Angela Latham-2017 Annual Faculty Review

ANNUAL FACULTY REVIEW

Angel La a

2017

I structi na S ms n W fo ce D velo ent

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

OFFICE: IED Bldg. Room 260
EMAIL: [email protected]

PHONE: 662.325.9260

V tae

VISION___________________________________________________________________________________

Award-winning ceramicist with six years’ experience, including nineteen years of successful design
entrepreneurial skills which can be utilized to expand the knowledge of the next generation.

EDUCATION______________________________________________________________________________
Graduate:

Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, May 2011
Master of Science in Architecture G.P.A 3.84

Undergraduate:

Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, May 2013
Bachelor of Fine Arts in Graphic Design G.P.A 3.77

Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, May 2007
Council for Interior Design Accreditation (formerly FIDER)
Bachelor of Science in Interior Design, Graduated Magna Cum Laude G.P.A 3.78

East Mississippi Community College, Mayhew, MS, July 2004 G.P.A. 3.66

TECHNICAL SKILLS________________________________________________________________________

Computer and Software Technologies: Woodworking and Sculpture Tools:

Microsoft Office Suite Table saw
Adobe Creative Cloud Jig saw
Microstation Band saw
Right Hemisphere Planer
SmartTeam Drills
Adobe Acrobat Pro DC Routers
Autodesk Revit 2018 Sanders
XHTML/CSS
AutoCAD 2007
Camtasia Studio 8

Ceramic Tools: Photography

Kiln Canon
Pottery Wheel Digital Capture
Slab Roller
Pug Mill
Extruder

166 Tyler Road • Starkville, MS 39759 • 662.425.2112
www.angelalathamdesigns.com

EXPERIENCE______________________________________________________________________________

Internships:

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Savannah, GA 2013 – 2013

Technical Illustrator Intern

Provided support to the Technical Publications Department through thoughtful design ideas.

Redesigned Binders and Spines for Publications.

Complete Requests For Illustrations

Participated in everyday illustration workflows; keyed in 3D for Live Content and Review,

created animations for the G650 in AMM, Aircraft Maintenance Manual, and IPC, Illustrated

Parts Catalog.

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Savannah, GA 2012 – 2012

Technical Illustrator Intern

Provided support to the Technical Publications Department through thoughtful design ideas.

Redesigned PlaneBook Splashpages

Created Thumbnail Library for G280 and G650.

Participated in everyday illustration workflows; keyed in 3D for Live Content and Review,

created animations for the G650 in AMM, Aircraft Maintenance Manual, and IPC, Illustrated

Parts Catalog.

TVS Design, Atlanta, GA 2007 - 2007

Intern Interior Designer

Served clients through thoughtful design solutions and the creation of enlightened concepts, with a

sensible approach resulting in aesthetically pleasing interior spaces.

Worked on programming, space planning, furniture layouts, information gathering and

research as well as selection of finishes, furniture, and equipment, generating functionality and

safety.

Developed drawing and sketching design concepts and details through hand techniques

and CADD development, providing an outcome of quick concept ideas to detail oriented

illustrations.

Professional Experience:

Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 2013 – Current

Instructor, Department of Instructional Systems and Workforce Development

Taught the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts as well as Honors History and Appreciation of the

Art-Crafts.

Motivated students utilizing interactive learning techniques through lecture, demonstration,
visuals and assigned research
Develop in students an understanding and appreciation of the historical impact of art-crafts
on various civilizations as well as the growth and development of the art-crafts through the
ages by way of instructional applications, practical designs, and hands-on activities
including projects in ceramics, multi-media, and stained glass mosaics.
Educated students on how to express a sense of personal identity and self-esteem through
practical achievement in the expressive, communicative and functional modes of art, craft,
and design.

166 Tyler Road • Starkville, MS 39759 • 662.425.2112
www.angelalathamdesigns.com

Instilled in students the aesthetic sensibilities and powers of critical appraisal, appreciation
and evaluation.
Created in students the design qualities of imagination, creativity, originality and ingenuity.
Initiated honor students to research an assigned artist to pursue an oral presentation as well
as a research paper in order to impart in students the developed art form from a variety of
aspects.

