The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

Biology - Course Companion - Andrew Allott and David Mindorff - Oxford 2014

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by INTERTU℠ EDUCATION, 2022-08-18 05:58:06

IB Biology - Course Companion - Oxford 2014

Biology - Course Companion - Andrew Allott and David Mindorff - Oxford 2014

Keywords: IB Biology

5.1 EviDEncE for Evolution

Daa-based qess: Missing links The discovery o ossils that ll in these gaps is
particularly exciting or biologists.
An objection to ossil evidence or evolution has
been gaps in the record, called missing links, 1 C alculate the length o Dilong paradoxus,
or example a link between reptiles and birds.

(a) (b) rom its head to the tip o its tail. [2]
(d) (c)
( g) 2 D educe three similarities between Dilong
paradoxus and reptiles that live on
Earth today. [3]

(h) (i) 3 Suggest a unction or the protoeathers o
(e) (f) 100 mm
Dilong paradoxus. [1 ]
(j)

4 Suggest two eatures which Dilong paradoxus

would have had to evolve to become

 Figure 3 Drawings o ossils recently ound in Western capable o fight. [2]
China. They show Dilong paradoxus, a 130-million-year-old
tyrannosauroid dinosaur with protoeathers. ad: bones o 5 Explain why it is not possible to be certain
skull; e: teeth; g: tail vertebrae with protoeathers; hj: whether the protoeathers o Dilong paradoxus
limb bones are homologous with the eathers o birds. [2]

Evidence from selective breeding

Selective breeding o domesticated animals shows that
artifcial selection can cause evolution.

Humans have deliberately bred and used particular animal species or
thousands o years. I modern breeds o livestock are compared with
the wild species that they most resemble, the dierences are oten huge.
Consider the dierences between modern egg-laying hens and the
jungleowl o Southern Asia, or between Belgian Blue cattle and the aurochs
o Western Asia. There are also many dierent breeds o sheep, cattle and
other domesticated livestock, with much variation between breeds.

It is clear that domesticated breeds have not always existed in their
current orm. The only credible explanation is that the change has been
achieved simply by repeatedly selecting or and breeding the individuals
most suited to human uses. This process is called articial selection.

The eectiveness o articial selection is shown by the considerable changes
that have occurred in domesticated animals over periods o time that are
very short, in comparison to geological time. It shows that selection can
cause evolution, but it does not prove that evolution o species has actually
occurred naturally, or that the mechanism or evolution is natural selection.

 Figure 4 Over the last 15,000 years many breeds o dog have been developed by artifcial 243
selection rom domesticated wolves

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Homology and Data-based questions: Domestication of corn

evolution A wild grass called teosinte that grows in Central America was
probably the ancestor o cultivated corn, Zea mays. When teosinte
Looking or patterns, trends is grown as a crop, it gives yields o about 1 50 kg per hectare. This
and disrepanies: there are compares with a world average yield o corn o 4,1 00 kg per hectare
ommon eatures in the one at the start o the 2 1 st century. Table 1 gives the lengths o some cobs.
struture o verterate lims Corn was domesticated at least 7,000 years ago.
despite their varied use.
1 Calculate the percentage dierence in length between teosinte
Vertebrate limbs are used in
many dierent ways, such as and Silver Queen. [2]
walking, running, jumping, fying,
swimming, grasping and digging. 2 Calculate the percentage dierence in yield between teosinte
These varied uses require joints that
articulate in dierent ways, dierent and world average yields o corn. [2]
velocities o movement and also
dierent amounts o orce. It would 3 Suggest actors apart rom cob length, selected or by armers. [3]
be reasonable to expect them to
have very dierent bone structure, 4 Explain why improvement slows down over generations o
but there are in act common
eatures o bone structure that are selection. [3]
ound in all vertebrate limbs.
corn variety and origin length of ob (mm)
Patterns like this require Teosinte  wild relative o orn 14
explanation. The only reasonable Early primitive orn rom Colomia 45
explanation so ar proposed in this Peruvian anient orn rom 500 bc 65
case is evolution rom a common Imriado  primitive orn rom Colomia 90
ancestor. As a consequence, Silver Queen  modern sweetorn 170
the common bone structure o
vertebrate limbs has become a classic  Table 1
piece o evidence or evolution.

 Figure 5 Corn cobs

Evidence from homologous structures

Evolution o homologous strutures y adaptive
radiation explains similarities in struture when there are
diferenes in untion.

D arwin pointed out in The Origin of Species that some similarities in
structure between organisms are supercial, or example between a
dugong and a whale, or between a whale and a sh. Similarities like
those between the tail ns o whales and shes are known as analogous
structures. When we study them closely we nd that these structures
are very dierent. An evolutionary interpretation is that they have had

244

5.1 EviDEncE for Evolution

dierent origins and have become similar because they perorm the
same or a similar unction. This is called convergent evolution.

Homologous structures are the converse o this. They are structures that
may look supercially dierent and perorm a dierent unction, but
which have what Darwin called a unity o type. He gave the example
o the orelimbs o a human, mole, horse, porpoise and bat and asked
what could be more curious than to nd that they include the same
bones, in the same relative positions, despite on the surace appearing
completely dierent. The evolutionary explanation is that they have
had the same origin, rom an ancestor that had a pentadactyl or ve-
digit limb, and that they have become dierent because they perorm
dierent unctions. This is called adaptive radiation.

There are many examples o homologous structures. They do not prove
that organisms have evolved or had common ancestry and do not reveal
anything about the mechanism o evolution, but they are dicult to
explain without evolution. Particularly interesting are the structures that
Darwin called rudimentary organs  reduced structures that serve no
unction. They are now called vestigial organs and examples o them are
the beginnings o teeth ound in embryo baleen whales, despite adults
being toothless, the small pelvis and thigh bone ound in the body wall
o whales and some snakes, and o course the appendix in humans.
These structures are easily explained by evolution as structures that no
longer have a unction and so are being gradually lost.

Pentadactyl limbs

Comparison o the pentadactyl limb o mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles
with dierent methods o locomotion.

The pentadactyl limb consists o these structures: classes that have limbs: amphibians, reptiles,
birds and mammals. Each o them has
Be se femb Hdmb pentadactyl limbs:

single bone in the humerus emur  crocodiles walk or crawl on land and use their
proximal part webbed hind limbs or swimming

two bones in the radius and ulna tibia and fbula  penguins use their hind limbs or walking and
distal part their orelimbs as fippers or swimming

group o wrist/ carpals tarsals  echidnas use all our limbs or walking and
ankle bones also use their orelimbs or digging

series o bones in metacarpals and metatarsals  rogs use all our limbs or walking and their
hindlimbs or jumping.
each o fve digits phalanges and phalanges
Dierences can be seen in the relative lengths and
The pattern o bones or a modication o it is thicknesses o the bones. Some metacarpals and
present in all amphibians, reptiles, birds and phalanges have been lost during the evolution o
mammals, whatever the unction o their limbs. the penguins orelimb.

The photos in gure 6 show the skeletons o
one example o each o the our vertebrates

245

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Activity

Pentadactyl limbs in
mammals

mole
horse

porpoise  Figure 6

bat speciation
human
Populations o a species can gradually diverge into
 Figure 7 Pentadactyl limbs separate species by evolution.
(not to scale)
If two populations of a species become separated so that they do
Choose a colour code or not interbreed and natural selection then acts differently on the two
the types o bone in a populations, they will evolve in different ways. The characteristics of
pentadactyl limb and colour the two populations will gradually diverge. After a time they will be
the diagrams in fgure 7 to recognizably different. If the populations subsequently merge and have
show the type o each bone. the chance of interbreeding, but do not actually interbreed, it would be
How is each limb used? clear that they have evolved into separate species. This process is called
What eatures o the bones speciation.
in each limb make them well
adapted to the use? Speciation often occurs after a population of a species extends its range
by migrating to an island. This explains the large numbers of endemic
species on islands. An endemic species is one that is found only in a
certain geographical area. The lava lizards of the Galpagos Islands
are an example of this. One species is present on all the main islands
of the archipelago. On six smaller islands there is a closely related but
different species, formed by migration to the island and by subsequent
divergence.

246

5.1 EviDEncE for Evolution

Evidence from patterns of variation Pinta

Continuous variation across the geographical Genovesa
range o related populations matches the
concept o gradual divergence. Marchena
Santiago

I populations gradually diverge over time to become separate Fernandina Santa Cruz San Cristbal
species, then at any one moment we would expect to be able

to nd examples o all stages o divergence. This is indeed Santa Fe
what we nd in nature, as Charles Darwin describes in
C hapter II o The Origin of Species. He wrote: Isabela Santa Maria E s p a  o la

Many years ago, when comparing, and seeing others compare, key T. delanonis T. habelii T. grayii
the birds from the separate islands ofthe Galpagos Archipelago, T. albemarlensis T. pacicus T. bivittatus
both one with another, and with those from the American T. duncanensis
mainland, I was much struck how entirely vague and arbitrary

is the distinction between species and varieties.  Figure 8 Distribution of lava lizards in the

Galpagos Islands

Darwin gave examples o populations that are recognizably

dierent, but not to the extent that they are clearly separate

species. One o his examples is the red grouse o Britain and the willow

ptarmigan o Norway. They have sometimes been classied as separate

species and sometimes as varieties o the species Lagopus lagopus. This is a

common problem or biologists who name and classiy living organisms.

Because species can gradually diverge over long periods o time and

there is no sudden switch rom being two populations o one species to

being two separate species, the decision to lump populations together or

split them into separate species remains rather arbitrary.

The continuous range in variation between populations does not match TOK
either the belie that species were created as distinct types o organism
and thereore should be constant across their geographic range or that t wha exe a mpe mdes
species are unchanging. Instead it provides evidence or the evolution o be sed  es hees?
species and the origin o new species by evolution.

Industrial melanism The useulness o a theory is
the degree to which it explains
Development o melanistic insects in polluted areas. phenomenon and the degree to
which it allows predictions to be
Dark varieties o typically light-coloured insects are called melanistic. made. One way to test the theory
The most amous example o an insect with a melanistic variety o evolution by natural selection is
is Biston betularia, the peppered moth. It has been widely used as through the use o computer models.
an example o natural selection, as the melanistic variety became The Blind Watchmaker computer
commoner in polluted industrial areas where it is better camoufaged model is used to demonstrate how
than the pale peppered variety. A simple explanation o industrial complexity can evolve rom simple
melanism is this: orms through artifcial selection. The
Weasel computer model is used to
 Adult Biston betularia moths fy at night to try to nd a mate demonstrate how artifcial selection
and reproduce. can increase the pace o evolution
over random events. What eatures
 During the day they roost on the branches o trees. would a computer model have to
include or it to simulate evolution by
 Birds and other animals that hunt in daylight predate moths i natural selection realistically?
they nd them.

247

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

 In unpolluted areas tree branches are covered in pale-coloured
lichens and peppered moths are well camoufaged against them.

 Sulphur dioxide pollution kills lichens. Soot rom coal burning
blackens tree branches.

 Melanic moths are well camoufaged against dark tree branches in
polluted areas.

 In polluted areas the melanic variety o Biston betularia replaced
the peppered variety over a relatively short time, but not in non-
polluted areas.

 Figure 9 Museum specimen of the  Figure 10 The ladybug Adalia bipunctata
peppered form of Biston betularia has a melanic form which has become
mounted on tree bark with lichens common in polluted areas. A melanic male
from an unpolluted area is mating with a normal female here

Biologists have used industrial melanism as a classic example o
evolution by natural selection. Perhaps because o this, research
ndings have been repeatedly attacked. The design o some early
experiments into camoufage and predation o the moths has been
criticized and this has been used to cast doubt over whether natural
selection ever actually occurs.

