Angela Latham-2017 Annual Faculty Review

Profile Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev n=23 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Angela Latham n=23 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts n=23 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.3
n=23 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
Name of the course: n=20 av.=4.3 md=4.5 dev.=0.8
(Name of the survey) n=23 av.=4.3 md=4.0 dev.=0.8
n=22 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Values used in the profile line: Mean n=11 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=12 av.=4.5 md=4.5 dev.=0.5
1. 1 n=19 av.=4.1 md=4.0 dev.=0.8
n=23 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev Profile
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts +

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - av.=4.5 dev.=0.6

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
FA17

TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 19

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.6
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.6
Global Index
av.=4.6
1. 1 dev.=0.6

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 21.1% 78.9% n=19
av.=4.8
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.4

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=19
0% 0% 10.5% 21.1% 68.4% av.=4.6
dev.=0.7
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=19
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=4.8
0% 0% 5.3% 10.5% 84.2% dev.=0.5

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=18
av.=4.9
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.2
0% 0% 0% 5.6% 94.4%
n=16
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.3
dev.=0.9
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 ab.=3
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 25% 18.8% 56.3%
n=19
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.5
dev.=0.6
12345
0% 0% 5.3% 36.8% 57.9% n=18
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.8

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345 n=9
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 5.6% 0% 27.8% 66.7% av.=4.4
dev.=0.7
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree ab.=10

12345 Page 1
0% 0% 11.1% 33.3% 55.6%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 12.5% 25% 62.5% n=8
av.=4.5
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.8
Strongly Disagree ab.=11
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 0% 38.5% 23.1% 38.5% n=13
av.=4
Strongly Agree dev.=0.9
ab.=6

12345

0% 0% 5.3% 5.3% 89.5% n=19
av.=4.8
Strongly Agree dev.=0.5

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Profile Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev n=19 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Angela Latham n=19 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts n=19 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
n=18 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.2
Name of the course: n=16 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
(Name of the survey) n=19 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
Values used in the profile line: Mean n=9 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
n=8 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
1. 1 n=13 av.=4.0 md=4.0 dev.=0.9
n=19 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev Profile
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts +

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - av.=4.6 dev.=0.6

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 7

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
FA17

TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 18

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=4.9
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=0.3
Global Index
av.=4.9
1. 1 dev.=0.3

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 11.1% 88.9% n=18
av.=4.9
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.3

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=18
0% 0% 5.6% 5.6% 88.9% av.=4.8
dev.=0.5
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=18
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=5
0% 0% 0% 0% 100% dev.=0

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=18
av.=5
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0
0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.7
dev.=0.7
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 11.1% 11.1% 77.8% n=18
av.=4.8
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.4

12345 n=18
0% 0% 0% 22.2% 77.8% av.=4.8
dev.=0.4
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=12
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345 av.=5
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 0% 16.7% 83.3% dev.=0
ab.=5
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
Page 1
12345
0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% n=12
av.=5
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0
Strongly Disagree ab.=5
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 12.5% 0% 0% 87.5% n=16
av.=4.6
Strongly Agree dev.=1
ab.=2

12345

0% 0% 0% 5.6% 94.4% n=18
av.=4.9
Strongly Agree dev.=0.2

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.3
class. Disagree Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Strongly Agree n=18 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Disagree Strongly Agree n=12 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree n=12 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=1.0
Disagree Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.2
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Profile

Name of the instructor: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - + av.=4.9 dev.=0.3

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

Angela Latham
FA17

CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication
No. of responses = 12

Overall indicators -1 2 3 4 5+ av.=3.2
-1 2 3 4 5+ dev.=1.2
Global Index
av.=3.2
1. 1 dev.=1.2

Survey Results
1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 18.2% 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% n=11
av.=3.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=1.1

1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 n=12
25% 8.3% 25% 33.3% 8.3% av.=2.9
dev.=1.4
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=12
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 av.=3.4
16.7% 8.3% 8.3% 50% 16.7% dev.=1.4

