RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 4 of 15 PART D. COURSE CONTENT - PRACTICAL 11. Remarks are mandatory for any criteria evaluated, and action taken as POOR/ UNSATISFACTORY 7 6 7 7 7 6 Training Schedule (TS) Content. Training Schedule (TS) Arrangement. Duration of the Course (Practical). COURSE CONTENT - PRACTICAL Poor Unsat. Sat. Good Excellent
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 5 of 15 PART E. COURSE DELIVERY - PRACTICAL 12. Remarks are mandatory for any criteria evaluated, and action taken as POOR/ UNSATISFACTORY 1 2 4 4 6 10 7 7 Instructors’ Presentation Skills. Knowledge of Instructors’ in the Subject Matter. Use of Teaching/Training Aids. COURSE DELIVERY - PRACTICAL Poor Unsat. Sat. Good Excellent
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 6 of 15 PART F: EXAMINATION 13. Remarks are mandatory for any criteria evaluated, and action taken as POOR/ UNSATISFACTORY 8 8 8 6 6 6 Conduct of the Exam as per Schedule. Use of Tool, Equipment and Meterial (TEM) for the Conduct of Exam. Examination question design related to subject content. EXAMINATION Examination Poor Examination Unsat. Examination Sat. Examination Good Examination Excellent
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 7 of 15 PART G. SUPPORT 14. a. Support Remarks are mandatory for any criteria evaluated, and action taken as POOR/ UNSATISFACTORY 5 6 8 6 8 6 Course Facilities. Messing and Accomodation. Transportation. SUPPORT Support Poor Support Unsat. Support Sat. Support Good Support Excellent
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 8 of 15 b. Financial ITEM ABM (BOG) ACTUAL EXPENDITURE REMARKS (a) (b) (c) (d) Guest Lecturer Wang Keraian Praktikal Ketenteraan Penginapan Sajian Sewaan Kenderaan Lawatan JPK/Persijilan Lain-Lain TOTAL (State reason in remarks column including the Ref No if (b) and (c) is different more or less. Use attachment if necessary)
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 9 of 15 PART H. COURSE ACHIEVEMENT 15. Course Results Average (in percentage): (Attach the name of all CP final result and course results). Serial: 4/20 Serial: 3/20 Serial: 2/20 Serial:1/20 No of CP: 10 No of CP: 10 No of CP: 10 No of CP: 10 Current Last Serial Theory 85 70 90 95 Practical 70 85 80 90 85 70 90 95 70 85 80 90 0 20 40 60 80 100 Result Course Serial COURSE RESULTS AVERAGE Theory Practical
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 10 of 15 PART I. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Recommendation might include: a. Further investigation of the findings. b. Maintaining the current curriculum as it stands. c. Decreasing/Increasing the number of course participants. d. Reviewing the whole curriculum. e. Changes in a specific training session in the curriculum. f. Improvement of the current curriculum to meet new demands. g. Creation of additional training course. 16. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION Signature: Date: Rank: Name:
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 11 of 15 REMARKS BY COMMANDING OFFICER / COMMANDANT 17. Signature: Date: Rank: Name:
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 12 of 15 MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA RECORD OF EOCR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE INSTITUT PENERBANGAN DUA (INSPEN 2) COURSE NAME & SERIAL BASIC HELICOPTER FLYING COURSE SERIAL 60/18 NO OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS INITIAL STRENGTH 18 GRADUATED 15 COURSE START DATE AS PER PROSPECTUS 02 NOV 2018 ACTUAL 02 NOV 2018 COURSE END DATE AS PER PROSPECTUS 14 JAN 2020 ACTUAL 02 NOV 2018 COURSE RESULTS AVERAGE IN PERCENTAGE (%) THEORY: 93.17% PRACTICAL: 70.66% ISSUES TO BE HIGHLIGHTED FROM COURSE EVALUATION AND EXECUTIVE REMARKS REMARKS BY SO 1 TRAINING Signature: Date: Rank: Name: REMARKS BY SO 1 CURRICULUM Signature: Date: Rank: Name: Note: Prepared by MPPLU
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 13 of 15 REMARKS BY PENGARAH BANTUAN Signature: Date: Rank: Name: Note: Prepared by MPPLU
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 14 of 15 REMARKS BY PENGARAH LATIHAN Signature: Date: Rank: Name: Note: Prepared by MPPLU
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 3.1F - 15 of 15 REMARKS BY SO 2 R&D Signature: Date: Rank: Name: Note: Prepared by MPPLU
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA COMMAND TRAINING INSTRUCTIONS PART 4 CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.1 - 1 of 2 MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA COMMAND TRAINING INSTRUCTIONS PART 4 CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION 1. All curricula are to be designed and developed following Chapter 7 of the MTPP. This chapter describes the management aspect of curriculum development, responsibilities and duties of MPPLU as well as a training institute. It provides guidelines for unit Training Design and Development Officer (TDDO) to assimilate the course curriculum. DEFINITION 2. Duration. The time taken to conduct a course or a module. This duration may be expressed in weeks, days and hours depending on the followings: a. Course Duration. The time taken to conduct a course. This duration is expressed in weeks. If a course is less than a week, the duration is to be expressed in days. (e.g. 24 weeks, six (6) days). b. Module Duration. The time taken to complete a module which includes theory lessons, practical lessons and assessment sessions without calculating the instructorto-CP ratio. It is expressed in hours. 3. Course Period. The duration of a single session/lesson where training shall be conducted. One course period is one (1.0) hour inclusive of a 10-minute break. It is also known as Training Session. 4. Instructional Hours. The contact hours between the instructor and CP during theory lessons, practical lessons and assessment sessions. This will include the calculation of instructor-to-CP ratio times the duration of a single training session (number of instructors needed for a training session times training session duration). RMAF curriculum is developed based on 28.0 instructional hours a week. Instructional hours for individual instructors ideally should not exceed 6.0 hours in a day. However, variations can occur to accommodate theoretical/field/practical training. 5. Minor Amendment. CO is permitted to make changes to the curriculum content in exception for what has been stipulated as a major amendment. However, these changes shall be forwarded to MPPLU for approval by Ketua Staf. 6. Major Amendment. Any major amendment of the curriculum needs to be tabled in LKKPLU for approval, following the standard procedure laid down in Annex B to Part 4, Chapter 3 of this document. Changing any ONE of the following are considered a major amendment: a. Course Training Outcomes (CTO). b. Training Level (TL).
