thesis

288

Isaac, S., & Michael, W.B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego,
CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.

Isik-Ercan, Z., Kim, B., & Nowak, J. (2010). 3D Visualization in Elementary
Education Astronomy: Teaching Urban Second Graders about the Sun, Earth,
and Moon. In Knowledge Management, Information Systems, E-Learning,
and Sustainability Research (pp. 500-505). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Diperoleh daripada http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-
16318-064.

Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach.
Cengage Learning. (5th). Thomson: Wadsworth.

Jamaludin Ahmad & Sidek Mohd Noah. (2001). Pendekatan Alternatif Menentukan
Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul Program Maju Diri, Jabatan
Pendidikan Selangor. Jurnal PERKAMA. 9: 97–118.

Jamaludin Ahmad. (2002). Kesahan, Kebolehpercayaan dan Keberkesanan Modul
Program Maju Diri Ke Atas Motivasi Pencapaian Di Kalangan Pelajar
Sekolah Menengah Negeri Selangor. Tesis Doktor FalsafahTidak Diterbitkan.
Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Johnson, B and Christensen, L. (2004) Educational Research: Quantitative,
Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. (2nd ed.) Boston : Pearson. Edu. Inc.

Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. Reigeluth
(Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: Volume II. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of
Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362-381.

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical
thinking. Prentice Hall.

Jones, K & Holmes, S. (2002), Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Geometry. In:
Linda Haggarty (Ed), Aspects of Teaching Secondary Mathematics:
perspectives on practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Chapter 8, pp 121-139.
ISBN: 0-415-26641-6

Jones, K. and Mooney, C. (2003), Making Space for Geometry in Primary
Mathematics. In: I. Thompson (Ed), Enhancing Primary Mathematics
Teaching. London: Open University Press. 3-15.

289

Julious, S. A. (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot
study. Pharm Stat, 4(4), 287-291.

Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics
computer games on mathematics achievement and class
motivation. Computers & education, 55(2), 427-443.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, KPM (2015) Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan
Pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan 1. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan
Kurikulum.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, KPM (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum
Standard Sekolah Menengah. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan
Kurikulum.

Klieme, E., Artelt, C., Hartig, J., Jude, N., Köller, O., Prenzel, M., Schneider, W &
Stanat, P. (2010). PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt. Münster:
Waxmann.

Knight, K. C. (2006). An investigation into the change in the Van Hiele levels of
understanding geometry of pre-service elementary and secondary
mathematics teachers. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Maine.

Koch, D.S. (2006).The effects of solid modeling and visualization on technical
problem solving. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Virginia. Polytechnic
Institute and State University, Blacksburg

Konyalioğlu, A. C., Aksu, Z., & Şenel, E. Ö. (2012). The preference of visualization
in teaching and learning absolute value. International Journal of
Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 613-626.

Kor, L. K., & Lim, C. S. (2009). Lesson study: A potential driving force behind the
innovative use of Geometer’s SketchPad. Journal of Mathematics
Education, 2(1), 69-82.

Kosko KW, Wilkins JL. (2010). Mathematical communication and its relation to the
frequency of manipulative use. International Electronic Journal of
Mathematic Education, 5(2): 79-90.

Krontong, K. (2010). A Study of Constructivist in Mathematics in Virtual Class with
Moodle and the Geometer‘s Sketchpad. Diperoleh daripada http://atcm.
mathandtech. org/EP2011/invited_papers/3272011_19339.

Kurtulus, A., & Uygan, C. (2010). The effects of Google Sketchup based geometry
activities and projects on spatial visualization ability of student mathematics

290

teachers. World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Administra- tion (pp.
384–389). Cairo, Egypt: Elsevier Ltd.
Kyttälä, M. (2008). Visuospatial working memory in adolescents with poor
performance in mathematics: variation depending on reading skills.
Educational Psychology, 28(3), 273–289.
Kyttälä, M., & Lehto, J. (2008). Some factors underlying mathematical performance:
The role of visuospatial working memory and non-verbal intelligence.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22,77–94.
Kosko, K. W., & Wilkins, J. L. (2010). Mathematical communication and its relation
to the frequency of manipulative use. International Electronic Journal of
Mathematics Education, 5(2), 79-90.
Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M.(2010). Trade-off in object versus
spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual-
processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1) (2010), 29-35.
Routledge.
La Ferla, V., Olkun, S., Akkurt, Z., Alibeyoglu, M. C., Oprukçu Gonulates, F., &
Accascina, G. (2009). An international comparison of the effect of using
computer manipulatives on pre-service and middle grades students‘
understanding of three-dimensional buildings. Proceedings of the 9th
International Conference on Technology in Mathematics (pp. 1-5). Metz,
France: ICTMT 9.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning.
Educational leadership, 68(1), 34-37.
Larry, C. (1985). Experimental Methodology. (Third Edition). Boston: Allyn and
Bacon, Inc. 359 pages.
Lee, S.J. (2014). Early childhood teachers‘ misconceptions about mathematics
education for young children in the United States. Early Education and
Development, 18(1): 111-143.