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=12
av.=3.6
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=1.2
8.3% 8.3% 25% 33.3% 25%
n=12
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=3.6
dev.=1.3
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345
questions or concerns. 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 41.7% 25% n=12
av.=2.8
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=1.1

12345 n=12
25% 0% 50% 25% 0% av.=2.6
dev.=1.2
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
n=4
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 1234 5 av.=4
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 25% 16.7% 33.3% 25% 0% dev.=0.8
ab.=8
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
Page 1
12345
0% 0% 25% 50% 25%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation

Angela Latham, CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 14.3% 14.3% 42.9% 28.6% 0% n=7
av.=2.9
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=1.1
Strongly Disagree ab.=5
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree
this subject. 12345

0% 18.2% 36.4% 36.4% 9.1% n=11
av.=3.4
Strongly Agree dev.=0.9
ab.=1

12345

25% 8.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0% n=12
av.=2.8
Strongly Agree dev.=1.2

12345

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

Profile

Subunit: Communication
Angela Latham
Name of the instructor: CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=11 av.=3.6 md=4.0 dev.=1.1
class. Disagree Strongly Agree n=12 av.=2.9 md=3.0 dev.=1.4
Strongly Agree n=12 av.=3.4 md=4.0 dev.=1.4
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Strongly Strongly Agree n=12 av.=3.6 md=4.0 dev.=1.2
an effective manner. Disagree Strongly Agree n=12 av.=3.6 md=4.0 dev.=1.3
Strongly Agree n=12 av.=2.8 md=3.0 dev.=1.1
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=12 av.=2.6 md=3.0 dev.=1.2
Disagree Strongly Agree n=4 av.=4.0 md=4.0 dev.=0.8
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Agree n=7 av.=2.9 md=3.0 dev.=1.1
subject matter. Strongly Strongly Agree n=11 av.=3.4 md=3.0 dev.=0.9
Disagree Strongly Agree n=12 av.=2.8 md=3.0 dev.=1.2
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class.
Strongly
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Disagree
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped
me learn in this class. Strongly
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair.
Strongly
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in Disagree
lecture and/or assigned reading.
Strongly
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a Disagree
reasonable period of time.
Strongly
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other Disagree
students if they wanted to learn this subject.
Strongly
Disagree

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

Subunit: Profile

Name of the instructor: Communication
Angela Latham
Name of the course: CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication
(Name of the survey)

1. 1 - + av.=3.2 dev.=1.2

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, CO-3403-04 Photographic Communication

01/10/2018 Class Climate evaluation Page 6









Non-ArtistExhibitionAwardWinnersforSpring2017
Non-ArtistExhibitionAwardWinnersforFall2017

Awards Spring 2017 Awards

Projects Section 1 Multi Media Stained Glass Slip Ca

1 Section 1 1st Griffin St. Louis Griffin St. Louis Mallory
2 2nd Sarah Andrews Elizabeth Kubik Payton
3 3rd Haley Hobart Mary Ki
4 Honorable Mention Darby Hughes Kourtney Atwell Sarah A
5 Payton Allen Alex Fava Alex Fav
6 Mallory Benoit Mya Henson Mya He
7 Mya Henson Darby Hughes Haley H
8 Haley Hobart Mary King Darby H
9 Mary King Jennifer Lambers Elizabet
10 Elizabeth Kubik Cailtin Light Jennifer
11 Jennifer Lambers Merrie Morgan Volk Cailtin L
12 Araceli Landaverde Darby N
13 Darby Neal Melissa
14 Merrie Morgan Volk Luke Sim
15 Merrie M