Michael Majerus gives a careul evaluation o evidence about the
development o melanism in Biston betularia and other species o moth
in his book in the New Naturalist series (Moths, Michael Majerus,
HarperCollins 2002) . His nding is that the evidence or industrial
pollution causing melanism in Biston betularia and other species o moth is
strong, though actors other than camoufage can also infuence survival
rates o pale and melanic varieties.

Data-based questions: Predation rates in Biston betularia

One o the criticisms o the original experiments orms ( ty o each) o Biston betularia were
into predation o Biston betularia was that the placed in exposed positions on tree trunks and 50

moths were placed in exposed positions on tree millimetres below a joint between a major branch

trunks and that this is not normally where they and the tree trunk. This procedure was carried out

roost. The moths were able to move to more at two oak woods, one in an unpolluted area o

suitable positions but even so the criticisms have the New Forest in southern England and another

persisted on some websites. Experiments done in in a polluted area near Stoke-on-Trent in the

the 1 980s tested the eect o the position in which Midlands. The box plots in gure 1 1 show the

the moths were placed. Peppered and melanic percentage o moths eaten and moths surviving.

248

5.2 n AturAl sElEction

1 a) Deduce, with a reason from the data, peppered Stoke on Trent and New Forest

whether the moths were more likely to be

eaten if they were placed on the exposed New Forest/melanic/BJ 60 40

trunk or below the junction of a main New Forest/melanic/ET 38 62

branch and the trunk. [2] New Forest/peppered/BJ 74 26

b) Suggest a reason for the difference. [1 ] New Forest/peppered/ET 68 32

2 a) Compare and contrast the survival S t o ke /m e l a n i c /B J 72 28

rates of peppered and melanic moths

in the New Forest. [3] Stoke/melanic/ET 60 40

b) Explain the difference in survival Stoke/peppered/BJ 50 50

rate between the two varieties in the S t o ke /p e p p e re d /E T 42 58

New Forest. [3] melanic 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

3 D istinguish between the S toke- on- Trent and

New Forest woodlands in relative survival key

rates of peppered and melanic moths. [2] not eaten eaten

4 Pollution due to industry has decreased ET = exposed trunk BJ = branch junction

greatly near S toke- on- Trent since the 1 980s.  Figure 11

Predict the consequences of this change for Source: Howlett and Majerus (1987) The Understanding of
industrial melanism in the peppered moth (Biston betularia)
Biston betularia. [4] Biol. J.Linn.Soc. 30, 3144

5.2 naa ee

uderstdig applictios

 Natural selection can only occur i there is  Changes in beaks o fnches on Daphne Major.
variation amongst members o the same species.  Evolution o antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

 Mutation, meiosis and sexual reproduction ntre of sciece
cause variation between individuals in a species.
 Use theories to explain natural phenomena:
 Adaptations are characteristics that make an the theory o evolution by natural selection
individual suited to its environment and way olie. can explain the development o antibiotic
resistance in bacteria.
 Species tend to produce more ospring than
the environment can support.

 Individuals that are better adapted tend to survive
and produce more ospring while the less well
adapted tend to die or produce ewer ospring.

 Individuals that reproduce pass on
characteristics to their ospring.

 Natural selection increases the requency o
characteristics that make individuals better
adapted and decreases the requency o other
characteristics leading to changes within the
species.

249

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

 Figure 1 Populations o bluebells (Hyacinthoides vrition
non-scripta) mostly have blue fowers but
white-fowered plants sometimes occur Natural selection can only occur if there is variation
amongst members of the same species.

Charles Darwin developed his understanding of the mechanism that
causes evolution over many years, after returning to England from
his voyage around the world on HMS Beagle. He probably developed
the theory of natural selection in the late 1 830s, but then worked
to accumulate evidence for it. D arwin published his great work, The
Origin of Species, in 1 85 9. In this book of nearly 5 00 pages, he explains
his theory and presents the evidence for it that he had found over the
previous 20 to 30 years.

One of the observations on which Darwin based the theory of evolution
by natural selection is variation. Typical populations vary in many
respects. Variation in human populations is obvious  height, skin colour,
blood group and many other features. With other species the variation
may not be so immediately obvious but careful observation shows that
it is there. Natural selection depends on variation within populations  if
all individuals in a population were identical, there would be no way of
some individuals being favoured more than others.

 Figure 2 Dandelions (Taraxacum ofcinale) source of rition
appear to be reproducing sexually when they
disperse their seed but the embryos in the Mutation, meiosis and sexual reproduction cause
seeds have been produced asexually so are variation between individuals in a species.
genetically identical
The causes of variation in populations are now well understood:

1 Mutation is the original source of variation. New alleles are produced
by gene mutation, which enlarges the gene pool of a population.

2 Meiosis produces new combinations of alleles by breaking up the
existing combination in a diploid cell. Every cell produced by meiosis
in an individual is likely to carry a different combination of alleles,
because of crossing over and the independent orientation of bivalents.

3 Sexual reproduction involves the fusion of male and female gametes.
The gametes usually come from different parents, so the offspring has
a combination of alleles from two individuals. This allows mutations
that occurred in different individuals to be brought together.

In species that do not carry out sexual reproduction the only source
of variation is mutation. It is generally assumed that such species will
not generate enough variation to be able to evolve quickly enough for
survival during times of environmental change.

adpttion

Adaptations are characteristics that make an individual
suited to its environment and way of life.

One of the recurring themes in biology is the close relationship between
structure and function. For example, the structure of a birds beak is
correlated with its diet and method of feeding. The thick coat of a musk

250

5.2 n AturAl sElEction

ox is obviously correlated with the low temperatures in its northerly Avy
habitats. The water storage tissue in the stem o a cactus is related to
inrequent rainall in desert habitats. In biology characteristics such as Adapa f bd beak
these that make an individual suited to its environment or way o lie
are called adaptations. The our photographs o
birds show the beaks o a
The term adaptation implies that characteristics develop over time heron, macaw, hawk and
and thus that species evolve. It is important not to imply purpose in woodpecker. To what diet
this process. According to evolutionary theory adaptations develop by and method o eeding is
natural selection, not with the direct purpose o making an individual each adapted?
suited to its environment. They do not develop during the lietime o
one individual. Characteristics that do develop during a lietime are
known as acquired characteristics and a widely accepted theory is that
acquired characteristics cannot be inherited.

Overproduction o ofspring  Figure 3

Species tend to produce more ofspring than the
environment can support.

Living organisms vary in the number o ospring they produce.

An example o a species with a relatively slow breeding rate is the
southern ground hornbill, Bucorvus leadbeateri. It raises one fedgling
every three years on average and needs the cooperation o at least two
other adults to do this. However they can live or as long as 70 years
so in their lietime a pair could theoretically raise twenty ospring.

Most species have a aster breeding rate. For example, the coconut palm,
Cocos nucifera usually produces between 2 0 and 60 coconuts per year.
Apart rom bacteria, the astest breeding rate o all may be in the ungus
Calvatia gigantea. It produces a huge ruiting body called a giant puball
in which there can be as many as 7 trillion spores (7,000,000,000,000) .

Despite the huge variation in
breeding rate, there is an overall
trend in living organisms or more
ospring to be produced than the
environment can support. Darwin
pointed out that this will tend to
lead to a struggle or existence
within a population. There will be
competition or resources and not
every individual will obtain enough
to allow them to survive and
reproduce.

Figure 4 The breeding rate of pairs of
southern ground hornbills, Bucorvus
leadbeateri, is as low as 0.3 young per year

251

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Activity diferential survival an reprouction

simulation of natural Individuals that are better adapted tend to survive and
election produce more ospring while the less well adapted tend
to die or produce ewer ospring.
 Make ten or more
artifcial fsh using Chance plays a part in deciding which individuals survive and reproduce
modelling clay, or some and which do not, but the characteristics o an individual also have an
other malleable material. infuence. In the struggle or existence the less well-adapted individuals
Drop each o them into tend to die or ail to reproduce and the best adapted tend to survive and
a measuring cylinder o produce many ospring. This is natural selection.
water and time how long
each takes to reach the An example that is oten quoted is that o the girae. It can graze on
bottom. grass and herbs but is more adapted to browse on tree leaves. In the wet
season its ood is abundant but in the dry season there can be periods
 Discard the hal o o ood shortage when the only remaining tree leaves are on high
the models that were branches. Giraes with longer necks are better adapted to reaching
slowest. Pair up the these leaves and surviving periods o ood shortage than those with
astest models and shorter necks.
make intermediate
shapes, to represent Inheritance
their ospring. Random
new shapes can also be Individuals that reproduce pass on characteristics
introduced to simulate to their ospring.
mutation.
Much o the variation between individuals can be passed on to
 Test the new generation ospring  it is heritable. Maasai children inherit the dark skin colour
and repeat the o their parents or example and children o light-skinned north
elimination o the European parents inherit a light skin colour. Variation in behaviour can
slowest and the breeding be heritable. The direction o migration to overwintering sites in the
o the astest. Does blackcap Sylvia atricapilla is an example. D ue to dierences in their genes,
one shape gradually some birds o this species migrate southwestwards rom Germany to
emerge? Describe its Spain or the winter and others northwestwards to Britain.
eatures.
Not all eatures are passed on to ospring. Those acquired during the
lietime o an individual are not usually inherited. An elephant with a
broken tusk does not have calves with broken tusks or example. I a
person develops darker skin colour through exposure to sunlight, the
darker skin is not inherited. Acquired characteristics are thereore not
signicant in the evolution o a species.

Progressive change

Natural selection increases the requency o
characteristics that make individuals better adapted and
decreases the requency o other characteristics leading
to changes within the species.

B ecause better-adapted individuals survive, they can reproduce and
pass on characteristics to their ospring. Individuals that are less well
adapted have lower survival rates and less reproductive success. This
leads to an increase in the proportion o individuals in a population with

252

5.2 n AturAl sElEction

characteristics that make them well adapted. Over the generations, the Avy
characteristics o the population gradually change  this is evolution by
natural selection. The impulse to reproduce and pass
on characteristics can be very strong.
Major evolutionary changes are likely to occur over long time periods It can cause adult males to carry out
and many generations, so we should not expect to be able to observe infanticide. How could this behaviour
them during our lietime, but there are many examples o smaller but pattern have evolved in lions and
signicant changes that have been observed. The evolution o dark wing other species? Female cheetahs mate
colours in moths has been observed in industrial areas with polluted with two or more males so their litters
air. Two examples o evolution are described in the next sections o have multiple paternity. How does this
this book: changes to beaks o nches on the Galapagos Islands and the protect the young against infanticide?
development o antibiotic resistance in bacteria.
 Figure 5 A female cheetahs cubs inherit
Daa-baed qe: Evolution in rice plants characteristics from her and from one of
the several males with whom she mated
The bar charts in gure 6 show the results o an investigation o
evolution in rice plants. F1 hybrid plants were bred by crossing together 253
two rice varieties. These hybrids were then grown at ve dierent sites
in Japan. Each year the date o fowering was recorded and seed was
collected rom the plants, or re-sowing at that site in the ollowing year.

F F F F
3 4 5 

Sapporo
43 N

Fujisaka
40 N

Konasu
36 N

single H i ra tsu ka
original 35 N
population
planted Chikugo
out at 33 N

Miyazaki
31 N

56 70 84 98 112 126 68 82 96 110 124 138 54 68 82 96 110124138 51 65 79 93 107121 135

days to owering

 Figure 6

1 Why was the investigation done using hybrids rather than a

single pure-bred variety? [2]

2 Describe the changes, shown in the chart, between the F3 and

F6 generations o rice plants grown at Miyazaki. [2]

3 a) State the relationship between fowering time and latitude

in the F6 generation. [1 ]

b) Suggest a reason or this relationship. [1 ]

4 a) Predict the results i the investigation had been carried on

until the F generation. [1 ]
10

b) Predict the results o collecting seeds rom F10 plants grown at

Sapporo and rom F10 plants grown at Miyazaki and sowing

them together at Hiratsuka. [3]

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Galpagos fnches

Changes in beaks o fnches on Daphne Major.