Leech, N. L., Barret, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2011). Repeated-measures and mixed
anovas. In IBM SPSS for Intermediate Statistics Use and Interpretation(pp.
175-184). Taylor & Francis Group New York.

Lim, C. S. (2006). Promoting Peer Collaboration among Pre-service Mathematics
teachers through Lesson Study Process. In Yoong Suan et al (Eds.).

291

Proceedings of XII IOSTE Symposium: Science and Technology in the
Service of Mankind, pp. 590–593, 30 July–4 August 2006, organized by the
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.
Lim, C. S., White, A. L., & Chiew, C. M. (2005). Promoting Mathematics Teacher
Collaboration through Lesson Study: What Can We Learn from Two
Countries‘ Experience. In A. Rogerson (Ed.). Proceedings of the 8th
International Conference of The Mathematics Education into the 21st
Century Project:"Reform, Revolution and Paradigm Shifts in Mathematics
Education", pp. 135–139.
Lira. J & Ezeife. A.N. (2008). Strengthening IntermediateLevel Mathematics
Teaching Using Manipulatives: A Theory-Backed Discourse. Academic
Exchange Extra. Ontario: Academic Exchange - EXTRA.
Lok Yian Lin. (2010). Keberkesanan Perisian Geometer SketchPad untuk Tajuk
Pembinaan Geometri dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik. Phd
Tesis.UTM: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management
Journal, 53(6), 1305-1335.
Losasso, F., Hoppe, H., Schaefer, S., & Warren, J. (2003, June). Smooth geometry
images. In Symposium on Geometry Processing (Vol. 43, pp. 138-145).
Mackrell, K. & Wilder, P.J. (2005). Thinking geometrically. In Teaching Secondary
Mathematics with ICT eds. S. Johnston-Wilder, and D. Pimm, 81-100, Milton
Keynes: Open University Press
Maizam Alias, Black, T. R and Gray, D.E. (2002). Effect of instruction on spatial
visualization ability in civil engineering students. International Education
Journal, 3(1), 1-12. http//iej.cjb.ne.
Marr, D. 1982, Vision: A Computational Approach, San Francisco, Freeman & Co.
Martin, T, Svihla, V. & Smith, C. P. (2012). The role of physical action in fraction
learning. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(1): 1-17
Martin, A., Linfoot, K. & Stephenson, J. (1999). How Teachers Respond to Concerns
About Misbehaviour in Their Classroom. Psychology in the Schools 36: 347-
358
Martín‐Gutiérrez, J., Gil, F. A., Contero, M., & Saorín, J. L. (2013). Dynamic three‐
dimensional illustrator for teaching descriptive geometry and training
visualisation skills. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21(1),

292

8-25.Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning. USA: Cambride University
Press.
Mason, M. (1998). The van Hiele levels of geometric understanding. The
professional handbook for teachers: Geometry, 4, 4-8.
Mateya, M. (2008). Using the Van Hiele Theory to Analyse Geometrical
Conceptualisation in Grade 12 Students: A Namibian Perspective.
Grahamstown: Rhodes University. 290 pages.
McCarney, R., Warner, J., Iliffe, S., Van Haselen, R., Griffin, M., & Fisher, P.
(2007). The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC medical
research methodology, 7(1), 30.
McGee, M. G.(1979). Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and
environmental, genetic, hormon and neurological influences.Psychological
Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918.
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia
medica, 22(3), 276-282.
McKim, R. H. (1980). Experiences in Visual Thinking (2 ed.). Monterey, California:
Brooks/Cole.
Meng, C. C. (2009). Enhancing Students‘ Geometric Thinking Through Phase-Based
Instruction Using Geometer ‘ S Sketchpad : A Case Study, 89–107.
Meng, C. C., & Idris, N. (2012). Enhancing students' Geometric thinking and
achievement in solid geometry. Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 15-
33.
Meng, C. C., Sam, L. C., Yew, W. T., & Lian, L. H. (2014). Effect of Lesson on
Study on Pre-service Secondary Teachers‘ Technological Pedagogical Content
Knowledge. Sains Humanika, 2(4).
Merriam, S.B. & Brockett, R.G. (2011). The Profession and Practice of Adult
Education: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley and Sons
Meyer, B. (1988). Object-oriented software construction (Vol. 2, pp. 331-410). New
York: Prentice hall.
Miller, S. J. (1992). "Wax isomerization using catalyst of specific pore geometry."
U.S. Patent No. 5,135,638. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office.
Miller, C. L., & Bertoline, G. R. (1991). Spatial Visualization Research and Theories:
Their Importance in the Development of an Engineering and Technical