Awards Multi Media Stained Glass Slip Ca

Projects Section 2 Moriah Lorge Molly Le
Heather Bruff Ashley B
1 Section 2 1st Christian Griffith Ellen Doty Ellen Do
2 2nd Rylee Laborde Parker Butler Alex Bai
3 3rd Olivia Maddox Emma Dahl Parker B
4 Honorable Mention Rodney Kipchumba Emma D
5 Ashley Brooks Sara McMahan Moriah
6 Heather Bruff Madison Monroe Yoised M
7 Parker Butler Juliann Scott Jace Mc
8 Emma Dahl T. J. Shelby Sara Mc
9 Ellen Doty Austin Wade Juliann
10 Sara McMahan T. J. She
11 Juliann Scott Austin W
12 Dominic Smith
13
14
15

ast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito William Morris Award

y Benoit Melissa Scavelli Hannah Bashford
Allen Darby Hughes
ing Araceli Landaverde William Morris Award
Andrews Sarah Andrews
va Kourtney Atwell Jacob Fischer
enson Alex Fava
Hobart Haley Hobart
Hughes Mary King
th Kubik Cailtin Light
r Lambers Carvey Magee
Light Taylor Reeves
Neal Luke Simmons
a Scavelli Griffin St. Louis
mmons
Morgan Volk

ast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito

easure Sara McMahan
Brooks Juliann Scott
oty Heather Bruff
iley Parker Butler
Butler Mackenzie Carver
Dahl Emma Dahl
Lorge Christian Griffith
Martinez Rylee Laborde
cCardle Moriah Lorge
cMahan Olivia Maddox
Scott Madison Monroe
elby Shelby Thompson
Wade

Awards Multi Media Stained Glass Slip Ca

Projects Section 3

1 Section 3 1st Mary Catherine Sobiesk Alex Calhoun Blake Co
2 2nd Mary Catherine Sobiesk Ashlyn G
3 3rd Alex Calhoun Vanessa Raines Tyler W
4 Honorable Mention Sarah Powell
5 Anna Bowling Arman Borazjani Andre B
6 Katherine Cresap Anna Bowling Arman B
7 Brittany Dance Blake Conner Anna Bo
8 Grant Davis Grant Davis Alex Cal
9 Vanessa Raines Reagan Livingston Brittany
10 Robert L
11 Rachel Stephens Nesha P
12
13 Azlin Re
14 Bailey R
15

Awards Multi Media Stained Glass Slip Ca

Projects Section 4 Easton Williams Mary Lu
Madeline Walley Mary Da
1 Section 4 1st Julia Matson Courtney Hill Roxie Ra
2 2nd Megill Imes Corey Clayton Corey C
3 3rd Easton Williams Emily Crace Chance
4 Honorable Mention Emily Crace Mary Dade Ford Megill Im
5 Mary Dade Ford Chance Gaddis Alyssa J
6 Megill Imes Rachel K
7 Sarah Heifner Alyssa Jacobs Julia Ma
8 Courtney Hill Abigail Jernigan Jessie O
9 Santana Holloway Rachel Kane Kristen
10 Alyssa Jacobs Mary Luke Madelin
11 Abigail Jernigan Julia Matson Easton W
12 Jessie Odom
13 Rachel Kane Amelia Ramsey
14 Erin McDevitt Roxie Raven
15 Jessie Odom Kasey Rito
Roxie Raven Kristen Sheppard

ast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito Video Presentation William Morris Award

onner Rachel Stephens Breauna Contant
Greenway Azlin Reed
Wilson Blake Conner
Beckman Katherine Cresap
Borazjani Alex Calhoun
owling Brittany Dance
lhoun Jalyn McDonald
y Dance Nesha Plain
Lockhart Vanessa Raines
Plain
eed Bailey Reid
Reid Mary Catherine Sobiesk
Tyler Wilson

ast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito Video Presentation William Morris Award

uke Alyssa Jacobs Mariana Santana
ade Ford Easton Williams
aven Rachel Kane
Clayton Corey Clayton
Gaddis Mary Dade Ford
mes Sarah Heifner
Jacobs Megill Imes
Kane Charles Provine
atson
Odom
Sheppard
ne Walley
Williams

