
                                                             composite systems by leaving fibers
                                                          unsupported. Jt can also serve as a
                                                              location for moisture to collect, which
                                                              can degrade the mechanical properties of
                                                  Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 495
somt: resins or lead to freeze or thaw       the material thickness, it may he
related problems. Disbands are of            necessary to test the inner and outt:r
particular concern in regions precured       bands of overlaid material separately. In
and tl1en bonded together. An improperly     the case of a closed structure, .'IUch as a
designed joint or one with surface           fuel tank, access to the interior band must
contamination can lead to a disband.         be provided for personnel and equipment
Delamination, a phenomenon similar to a      (Fig. 8). Sufficient access ports must he
disband, occurs when the plies of a          included in the structural design.
composite separate. Typically,
delaminations are the result of low             Because disband deLectability by
strength in the resin, contamination         thermography decreases with depth,
between plies, impact loading or localized   discontinuity standards may be required
imbalances in the stresses between plies.    to demonstrate detection capability for
Inclusions, foreign matter trapped within a  design critical disband sizes through the
composite, can reduce strength by kinking    entire thickness of the overlaid material
the fibers around the inserted material or   with the infrared thermographic
creating a disband between the plies. Fiber  technique to be used. Figure 9 is a
breakasc as a result of an impact or stress  thermogram or thermographic image of
concentration is normally considered the     such a discontinuity standard having four
worst form of damage because the load        overlaid layers, stepped up from the
carrying capability of the structure is      substrate material at the left and right
directly affected.                           edges to a maximum thickness in the
                                             center. Simulated disbands of various sizes
Postcure Bondline Thermal                    are included between the substrate and
Testing
                                             FIGURE 9. Splice joint discontinuity reference
Large composite structures may he            standard thermographic result:
fabricated in smaller pieces that arc then   (a) thermogram; (b) diagram.
bonded together. This manufacturing
technique provides the capability for a      (a)
larger final structure than that which the
capacity of curing facilities (ovens,        (b)
autoclaves and others) \\'Ould othenvise
allow. For example, a large composite fuel        14.0 rnrn (0.55 in.)
tank may be fabricated similar to a pill
capsule by bonding two bullet shaped              - 1 1 . 0 mm (0.43 in.)~
halves together. Curing facilities thus
need only accommodate one half of the             -+-------9.0 mm (0.35 i n . ) -
tank at a time. A butt joint where the two
halves meet may be overlaid with                  ~~-7 0 mm (0.28 ;n.)+l
additional material on the inner and              !J
outer surfaces, stepping up in thickness to
facilitate load transfer across the joint         -
without excessive stress concentration.                   (50..200mirnn.)~
    Infrared thermography may be used in
such structures to detect many types of
discontinuities, including disbanded
regions in tlw overlaid joints. Because of
FIGURE 8. Thermographic evaluation of inner
splice joint on inside of large composite
tank.
                                                  0 00 0                    )      l
                                                  00 00                             E
                                                                                   E
                                                  00 0 0
                                                                                   0
                                                  00 00
                                                                                   "
                                                  00 0 0
                                                  00 00
496 Infrared and Thermal Testing
the first (deepest) overlaid layer (Fig. 9).   Thermal Testing of Impact
Flash heating was used for a one~sidcd test    Damage
in this example. The thermogram
demonstrates the detectability of all          Impact from dropped tools, mishandling
programmed discontinuity sizes at all          or flying debris can produce critical levels
material depths. For image interpretation,     of damage in composite structures with
the inspector also wants to know {1) the       little or no visible surface indications.
material and its diffusivity, {2) the          Although the impact may not even visibly
thickness of each layer and possibly           scratch the surface of the structure,
(3) the recording time after each pulse.       subsurface damage such as delamination,
                                               matrix cracking and even fiber breakage
In-Situ or Wet Bond line Thermal               may be present. Low velocity, low to
Testing2                                       medium energy blunt impacts are
                                               normally the cause of this kind of
It is often advantageous to identify the       damage} High velocity, high energy
presence of voids in a wet bond line           impacts tend to produce a noticeable
before final cure. At that stage, the joint    crater at the impact site and spalling on
may be worked mechanically to vent             the back side. Low energy impacts are
trapped air. \·Vhere that approach fails, the  simply absorbed by the composite and
joint may be disassembled and actions          their energy dissipated with little or no
may he taken to eliminate any geometric        influence on the integrity of the structure.
mismatch. In certain applications it is
possible to identify the presence of voids         In a study conducted on 6.35 mm
in a wet bond line with infrared               (0.25 in.) thick graphite phenolic samples
thermography before the two components         cut from a section of a test nose cone for
are finally cured together.
                                               FIGURE 10. Bondline thermograms: (a) before
    The thennograms in Fig. 10 illustrate      working; (b) after working.
the former procedure in the case of a          (a)
composite cap as initially wet bonded and
after being worked to remove entrapped         ==-=I~ mr--c·:rJ'C'+1ncw~
air. The caps were flash heated and viewed
during cool down. The images were taken        (b)
through the vacuum bag and a release ply.
The voids appear at higher temperatures
than the surrounding region,
demonstrating the lower heat conduction
of the void.
    Note in the images (l:ig. 10) the
presence of a fibrous bleeder material. The
purpose of the bleeder is to let air flow
out from under the vacuum bag as the
bag is puHed down against the cap.
\'\7ithout the bleeder material the vacuum
bag would form a partial seal around the
edges of the cap and restrict the vacuum
level in the center of the cap. The regions
·where the bleeder is present and where
the vacuum bag is held off of the cap
cannot be inspected thermographically
because of the lack of a heat path for
absorbing the heat of the thermal flash.
The bleeder cloth is an insulating layer. In
other words, any region where the
vacuum bag does not make direct contact
with the cap will not be able to be
inspected because there exists no direct
path for heat to travel to the surface of
the cap.
   It should also be noted that certain
bagging materials behave differently
thermographically and should be tested
before a bond is attempted. Because of the
inherent emissivity of some materials and
their natural insulating characteristics
certain materials commonly used for
composite manufacture may inhibit the
thermographic testing.
                                               Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 497
the space shuttle external tank the ability                    in-plane conductivity of the composite
to thermally image impact damage was                           material dominates the heat transfer in
demonstrated. In this study1 impacts at                        the structure blending away their details
various energy levels and with three slzf'~                    that were seen when the part was flash
of impact tips were used to determine                          heated. Because of the in-plane heat loss,
whether thermography could measure the                         identification of the true discontinuity
extent of damage in a flight structure. A                      boundary is very difficult. (Misleading
75 mm (3 in.) square test piece, cut from a                    cool zones can be caused by in-plane
section of the nose cone that was                              conduction also with the one-sided
trimmed off during production, was                             approach.)
struck by a 2.27 kg (5 Ibm) impactor in a
single bluw. Images were taken using both                      Detection of Porosity4
flash and the more traditional long
duration heat lamp thermography. The                           One part of the qualification of an
sizes of the discontinuities in the resulting                  aerospace structure for service invOlves
thermograms were then measured
(Table 3). The maximum and minimum                             FIGURE 11. Typical thermograms of high energy impact
discontinuity dimensions, as measured                          damage: (a) flash, impact side; (b) flash, back side;
from the impact side using flash heating,                      (c) through-heat. Conversion factor: 1.00 in. = 25.4 mm.
are given in the max and minutes columns                       (a) (b) (c)
respectively. The discontinuity
dimensions measured from flash heating                         FIGURE 12. Typical thermograms of low energy impact
the back (opposite to impact) side of                          damage: (a) flash, impact side; (b) flash, back side;
coupon are given in the column labeled                         (c) through-heat. Conversion factor: 1.00 in.= 25.4 rnm.
back. As a point of reference these results                    (a) (b) (c)
were compared to those obtained with the
more traditional long duration heating
thermography. Here1 a 1000 \-\1 infrared
lamp was used to heat the rear surface of
the specimen while images ·were collected
from the front (impact) side during the
cool down.
   The damage appears to follow the fiber
direction though the thickness of the
laminate (Figs. 11 and 12). From the front
surface the large delamination zones can
be seen to spiral a1;vay from the impact
site. \Vhen the side opposite the impact is
viewed a circular area of damage is seen.
These images illustrate the conical damage
region extending away from the impact
site. The damage is seen to be hotter
(whiter) than the surrounding material as
a result of heat being trapped on the front
surface by the subsurface delamination.
   The same damage zones show up as
cool zones when heated from the back
side and vie·wed from the impact side. The
TABLE 3. Impact damage area measurements.
           Impact Energy  - -T-up-Si-ze- -       Maximum         Minimum           Back            lamp
                          mm (in.)             mm (in.)        mm (ln.)       mm (in.)        mm (in.)
Part N·m (ft·lb,)
         5.95 (4.39)       6.35  (0.25)        15.24  (0.60)   15.24  (0.60)  23.37  (0.92)   26.67  (1.05)
2 17.06 (12.58)            6.35  (0.25)        66.55  (2.62)   37.59  (1.48)  54.10  (2.13)   47.50  (1.87)
3 13.78 (10.16)            6.35  (0.25)        40.64  (1.60)   27.43  (1.08)  42.16  (1.66)   36.83  (1.45)
4 4.53 (3.34)              1.59  (0.0625)      11.68  (0.46)   11.68  (0.46)  21.59  (0.85)   15.24  (0.60)
5 11.88 (8.76)             1.59  (0.0625)      23.11  (0.91)   23.11  (0.91)  35.56  (1.40)   22.61  (0.89)
6 7.03 (5.18)              1.59  (0.0625)      17.53  (0.69)   15.24  (0.60)  25.65  (1.01)   20.07  (0.79)
7 8.87 (6.54)              6.35  (0.25)        27.18  (1.07)   23.11  (0.91)  35.05  (1.38)   24.38  (0.96)
8 12.51 (9.22)            12.70  (0.50)        36.83  (1.45)   29.46  (1.16)  46.74  (1.84)   30.99  (1.22)
9 25.47 (18.78)            6.35  (0.25)        76.20  (3.00')  47.75  (1.88)  76.20  (3.00')  76.20  (3.00')
a. Damage extended to the edge of the sample.
498 Infrared and Thermal Testing
verifying that no discontinuities were            As previously discussed, one of the
created during the manufacturing process.      principle advantages of infrared
During manufacture it is possible that         thermography over conventional
regions \'·lithin the laminate may contaih     ultrasonic testing is that with
tiny entrapped air bubbles or porosity.        thermography large regions are viewed in
The porosity can come from many                each test operation as opposed to the
sources: degassing of contaminates (such       point-by-point coverage of ultrasonic
as oils and silicones); improper debulking,    testing. Also, no direct contact with the
leaving air trapped between the plies; or      structure is required with thermography,
poor ventilation restricting the removal of    such as the water coupling used with
any degassing of the panel, to name a few.     ultrasonic testing, therefore little
No matter what the source, porosity can        disassembly of the structure is required.
have a detrimental effect on the               One of the main disadvantages of
performance of the structure by leaving        thermography is that for a discontinuity
regions of unsupported fibers and points       to be detected it must interfere with an
of stress concentration. If the regions of     externally applied heat pulse in such a
porosity are large enough they may begin       way as to develop a change in the normal
to link to each other under stress and         surface temperature profile. A very tight
drastically weaken the load carrying           discontinuity or one that is thermally
capability of the fibers, especially when      similar to the surrounding material has
put under compressive forces. The              little chance of being detected. Moreover,
porosity can also fill with water over time    detection with the one-sided approach is
and if subjected to freeze/thaw conditions     difficult ·when the discontinuity is deeper
may begin to delaminate the composite          than half the total thickness.
laminate.
                                                  One potential application for
   The damage tolerance models and             thermography has been the test of the
geometry of the component under test           instrumentation rack shell for the
dictate the size of discontinuity that the     International Space Station. The racks
evaluation technique can identify.             under investigation are constructed from
Typically, discontinuities as small as         an autoclaved graphite epoxy ·with 18-ply
161 mm2 (0.25 in. 2) in area; over large       acreage regions building up to 22 plies in
acreage regions, tight compound radii and      the corners. A protective layer of fiberglass
thickness transition zones must be             provides the finish layer and serves as a
demonstrated to be detectable for a            indicator of inservice damage. The
evaluation technique to be considered.         fiberglass shows as white against the black
                                               graphite background ·when its surface is
   A part of the certification of a given      struck hard enough to produce significant
technique for inspecting a structure           internal damage. The discontinuities of
involves demonstrating that it can find        interest include voids, inclusions,
discontinuities of a given type and            delaminations and porosity with a critical
geometry at a given depth into a               area threshold of 161 nun2 (0.25 in.2)
laminate. The testing process is typically
validated by evaluating discontinuity             Two tests were performed to determine
standard reference panels built to the         the limits of thermographic
same specifications as the component           nondestructive testing for detecting
under test, except for the insertion of        porosity. First, a section of a rack with
artificially fabricated discontinuities. The   known porosity documented through an
artificial discontinuities are designed to     ultrasonic map was thermographically
closely match those most prevalent in the      examined. Second, a 24 ply monolithic
actual structure.                              test panel was created with simulated
                                               porosity of known size and depth into the
   The conventional method for                 laminate. The panel was constructed from
inspecting monolithic composite shells is      bidirectional graphite epoxy (22 plies) and
to perform a series of ultrasonic tests after  E-glass {two cover plies) using a
fabrication. Ultrasonic testing {UT) of        symmetric quasi isotropic layup schedule
100 percent of the structure typically can     similar to that of the actual racks. The
locate all critically sized discontinuities.   simulated discontinuities were sized
The disadvantage of ultrasonic testing is      around the critical area by using 6.4, 12.7,
that it is time consuming and requires         19.1 mm (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 in.) square
submersion of the stmcture in a water          regions yielding areas of 0.40, 1.61 and
tank during the scanning operation unless      3.63 cm2 (0.0625, 0.25 and 0.56 in. 2). The
laser ultrasonic testing is used. Therefore,   pattern of planned discontinuities is
the method is not suited for postflight or     shown in Fig. 13.
inservice inspections ~ that is, a flight
ready piece of hardware. Infrared                 The light gray regions in Fig. 13 depict
thermographic techniques on the other          where the simulated porosity microballum
hand have proven to be well suited for         (7.0 nm diameter h1sed silica Si02
the inspection of monolithic shell             spheres) were placed in the panel. The
structures in situ.                            dark gray regions in Fig. 13 are folded
                                               plastic backing material, 25 pm (0.001 in.)
                                               Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 499
thick polypropylene, used to simulate         ultrasonic plot can be seen on the
inclusions and disband areas. \·Vedge         thermography image.
shaped stainless steel shims, 150 Jllll
(0.006 in.) thick, were also inserted into       Using the discontinuity standard panel
the laminate to create void regions when      previously described tests ·were corh!uctcd
they were removed after cure and are          to determine the depth detection limits
visible at the bottom of the panel. The       on the thermal testing system. The
discontinuities were placed in five           resulting thermograms indicate that the
columns so that the depth of                  limits of the system are somewhere
inspectability could he investigated. The     between the second and third column of
discontinuities ·were placed between plies    discontinuities, that is, between the sixth
2-3, S-6, 11-12, 16-17 and 21-22.             and eleventh ply (out of 22 plies). Figure
                                              15 shows the discontinuities from the first
Porosity Tests                                column of the panel.
A section of a rack panel with known             The primary drivers behind a successful
porosity was inspected thermographically      thermal test lie in the ability to get heat
and compared against ultrasonic test
results. Hgure 14 shows that the              FIGURE 14. Comparison of porosity detected:
thermogram closely matches the pattern        (a) ultrasonic image; (b) thermogram.
of porosity in the ultrasonic image. In
Fig. 14 the porosity shows up as a dark       (a) (b)
patch for the ultrasonic image and as a
white (hotter} zone on the thermogram.
The single thermogram does not show all
the details of the ultrasonic image because
the porosity actually resides throughout
the thickness. The ultrasonic image
measures the complete thickness of the
panel whereas the thermogram shows
only the effects from a single slice of the
cross section. When several thennograms
are viewed over time, by rastering through
the scan history, most of the details in the
fiGURE 13. Fabricated test panel.
38 mm 75 mm 75 mnl 75 mm 69.9 mm 69.9 mm
(1.5 in.) (3.0 ln.) (3.0 in.) (3.0 in.) (2.75 in.) (2.75 in.)
1---1--1---------------1 1~1
 1 2 3 4 5 ] 38 mm (1.5 in.)
                 II
   • J 50 mm (2.0 ;n.)
"" • • "" ""~ ~ ~
                  Jso mm (2.0 ;n.)
                                                               J 50 mm (2.0 ln.)
fJ J_j _j f-.-1 f-.-1
                                                               48 mm (1.9 in.)
153cJ cJ cJ f-J f-J                                            mm (2.1 ;n.)
                                                               163 mm (2.5 ;n.)
                                                               }so mm (2.0 ;n.)