Angela Latham Designs, Starkville, MS 2012 – Current

Freelance Graphic Designer

Operation of a freelance design company that provides branding and identity, print and web design for a

variety of clients.

Create design solutions that have a high visual impact.

Design concept to execution and presentation of different graphic applications to include

business identity, advertising, product packaging, magazines, books and website design.

Create budget costs and deadlines to meet the client’s needs.

Charity Mission/Fairview FGBC, Crawford, MS 2012 – 2017

Director of Marketing and Design

Provided stable branding and marketing for the church in order to maintain a steady identity.

Produce creative design solutions and ideas in the spirit of excellence, through visual

communication.

Instruct upcoming designers in industry-standard design software including Photoshop,

Illustrator, and InDesign.

Oversee a staff of designers and editors to complete tasks in an effective and timely

manner.

The Glory Magazine, Crawford, MS 2010 - 2012

Graphic Designer

Generate a quality induced, clear and concise magazine for the masses.

Mocking up design ideas and magazine layout

Adjusting designs to fit the need of articles and adds

Use Software to execute the designs for the magazine

Project schedules and meeting deadlines.

Working with others, such as editors, photographers, and printers in order to complete the

final product.

Assessment & Testing Services, Mississippi State University, MS State, MS. 2009 - 2011

Graduate Assistant

Provide customer service to examinees and maintain a conducive testing environment.

Welcome guests upon arrival and answer the telephone

Supply office organizational needs

Support staff and assist in the monthly scheduling of staff, scheduled and proctored exams.

Provide advertising and Outreach Events.

Design concepts, execution and presentation of different graphic applications.

166 Tyler Road • Starkville, MS 39759 • 662.425.2112
www.angelalathamdesigns.com

TVS Design, Atlanta, GA 2007 - 2009

Intern Interior Designer

Served clients through thoughtful design solutions and the creation of enlightened concepts, with a

sensible approach resulting in aesthetically pleasing interior spaces.

Worked on programming, space planning, furniture layouts, information gathering and

research as well as selection of finishes, furniture, and equipment, generating functionality and

safety.

Developed renderings through Photoshop and created presentation boards to include plans

and FF&E for presentations to the client giving them a more precise view of the concept.

Developed furniture schedules in InDesign and Excel, as well as furniture specifications in

order to acquire a detailed description for the clients view and a more organized project plan.

Developed drawing and sketching design concepts and details through hand techniques

and CADD development, providing an outcome of quick concept ideas to detail oriented

illustrations.

Created floor plans, ceiling plans, furniture plans, electrical and communication plans,

sections and elevations, as well as perspectives all used for executing construction documents.

Administered accurate punch lists, which consequently led to satisfactory results for the

client.

Developed project budget, using Microsoft Excel, producing an agreeable outcome.

Worked with vendors to acquire information, products, and samples, causing a respectful

rapport for future.

Hair Affair Beauty Salon, Columbus, MS. 1998 - 2007

Hair Designer – Owner/Self-employed Operator

Launched and maintained hair salon, managed the financial systems, provided daily operations of

business.

Managed independent operators causing a profitable effect for the business.

Sustained stock inventory producing efficient workflow.

Provided customer service to clients including professional hair care and products resulting in

repeat business.

Designed interior space to be a thriving work environment and relaxed atmosphere.

GROUP EXHIBITION_______________________________________________________________________

Graphic Design Exhibition, Mississippi State University, MS 2013

AWARDS_________________________________________________________________________________

South Central Chapter ASID Student Design Competition: 2006

1st runner-up in Rendering Category,
Honorable Mention in Residential Category

MSU Interior Design Competition: 2006

1st Place in Creative Design Category,
Honorable Mention in Residential Design Category

Chairish the Future – Judged by Vern Yip (TVS Design-Group project): 2009

“Best We Just Like It Award”

166 Tyler Road • Starkville, MS 39759 • 662.425.2112
www.angelalathamdesigns.com

MSU 40th Annual Competition: 2012
2013
Most Outstanding Junior,
Chair Lydia Thompson Purchase Award,
Student Affairs Purchase Award

MSU 41st Annual Competition:

Honorable Mention-Fine Art,
Bill Dunlap Purchase Award

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS_________________________________________________________

Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, Member 2011 – Current
AIGA- American Institute of Graphic Arts, Member 2012 – Current
NAEA-National Art Education Association, Member 2014 – Current

GRANTS_____________________________________________________________________________

2015
Latham, A, PI. MSU E-Center Startup Grant Funded by the Thad Cochran Endowment for

Entrepreneurship (TCEE), Key Capital Expenditure. $2,000 award.
Common Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology, a grant funded by Mississippi

2015
Latham, A, Co-PI. No Child Left Behind Grant-Integrating Global Academic Essentials:

Common Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology, a grant funded by Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $90,000 award. S. J. Lee, Co-PI, K. Huang, Co-PI, J.
Beriswill, Co-PI, K. Sherman-Morris, Co-PI, and P. Bracey, PI.

2016
Latham, A, Co-PI. No Child Left Behind Grant-Integrating Global Academic Essentials:

Common Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology, a grant funded by Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $90,000 award. S. J. Lee, Co-PI, K. Huang, Co-PI, J.
Beriswill, Co-PI, K. Sherman-Morris, Co-PI, and P. Bracey, PI.

2017
Latham, A, Co-PI. No Child Left Behind Grant-Integrating Global Academic Essentials:

Common Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology, a grant funded by Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $90,000 award. S. J. Lee, Co-PI, K. Huang, Co-PI, J.
Beriswill, Co-PI, K. Sherman-Morris, Co-PI, and P. Bracey, PI.

166 Tyler Road • Starkville, MS 39759 • 662.425.2112
www.angelalathamdesigns.com

REFERENCES_________________________________________________________________________

Mary Vaughn
Associ. Dir. Of Assessment & Testing
Computer Based Testing
180 Magruder Street
Mississippi State, MS. 39762
[email protected]
Office - 662-325-6610
Victor Wilbon
475 Will Hairston Road
Crawford, MS 39743
[email protected]
Cell – 662-251-8626
Dr. Pamela Bracey
224 Fieldstone Lane
Madison, MS. 39110
Cell – 662-528-0337

166 Tyler Road • Starkville, MS 39759 • 662.425.2112
www.angelalathamdesigns.com

AFRnecvuiueltay

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
ANNUAL FACULTY REVIEW

(Format and Instruction, revised 8/2011)

For the Period January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017

Name: Angela Latham Title and Rank: Instructor

Department/Unit: Inst. Sys. and Workforce Dev. School/College/Division: College of Education

The annual review will consist of a combination of the assessment of how well the faculty
member met the annual goals for the review period and an assessment of the overall
accomplishments of the faculty member. The faculty member must first complete Item I, Parts
A-D and Item II, Goals and Objectives. The supervisor must then complete Item III, Parts A-D
and Item IV, Parts 1-2. Copies of the Review are to be filed in the office of the head/supervisor
and the dean or director. Item IV, Overall Assessments, must be reported to the appropriate
Vice President. The confidentiality of these papers must be maintained by all parties involved.
(See Faculty Handbook)

I. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES

(To be prepared by faculty member)

A. Teaching (See Faculty Handbook)

1. Evidence of quality of instruction (check items submitted)
The faculty member is expected to provide material describing his/her teaching
activities and documentation supporting effectiveness. This material could include
any of the following, or any other items deemed appropriate (check those included):
student evaluations ✓ , measures of student success ✓ , peer reviews ____,
department head review _____, recognition of outstanding teaching ,
developmental activities ✓ , self-evaluation of each course taught ✓ ,
instructional materials used: course outlines ✓ , test materials ✓ ,
other-rubrics ✓ .