Fall 2017 Awards

Awards Walter Inglis
Anderson Stain
Projects Section 1 Gustav Stickley
1 Section 1 1st Multi Media Glass
2 2nd Will Keeler
3 3rd Lauren Easter Victoria Kohler
4 Honorable Mention PJ Jarquin Lauren Easter
5 Will Keeler Calvin Brown
6 Calvin Brown Matthew Comish
7 Madison Cade Destine'e Donald
8 Kelsie Hall Kathleen Riley
9 Victoria Kohler Valerie Ventura
10 Kathleen Riley
11 Zack Stout Walter Inglis
12 Billy Zhang Anderson
13
14 Stained Glass
15 Sam Sprow
Kiera Reardon
Awards Charles Gill
Laura Creekmore
Projects Section 2 Gustav Stickley Anna Curtis
1 Section 2 1st Multi Media Taylor Cvercko
2 2nd Molly Dance
3 3rd Kiera Reardon Tiffany Davis
4 Honorable Mention Sam Sprow Amanda Harfst
5 Courtney Wynn Allison O'Leary
6 Kensey Thomas Thomas Camp Ashlianna Owen
7 Courtney Wynn Anna Curtis Regan Sanders
8 Molly Dance Grant Santilli
9 Tiffany Davis Mason Smylie
10 Charles Gill Courtney Wynn
11 Amanda Harfst
12 Kallie Maddox
13 Dylan McDonald
14 Sarah McHale
15 Allison O'Leary
Regan Sanders
Grant Santilli

ned Newcomb Pottery Frank Lloyd Wright William Morris Award
Slip Cast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito Hannah Jones
Kathleen Riley
Valerie Ventura Will Keeler
Keeton Treadwell Libby Reaves
Libby Reaves Andrew Atkinson
Destine'e Donald Madison Cade
Mattie Fritscher Matthew Comish
Kelsie Hall Destine'e Donald
PJ Jarquin Mattie Fritscher
Will Keeler Alexa Hynes
Victoria Kohler PJ Jarquin
Robyn Kohlheim Victoria Kohler
Shelby Marsh Cody McLaughlin
Kathleen Riley Madison Taylor
Zack Stout Valerie Ventura
Billy Zhang Billy Zhang

Newcomb Pottery Frank Lloyd Wright William Morris Award
Slip Cast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito David Owens
Amanda Harfst
Sam Sprow Allison O'Leary
Kensey Thomas Kensey Thomas
Dylan McDonald Taylor Cvercko
Thomas Camp Tiffany Davis
Taylor Cvercko Charles Gill
Josh Kitchens Sarah McHale
Kallie Maddox Allison O'Leary
Sarah McHale Ashlianna Owen
Allison O'Leary Kiera Reardon
Ashlianna Owen Regan Sanders
Grant Santilli Mason Smylie
Daniel Schingle Sam Sprow
Mason Smylie
Allison Williams
Courtney Wynn

Awards Gustav Stickley Walter Inglis
Multi Media Anderson Staine
Projects Section 3
Glass
1 Section 3 1st Julia Tomkies
2 2nd Kimberly Call Walter Inglis
3 3rd Kurt Junkersfeld Anderson
4 Honorable Mention Meredith Brock
5 Kacy Chapman Stained Glass
6 Jordan Frese Alex Wedderstrand
7 Kris Gatlin Tristan Boyett
8 Madison Greer Abbey Fleming
9 Tracie Hobbs Brandon Anderson
10 Kristen Simmons Amelia Andersson
11 Gabrielle Treigle Sara Herfurth
12 Muriel Vivians Hasna Khandekar
13 Jessica Milner
14 Victoria Nielsen
15 Sandy Ritchie
Lauren Scott
Awards Daniel Sieja
Kayla Stephenson
Projects Section 4 Gustav Stickley LeAnn Ward
Multi Media Hannah Watson

1 Section 4 1st Vy Nguyen
2 2nd Sarah Hartung
3 3rd Lauren Scott
4 Honorable Mention Amelia Andersson
5 Tristan Boyett
6 Abbey Fleming
7 Sara Herfurth
8 Hasna Khandekar
9 Jessica Milner
10 Daniel Sieja
11 Kayla Stephenson
12 LeAnn Ward
13 Hannah Watson
14 Alex Wedderstrand
15

ed Newcomb Pottery Frank Lloyd Wright
Slip Cast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito William Morris Award