1--1-------------+11~
50 mm                             190 mm     63 mm
(2.0 in.)                         (7.5 in.)  (2.5 ln)
500 Infrared and Thermal Testing
into a structure uniformly and with          porosity and inclusions in this particular
sufficient intensity to create a temporary   graphite epoxy part. Porosity close to the
thermal imbalance around an anomaly as       surface was found to also he a good
well as to resolve those temperature         candidate for locadou with thermography.
variations. Although this graphite epoxy     '"'hen the porosity reached depths of six
structure· appeared dark and was thus        or more plies it is difficult to say with
expected to be a good absorber of light      confidence that it could he detected
and thermal energy, the surface was glossy   without some surface preparation of tht'
as manufactured and highly reflective.       racks. The application of a flat black,
Because of the high reflectivity1 even with  water wasl1able, paint made the porosity
a large heat pulse most of the energy is     at the midplane of the panel detectable.
reflected away from the panel. Possible      Finally, embedded inclusions and voids
solutions to this problem include spraying   were detectable down to about six plies
the surface with a flat black water soluble  into the laminate and deeper with the
paint, using peal ply during manufacture     addition of a dulling agent to the panel's
to dull the surface or increasing the        surface.
number of flash heat lamps (input heat
energy). Of these solutions, increasing the  FIGURE 16. Midply porosity viewed when test
number of heat lamps would have the          panel is painted flat black.
least effect on production time but would
require doubling the support hardware for
the thermographic testing. Dulling the
surface during manufacture with peal ply
would not be a likely choice because it
would mean reevaluating the structural
performance of the rack. The application
of a water washable paint appears to be
the best choice for increasing the surface
conductivity of the panel.
   As shown in Hg. 16, it is possible to
thermally penetrate to the midply of the
laminate by spraying the surface with a
water washable flat black paint. The
160 mm2 {0.25 in.2) square region of
porosity at the edge of detectability but
can be seen when the thermograms are
viewed in a series over time. Although
this technique would require that the
panel be inspected from both sides and
the rack be spayed with paint and cleaned
up after the inspection, it does
demonstrate the potential to test the racks
with thermography.
    Infrared thermography has been
demonstrated to be capable of detecting
FIGURE 15. Results from test panel.
                                             Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing SOl
PART 2. Applications to Metal Aerospace
Structures
:~v1any applications exist in the aerospace  discontinuity is on the heated side of the
industry where structures are built that     panel, the heat dissipates before it reaches
feature metal skins and core bonded          the core and is not conducted to the
together with a resin or braze. These types  viewing side of the panel, producing a
of structures present a particularly         cold region. Because the heat travels faster
problematic situation in that the skins      through the metal core than it does
have a high in-plane thermal conductivity    through the air, differentiating the
that can distort the thermal image of the    location of the source (discontinuity) is
discontinuity below it. Another problem      difficult.
is that the face sheets often have a
specular, mirrorlike, or highly reflective,  Metal Honeycomb Core
surface that greatly inhibits the flow of    Skin Assemblies
radiant heat into the structure as well as
obscuring portions of the image with the     A containment vessel featuring stainless
camera's reflection.                         steel skins over an aluminum core was
                                             inspected thermographically for
    The effects of the high in-plane         delaminations. The outer and inner
conductivity can be partially overcome by    surface of the vessel was painted with
using flash heating- that is, by applying    three light coats of a water
a brief heat pulse and by recording the      soluble/washable flat black paint. The
temperature field as soon as the heat front  inside of the vessel was inspected by using
has reached the tested interface. Flash      a thermography periscope (Fig. 17). In
heating generaHy produces the dearest        this configuration the vessel was heated
images with the sharpest contrast \Vhen      from the outside using a hand held
the discontinuities are viewed soon after    1000 \V infrared heat lamp. A grid pattern
the flash. Hmvever, the camera may still     was selected that enabled the vessel to be
be blinded by the flash and, by the time it  scanned in three axial rings of nine radial
recovers, the transient related to the       segments. A portable electric fan was used
location of the source (discontinuity) may   to cool the vessel back to ambient
be lost.                                     temperatures between each test.
    The problem with the highly reflective      The outside of the vessel \\'as scannt'd
surface finish of most metals can be often   without the periscope while the inside
be overcome by the application of a          was heated with the 1000 \V lamp. A
emissivity enhancing paint. For example,     typical thermogram from the structure
a water washable flat black paint may        shows a region with low bond integrity
often be applied to increase surface         (Fig. 18). The delamination appears cooler
emissivity. Two to three light coats of      (darker) than the surrounding good
paint will often provide enough dulling to   material and the core is not visible in the
block the reflection of the camera and       discontinuity region.
increase the surface emissivity to a usable
level.                                          To validate the test process, test panels
                                             were built with programmed
    Discontinuities in these types of
structures are usually of the form of        FIGURE 17. Inspection using infrared
missing cobond tape or braze integrity,      periscope.
which tends to lower the ability of the
core to transmit heat to the opposite side
face sheet, producing a hot (white) region
in the image. These types of
discontinuities may not be detectable to
flash heating if they are on the side
opposite the flash. In these situations,
through~thickness heating with a hand
held lamp may permit discontinuities
anywhere between the two faet·sheets to
be detected. \·Vhen the discontinuity is
nearest the camera side of the panel, the
missing cobond tape limits the flow of
heat to the viewing surface, producing a
cold (dark) region. \·Vhen the
502 Infrared and Thermal Testing
delaminations formed by removing                by the flame resulting in a catastrophic
sections of the cobond adhesive. The            failure. It is thus necessary that the braze
planned discontinuitles could be sef:'n         line integrity be verified.
from either side of the panel and
differentiation between which side was             Traditional methods1 such as
closest to the discontinuity was difficult if   radiogwphy, often can detect the presence
not impossible from the images and time         or absence of braze material along the
temperature plot histories.                     bond line but it is often difficult to
                                                distinguish regions in which the braze
    Flash heating produced the clearest         material is present but disbanded. Flash
images of the scheduled discontinuities         heating infrared thermography has been
but missed several of the edge indic.:ttions.   demol1strated to he capable of locating
The primary reason that the flash system        and characterizing brazeline disbands
missed some of the edge discontinuities         between the space shuttle main engine
·was that the discontinuities were on the       nozzle jacket and cooling tubes over most
edge of the field of view (which blocked        of the nozzle acreage.
part of the heat input) and were covered
by tape (which restricted the flow of heat         As shown in Fig. 19, the test process
into the part). The through-transmission        consists of placing the camera and flash
heating did not have these problems             unit in contact with the outer cold wall
because the whole back side of the panel        side of the nozzle and recording the cool
(side opposite the camera) was heated           down of the nozzle after the flash. The
uniformly and the amount of heat was            braze line shows up as dark (cold) Jines in
much greater than with the flash system.        the image and heat is pulled away from
                                                the structural jacket. The interstitial voids
Brazeline Tests                                 between the tubes appear hot (\Vhite) as
                                                does any braze void.
As previously discussed, the space shuttle
main engine nozzles are constructed of             Regions of the nozzle jacket obscured
many cooling tubes brazed to an outer           by plumbing, stiffener dngs and other
structural jacket. Braze line discontinuities   obstructions are not inspectab1e1 for they
may be introduced by manufacturing
processes (that is, omission of braze           fiGURE 19. Detection of braze line disbonds:
material) or service loads (that is, fatigue).  (a) camera unit in contact with outer cold
Missing braze material and fracture             wall of nozzle; (b) interstitial voids between
disbanded braze regions are among the           tubes appear white (hot) as does braze
most critical braze line discontinuities.       void.
    Discontinuities in the braze line           (a)
between the tubes and jacket locally
weaken the nozzle rigidity and increase
susceptibility to buckling. ;\ buckle in the
cooling tubes may cause them to protrude
into the flame flow along the inner nozzle
surface. Exposed to excessive heat, the
liquid hydrogen carrying tubes may be cut
FIGURE 18. Disbands between core and face
sheet of test structure.
                                                (b)
                                                Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 503
cannot he viewed directly by the thermal       Assembly Process For
camera. Other heating techniques, such as      Delamination Simulation
steady lamp heating or hot air guns, ;ue
less capable in this aiJplication because of   A standard technique for creating
the high conductivity of the jacket            delamination discontinuities in laminated
material, thickness of the jacket and the      composite structures is to place a material
large mass of the nozzle that acts as a heat   between the plies to prevent bonding
sink.                                          when the panel is cured. Fluorocarbon
                                               resin tape, backing plastic and bagging
Fabrication of Reference                       film are the most common materials used
Discontinuities for                            when making simulated disbands.
Calibration                                    Typically, the laminate is assembled from
                                               the discontinuity side up so that the
The results of thermographic tests are         inserts would be trapped under as many
often very subjective and strongly affected    plies as possible during cure. In this
by surface conditions, cross sectional         manner the signal component from the
properties and even to some extent the         additional thickness of the inserts would
experience of the test conductor.· As seen     be minimized; that is, the plies above the
in previous discussions of specific            inserts would each compress slightly so as
applications, test panels or standard          to take up the additional thickness of the
discontinuities can be referred to during      inserts. Although this technique is easy to
calibration and testing at the same time as    accomplish, questions arise as the validity
the test objects to ensure that the test will  of the thermal indication - that is,
find all critically sized discontinuities. A   whether the thermal signature resulting
properly designed calibration reference        from an insert indicates the presence of
standard will enable the user to gain          the disband or the thermal difference
                                               created by the insert material itself. An
confidence that once an the scheduled          alternate approach is to create thin voids
                                               in the panel during the curing process.
discontinuities are found in the
calibration component, then any                    One such alternate technique for
potential discontinuity will be found in       creating delamination and disband
the actual structure under examination.        discontinuities is through forming an
This therefore requires that not only docs     indentation in a precured section of the
the calibration article with its built in      panel by means of a thin shim. The
discontinuities be thermally similar to        assembly process for making voids
that which can be expected in the actual       through shimming techniques requires
structure but that also the discontinuities    that several subassemblies be fabricated
behave thermally as real discontinuities       and finally joined to form the resulting
would.                                         panel. To keep residual stresseS to a
                                               tolerable level and to prevent each
   Calibration panels containing               subassembly from warping, care was taken
programmed discontinuities are fabricated      to try to maintain symmetric and
to determine the limits of an infrared         balanced laminates. Also, because the
thermographic nondestructive testing           subassembly with the shimmed
process. Artificial discontinuities            indentation must be compressed by a
resembling delaminations and porosity          small amount such as 75 pm (0.003 in.) at
are fabricated for the purpose of testing      the points where voids are to be created
the ability to locate and size real            sufficient material must be present to
discontinuity by using standard                absorb the shim's thickness. The
thermographic techniques.                      depressions formed by trapping the shim
                                               stock between the prepreg and tooling
Construction Techniques                        plate during the precure process would
                                               then become voids in the finished panel.
The test panels should always be               No peal ply is typically placed under the
fabricated from materials that will yield      faceplate with the shim stock and a
similar thermal properties to those            tooling plate cover to ensure the flatness
featured by the tested article. \'\'henever    of the indented panel. Final assembly of
possible material from the same batch and      the panel consists of placing the
lot should be used to ensure consistent        appropriate uncured ply between each
mechanical and thermal properties. The         subassembly, rebagging and postcuring
panel should also be cured as closely to       the entire laminate.
the test article as possible. Through
thickness and in-plane conductivities,             A very thin shim, less than 75 pm
surface emissivities and textun: all play a    (0.003 in.), minimizes the effect on local
vital role in establishing the limits for a    density. ln fact the amount of disband
given test.                                    can be tailored from nearly touching to
                                               loose disbonds.
                                                   Another technique that has shown
                                               promise in creating tight disbands is to
504 Infrared and Thermal Testing
place a high temperature wax between the             FIGURE 20. Delamination in panel:
       plies durlng assembly. The problem with              (a) thermogram; (b) defect map.
       this method, however, that it is difficult
       to control the shape of the disbond.                 (a)
       Assembly Process for Porosity
       Simulation
       The same general procedure used to make
       panels with inserts can be used to produce
       panels ·with simulated porosity. The only
       difference between the two processes is
       that instead of inserts, a thin layer of
       7.0 pm (0.0003 in.) diameter glass
       microballons are placed between the plies.
       To control the size and thickness of the
       porosity regions the microballons are
       pressed into templates made from 75 pm
       (0.003 in.) stock.
       Test Thresholding                                    (b)     460 mm (18 in.}  =nA:j
                                                                                                                              ~
       As an example of these discontinuity                 tA              A                                       .~
       manufacturing techniques a series of                                                 8 00
       graphite epoxy panels were constructed of                 •    ••
       different thicknesses featuring                                                                   E
       discontinuities of various sizes,                         "         c"                            E
       orientations and depths into the                               ••                           B0
       laminates (Table 4). The thennograms
       produced by flash heating the test panels                        cD0          i l""'
       were analyzed for the ability to detect the
       planned discontinuities. A typical                   legend
       discontinuity map and thermogram from
       a discontinuity standard panel is shown                A= 92 mm {3.62 in.)
       in Fig. 20. Each discontinuity was rated as             B = 77 mm (3.03 in.)
       visible, barely visible or not visible. The            C = 75 mm (2.95 in.)
       rating system was set so that for a
       discontinuity to be visible it must be
       easily detected from a standard laser print
       or single image on the monitor. Barely
       \'isible is defined as a discontinuity that
       requires many sequenced images to be
       able to be seen and may or may not
       produce a good hard copy. Nut \'isible is
TABLE 4. Descriptions of tested panels,
Panel  Dimension                         Thickness   Flaw   Flaw          -·-~--···_ _S!~ze Rang_~
                                                    Shape   Type                     mrn (in.)
Number mmxmm (in. x in.) Plies mm (in.)
           310x310 (12x12) 10 1.6 (0.06)            square  delamination  38.0, 25.0, 19.0, 12.5  (1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5)
2 310x310 (12x12) 10 1.6 (0.06)                     circle  porosity      38.0, 25.0, 19.0, 12.5  (1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5)
 3 460 X 460 (18 X 18) 10 1.6 (0.06)                circle  porosity      12.5, 10.2, 7.6, 5.1    (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2)
4 460 X 460 (18x18) 10 1.6 (0.06)                   square  delamination  12.5, 10.2, 7.6, 5.1    (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2)
5 310x310 (12 X 12) 20 3.2 (0.13)                   square  delamination  38.0, 25.0, 19.0, 12.5  (1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5)
6 310x310 (12x12) 20 3.2 (0.13)                     circle  porosity      38,0, 25.0, 19.0, 12.5  (1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5)
 7 460 X 460 (18 X 18) 20 3.2 (0.13)                circle  porosity      12.5, 10.2, 7.6, 5.1    (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2)
8 460 X 460 (18x18) 20 3.2 (0.13)                   square  delamination  12.5, 10.2, 7.6, 5.1    (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2)
9 310x310 (12x12) 40 6.4 (0.25)                     square  delamination  38.0, 2.5, 19.0, 12.5   (1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5)
10 310 X 310 (12x12) 40 6.4 (0.25)                  circle  porosity      38.0, 2.5, 19.0, 12.5   (1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5)
11 460 X 460 (18x18) 40 6.4 (0.25)                  circle  porosity      12.5, 10.2, 7.6, 5.1    (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2)
12 460 X 460 (18x18) 40 6.4 (0.25)                  square  delamination  12.5, 10.2, 7.6, 5.1    (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2)
                                                            Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 505
defined as a discontinuity that shows no                  The results of this study provide a
           contrast to the background on a                        benchmark for discontinuity size and
           thermogram.                                            depth that can be used for future tests of
                                                                  graphite epoxy structures fabricated using
               A useful image processing procedure is             vacuum bagging operations. The panels
           to subtract the cold image (image before               provide a common set of discontinuities
           flash heating). See discussion of data                 and conditions that permit the
           processing elsewhere in this volume.                   detectability of the thermographic test
                                                                  process to be determined.
              All thermal tests were made with an
           infrared thermal camera with a ±0.025 K                   The tests performed on fabricated
           (±0.025 'C = ±0.045 'F) level thermal                  panels indicate that the ability to locate a
           resolution. The heat source for the                    discontinuity of a particular size is a
           thermal analysis was a high energy flash               function not only of the depth into the
           system capable of yielding a 16 ~                      laminate but also of the entire laminate
           (15.2 BlUrd energy pulse. The camera to                thickness. As expected, the type of
           panel distance was set at 813 mm (32 in.)              discontinuity makes a difference in its
           providing a 775 mm (30.5 in.) square field             ability to be seen as demonstrated by tlle
           of view with the 25 mm lens.                           lower detectability of the porosity over
                                                                  that of the delaminations.