Pinta (5) Genovesa (4)
Rabida (8) Marchena (4)

Santiago (10)
Daphne Major (2/3)

Fernandina Santa Cruz San Cristbal (a) G. fortis (large beak)
(9) (9) (7)

Isabela (10) Santa Fe
(5)

Santa Maria (8) Espaola (3)

 Figure 7 The Galpagos archipelago with the number
o species o fnch ound on each island

Darwin visited the Galpagos Islands in 1 835 (b) G. fortis (small beak)
and collected specimens o small birds, which
were subsequently identifed as fnches. There are (c) G. magnirostris
1 4 species in all. Darwin observed that the sizes and
shapes o the beaks o the fnches varied, as did their  Figure 8 Variation in beak shape in Galpagos fnches.
diet. From the overall similarities between the birds (a) G. fortis (large beak) . (b) G. fortis (small beak) .
and their distribution over the Galapagos islands (c) G. magnirostris
(see fgure 7) , Darwin hypothesized that one might
really ancy that rom an original paucity o birds among individuals with shorter beaks. In 1 98283
in this archipelago, one species had been taken and there was a severe El Nio event, causing eight
modifed or dierent ends. months o heavy rain and as a result an increased
supply o small, sot seeds and ewer large, hard
There has since been intense research into seeds. G. fortis bred rapidly, in response to the
what have become known as Darwins fnches. increase in ood availability. With a return to dry
In particular, Peter and Rosemary Grant have weather conditions and greatly reduced supplies
shown that beak characters and diet are closely o small seeds, breeding stopped until 1 987. In
related and when one changes, the other does that year, only 3 7 per cent o those alive in 1 983
also. A particular ocus o Peter and Rosemary bred and they were not a random sample o the
Grants research has been a population o the 1 983 population. In 1 987, G. fortis had longer and
medium ground fnch, Geospiza fortis, on a small narrower beaks than the 1 983 averages, correlating
island called D aphne Maj or. O n this island, the with the reduction in supply o small seeds.
small ground fnch, Geospiza fuliginosa, is almost Variation in the shape and size o the beaks ( see
absent. Both species eed on small seeds, though fgure 8) is mostly due to genes, though the
G. fortis can also eat larger seeds. In the absence
o competition rom G. fuliginosa or small seeds,
G. fortis is smaller in body size and beak size on
Daphne Major than on other islands.

In 1 977, a drought on Daphne Major caused a
shortage o small seeds, so G. fortis ed instead
on larger, harder seeds, which the larger-beaked
individuals are able to crack open. Most o the
population died in that year, with highest mortality

254

5.2 n AturAl sElEction

environment has some eect. The proportion o One o the objections to the theory o evolution
the variation due to genes is called heritability. by natural selection is that signifcant changes
Using the heritability o beak length and width caused by natural selection have not been
and data about the birds that had survived to observed actually occurring. It is unreasonable to
breed, the changes in mean beak length and expect huge changes to have occurred in a species,
width between 1 983 and 1 987 were predicted. even i it had been ollowed since Darwins theory
The observed results are very close to the was published in 1 85 9, but in the case o G. fortis,
predictions. Average beak length was predicted to signifcant changes have occurred that are clearly
increase by 1 0 m and actually increased by 6 m. linked to natural selection.
Average beak width was predicted to decrease by
1 30 m and actually decreased by 1 20 m.

Daa-baed qe: Galpagos fnches the changes in the population o

When Peter and Rosemary Grant began to study G. magnirostris. [3]
fnches on the island o Daphne Major in 1 973,
there were breeding populations o two species, 2 Daphne Major has an area o 0.34 km2.
Geospiza fortis and Geospiza scandens. Geospiza 1 km2 is 1 00 hectares and 1 hectare is 1 00 
magnirostris established a breeding population on
the island in 1 982, initially with just two emales 1 00 m. Calculate the maximum and
and three males. Figure 9 shows the numbers
o G. magnirostris and G. fortis on D aphne Maj or minimum population densities o G. ortis
between 1 997 and 2006.
during 1 9972006. [4]
1500 G. fortis
G. magnirostrisnumbersTable 2 shows the percentages o three types o
seed in the diets o the three fnch species on
1000 D aphne Maj or. Small seeds are produced by 2 2
plant species, medium seeds by the cactus Opuntia
echios, and large seeds, which are very hard, by
Tribulus cistoides.

500 3 a) Outline the diet o each o the species

o fnch on D aphne Maj or. [3]

0 b) There was a very severe drought on
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Daphne Major in 2003 and 2004.
Deduce how the diet o the fnches
year changed during the drought, using
the data in the table.
 Figure 9 Changes in numbers of G. fortis and G. magnirostris
between 1996 and 2006

1 a) Describe the changes in the population [3]

o G. magnirostris between 1 997 4 Figure 1 0 shows an index o beak size o adult
G. fortis rom 1 973 to 2 006, with the size in
and 2006. [2] 1 973 assigned the value zero and the sizes in
other years shown in comparison to this.
b) Compare the changes in population o
G. fortis between 1 997 and 2 006 with

spee 1977 Geospiza fortis 2004 Geospiza magnirostris Geospiza scandens
Yea 75 1985 1989 80 1985 1989 2004 1977 1985 1989 2004
sma 10 11
17 80 77 8.2 18 5.9 4.5 85 77 23 17
Medm 0.0 5.1 0.0 12 26 15 22 70 83
lage 19 16 82 82 69 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

 Table 2

255

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

1 c) In the frst severe drought, the mean

beak size o G. fortis increased, but in the

0.5 second drought, it decreased. Using the

data in this question, explain how natural

beak size index 0 selection could cause these changes in

beak size in the two droughts. [3]

-0.5 5 The intensity o natural selection on Daphne

Major was calculated during the two

-1 droughts. The calculated values are called

selection dierentials. They range rom 1 .08

-1.5 or beak length during the second drought,
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
year 2005 to +0.88 or beak length in the frst drought,

 Figure 10 Relative beak size in G. fortis between with similar selection dierentials or beak
1973 and 2006
width and depth and overall beak size.

These are very large selection dierentials,

compared to values calculated in other

The graph shows two periods o very rapid investigations o evolution.
change in mean beak size, both o which
correspond with droughts on D aphne Maj or. Suggest reasons or natural selection on the

beak size o G. fortis being unusually intense

a) State two periods o most rapid change on the island o D aphne Maj or. [2]

in mean beak size o G. fortis. [2] 6 Discuss the advantages o investigations

b) Suggest two reasons or mean beak size o evolution over long periods and the reasons

changing most rapidly when there is or ew long-term investigations

a drought. [2] being done. [3]

natural selectio ad atibiotic resistace

Use theories to explain natural phenomena: the theory of evolution by natural

selection can explain the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

Antibiotics were one o the great triumphs o development o antibiotic resistance is thereore
medicine in the 2 0th century. When they were an example o evolution. It can be explained in
frst introduced, it was expected that they would terms o the theory o natural selection. A scientifc
oer a permanent method o controlling bacterial understanding o how antibiotic resistance
diseases, but there have been increasing problems develops is very useul as it gives an understanding
o antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria. o what should be done to reduce the problem.

The ollowing trends have become established: 16% resistant
14
 Ater an antibiotic is introduced and used on 12
patients, bacteria showing resistance appear 10
within a ew years.
8
 Resistance to the antibiotic spreads to more 6
and more species o pathogenic bacteria. 4
2
 In each species the proportion o inections 0
that are caused by a resistant strain increases.
 Figure 11 Percentage resistance to ciprofoxacin between
So, during the time over which antibiotics 1990 and 2004
have been used to treat bacterial diseases there 1990
have been cumulative changes in the antibiotic 1991
resistance properties o populations o bacteria. The 1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004

256

5.2 n AturAl sElEction

antibiotic resistnce

Evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

Antibiotic resistance is due to genes in bacteria and population with no
so it can be inherited. The mechanism that causes antibiotic-resistant bacteria
antibiotic resistance to become more prevalent or
to diminish is summarized in gure 1 2. antibiotic resistance antibiotic resistance
gene received from a gene formed by
The evolution o multiple antibiotic resistance bacterium in another mutation in one
has occurred in just a ew decades. This rapid bacterium
evolution is due to the ollowing causes: population

 There has been very widespread use o population with some
antibiotics, both or treating diseases and in antibiotic-resistant bacteria
animal eeds used on arms.
antibiotic is used therefore
 B acteria can reproduce very rapidly, with a there is strong natural
generation time o less than an hour. selection for resistance

 Populations o bacteria are oten huge, population with more
increasing the chance o a gene or antibiotic antibiotic-resistant bacteria
resistance being ormed by mutation.
antibiotic is not used therefore
 Bacteria can pass genes on to other bacteria in there is natural selection
several ways, including using plasmids, which (weak) against resistance
allow one species o bacteria to gain antibiotic
resistance genes rom another species. population with slightly fewer
antibiotic-resistant bacteria

 Figure 12 Evolution o antibiotic resistance

Daa-baed qe: Chlortetracycline resistance in soil bacteria

Bacteria were collected rom soil at dierent desistance (%) 3.0
distances rom a site on a pig arm in Minnesota
where manure had been allowed to overfow 2.5
rom an animal pen and accumulate. The
eed given to the pigs on this arm contained 2.0
subtherapeutic low doses o the antibiotic
chlortetracycline, in order to promote aster 1.5
growth rates. The bacteria were tested to nd
out what percentage o them was resistant to 1.0
this antibiotic. The results are shown in the bar
chart. The yellow bars show the percentage o 0.5
chlortetracycline resistant bacteria that grew on
nutrient-rich medium and the orange bars show 0.0
the percentage on a nutrient-poor medium that 5 m 20 m 100 m
encouraged dierent types o bacteria to grow.
distance from animal pen
Source: " The efects o subtherapeutic antibiotic use in arm animals
on the prolieration and persistence o antibiotic resistance among soil
bacteria", Sudeshna Ghosh and Timothy M LaPara, The International
Society for Microbial Ecology Journal (2007) 1, 191203

1 a) State the relationship between percentage
antibiotic resistance and distance rom the 2 Predict whether the percentage antibiotic
[1 ] resistance would have been lower at 200 metres
animal pen. rom the pen than at 1 00 metres. [3]

b) Explain the dierence in antibiotic
resistance between populations o bacteria 3 Discuss the use o subtherapeutic doses o
[4] antibiotics in animal eeds. [2]
near and ar rom the pen.

257

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

5.3 classifation o biodiversity

udertdig applictio

 The binomial system o names or species is  Classifcation o one plant and one animal
universal among biologists and has been agreed species rom domain to species level.
and developed at a series o congresses.
 External recognition eatures o bryophytes,
 When species are discovered they are given flicinophytes, conierophytes and
scientifc names using the binomial system. angiospermophytes.

 Taxonomists classiy species using a hierarchy  Recognition eatures o poriera, cnidaria,
o taxa. platyhelminthes, annelida, mollusca and
arthropoda, chordata.
 All organisms are classifed into three domains.
 Recognition o eatures o birds, mammals,
 The principal taxa or classiying eukaryotes are amphibians, reptiles and fsh.
kingdom, phylum, class, order, amily, genus
and species. skill

 In a natural classifcation the genus and  Construction o dichotomous keys or use in
accompanying higher taxa consist o all the identiying specimens.
species that have evolved rom one common
ancestral species. ntre o ciece

 Taxonomists sometimes reclassiy groups  Cooperation and collaboration between groups
o species when new evidence shows that a o scientists: scientists use the binomial
previous taxon contains species that have system to identiy a species rather than the
evolved rom dierent ancestral species. many dierent local names.