293

Design Graphics Curriculum Model. Engineering Design Graphics
Journal, 55(3), 5-14.
Mohamed, N. (2013). Komitmen ibu bapa menerusi PIBG dalam membantu
pencapaian akademik pelajar (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein
Onn Malaysia).
Mohd. Najib Konting. (1998). Teacher effectiveness: the beliefs of effective bahasa
melayu teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 6(1), 1-
12.
Mohd Safarin Nordin. Kesan penggunaan pemodelan bongkah 3-dimensi dalam
pengajaran ke atas kemahiran visualisasi pelajar aliran teknikal sekolah
menengah teknik. (2009).Thesis PhD UTM: Unpublished.
Mohd Safarin Nordin & Muhammad Sukri Saud. (2007). Kajian Awal Terhadap
Kebolehan Ruang Pelajar-Pelajar Pengajian Kejuruteraan di Sekolah-
Sekolah Menengah Teknik. Presented Paper at 1st International Malaysian
Educational Technology Convention.1196-1203
Mohd Salleh. A, Mohamed Bilal, A., & Tong, T. (2012). Assisting Primary School
Children to Progress through Their van Hiele ‘ s Levels of Geometry Thinking
Using Google SketchUp. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 75–
84. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.010.
Mohd Salleh. A, & Zaid Zainal. (2013). Improving the levels of geometric thinking
of secondary school students using geometry learning video based on Van
Hiele theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
(IJERE), 2(1), 16-22.
Mohd Salleh Tahar, Ahmad Esa, Mohd Bekri Rahim, Jamil Abd Baser, Syazwani
Shuib & Yahya Buntat. (2011). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Cd Interaktif
Lukisan Isometrik Terhadap Kemahiran Visualisasi Pelajar. Journal of
Technical, Vocational & Engineering Educational Volume 3, Pages 104-115
/ISSN: 2231-7376
Mok Soon Sang.(2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Ipoh: CIPTA Printing & Publishing
(M) Sdn Bhd.
Mouza, C., & Lavigne, N. (2012). Emerging Technologies for the Classroom: A
Learning Sciences Perspective. Springer. Diperoleh from
http://link.springer.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/book/10.1007%2F978-1-
4614-4696-5

294

Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives?.

Teaching children mathematics, 8(6), 372-377. Diperoleh from
http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/stable/41197834?seq=3

Moyer, P.S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach

mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2): 175-197.

Mohler, J. L. (2001). Using interactive multimedia technologies to improve student

understanding of spatially-dependent engineering concepts. In Proceedings of

the GraphiCon.

Monica, L., Gorghiu, G., Dumitrescu, C., Lucian, R., & Elena, A. .(2011). Social and
Integrating ICT in Traditional Training - Reactions of Teachers and Pupils‘
Involved in FISTE Project Activities, 00, 1142–1146.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.223

Mullis, Michael O. Martin, Pierre Foy, and Alka Arora.(2012). Timss 2011

International Results in Mathematics Ina.: TIMSS & PIRLS International

Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College Chestnut Hill,

MA, USA and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational

Achievement (IEA) IEA Secretariat Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Murray, S. (2006). A cognitive architecture that combines internal simulation with a

global workspace. Consciousness and cognition, 15(2), 433-449.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.

Harvard Educational Review. 66 (1), 60-92. Nicol, David; Macfarlane-Dick,

Debra (2005) Rethinking Formative Assessment in HE: a theoretical model

and seven principles of good feedback practice. Quality Assurance Agency

for Higher Education.
Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. (2006). ―Formative Assessment and Self-

Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback

Practice.‖ Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218.