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.1 - 2 of 2 c. Course duration. d. Course resource requirement which will incur cost variation. 7. Short Course. Course duration is less than four (4.0) weeks. 8. Long Course. Course duration that is more than four (4.0) weeks.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.2 - 1 of 5 MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA COMMAND TRAINING INSTRUCTIONS PART 4 CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 2 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Curricula for training conducted by training institute under MPPLU requires approval from the BOG. MPPLU, however, is the overall custodian of all the curricula are being developed. The improvement and amendment of these curricula are according to the development of training, assets, human capital and financial standing of the RMAF. 2. All training institutes under MPPLU must keep monitoring upon the rapid changes IOT generate an ever ready and steady flow of competent workforce through curricula. Understanding the roles and responsibilities will ensure a consistent and efficient workflow within the MPPLU establishment. MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA 3. MPPLU is to conduct curriculum development/review workshop on request from the Training Analysis and Design Authority based on processes stipulated in the MTPP. 4. Authority to Approve Curriculum. a. MPPLU is the Training Development Authority for all curriculum within its command. b. MPPLU is also responsible for Training Staff Development programs in the training institute. c. Every newly developed curriculum requires LPPLU-Curriculum approval before being presented to the BOG for endorsement. d. Curriculum review will only require the approval of LPPLU-Curriculum. 5. Composition of LPPLU-Curriculum. LPPLU-Curriculum comprises of the following: a. Panglima Pendidikan dan Latihan Udara as Chairman. b. Ketua Staf/Pengarah Latihan as permanent member. c. Commanding Officer/Commandant/Head of School as a permanent member. d. PS 1 Kurikulum MPPLU as permanent member. e. Unit TDDO as a permanent member - responsible for presenting the curriculum at the LPPLU. f. PS 2 Kurikulum MPPLU (of the applicable cell) as Secretary.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.2 - 2 of 5 Note: The Board’s Chairman, on his/her discretion, may also call for any of the MPPLU/institute’s executives/staff as members in attendance. 6. LPPLU-Curriculum Responsibilities. The LPPLU-Curriculum is responsible for: a. Vetting new curriculum (Sections 1 to 6). b. Approve new curriculum (Sections 1 to 6). c. Approve reviewed curriculum (Sections 1 to 6). d. Revalidate a reviewed curriculum - when an extension of validity is required. 7. Authority to Conduct Courses. All newly developed curriculum require approval from the LKKPLU. The LKKPLU is responsible for ensuring the training institute is ready to conduct the new course. During the board, the Training Design Working Group (TDWG) is to present Sect 1 to Sect 5 for approval of the interim curriculum to conduct the first course. Upon completion of the course and external evaluation, if there is found to be no major amendment required, then the interim curriculum will be presented to the LPPLUCurriculum for approval. 8. Composition of LKKPLU. The LKKPLU is composed of the following: a. Ketua Staf as Chairman. b. Pengarah Latihan as permanent member. c. Commanding Officer/Commandant/Head of School as a permanent member. d. PS 1 Kurikulum as permanent member. e. Unit TDDO as a permanent member - responsible for presenting the curriculum at the LKKPLU. f. PS 1 Penyelidikan MTU-BSM (Latih) as member. g. PS 2 R&D MPPLU as member. h. PS 2 Kurikulum MPPLU (of the applicable cell) as Secretary. 9. LKKPLU Responsibilities. The LKKPLU is responsible for: a. Vetting the interim curriculum (Sections 1 to 5). b. Vetting training support documents, such as course notes, workbooks and other relevant course material. c. Provide authorization to conduct the trial course. 10. Before any curriculum (new or reviewed) can be implemented, it is to be vetted and approved through LKKPLU/LPPLU-Curriculum.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.2 - 3 of 5 11. Duty of the MPPLU Cawang Kurikulum. The MPPLU Cawang Kurikulum is responsible for the following functions: a. Develop training requirements based on the Competency Standards (CS) produced by Trade Master for each trade. b. Prepare Training Specification, training program and develop curriculum based on training needs in line with service/trade requirements. The new curriculum that involves changes in existing policies needs to be approved by JPPTU before being developed. c. Conduct analysis of the effectiveness of curriculum from all training aspects through the data received from the End of Course Report (EOCR), External Evaluation Report and GL Performance Report. d. Determine the validity period of all curricula in holding based on board approval to be used by training institutes. e. Establish TDWG to develop a draft curriculum (Section 1 to 