 Natural classifcations help in identifcation
o species and allow the prediction o
characteristics shared by species within
a group.

Itertiol coopertio d clifctio

Cooperation and collaboration between groups o scientists: scientists use the
binomial system to identiy a species rather than the many dierent local names.

Recognizable groups of organisms are known to la chandelle, le pied-de-veau, le manteau de
biologists as species. The same species can have la Sainte-Vierge, la pilette or la vachotte. In
many different local names, even within one Spanish there are even more names for this one
language. For example, in England the species species of which these are just a few: comida
of plant known to scientists as Arum maculatum de culebra, alcatrax, barba de arn, dragontia
has been called lords-and-ladies, cuckoo- menor, hoj as de fuego, vela del diablo and yerba
pint, jack in the pulpit, devils and angels, del quemado. The name primaveras is used for
cows and bulls, willy lily and snakes meat. In Arum maculatum in S panish but for a different
French there is also a variety of local names: plant in other languages.

258

5.3 clAssificAtion of BioDi vErsitY

Local names may be a valuable part o the Seeblumen and geel Seeblumen (used by Fuchs) ,
culture o an area, but science is an international English wild mynte and water mynte (used by
venture so scientifc names are needed that are Turner) and Malayan jambu bol and jambu chilli
understood throughout the world. The binomial (applied by Malays to dierent species o Eugenia) .
system that has developed is a good example o
cooperation and collaboration between scientists.  Figure 1 Arum maculatum

The credit or devising our modern system o
naming species is given to the Swedish biologist
Carl Linnaeus who introduced a system o two-
part names in the 1 8th century. This stroke o
genius was the basis or the binomial system that
is still in use today. In act Linnaeus was mirroring
a style o nomenclature that had been used in
many languages beore. The style recognizes that
there are groups o similar species, so the name or
each species in a group consists o a specifc name
attached to the group name, as in the Ancient
Greek    and   
(used by Threophrastus) , Latin anagallis mas and
anagallis femina (used by Pliny) , German weiss

development of the binomial system  Figure 2 Linnaea borealis. Binomials
are often chosen to honour a biologist,
The binomial system of names for species is universal or to describe a feature of the
among biologists and has been agreed and developed organism. Linnaea borealis is named
at a series of congresses. in honour of Carl Linnaeus, the Swedish
biologist who introduced the binomial
To ensure that all biologists use the same system o names or living system of nomenclature and named
organisms, congresses attended by delegates rom around the world are many plants and animals using it
held at regular intervals. There are separate congresses or animals and
or plants and ungi. 259

International Botanical Congresses (IBC) were held every year during
the late 1 9th century. The IB C held in Genoa in 1 892 proposed that
1 753 be taken as the starting point or both genera and species o
plants and ungi as this was the year when Linnaeus published Species
Plantarum, the book that gave consistent binomials or all species o the
plant kingdom then known. The IB C o Vienna in 1 905 accepted by
1 50 votes to 1 9 the rule that La nomenclature botanique commence
avec Linn, Species Plantarum ( ann. 1 75 3 ) pour les groupes de plantes
vasculaires. The 1 9th IBC will be in Shenzhen, China, in 201 7.

The frst International Zoological Congress was held in Paris in 1 889.
It was recognized that internationally accepted rules or naming and
classiying animal species were needed and these were agreed at this
and subsequent congresses. 1 758 was chosen as the starting date or
valid names o animal species as this was when Linnaeus published
Systema Natura in which he gave binomials or all species known then.
The current International Code or Zoological Nomenclature is the
4th edition and there will no doubt be more editions in the uture as
scientists refne the methods that they use or naming species.

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

ALLI G ATO R I D AE m is s iss ip p ie n s is the binomial sysem
Alligator sinensis
When species are discovered they are given scientifc
Ca im a n crocodilus names using the binomial system.
latirostris
yacare The system that biologists use is called binomial nomenclature, because
the international name o a species consists o two words. An example is
Melano- niger Linnaea borealis ( fgure 2 ) . The frst name is the genus name. A genus is
suchus a group o species that share certain characteristics. The second name
is the species or specifc name. There are various rules about binomial
Paleo- palpebrosus nomenclature:
suchus trig o n a tu s
 The genus name begins with an upper-case ( capital) letter and the
 Figure 3 Classifcation o the alligator amily species name with a lower-case ( small) letter.

 In typed or printed text, a binomial is shown in italics.

 Ater a binomial has been used once in a piece o text, it can be
abbreviated to the initial letter o the genus name with the ull
species name, or example: L. borealis.

 The earliest published name or a species, rom 1 753 onwards or
plants or 1 758 or animals, is the correct one.

the hierarchy of axa

Taxonomists classiy species using a hierarchy o taxa.

The word taxon is Greek and means a group o something. The plural is
taxa. In biology, species are arranged or classifed into taxa. Every species
is classifed into a genus. Genera are grouped into amilies. An example
o the genera and species in a amily is shown in fgure 3. Families are
grouped into orders, orders into classes and so on up to the level o
kingdom or domain. The taxa orm a hierarchy, as each taxon includes
taxa rom the level below. Going up the hierarchy, the taxa include larger
and larger numbers o species, which share ewer and ewer eatures.

the hree domains

All organisms are classifed into three domains.

Traditional classifcation systems have recognized two maj or categories
o organisms based on cell types: eukaryotes and prokaryotes. This
classifcation is now regarded as inappropriate because the prokaryotes
have been ound to be very diverse. In particular, when the base
sequence o ribosomal RNA was determined, it became apparent that
there are two distinct groups o prokaryotes. They were given the names
Eubacteria and Archaea.

Most classifcation systems thereore now recognize three major categories
o organism, Eubacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota. These categories are
called domains, so all organisms are classifed into three domains. Table 1
shows some o the eatures that can be used to distinguish between them.
Members o the domains are usually reerred to as bacteria, archaeans
and eukaryotes. Bacteria and eukaryotes are relatively amiliar to most
biologists but archaeans are oten less well known.

260

5.3 clAssificAtion of BioDi vErsitY

feaue Dma

Baea Ahaea Eukaya

Histones associated Absent Proteins similar to histones Present
with DNA bound to DNA

Presence o introns Rare or absent Present in some genes Frequent

Structure o cell walls Made o chemical called Not made o peptidoglycan Not made o peptidoglycan;

peptidoglycan not always present

Cell membrane Glycerol-ester lipids; Glycerol-ether lipids; Glycerol-ester lipids;
dierences unbranched side chains;
d-orm o glycerol unbranched side chains; l-orm unbranched side chains;

o glycerol d-orm o glycerol

 Table 1

Archaeans are ound in a broad range o habitats such as the ocean surace, Ay
deep ocean sediments and even oil deposits ar below the surace o the
Earth. They are also ound in some airly extreme habitats such as water ideyg a kgdm
with very high salt concentrations or temperatures close to boiling. The This is a defnition o the
methanogens are obligate anaerobes and give o methane as a waste product characteristics o organisms in
o their metabolism. Methanogens live in the intestines o cattle and the guts one o the kingdoms. Can you
o termites and are responsible or the production o marsh gas in marshes. deduce which kingdom it is?

Viruses are not classifed in any o the three domains. Although they Multicellular; cells typically
have genes coding or proteins using the same genetic code as living held together by intercellular
organisms they have too ew o the characteristics o lie to be regarded junctions; extracellular
as living organisms. matrix with brous proteins,
typically collagens, between
Bacteria Archaea Eukaryota two dissimilar epithelia;
sexual with production ofan
Green lamentous Slime egg cell that is fertilized by a
smaller, often monociliated,
Spirochetes bacteria molds Animals sperm cell; phagotrophic and
Proteobacteria Gram Methanobacterium Halophiles Fungi osmotrophic; without cell wall.
positives Methanococcus
Plants  Figure 5 Brown seaweeds have
been classifed in the kingdom
Cy an o b a cte ria Ciliates Protoctista

Flagellates 261

 Figure 4 Tree diagram showing relationships between living organisms based on base
sequences o ribosomal RNA

Eukaryote classifcation

The principal taxa or classiying eukaryotes are kingdom,
phylum, class, order, amily, genus and species.

Eukaryotes are classifed into kingdoms. Each kingdom is divided up
into phyla, which are divided into classes, then orders, amilies and
genera. The hierarchy o taxa or classiying eukaryotes is thus kingdom,
phylum, class, order, amily, genus and species.

Most biologists recognize our kingdoms o eukaryote: plants, animals,
ungi and protoctista. The last o these is the most controversial
as protoctists are very diverse and should be divided up into more
kingdoms. At present there is no consensus on how this should be done.

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Examples o classifcatio

Classifcation o one plant and one animal species rom
domain to species level.

Animals and plants are kingdoms o the domain Eukaryota. Table 2
shows the classication o one plant and one animal species rom
kingdom down to species.

taxon Grey wolf Dae palm
Kingdom Animalia Plantae
Phylum Chordata Angiospermophyta
Class Mammalia Monocotyledoneae
Order Carnivora Palmales
Family Canidae Arecaceae
Genus Canis Phoenix
Species lupus dactylifera

 Table 2

Daa-based quesions: Classiying cartilaginous fsh

All the sh shown in gure 6 are in the class 1 State the kingdom to which all o the species
Chondrichthyes. They are the most requently
ound sh in this class in north-west Europe. in gure 6 belong. [1 ]

2 a) Four o the sh in gure 6 are classied in
the same genus. Deduce which these sh
are. [1 ]

b) Deduce with a reason whether these our
sh are in:

(i) the same or dierent species [2]

(ii) the same or dierent amilies. [2]

c) State two characteristics o these our

sh that are not possessed by the other

our sh. [2]

3 The other our sh are classied into two

orders. Deduce, with a reason, how the our

 Figure 6 Cartilaginous fsh in seas in north-west Europe sh are split into two orders. [2]

natural classifcatio

In a natural classifcation, the genus and accompanying higher taxa consist o all the

species that have evolved rom one common ancestral species.

Scientic consensus is to classiy species in a way An example o an unnatural or articial
that most closely ollows the way in which species classication would be one in which birds, bats
evolved. Following this convention, all members and insects are grouped together, because they
o a genus or higher taxon should have a common all fy. Flight evolved separately in these groups
ancestor. This is called a natural classication. Because and as they do not share a common ancestor they
o the common ancestry we can expect the members dier in many ways. It would not be appropriate
o a natural group to share many characteristics. to classiy them together other than to place them

262

5.3 clAssiicAtion o BioDi vErsitY

all in the animal kingdom and both birds and bats distantly related organisms appear superfcially
in the phylum Chordata. Plants and ungi were at similar and adaptive radiation can make closely
one time classifed together, presumably because related organisms appear dierent. In the past,
they have cell walls and do not move, but this is natural classifcation was attempted by looking at
an artifcial classifcation as their cell walls evolved as many visible characteristics as possible, but new
separately and molecular research shows that they molecular methods have been introduced and these
are no more similar to each other than to animals. have caused signifcant changes to the classifcation
o some groups. More details o this are given later,
It is not always clear which groups o species do in sub-topic 5.4.
share a common ancestor, so natural classifcation
can be problematic. Convergent evolution can make

TOK

Wha a fuee he deepme  a e eu?