Kris Gatlin Muriel Vivians Nick Gant
Tracie Hobbs Kimberly Call
Kurt Junkersfeld Kristen Simmons
Meredith Brock Meredith Brock
Kacy Chapman Justin Ehrgott
Hannah Eakes Jordan Frese
Destiny Larry Kris Gatlin
Bethany Neyland Tracie Hobbs
Alaina O'Bryant Kurt Junkersfeld
Kristen Simmons Destiny Larry
Brayden Stokes Darlene Lukes
Gabrielle Treigle Amanda May
Ansley Vaughn Marissa Powell
Gabrielle Treigle
Ansley Vaughn

Newcomb Pottery Frank Lloyd Wright
Slip Cast Mold Slip Cast Sgraffito William Morris Award

Alex Wedderstrand Jessica Milner Hallie Earwood
Hasna Khandekar Sandy Ritchie
Matthew Ayala Vy Nguyen
Amelia Andersson Amelia Andersson
Tristan Boyett Tristan Boyett
Sahil Duvvuri Sarah Hartung
Abbey Fleming Sara Herfurth
Sarah Hartung Hasna Khandekar
Sara Herfurth Lauren Scott
Jessica Milner John Suedel
Victoria Nielsen LeAnn Ward
Vy Nguyen Alex Wedderstrand
LeAnn Ward
Hannah Watson

AwardsfortheNon-ArtistExhibition

CreationofNon-ArtistExhibitionAwards







Developmental Activities

Developmental activities include the implementation of technology into the Honors
History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts course by imparting in them the knowledge
of two different software applications, Camtaisia 8 and Adobe Spark. Adobe Spark is
one of the newer Adobe applications and is taught through a hands on method, while
the Camtaisia 8 application is taught through directional materials created. These
applications allow them to tell a digital story or make a video about their journey
through the semester with their artist. The students choose an artist of the Arts and Crafts
Movement Era and they pay homage to that artist through all of their works for the
semester. They then create a video or digital story based on all of those created works
incorporating that artist in the video. They are encouraged to give a creative storyline
that allows the viewer to learn about the artist through their works.

Angela Latham

Self-Evaluation

TKI-2413-01, 02, 03, H04– History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts,

CO-3403 Photographic Communication

I am now moving in on my fifth year teaching the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts, and I love it
even more now than when I first got started. Each semester I find a better way of clarifying to the
students how to accomplish their objectives and I realize that they are completing them much faster
which allows them to get to the most complicated situations and give those more time. I have broken
down each class section by timed objectives for them to accomplish all processes of each project, this
helps them to be accountable for each step taken and for the class as a whole to get all of the necessary
information, as well for myself to be more efficient with each class time.

I find myself wanting to push my students to new heights in their lives since they don’t realize what they
are capable of creatively. With that in mind, the next adventure that I plan to impart to my students is a
glass molding project.

I have once again had the opportunity of working with a new student worker; this is always extremely
helpful in the success of these classes. There is much preparation, clean up and assistance during the
class periods, that I don’t know how it would successfully get accomplished without the help of
awesome student workers.

I had the opportunity to expand my experience in teaching a photography class in the Fall semester, in
the Communication Department. The addition of this class taught me that I could stretch myself in areas
that cause me to emphasize priorities constructively. With this being the first time that I taught the
class, the information assembled for the class became a process during the semester. The time that it
took to prepare for the class with new material will be helpful should this be a venture that I partake of
in the future.



COURSE OUTLINE

January 9th Get to Know You Introductions, Syllabus Overview,
Presentation and Introduction to the History and
January 16th Appreciation of the Art-Crafts.
January 23rd Demonstration and Launch of Project 1 – Multi-Media
January 30th (Create abstract watercolor and create 4 designs using
February 6th shapes, create marker, chalk, and acrylic paint design
February 13th overlaying the watercolor)

February 20th Martin Luther King Holiday – No Class

February 27th Demonstration and Launch of Project 2 – Slip Cast Mold
Demonstration – Project 1– Workday
(Choose slip cast mold, band it up and pour slip into it,
Create template of chosen design, trace shapes onto
watercolor)