              The delectability chart (Fig. 21)
           demonstrates the limits of the                            The importance of having good
           thermographic process to locate                        discontinuity standards to work from has
           discontinuities in the delamination panels             been illustrated in this work. As
           constructed. From the chart the limits for             demonstrated in the two detectability
           detecting delaminations can be                         charts (Figs. 21 and 22) a good
           established by a boundary defined by a                 discontinuity reference standard panel or
           line over the range of discontinuities                 series of panels can quickly take the
           tested:                                                guesswork out of knowing the limit of the
                                                                  test process. Each ne'i\' structural system
           (1) depth (plies) 0.143 x size (mm)                    featuring a unique fiber, resin, cure or
                                                                  even geometry should have a new set of
                                    + 3.33                        curves developed that determine the
                                                                  limits of the thermographic or other
           Below a discontinuity size of 5.0 mm                   nondestructive tests.
           (0.2 in.) it is expected that the
           discontinuity detection line would move                In-Plane Measurement of Material
           toward a depth of zero. For the porosity               Properties
           class of discontinuities a similar chart was
           made (Fig. 22). Here, the decision line was            A technique has been investigated for
           determined over the range of                           measurement of the through-thickness
           discontinuity sizes tested:                            diffusivity component.s A similar
                                                                  technique offers potential for
           (2) depth (plies) 0.213 x size (mm)                    measurement of the in-plane diffusivity
                                     + 3.33
FIGURE 21. Detectability chart for delaminations.                 FIGURE 22. Detectability chart for porosity.
10                                                                       10
9                                                                         9
8                                                                         8                                                    2:
        7              1--                                                7                                                /
~6                                                                ~6                                               /
b                                                                 b5
                                                                                                                         -- -
a.~ 5                                                             "K 4
             1--;:                                                 ~                          v
~4
03         '                                                      03                               /
                                                                          2
2'                                                                                      p
   '
                                                                      v
0'
                                                                  0
           0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40                            0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
                                                                           (16) (32) (47} (66) (79) (95) (llO) (126) (142) (157)
           (16) (32) (47) (66) (79) (95) (110) (126) (142) (1S7)
                       Flaw 5ize, mm (1 Q-2 in.)                                        Flaw size, mm (1 0-2 in.)
legend                                                            legend
   (> "" visible                                                    (> "' visible
  D "' barely visible                                               0 = barely visible
                                                                    A = not visible
  .4. "" not visible
506 Infrared and Thermal Testing
components.6•7 This technique again uses
a two+sided, or through+transmission,
apparatus arrangement, where the
specimen is continuously heated on one
side (the back surface) and an infrared
camera is used to image tile response of
the opposite side Of the specimen (the
front surface).
   Point heating is provided by an
unexpanded laser beam at normal
incidence to the center of the back
surface. Flash heating with a corner mark~>
or a grid rnark9 could also be used.
                                                           Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 507
PART 3. Pulsed Thermal Inspection of Aging
Aircraft10
Thermal imaging uses pulses of heat to        Depending on the frequency, waves
interrogate subsurface features in solid      penetrate to distances of the order of a
objects. These pulses propagate into the      few millimeters beneath the surface of the
object as· waves of temperature variation     aircraft skin. Discontinuities that occur in
(thermal waves), are reflected from           such depths can be imaged over wide
subsurface discontinuities and return to      areas in short times and the resulting
                                              images have intuitively obvious
the surface as thermal wave echoes. The       interpretations.
echoes can be detected by infrared video      Pulsed Thermal System for
cameras coupled to appropriate electronic     Composite Materials
hardware and software. The pattern of
these echoes on the surface of the object     A representative pulse echo thermal wave
can be used to image subsurface corrosion     imaging system consists of a pulsed heat
and disbands in aircraft skins. (See          source {typically high power photographic
Figs. 23 and 24.) Thermal wave imaging        flash lamps), an infrared video camera
finds application in testing of aging         and image processing hardware and
aircraft.                                     software, all of which are controlled by a
                                              personal computer.
   Thermal ·wave imaging was pioneered
in the 1960s.l 1•12 The imaging process was       In the following example, the area of
theoretically described in terms of thermal   the aircraft to be examined is a lap splice
waves in 1980 and excellent agreement         region. Because the bare aluminum skin
was obtained between theory and               of the aircraft is an extremely good
experimental results.B Thermal waves are      reflector of visible light and also a poor
heavily damped propagating variations in      emitter of infrared radiation, the lap splio.'
temperature, analogous in many ways to        region is covered with a water soluble
other electromagnetic radiations              paint.
propagating in a very good conductor. As
such, they have a relatively shallm\' skin        \'\1hen the energy from the thermal
depth; nevertheless, it is clear that         system is absorbed at the surface of the
thermal waves undergo all the usual wave      aircraft, a thermal wave pulse is launched
phenomena, such as diffraction,               into its skin. \'\1hen this pulse is reflected
interference and others, and can be used      from a locally corroded or disbanded
for imaging. The technology possesses a
number of advantages for aircraft
nondestructive testing applications.
FIGURE 23. Thermogram of section of           FIGURE 24. Thermogram of experimental
validation library test sample taken from     boron patch on aircraft, showing both
near crown of aircraft fuselage. Image shows  intentional and nonintentional defects.
firmly bonded tear straps on rear side of
sample.
508 Infrared and Thermal Testing
subsurface region, the reflected portion       course of this development had been
propagates back to the surface, where it       developed for surveillance applications
modifies the time dependence of the            and hence were designed to be used at
surface temperature. This occurs with a        relatively long distances from the tmget.
delay determined by the thermal wave           In a hangar the inspector must operate at
transit time for the pulse to propagate        short distances between the camera and
down to the boundary and back to the           the airplane of 0.5 m (20 in.} or less,
surface. The return of the thermal wave        compatible with operation from typical
signal is monitored by means of the            scaffolding, under the belly of the plane
infrared video camera, which follows the       or even in cramped interior spaces.
time dependent surface distribution of the
infrared emb.S:ion from the surface. The          The desktop computer and 355 mm
signal from the camera is fed to a real        (14 in.) monitor used in the original
time processing board in a computer. This      system had to be carried on a separate cart
board carries out fast pipeline processing     connected to the power supply cart, flash
of the signal under the control of             lamps and camera by a number of cables.
dedicated software.                            This second cart had to be moved around
                                               the aircraft in unison with the movement
Case History of System                         of the power supply cart, making the
Development                                    nmvement of the total system a
                                               multiperson operation.
In the 1990s, a series of tests provided
valuable information about human factors          The problems described above were
in inspecting aircraft in a hangar             encountered in the development period of
environment. It became evident that the        the system, with iterative testing of the
original system, which was functionally        modifications. Below are described several
acceptable for thermal wave imaging in         of the modifications.
the laboratory, had a number of practical
drawbacks. A discussion of the drawbacks          The second version of the system used
may be useful to persons designing             a separate cart to carry the power supplies,
custom test installations or assembling        to make a major reduction in the weight
systems from preexisting components.           and a major improvement in ease of
                                               manipulation of the cart that carries the
   The cart with the six power supplies        camera and flash lamps. In this form, it
mounted on it was too heavy for manual         was possible for two people to lift the
lifting onto the stair lifts, scaffolding and  flash lamp cart up onto the lowered stair
elsewhere and, because of its weight, was      lift. It was necessary to add 8 m (26 ft)
clumsy .to manipulate around the aircraft.     extensions to the flash lamp cables,
                                               thereby partially offsetting the reduction
   The lamps used in this original system,     to the overall weight achieved by
purchased off the shelf from a                 reducing the number of power supplies
photographic supply vendor, also had           and the removal of the power supplies
deficiencies. The primary problem was          from the cart carrying the camera.
that they consisted of U shaped flash          Another improvement in this second
tubes with circular reflectors whereas the     version of the cart was the addition of an
area being imaged ·was rectangular. It         electromech<mical actuator for raising and
proved to be nearly impossible for the         lowering the shroud containing the flash
operator to aim these lamps in such a way      lamps and camera, so that more precise
that the area to be imaged ·was both           and convenient positioning could be
uniformly and intensely illuminated            achieved. Using a cmnbination of this cart
(although post processing can overcome         and the stair lift available at the center, it
this problem). The problem became more         was possible to reach all of the aircraft
severe when an attempt to reduce the           fuselage, from directly under the belly to
weight of the system by using a new and        about 1 m (40 in.) above the windows
more sensitive infrared camera included a      (with the exception of the area directly
reduction in the number of lamps and           over the wings). It was also possible to
power supplies from six to four. The total     image the underside of the wings with
intensity with four lamps was more than        this cart. This still left inaccessible the
adequate but experiments at the                crown of the fuselage, the area of the
validation center have proven that the         fuselage directly above the wings and
circular lamps were not able to provide a      most of the top surface of the wings.
satisfactor}' final solution to the heating
problem. Also, each of these commercially          Input from aircraft manufacturers and
available lamps carried two, very heavy,       airlines led to development of a system
multiconductor cables, which increased         that was light and portable for
the weight of the system still further and     manipulation by one person. This version
made the manipulation of the camera and        combines the major elements of the
flash lamps very awkward.                      previous version (camera, flash lamps and
                                               power supplies, shroud, computer) all on
   Lenses commonly available for the           a single, two-wheeled cart that an
various infrared cameras used during the       inspector can wheel about with one hand
                                               and that can easily be tm·en up and down
                                               Aerospace Applications of lnfrare i and Thermal Testing 509
scaffolding stairs by one person. This
                   radical decrease in weight and increase in
                   portability was achieved by reducing the
                   size of the shroud and flash lamp system,
                   thus reducing to two the power supplies
                   needed, by moving from a desktOp
                   computer and monitor to a laptop
                   computer with a miniature card cage, by a
                   camera weighing about 1.5 kg (3 lb) and
                   by integrating all of these into a single
                   unit, mounted on a two-wheeled cart with
                   large pneumatic tires.
                       Unlike the previous tvm versions, in
                   which the shroud, flash l'dmps and camera
                   system were manipulated on an arm
                   attached to the cart, in this portable
                   system the shroud is designed for hand
                    held use. It can be separated from the cart
                   and carried onto the crown of the plane,
                   the top of the \Ving, inside baggage
                   compartments and elsewhere. This
                   version can !Je used on any support
                   structure that can be accessed by one
                   person, from elaborate maintenance
                   hangar scaffolding to something as simple
                   as a step ladder. Additionally, it would
                   require only simple modification to be
                   mounted as a sensor on a robotically
                   manipulated scanner, as developed for
                   other test techniques.
                       To overcome the problems of
                   nonuniform heating, the commercial
                   flash lamps and circular reflectors were
                    replaced with linear flash lamps and
                    reflectors tailored specifically for the
                    redesigned shrouds. Linear flash lamps
                    and reflectors have been fabricated for
                    several different sizes of shroud. In
                   connection with the change from tile
                    commercial flash lamps to the custom
                   design, the cabling has also been
                   modified. Each lamp has only one cable
                   and that cable is roughly one third the
                   weight of one of the original cables, two
                   of which were used with each of the
                   original lamps.
                       Figures 23 and 24 show thermograms
                    produced by the system. \•Vide angle
                   lenses can be used at short working
                   distances.
             Closing
                    Developed in the 1990s, the pulsed
                    thermal wave technique finds application
                    in aircraft maintenance hangars. The case
                    history above is ·well documented.'4-20
                    Many other examples are discussed in the
                    literature21-26 and in conferences devoted
                    to this topic.
510 Infrared and Thermal Testing
PART 4. Thermographic Detection of Impact
Damage in Graphite Epoxy Composites26
Pulsed thermal imaging has been              and the aerospace industry accounts for
investigated for the detection of impact     more than half of that marketP
damage in graphite epoxy materiaL The
Investigation was part of a program to          Production testing of composite
determine the feasibility of infrared        structures has been addressed by a
thermographic techniques as a field test     number of companies and an assortment
system for composite structures.             of nondestructive testing tools are
                                             available for the production quality
   Graphite epoxy composite samples          assurance of these materials and
were prepared and subjected to a wide        structmes. These systems include
range of impact damage, resulting in         automated ultrasonic scanning systems
damage levels that varied from barely        and automated radiographic and
visible damage to severe delamination.       radioscopic test systemsP' Several
Comparative tests of the damaged samples     nondestructive test systems have also
were obtained by ultrasonic and eddy         been proposed for use in the evaluation of
current testing. The test results showed     inservice composite structures.29,30
that all three techniques were capable of    However, these systems have often been
detecting the onset of damage in the         either too slow, difficult to use in a field
graphite epoxy at a point where visible      environment or not completely effective
damage to either surface was barely          for the testing of inservice composites.
detectable.
                                                Impact damage represents one of the
   for the samples, 4.8 to 6.4 mm (0.19 to   common in service problems with
0.25 in.) thick impact levels on the order   composite structures. In this program,
of 13 j (9.5 ft·lb1) produced this barely    infrared techniques have been
detectable damage in edge clamped            investigated as a field testing technique
samples. This level of barely detectable     for the detection and evaluation of this
damage has been independently reported       type of inservice degradation of
by others for ultrasonic testing. The        composites. The work emphasized
thermal flow analysis presented shows        graphite epoxy composite materiaL
that infrared testing has limitations in
terms of detecting deep lying damage.           The basis for infrared testing relies on
                                             the fact that an application (or removal)
   Nevertheless, thermographic testing       of heat on the surface of a test material
offers excellent potential for field         will result in surface temperature changes.
inspection of composite structures.          The material surface temperature will
Degradation of composites in service will    show variations as the heat diffuses and
include near surface damage, which can       encounters material heterogeneities such
readily be detected by infrared imaging.     as delaminations, cracks and foreign
The infrared and thermal test method         material. The difference !lT in surface
offers many advantages for field             temperature at a discontinuity is a
inspection app1ications in addition to the   dynamic process. Immediately after
excellent demonstrated sensitivity; these    heating, there is no D.T (assuming uniform
include ready portability for noncontact,    heating). ·within a short time, D.T will
one·sided, large area testing.               show a maximum value and then decrease
                                             as the heat diffuses around and through
Introduction                                 the discontinuity. The times for peak
                                             response and the surface temperature
Advanced fiber reinforced composites         equalization vary depending on the heat
offer many advantages in high                excitation and the thermal properties of
performance applications. The high           lJoth the test materia) and the
strength and stiffness of the fibers, light  discontinuity.
weight, designable properties and net
shape manufacturing features of these           Infrared and thermal testing can he
materials make them very attractive. As a    done in several ways. The most useful
result of these advantages, composites are   approach is a one-sided test in which the
being used for more and more                 surface of the object is subjected to a
applications, particularly in the defense    temperature change and the inspection is
and aerospace markets. Advanced              done hy observing temperature variations
composites represent a large world market    on the same surface of the object. Assume
                                             that the test surface is heated
                                             momentarily by a heat gun or radiant
                                             Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 511
heat source, for example. In a sound                             multilevel impact damage readily detected
material, the heat will diffuse uniformly.                       hy infrared testing. These samples show a
However, if there is a thermal barrier (for                      mild surface indentation, some front
example1 caused by a delamination, crack                         surface cracking and back surface
or foreign material), the area over such a                       blistering. Several new samples were
discontinuity will retain its surface heat                       acquired for this program. The'new
longer than the surrounding uniform                              samples were 100 x 150 mm (4 x 6 in.) in
region. A typical infrared test system is                        area and 4.8 mm (0.19 in.) thick with a
shown in diagram form in Fig. 25. A                              quasi isotropic layup. These samples were
radiant heater is shown as the thermal                           impacted hy using a fixture in V\'hich the
excitation source; other types, such as hot                      sample was clamped around all the edges
air guns and contact heaters, can be used.                       over a 75 x 125 mm (3.0 x 5.0 in.)
                                                                 window. The impactor was a 5 kg (1.1 lb1)
   Another approach for infrared testing                         mass with a 16 mm (0.625 in.) diameter
involves heat excitation on one side and                         impact tup.
infrared imaging on the opposite side-
basically a through~transmission test. In                           The impact damaged samples covered a
this case, a thermal barrier in the test
material would appear cooler than the                            range from 3.4 to 13.6 J (2.5 to 10 ft.Jb,).
surrounding region on the test side. This
technique for infrared testing offers some                       The samples impacted at energies of 3.4
improved response to deep lying
discontinuities in thick material. The                           and 6.8 J (2.5 and 5 ft·lbr) showed no
detection of deep lying discontinuities
can be a problem because of lateral                              surface damage from the impact. Samples
thermal diffusion. A general rule of
thumb for this type of test is that                              impacted at energies of 10.2 and 13.6 J
detection of deep discontinuities is
limited to a minimum size comparable to                          (7.5 and 10 ft·lb1) showed only mild
the depth in the material.                                       surface indentations.
    Infrared thermography can be used to                            In addition, several other impact
image surface temperature patterns at full                       damaged graphite epoxy samples were
video frame rates. Through study of a                            available. These samples were impacted by
thermal perturbation on the surface of the                       dropping a 39.4 kg (86.9 lb) mass through
sample, these surface temperature patterns                       a smaller distance to produce similar
can be understood to represent the                               nominal values of impact energy. These
internal structure and discontinuities                           samples were edge supported hut not edge
within the component. The physical hasis                         clamped. Although the impact damage
for this test technique is well                                  levels for these samples did not correlate
understood31-36 and the technique has                            with those that were edge clamped, the
been used for a wide range of test                               samples provided some useful
applicationsY-B                                                  comparisons and helped fill in the gaps in
                                                                 the impact energy values of the samples.