5). f. Collaborate with Training Analysis Authority and Training Design in developing training packages. g. Perform annual compliance checks on the training cycle process and curriculum management in training institutions. h. Coordinate with training institutions on new curriculum development/ curriculum review until approval by LKKPLU/LPPLU-Curriculum. i. Maintain curriculum databases (hardcopy and softcopy) in the Management Information Room (MIR). j. Conduct quarterly internal audits at MIR. k. Perform periodic analysis on training methodology based on RMAF policies and procedures. l. Monitor yearly Anggaran Belanjawan Mengurus (ABM) preparation as stipulated in each curriculum Section 1 and 3. m. Monitor Guest Lecturer Approval Form (GLAF) as a basis for curriculum review. n. Monitor training institutes request to conduct the course if the CP number is below or above as stipulated in the curriculum Section 1. o. Monitor training institutes request extension of course duration. p. Carry out accreditation programs whenever appropriate. q. Maintain a Competency Standard (CS) and Training Specification database (hardcopy and softcopy) involving all curriculum in MIR. r. Conduct staff visit to training institute at least once a year to scrutinize curriculum management.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.2 - 4 of 5 TRAINING INSTITUTE 12. Curriculum Cell. The training institute is to have an established curriculum cell. This cell is headed by TDDO (not necessarily officer), who is responsible for managing the cell. TDDO is responsible for: a. Participate in the development of new curriculum. b. Develop and review course notes and training packages. c. Review the existing curriculum (Sections 1 to 6). d. Participate in the internal evaluation. e. Conduct external evaluation. f. Lead the course review session. g. Maintain records concerning curriculum management. h. Provides inputs and updates to MPPLU Cawang Kurikulum and MTU-BSM (Latih) concerning the minor/major amendment of the curriculum. i. Request approval from KS MPPLU/PPLU regarding minor/major amendment should there be the need to do so. 13. Documentation. Training related documents that are to be readily available at the institute Curriculum Cell are as follows: a. All Curricula. b. Course Material (training note, lesson plan, PowerPoint). c. MTPP. d. RMAF Training Doctrine. e. CTI. f. Perintah Tetap Unit. g. UTI. h. Unit Standing Orders (USO). i. Endorsed Occupational Specification (OS)/Competency Standard (CS) and Training Specification of every curriculum. j. LPPLU/LKKPLU approval signal. k. EOCR. l. External Evaluation planning and report. m. Guest Lecturer/Instructor Performance Form (GLPF).
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.2 - 5 of 5 n. Personnel instructional qualifications. o. List of curriculum and status chart. p. External Evaluation chart. q. Any other relevant documents, work process and chart (i.e., work process for Curriculum Development, Curriculum Cell Organisation chart etc.). Work processes, charts and updated information are to be displayed in the Curriculum Cell. 14. Safe Keeping. Classified documents, documents, and records related to curriculum management are to be kept in a locked, appropriate and secured cabinet and the access shall be controlled by the TDDO. 15. TDDO Qualification. Training institute TDDO must have attended the Training Manager Course (TMC) or equivalent. 16. Assistant TDDO Qualification. Training institute Assistant TDDO must have at least one (1) of the following training/qualifications: a. Attended Senior Trainer Course (STC)/Flying Instructor Course (FIC)/Tactical Flying Instructor Course (TFIC). b. Attended Training Manager Course (TMC) or equivalent.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3 - 1 of 3 MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA COMMAND TRAINING INSTRUCTIONS PART 4 CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 3 CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT 1. Training conducted under MPPLU must be based on the interim and approved curriculum. Curriculum is the product of trade’s training requirement based on a thorough training analysis conducted by respective Trade Master’s Compentency Standard Working Group (CSWG) which then approved by AKS Sumber Manusia. Upon receiving a complete Competency Standard and Training Specification, MPPLU shall form up a Training Development Working Group (TDWG) to further scrutinise the development of Section 1 to 5 an interim curriculum. 