Semester Course Delivery Evaluation
Method Score
Spring 2017 TKI 2413-01: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.5
Spring 2017 TKI 2413-02: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.7
Spring 2017 TKI 2413-03: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.6
Spring 2017 TKI 2413-H04: Honors History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.4

Spring Overall Average: 4.55

Summer 2017 TKI 2413-02: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face N/A
Summer 2017 TKI 2413-51: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face N/A

Summer Overall Average: N/A

Fall 2017 TKI 2413-01: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.6
Fall 2017 TKI 2413-02: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.5
Fall 2017 TKI 2413-03: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.6
Fall 2017 TKI 2413-H04: Honors History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.9
Fall 2017 CO 3403-04 Photographic Communication Face to Face 3.2

Fall Overall Average: 4.36

I taught three sections of the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts
and one section of Honors History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts in the
Spring and the Fall. I taught two sections of the History and Appreciation
of the Art-Crafts in the second five week session of the summer. I also
taught a section of Photographic Communication. I received an overall
average student evaluation score of 4.55 in the Spring and 4.36 in the Fall.
All Items checked above are attached.

2. Academic Advisement
Undergraduate Advisees: _____ (number of students)
Master’s students: major professor ___; minor professor ___; comm. member ____
Specialist students: major professor ___; minor professor ___; comm. member ___
Doctoral students: major professor ___; minor professor ___; comm. member ____
Other:
Brief description of responsibilities:

I am not advising any students at this time.

3. Courses initiated/innovations instituted/other teaching contributions
(include new courses initiated, special lectures in other courses, generation of
teaching aids, activities supportive of teaching, student achievements, other)

I honor the students through an awards exhibition at the end of the Spring
and Fall semesters that showcases some of the best works from the
students in all of the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts sections,
which is called “The Non-Artist Exhibition/Awards Ceremony.” Students are
awarded certificates that commend them on their hard work and
dedication in the class, demonstrating the knowledge that has been
imparted through the skills learned. The awards are based off of people
who impacted the Arts and Crafts Movement Era as well as a Mississippi
Artist of the Ocean Springs area. Those awards include The William Morris
Award (Most Outstanding Artist), The Frank Lloyd Wright Award (The Most
Creative Artist), The Gustav Stickley Award (The Best Multi-Media Project),
The Newcomb Pottery Award (The Best Ceramic Art), The Walter Inglis
Anderson Award (The Best Stained Glass Mosaic), and The Best of Show
Award (The Viewer’s Choice), which is chosen by the spectators that visit
the show, and the newly chosen award is The John Ruskin Award (The Best
Video) which is awarded to student’s from the Honors section. I also
create a PowerPoint Presentation into the Non-Artist Exhibition which
allows the viewers to witness what projects were worthy of awards and
why they were chosen.

I integrated technology into the course for my honors students by
imparting in them the knowledge of two different software applications,
Camtaisia 8 and Adobe Spark. Adobe Spark is one of the newer Adobe
applications and is taught through a hands on method, while the
Camtaisia 8 application is taught through directional materials created.
These applications allow them to tell a digital story or make a video about
their journey through the semester with their artist. The students choose an
artist of the Arts and Crafts Movement Era and they pay homage to that
artist through all of their works for the semester. They then create a digital
story based on all of those created works as well as incorporating that
artist into the video. This new project allowed me the opportunity to
introduce a new award for my honors students, The John Ruskin Award
(The Best Artist Video).

I chose to hand make trophies to contribute to the The William Morris
Award (Most Outstanding Artist). These handmade trophies are made
with fused glass. Mr. Mize assisted in making the bases which were a two
tiered wooden structure.

Images of exhibition and awards are attached.

4. Other (including professional development and international activities)

Professional Development Date

Wrote a Recommendation Letter for Xeneia Sorrell January 5, 2017
Hosted the Spring 2017 Dinner Etiquette March 7, 2017
Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness March 23, 2017
SHARP Training April, 2017
Instructed GAETI Participants on Weebly June 9, 2017
Wrote a Recommendation Letter for Madison Monroe June 12, 2017
Implemented the Border Crossing Project at GAETI June 12-26, 2017
Instructed GAETI Participants on “Building Your Brand as an June 22, 2017
Educator”
Instructed GAETI Participants on “ Ways to Supplement Your June 23, 2017
Income as an Educator”
Instructed GAETI Participants on “Exploration of a Business Plan to June 28, 2017
Supplement Your Income as an Educator”
Instructed GAETI Participants on “Creating a Business Plan to June 28, 2017
Supplement Your Income as an Educator”
Canvas LMS Presentation August 25,2017
Diversifying Your Curriculum September 13, 2017
Served as Instructor of Snap It! for the Digital Dawg Byte October 26, 2017
Competition
What I Wish You Knew-Student Panel Session November 9, 2017
Supporting Diverse Faculty November 15, 2017

Information attached

B. Research/creative activities (See Faculty Handbook)

1. Publications, performances or creative activities (note stage of development):
(For books, indicate date of publication and publisher; for articles, indicate refereed
journals; for art shows, indicate judged competition; for musical shows, attach
copies of programs; for reports, indicate those done for in-house use.)