Test Samples
                                                                 Test Results
The test samples were graphite epoxy
composite laminates. Two 150 by 150 mm                           A variety of infrared testing systems and
(6.0 by 6.0 in.) by 6.4 mm (0.25 in.) thick                      heat application systems were evaluated
impact damaged samples were available                            on the test samples. !vfost of the testing
from prior work. These samples had been                          was accomplished with the same infrared
                                                                 camera. This camera uses a dual-element
impacted at energies of 27 and 30.5 J                            mercury cadmium tellurium detector with
                                                                 a 2 mrad instantaneous field of view
(20 and 22.5 ft-Jb1) and contained                               sensitive in the 8 to 12 pm .wavelength
                                                                 band. lt produces 445 lines of infrared
FIGURE 25. Block diagram of typical thermographic testing        data. Several other infrared imaging
system.                                                          systems were used to examine a smaller
                                                                 group of the impacted samples.
Video cassette recorder  Infrared          /
                         camera                                     The other thermographic camera uses a
 I I IFrame grabber                ---------- Radiant            single-element mercury cadmium
                                                                 tellurium detector sensitive in the 8 to
                                              heal Test          12 pm band. It uses a mirror scanning
                                                                 system similar to 445 line model produce
                                   ............... source panel  200 distinct lines of infrared data with
                                                                 250 resolvable elements per line. lt
                                           ',                    produces seven-hit intensity resolution. A
                                                                 chopped pyroelectric vidicon produces a
Computer image           Df---      Image                        rectangular image field and 300 lines of
processing system                  monitor                       infrared image. \1\/ith germanium optics,
                                                                 the vidicon is sensitive in the 8 to 14 Jlill
                                                                 \\'avelength range. A different thermal
                                                                 imager u.ses a 512 x 512 element platinum
                                                                 silicide infrared charge sweep device
                                                                 sensitive in the 3 to S pm wavelength
512 Infrared and Thermal Testing
band. The camera produces a very high          nearly all of the images presented.
spatial resolution image with an eight·bit     Contrast manipulations were generally
intensity resolution. The system was           effective at boosting the detail in the
evaluated with the standard 50 mm lens         smaller discontinuities. The amount of
                                               contrast enhancement needed varied with
with a focal number of 2. Acomparison          the imaging system used and with the
                                               intensity of the heat source. In many
of these infrared imagers is given in          cases where the more sensitive infrared
Table 5.                                       cameras were used with a relatively high
                                               intensity heat source, no contrast
   Several heat sources were also              enhancement was required. 1\•fatrix filters,
evaluated. These included a heat gun with      including a variety of edge enhancement
a fishtail nozzle, a 1000 VV quartz halogen    and high and low pass filters, provided
lamp in a reflector, an array of four 600 \•V  very limited benefit for these images. Line
quartz halogen lamps in reflectors, a set of   scans were shown to be useful for
three 910 mm (36 in.) long quartz              evaluating the relative intensity of various
halogen lamps in a custom elliptical           areas of the image using a graphical
reflector and a single·lamp 4800 \fl.'·s       display but this feature generally did not
xenon strobe. All of these systems             improve the detectability of image details.
produced good results with the impact          Image subtraction was evaluated as both a
damaged samples hut the quartz halogen         real time and a postprocessing tool and
lamps generally produced the most              showed a limited benefit with these
uniform results and provided the most          images.
attractive portable design opportunities.
                                                  A real time processing system44 was
   The 13.6J (10.0 ft·lbr) impact sample       evaluated using a video tape of the
showed a level of damage that could just       infrared tests on the impact damaged
be detected by the infrared testing. The       samples. The processing system provides a
damage is somewhat smaller than but            number of features, the most important of
                                               which is a locally adaptive contrast
similar in form to that in the 3.4 J           enhancement. This process provides a real
                                               time compensation for regions tha~ vary
(2.5 ft·lbr) sample impacted with the          in background intensity, providing in
                                               effect a simultaneous field flattening and
larger mass and without edge clamping.         contrast enhancement. This appwach is
Hguie 26 shows this damage indication          very effective where uniform heating is
for the edge damped sample. In Figs. 26c       not achieved or ·where differing ambient
and 26d the contrast has been enhanced         temperatures (sunlight and shadow) or
to about 180 percent of normal. The small      surface emissivity (paint color change)
delaminations are slightly more visible in     produce nonuniform thermal
the enhanced image. Figure 27 shows            backgrounds. The system effectively
infrared results for several other samples     removes these background variances while
that were impact damaged without edge          enhancing local detail.
clamping. The similarity in the damage
indication in Figs. 26a and 26b to that in        The resolution and contrast of infrared
Figs. 27a and 27b is apparent.                 images correlates with the number of scan
                                               lines and dynamic range.
   A wide variety of image processing
tools were evaluated for use with the             Marginal indications of impact damage
infrared images on this program. These         are shown in Figs. 26. A pyroelectric
tools have included frame averaging,           camera has a resolution comparable to
contrast manipulations, various matrix         that of an infrared scanner but produces
filters, line scans, image subtraction and     images with lower contrast. With a
time sensitive processing. Many of these       moderate amount of contrast
tools were evnluated in both real time and     enhancement, the im;:~ges were roughly
postprocessing modes. In general terms,
frame averaging was almost universally
effective at reducing the noise of the
detector signal. Frame averaging on the
order of four to eight frames was used for
TABLE 5. Comparison of infrared camera performance parameters.
                 Field  Instantaneous  Sensitivity                            Infrared   Pixels Resolvable Dynamic
               of View  Field of View    Range                                Lines per
Imager. (degree)                                                                         per Elements Range
                            (mrad)         (~m)                                Frame
                                                                    Detector             line per line       (bits)
           21 X 28      2.0            8 lo 12                      HgCdTeJ   445                       400  7
2 15 X 20               2.0            8 to 12                      HgCdTe 3  200        256 175             8
3 11 X 14               0.5            3 to 5                       CSD0      512        512
4 50 mm lens                           8 to 14                                250        256
                                                                    crvc
'· Sing!e-dement mercury cadmium tellurium detector.
b. 512 >< 512 platinum silicon infrared charge 5weep device array.
c. Chopped pyroelectric vidicon.
                                               Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 513
comparable. The camera showed excellent        superposition of the infrared results for
spatial resolution and thermal sensitivity     the front and back surface examinations.
roughly comparablE' to those of the
infrared scanner.                                 Three of the impact damaged samples
                                               were inspected with an imaging eddy
   The impact damaged samples were             current test system. Eddy current testing
subjected to a variety of other                has been shown to be very effective in
nondestructive tests, including ultrasonic     mapping the damage associated with
and eddy current tests. A focused 10 MHz       impact in the relatively conductive
transducer was used to perform the             graphite epoxy composites.45Ar. The eddy
reflector plate examinations. The              current scans tend to map damage
ultrasonic results correlate quite ·well with  associated with the conductive fibers.
the infrared test results. The ultrasonic      However, it follows that the impact
results for the minimal impact sample          damage that produces the infrared and
(Figs. 27) correspond with the nearly          ultrasonic results would have some effect
circular perimeter of damage seen in the       on the eddy current impedance because of
infrared image. The reflector plate            the separation of the layers of fibers at a
examination does not retain any depth          delamination (a liftoff effect) and because
information. Thus, the ultrasonic results      of some broken fibers at the impact site.
shO\\' the extent of internal damage           Frequency scans were run for the eddy
projected onto the surface of the sample       current coil in air and in contact with the
and are roughly equal to the                   laminate. The frequency was swept
FIGURE 26. Infrared results for sample impacted with edge clamping at level of 1 3.6 J
(1 0.0 ft·lb,): (a) front surface unenhanced; (b) back surface unenhanced; (c) front surface
contrast enhanced; (d) back surface contrast enhanced.
(a) (c)
(b) (d)
514 Infrared and Thermal Testing
through the range of 500kHz to 5 MHz   frequency for separation of the composite
and the reactance and resistance were  signals from those of air. This frequency
recorded throughout the sweeps. The    ·was then selected to produce the eddy
results of the two sweeps were then
subtracted to determine the optimal    current scans. The eddy current scan of
                                       the front side of the minimal impact
FiGURE 27. Infrared results for samples impacted without edge clamping: (a) front surface at
3.4 I (2.5 ft·lb,); (b) back surface at 3.4 I (2.5 ft·lb,); (c) front surface at 4.1 I (3.0 ft-lb,);
(d) back surface at 4.1 I (3.0 ft·lb,); (e) front surface at 5.4 I (4.0 ft.Jb,); (f) back surface at
5.4 I (4.0 ft·lb,).
w 00
(b)
                                       Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 515
sample showed an image with a damage          Because quasiisotropic layup is assunwd,
region comparable to that of the infrared     the explicit ply layup configuration does
                                              not need to be known. The material
re~ults.                                      properties within the plane of a lamina
                                              are assumed to be the average of the
Discussion                                    properties along the fibers and the
                                              properties transverse to the fibers. The
The infrared signal provides a reasonable     thickness direction properties are assumed
estimate of discontinuity size and, in        to be those predicted for the direction
some cases, discontinuity depth (subject      transverse to the fibers.
to limitations discussed in the theoretical
analyses to follow). Conclusions can also        The material properties given in
be drawn about discontinuity type, at         Table 6 were assumed for the constituent
least in terms of the discontinuity's         and composite materials, assuming
relative thermal properties compared to       graphite fibers in an epoxy matrix.
those of the composite material itself. For   Calculations were performed for a fiber
example, in a one*sided test a wet pocket     volume fraction of 65 percent, resulting in
would act as a heat sink, giving a cool       the lamina properties shown in Table 6
area on the test surface. A delamination,     and used in the heat flow model. The two
on the other hand, would act as a thermal     values listed for conductivity of the fiber~
harrier, resulting in a warmer surface area.  are for the longitudinal and transverse
There will often be other clues available     conductivity, which for graphite fibers
(for example, recent service history) that    differ by an order of magnitude. The
may help determine the cause of a             micromechanics equations are for
thermographic test indication. Additional     determining lamina thermal properties:J?
insight can be gained from a thermal flow
analysis.                                         Heat flow analyses were performed for
                                              a solid graphite epoxy laminate S mm
   A computer simulation has been             (0.2 in.) thick. Models were run in ·which
developed to model some of the effects of     the discontinuities ·were placed at depths
a thermal pulse traveling through a solid     for each 10 percent of the laminate
graphite epoxy laminate. The computer         thickness. A large discontinuity, 36 by
simulation assumes the uniform                36 mm (1.4 x 1.4 in.) in area and located
deposition of a thermal load on one           0.5 mm (0.02 in.) deep, 10 percent below
surface at time zero. The laminate is         the surface, produces significant contrast.
assumed to have a discontinuity in its        The peak contrast can he seen to diminish
central region (away from any edges). The     quickly with discontinuities deeper in the
size and depth of the discontinuity can       laminate. Discontinuities deeper than
vary. The program then monitors the           about halfway through the laminate
thermal contrast on the front and back        produce insignificant contrast and
surfaces between the temperature at the       generally are only marginally detectable
discontinuity and the surface temperature     in a one-sided test.
away from the discontinuity. Timing,
sensitivity, size*to-depth relationships and     Similar calculations ·were obtained for
material property effects can be seen from    smaller discontinuities of 12 by 12 mm
this model.                                   (0.5 x 0.5 in.). Three differences between
                                              these figures are evident.
   The model uses an explicit finite
difference solution of the heat conduction
equation given as the partial differential.
TABLE 6. Assumed properties of carbon epoxy specimens.
Property                          Sl Unit                 Value Used
                                                                         English Unit
Fiber density                        1.80 g·cm-3          0.065 lbm·in.-3
Matrix density                       1.25 g·cm-3
Fiber heat capacity               837.0 J·kg-1.K-1        0.045 lbm·in.-3
Matrix heat capacity                 1.05 kJ·kg-l.K- 1    0.20 ca11cg-1.K-1
Fiber conductivity                 83.68/8.368 W·m 1.K 1  0.25 calrc9-1·K·l
Matrix conductivity                  0.1803 W·m·l.K 1     0.200/0.020 ca11cs··l.cm-l.K-1
lamina density                       1.61 g·cm-~          4.31 x 10-4 calws-l·cm-l.K-1
lamina heat capacity
longitudinal conductivity         895.376 J·kg-'·K-1      0.058 lb01·in.-3
Transverse conductivity            54.3920 W·m-1-K-1      0.214 calrcg-l.K-1
In-plane conductivity                0.7238 W·m-1-K-1     0.130 ca11cs··l.crn·l.K-1
                                   27.5307 W·m-l.K-1      1.73 x 1Q-3 Gllrcs-1·crn-1-K-1
                                                          0.0658 ca11cs-l·cm-l.K-1
516 Infrared and Thermal Testing
1. The contrast generated for all of the       Analysis indie<1tes that it takes about
    discontinuity depth curves is lower for   2.3 s for the thermal pulse to diffuse
     smaller discontinuities than for larger  through the thickness of the laminate and
    discontinuities.                          generate a barely perceptible temperature
 2. The rate of contrast decay_as the         difference of ±0.05 K (0.05 'C "' 0.09 '!').
    discontinuities move deeper through       This is seen as a flat section at the
    the thickness is higher for the smaller   beginning of the curves. The increase in
     discontinuities.                         thermal contrast (the curve goes negative
                                              because the temperature over the
  3. The widths of the contrast peaks are     discontinuity is cooler than the
     narrower for the smaller                 temperature in other areas) increases in a
    discontinuities. The narrow peaks         very similar fashion for all of the
    indicate that the thermal indications     discontinuity depths in this case.
    will not persist as long in the thermal   However, the contrast for the far side
     images.                                  discontinuity decays more rapidly as the
                                              lateral thermal flow within the thickness
All of these effects can be explained by      of the laminate begins to eliminate the
the in~plane conduction of heat.              in-plane temperature differences. For the
                                              near surface discontinuity, the thermal
   The graphite fibers conduct heat much      shadow caused hy the discontinuity exists
more rapidly than the matrix material         in only the closest 10 percent of the
and as a result, the in~plane conductivity    laminate thickness (compared to 90
is high relative to the thickness direction   percent for the far side discontinuity). The
conductivity. As a thermal indication         lateral thermal flow therefore has less
develops because of the blockage of           chance to remove this temperature
thermal flow through the thickness, the       difference and the image of the
in~plane temperature difference generates
an in~plane thermal flow. For the larger      discontinuity wm stay sharper and persist
discontinuities, this initially results in
only a blurring of the edges of the           longer than for the far side discontinuity.
indication. For the smaller discontinuities,     The cmves for smaller discontinuities
the edge blurring quickly converges to
produce a reduction in the maximum            are very similar. The principal differences
contrast produced. In fact, the model         are exactly analogous to those seen for
indicates that compared to the larger         the one-sided test. Note that the
discontinuities, the in~plane conductivity    maximum contrast generated for the
quenches the development of the thermal       smaller discontinuity on the near side is
contrast and not only reduces the peak        only about 0.17 compared to almost 0.9
contrast but shifts the peak to an earlier    for the larger discontinuity. Also, note
time because the in-plane heat flow           that the peak occurs at about 5 s for the
quenches the contrast before the              near side small discontinuity, compared to
anticipated peak is reached. (The             about 8 s for the larger near side
temperature for the discontinuity             discontinuity. It should be pointed out
represents an average value computed for      that the absolute magnitudes of the
the central 25 percent of the discontinuity   thermal contrasts are relatively
area.) The fact that the material is          meaningless because they depend on the
anisotropic simply shifts this                intensity of an arbitrary thermal pulse;
phenomenon to larger discontinuities by       however, because the same thermal pulse
a factor "(kin-plane·ko~lt-of-pl.me).
                                              fiGURE 28. Thermal contrast computations for
   These analyses correlate well with the     through~transmission test in graphite epoxy.
experimental results. Infrared indirations
of small heterogeneities tend to be of less      0.9
contrast than those of larger
discontinuities, as shown in Figs. 26 and            0.8
27. In addition, the peak contrast for
small discontinuities occurs earlier in       ·0co 0.7
time.
                                              -"'- 0.6
   In addition to these one~sided thermal     "'b 0.5
flow analyses, through transmission
thermal models were run for                   c 0.4
discontinuities 10 percent of the depth       u0 0.3
from the far side, at the midplane and        ~
about 10 percent of the laminate              mw 0.2
thickness below the imaged surface. (The                  ~~
terms uear and far are in reference to the    ~
infrared camera, not the heat source.)                         ~ Srnallllow
Again, large discontinuities of :i6 by               0.1
36 mm (1.4 x 1.4 in.) and small                  0 L_~~--L_~-~
discontinuities of 12 by 12 mm (0.5 x
0.5 in.) were considered in the models.                   0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
                                                          (2) (4) (6) (8) (10) (12) (14) (16) (18)
                                                          Discontinuity depth, mm (1 0-2 in.)