2. Four (4) types of curriculums are as follows: a. Interim Curriculum. (1) Produced by TDWG for training institute and approved by KS MPPLU in LKKPLU to conduct a trial course. (2) If no major amendment required and positive feedback gained from the first external evaluation on the 1st trial course, it will enable the interim curriculum to be presented in LPPLU. b. New Curriculum. (1) An interim curriculum which has undergone a trial course and External Evaluation and subsequently approved in LPPLU-Curriculum. (2) Along with the courses, a curriculum review must be done should there be any major amendment. Once a new curriculum had undergone a major amendment, it is now known as reviewed curriculum. c. Reviewed Curriculum. (1) A curriculum which has been undergone a major amendment comparable to its previous new curriculum or master curriculum. (2) Use to conduct courses with a few more refining processes, if necessary, until BOG is endorsing it as master curriculum. d. Master Curriculum. BOG endorsed Competency Standard (CS) and curriculum. INTERIM CURRICULUM 3. Trial Course. The process flow on the design and development of an interim curriculum is as per Annex A to this chapter.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3 - 2 of 3 4. Curriculum Validity. The validity is as follows: a. For courses where the duration is a year or less, the validity period is two (2) years from the approval date. b. For courses where the duration is more than one (1) year, the validity period is the duration of the course plus one (1) year (and rounded up to the nearest year). (Eg: for courses duration of one (1) year and three (3) months, the validity period will be three (3) years, and for courses three (3) years validity period is four (4) years). c. LPPLU and LKKPLU have the authority to extend the validity of the curriculum. However, each extension shall not exceed a period, as stated in Para 4.a. and b. The SO 2 Curriculum representing a training institute and SO 1 Curriculum is responsible for the process as follows: (1) Verify the Competency Standard (CS) and curriculum Section 1 to Section 6 following MTPP and CTI. (2) Presenting the curriculum at the LPPLU/LKKPLU. 5. Documents and form to be prepared in the process are as follows: a. EOCR. b. External Evaluation Report. c. Approved LPPLU/LKKPLU Form. d. New LPPLU/LKKPLU Form. e. Letter/Signal from MTU-BSM (Penyelidikan) stating no amendment to CS/Training Specification in the curriculum involved. f. PS 2 Kurikulum MPPLU (of the applicable cell) as Secretary. 6. LPPLU/LKKPLU Form as per Annex C and D to this chapter. NEW CURRICULUM 7. Design a New Curriculum. Curriculum is to be designed based on the approved Competency Standard (CS). 8. Composition of CSWG. The composition of CSWG is dependable on the type and intended end state of the curriculum. CSWG is primarily responsible for developing and reviewing the constituent workplace competencies which may documented within CS. 9. Develop a New Curriculum. To develop a new curriculum, MPPLU is to establish TDWG to carry out the following tasks: a. Develop curriculum. b. Develop CP material. c. Develop assessment procedures.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3 - 3 of 3 d. Develop assessment tools. e. Develop the Instructor Guide. f. Evaluate training. 10. Composition of TDWG. The members of the TDWG are as follows: a. Pengarah Latihan as Chairman. b. Commanding Officer/Head of School as member. c. PS 1 Kurikulum as permanent member. d. PS 1 Penyelidikan MTU-BSM (Latih) as member. e. PS 2 Kurikulum (respective training institute) as member. f. PS 2 R&D as member. g. TDDO as permanent member. h. Representative from SME, training institute and/or operational unit (respective trade) as member. CURRICULUM REVIEW 11. Review Existing Curriculum. MPPLU Curriculum Department is responsible for carrying out reviews of all existing curricula. The process flow for curriculum review is as per Annex B to this chapter. Curriculum is to be reviewed within a (1) month before the next due review date. 12. The LPPLU-Curriculum has the authority to instruct the review of the specific curriculum under the following circumstances: a. There is a change in CS. b. When instructed by higher authority.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3A - 1 of 1 PART 4 ANNEX A TO CHAPTER 3 PROCESS FLOW FOR DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW CURRICULUM
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3B - 1 of 1 PART 4 ANNEX B TO CHAPTER 3 PROCESS FLOW FOR CURRICULUM REVIEW
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3C - 1 of 2 PART 4 ANNEX C TO CHAPTER 3 LPPLU FORM LEMBAGA PANGLIMA PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA (LPPLU) KURIKULUM AIR COMBAT INDUCTION (ACIC) SEKOLAH KPU No. Siri 235/21 Tarikh 22 Jan 21 (Jumaat) Masa (H) 1000H - 1200H Tempat Bersidang Bilik Mesyuarat MPPLU Kursus Percubaan (No. Siri Kursus) 1. Senarai Kehadiran Ahli LPPLU. Bil. No, Pkt, Nama Jawatan Status Keahlian Catatan 1. Mej Jen Mohd Shahada bin Ismail TUDM PPLU Ahli Tetap Pengerusi 2. Kol Mohd Shahfreen bin Baba TUDM Pengarah Latihan Ahli Tetap 3. Mej Mohd Fauzi bin Omar TUDM Ketua Sekolah KPU Ahli Tetap Ketua TEWG 4. Mej Richard a/l Bizikumarin TUDM PS 1 Kurikulum Ahli Tetap 5. Mej Muhammad Nazmy bin Zainal TUDM PS 2 R&D Turut Hadir 6. Mej Zahid bin Kader TUDM PS 2 Latih D Turut Hadir Setiausaha 7. Kapt Mohd Zulhusni bin Mohammad Roslan TUDM TDDO Sekolah KPU Ahli Tetap 2. Status Occupational Area Structure (OAS) berkaitan. Status OS Catatan / Kuasa Telah mendapat kelulusan Trade Master P Siap dibangunkan tetapi belum mendapat kelulusan Dalam proses pembangunan/ semakan Tidak lengkap/tidak dibangunkan Rujuk NOSS berkaitan P Tiada NOSS yang berkenaan