2. Professional papers read; indicate whether invited, refereed, or volunteered.
Cite organization, date, and title:

3. Grants for research or study; submitted or awarded (cite source, title of project, role
[PI, etc.], $ amount, dates):

Latham, A, Co-PI. No Child Left Behind Grant-Integrating Global Academic Essentials:
Common Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology, a grant funded by Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $100,000 award. S. J. Lee, Co-PI, K. Huang, Co-PI, J.
Beriswill, Co-PI, K. Sherman-Morris, Co-PI, and P. Bracey, PI.

4. Intellectual property developed (patents, copyrights, licenses):
5. Other (including professional development and international activities):

Professional Development Date

Writing a Grant: Frequently Asked Questions February 16, 2017

2017 Minority Faculty Staff Spring Social March 8, 2017

Women’s History Month/Painting with a Colleague March 21, 2017

Served as Assistant Director of GAETI June 5-30, 2017

2017 Minority Faculty, Staff, & Student Mixer August 22, 2017
2017 Minority Faculty and Staff Fall Social September 20, 2017
Completed Certification for Code.org September 30, 2017

Images are attached.

C. Service (See Faculty Handbook)
1. Public service, as lectures, short courses, workshops (dates, organizations and places):
(Off campus/on campus/extension projects)

Served for the year of 2017 as Director of Marketing and Design for Charity
Mission/Fairview Full Gospel Baptist Church.
2. Professional association service (offices held, journals edited, etc.):
(Indicate only associations in which you performed tasks)
3. University service (committees, administrative accomplishments, etc.):

ISWD Undergraduate Handbook Committee.
ISWD Appeals Committee.

4. School/departmental service/committees, etc.:

Service Date

Served as Supervisor for a student intern: February 2017 – April 2017
Kimberly McLeod June 4, 2017
Created Graphic Design Elements for GAETI 2017
To include: Logo Revision, Web Banners, Binder Inserts October 26, 2017
and Flyer Design.
Created T-Shirt Design for Digital Dawg Byte Competition.

Images are attached.
5. Other (including professional development and international activities):

D. Relevant activities and accomplishments not reported elsewhere (Cite title, organization,
and brief description)

1. Awards and distinctions:

2. Memberships in learned and professional societies:

Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, Member
American Institute of Graphic Arts, Member
The National Art Education Association, member

3. Consulting activities:

Consult businesses through Angela Latham Designs as a Freelance
Graphic Designer about the branding and identity of their company.

4. Other:

II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

(To be prepared by faculty member)

Please list specific goals and objectives including areas in which improvement will be sought in the next
calendar year. These will be evaluated in the next review cycle.

1. Create an environment conducive to successful creativity in the classroom.
2. Host Exhibition/Awards Ceremony at the end of the Spring and Fall semesters to

honor students for their hard work.
3. Introduce a new project that involves glass molding.
4. Present at professional development conferences.
5. Design and create a variety of marketing tools for departmental enhancement

and visual communication.
6. Write successful proposals to gain funding for class projects.

On an annual basis, each faculty member and each head/supervisor will agree in writing to the faculty
member’s goals, objectives, responsibilities and expectations.

Agreement: ______________________________________________
Faculty Member
_______________________________________________
Head/Supervisor

III. EVALUATION BY HEAD/SUPERVISOR, DEAN OR DIRECTOR

The annual performance review is based upon the agreement concerning goals and objectives,
responsibilities, expectations, and achievements of the faculty. A faculty member would normally be
expected to have an assignment in teaching, research and service. Indicate assignments below:
A. Assignment: Teaching: ______%; Research: ______%; Service: ______% = 100%.