                                              Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 517
was used for all of the analyses,            (visually or by ultrasonics) at an impact
              comparisons are valid.
                                                           level of 9 J (6.6 ft·lb1). The Canadian test
                 The thermal contrast as a function of
              discontinuity depth belmv the monitored      results showed the heginning of ultrasonic
              surface is summarized in Fig. 28 for the     detection of damage at impact levels in
              through-transmission case and in Fig. 29
              for the one-sided examination case. Note     the range of 12 to 14 J (8.9 to 10.3 ft·lb1).
              that J:ig. 28 implies that large
              discontinuities may be easily seen at any    The results presented here showed initial
              depth for the through-transmission           detection of the sample impacted at an
              examinationi however, smaller
              discontinuities near the far side may not    energy of 13.6 J (10 ft·lb,), as shown in
              generate sufficient contrast. to be seen in
              all cases. Not surprisingly, the decay in    Fig. 26. Therefore, these independent
              thermal contrast with depth is much          results tend to confirm the results, which
              more dramatic for the one-sided tests, as    indicate that the threshold of detecfion of
              shown in Fig. 29. Note that for the small    composite impact damage \'\'as similar for
              discontinuities, the contrast is             both infrared and ultrasonic testing, given
              approaching zero even before the mid         damage induced at these energy levels.
              plane of the laminate is reached.
                                                           Conclusions
                 Overall, the one-sided test shows much
              more sensitivity to discontinuity depth      The infrared tests of the impact damaged
              indication than the through-transmission     samples reveal delamination damage
              tests. The effect of discontinuity size on   varying with impact energy. The results of
              the time to peak can also be seen to be a    the infrared tests are quite consistent
              nontrivial effect.                           among the various infrared imaging
                                                           systems used and correlate well \Vith the
                 These analyses correlate 'Nell with the   results of other nondestructive testing
              infrared results presented here and those    methods, including ultrasonic and eddy
              presented in more detail in the final        current testing. The results clearly show
              report~8 The correlations include the        that infrared testing can reveal barely
              relative sizes, contrasts and timing of the  visible impact damage to a degree
              infrared indications. Other studies have     comparable to that achieved by other
              refined the technique.49                     nondestructive testing methods.
                 In terms of comparative sensitivity for      Based on these results, it appears that
              the detection of composite impact            infrared imaging is a practical method for
              damage, recently published work on the       field testing of composite structures. The
              detection and characterization of            sensitivity to a major field degradation
              composite impact damage tends to             mechanism, impact damage to graphite
              confirm the results obtained in this         epoxy, has been shown to be comparable
              programf'0 The Canadian composite            to that of ultrasonic and eddy current
              samples were edge clamped during             methods. Infrared and thermal testing
              impact, so their reported values should be   offers the additional advantages in terms
              comparable to the results obtained with      of noncontact, one-sided, large area
              the samples described above. In the tests    testing with reasonably straightforward
              reported here, no damage was detected in     interpretation capability and ready
              a sample impacted at 10.2J (7.5 ft.Jb,).     availability of lest result recording.
              This compares weB to the Canadian 'ivork,
              which indicated no detectable damage            It is interesting that ultrasonic testing
                                                           can detect delaminations induced by
                                                           impacts of far lower energy, at least 2.0 J
                                                           (1.4 ft·lb,).
FIGURE 29. Thermal contrast numerical simulation for
one-sided tests in graphite epoxy.
%! 16
c
       14
~
.t "'~ 12           large flow
       10
-f'           0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
              (2) (4) (6) (8) (10) (12) (14) (16) (18)
"b""'  8
       6
c      4
0
v
~2
ro
 ~
~      0
           0
              Discontinuity depth, mm (1 Q-2 in.)
518 Infrared and Thermal Testing
PART 5. Infrared Scanning Radiometry of
Convective Heat Transfer
The following discussion of radiometry of     convective heat fluxes in both steady and
convective heat transfer has implications     transient techniques56-.'iH \'\'ithin this
for developmental research in wind            context, an infrared scanning radiometer
tunnel technology.                            can he considered <IS a thin film sensor54
                                              hecause it generally measures skin
   Nondestructive testing ·with infrared      temperatures. In other contexts, infrared
thermography is mostly achieved by            detectors are thiu film detectors insofar as
heating or cooling the body to be tested      they are fabricated using vapor
and by following its surface temperature      deposition. The thermal map obtained by
evolution as a function of time. ,,Vhilc      means of currently available computerized
processing the temperature history, it is     thermographic systems is formed through
very important to have a precise              a large amount of pixels (20 000 to more
knowledge of the net heat flux at the         than 60 000 kilobytes) so that infrared
wall, that Is, the imposed heat flux minus    scanning radiometry can be practically
the total losses. In most applications of     regarded as providing a two-dimensional
infrared thermography, the thermal losses     array of thin films. Howe\'er, unlike
are essentially due to radiation and          standard thin films, which have a
convection. The evaluation of the             response time of the order of
radiative heat flux is straightforward if     microsecond, the typical response time of
emissivity is known but the convective        infrared scanning radiometry is of the
heat flux is generally more difficult to      order of 0.1 to 0.01 s.
measure.
                                                 Infrared scanning radiometry as a
    It has to be also pointed out that        temperature transducer in convective heat
sometimes nondestructive testing can be       transfer measurement appears, from
performed by either heating or cooling        several points of view, advantageous if
the tested body with a gas stream. For a      compared to standard transducers. In fact,
quantitative evaluation of the results, also  as already mentioned, infrared scanning
in this case a detailed knowledge of the      radiometry is fully two-dimensional. It
heat transfer distribution over the tested    permits the evaluation of errors due to
body is compulsory. This section reviews      tangential conduction ·and radiation and
some techniques useful to measure             is nonintrusive. For example1 the last
convective heat fluxes with the aid of        characteristic makes it possible to get rid
infrared thermography.                        of the conduction errors through the
                                              thermocouple's or resistance temperature
   Usually, measuring convective heat         detector's wires.
fluxes requires both a sensor (with its
corresponding thermal model) and some         Heat Flux Sensors
temperature measurements. In ordinary
techniques,51•55 where temperature is         Heat·flux sensors generally consist of
measured by thermocouples, thermistors,       plane slabs with a known thermal
resistance temperature detectors or           behavior, whose temperature is to be
pyrometers, each transducer yields the        measured at fixed points.51 -55 The
heat flux at a single point or at a space     equation for heat conduction in solids
averaged point. Hence, in terms of spatial    applied to the proper sensor model yields
resolution, the sensor itself can be          the relationship by ·which measured
considered as zero dimensional. This          temperature is correlated to the heat
constraint makes experimental                 transfer rate.
measurements particularly troublesome
whenever temperature, or heat flux fields         The most commonly used heat flux
exhibit high spatial gradients.               sensors are the so·called one-dimensional
                                              ones, where the heat flux to be measured
    Infrared scanning radiometry              is assumed to be normal to the sensing
constitutes a true two-dimensional            element surface. That is, the temperature
temperature transducer because it allows      gradient components parallel to the slab
the performance of accurate measurement       plane are neglected. In practice, the slab
of surface temperature maps even in the       surfaces can also he curved, hut their
presence of relatively high thermal           curvature may be ignored if the layer
gradients. Correspondingly, the heat flux     affected by the input heat flux is much
sensor may become two-dimensional as
·well. In particular, infrared thermography
can be fruitfully employed to measure
                                              Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 519
smaller than the local radius of curvature    normal to the sensor surface is related to a
of the slab.                                  radial temperature difference, in the
                                              direction parallel to the plane of the
    In the following, ideal one~dimensional   gage.S1 This sensor is practically of no use
sensors are considered. Some of them will     in infrared thermography.
be extended to the multidimensional
case.s7,SS The term ideal means that              Application of infrared scanning
thennophysical properties of the sensor       radiometry to both the thick film and the
material are assumed to be independent        gradic11t sensors is not easily performed.
of temperature and that the influence of
the actual temperature sensing element is        Theoretical treatment of the relevant
not considered.                               steady state techniques56·tl0 and transient
                                              techniques0H>3 lies outside the scope of
    The most commonly used                    the present discussion.
one~dimensional sensor models are:
                                              Applications
Thin Film Sensor. A very thin resistance
thermometer (film) classically measures       Two different fluid flow configurations are
the surface temperature of a thermal/}'       analyzed by means of infrared
thicker slab to which it is bonded. Heat      thermography: a jet of fluid impinging on
flux is inferred from the theory of heat      a flat plate and a circular cylinder in a
conduction in a semiinfinite                  wind tunnel. In the first configuration
one~dimensional wall. The surface film        average heat transfer data will be
must be so thin that it has a negligible      discussed whereas for the second one a
heat capacity and thermal resistance as       detailed description of the convective heat
compared to the slab's. To use this sensor    transfer coefficient will be given. For both
with infrared thermography, the heat          experiments, the convective heat transfer
exchanging surface must be necessarily        coefficient is measured by means of the
viewed by infrared scanning radiometry.       heated thin foil technique.
Thick Film Sensor. The slab is used as a      Impinging jets
calorimeter; heat flux is obtained from the
time rate of change of the mean slab          Heat transfer between impinging jets and
temperature. This temperature is usuaiJy      a plate has been the subject matter of
measured by using the slab as a resistance    several studiesM·67 because of their wide
thermometer.                                  use for heating, cooling or drying surfaces
                                              in many industrial applications.
Wall Calorimeter or Thin Skin Sensor. The
slab is made thermally thin (so that its         The target plate is a thin constantan
temperature can be assumed to be              foil, 50 [1111 (0.002 in.) thick, heated by
constant across its thickness) and, as in     the joule effect. The jet is obtained by
the previous sensor, is used as a             flowing air, coming from a compressor,
calorimeter. Heat flux is typically inferred  trough a truncated cone nozzle 80 mm
from the time rate of change of the slab      (3.2 in.) long and with an exit section of
temperature usually measured by a             diameter D::::: 10 mm (0.4 in.). 1\\•o
thermocouple. To use this sensor ·with        different nozzle plate configurations are
infrared thermography, either one of the      considered: an open one with the nozzle
slab's surfaces generally can be viewed by    externally joined to a slender stagnation
infrared scanning radiometry.                 chamber and a closed one with the nozzte
                                              submerged into the stagnation chamber
Gradient Sensor. In this sensor the           that ends with a 300 x 300 mm (12 x
temperature difference across the slab        12 in.) flat plate that is parallel to the
thickness is measured. By considering a       target plate having the same dimensions.
steady state heat transfer process, heat      In the second case the spent air is
flux is computed by means of the              exhausted through the gap between the
temperature gradient across the slab. The     two parallel plates: one that is flush
temperature difference is usually             mounted at the exit section of the nozzle
measured by thermopiles made of               (top plate) and the other one that is the
very-thin~ribbon thermocouples or by two      target plate. In particular, the top plate
thin film resistance thermometers.            embodies a serpentine passage through
                                              which a thermostatic liquid flows that
Heated Thin Foil Sensor. This technique       allows majntaining its surface temperature
consists of steadily heating a thermally      equal to the air stagnation temperature.
thin metalHc foil or a printed circuit
board by the joule effect and by                 Tests are carried out by varying the
measuring the heat transfer coefficient       reynolds number (based on the nozzle
from an overall energy balance. Also in       exit diameter) and the impingement
this case, due the thinness of the foil,      distance Z (bet\veen nozzle exit and target
either one of the slab's surfaces can be      plate) for the two different exhau~t areas
vie\ved by infrared scanning radiometry.      (open or closed). Data, generally averaged
                                              over each circumference of given radius, is
   Strictly speaking, there is another type
of one~dimensional sensor, the circular
gardon gage, in \Vhich the heat flux
520 Infrared and Thermal Testing
reduced in dimensionless form in terms of     radiometer takes into account its
the nusselt number based on the               presence.
diameter D).
                                                 To measme temperatures in the whole
   For short impingement distances, the       heated zone and to account for the
small gap between the nozzle exit section     directional emissivity coefficient, three
and the target plate does not allow the jet   thermal images in the azimuthal direction
air, after impingement, to fluw directly to   are taken and patched up. In particular to
ambient; a part of this air tends to come     reduce the measurement noise, each
back towards the nozzle exit giving rise to   image is obtained by averaging 32
recirculation patterns. Separation over the   thermograms in a time sequence. Because
target plate occurs at about 1.2 D from the   of the end _conduction effects near the
jet center where the vertical component       forebody, the portion of the cylinder for
of the jet velocity is decelerated and        which the infrared camera gives reliable
transformed into a horizontal one.67 At       data actually starts at X·D-1 == 0.2 (x being
small Z values, the flow separates in the     the coordinate along the cylinder axis)
open case but it reattaches downstream at     and data are reported up to x·D ·1 :::: 5.68
about 2 D. Separation and reattachment        This zone is precisely identified by putting
of the jet flow give rise, in terms of heat   markers over the cylinder surface. The
transfer, to a local minimum in the           markers are useful also to patch up the
nusselt number distribution at about 1.2      various thermal images.
D and to a local maximum at about 2 D.
On the contrary, in the closed case the          The flow field around a cylindrical
flow is prevented from a strong               body is characterized by separation and
reattachment and tends most likely to he      reattachment of the flow, ·which can be
transformed into recirculation patterns.      inferred from the distribution of the heat
                                              transfer coefficients. The heat transfer
   The recirculating air coming back          coefficients are computed in
toward the nozzle exit causes forced          nondimensional form in terms of the
mixing and entails a general decrease of      nusselt number based on cylinder
the local nusselt number for the closed       diameter. It must be noted that the
case and short impingement distances.         location of the maximum nusselt number
Recirculation effects are stronger for the    does not exactly coincide with that of
closed configuration at short                 flow reattachmentf'9 However, the
impingement distances (Z ~ 10 D). As          position of the maximum nusselt number
Z·D--1 increases (above z.J)-1 :::: 10), the  can be considered to determine the length
                                              of the thermal separation bubble.68
exhaust area between the two plates
becomes wider and allows the spent air to         Results of the present investigation
freely flow into ambient \Vithout major       confirm the fundamental role played by
differences between the two                   freestream turbulence in the formation of
configurations.                               the leading edge separation bubble?0•71 In
                                              the sharp edged cylinder the separation
Circular Cylinder                             bubble appears shorter on the windward
                                              side than on the leeward side, and there
The employed longitudinal cylinder has        assumes also higher nusselt number
an outer diameter D = 40 mm (1.6 in.), an     values. On the contrary, for the round
overall streamwise length of 300 mm           nosed cylinder two thermal reattachment
(12 in.) and its lateral surface is made out  points are present on the lee\-vard side. A
of a printed circuit board (bonded to a       likely explanation for this is that the
fiberglass layer) so as to generate a         separation bubble disappears on the
constant joule heat flux over it. The         windward side giving rise to the
copper conducting tracks of the printed       formation of two vortices, which can he
circuit are 35 pm (1.4 x 10-3 in.) thick,     assumed to coincide with saddle points 72
3 mm (0.12 in.) wide, placed at 4 mm          on either side of the nodal separation
(0.16 in.) pitch and aligned                  point on the leeward side.
perpendicularly to the cylinder axis. Two
different configurations of the cylinder
leading edge (nose) arc tested: a sharp
edge nose and a hemispherical blunt one.
   Tests are performed in an open circuit
wind tunnel having a 300 x 400 mm
(12 x 16 in.) rectangular test section that
is 1.1 m (43 in.) long. The free stream
turbulence intensity of the tunnel is quite
low and lies in the range 0.08 to
0.12 percent depending on the testing
conditions. The access window for the
infrared e<unera to the test sertion of tlw
wind tunnel is made of bidirectional
polyethylene; calibration of the
                                              Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 521
References
1. \,Valker, j.L., S.S. Russell, M.D. Lansing   1). Ouyang, Z. et al. "Novel Measurement
   and P.A. Caraccioli. "Thermographic             of Anisotropic Thermal Diffusivity."
   Nondestructive Evaluation of the                Rel'iew ofProsrcss in Quantitaliw
   Space Shuttle Main Engine Nozzle."              Nmufestructive Emluotiou. Vol. 17. New
  4th Conference 011 Aerospace Materials,          York, NY: Plenum Press (1998):
  Processes and Environmental Teclmolosr           p 453-456.
   !Huntsville, Alabama, September
   2000]. CD-ROM. Huntsville, AL:               9. Krapez, J.-C. "Simultaneous
   National Aeronautics and Space                  Measurement of In-Plane and Out of
   Administration (2000): p 20.                    Plane Diffusivity by Using a Grid-Like
                                                   Mask." Presented at 5th Jntemational
2. Walker, j.L., M.D. Lansing and S.S.             H1orkslwp on Advanced Infrared
                                                   Tedmolos)' and Applications [Venice,
  Russell. "Thermographic Analysis 6r               Italy, September 1999].