Carl Linnaeuss 1753 book Species Plantarum introduced genera and species. This was incorporated in the American
consistent two-part names (binomials) or all species o Rochester Code o1883 and in the code used at the Berlin
the vegetable kingdom then known. Thus the binomial Botaniches Museum and supported by British Museum o
Physalis angulata replaced the obsolete phrase-name, Natural History, Harvard University botanists and a group
oSwiss and Belgian botanists. The International Botanical
Physalis annua ramosissima, ramis angulosis glabris, Congress oVienna in 1905 accepted by 150 votes to 19
foliis dentato-serratis. Linnaeus brought the scientifc the rule that La nomenclature botanique commence avec
nomenclature oplants back to the simplicity and brevity Linn, Species Plantarum (ann. 1753) pour les groupes de
othe vernacular nomenclature out owhich it had grown. plantes vasculaires.
Folk-names or species rarely exceed three words. In
groups ospecies alike enough to have a vernacular 1 Why was Linnaeuss system or naming plants adopted
group-name, the species are oten distinguished by a as the international system, rather than any other
single name attached to the group-name, as in the Ancient system?
Greek    and   
(used by Threophrastus), Latin anagallis mas and anagallis 2 Why do the international rules onomenclature state
emina (used by Pliny), German weiss Seeblumen and geel that genus and species names must be in Ancient
Seeblumen (used by Fuchs), English wild mynte and water Greek or Latin?
mynte (used by Turner) and Malayan jambu bol and jambu
chilli (applied by Malays to dierent species oEugenia). 3 Making decisions by voting is rather unusual in science.
Why is it done at International Botanical Congresses?
The International Botanical Congress held in Genoa in 1892 What knowledge issues are associated with this
proposed that 1753 be taken as the starting point or both method odecision making?

reviewing classifcation

Taxonomists sometimes reclassiy groups o species
when new evidence shows that a previous taxon contains
species that have evolved rom dierent ancestral species.

Sometimes new evidence shows that members o a group do not share a
common ancestor, so the group should be split up into two or more taxa.
Conversely species classifed in dierent taxa are sometimes ound to
be closely related, so two or more taxa are united, or species are moved
rom one genus to another or between higher taxa.

The classifcation o humans has caused more controversy than any
other species. Using standard taxonomic procedures, humans are
assigned to the order Primates and the amily Hominidae. There has
been much debate about which, i any, o the great apes to include in
this amily. O riginally all the great apes were placed in another amily,

263

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

the Pongidae, but research has shown that chimpanzees and gorillas
are closer to humans than to orang-utans and so should be in the
same amily. This would j ust leave orang- utans in the Pongidae. Most
evidence suggests that chimpanzees are closer than gorillas to humans,
so i humans and chimpanzees are placed in dierent genera, gorillas
should also be in a separate genus. A summary o this scheme or human
classication is shown in gure 7.

FAM I LY Hominidae Pongidae

GENUS AND Gorilla Homo Pan Pan Po n g o
SPECIES gorilla sapiens troglodytes paniscus pygmaeus
( go ri l l a ) (human) (chimpanzee) (bonobo) ( o ra n g-u t a n )

 Figure 7 Classifcation o humans

 Figure 8 Members o the Hominidae advntges o nturl clssifction
and Pongidae
Natural classications help in identication o species
Ativity and allow the prediction o characteristics shared by
species within a group.
controlling potato blight
Phytophthora infestans, the There is great interest at the moment in the biodiversity o the world. Groups
organism that causes the disease o biologists are surveying areas where little research has been done beore,
potato blight, has hyphae and to nd out what species are present. Even in well-known parts o the world
was classied as a ungus, but new species are sometimes discovered. Natural classication o species is very
molecular biology has shown that it helpul in research into biodiversity. It has two specic advantages.
is not a true ungus and should be
classied in a dierent kingdom, 1 Identication o species is easier. I a specimen o an organism is
possibly the Protoctista. Potato ound and it is not obvious what species it is, the specimen can be
blight has proved to be a difcult identied by assigning it rst to its kingdom, then the phylum within
disease to control using ungicides. the kingdom, class within the phylum and so on down to species
Discuss reasons or this. level. Dichotomous keys can be used to help with this process. This
process would not work so well with an articial classication. For
264 example, i fowering plants were classied according to fower
colour and a white- fowered bluebell Hyacinthoides non-scripta
was discovered, it would not be identied correctly as the species
normally has blue fowers.

2 Because all o the members o a group in a natural classication
have evolved rom a common ancestral species, they inherit similar
characteristics. This allows prediction o the characteristics o species
within a group. For example, i a chemical that is useul as a drug
is ound in one plant in a genus, this or related chemicals are likely
to be ound in other species in the genus. I a new species o bat
was discovered, we could make many predictions about it with
reasonable certainty that they are correct: the bat will have hair,
mammary glands, a placenta, a our-chambered heart and many
other mammalian eatures. None o these predictions could be made
i bats were classied articially with all other fying organisms.

5.3 clAssificAtion of BioDi vErsitY

dichotomous keys

Construction o dichotomous keys or use in identiying specimens

Dichotomous keys are oten constructed to use or 1 Fore and hind limbs visible, can emerge on land ..... 2
identiying species within a group. A dichotomy Only ore limbs visible, cannot live on land ................ 6
is a division into two; a dichotomous key consists
o a numbered series o pairs o descriptions. One 2 Fore and hind limbs have paws ..................................... 3
o these should clearly match the species and Fore and hind limbs have fippers ................................. 4
the other should clearly be wrong. The eatures
that the designer o the key chooses to use in the 3 Fur is dark ............................................................ sea otters
descriptions should thereore be reliable and easily Fur is white ........................................................ polar bears
visible. Each o the pair o descriptions leads either
to another o the numbered pairs o descriptions 4 External ear fap visible ........... sea lions and ur seals
in the key, or to an identifcation. No external ear fap ........................................................... 5

An example o a key is shown in table 3 . We can 5 Two long tusks ..................................................... walruses
use it to identiy the species in fgure 9. In the frst No tusks ............................................................... true seals
stage o the key, we must decide i hind limbs are
visible. They are not, so we are directed to stage 6 Mouth breathing, no blowhole ... dugongs and manatees
6 o the key. We must now decide i the species Breathing through blowholes ......................................... 7
has a blowhole. It does not, so it is a dugong or a
manatee. A uller key would have another stage 7 Two blowholes, no teeth ......................... baleen whales
to separate dugongs and manatees. One blowhole, teeth ........ dolphins, porpoises and whales

 Table 3 Key to groups of marine mammals

Ay  Figure 9 Manatee

cug dhmu key

Keys are usually designed or use in a particular area. All the groups or species
that are ound in that area can be identied using the key. There may be a
group o organisms in your area or which a key has never been designed.

 You could design a key to the trees in the local orest or on your school
campus, using lea descriptions or bark descriptions.

 You could design a key to birds that visit bird-eeding stations in your area.

 You could design a key to the invertebrates that are associated with one
particular plant species.

 You could design a key to the ootprints o mammals and birds (gure 10) .
They are all right ront ootprints and are not shown to scale.

bear wolf fox cat dog

duck rabbit / hare squirrel deer heron

 Figure 10 Footprints of mammals and birds

265

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Plants

External recognition eatures o bryophytes, licinophytes, conierophytes

and angiospermophytes.

All plants are classied together in one kingdom. example is in one o the smaller phyla. The our
In the lie cycle o every plant, male and emale main plant phyla are:
gametes are ormed and use together. The zygote
ormed develops into an embryo. The way in  Bryophyta  mosses, liverworts and hornworts
which this embryo develops depends on the type
o plant it is. The dierent types o plants are put  Filicinophyta  erns
into phyla.
 Conierophyta  coniers
Most plants are in one o our phyla, but there
are other smaller phyla. The Ginkgo biloba tree or  Angiospermophyta  fowering plants.

The external recognition eatures o these phyla
are shown in table 4.

Bryophyta filiinophyta conierophyta Angiospermophyta

Vegetative organs  parts Rhizoids but no Roots, stems and leaves are usually present
o the plant concerned true roots. Some
with growth rather than with simple stems
reproduction and leaves; others
have only a thallus

Vascular tissue  tissues No xylem or Xylem and phloem are both present
with tubular structures used phloem
or transport within the plant

Cambium  cells between No cambium; no true trees and Present in coniers and most angiosperms,
xylem and phloem that shrubs allowing secondary thickening ostems and
can produce more o these roots and development oplants into trees
tissues and shrubs

Pollen  small structures Pollen is not produced Pollen is produced Pollen is produced
containing male gametes in male cones by anthers in
that are dispersed fowers

Ovules  contains a emale No ovaries or ovules Ovules are produced Ovules are enclosed
gamete and develops into a in emale cones inside ovaries in
seed ater ertilization
fowers

Seeds  dispersible unit No seeds Seeds are produced and dispersed
consisting o an embryo
plant and ood reserves,
inside a seed coat

Fruits  seeds together with No ruits Fruits produced or
a ruit wall developed rom dispersal o seeds
the ovary wall by mechanical, wind
or animal methods

 Table 4

266

5.3 clAssificAtion of BioDi vErsitY

animl phyl

Recognition eatures o poriera, cnidaria, platyhelminthes, annelida, mollusca and
arthropoda, chordata.

Animals are divided up into over 30 phyla, based on their characteristics. Six phyla are eatured in
table 5 . Two examples o each are shown in fgure 1 1 .

Phyum Muh/au symmey skee ohe exea
No mouth or None eg eaue
Poriera  an sponges, anus Internal spicules
cup sponges, tube (sketetal needles) Many pores over the surace
sponges, glass sponges Mouth only Radial through which water is drawn
Sot, but hard in or lter eeding. Very varied
Cnidaria  hydras, Mouth only Bilateral corals secrete shapes
jellysh, corals, sea CaCO3
anemones Mouth and Bilateral Tentacles arranged in rings
anus Sot, with no around the mouth, with stinging
Platyhelminthes  skeleton cells. Polyps or medusae
fatworms, fukes, Mouth and Bilateral (jellysh)
tapeworms anus Most have shell
Mollusca  bivalves, made o CaCO3 Flat and thin bodies in the shape
gastropods, snails, Mouth and Bilateral o a ribbon. No blood system or
chitons, squid, octopus anus Internal cavity system or gas exchange
with fuid under
Annelida  marine pressure A old in the body wall called
bristleworms, the mantle secretes the shell. A
oligochaetes, leeches External skeleton hard rasping radula is used or
made o plates o eeding
Arthropoda  insects, chitin
arachnids, crustaceans, Bodies made up o many ring-
myriapods shaped segments, oten with
bristles. Blood vessels oten
visible

Segmented bodies and legs or
other appendages with joints
between the sections

 Table 5 Characteristics of six animal phyla 3 List the organisms that have: [3]
[7] a) jointed appendages [2]
1 Study the organisms shown in fgure 1 1
and assign each one to its phylum. b) stinging tentacles

2 List the organisms that are: c) bristles.
a) bilaterally symmetric
b) radially symmetric 4 List the organisms that flter eed by
c) not symmetrical in their structure. [3] pumping water through tubes inside

their bodies.

267

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Adocia cinerea Alcyonium glomeratum vertebrates

Nymphon gracilis Pycnogonum littorale Recognition o eatures o birds, mammals, amphibians,
reptiles and fsh.
Corynactis viridis Lepidonotus clara
Most species o chordate belong to one o fve major classes, each o
Polymastia mammiliaris Cyanea capillata which contains more than a thousand species. Although the numbers
Procerodes littoralis are not certain and new species are still sometimes discovered, there
Loligo forbesii are about 1 0,000 bird species, 9,000 reptiles, 6,000 amphibians and
Arenicola marina 5,700 mammals. All o these classes are outnumbered by the ray-fnned
Prostheceraeus vittatus bony fsh, with more than 30,000 species. The recognition eatures o the
Caprella linearis fve largest classes o chordate are shown in table 6. All o the organisms
Gammarus locusta are vertebrates, because they have a backbone composed o vertebrae.