Noraini Idris. (2009). The Impact of Using Geometers' sketchpad on Malaysian

Students' Achievement and van Hiele Geometric thinking. Journal of

Mathematics Education. December 2009. vol 2, no 2, pp 94 -107 .
Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Second Edition. Kuala

Lumpur: Utusan Publication Sdn. Bhd.

Noraini Idris. (1998). Spatial Visualization, Field Dependence/Independence, Van

Hiele Level, and Achievement in Geometry: The Influence of Selected

295

Activities for Middle School Students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
The Ohio State University.
Noraini Idris. (2006). Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Making Sense and
Developing Cognitive Abilities. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication Sdn. Bhd
Noraini Idris, & Tay, B. L. (2004). Teaching and Learning of Geometry: Problem and
Prospects. Masalah Pendidikan, 27. Pp. 165-178. ISSN 0126-5024
Noraini Idris, Granamalar, E., & Rohaida, S. (2004). Teknologi Dalam Pendidikan
Sains dan Matematik, Kuala Lumpur, Universiti Malaya.
Mohamad Safarin Nordin & Fatimah, S. (2012). Decomposing total factor
productivity growth in small and medium enterprises, SMEs. Indian Journal
of Science and Technology, 5(5), 2706-2712.
Noor Izana Abdul Halim (2012). Mengatasi Kesukaran Pembelajaran Dalam Topik
Bulatan dalam kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan dua menggunakan Geoemetr‘s
Sketchpad. Unpublished master thesis, Faculty Education, University of
Technology, Malaysia.
Nurul Hidayah Lucy Bt Abdullah. (2005). The Effectiveness Of Using Dynamic
Geometry Software On Students‘ Achievement In Geometry. Unpublished
master‘s thesis, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Olive, J. (2000). Learning Geometry Intuitively With The Aid Of A New Computer
Tool: The Geometer‘s Sketchpad. The Mathematics Educator, 2(1), 1–5.
Diperoleh Aug 11, 2003, from
http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/DEPT/IME/Issues/v02n1/5olive.html.
Olkun, S. (2003). Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering
drawing activities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and
Learning, 3(1), 1-10.
Olkun, S., Sinoplu, N. B., & Deryakulu, D. (2005). Geometric explorations with
dynamic geometry applications based on Van Hiele levels. International
journal for mathematics teaching and learning, 6, 1-12.
O‘Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., & Jackson, B. (1991).

Heterogeneity and spatial hierarchies. In Ecological heterogeneity(pp. 85-96).

Springer New York.

Onyancha, R., & Kinsey, B. (2007). The effect of engineering major on spatial

ability improvements over the course of undergraduate studies. In 2007 37th

296

Annual Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge

Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports (pp. T1H-20). IEEE.
Özabaci, D. (2011). Bilgisayar Destekli Fen Bilgisi Öğretiminin Fen Bilgisi Dersine

Ilişkin Tutum , Bilişüstü Beceriler Ve Fen Bilgisi A Study On Computer
Based Science And Technology Education On Students ‘ Attitudes , Master
Learning Skills And Achivement, 37, 93–108.
Paivio (1986). Student Team Learning: A Practical Guide To Cooperative Learning.
Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Pandiscio, E & Orton, R.E. (1998). Geometry and Metacognition: An Analysis of
Piaget's and van Hiele's Perspectives. Focus on Learning Problems in
Mathematics, v20 n2-3 p78-87.
Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan
Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2015. Putrajaya: Kementerian
Pendidikan Malaysia.
Perk, P, Prestage, S. and Hewitt, D. (2002). ‗Does the software change the maths‘?
Micromath Spring: 28-31.
Peter F. Drucker (2006). The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the
Right Things Done. New York: Collins.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1956). The Child’s Conception of Space.
London:Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1955). Perceptual and cognitive (or operational) structures in the
development of the concept of space in the child. Acta Psychologica, 11, 41-46.
Piaget, J. (1956). The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.). NY:
International University Press.
Piaget, J. (1964). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge and Kegan
Paul. (Original work published in 1941)
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgement of the child. (M. Gabuin, Trans.). NY: Free
Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. (E. Duckworth, Trans.). NY: Columbia
University Press.
Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. (W. Mays, Trans.). NY: Basic
Books.
Piaget, J. (1975). Comments on mathematical education. Contemporary Education,
47(1), 5-11.