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3C - 2 of 2 3. Status Keseluruhan Kurikulum. Seksyen Status Catatan Lengkap Tidak Lengkap Perlu Semakan 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 P 4. Senarai Perubahan/Penambahbaikan Kurikulum (Jika ada). Bil. Perubahan/Penambahbaikan Justifikasi/Sebab 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. Senarai Teguran/Perubahan Berdasarkan Semakan oleh LPPLU. Bil. Teguran/Perubahan/Pembetulan Tarikh/Tempoh Perlu Disiapkan 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Keputusan LPPLU-Kurikulum. Keputusan Diluluskan P Lulus Bersyarat Tidak Diluluskan 7. Tandatangan. Pengerusi Setiausaha Tandatangan Tarikh Jan 21 Jan 21
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3D - 1 of 2 PART 4 ANNEX D TO CHAPTER 3 LKKPLU FORM LEMBAGA KECIL KURIKULUM PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA (LPPLU) KURIKULUM GBAD WEAPON SYSTEM TECHNICIAN COURSE (GBAD) No. Siri 235/21 Tarikh 22 Jan 21 (Jumaat) Masa (H) 1000H - 1200H Tempat Bersidang Bilik Mesyuarat MPPLU Kursus Percubaan (No. Siri Kursus) 1. Senarai Kehadiran Ahli LKKPLU. Bil. No, Pkt, Nama Jawatan Status Keahlian Catatan 1. Brig Jen Abdul Halim Bin Othman TUDM KS MPPLU Ahli Tetap Pengerusi 2. Kol Mohd Shahfreen bin Baba TUDM Pengarah Latihan Ahli Tetap 3. Mej Mohd Fauzi bin Omar TUDM Ketua Sekolah KPU Ahli Tetap Ketua TEWG 4. Mej Richard a/l Bizikumarin TUDM PS 1 Kurikulum Ahli Tetap 5. Mej Mazura Binti Mahamood TUDM TDDO Sekolah KPU Ahli Tetap 6. Mej Muhammad Nazmy bin Zainal TUDM PS 2 R&D Turut Hadir 7. Mej Zahid bin Kader TUDM PS 2 Latih D Turut Hadir Setiausaha 2. Status Occupational Area Structure (OAS) berkaitan. Status OS Catatan / Kuasa Telah mendapat kelulusan Trade Master P Siap dibangunkan tetapi belum mendapat kelulusan Dalam proses pembangunan/ semakan Tidak lengkap/tidak dibangunkan Rujuk NOSS berkaitan P
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.3D - 2 of 2 3. Status Keseluruhan Kurikulum. Seksyen Status Catatan Lengkap Tidak Lengkap Perlu Semakan 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 P 4. Senarai Perubahan/Penambahbaikan Kurikulum (Jika ada). Bil. Perubahan/Penambahbaikan Justifikasi/Sebab 1. Penambahbaikan kepada CTO Redundancy to Curriculum BWDC 2. Tempoh masa berkursus berkurangan Requirement by Trade Master 3. Perubahan kepada kos Redundancy to Curriculum BWDC 4. Sentry GBAD Operation Management (SGOM) embedded into new curriculum Keperluan kepada operasi semasa 5. 5. Senarai Teguran/Perubahan Berdasarkan Semakan oleh LKKPLU. Bil. Teguran/Perubahan/Pembetulan Tarikh/Tempoh Perlu Disiapkan 1. Review Training Level Seksyen 1 4 Feb 21 2. Jumlah Non-Instructional Hours Seksyen 3 4 Feb 21 3. Travel & Subsistence di dalam Seksyen 3 4 Feb 21 4. Course Cost di dalam Seksyen 3 4 Feb 21 5. 6. Keputusan LKKPLU. Keputusan Diluluskan Lulus Bersyarat P Tidak Diluluskan 7. Tandatangan. Pengerusi Setiausaha Tandatangan Tarikh Jan 21 Jan 21
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4 - 1 of 2 MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA COMMAND TRAINING INSTRUCTIONS PART 4 CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 4 EVALUATION 1. In ensuring the continuous improvement of RMAF training, evaluations are to be carried out according to Chapter 13 of the MTPP. INTERNAL EVALUATION 2. The responsibility of conducting Internal Evaluations lies with the Training Conduct Authority. They are responsible for planning, conduct, and review the evaluation activities. Internal evaluations are to be part of the agenda during the post-course meeting. Any minor changes in the curriculum, course support, management and administration are to be dealt with and appropriately recorded as part of the continuous improvement process. Sources of internal evaluations are as follows: a. Assessment results. b. Instructor’s feedback. c. CP feedback. d. Support staff feedback. 3. Standard Internal Evaluation Form as per Annex A to this chapter. 4. It is to be completed by a minimum number of 30 CP if there are more than 30 participants. If the number of CP is below 30, then all CP are required to complete the form. 5. To fully comprehend the issue/s highlighted in the comments/recommendation section of the Internal Evaluation Form, the training institute are encouraged to carry out an Internal Evaluation Session whenever possible. It is not compulsory to be done, but it is done under the discretion of the training institute. 6. The outcomes of internal evaluations are to be incorporated into the EOCR IAW the format in Annex F to Part 3 Chapter 1. EXTERNAL EVALUATION 7. The purpose of external evaluation is as follows: a. To check the validity of the CTO. b. To confirm the behavioural change as a result of training. 8. Methods of carrying out an external evaluation are detailed in Chapter 13 of the MTPP. The authority to carry out external evaluation is the training institute that conducts the training and submits the evaluation report to the Curriculum Department MPPLU and MTU-BSM (Latih).