 Figure 11 Invertebrate diversity Bony ay- Amphibians reptiles Bids Mammals
fnned fsh
268 Sot moist I m p e rm e a b l e Skin with Skin has
Scales which skin skin covered
are bony permeable in scales o eathers made ollicles with
plates in the to water and keratin
skin gases o keratin hair made o

keratin

Gills covered Simple lungs Lungs with Lungs with Lungs with
by an with small extensive
operculum, olds and olding to para-bronchial alveoli,
with one gill moist skin or increase the
slit gas exchange surace area tubes, ventilated

ventilated using

using air sacs ribs and a

diaphragm

No limbs Tetrapods with pentadactyl limbs

Fins Four legs Four legs (in Two legs and Four legs in
supported by when adult most species) two wings most (or two
rays legs and two
wings/arms)

Eggs and sperm released or Sperm passed into the emale or internal

external ertilization ertilization

Remain Larval stage Female lays Female lays Most give
in water that lives in eggs with sot eggs with hard birth to live
throughout water and shells shells young and
their lie cycle adult that all eed
usually lives Teeth all o Beak but no young with
on land one type, with teeth milk rom
no living parts mammary
Swim bladder Eggs coated glands
containing gas in protective
or buoyancy jelly Teeth o
dierent
types with a
living core

Do not maintain constant body temperature Maintain constant body
temperature

 Table 6

5.4 clADistics

5.4 cad

udertdig applictio

 A clade is a group o organisms that have  Cladograms including humans and other
evolved rom a common ancestor. primates.

 Evidence or which species are part o a clade  Reclassifcation o the fgwort amily using
can be obtained rom the base sequences evidence rom cladistics.
o a gene or the corresponding amino acid
sequence o a protein. skill

 Sequence dierences accumulate gradually  Analysis o cladograms to deduce evolutionary
so there is a positive correlation between the relationships.
number o dierences between two species
and the time since they diverged rom a ntre of ciece
common ancestor.
 Falsifcation o theories with one theory being
 Traits can be analogous or homologous. superseded by another: plant amilies have
been reclassifed as a result o evidence rom
 Cladograms are tree diagrams that show the cladistics.
most probable sequence o divergence in
clades.

 Evidence rom cladistics has shown that
classifcations o some groups based
on structure did not correspond with the
evolutionary origins o a group o species.

Clde

A clade is a group o organisms that have evolved rom
a common ancestor.

Species can evolve over time and split to orm new species. This has
happened repeatedly with some highly successul species, so that
there are now large groups o species all derived rom a common
ancestor. These groups o species can be identifed by looking or shared
characteristics. A group o organisms evolved rom a common ancestor is
called a clade.

C lades include all the species alive today, together with the common
ancestral species and any species that evolved rom it and then became
extinct. They can be very large and include thousands o species, or
very small with j ust a ew. For example, birds orm one large clade with
about ten thousand living species because they have all evolved rom
a common ancestral species. The tree Ginkgo biloba is the only living
member o a clade that evolved about 270 million years ago. There have
been other species in this clade but all are now extinct.

269

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

Aciviy threatened or have close relatives. In some cases species
are the last members o a clade that has existed or tens
the EDGE of Exisence projec or hundreds o millions o years and it would be tragic or
them to become extinct as a result o human activities.
The aim o this project is to identiy animal species
that have ew or no close relatives and are thereore What species on EDGE lists are in your part o the world
members o very small clades. The conservation status and what can you do to help conserve them?
o these species is then assessed. Lists are prepared o
species that are both Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally http://www.edgeoexistence.org/species/
Endangered, hence the name o the project. Species
on these lists can then be targeted or more intense
conservation eforts than other species that are either not

 Figure 1 Two species on the EDGE list: Loris tardigradus tardigradus (Horton Plains slender loris) rom Sri Lanka and Bradypus
pygmaeus (Pygmy three-toed sloth) rom Isla Escudo de Veraguas, a small island of the coast o Panama

Identifying members of a clade

Evidence or which species are part o a clade can be
obtained rom the base sequences o a gene or the
corresponding amino acid sequence o a protein.

It is not always obvious which species have evolved from a common
ancestor and should therefore be included in a clade.
The most objective evidence comes from base sequences of genes or
amino acid sequences of proteins. Species that have a recent common
ancestor can be expected to have few differences in base or amino acid
sequence. C onversely, species that might look similar in certain respects
but diverged from a common ancestor tens of millions of years ago are
likely to have many differences.

270

5.4 clADistics

Moleculr clocks

Sequence diferences accumulate gradually so there is
a positive correlation between the number o diferences
between two species and the time since they diverged
rom a common ancestor.

Dierences in the base sequence o DNA and thereore in the amino
acid sequence o proteins are the result o mutations. They accumulate
gradually over long periods o time. There is evidence that mutations
occur at a roughly constant rate so they can be used as a molecular
clock. The number o dierences in sequence can be used to deduce how
long ago species split rom a common ancestor.

For example, mitochondrial DNA rom three humans European
and our related primates has been completely Japanese
sequenced. From the dierences in base sequence, a African
hypothetical ancestry has been constructed. It is shown Common chimpanzee
in fgure 2. Using dierences in base sequence as a Pygmy chimpanzee (bonobo)
molecular clock, these approximate dates or splits Gorilla
between groups have been deduced: Oran -utan

 70,000 years ago, EuropeanJapanese split

 1 40,000 years ago, AricanEuropean/Japanese split

 5,000,000 years ago, humanchimpanzee split  Figure 2

anlogous nd homologous trits

Traits can be analogous or homologous.

Similarities between organisms can either be homologous or analogous.

 Homologous structures are similar because o similar ancestry; or
example the chicken wing, human arm and other pentadactyl orelimbs.

 Analogous structures are similar because o convergent evolution. The
human eye and the octopus eye show similarities in structure and
unction but they are analogous because they evolved independently.

Problems in distinguishing between homologous and analogous
structures have sometimes led to mistakes in classifcation in the past.
For this reason the morphology (orm and structure) o organisms is
now rarely used or identiying members o a clade and evidence rom
base or amino acid sequences is trusted more.

cornea
iris

lens

retina
photoreceptors

optic nerve

 Figure 3 The human eye ( left) and the octopus eye (right) are analogous because they are
quite similar yet evolved independently

271

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

turtles Cladograms
lizards
snakes Cladograms are tree diagrams that show the most
birds probable sequence o divergence in clades.
non-avian
dinosaurs A cladogram is a tree diagram based on similarities and dierences between
crocodiles the species in a clade. Cladograms are almost always now based on base
or amino acid sequences. Computer programs have been developed that
ancestral species A calculate how species in a clade could have evolved with the smallest
ancestral species B number o changes o base or amino acid sequence. This is known as the
principle o parsimony and although it does not prove how a clade actually
ancestral species C evolved, it can indicate the most probable sequence o divergence in clades.

 Figure 4 A cladogram showing the The branching points on cladograms are called nodes. Usually two clades
hypothesized relationship between birds and branch o at a node but sometimes there are three or more. The node
the traditional taxonomic group the reptiles represents a hypothetical ancestral species that split to orm two or more
species. Option B includes instructions or constructing cladograms rom
Activity base sequences using computer sotware.

Figure 5 shows an artists impression Figure 4 is an example o a cladogram or birds and reptiles. It has been
o two pterosaurs, which were the rst based on morphology, so that extinct groups can be included.
chordates to develop powered fight.
They were neither birds nor dinosaurs.  Birds, non-avian dinosaurs and ancestral species A orm a clade
Where might pterosaurs have tted called dinosauria.
into the cladogram shown in gure 4?
 Birds, non-avian dinosaurs, crocodiles and ancestral species B are
part o a clade called archosaurs.

 Lizards, snakes and ancestral species C orm a clade called squamates.

This cladogram suggests either that birds should be regarded as reptiles
or that reptiles should be divided into two or more groups, as some
reptiles are more closely related to birds than to other reptiles.

 Figure 5 Two pterosaurs in fight 45,000

Primate cladograms 4.5 Myr ago

Cladograms including humans and 27,000
other primates.
1 Myr ago
The closest relatives o humans are chimpanzees
and bonobos. The entire genome o these three 12,000
species has been sequenced giving very strong
evidence or the construction o a cladogram Bonobo Chimpanzee Human
(fgure 6) . The numbers on the cladogram are
estimates o population sizes and dates when  Figure 6
splits occurred. These are based on a molecular
clock with a mutation rate o 1 0 9 yr 1.

Figure 7 is a cladogram or primates and the most
closely related other groups o mammal. Primates
are an order o mammals that have adaptations
or climbing trees. Humans, monkeys, baboons,
gibbons and lemurs are primates.

272

5.4 clADistics

anlysis of cldogrms Cavies and Coypu
Porcupines
Analysis o cladograms to deduce evolutionary Mice and Rats
relationships. Beavers
Chipmunks
The pattern o branching in a cladogram is assumed to match the Rabbits
evolutionary origins o each species. The sequence o splits at nodes is Primates
thereore a hypothetical sequence in which ancestors o existing clades Treeshrews
diverged. I two clades on a cladogram are linked at a node, they are
relatively closely related. I two species are only connected via a series  Figure 7
o nodes, they are less closely related.
Avy
Some cladograms include numbers to indicate numbers o dierences
in base or amino acid sequence or in genes. Because genetic changes A adogram for he grea ape
are assumed to occur at a relatively constant rate, these numbers can
be used to estimate how long ago two clades diverged. This method The great apes are a amily o
o estimating times is called a molecular clock. Some cladograms primates. The taxonomic name is
are drawn to scale according to estimates o how long ago each split Hominidae. There are fve species
occurred. on Earth today, all o which are
decreasing in number apart rom
Although cladograms can provide strong evidence or the evolutionary humans. Figure 6 is a cladogram
history o a group, they cannot be regarded as proo. Cladograms are or three o the species. Use
constructed on the assumption that the smallest possible number this inormation to expand the
o mutations occurred to account or current base or amino acid cladogram to include all the great
sequence dierences. Sometimes this assumption is incorrect apes: the split between humans
and pathways o evolution were more convoluted. It is thereore and gorillas occurred about
important to be cautious in analysis o cladograms and where possible 10 million years ago and the split
compare several versions that have been produced independently between humans and orang-
using dierent genes. utans about 15 million years ago.

Daa-baed queon: Origins of turtles and lizards

Cladograms based on morphology suggest the short-tailed opossum or to the duck-billed
that turtles and lizards are not a clade. To test
platypus. [2]

this hypothesis, microRNA genes have been 2 Calculate how many microRNA genes are
compared or nine species o chordate. The
results were used to construct the cladogram in ound in the mammal clade on the cladogram

but not in the other clades. [2]

fgure 8. The numbers on the cladogram show 3 Discuss whether the evidence in the
which microRNA genes are shared by members
o a clade but not members o other clades. For cladogram supports the hypothesis that turtles

and lizards are not a clade. [3]

example, there are six microRNA genes ound in 4 Evaluate the traditional classifcation o
humans and short-tailed opossums but not in any o
the other chordates on the cladogram. tetrapod chordates into amphibians, reptiles,

1 Deduce, using evidence rom the cladogram, birds and mammals using evidence rom the
whether humans are more closely related to
cladogram. [3]

273

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

African clawed frog

6 Human
3 Short-tailed opossum

Duck-billed platypus
340
671
761
885
1251
1397

186
590
873

490 145119 Zebra nch
1397 1460 Chicken
1467
1559
1567
1641
1669
1729
1743
1744
1756
1759
1781
1784
1789
1803
2131
2954
2964

1791
1
Alligator

1

1677 4 Painted turtle
Lizard
5390
5391
5392
5393

 Figure 8

Cladograms and reclassifcation

Evidence rom cladistics has shown that classifcations o
some groups based on structure did not correspond with
the evolutionary origins o a group o species.

The construction o cladograms based on base and amino acid sequences
only became possible towards the end o the 2 0th century. B eore that
the sequence data was not available and computer sotware had not
been developed to do the analysis. The construction o cladograms and
identifcation o clades is known as cladistics.