297

Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of
intellectual development. (T. Brown & K. J. Thampy, Trans.). Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.

Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. (E.
A. Lunzer, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Pilli, O., & Aksu, M. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the
achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in
North Cyprus. Computers & Education, 62, 62-71.

Polly, D. (2011). Developing Students‘ Higher-order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
through technology-rich tasks. Educational Technology, 51(4), 20–26.

Pop-Iliev, R., & Nokleby, S.B. (2005). Concurrent Approach to Teaching Concurrent
Design Engineering. Paper presented at the 2nd CDEN International
Conference on Design Education, Innovation, and Practice, Kananaskis,
Alberta, Canada

Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching
mathematics. Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics
education, 205-235.

Putten, S.V. (2008). Levels of Thought in Geometry of Pre-service Mathematics
Educators According to the Van Hiele Model. South Africa : University of
Pretoria. 324 pages.

Rafi, A., Anuar, K., Samad, A., Hayati, M., & Mahadzir, M. (2005). Improving
spatial ability using a Web-based virtual environment (WbVE). Automation
in Construction, 14, 707-715.

Rafi, A., Samsudin, K. A., & Said, C. S. (2008). Training in Spatial Visualization:
The Effects of Training Method and Gender. Educational Technology &
Society, 11(3), 127-140.

Renata, G. (2005). The Design of Narrative as an Immersive Simulation. In
Changing View: Worlds in Play: Proceeding of the Digital Games Research
Association 2005 meeting, Vancouver, June 16-20.

Rodriguez, A. (1995). Graphical visualization of missile–target air‐to‐air
engagements: An educational tool for designing and evaluating missile
guidance and control systems. Computer Applications in Engineering
Education, 3(1), 5-20.

Rohani Abd Wahab, Abdul Halim Abdullah, Mahani Mokhtar, Noor Azean Atan dan

298

Mohd Salleh Abu. (2016). A Case Study on Visual Spatial Skills and Level of

Geometric Thinking in Learning 3D Geometry. Man In India, 96 (2016), 489-

499, ISSN-0025-1569.

Rusch, M.L., Nusser, S.M., Miller, L.L., Batinov, G.I., & Whitney, K.C. (2012).

Spatial ability and map–based software applications. In: Proocedings of the

2012 International Conference on Advances in Computer – Human

Interactions, (pp. 35–40).

Rusell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction: A Guide to the Design,

Selection,Utilization and Evaluation of Modular Materlials. New York:

Burgess Publishing Company.

Rynhart, P. (2012). The van Hiele's Model of Geometric Thinking. Proactive Play.

http://proactiveplay. com/the-van-hieles-model-of-Geometric-

thinking/(accessed December 8, 2013).

Saifulnizam,C.I. (2007). Pembinaan Strategi Pembelajaran Menggunakan Perisian

Geoemetri interaktif. Unpublished master thesis, Faculty Education,

University of Technology, Malaysia.

Samuelsson, B. (2008). Arbetsskador I byggverksamhet 2007. Privat och offentlig

verksamhet. BCA 2008:2.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters

of'well-taught'mathematics courses. Educational psychologist, 23(2), 145-

166.

Schwartz,J.E. 2008. Elementary Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge:

Powerful Ideas for Teachers. Allyn & Bacon, an imprint of Pearson Education

Inc .72-74.

Schumann, H. 1991. Discovering geometry with a computer - using Cabri-géomètre.

Bromley, Kent, England: Chartwell-Bratt.

Sharifah AlwiahAlsagoff (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan

khas kepada modul pengajaran dan modul pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidik dan

Pendidikan, 3(1): 54-62. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Shafer, K. G. (2008). Learning To Teach With Technology Through An

Apprenticeship Model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher

Education, 8(1), 27–44.

Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial

ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal

299

study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604.
Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana

Membina Modul Latihan & Modul Akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti
Putra Malaysia.
Sidek Mohd Noah. (2005). Pegujian & Penilaian Dalam Kaunseling: Teori &
Aplikasi. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia

Sidek, R.Z.S., & Mohd Ariffin, S. (2011). Modul pembelajaran kendiri mata

pelajaran reka bentuk berbantu komputer Autocad 3D. UNSPECIFIED, 1-9.
Siti Suhaila Sutaji. (2015). Kesan penggunaan koswer multimedia animasi visual

terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran matematik . Doctoral
dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia:Tidak Diterbitkan.
Smaldino, Sharon E., Lowther, Deborah L. & Russell, James D. (2012). Instructional
technology and media for learning. Edisi ke 10. Boston: Pearson.