                                               10. Favro, L.D. and H.L Thomas. "Thermal
   Composite Cobonds on the X~33.u 4th             \·Vave Hardware Evolution Using the
  Conference on Aerospace 1\faterials,             NDI Validation Center." Materials
   Processes and Em'ironmental Teclmulosy
   [Huntsville, Alabama, September                 Emluation. Vol. 53, No. 7. Columbus,
   2000]. CD-ROM. Huntsville, AL:                  Oil: American Society for
   National Aeronautics and Space                  Nondestructive Testing (July 1995):
   Administration (2000): p 23.                    p 840-843.
3. Hoskin, B.C. and A.A. Backer, eds.          11. Borg, S.B. "Thermal Imaging with Real
                                                   Time Picture Presentation." Applied
  Composite Materials for Aircraft                 Optics. Vol. 7, No. 9. \r\rashington, DC:
  Stractures. AIAA Education Series. New           Optical Society of America (1968):
   York, NY: American Institute of                 p 1697-1703.
   Aeronautics and Astronautics (1986):
   p 153-156.                                  12. Kutzscher, E.\'V. et 111. "A Scanning lR
                                                   Inspection System Applied to
4. Walker, j.L., S.S. Russell and G.L.             Nondestructive Testing of Bonded
   \r\'orkman. "Thermographic                      Aerospace Structures." Vol. 7, No. 9.
   Quantification of Graphite/Epoxy                \r\1ashington, DC: Optical Society of
   Instrumentation Racks." SPIE                     America (1968): p 1715-1720.
   Proceedings, Vol. 3397. Bellingham,
   \VA: International Society for Optical      13. Thomas, R.L., J.J. Pouch, Y.H. \Vong,
                                                   L.D. Favro, P.K. Kuo and
   Engineering (1998): p 141-148.                  A. RosenC\\'aig. 11Subsurface na\\'
                                                   Detection in lvfctals by Photoacoustic
5. Winfree, W.P. and D.M. Heath.
   '''fhermal Diffusivity Imaging of               :!vficroscopy." Journal of Applied Pll)'.\in.
   Aerospace Materials and Structures."            Vol. 51. London, United Kingdom:
  Thennosense XX. SPIE Proceedings,                 Institute of Physics (1980): p 1152.
   Vol. 3361. Bellingham, \r\'A:
   International Society for Optical           14. Crowther, D.J., L.D. J;avro, P.K. Kuo
                                                   and R.L. Thomas. "An Inverse
   Engineering (1998): p 282-290.                  Scattering Algorithm Applied to
6. Philippi, L et al. "!vfeasurement of             Infrared Thermal \•Vave Images."
   Thermal Diffusivities through                   joumal o(Applied Physics. Vol. 74.
   Processing of Infrared Images." Review          London, United Kingdom: Institute of
   of'Scientific lnstrummts. Vol. 66, No. 1.        Physics (1993): p 5828-5834.
   Melville, NY: American Institute of
   Physics (1995): p 182·192.                  15. Favro, L.D., T. Ahmed, X. Han,
                                                    L. \'Vang, X. \'\'ang, Y. \>\'ang, I'.K. Kuo,
7. Krapez, j.-C. and G. Gardette.                  R.L. Thom11s and S.M. Shepard.
   "Characterization of Anisotropic                 "Thermal \".'ave Imaging of Aircraft
   rvfaterials by Steady-State and                 Structures." Review o(Progres.~ in
   Modulated Thermal Ellipsometry."                Qtunllitative N01u1L'stntcli1'e EvaltlllfiOJJ.
  1-ligll Temperatures-High Pressures.              Vol. 14. New York, NY: Plenum Press
   Vol. 30, No. 5 /Papers from tile 14tll           (1995): p 461-466.
   European Conference un Thermupii)'Sical
   Properties}. London, United Kingdom:
   Pion Limited (1998): p 567-574.
522 Infrared and Thermal Testing
16. Favro, L.D., X. Han, Y. \'\'ang, P.K. Kuo    26. jones, TS. and H. Berger.
                                                     "Thermographic Detection of Impact
    and R.L. Thomas. "Puise·Echo Thermal
    Wave Jm:Iging.'' Ret'iew of Progress i11 1       Damage in Graphite-Epoxy
    QIIalltitative No11destructive EvallwtiOJI.      Composites." Materials Evaluation.
                                                     Vol. 50, No. 12. Columbus, OH:
    Vol. 14A. Ne\v York, NY: Plenum
    (1995): p 425-429.                               American Society for Nondestructive
                                                     Testing (December 1992):
17. Favro, L.D., X. Han, P.K. Kuo and R.L.
    Thomas. "Imaging the Early Time                  p 1446-1453.
                                                 27. Hilton, P.D. and P.\·V. Kopf. "Aerospace
    Behavior of Reflected Thermal·\'\1ave
    Pulses." Proceedings ofSPJE Tliemwsense          Market for Composites Poised to Take
    XFJJ. Bellingham, VVA: International             Off." Research and Del'elopment.
    Society for Optical Engineering (1995).          Vol. 31, No.2. Oak Brook, IL: Cahners
18. Favro, L.D., P.K. Kuo and KL. Thomas.
                                                     Scientific, Division of Reed Elsevier
    "ReaJ.'J'ime Thermal \·Vave Imaging."            (February 1989): p 94-101.
    Photothermal ami Plwtoacoustic Science
    and Teclmolog)~ Vol. 2: Nondestructive       28. jones, T.S. and II. Berger,
    Evaluation (NDE). Upper Saddle River,            "Nondestructive Evaluation lvlethods
    NJ: I'TR Prentice Hall (1994): p 23-51.          for Composites." International
19. Favro, L.D., P.K. Kuo, R.L. Thomas,              Encyclopedia ofAdm11ced Cumpmites.
                                                     Vol. 4. New York, NY: VCH Publishers
    T. Ahmed, X. Han and X. \'\1ang.
                                                      (1990): p 37-49.
    "Progress in the Development of              29. King, D.C., H.D. Lawson and ll.J.
    Pulse-Echo Thermal \·Vave Imaging for
    NDE." Review of Progress in Quantitative         Romine. Nondestmrtiw Evaluation of
    NDE. Vol. 13. New York, NY: Plenum               Large Scale Composite Components.
    (1994): p 395-399.                               AFWAl.-TR87-4118. Wright-Patterson
20. Favro, L.D., T. Ahmed, X. \'\fang,               Air Force Base, OH: Air Force Report
    Y.X. Wang, H.j. jin, P.K. Kuo and
                                                     \·Vright Research and Development
    R.L. Thomas. "Thermal \.Yave                     Center (1987).
    Detection and Analysis of Adhesion           30.jacobs, B., D. Hamlin, R. Peterson and
                                                     R. Spinks. Co1nposites ln-Sen'ire
    Disbands and Corrosion in Aircraft               Inspection System Producibilit}'. Air Force
    Panels.u Revieti' of Progress in                 Report AFWAL-TR-884218.
    Quantitative NDE. Vol. 12. New York,
    NY: Plenum (1993): p 2021-2025.                  V\'right·Patterson Air Force Base, OH:
                                                      \'Vright Research and Development
21. \'Vong, Y.H., R.L. Thomas and                     Center (1988).
    G.F. Hawkins. "Surface and Subsurface        31. ASTM E 1213-87, Standard Test Metlwd
                                                     for 1\1iuiumm Resolvable Ternpemture
    Structure of Solids by Laser                     Difference for Thermal Imaging Systems.
    Photoacoustic Spectroscopy." Applied              1987. West Conshohocken, PA:
    Physics Letters. Vol. 32. Melville, NY:
    American Institute of Physics (1978):            American Society for Testing and
    p 538.                                             ~v1aterials.
22. Burleigh, D.B. "JR Techniques in the
                                                 32. ASTM E 1311-89, Standard Test Method
    Aerospace Industry." Infrared                    for Minimum Detectable Temperature
    Metlwdology and Technology.                      DiflCrence for Tllermallmaging Systems.
     Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach                 \'\'est Conshohocken, PA: American
    Science Publishers (1994): p 429-452.            Society for Testing and Materials
23. ·winfree, W.P. ''New Nondestructive
                                                      (1989).
    Technique for Inspection of Aircraft         33. Infrared issue. }.,.faterials Emluatio11.
    Structures." NDE ofAging Aircraft,
    Aitports and Aerospace Hardware. SPIE             Vol. 45, No. 4. Columbus, OH:
    Proceedings, Vol. 2945. BeHingham,                American Society for Nondestructive
    \'\'A: International Society for Optical         Testing (April 1987).
    Engineering (1996): p 77-83.                 34. Infrared issue. Optical Eugineering.
24. Ducar, R.J. "Pulsed Thermographic
                                                      Vol. 30, No. 11. Bellingham, WA:
    Inspection and Application in
    Commercial Aircraft Repairs"                      International Society for Optical
    Tllemwscnse XXI. SPIE Proceedings,                Engineering (November 1991).
    Vol. 3700. llellingham, WA:
                                                 35. Maldague, X., ].C. Krapez and P. Cielo.
    International Society for Optical                 "Temperature Recovery and Contrast
     Engineering (1999): p 77-83.
                                                      Computations in NDE Thermographic
25. Del Grande, N.K. et al. "Dynamic                  Imaging Systems." Journal of
    Thermal Tomography for                           Nondestructive Emluatiou. Vol. 10,
                                                      No. 1. New York1 NY: Plenum Press
    Nondestructive Inspection of Aging                (Marcil 1991): p 19-30.
    Aircraft." Nondestructiw Inspection of       36. Wolfe, \'\'.L. and G.]. Zissis. Tire ln(rared
    Aging Airaa{l. SPIE Proceedings,                 Handbook. \'\1ashington, DC: Office of
    Vol. 2001. Bellingham, \'\'A:                     Naval Research, Department of the
     International Society for Optical                Navy (1985).
    Engineering (1993): p 66-77.
                                                 Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 523
37. Henneke, E.G., II, and T.S. jones.          46. !\•fahoon, A. "Automated Eddy Current
                                                    Testing of Composites." Proceedings
    "Detection of Damage in Composite               20tlllntcmational SAMPE Technical
    Materials by Vibrothermography. 11              Conference. Vol. 20, Covina, CA:
    Nondestructive Evaluation and Flaw              Society for the Advancement of
                                                    Materi;ll and Process Engineering
   Criticality of Composite Materials.
                                                    (1988): p 517-523.
    Special Technical Publication 696.          47. Chamis, C.C. "Simplified Composite
    West Conshohocken, PA: American
                                                    Micromechanics Equations for
    Society for Testing and Materials               Mechanical, Thermal, and
    (1979): p 83-95.                                  Moisture~Related Properties.~~ Engineer~'>
38. Hinton, Y.L., R.). Shuford and C.G.
                                                    Guide to Composite Materials. Materials
    Pergantis. "Applications of Real-Time           Park, OH: AS~vf International (1987):
    Thermography for NDT of
    Composites." Tllennoseme \fill.                 p 3·8-3·24.
    [Cambridge, MA, November 1984].             48. jones, T.S., T.M. Hsieh and H. Berger.
    SPlE Proceedings. Bellingham, WA:               Portable 1/wmograpllic Inspection fOr
                                                    Composites. Final Technical Report,
    International Society for Optical               Contract No. DAAL04-91-C-0023.
    Engineering.
                                                    \·Vatertown, i'vfA: Army !'vfaterials
39. Maldague, X., P.G. Cielo, D. Poussart,          Technology Laboratory (1991 ).
    D. Craig and R. Bourret. "Transient
                                                49. Vavilov, V. et al. "Infrared
  xnThermographic NDE of Turbine
                                                    Thermographic Detection and
    Blades. II Thermosense SPIE,                    Characterization of Impact Damage in
    Vol. 1313,1990, pp. 161-171.
                                                    Carbon Fibre Composites: Results of
40. Reynolds, W.N. and G.M. Wells.                  the Round Robin Test." Qua11titati\'e
    "Video-Compatible Thermography.~~
    British journal of Nondestructh•e Testing.       lnfmred '11wrmogmpir)' (QIRT 98) IL6dz,
    Vol. 26, No. 1. Northampton, United             Poland, September 1998j. L6dz,
    Kingdom: British Institute of                   Poland: Institute of Electronics,
    Non-Destructive Testing (January                Technical University of Lo(.lz, for
    1984): p 40-44.                                 Association of Electrical Engineers,
41. Welch, C.S., W.P. Winfree, D.M. Heath,           Po1ish Committee of OptoElectronics
    E. Cramer and P. Howell. "Material               (2000): p 43-52.
    Property Measurements ·with                 SO. Poon, C., C. E. Chapman and R.H'.
    Post-Processed Thermal image Data. 11            Gould. "Nondestructive
    Themwse/ISe Xl!. SPIE Proceedings,
    Vol. 1313. Bellingham, WA:                      Characterization of Impact Damage in
                                                    Composites." CSNDT foumal. Vol. 13,
    International Society for Optical                No. 1. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada:
    Engineering (1990): p 124-133.
42. Wilson, D.W. and ].A. Charles.                  Canadian Society for Nondestructive
    "Thermographic Detection of Adhesive            Testing Oanuary~February 1992):
                                                    p 14-30.
    Bond and lnterlaminar Flaws in
    Composites." Experimental j\<feclwnics.     51. Gardon, R. "A Transducer for the
    Vol. 21, No. 7. Bethel, CT: Society for         'Measurement of Heat Flow Rate."
    Experimental Mechanics (July 1981):             joumal of Heat 1hmsfC'r. Vol. R2. New
                                                     York, NY: American Society of
    p 276-280.                                       Mechanical Engineers (1960):
43. Vavilov, V.P. and R. Taylor. Research           p 396-398.
    Techniques in Nondestructive Testing,       52. Scott, C.]. Transient Expcrimmtal
    VoL S: Theoretical ami Practical Aspects        Ttxlmiques for Sur(acl' Heat Flux Rates,
    of Thermal Noudestructiw Testing of             MeasureJne11ts Tech11iqttes in Heat
    Bonded Structures. New York, NY:                Trans{cr. AGARDograph 130. Paris,
    Academic Press (1982): p 239-279.                France: Advisory Group for Aerospace
                                                     Research and Development (1970):
44. Schmidt, G.\-\1., R.G. Hier, S. Benyamin         p 309-328.
    and S.E. De Forest. "Real~Time Locally
                                                53. \'\1illeke, K. and D. Bershader. "An
    Adaptive Contrast Enhancement of
    rvfedical Images by an Inexpensive               Improved Thin-Film Gauge for
    Modular Image Processor." Medical                Shock-Tube Thermal Studies." Rel'iew
    Imaging 11: Image Formation Detection,          of'Scienlif/c instruments. VoL 44.
    Processing mullnterpretation. Vol. 914.          College Park, 1vfD: American Institute
    Bellingham, VVA: International Society
                                                     of Physics (1973): p 22-25.
    for Optical Engineering (1988):             54. B<tines, D.j. "Selecting Unsteady Heat
    p 736-741.
45. Vernon, S.N. Eddy Current inspection o(         Flux Sensors." Instrumentation and
    Graphite~Epoxy. Technical Report                Control Systems. Nashua, NH: Penn Well
    NSWC-TR-87-148. Silver Spring, MD:               (1972): p 80-83.
    Naval Surface VVarfare Center (1987).       55. Thompson, \.Y.P. "Heat Transfer
                                                    Gages." Methods of Experimental
                                                    Pllysics. Vol. 18B. San Diego, CA:
                                                     Academic Press (1981 ): p 663-685.
524 Infrared and Thermal Testing
56. Balageas, D.L., D.M. Boscher,            65. Baughn, ].\•V., A. E. Hechanova and Yan
                                                 Xiaojun. "An Expe~imental Study of
   A.A. Deom, J. Fournier and                     Entrainment Effects on the Heat
                                                 Transfer from a Flat Surface to a
    G. Gardette. "lv1easurement of
                                                  Heated Circular Impinging .Jet." fuumal
    Convective Heat-Transfer Coefficients        ofHe(it Trausfcr. Vol. 113. New York,
    in V\'ind Tunnels Using Passive and           NY: American Society of !vfechanical
    Stimulated Infrared Thermography."            Engineers (1991): p 1023-1025.
    La Reclu:rclle Atrospatiale. No. 4.
    Chatillon, France: Office Nationale      66. Viskanta, R. "Heat Transfer to
    d'Etudes Recherches Aerospatiales             Impinging Isotherm<~ I Gas and Flames
    (1991): p Sl-72.
57. Carlomagno, G.M.                             jets." Experimental Thermal ami Fluid
                                                 Science. Vol. 6. Ne·w York, NY: Elsevier
     11Thermo-Fiuid-Dynamics Applications         (1993): p 111-134.
    of Quantitative Infrared                 67. Martin, H. "Heat and l\•1ass Transfer
    Thermography." foumal of Flow                 between Impinging Gas jets and Solid
    \'isualizatiun and Image Prvcessins.         Surfaces." Adl'ances i11 Heal Timlsfer.