Cladistics has caused some revolutions in plant and animal
classifcation. It is now clear rom cladograms that traditional
classifcation based on morphology does not always match the
evolutionary origins o groups o species. As a result some groups have
been reclassifed. Some groups have been merged, others have been
divided and in some cases species have been transerred rom one
group to another.

Reclassifcation o groups o organisms is time-consuming and
potentially disruptive or biologists, but it is certainly worthwhile. The
new classifcations based on cladistics are likely to be much closer to
a truly natural classifcation so their predictive value will be higher.
They have revealed some unnoticed similarities between groups and
also some signifcant dierences between species previously assumed
to be similar.

274

5.4 clADistics

Cladograms and alsifcation

Falsifcation o theories with one theory being
superseded by another: plant amilies have been
reclassifed as a result o evidence rom cladistics.

The reclassifcation o plants on the basis o discoveries in cladistics
is a good example o an important process in science: the testing o
theories and o replacement o theories ound to be alse with new
theories. The classifcation o angiospermophytes into amilies based
on their morphology was begun by the French botanist Antoine
Laurent de Jussieu in Genera plantarum, published in 1 789 and
revised repeatedly during the 1 9th century.

Classifcation o the fgwort amily

Reclassifcation o the fgwort amily using evidence rom cladistics.

There are more than 400 amilies o angiosperms. Taxonomists recently investigated the
Until recently the eighth largest was the evolutionary origins o the fgwort amily
Scrophulariaceae, commonly known as the using cladistics. One important research project
fgwort amily. It was one o the original amilies compared the base sequences o three chloroplast
proposed by de Jussieu in 1 789. He gave it the genes in a large number o species in genera
name Scrophulariae and included sixteen genera, traditionally assigned to the Scrophulariaceae and
based on similarities in their morphology. As genera in closely related amilies. It was ound
more plants were discovered, the amily grew that species in the fgwort amily were not a true
until there were over 275 genera, with more than clade and that fve clades had incorrectly been
5,000 species. combined into one amily.

Two small families were merged
with the gwort family:

the buddleja family, Buddlejaceae
and the myoporum family, Myoporaceae

Two genera were moved to The gwort Nearly fty genera have
a newly-created family, family been moved to the
the calceolaria family, plantain family,
Calceolariaceae Scrophulariaceae Plantaginaceae

Thirteen genera have been About twelve genera of
transferred to a newly-created parasitic plants have been
moved to the broomrape
family, the lindernia family,
Linderniaceae family, Orobanchaceae

 Figure 9

275

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

A major reclassifcation has now been carried out. changes is shown in fgure 9. This reclassifcation
Less than hal o the species have been retained has been welcomed as it was widely appreciated
in the amily, which is now only the thirty-sixth beore that the Scrophulariaceae had been a rag-bag
largest among the angiosperms. A summary o the o species rather than a natural group.

 Figure 10 Antirrhinum majus has been transerred rom the  Figure 11 Scrophularia peregrina has remained in the
fgwort amily to the plantain amily fgwort amily

276

QuEstions

Questions% increase in algal volume 4 Which o the ollowing processes are required or
copper tolerance to develop in a population?
The bar charts in fgure 1 2 show the growth o (i) variation in copper tolerance
three populations o an alga, Ectocarpus siliculosus, (ii) inheritance o copper tolerance
at dierent copper concentrations. One population (iii) ailure o algae with lower copper
came rom an unpolluted environment at tolerance to survive or reproduce.
Rhosneigr in Wales. The other two came rom the a) i) only
undersides o ships that had been painted with a b) i) and ii) only
copper-containing anti-ouling paint. c) i) and iii) only
d) i) , ii) and iii) .
500 Rhosneigr

0
M.V. San Nicholas

500

0 5 In fgure 1 3, each number represents a
M.V. Amama species. The closer that two numbers are on
the diagram the more similar the two species.
500 The circles represent taxonomic groups. For
example, the diagram shows that 2, 3, 4 and
0 5 are in the same genus.
0.0 0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0 5.0 10.0

concentration of copper ( mg dm-3)

Figure 12

1 How much higher was the maximum copper 1 23 34
concentration tolerated by the algae rom 45
ships than the algae rom an unpolluted 67
environment?

a) 0.09 times higher b) 0.1 1 times higher 8

c) 1 .0 times higher d) 1 0 times higher. 9 10 11311142
15 16
19 17 18 24 25
20 21 26 27
2 What is the reason or results lower than zero 28 29
on the bar charts? 22
23 30
a) The volume o algae decreased.
31 32
b) The algae all died. 33

c) Increases in volume were less than 1 00%. Figure 13

d) Results were too small to measure a) State one species that is in a genus [1 ]
a c c u r a te l y. with no other species.

b) State the species that are in a amily [2]
with two genera.

3 What was the reason or the dierence in c) State the species that are in an order [2]
copper tolerance between the algae? with two amilies.

a) The algae on the ships absorbed copper. d) State the species that are in a class with

b) The algae can develop copper tolerance and three orders. [2]
pass it on to their ospring.
e) Deduce whether species 8 is more closely
c) The copper in the paint caused mutations. related to species 1 6 or species 6.

d) The copper in the paint caused natural f) Explain why three concentric circles have
selection or higher levels o copper tolerance.
been drawn around species 34 on the

diagram. [2]

277

51 E vo l u t i o n an d b i o d i vE r s i t y

6 The map in gure 1 4 shows the distribution Key
in the 1 95 0s o two orms o Biston betularia Non-melanic
in B ritain and Ireland. Biston betularia is a Melanic
species o moth that fies at night. It spends
the daytime roosting on the bark o trees. The
non-melanic orm has white wings, peppered
with black spots. The melanic orm has black
wings. Beore the industrial revolution, the
melanic orm was very rare. The prevailing
wind direction is rom the Atlantic Ocean, to
the west.

a) State the maximum and minimum [2]
percentages o the melanic orm.

b) Outline the trends in the distribution o

the two orms o Biston betularia, shown

in gure 1 4. [2]

c) Explain how natural selection can cause

moths such as Biston betularia to develop

camoufaged wing markings. [4] Figure 14

d) Suggest reasons or the distribution o

the two orms. [2]

278

6 HUmAN pHySIology

Intrductin products. The skin and immune system resist the
continuous threat of invasion by pathogens. The
Research into human physiology is the lungs are actively ventilated to ensure that gas
foundation of modern medicine. Body functions exchange can occur passively. Neurons transmit
are carried out by specialized organ systems. the message, synapses modulate the message.
The structure of the wall of the small intestine Hormones are used when signals need to be
allows it to move, digest and absorb food. The widely distributed.
blood system continuously transports substances
to cells and simultaneously collects waste

6.1 Digestion and absorption

Understandin Aicatins

 The contraction o circular and longitudinal  Processes occurring in the small intestine that
muscle layers o the small intestine mixes the result in the digestion o starch and transport o
ood with enzymes and moves it along the gut. the products o digestion to the liver.

 The pancreas secretes enzymes into the lumen  Use o dialysis tubing to model absorption o
o the small intestine. digested ood in the intestine.

 Enzymes digest most macromolecules in ood Skis
into monomers in the small intestine.
 Production o an annotated diagram o the
 Villi increase the surace area o epithelium digestive system.
over which absorption is carried out.
 Identication o tissue layers in transverse
 Villi absorb monomers ormed by digestion as sections o the small intestine viewed with a
well as mineral ions and vitamins. microscope or in a micrograph.

 Diferent methods o membrane transport are Nature f science
required to absorb diferent nutrients.
 Use models as representations o the real
world: dialysis tubing can be used to model
absorption in the intestine.

279

61 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

Structure of the digestive system

Production of an annotated diagram of the digestive system.

The part of the human body used for digestion Surfactants and other enzymes are secreted
can be described in simple terms as a tube by accessory glands that have ducts leading
through which food passes from the mouth to to the digestive system. Controlled, selective
the anus. The role of the digestive system is to absorption of the nutrients released by digestion
break down the diverse mixture of large carbon takes place in the small intestine and colon, but
compounds in food, to yield ions and smaller some small molecules, notably alcohol, diffuse
compounds that can be absorbed. For proteins, through the stomach lining before reaching the
lipids and polysaccharides digestion involves small intestine.
several stages that occur in different parts of
the gut. Figure 1 is a diagram of the human digestive
system. The part of the esophagus that passes
Digestion requires surfactants to break up lipid through the thorax has been omitted. This
droplets and enzymes to catalyse reactions. diagram can be annotated to indicate the
Glandular cells in the lining of the stomach functions of different parts. A summary of
and intestines produce some of the enzymes. functions is given in table 1 below.

mouth Structure Function
Mouth
esophagus Voluntary control of eating and
Esophagus swallowing. Mechanical digestion
gall bladder Stomach of food by chewing and mixing with
liver saliva, which contains lubricants and
stomach Small intestine enzymes that start starch digestion
pancreas
small intestine Pancreas Movement of food by peristalsis
Liver from the mouth to the stomach
large intestine Gall bladder
anus Large intestine Churning and mixing with secreted
water and acid which kills foreign
 Figure 1 The human digestive system  Table 1 bacteria and other pathogens in
food, plus initial stages of protein
digestion

Final stages of digestion of lipids,
carbohydrates, proteins and nucleic
acids, neutralizing stomach acid,
plus absorption of nutrients

Secretion of lipase, amylase and
protease

Secretion of surfactants in bile to
break up lipid droplets

Storage and regulated release of bile

Re-absorption of water,
further digestion especially of
carbohydrates by symbiotic
bacteria, plus formation and storage
of feces

280

6.1 DigeStion anD abSorption

Structure of the wall of the small intestine

Identifcation o tissue layers in transverse sections o the small intestine viewed
with a microscope or in a micrograph.

The wall o the small intestine is made o layers
o living tissues, which are usually quite easy
to distinguish in sections o the wall. From the
outside o the wall going inwards there are
our layers:

 serosa  an outer coat

 muscle layers  longitudinal muscle and inside
it circular muscle

 sub-mucosa  a tissue layer containing blood
and lymph vessels

 mucosa  the lining o the small intestine,  Figure 2 Longitudinal section through the wall o the small
with the epithelium that absorbs nutrients on intestine. Folds are visible on the inner surace and on
its inner surace. these olds are fnger-like projections called villi. All o the
our main tissue layers are visible, including both circular
and longitudinal parts o the muscle layer. The mucosa is
stained darker than the sub-mucosa

peristalsis acvy

The contraction o circular and longitudinal muscle layers tssu l dms f h
o the small intestine mixes the ood with enzymes and s wll
moves it along the gut.
To practice your skill at
The circular and longitudinal muscle in the wall o the gut is identiying tissue layers,
smooth muscle rather than striated muscle. It consists o relatively short draw a plan diagram o the
cells, not elongated fbres. It oten exerts continuous moderate orce, tissues in the longitudinal
interspersed with short periods o more vigorous contraction, rather section o the intestine wall
than remaining relaxed unless stimulated to contract. in fgure 2. To test your skill
urther, draw a plan diagram
Waves o muscle contraction, called peristalsis, pass along the intestine. to predict how the tissues
Contraction o circular muscles behind the ood constricts the gut to o the small intestine would
prevent it rom being pushed back towards the mouth. Contraction o appear in a transverse
longitudinal muscle where the ood is located moves it on along the gut. section.
The contractions are controlled unconsciously not by the brain but by
the enteric nervous system, which is extensive and complex.

Swallowed ood moves quickly down the esophagus to the stomach in
one continuous peristaltic wave. Peristalsis only occurs in one direction,
away rom the mouth. When ood is returned to the mouth rom the
stomach during vomiting, abdominal muscles are used rather than the
circular and longitudinal muscle in the gut wall.

In the intestines the ood is moved only a ew centimetres at a time so
the overall progression through the intestine is much slower, allowing
time or digestion. The main unction o peristalsis in the intestine is
churning o the semi-digested ood to mix it with enzymes and thus
speed up the process o digestion.