(for review period, see p. 1)
B. Goals and Objectives: Narrative assessment of how the faculty member performed in achieving

the previous year’s goals and objectives. State whether the faculty member’s achievements were
Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Excellent, or Superior per the rating standard
below. (Attach listing of goals from the previous year’s review.)
C. Accomplishments: Narrative assessment of how the faculty member performed in achieving the
previous year’s accomplishments. Rate the performance of the faculty member in each category
listed and state whether the faculty member’s achievements were Unsatisfactory, Needs
Improvement, Satisfactory, Excellent, or Superior per the rating standard below.

(I) a. Teaching (Undergraduate):
b. Teaching (Graduate):
c. Advising:

(II) Research/creative activities:
(III) Service (on campus/off campus):
D. Progress: If the faculty member is an assistant or associate professor, there must be a statement
about his or her progress toward tenure and/or promotion.

Unsatisfactory: Quality and quantity of work totally unsatisfactory. Immediate corrective action is
imperative.
Needs Improvement: Work is unsatisfactory in quantity and quality. Individual is not performing at
an adequate level. Corrective action required.
Satisfactory: Individual performing at "satisfactory" level. Tasks and goals are being accomplished
in a timely and competent manner.
Excellent: Quality and quantity of work consistently meritorious; goals regularly exceeded, highly
productive; individual recognized beyond the unit.
Superior: Preeminent distinction resulting from consistent outstanding meritorious
accomplishments.
N/A: Not Applicable

IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF PAST PERFORMANCE/
GOALS/OBJECTIVES/RESPONSIBILITIES/EXPECTATIONS

(See Faculty Handbook)

1. Overall Rating by Head/Supervisor, Dean or Director: Rate the overall performance and
achievement of the faculty member as Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Excellent, or
Superior per the rating standard listed in Item III.

2. Written Comments by Head/Supervisor, Dean or Director
To be completed following the annual review meeting with the faculty member, but made available
to the faculty member for review before signing by both parties. (Include specific strengths, needs
for improvement, responsibilities, and expectations for next year. Summary of progress toward
tenure and/or promotion, if applicable, will also be indicated here.)

THE SIGNATURES LISTED BELOW* MUST BE OBTAINED

*Faculty Member:
I have met with the head/supervisor and acknowledge discussion of this appraisal.

_______________________________________________ ________________________
Faculty Member Signature Date

I agree with the annual review. See addenda [ ]
Faculty Signature: _______________________________________________

I disagree with the annual review. See addenda [ ]
Faculty Signature: _______________________________________________ ________________________
Comments Attached: Date
Additional Information:
_______________________________________________
Faculty Member Signature

Appeal Requested: ________________________
_______________________________________________ Date
Faculty Member Signature

*Head/Supervisor: ________________________
_______________________________________________ Date
Signature

*Director or Dean: ________________________
_______________________________________________ Date
Signature

The faculty member will be provided with a copy of the final review, including all signatures and
comments/recommendations/assessments. The faculty member reserves the right to respond to
any comments and to have all of those responses included in the final version of the Faculty
Annual Review/Evaluation.
If disagreement is indicated, the faculty member must state the objection on the following page,
otherwise the page should be left blank. The disagreement statement should be completed before
the Dean signs above.

Disagreement Statement: To be completed by the faculty member if applicable.
If the faculty member disagrees with the evaluation of the head/supervisor, an explanation
of the disagreement should be detailed below by the faculty member. This page should be left blank
if there is agreement with the head/supervisors assessment.

Teaching

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP17

TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 21

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.5
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.7
Global Index
av.=4.5
1. 1 dev.=0.7

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 4.8% 0% 38.1% 57.1% n=21
av.=4.5
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=21
4.8% 0% 4.8% 47.6% 42.9% av.=4.2
dev.=0.9
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=21
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.7
0% 0% 0% 28.6% 71.4% dev.=0.5

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=21
av.=4.9
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.4
0% 0% 0% 14.3% 85.7%
n=21
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.1
dev.=0.7
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 14.3% 57.1% 28.6% n=21
av.=4.2
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.9