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4 - 2 of 2 9. Training institute is to plan and carry out external evaluations on all training conducted in its training institute for every course between six (6) to twelve (12) months after completion of the course. 10. CO may determine the frequency at which external evaluations are to be conducted based on the following factors: a. Practicality. b. Type of course. c. Frequency of the course. d. Duration of the course. 11. An external evaluation is to be conducted by the Training Conduct Authority concerned on course graduates to assess the level of compliance Para 7.a and b. to this chapter with workplace requirements and measuring the degree to which transfer of training to the workplace has occurred. Candidates for external evaluation must have completed the course more than six (6) months but less than twelve (12) months from the day of graduation. 12. The training institute must conduct an external evaluation to complete the training cycle. a. The performance feedback from the graduate’s supervisor at the immediate workplace is done using the External Evaluation Form - Supervisor as per Annex B to this chapter. b. The feedback from the graduate him/herself regarding the utilisation of knowledge and skill acquired previously at training institute using the External Evaluation Form - Graduate as per Annex C to this chapter. c. The External Evaluation Forms are to be kept in the training institute for record and reference purposes. d. Respond rate of at least 70% must be achieved to validate the External Evaluation report (when applicable). 13. The summary of statistics compiled from the External Evaluation Form is to be transcribed to the template External Evaluation Report (EVR) form as per Annex D to this chapter. The report is to be submitted to MPPLU Curriculum Department and MTUBSM (Latih) not later than 30 working days after completion of the evaluation. 14. Training categories required external evaluation as per Annex E to this chapter.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4A - 1 of 4 PART 4 ANNEX A TO CHAPTER 4 INTERNAL EVALUATION FORM COURSE TITLE : SERIAL : DATE : COORDINATOR : NO OF PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE EVALUATION : EVALUATION SCALE EVALUATION SCALE POOR 1 UNSATISFACTORY 2 SATISFACTORY 3 GOOD 4 EXCELLENT 5 NOT APPLICABLE N/A NOTE: Evaluations must be clear, objective and supported by reasons. Suggestions for improvement are most welcome. Remark is mandatory for any criteria evaluated as Poor/Excellent. Service No: Service No: Rank: Rank: Name: Name: Appointment: Course Leader
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4A - 2 of 4 1. COURSE CONTENT - THEORY NO. CRITERIA MARKS COMMENTS a. Training Schedule (TS) Content. b. Training Schedule (TS) Arrangement. c. Duration of the Course (Theory). 2. COURSE CONTENT - PRACTICAL NO. CRITERIA MARKS COMMENTS a. Training Schedule (TS) Content. b. Training Schedule (TS) Arrangement. c. Duration of the Course (Practical). 3. COURSE DELIVERY - PRACTICAL NO. CRITERIA MARKS COMMENTS a. Instructors’ Presentation Skills. b. Knowledge of Instructor in the Subject matter. c. Use of Teaching/Training Aids. 4. EXAMINATION NO. CRITERIA MARKS COMMENTS a. Conduct of the Exam as per schedule. b. Use of Tool, Equipment and Material (TEM) for the Conduct of Exam. c. Examination question design related to subject content.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4A - 3 of 4 5. SUPPORT NO. CRITERIA MARKS COMMENTS a. Course Facilities. b. Messing and Accommodation. c. Transportation. 6. Give a statement or suggestion to the following statements: a. State the weakness of the course as a whole (if any). b. State suggestion to improve the course (if any).
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4A - 4 of 4 c. Any other remarks.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4B - 1 of 4 PART 4 ANNEX B TO CHAPTER 4 EXTERNAL EVALUATION FORM SUPERVISOR Basic Trainer Course Supervisor Survey COURSE VALIDATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SUPERVISOR BASIC TRAINER COURSE INTRODUCTION 1. Warm greetings to all graduates of the Institut Kepimpinan dan Pengurusan (INSKEP). Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to you for participating in the Course Validation Questionnaire by answering all questions truthfully and sincerely. The time and effort that you have sacrificed is important because as this information is crucial in assisting us in designing and developing a better-quality training to meet the changing needs of the RMAF. I would like to assure that all the information that you give will be treated strictly confidential and will be thoroughly investigated. 2. This Course Validation Questionnaire is divided into 2 parts. Part A is the set questionnaire to obtain the relevant information regarding the course’s Course Training Outcome (CTO). Part B focuses on the outcome of the graduate in performing their duties in workplaces. Our main aim here to gauge any discrepancy exist between what skill is needed at the workplace and what skill is acquired at INSKEP. Our next action will depend on the results of the questionnaire. If no discrepancy is found, our training (curriculum) is valid and therefore require no amendment. However, if significant amount of discrepancy found, amendments will be carried out to fill up the gap between what is needed at workplace and the training required. 3. There are many factors that can influence the outcome of this validation process and one of them is the additional training the graduate received after completing the course at INSKEP. The additional training received could accidentally fill up the training gap that this validation process tries to highlight. Therefore, it is very important that this validation process should be carried out appropriately as soon as the trainees graduated from INSKEP. 4. Once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time and effort to complete this Course Validation Questionnaire. Please take your time to answer all the questions and remember that your feedback could have an effect for the future of the RMAF Training System. NURUL AMIR BIN OTHMAN Lt Kol TUDM Commander Officer