Strong, S. & Smith, R. (2002). Spatial Visualization: Fundamentals and Trends in

Engineering Graphics. Journal of Industrial Technology. 18
Sorby, S. A. (1999). Spatial abilities and their relationship to computer aided design

instruction. age, 4, 1.
Sorby, S. A., Leopold, C., & Gorska, R. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons of

gender differences in the spatial skills of engineering students. Journal of
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(3).
Sorby, S. A. (2006). Developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students.
Australasian Associations for Engineering Education. 2006: 679-688.
Sorby, S. A., & Bulleit, W. M. (2006). An engineer's guide to technical

communication. Longman Publishing Group.
Sorby, S. A., Drummer, T., Hungwe, K., Parolini, L., & Molzan, R. (2006). Preparing

for engineering studies: Improving the 3-D spatial skills of K-12
students. Science, 88(73), 65.
Sorby, S. A., Drummer, T., Hungwe, K., & Charlesworth, P. (2005). Developing 3-D
spatial visualization skills for non-engineering students. In Proceedings of the
2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
Exposition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-10).
Suhaila Abdulah. (2008). Kesan Kaedah Pengajaran Berbantukan Geometer‘s
SketchPad terhadap pencapaian dalam topik Transformasi Sarjana UTM:
Tidak Diterbitkan.

300

Sugiarta, Awandi Nopyan. (2007). Pengembangan Model Pengelolaan Program
Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Untuk Kemandirian Anak Jalanan Di Rumah
Singgah. Desertasi tidak diterbitkan. Bandung.

Sutton, K. J., & Williams, A. P. (2007). Spatial cognition and its implications for
design. International Association of Societies of Design Research, Hong
Kong, China.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA.
Thomson/Brooks/Cole.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics,
5th. Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Multivariate analysis of variance and
covariance. Using multivariate statistics, 3, 402-407.

Tan Tong Hock (2011) Assisting Primary School Children to Progress Through the
van Hiele‘s Levels of Geometry Thinking Using Google Sketch-Up (M.Ed.
(Maths).Tidak Diterbitkan.

Tan Tong Hock. (2016). Effects Of Van Hiele's Phases of Learning And Theory of
Geometry Thinking on Geometry Learning of Malaysian Year Five Students.
Tesis PhD UPM: Tidak diterbitkan.

Tay, B. L. (2003). A van Hiele-based instruction and its impact on the geometry
achievement of Form One students. M Ed. diss., University of Malaya.

Teoh, B. T., & Fong, S. F. (2005). The Effects of Geometer‘s Sketchpad and Graphic
Calculator in the Malaysian Mathematics Classroom. Malaysian Online
Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 82–96.

Tieng, P. G., & Eu, L. K. (2014). Improving Students' Van Hiele Level of Geometric
Thinking Using Geometer’s SketchPad. Malaysian Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 2(3), 20-31.

Thompson, E. (2006). Euclid, The Van Hiele Levels, And The Geometer‘s
Sketchpad. (MST thesis, Florita Atlantic University, 2006). Masters Abstracts

International, 44(06), 2529. Diperoleh pada February 2, 2007, from
http://wwwlib.umi.com/ dissertations/fullcit/1435803.
Trimble Navigation Limited. (2013). Diperoleh pada February 28, 2015 from
http://www.sketchup.com/

301

Trochim, W. M., Cabrera, D. A., Milstein, B., Gallagher, R. S., & Leischow, S. J.
(2006). Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public
health. American journal of public health, 96(3), 538-546.

Tsai, C.-H., & Yen, J.-C. 2013. The Development and Evaluation of a Kinect Sensor
Assisted Learning System on the Spatial Visualization Skills. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 991–998.
oi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.423

Tsutsumi, E. (2004). A Mental Cutting Test using drawings of intersections.Journal
for Geometry and Graphics, 8(1), 117-126.

Toptas, V., Celik, S., & Karaca, E. T. (2012). Improving 8th grades spatial thinking
abilities through a 3D modeling program. TOJET: The Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2).