12345 n=21
4.8% 0% 4.8% 47.6% 42.9% av.=4.1
dev.=0.9
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=13
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345 av.=4.5
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 4.8% 14.3% 42.9% 38.1% dev.=0.7
ab.=8
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
Page 1
12345
0% 0% 7.7% 38.5% 53.8%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 8.3% 33.3% 58.3% n=12
av.=4.5
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
Strongly Disagree ab.=9
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 0% 0% 40% 60% n=20
av.=4.6
Strongly Agree dev.=0.5
ab.=1

12345

0% 0% 0% 23.8% 76.2% n=21
av.=4.8
Strongly Agree dev.=0.4

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Profile Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev n=21 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Angela Latham n=21 av.=4.2 md=4.0 dev.=0.9
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts n=21 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=21 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Name of the course: n=21 av.=4.1 md=4.0 dev.=0.7
(Name of the survey) n=21 av.=4.2 md=4.0 dev.=0.9
n=21 av.=4.1 md=4.0 dev.=0.9
Values used in the profile line: Mean n=13 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
n=12 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
1. 1 n=20 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=21 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev Profile
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts +

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - av.=4.5 dev.=0.7

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP17

TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 21

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.7
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.5
Global Index
av.=4.7
1. 1 dev.=0.5

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 38.1% 61.9% n=21
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=21
0% 0% 0% 33.3% 66.7% av.=4.7
dev.=0.5
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=21
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.7
0% 0% 0% 28.6% 71.4% dev.=0.5

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=21
av.=4.8
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.4
0% 0% 0% 23.8% 76.2%
n=19
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.6
dev.=0.5
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 ab.=2
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 0% 36.8% 63.2%
n=21
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.6
dev.=0.5
12345
0% 0% 0% 42.9% 57.1% n=20
av.=4.7
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5
ab.=1
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% n=19
av.=4.6
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6
ab.=2
12345
0% 0% 5.3% 26.3% 68.4% Page 1

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 11.1% 22.2% 66.7% n=18
av.=4.6
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
Strongly Disagree ab.=3
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 0% 0% 33.3% 66.7% n=21
av.=4.7
Strongly Agree dev.=0.5

12345 n=21
0% 0% 0% 28.6% 71.4% av.=4.7
dev.=0.5
Strongly Agree

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Profile Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev n=21 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Angela Latham n=21 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts n=21 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=21 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Name of the course: n=19 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
(Name of the survey) n=21 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=20 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Values used in the profile line: Mean n=19 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
1. 1 n=21 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=21 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev Profile
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts +

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - av.=4.7 dev.=0.5

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP17

TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 20

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.6
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.6
Global Index
av.=4.6
1. 1 dev.=0.6

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 5% 10% 85% n=20
av.=4.8
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=20
0% 0% 5% 20% 75% av.=4.7
dev.=0.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=20
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.6
0% 0% 10% 20% 70% dev.=0.7

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=20
av.=4.8
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.4
0% 0% 0% 20% 80%
n=19
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.4
dev.=0.8
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 ab.=1
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 21.1% 21.1% 57.9%
n=19
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.4
dev.=0.8
12345
0% 0% 21.1% 15.8% 63.2% n=19
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
ab.=1
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 10.5% 21.1% 68.4% n=15
av.=4.4
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.8
ab.=5
12345
0% 0% 20% 20% 60% Page 1

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 6.7% 40% 53.3% n=15
av.=4.5
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6
Strongly Disagree ab.=5
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 0% 0% 45% 55% n=20
av.=4.6
Strongly Agree dev.=0.5

12345 n=20
0% 0% 0% 35% 65% av.=4.7
dev.=0.5
Strongly Agree

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Profile Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev n=20 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Angela Latham n=20 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts n=20 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
n=20 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Name of the course: n=19 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
(Name of the survey) n=19 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
n=19 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Values used in the profile line: Mean n=15 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
n=15 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
1. 1 n=20 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=20 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev Profile
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts +

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - av.=4.6 dev.=0.6

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP17

TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 16

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.4
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.8
Global Index
av.=4.4
1. 1 dev.=0.8

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 6.3% 25% 68.8% n=16
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=16
0% 6.3% 25% 18.8% 50% av.=4.1
dev.=1
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=16
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.5
0% 0% 6.3% 37.5% 56.3% dev.=0.6