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4B - 2 of 4 Basic Trainer Course Supervisor Survey EXTERNAL EVALUATION AUDITS FOR BASIC TRAINER COURSE (SUPERVISOR) FOR YEAR 2020 Please sign (P) where applicable Introduction: 1. The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain insights and opinions regarding the effectiveness of courses conducted by this institute. 2. On the feedback provided by you, will assist the institute improve the contents of the course. The cooperation given is very much appreciated. 3. This questionnaire contains 2 parts. You will be required to respond: a. Results after the course/Course Training Outcomes (CTO) course and how the course achievement in providing trainees to perform the duties. b. Giving a view or opinion related to the exercises implemented can help you with the current task. 4. All information provided is CONFIDENTIAL. Your name will be used for review and reference purposes only for this study. Supervisor Information Rank: Name: Service Number: Unit: Graduate Attend Course Serial: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4B - 3 of 4 Basic Trainer Course Supervisor Survey EXTERNAL EVALUATION AUDITS FOR BASIC TRAINER COURSE (SUPERVISOR) FOR YEAR 2020 *These represents to response of personnel PART A CTO 1 Implement CBTA. CTO 2 Prepare Training Environment. CTO 3 Prepare Teaching and Training Aids. CTO 4 Conduct Training. CTO 5 Organize assessment. CTO 6 Administer Trainee Support Services. 1. Has the graduate performed the task? CTO 1 CTO 2 CTO 3 CTO 4 CTO 5 CTO 6 Often Sometime Never *If candidate tick under the answer Sometime/Never, state the reason.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4B - 4 of 4 2. Was the level of training adequate for the graduate to perform the task? CTO 1 CTO 2 CTO 3 CTO 4 CTO 5 CTO 6 About right Under trained Over trained *If candidate tick under the answer Under trained/Over trained, state the reason. PART B 1. List any task which you do, that were not covered for the Basic Trainer Course. Thank you for your participation.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4C - 1 of 4 PART 4 ANNEX C TO CHAPTER 4 EXTERNAL EVALUATION FORM GRADUATE Basic Trainer Course Graduate Survey COURSE VALIDATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GRADUATE BASIC TRAINER COURSE INTRODUCTION 1. Warm greetings to all graduates of the Institut Kepimpinan dan Pengurusan (INSKEP). Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to you for participating in the Course Validation Questionnaire by answering all questions truthfully and sincerely. The time and effort that you have sacrificed is important because as this information is crucial in assisting us in designing and developing a better-quality training to meet the changing needs of the RMAF. I would like to assure that all the information that you give will be treated strictly confidential and will be thoroughly investigated. 2. This Course Validation Questionnaire is divided into 2 parts. Part A is the set questionnaire to obtain the relevant information regarding the course’s Course Training Outcome (CTO). Part B focuses on the outcome of the graduate in performing their duties in workplaces. Our main aim here to gauge any discrepancy exist between what skill is needed at the workplace and what skill is acquired at INSKEP. Our next action will depend on the results of the questionnaire. If no discrepancy is found, our training (curriculum) is valid and therefore require no amendment. However, if significant amount of discrepancy found, amendments will be carried out to fill up the gap between what is needed at workplace and the training required. 3. There are many factors that can influence the outcome of this validation process and one of them is the additional training the graduate received after completing the course at INSKEP. The additional training received could accidentally fill up the training gap that this validation process tries to highlight. Therefore, it is very important that this validation process should be carried out appropriately as soon as the trainees graduated from INSKEP. 4. Once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time and effort to complete this Course Validation Questionnaire. Please take your time to answer all the questions and remember that your feedback could have an effect for the future of the RMAF Training System. NURUL AMIR BIN OTHMAN Lt Kol TUDM Commander Officer
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4C - 2 of 4 Basic Trainer Course Graduate Survey EXTERNAL EVALUATION AUDITS FOR BASIC TRAINER COURSE (GRADUATE) FOR YEAR 2020 Please sign (P) where applicable Introduction: 1. The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain insights and opinions regarding the effectiveness of courses conducted by this institute. 2. On the feedback provided by you, will assist the institute improve the contents of the course. The cooperation given is very much appreciated. 3. This questionnaire contains 2 parts. You will be required to respond: a. Results after the course/Course Training Outcomes (CTO) course and how the course achievement in providing trainees to perform the duties. b. Giving a view or opinion related to the exercises implemented can help you with the current task. 4. All information provided is CONFIDENTIAL. Your name will be used for review and reference purposes only for this study. Supervisor Information Rank: Name: Service Number: Unit: Course End Date: Course Serial:
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4C - 3 of 4 Basic Trainer Course Graduate Survey EXTERNAL EVALUATION AUDITS FOR BASIC TRAINER COURSE (GRADUATE) FOR YEAR 2020 *These represents to response of personnel PART A CTO 1 Implement CBTA. CTO 2 Prepare Training Environment. CTO 3 Prepare Teaching and Training Aids. CTO 4 Conduct Training. CTO 5 Organize assessment. CTO 6 Administer Trainee Support Services. 1. Has the graduate performed the task? CTO 1 CTO 2 CTO 3 CTO 4 CTO 5 CTO 6 Often Sometime Never *If candidate tick under the answer Sometime/Never, state the reason.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4C - 4 of 4 2. Was the level of training adequate for the graduate to perform the task? CTO 1 CTO 2 CTO 3 CTO 4 CTO 5 CTO 6 About right Under trained Over trained *If candidate tick under the answer Under trained/Over trained, state the reason. PART B 1. List any task which you do, that were not covered for the Basic Trainer Course. Thank you for your participation.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4D - 1 of 3 PART 4 ANNEX D TO CHAPTER 4 EXTERNAL EVALUATION REPORT NAME OF TRAINING INSTITUTE EXTERNAL EVALUATION REPORT ON (COURSE NAME) INTRODUCTION 1. State the course that has been conducted and the number of participants which is eligible for external evaluation (6 to 12 months after the course ended). AIM 2. To state the purpose or objective of the evaluation about the training conducted, course curriculum and job specification/requirement. BACKGROUND 3. State the requirement of performing the evaluation based on publication reference. Explain briefly why the evaluation is needed for the particular course (participants) and the impact towards the conduct and if relevant, the design of the course. The team involved and the venue of the evaluation must also be mentioned in this section. METHODOLOGY 4. Describe the methods and data sources. Methods and data sources used in the evaluation should be fully described in the evaluation report. It can either be a Quantitative, Qualitative or a combination of both methods and/or data source. 5. Quantitative methods and data sources include: a. Behaviour Observation Checklist. b. Inventory Checklist. c. Judgemental Rating. d. Knowledge Assessments. e. Opinion Survey. f. Performance Assessment. g. Survey Questionnaire (as included/attached). h. Self-Rating. i. Time Series Analysis. 