Demonstration – Project 1 and 2– Workday
(Remove and clean up slip cast, continue to trace
shapes onto watercolor and then adhere watercolor to
matte board OMITTING CIRCLES IF ANY)

Project 2 - Due Date

Demonstration – Project 1 – Workday
(Glaze bisqueware for firing and Cut out shapes from
watercolor/matte board, chalk background board, using
foamcore reliefs decide the levels)

Demonstration – Project 2 – Workday
(Continue to cut out shapes from watercolor/matte
board, chalk background board, using foamcore reliefs
decide the levels, cut glass for glass fusion, and start
adhering shapes to background board with relief
foamcore to background board)
ALL GLASS NEEDS TO BE CUT TODAY!

Project 1 - Due Date

The Arts and Crafts Movement in America PowerPoint
uploaded on to Blackboard,
Project 1 – Workday
Introduction and Launch of Project 3 – Slip Cast Sgraffito
(Choose slip cast mold, band it up and pour slip into it,
Complete adhering shapes to background board with
relief foamcore to background board and adhere glass
fusion to complete the project)

Demonstration – Project 3 – Workday
Remove and clean up slip cast, apply underglaze and let
dry, research design for Sgraffito Project and transfer
design onto slip cast piece.
MUST HAVE DESIGN COMPLETELY CARVED INTO
PIECE BY FRIDAY, MARCH 3rd.

March 6th Project 3 - Due Date,
8” x 10” Glass – Due
March 13th
March 20th Introduction and Launch of Project 4 - Stained Glass
March 27th Mosaic
April 3rd (Glaze bisqueware for firing, research Walter Inglis
April 10th Anderson Image and save as name to desktop, apply
April 17th border to 8 x 10 glass, and trace puzzle like pieces onto
April 24th tracing paper for stained glass mosaic, FINISH FOR
May 2nd HOMEWORK OVER BREAK)

Spring Break

Project 2 Framed Completion - Due Date,

Demonstration – Project 4 – Workday
(Cut glass into created shapes for stained glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 - Due Date,

(Grout Stained Glass Mosaic)

Clean Up Day!
The History of Ceramics and Stained Glass PowerPoint
uploaded

Final Exam 3pm – 6pm

All projects due on the projected dates will be due by end of class day.

January 10th COURSE OUTLINE

January 17th Get to Know You Introductions, Syllabus Overview,
January 24th Presentation and Introduction to the History and
January 31st Appreciation of the Art-Crafts.
February 7th Demonstration and Launch of Project 1 – Multi-Media
February 14th and Project 2 – Slip Cast Mold
(Choose slip cast mold, band it up and pour slip into it,
February 21st Create abstract watercolor)

February 28th Demonstration – Project 1 and 2– Workday
(Remove and clean up slip cast, create marker, chalk,
and acrylic paint design overlaying the watercolor)

Project 2 - Due Date

Demonstration – Project 1 and 2– Workday
(Glaze bisqueware for firing and and create 4 designs
using shapes)

Demonstration – Project 1– Workday
(Create template of chosen design, trace shapes onto
watercolor and then adhere watercolor to matte board
OMITTING CIRCLES IF ANY)

Demonstration – Project 1 – Workday
(Cut out shapes from watercolor/matte board, chalk
background board, using foamcore reliefs decide the
levels, cut glass for glass fusion)

Demonstration – Project 1 – Workday
(Continue to cut out shapes from watercolor/matte
board, chalk background board, using foamcore reliefs
decide the levels, cut glass for glass fusion, and start
adhering shapes to background board with relief
foamcore to background board)
ALL GLASS NEEDS TO BE CUT TODAY!

Project 1 - Due Date

The Arts and Crafts Movement in America PowerPoint
uploaded on to Blackboard,
Project 1 – Workday
Introduction and Launch of Project 3 – Slip Cast Sgraffito
(Choose slip cast mold, band it up and pour slip into it,
Complete adhering shapes to background board with
relief foamcore to background board and adhere glass
fusion to complete the project)

Demonstration – Project 3 – Workday
Remove and clean up slip cast, apply underglaze and let
dry, research design for Sgraffito Project and transfer
design onto slip cast piece.
MUST HAVE DESIGN COMPLETELY CARVED INTO
PIECE BY FRIDAY, MARCH 3rd.