    Vol. 4. New York, NY: Begell House            Vol. 13. San Diego, CA: Academic
    (1997): p 261-280.                           Press (1977): p 1-60.
58. DeLuca, L., G. Cardo:ri.e, GJvf.
    Carlomagno, D. Aymer and T. Alziary.     68. Cardone, G., G. Ruresti and G.J\·f.
     "Flow Visualization and Heat Transfer        Carlomagno. uHeat Transfer to Air
                                                  from a Y<1wed Circular Cylinder." Alias
     Measurements in Hypersonic Wind             of Visualization Ill. Ch. 10. Baton
    Tunnel." Experimental Heat Transfi'r.         Rouge, LA: CRC Press (1997):
    Vol. 5. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and         p 153-168.
    Francis (1992): p 65-79.
59. Meola, C., L. de Luca and G.M.           69. Sparrow, EJvL, S.S. Kang and \·V.
     Carlomagno. "Influence of Shear Layer
                                                  Chuck. "Relation helween the Points
     Dynamics on Impingement Heat                 of J;luw Reattachment and lvfaximum
    Transfer." Experimental Thermal and
    Fluid Science. Vol. 13. New York, NY:         Heat Transfer for Hegions of How
    Elsevier Science (1996): p 29-37.            Separation." Iutemational foumal of
60. Astarita, T. Alcuni Aspetti di Scambiu       Heat and l\Jass Transfer. Vol. 30.
    Termicu neUe Turbine a Gas. Ph.D.             Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier
    dissertation. Naples, Italy: University       Science, Pergamon Press (1987):
     of Naples (1996).                            p 1237-1246.
61. Baines, D.J. "Selecting Unsteady Heat    70. Carlomagno, G.M. "Heat Transfer
     Flux Sensors.11 Instrumentation all(/        ~v1easurements and Flow Visualization
    Control Systems. Nashua, NH: Penn\•Veil       Performed by 1\·feans of Infrared
    (1972): p 80-83.                             Thermography." Heat Transfer in Sinslc
                                                  Phase Flows 4. Eurotherm Seminar 46
62. Cook, W.j. and E.). Felderman.
    "Reduction of Data from Thin-Film             ll'isa, Italy]. Paris, France: Editions
     Heat-Transfer Gages: A Concise               Europeennes Techniques et Industries
                                                  (1995): p 45-52.
    Numerical Technique." AIAA Joumal.       71. Carlomagno, G.M. "Quantitative
     Vol. 4. New York, NY: American               Infrared Thermography in Heat and
     Institute of Aeronautics and                Fluid Flow." Optical Methods and Data
     Astronautics (1966): p 561-562.              Processiug in Heal and Fluid Fluw.
63. De Luca, L., G. Cardone, D. Aymer de
                                                  !MechE Conference Transactions
     Ia Chevalerie and A. Fonteneau.              1966-3. London, United Kingdom:
     "Experimental Analysis of Viscous
                                                  Institute of Mechanical Engineers
     Interaction in Hypersonic \rVedge            (1996): p 279-290.
     Flow.11 AIAA Journal. Vol. 33, No. 12.
                                             72. D.]. Peake and M. Tobak.
     New York, NY: American Institute of
    Aeronautics and Astronautics (1995):           Three-Dimemional Flows about Simple
    p 2293-2298.
                                                 Components at Angle of Attack.
64. Goldstein, R.J., A.l. Behbani and             AGARD-LS-121, Paper 2. Paris, France:
    K.K. Heppelmann. "Streamwise                  Advisory Group for Aerospace
     Distribution of the Recovery Factor          Research and Development (1982).
     and the Local Heat Transfer
     Coefficient to an Impinging Circular
     Air jet." International ]oumal of Heat
     muf Mass Tmns{et; Vol. 29. Oxford,
     United Kingdom: Elsevier Science,
     Pergamon Press (1986): p 1227-1235.
                                             Aerospace Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 525
Various Components
Bibliography                                  Dillenz, A., T. Zweschper and G. Busse.
Coatings                                      "Elastic VVave Burst Thermography for
Gopalsami, N. and Douglas N. Rose.            NDE of Subsurface Features." !might.
     "Thermal~\'\'ave Characterization of
    Diffusion Coatings." Materials            Vol. 42, No; 12. Northampton, United
     Evaluatioll. Vol. 48, No. 7. Columbus,
     OH: American Society for                 Kingdom: British lnstitute for
     Nondestructive Testing (july 1990):
     p 890-893, 897.                          Nondestructive Testing (December
Almond, D.P., P.M. Patel and 1-1. Reiter.         2000): p 815-817.
     "The Testing of PJasma~Sprayed           Hagemaier, D.J. "'fhermal Insulation
    Coatings by Thermal-\Vave
    Interferometry." Materials Evaluation.    Moisture Detection." Materials
     Vol. 45, No. 4. Columbus, OH:
     American Society for Nondestructive      Evaluation. Vol. 28, No. 3. Columbus,
     Testing (April 1987): p 471-475.
                                              OH: American Society for
Bentz, D.P. and j.W. Martin.
     "Thermographic Imaging of Surface        Nondestructive Testing (March 1970):
     Finish Defects in Coatings on Metal
     Substrates." Materials Et'aluation.      p 55-60.                              .
     Vol. 50, No. 2. Columbus, OH:
     American Society for Nondestructive      }vlehrotra, Y., H. Kaplan and G. Slensk1.
     Testing (February 1992): p 242-246,
     252.                                     "Active Infrared Thermography for
 ~vfansour, T.M. "Nondestructive Thickness    Nondestructive Testing of Cable
     Measurement of Phosphate Coatings
     hy Infrared Absorption." Materials       Insulation: A Progress Report." ASNT\
     Evaluation. Vol. 41, No.3. Columbus,
      OH: American Society for                Infrared 11Iermosrapll)' Topical
      Nondestructive Testing (lvfarch 1983):
      p 302-308.                              Conference !Cleveland, OH]. Columlms,
 Composites                                   OH: American Society for
 Green, D.R. "Thermal and Infrared            Nondestructive Testing Oune 1997):
      Nondestructive Testing of Composites
     and Ceramics." Materials Evaluation.     p 63-71.
      Vol. 29, No. II. Columbus, OH:
      American Society for Nondestructive     Thompson, KG. and E.M. Crisman.
      Testing (November 1971): p 241-248.
                                              "Thermographic Inspection of
 Russell, S.S. and E.G. Henneke, II.
      "Vibrothermographic Inspection of a     Solid-Fuel Rocket Booster Field Joint
      Glass-Fiber Epoxy 1vfachine Part."
      Materials Emluatiou. VoL 49, No.7.      Components." J..·faterials Evaluation.
      Columbus, OH: American Society for
      Nondestructive Testing (July 1991):     VoL 48, No.9. Columbus, OH:
      p 870-874.
                                              American Society for Nondestructive
  Spicer, J.B., ].L. Champion, R. Osiander
      andj.\·V.M. Spicer. "Time Resolved      Testing (September 1990):
      Shearographic and Thermographic
      NDE :rvfethods for Graphite             p 1096-1099.
       Epoxy/Honeycomb Composite.''
      Materials Emluation. Vol. 54, No. 10.   Walker, j.L., S.S. Russell and G.L.
       Columbus, OH: American Society for
       Nondestructive Testing (October        \.Yorkman. "Applications of Thermal
       1996): p 1210-1213.
                                              Imaging to Aerospace Structures." .
                                              ASNT's 1997 Spring Con(ereuce and S1xtll
                                              Ammal Research Symposium; Refining
                                              Quality witll NDT. Columbus, OH:
                                              American Society for Nondestructive
                                              Testing (1997): p 65-67.
                                              Walker, j.L. and S.S. Russell.           _
                                              "Thermographic Leak Detection of the
                                              Space Shuttle ;\.·fain Engine Nozzle."
                                              ASNT Sprillg Confermce and 8th Anmwl
                                              Research S}'mposium Paper Swnarics.
                                              Columbus, OH: American Society for
                                              Nondestructive Testing (1999):
                                              p 82-84.
526 Infrared and Thermal Testing
16
                                            CH APT ER
Elect ric Pow er Applicat ions
    of Infrared and Thermal
                               Test ing
                                       Blair R. Bosworth, Foseco, Conneaut, Ohio (Part 5)
                                       Motokuni Eto, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute,
                                       Ibaraki, Japan (Part 4)
                                       Toshimitsu Ishii, Japan Atomic Energy Research
                                       Institute, Ibaraki, Japan (Part 4)
                                       David L. Mader, Ontario Hydro Technologies, Toronto,
                                       Ontario, Canada (Part 6)
                                       Yoshizo Okamoto, East Asia University, Shemonoseki,
                                       Japan (Part 3)
                                       Lars Persson, Västerås, Sweden (Part 7)
                                       Raymond R. Rayl, Consumers Energy, Jackson,
                                       Michigan (Part 6)
                                       R. James Seffrin, Infraspection Institute, Burlington,
                                       New Jersey (Part 5)
                                       Steven M. Shepard, Thermal Wave Imaging, Ferndale,
                                       Michigan (Part 5)
                                       John R. Snell, Jr., Snell Infrared, Montpelier, Vermont
                                       (Part 2)
                                       Andrew C. Teich, FLIR Systems, Portland, Oregon
                                       (Part 1)
                                       Stig-Björn Westberg, Vattenfall Utveckling AB,
                                       Älvkarleby, Sweden (Part 7)
                                       Paul A. Zayicek, Electric Power Research Institute,
                                       Charlotte, North Carolina (Part 5)
PART 1. Thermographic Systems for Power
Generation and Distribution1
All utilities and their customers depend     Range of Applications
on system reliability. When outages occur,
utilities are forced to produce and          Thermography is cost effective within the
distribute power that is more expensive.     power generation and distribution
In the past, the best means of reducing      industries because of its multitude of
the number of forced outages was through     applications, ranging from the monitoring
preventive maintenance, which required       of electrical connections and switching
the replacement of specific components       equipment to the evaluation of
after a certain life span, whether the       mechanical equipment and fluid transfer
component needed replacement or not.         systems.2-8
Although better than breakdown
maintenance, preventive maintenance              One of the most common applications
often leaves components untouched that       involves monitoring electrical distribution
should be replaced.                          systems, from transmission lines to motor
                                             control centers. Electrical systems
    Many utilities have discovered that the  typically suffer from problems such as
best way to reduce outages is to find and    loose connections, load imbalances and
correct failing components before they       corrosion. These problems cause an
become major problems that cause             increase in impedance to current,
interruption in service. One of the easiest  resulting in resistive heating. If left
and most cost effective methods is           unchecked, this heat can build to a point
predictive maintenance with infrared         at which connections melt — breaking
thermography.                                the circuit and in some cases creating
                                             fires. Thermography is well suited to this
    All equipment that conducts,             application because thermography quickly
consumes or generates power will also        locates hot spots and determines the
emit heat as a result of energy loss in the  severity of the problem and how soon the
system. Typically, when these components     equipment should be repaired.
become less efficient at doing their job,
the heat they emit will increase. Often,         Some microprocessor based
the temperature of a faulty component        quantitative infrared test systems can
will increase rapidly before failure.        perform trend analysis, letting the
Thermography lets plant engineers            maintenance team set up periodic
evaluate the thermal condition of a wide     intervals for equipment inspections. The
variety of plant and substation equipment    data are then stored in a database of
through the use of infrared cameras that     thermal images, which logs images and
produce high resolution thermal video        corresponding test data. The program
images in color or black and white. These    then displays multiple images of the same
images can quickly and easily uncover        component surveyed over a period of
potential problems in electrical and         several months. The temperature rise of
mechanical systems.                          the object is plotted to determine the
                                             temperature increase trend. When the
    An increasing number of plant            slope of the temperature rise curve
maintenance teams now use thermal            changes suddenly, this change typically
imaging systems to evaluate and predict      indicates an impending failure (Fig. 1).
the failure of many types of equipment
within power generation and distribution         Thermographic trend analysis can be
systems. Today’s portable thermal imaging    applied to indoor components such as
measurement systems can provide high         motor control centers, breaker panels and
resolution live images that can be stored    disconnect switches and transformers, as
on conventional videotape recorders or       well as on outdoor components in
on built-in floppy disk drives. These        substations — switchgear, transformers
images can be retrieved for later analysis   and output current boosters. Utilities
in personal computer based image             including Pacific Gas and Electric (San
processing programs. Some systems even       Francisco, California), Florida Power and
allow detailed playback analysis within      Light (Miami, Florida), Northern States
the basic system electronics.                Power (Minneapolis, Minnesota) and
                                             Texas Utility Systems (Dallas, Texas), have
                                             adopted programs for regularly surveying
                                             their substations with thermal imaging
528 Infrared and Thermal Testing
equipment in an effort to maximize                               popup periscopes housing infrared
                     efficiency and reliability.                                      systems and video cameras. The cameras
                                                                                      are controlled by a motorized pan-and-tilt
                         Thermography is also highly effective                        device operated by a technician within
                     in evaluating a utility’s many miles of                          the van. Also, built into the rear of the
                     transmission and distribution lines.                             van is a workstation with two monitors
                     Modular thermographic systems where                              for display of the visual and thermal
                     the camera is separate from the                                  images, a laptop computer for storing
                     electronics are ideal for surveys conducted                      statistical data and a video printer for
                     from either a mobile land or airborne                            generating repair reports. The high scan
                     vehicle. In these cases, the camera is                           speed and the long wave detector of the
                     mounted outside the vehicle and the                              infrared systems allow the technicians to
                     controller and display are used inside the                       travel at reasonable road speeds and, for
                     vehicle. Images can be stored on                                 some applications, to work day or night.
                     videotape or on disk for analysis after the
                     survey has been conducted. Longwave                                  Scanning powerlines and equipment
                     (8 to 12 µm) systems are typically                               over long distances can be expedited by
                     preferred for these applications because                         using a technique called thresholding.
                     they can be used during the day without                          Thresholding allows the instrument to
                     picking up false readings as a result of                         display an easily recognizable
                     reflections from the sun.                                        black-and-white image with the hottest
                                                                                      regions of the image colorized in red.
                         Northeast Utilities, Berlin, Connecticut,                    With this feature, operators can set a
                     pioneered a technique of mobile power                            threshold temperature; any objects
                     line scanning. They have developed                               exceeding this temperature will be readily
                     several customized vans incorporating                            noticed by the operator when red appears
                                                                                      in the display. Systems incorporating this
FIGURE 1. Absolute temperature measurements of loose                                  feature along with high speed scanning at
connection over six months: (a) thermograms; (b) graph.                               television rates increase the number of
Component should be repaired at point where curve rises                               miles that can be covered in a day with a
rapidly, that is, when temperature rises abruptly.                                    thermographic system.
(a)
                                                                                          Telescopes and electrooptical zoom
Temperature, K (°C) [°F](b)                              November  January     March  features are frequently required when
                                                                                      scanning small connections over long
                               333 (60) [140]                                         distances. It is important to understand
                               322 (49) [120]                                         the spatial resolution limitations of the
                               311 (38) [100]                                         instrument in use. Systems with high
                               300 (27) [80]                                          spatial resolution have the benefit of
                               289 (16) [60]                                          being able to view small objects at long
                               278 (4) [40]                                           distances.
                               266 (–7) [20]
                                                                                      Mechanical Systems and Rotating
                                              September                               Equipment Analysis
                                                               Month surveyed         There are numerous applications for
                                                                                      predictive maintenance with
                        Legend                                                        thermography on mechanical systems and
                              = temperature rise over ambient                         rotating equipment. These systems
                              = actual target temperature                             typically fail as a result of excessive
                                                                                      vibration or poor lubrication, resulting in
                                                                                      an increase in temperature.
                                                                                          Thermography is frequently used as a
                                                                                      screening tool for vibration equipment.
                                                                                      Electrical motors, pumps and solenoids
                                                                                      can be evaluated quickly for abnormal
                                                                                      conditions. These studies can also be
                                                                                      conducted over time to look for
                                                                                      temperature increase trends.