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=16
av.=5
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0
0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
n=15
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.4
dev.=0.9
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 ab.=1
questions or concerns. 0% 6.7% 6.7% 26.7% 60%
n=16
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=3.9
dev.=1.2
12345
6.3% 0% 37.5% 12.5% 43.8% n=15
av.=4.2
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=1
ab.=1
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 6.7% 20% 20% 53.3% n=13
av.=4.3
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.9
ab.=3
12345
0% 7.7% 7.7% 30.8% 53.8% Page 1

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 16.7% 25% 58.3% n=12
av.=4.4
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.8
Strongly Disagree ab.=4
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 6.7% 20% 20% 53.3% n=15
av.=4.2
Strongly Agree dev.=1
ab.=1

12345

0% 0% 12.5% 25% 62.5% n=16
av.=4.5
Strongly Agree dev.=0.7

12345

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
class. Disagree Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.1 md=4.5 dev.=1.0
Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree n=16 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
Strongly Agree n=16 av.=3.9 md=4.0 dev.=1.2
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.2 md=5.0 dev.=1.0
Disagree Strongly Agree n=13 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree n=12 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.2 md=5.0 dev.=1.0
Disagree Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Profile

Name of the instructor: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - + av.=4.4 dev.=0.8

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

05/30/2017 Class Climate evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
FA17

TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 22

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.6
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.7
Global Index
av.=4.6
1. 1 dev.=0.7

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 4.5% 18.2% 77.3% n=22
av.=4.7
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=22
0% 0% 13.6% 31.8% 54.5% av.=4.4
dev.=0.7
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=22
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.8
0% 0% 4.5% 9.1% 86.4% dev.=0.5

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=22
av.=5
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.2
0% 0% 0% 4.5% 95.5%
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.7
dev.=0.6
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 ab.=4
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 5.6% 16.7% 77.8%
n=22
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.3
dev.=0.9
12345
0% 4.5% 13.6% 27.3% 54.5% n=18
av.=4.4
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.9
ab.=4
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 5.6% 11.1% 22.2% 61.1% n=11
av.=4.5
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.8
ab.=11
12345
0% 0% 18.2% 9.1% 72.7% Page 1

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 9.1% 18.2% 72.7% n=11
av.=4.6
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
Strongly Disagree ab.=11
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

5.6% 0% 16.7% 27.8% 50% n=18
av.=4.2
Strongly Agree dev.=1.1
ab.=4

12345

0% 0% 0% 22.7% 77.3% n=22
av.=4.8
Strongly Agree dev.=0.4

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Profile Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev n=22 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Angela Latham n=22 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts n=22 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=22 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.2
Name of the course: n=18 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
(Name of the survey) n=22 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
n=18 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
Values used in the profile line: Mean n=11 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
n=11 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
1. 1 n=18 av.=4.2 md=4.5 dev.=1.1
n=22 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev Profile
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts +

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - av.=4.6 dev.=0.7

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
FA17

TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 23

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.5
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.6
Global Index
av.=4.5
1. 1 dev.=0.6

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 39.1% 60.9% n=23
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=23
0% 4.3% 8.7% 21.7% 65.2% av.=4.5
dev.=0.8
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=23
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.9
0% 0% 0% 8.7% 91.3% dev.=0.3

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=23
av.=5
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0
0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
n=20
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.3
dev.=0.8
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 ab.=3
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 20% 30% 50%
n=23
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.3
dev.=0.8
12345
0% 4.3% 8.7% 39.1% 47.8% n=22
av.=4.5
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
ab.=1
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 9.1% 31.8% 59.1% n=11
av.=4.5
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5
ab.=12
12345
0% 0% 0% 45.5% 54.5% Page 1

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% n=12
av.=4.5
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5
Strongly Disagree ab.=11
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 5.3% 15.8% 47.4% 31.6% n=19
av.=4.1
Strongly Agree dev.=0.8
ab.=4

12345

0% 4.3% 4.3% 17.4% 73.9% n=23
av.=4.6
Strongly Agree dev.=0.8

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 2