March 7th Project 3 - Due Date, 8” x 10” Glass – Due

March 14th Introduction and Launch of Project 4 - Stained Glass
March 21st Mosaic
March 28th (Glaze bisqueware for firing, research Walter Inglis
April 4th Anderson Image and save as name to desktop, apply
April 11th border to 8 x 10 glass, and trace puzzle like pieces onto
April 18th tracing paper for stained glass mosaic, FINISH FOR
April 25th HOMEWORK OVER BREAK)
May 1st
Spring Break

Project 2 Framed Completion - Due Date,

Demonstration – Project 4 – Workday
(Cut glass into created shapes for stained glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 - Due Date,

(Grout Stained Glass Mosaic)

Clean Up Day!
The History of Ceramics and Stained Glass PowerPoint
uploaded

Final Exam 3pm – 6pm

All projects due on the projected dates will be due by end of class day.

January 11th COURSE OUTLINE

January 18th Get to Know You Introductions, Syllabus Overview,
January 25th Presentation and Introduction to the History and
Appreciation of the Art-Crafts.
February 1st Demonstration and Launch of Project 1 – Multi-Media
and Project 2 – Slip Cast Mold
February 8th (Choose slip cast mold, band it up and pour slip into it,
February 15th Create abstract watercolor)

February 22nd Demonstration – Project 1 and 2– Workday
(Remove and clean up slip cast, create marker, chalk,
March 1st and acrylic paint design overlaying the watercolor)

Project 2 - Due Date

Demonstration – Project 1 and 2– Workday
(Glaze bisqueware for firing and and create 4 designs
using shapes)

Demonstration – Project 1– Workday
(Create template of chosen design, trace shapes onto
watercolor and then adhere watercolor to matte board
OMITTING CIRCLES IF ANY)

Demonstration – Project 1 – Workday
(Cut out shapes from watercolor/matte board, chalk
background board, using foamcore reliefs decide the
levels, cut glass for glass fusion)

Demonstration – Project 1 – Workday
(Continue to cut out shapes from watercolor/matte
board, chalk background board, using foamcore reliefs
decide the levels, cut glass for glass fusion, and start
adhering shapes to background board with relief
foamcore to background board)
ALL GLASS NEEDS TO BE CUT TODAY!

Project 1 - Due Date

The Arts and Crafts Movement in America PowerPoint
uploaded on to Blackboard,
Project 1 – Workday
Introduction and Launch of Project 3 – Slip Cast Sgraffito
(Choose slip cast mold, band it up and pour slip into it,
Complete adhering shapes to background board with
relief foamcore to background board and adhere glass
fusion to complete the project)

Demonstration – Project 3 – Workday
Remove and clean up slip cast, apply underglaze and let
dry, research design for Sgraffito Project and transfer
design onto slip cast piece.
MUST HAVE DESIGN COMPLETELY CARVED INTO
PIECE BY FRIDAY, MARCH 4TH.

March 8th Mid Term Exam, Project 3 - Due Date,
8” x 10” Glass – Due
March 15th
March 22nd Introduction and Launch of Project 4 - Stained Glass
March 29th Mosaic
April 5th (Glaze bisqueware for firing, research Walter Inglis
April 12th Anderson Image and save as name to desktop, apply
April 19th border to 8 x 10 glass, and trace puzzle like pieces onto
April 26th tracing paper for stained glass mosaic, FINISH FOR
May 5th HOMEWORK OVER BREAK)

Spring Break

Project 2 Framed Completion - Due Date,

Demonstration – Project 4 – Workday
(Cut glass into created shapes for stained glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 – Workday
(Continue to cut glass into created shapes for stained
glass mosaic)

Project 4 - Due Date,

(Grout Stained Glass Mosaic)

Clean Up Day!
The History of Ceramics and Stained Glass PowerPoint
uploaded

Final Exam 3pm – 6pm

All projects due on the projected dates will be due by end of class day.