Turgut, M., & Uygan, C. (2014). Spatial ability training for undergraduate
mathematics education students: designing tasks with SketchUp. The
Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 8(1), 53-65.

Turgut, M. (2007). Investigation of 6., 7. and 8. grade students‘ spatial ability. Master
of Science Dissertation, Izmir: Dokuz Eylül University.

Turgut, M. (2010). The effect of technology assisted linear algebra instruction on pre
– service primary mathematics teachers‘ spatial ability. Doctoral Dissertation,
Izmir: Dokuz Eylül University

Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels of Achievement in Secondary School Geometry.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago, Cognitive Development and
Achievement in Secondary School Geometry (CDASSG) Project.

van Belle, G. (2011). Statistical rules of thumb (Vol. 699). John Wiley & Sons.
Van de Walle, J., Karp, K, & Williams, J. M. B, (2010). Elementary & Middle

School Mathematics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
van Hiele, (1986). Structure And Insight, A Theory Of Mathematics Education.

Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1959/1984). Last article written by Dina van Hiele-Geldof

entitled: Didactics of geometry as learning process for adults. In D. Fuys, D.
Geddes and R. Tischler (eds.). School of Education, Brooklyn, NY: School of
Education, Brooklyn College, 215–233.
van Hiele, (1956). The Child’s Thought And Geometry, trans. by R. Tischler. Bulletin
de l‘association des professeurs de mathematique de l‘enseignment public,

302

38e annee N0 198, pp. 1-10.
van Hiele, (1957). The Problem Of Insight, In Connection With School-Children’s

Insight Into The Subject Matter Of Geometry. English summary (by P.M. van
Hiele) of De Problematiek van het Inzicht Gedemonstreed wan het Inzicht
von Schoolkindren in Meetkundeleerstof. Doctorial dissertation, University of
Utrecht.
Vojkuvkova, I., & Haviger, J.(2013).The van Hiele Geometry Test at Czech
Secondary School. WDS'13 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part I, 112–
115. ISBN 978-80-7378-250-4
Voyer, D. (1995). Effect of practice on laterality in a mental rotation task. Brain and
Cognition, 29(3), 326-335.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains:
Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its
importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817.
What kinds of files can I import into SketchUp? - SketchUp Help. (n.d.). Google
Help. Diperoleh pada February 28, 2015, from
http://support.google.com/sketchup/bin/answer.py?hl=en&
Widad, O., Rio, S.S., & Lee, M.F. (2006). E-engineering drawing (eed™) - a web
based system for teaching and learning engineering drawing for upper
secondary schools. The 6th SEAAIR annual conference; Langkawi,
September 5 -7.
Wiersma, D. (2000). Laser physics: The smallest random laser. Nature, 406(6792),
132-135.
Wilder, J.S. & Mason, J. (2005). Developing Thinking in Geometry. London: Paul
Chapman Educational Publishing.
Wu, D. B., & Ma, H. L. (2005, July). A study of the Geometric concepts of
elementary school students at van hiele level one. In Proceedings 29th
Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics
Education (Vol. 4, pp. 329-336).
Wu, D. & Ma, H. (2006). The distribution of Van Hiele levels of Geometric thinking
among 1st through 6th graders. In Novotna, J. et al, Proceedings of PME 30,
Vol 5, pp. 409-416. Prague: PME.
Yakubu, G.S. (1994). "Maximizing the Benefits of CAD Systems in Architectural
Education." In The Virtual Studio: Proceedings of the 12th European

303

Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design, 228.
eCAADe. Glasgow, Scotland: University of Strathclyde.
Yazdani, M. A. (2007). Correlation between Students‘ Level of Understanding
Geometry According to the van Hieles‘ Model and Students Achievement in
Plane Geometry. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Mathematics
Education, 2(2).
Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson Study (Jugyokenkyu) In Elementary School
Mathematics In Japan: A Case Study. Paper presented at the American
Educational Research Association (1999 Annual Meeting), Montreal, Canada.
Zaid Zainal Abidin. (2013). Mempertingkatkan Peringkat Berfikir Geometri Pelajar
Lepasan SMP Menggunakan Model Video Pembelajaran Geometri
Berasaskan Teori van Hiele. Tesis Phd UTM: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Zeljka, S.M. & Aleksandra, A. (2012). Spatial ability of students of mathematics
education in Croatia evaluated by the Mental Cutting Test. Ann. Math.
Inform, 40, 203-216.