                                                                                          In electrical motors, thermography can
                                                                                      be used to detect deteriorating insulation,
                                                                                      poor windings and bad brushes. Many
                                                                                      electric motor rework facilities also use
                                                                                      thermography to evaluate motor armature
                                                                                      conditions. In this application, it is
                                                                                      helpful if the thermographic equipment
                                                                                      operates at a multiple of the motor speed,
                                                                                      that is, 60 Hz or 50 Hz, to accommodate
                                                                                      international applications. The motor can
                                                                                      be viewed easily while it is running
                                                                               Electric Power Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 529
because the system provides a strobe          Equipment Selection
                      effect, slowing the apparent rotation so it
                      can be analyzed.                              There is a wide range of thermographic
                                                                    equipment available on the market and it
                          As bearings lose lubrication, vibration   is important to find the best equipment
                      occurs and heat builds to the surface of      for each customer’s set of applications.
                      the object, where it can be detected with     Basically, a thermal imaging system
                      thermography. In Fig. 2, an air compressor    performs two primary functions: imaging
                      and motor are evaluated. As expected, the     and temperature measurement. It is
                      compressor head is warm as a result of the    important to evaluate carefully the quality
                      compression process. The center of the        of the thermal image. This includes
                      compressor pulley is also abnormally          factors such as spatial resolution, scan
                      warm, indicating a poorly lubricated or       speed and thermal sensitivity. The
                      failing bearing. The visible light and        temperature measurement capability
                      infrared images were both gathered            should be accurate and repeatable. It is
                      during the survey and subsequently            important that a system maintain its
                      transferred to an image processing system.    accuracy over a wide range of operating
                      In the image processor, the images are        conditions.
                      displayed side by side and a temperature
                      cursor is placed on the hot spot. A repair        The wavelength band that the
                      report can then be generated directly from    instrument operates in is an important
                      the image processor.                          consideration. Short wave instruments are
                                                                    more significantly influenced by humid
                  Fluid and Heat Transfer System                    air and reflections from the sun.
                  Analysis                                          Longwave systems are typically not
                                                                    affected by these factors and can provide
                      Thermography can also be used to              a higher resolution image.
                      evaluate fluid transfer systems such as
                      pumps, steam traps and underground                Instrument portability and ruggedness
                      steam lines. Heat transfer systems such as    are also considerations. Modular systems
                      heat exchangers, cooling towers and air       generally provide the most flexibility
                      conditioning systems can be inspected for     because they can be used in a wide variety
                      blockages and poor thermal distribution.      of configurations.
                          Insulated pipes can be assessed for heat      Data storage and image processing
                      loss or leakages. Plant buildings can be      capabilities are also important factors. It is
                      studied for insulation voids and roof leaks   best to have the option of both digital
                      with this type of equipment.                  and videotape storage and analysis. The
                                                                    image processing system should be able to
FIGURE 2. Compressor bearing overheating. Abnormal hot              handle visual and thermal images
spot on drive pulley indicates poor lubrication on sheave           simultaneously. An image archiving
bearing.                                                            database capability is useful for
                                                                    implementing a structured maintenance
                                                                    program.
                                                                        Other factors such as availability of
                                                                    accessories, training and rapid service
                                                                    should also be considered carefully when
                                                                    selecting a thermal imaging system.
530 Infrared and Thermal Testing
PART 2. Infrared Thermography in Electrical
Maintenance9
Thermography is one of the most               warm component seem cool when it is
powerful tools available for electrical       really quite warm.
maintenance. With professional training
and some experience a thermographer can           The solution is to be aware of the
quickly locate high resistance                thermal background when viewing shiny
connections, load imbalances and              surfaces.
overloads while the system is in
operation. This can all be accomplished       Shiny Surfaces
without direct contact to the energized
system.                                       A much more serious problem on shiny
                                              surfaces is that they simply give little
    Electrical inspections have typically     visible indication of their actual
produced remarkable returns, with             temperature. Polished aluminum, for
documented returns of 30 to 1 on the part     instance, emits so little energy that even
of a major industrial insurer. Prevention     at temperatures in excess of 373 K (100 °C
of catastrophic failures and unscheduled      = 212 °F) it may look like it is at ambient
outages often results in cost savings far in  temperature because of a 0.03 emissivity
excess of the cost of the test equipment      value.
and program.
                                                  When looking at shiny surfaces,
    Today’s economic climate, however,        remember that they will not appear as
demands even greater assurances for           warm (or cold) as they really are. It is not
reliability from maintenance                  possible to find hot spots on shiny
thermographers than in the past.              surfaces until the surfaces are very hot.
Experience can reveal the inspection
program’s successes and limitations.          Measurements on Low Emissivity
                                              Surfaces
    Some limitations to thermographic
tests of electrical equipment are quite       So little radiation is emitted by shiny
obvious. Some problems are inherent to        surfaces that trying to convert the
the laws of physics and must be lived         radiometric data into accurate
with or worked around. Others are related     temperature information is typically
to environmental or operating conditions.     impossible on a repeatable basis in the
The latest infrared test equipment is no      field. Many professionals do not
longer a limiting factor — it will do more    recommend measuring temperatures with
than usually needed. But inadequate data      emissivity values lower than about 0.5.
collection procedures and a poor
understanding of how to use the                   Although the emissivity value can be
information gathered are very much            set for less than 0.5 in most systems,
limiting factors. The following discussion    beware of the accuracy of measurement
indicates ways to improve electrical          using values that small.
inspections by dealing with these
limitations.                                  Emissivity Determination
Limitations from Physics                      Emissivity values can be taken from
                                              predetermined tables but such values
Reflected or Background                       should be used with a great deal of care.
Radiation                                     They are usually generic and may not be
                                              accurate for the waveband or temperature
The radiometer sees the combined              range under examination. They are also
radiosity (exitance) of both radiated and     each averaged over a waveband. If very
reflected energy. Only the emitted energy     accurate temperature data are needed,
indicates the temperature of the              calculate the emissivity value of the actual
component. The reflected energy can           surface being measured with the system.
make a shiny component appear hot
when it is not. Solar reflections are a           Whenever possible, measure
problem especially outside. Reflections of    temperatures only on highly emissive
cooler ambient backgrounds may make a         surfaces, such as electrical tape applied to
                                              the surface, using known, tested
                                              emissivity correction values. When this is
                                              not possible, measure the value of the
                                              surface.
Electric Power Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 531
To determine the emissivity value of a    be a significant difference in temperature
surface, follow the procedure                 between the heat source and the
recommended in the training manual or         measured surface.
the equipment operator manual. Note,
however, that these techniques will               Many factors influence the rate at
probably not be accurate for shiny            which the heat is transferred to the
surfaces. The best bet, whenever possible,    surface. For example, on a load break
is to measure temperatures only on            elbow, variations in the thickness of the
surfaces of high or known emissivity or to    electrical insulation alone, because it is
use contact measurement devices such as       also a fairly good thermal insulator, can
thermocouples.                                cause up to a ±11 K (11 °C = 20 °F)
                                              variation in surface temperature.
Angle of Interrogation
                                                  Test the component as close to the
Emissivity also changes with the angle of     heating source as possible. Where this is
viewing. For instance cylindrical surfaces,   not possible, actual problems will always
such as a tubular bus or the barrel of a      be more severe than are indicated.
cylindrical fuse, emit and reflect thermal
radiation over a wide range of values.            The effects of the materials acting as
What is seen is not necessarily a true        thermal insulation must also be
representation of the problem.                considered. The greater these effects are,
                                              the less indication there will be of the
    Always try to face the target directly.   actual temperature at the heat source.
Try to stay within 45 degrees of normal.
On curved surfaces make several               Environmental or
measurements, if necessary moving each        Generating Conditions
time to be directly in front of a small
section of the curve.                         Defining Delta Measurements
Emissivity Variations                         Delta temperatures are sometimes
                                              reported as a difference between the
Temperatures measured on components           component and the ambient temperature.
with several emissivities may be incorrect.   Yet the term ambience, which actually
Those parts with high emittance may           means surroundings, is typically not well
appear to have a different temperature        defined. Does it mean air temperature? Or
than parts with lower emittance. A piece      the temperature in an electrical panel? Is
of tape or a sticker on a shiny bus bar, for  the panel temperature measured
instance, will almost always appear           immediately on opening it or after a
warmer than the bus bar itself, which has     while? Inaccuracies can result if ambient is
a low emissivity is reflecting the normally   not clearly defined or understood.
cooler surroundings.
                                                  Delta measurements, when used,
    Be cautious when dealing with a           should be the temperature difference from
surface that has several different            one phase to another (if loads are equal)
emissivity values. While they may all be      or to a similar piece of equipment under
the same temperature, they will probably      the same influences.
not appear the same.
                                              Environmental Conditions
    Emissivity changes may not be
obvious. Cracks, scratches, bolt threads      Environmental conditions can make it
and holes will all typically have higher      difficult to see or correctly interpret
emissivities than the surfaces they are in    problems, that is, operational
and will appear to be at a different          dysfunctions caused by material
temperature. A hole is actually a good        anomalies. This is especially true for
place to measure an accurate temperature      problems with a low temperature
because it has a very high emissivity. A      difference. Despite what people may
hole that is seven times deeper than it is    think, these problems can be extremely
wide has an emissivity of 0.98.               dangerous.
Cases Where Surface Is Measured,                  A problem with a low temperature
Not Heat Source                               difference will tend to be hidden, masked
                                              or understated in the following
Failure of electrical components is usually   environmental cases: where components
related to excessive heat, especially that    are heated by the sun; in ambient
caused by high resistance. Heat is            extremes, either hot or cold; when
transferred from this internal source to      components are cooled by the wind or
the outer surface visible to the infrared     other convection; when surfaces are wet;
camera. For small electrical parts the        and when components are lightly loaded
source and the surface may be in very         thermally.
close proximity and of similar
temperatures. But in most cases there can         Low temperature problems may be
                                              hidden by the environment — do not
532 Infrared and Thermal Testing
assume they disappear. They will be back     (2) cost of preventive maintenance,
when conditions change.                      (3) criticality of equipment, (4) increases
                                             in electrical load, (5) changing trend of
    Whenever possible conduct surveys        temperatures, (6) history of the
under optimum conditions. Wet                equipment or similar equipment,
conditions, hot or sunny afternoons and      (7) availability of spare parts and repair
winds greater than 16 km·h–1 (10 mi·h–1)     personnel, (8) cost of an unscheduled
should be avoided. Be aware also that the    outage or run to failure, (9) ability to
wind will cool off the abnormal phase.       reduce loads until scheduled outage,
For a valid inspection, however, normal      (10) ability to monitor the condition of
phases just a few degrees above ambient      equipment, (11) accuracy of test
on inspected surfaces should not have        data, especially temperature, and
cooled below ambient. The stronger the       (12) availability of repair opportunity.
wind, the more misleading are
measurements of temperature differences.         These criteria can be incorporated into
                                             a weighted matrix that will suggest an
Inservice Inspection                         appropriate course of action. Compare the
                                             predictions with the actual results, to
Equipment must be under load, preferably     improve the matrix.
normal operating loads. The correction
factors based on the power formulas          Thermographer Qualification
commonly used in the industry are not
recommended. Although they will              Inaccurate results from infrared and
accurately predict the changing heat         thermal testing of electrical systems and
output, they will not predict the            components are often caused by a poorly
component temperature.                       qualified thermographer. Bad inspection
                                             practices, lack of information and
    Inspect equipment when load is either    misunderstanding of what the data really
40 percent of design10 or the highest        indicate are all factors. A thermographer
anticipated load — whichever is greater. If  qualified at Level I is not supposed to
loads are less than this, problems may       interpret data. That is a duty reserved for
exist that cannot be detected or that will   someone with Level II training and
give very little warning before failure.     experience.
Variations in Ambient                            Inspectors must get training,
Temperature                                  experience and support to do the job.
Thermal tests must also take into account
changes in ambient air temperature,
especially from summer to winter
extremes. A problem identified during
winter is more likely to fail during
summer conditions.
    Whenever possible, conduct tests under
worst case conditions. This usually means
at peak load during hot weather. If this is
not possible, interpret the results with
care.
Data Interpretation
Criteria for Assembling Data
The greatest mistakes during an infrared
inspection of an electrical circuit are
probably made in interpretation and
handling of the data after the inspection.
Temperature is not always the most
important datum required to understand
the problem.
    What other factors should be
considered when determining the
seriousness of a problem? This question is
probably best addressed by a group of
people involved in the various levels of
maintenance operations and management
at the work site. Factors to be considered
may include the following: (1) safety,
Electric Power Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 533
PART 3. Predictive Maintenance of Nuclear
Reactor Components
Nuclear reactors are composed of a           components of the Japan Materials
number of components to which many           Testing Reactor: (1) decay heat monitoring
nondestructive testing methods are           of an irradiated capsule, (2) monitoring of
applied for inspection during operation as   cooling towers under reactor operation,
well as shutdown. However, it is difficult   (3) detection of overheating of main
to apply most of the methods to              circulation pumps and (4) maintenance of
components where access is restricted        the reactor canal wall.12
because of the radioactive environment
where access by inspectors is restricted.    Decay Heat Monitoring of
The infrared and thermal test method is      Irradiated Capsule under
an efficient remote sensing device when      Operation
used to diagnose and inspect the reactor
components of nuclear reactors.              The Japan Materials Testing Reactor,
                                             whose thermal output is 50 MW, is used
    Infrared thermography has been widely    to irradiate test fuels and materials of a
applied to inspect components of nuclear     capsule inserted in the reactor core and
reactors — for example, (1) leakage and      reflector zone with the fast and thermal
overheating areas at joints, shaft and       neutron flux of 1 × 1014 to
bearings, (2) abnormal parts in piping,      4 × 1014 cm–2·s–1 and neutron fluence of
valve, flange and nozzle, (3) internal       1021 to 1022. The capsule tube is 30 to
discontinuities in the containment vessel    80 mm (1.2 to 3.2 in.) in diameter and
and piping such as corrosion, separation     750 mm (30 in.) in length. Fuels and
and cracks, (4) leakage of cooling fluid in  materials are placed in the tube for
reactor core and its components, (5)         irradiation. The reactor is operated for 28
deteriorated and anomalous areas in          days of each cycle. The volumetric heat
metallic and nonmetallic joints and          generation of the capsule in the reactor is
bushings in the highly radioactive           10 W·cm–3 (164 W·in.–3) maximum during
environment, (6) continuous monitoring       the operation. The reactor pressure vessel
of cooling towers under reactor operation    is submerged in an open water container.
(7) overheated areas of main circulation
pumps and (8) deterioration and                  The irradiated capsule is transferred
anomalies of electric and electronic         from the reactor core via an open water
control components.11                        canal of square cross section directly
    Described next are a few techniques for
detecting and evaluating the integrity of
FIGURE 3. Thermograms of water surface with irradiated capsule: (a) left; (b) right.
(a) (b)
534 Infrared and Thermal Testing
connected to the pool during the                  Continuous monitoring on the water
shutdown period and is stored under           surface of the canal using the infrared
water near the side of the canal wall. The    thermography is useful to monitor the
irradiated fuel and material in the capsule   decay heat behavior of the irradiated
generate the decaying gamma radiation         capsule. Thermographic data on the
heat. Some capsules emit gamma                temperature rise of the capsule make it
radiation. Radioactivity at the capsule       possible to determine the time to transfer
surface is so high after irradiation that     the irradiated capsule from the canal.
water is circulated in the canal to cool the
radiation generated heat for 1 to 3 mo.       Continuous Monitoring of
After the radioactivity of the capsule        Cooling Tower under
becomes lower than an allowable value,        Reactor Operation13
the capsule is transferred to the hot
laboratory building.                          A water cooling removes the heat
                                              generated in the nuclear reactor and
    A monitoring test is used during          transmits it to the air. The cooling tower
thermography to detect a small                consists of four cross flow and draft units
temperature rise of the water surface         that remove the thermal heat of 12.5 MW
caused by the decay heat from the             per unit. The flow rate of the water is
irradiated capsule.                           3900 m3·h–1.
    Figure 3 shows a thermal image of the         The cold ambient air supplied from the
water canal above the capsule after           bottom intake of the tower flows upward.
irradiation for four days. In general, the    The injected water droplets are cooled by
emissivity of the water surface at nearly     evaporation and flow down to the bottom
ambient temperature approaches unity          of the pool. Hot water at about 315 K
and the radiation temperature of the          (42 °C = 108 °F) in inlet is flashed from
water measured by thermography                the upper nozzle and transfers its heat to
becomes equal to the real temperature of      the cold air. The outlet temperature of the
the surface.                                  water becomes 306 K (33 °C = 91 °F) as
                                              the evaporation of the water droplets heat
    The thermal image of the water surface    the air. As fine water droplets cover the
in the canal becomes uniform before the       wooden cooling panel, the measured
transfer operation. However, thermal          radiation temperature of the outer wall of
images of the canal water near the            the tower becomes equal to the real
irradiated capsule show that the surface      temperature.
temperature of the water above the
irradiated capsule becomes nonuniform             Figure 4 shows thermograms, or
and exceeds water temperature without         thermal images, of the cooling tower
the capsule (Fig. 3). A temperature rise of   units. Three cooling units (the first, third
+0.1 K (0.1 °C = 0.18 °F) observed on the     and fourth from the left) are in operation
water surface above the capsule indicates     and the second unit from the left in
the warming of the water because of           suspension to control the removable
radiation decay heating of the irradiated     power. The surface radiation temperatures
capsule. The decayed heat becomes
negligibly smaller than that generated just
after the irradiation.
FIGURE 4. Cooling towers under reactor operation: (a) left, units 1 and 2; (b) right, units 3
and 4.
(a) (b)
Electric Power Applications of Infrared and Thermal Testing 535