6. Qualitative methods and data sources include: a. Interviews.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4D - 2 of 3 b. Panels and Hearings. c. Records Analysis. d. Logs and Journals. e. Simulations. f. Case Studies and Observations. 7. Respond rate. The targeted population and sample size for the evaluation must be determined in the report. The respond rate must be at least 70% out of the total population to ensure the accuracy of the evaluation. The whole target population is the best, but if it becomes impracticable or unnecessary, the survey should be restricted to a sample. RESULT AND ANALYSIS 8. To provide the number/percentage of participating respondents compared to the targeted population. 9. To provide a summary of the methodology used during the evaluation (Quantitative/Qualitative/Combination of both). 10. To summarize the feedback from the evaluation either in the form of number, percentage or information captured. 11. To explain the outcome of the evaluation conducted based on the analysis carried out from the result. The analysis needs to be represented in a table or graphical chart with a brief explanation. 12. This section should also discuss the following matters based on theanalysis: a. Relevancy of the course curriculum. b. Relevancy of the Occupational Specification/CompetencyStandard. c. Suitability of existing training conduct/delivery method. d. Adequacy of the course duration. e. Relevancy of training methodology which includes delivery of theory and practical aspect of the training and conduct of the assessment. f. Relevancy of training device/training aid. CONCLUSION 13. Restate the aim of the evaluation. This section should also recap the essential points and information from methodology, results and analysis.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4D - 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION 14. Based on the result and analysis, the report should provide a recommendation concerning the following: a. The requirement to review the curriculum. b. The requirement to review the Competency Standard (CS). c. The requirement to review training conduct and delivery method. d. The requirement to review course duration.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.4E - 1 of 1 PART 4 ANNEX E TO CHAPTER 4 LIST OF TRAINING CATEGORIES REQUIRED EXTERNAL EVALUATION SER TRAINING CATEGORY SUB TRAINING CATEGORY REMARK 1. *Initial Military Training (IMT) - To be conducted in subsequent trades’ training school/institute prior to reporting to workplace environment 2. Specialist Training (ST) Technical Training (Basic Trade Training (BTT), Integrated/Advance Training (IAT), Selective Skill Training (SST)) - Aircrew Training (Basic Flying Training (BFT)) - 3. Professional Military Education (PME) - - Note: 1. Training Categories as per Part 2, Chapter 1, Para 7 and 8. 2. *IMT is exempted from Para 11 in Part 4, Chapter 4 - Candidates for external evaluation must have completed the course more than six (6) months but less than twelve (12) moths from the day of graduation.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.5 - 1 of 2 MARKAS PEMERINTAHAN PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN UDARA COMMAND TRAINING INSTRUCTIONS PART 4 CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 5 GUIDE FOR TRAINING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (TDDO) 1. Curriculum is to be designed and developed in modular form. The curriculum development process is laid out as per Annex A to Part 4, Chapter 3. INSTRUCTOR TO COURSE PARTICIPANT RATIO 2. In ensuring training effectiveness, the correct instructor/CP ratio is essential when developing curriculum. When developing curriculum, TDDO is to consider suitable and applicable ratio for: a. Number of instructor to be employed. b. Instructional approach to be used in delivering instruction for learning outcome. THEORY VS PRACTICAL 3. Under the CBTA concept, the general rule in determining the composition of the theory/practical content of a course is to emphasise the practical lessons as the overall aim of the training. It is to fulfil workplace competency and to produce personnel who can perform their tasks effectively. As a broad guideline in developing a training programme, the ratio of theory lessons shall not exceed 30% of the total course content. However, an exception to this rule can be applied for academic/education programmes that are inherently more theory-based, such as PME programmes. GENERAL SERVICE TRAINING (GST) 4. GST is to be included only for courses longer than four (4) weeks. A standard module is to be developed to describe the content and strategy. This module will be further elaborated in Part 9 of this document. COURSE ADMINISTRATIVE 5. Every course must be allocated sufficient time for the following activities: a. Arrival. b. Opening Ceremony (not applicable for Short Course). c. AdministrativeBrief, Safety & Security Brief and Course Brief. d. Internal Evaluation. e. ClosingCeremony.
RESTRICTED PU 9206 3rd Edition RESTRICTED 4.5 - 2 of 2 COURSE DURATION ESTIMATION 6. Course duration is estimated by determining module duration. However, the course duration is limited to a maximum of one (1) hour per session (50 minutes of instructional plus 10 minutes of break). A module in a course curriculum represents a unit of competency (one (1) duty in the Competency Profile Chart (CPC)). Each module must have theory, practical, and assessment (formative and summative) components. To estimate the course duration, the TDDO is to execute the following steps: a. Estimate the time required for training for each task by examining the Task Flow chart. b. Each module is independent of each other. However, a module can be a pre-requisite of another module. c. Add all module durations, including the GST module (if any) and course administration to estimate the courseduration. d. The estimation is rounded up to the following week. ASSESSMENT 7. Assessment for both knowledge and performance should be done after a module/modules/all modules have been completed. Assessment either formative or summative for both knowledge and performance assessment should be done IAW Section 5 of the course curriculum. 8. The question paper format both formative (FKA) and summative knowledge assessment (SKA) which will be included as course overall knowledge marks for officer and enlisted, is laid out as per Annex A this chapter.
RESTR RESTR 4.5A - PART 4 QUESTION PAPER FORMAT FKA AND SER SECTION QUE OFFICER BTT/ATT/STT PME FKA & SKA FKA & SKA 1. A Curriculum Section 5 Multiple Choice, Fill in t & True/False • 10 x objective question • 5 x questions fill in the • 5 x questions True/Fal • 20 marks 2. B Subjective (Answer All Q • 6 x questions • 40 marks 3. C Essay • Choose/Answer 2 x out of 4 x questions • 40 marks Duration of Assessment Curriculum Section 5 2 hours