281

16 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

 Figure 3 Three-dimensional image showing pancreatic juice
the wave of muscle contraction (brown) in the
esophagus during swallowing. Green indicates The pancreas secretes enzymes into the lumen of the
when the muscle is exerting less force. Time small intestine.
is shown left to right. At the top the sphincter
between the mouth and the esophagus is The pancreas contains two types o gland tissue. Small groups o cells secrete
shown permanently constricted apart from a the hormones insulin and glucagon into the blood. The remainder o the
brief opening when swallowing starts pancreas synthesizes and secretes digestive enzymes into the gut in response
to eating a meal. This is mediated by hormones synthesized and secreted
by the stomach and also by the enteric nervous system. The structure o
the tissue is shown in fgure 4. Small groups o gland cells cluster round the
ends o tubes called ducts, into which the enzymes are secreted.

The digestive enzymes are synthesized in pancreatic gland cells on ribosomes
on the rough endoplasmic reticulum. They are then processed in the Golgi
apparatus and secreted by exocytosis. Ducts within the pancreas merge into
larger ducts, fnally orming one pancreatic duct, through which about a litre
o pancreatic juice is secreted per day into the lumen o the small intestine.

Pancreatic juice contains enzymes that digest all the three main types o
macromolecule ound in ood:

 amylase to digest starch

 lipases to digest triglycerides, phospholipids

 proteases to digest proteins and peptides.

secretory vesicles Digestion in the small intestine

one acinus Enzymes digest most macromolecules in food into
monomers in the small intestine.

The enzymes secreted by the pancreas into the lumen o the
small intestine carry out these hydrolysis reactions:

secretory cells basement membrane  starch is digested to maltose by amylase

wall of duct  triglycerides are digested to atty acids and glycerol or atty
acids and monoglycerides by lipase
lumen of duct
 phospholipids are digested to atty acids, glycerol and
 Figure 4 Arrangement of cells and ducts in a part of phosphate by phospholipase
the pancreas that secretes digestive enzymes
 proteins and polypeptides are digested to shorter peptides by
protease.

This does not complete the process o digestion into molecules small
enough to be absorbed. The wall o the small intestine produces
a variety o other enzymes, which digest more substances. Some
enzymes produced by gland cells in the intestine wall may be secreted
in intestinal juice but most remain immobilized in the plasma
membrane o epithelium cells lining the intestine. They are active
there and continue to be active when the epithelium cells are abraded
o the lining and mixed with the semi-digested ood.

 Nucleases digest DNA and RNA into nucleotides.

 Maltase digests maltose into glucose.

282

6.1 DigeStion anD abSorption

 Lactase digests lactose into glucose and galactose.

 Sucrase digests sucrose into glucose and ructose.

 Exopeptidases are proteases that digest peptides by removing single
amino acids either rom the carboxy or amino terminal o the chain
until only a dipeptide is let.

 Dipeptidases digest dipeptides into amino acids.

Because o the great length o the small intestine, ood takes hours to  Figure 5 Cystic fbrosis causes the pancreatic
pass through, allowing time or digestion o most macromolecules to duct to become blocked by mucus. Pills
be completed. Some substances remain largely undigested, because containing synthetic enzymes help digestion in
humans cannot synthesize the necessary enzymes. Cellulose or example the small intestine. The photograph shows one
is not digested and passes on to the large intestine as one o the main days supply or a person with cystic fbrosis
components o dietary fbre.

Villi and the surface area for digestion

Villi increase the surface area of epithelium over which

absorption is carried out.

The process o taking substances into cells and the blood is called

absorption. In the human digestive system nutrients are absorbed epithelium
principally in the small intestine. The rate o absorption depends on

the surace area o the epithelium that carries out the process. The

small intestine in adults is approximately seven metres long and layer of microvilli lacteal (a branch
ofthe lymphatic
2 5 3 0 millimetres wide and there are olds on its inner surace, giving on surface of system)

a large surace area. This area is increased by the presence o villi. epithelium

Villi are small fnger-like proj ections o the mucosa on the inside o the blood capillary
intestine wall. A villus is between 0.5 and 1 .5 mm long and there can
be as many as 40 o them per square millimetre o small intestine wall.
They increase the surace area by a actor o about 1 0.

Absorption by villi goblet cells
(secrete mucus)

Villi absorb monomers formed by digestion as well as  Figure 6 Structure o an intestinal villus
mineral ions and vitamins.

The epithelium that covers the villi must orm a barrier to harmul
substances, while at the same time being permeable enough to allow
useul nutrients to pass through.

Villus cells absorb these products o digestion o macromolecules in ood:

 glucose, ructose, galactose and other monosaccharides

 any o the twenty amino acids used to make proteins

 atty acids, monoglycerides and glycerol

 bases rom digestion o nucleotides.

They also absorb substances required by the body and present in oods
but not needing digestion:

 mineral ions such as calcium, potassium and sodium  Figure 7 Scanning electron micrograph o villi
 vitamins such as ascorbic acid (vitamin C) . in the small intestine

283

61 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

Some harmul substances pass through the epithelium and are
subsequently removed rom the blood and detoxied by the liver. S ome
harmless but unwanted substances are also absorbed, including many
o those that give ood its colour and favour. These pass out in urine.
Small numbers o bacteria pass through the epithelium but are quickly
removed rom the blood by phagocytic cells in the liver.

methods of absorption

Diferent methods o membrane transport are required to
absorb diferent nutrients.

To be absorbed into the body, nutrients must pass rom the lumen o
the small intestine to the capillaries or lacteals in the villi. The nutrients
must rst be absorbed into epithelium cells through the exposed
part o the plasma membrane that has its surace area enlarged with
microvilli. The nutrients must then pass out o this cell through the
plasma membrane where it aces inwards towards the lacteal and blood
capillaries o the villus.

Many dierent mechanisms move nutrients into and out o the villus
epithelium cells: simple diusion, acilitated diusion, active transport
and exocytosis. These methods can be illustrated using two dierent
examples o absorption: triglycerides and glucose.

 Triglycerides must be digested beore they can be absorbed. The
products o digestion are atty acids and monoglycerides, which can
be absorbed into villus epithelium cells by simple diusion as they
can pass between phospholipids in the plasma membrane.

 Fatty acids are also absorbed by acilitated diusion as there are atty
acid transporters, which are proteins in the membrane o the microvilli.

 Once inside the epithelium cells, atty acids are combined with
monoglycerides to produce triglycerides, which cannot diuse back
out into the lumen.

lumen of villus epithelium interior
small intestine of villus

Na+ low Na+ 3Na+ blood
concentration capillary
glucose 2K+
fatty acids and glucose
monoglycerides

lacteal

triglyceride lipoprotein

 Figure 8 Methods of absorption in the small intestine

284

6.1 DigeStion anD abSorption

 Triglycerides coalesce with cholesterol to orm droplets with a
diameter o about 0.2 m, which become coated in phospholipids
and protein.

 These lipoprotein particles are released by exocytosis through the
plasma membrane on the inner side o the villus epithelium cells.
They then either enter the lacteal and are carried away in the lymph,
or enter the blood capillaries in the villi.

 Glucose cannot pass through the plasma membrane by simple
diusion because it is polar and thereore hydrophilic.

 Sodiumpotassium pumps in the inwards-acing part o the plasma
membrane pump sodium ions by active transport rom the cytoplasm
to the interstitial spaces inside the villus and potassium ions in the
opposite direction. This creates a low concentration o sodium ions
inside villus epithelium cells.

 Sodiumglucose co-transporter proteins in the microvilli transer
a sodium ion and a glucose molecule together rom the intestinal
lumen to the cytoplasm o the epithelium cells. This type o
acilitated diusion is passive but it depends on the concentration
gradient o sodium ions created by active transport.

 Glucose channels allow the glucose to move by acilitated diusion
rom the cytoplasm to the interstitial spaces inside the villus and on
into blood capillaries in the villus.

Starch digestion in the small intestine

Processes occurring in the small intestine that result in the digestion of starch and
transport of the products of digestion to the liver.

Starch digestion illustrates some important CH2OH CH2OH
processes including catalysis, enzyme specifcity
and membrane permeability. S tarch is a O O
macromolecule, composed o many -glucose OH OH
monomers linked together in plants by
condensation reactions. It is a major constituent OH O O CH2OH CH2OH
o plant-based oods such as bread, potatoes and OH
pasta. Starch molecules cannot pass through OH O O
membranes so must be digested in the small CH2OH OH OH
intestine to allow absorption. O CH2
O
All o the reactions involved in the digestion o OH
starch are exothermic, but without a catalyst they OH
happen at very slow rates. There are two types o
molecule in starch: OH O O O O
OH OH OH OH
 amylose has unbranched chains o -glucose
linked by 1 ,4 bonds;  Figure 9 Small portion of an amylopectin molecule showing
six -glucose molecules, all linked bv 1,4 bonds apart from
 amylopectin has chains o -glucose linked one 1,6 bond that creates a branch
by 1 ,4 bonds, with some 1 ,6 bonds that make
the molecule branched. The enzyme that begins the digestion o both
orms o starch is amylase. Saliva contains
amylase but most starch digestion occurs in the
small intestine, catalysed by pancreatic amylase.
Any 1 ,4 bond in starch molecules can be broken
by this enzyme, as long as there is a chain o at
least our glucose monomers. Amylose is thereore

285

61 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

digested into a mixture o two- and three-glucose capillaries close to the epithelium ensures that
ragments called maltose and maltotriose. glucose only has to travel a short distance to
enter the blood system. Capillary walls consist o
Because o the specicity o its active site, amylase a single layer o thin cells, with pores between
cannot break 1 ,6 bonds in amylopectin. Fragments adjacent cells, but these capillaries have larger
o the amylopectin molecule containing a pores than usual, aiding the entry o glucose.
1 ,6 bond that amylase cannot digest are called
dextrins. Digestion o starch is completed by Blood carrying glucose and other products o
three enzymes in the membranes o microvilli digestion fows though villus capillaries to venules
on villus epithelium cells. Maltase, glucosidase in the sub-mucosa o the wall o the small
and dextrinase digest maltose, maltotriose and intestine. The blood in these venules is carried
dextrins into glucose. via the hepatic portal vein to the liver, where
excess glucose can be absorbed by liver cells and
Glucose is absorbed into villus epithelium cells converted to glycogen or storage. Glycogen is
by co-transport with sodium ions. It then moves similar in structure to amylopectin, but with
by acilitated diusion into the fuid in interstitial more 1 ,6 bonds and thereore more extensive
spaces inside the villus. The dense network o branching.

modelling physiological processes

Use models as representations of the real world: dialysis tubing can be used
to model absorption in the intestine.

Living systems are complex and when
experiments are done on them, many actors can
infuence the results. It can be very dicult to
control all o the variables and analysis o results
becomes dicult. Sometimes it is better to carry
out experiments using only parts o systems. For
example, much research in physiology has been
carried out using clones o cells in tissue culture
rather than whole organisms.

Another approach is to use a model to represent  Figure 10 The Dynamic Gastric Model with its inventor, Richard
part o a living system. B ecause it is much simpler, Faulks, adjusting the antrum mechanism
a model can be used to investigate specic aspects
o a process. A recent example is the Dynamic mimic the wall o the gut, which is also more
Gastric Model, a computer-controlled model o permeable to small rather than large particles.
the human stomach that carries out mechanical Dialysis tubing can be used to model absorption
and chemical digestion o real ood samples. It can by passive diusion and by osmosis. It cannot
be used to investigate the eects o diet, drugs, model active transport and other processes that
alcohol and other actors on digestion. occur in living cells

A simpler example is the use o dialysis tubing
made rom cellulose. Pores in the tubing allow
water and small molecules or ions to pass through
reely, but not large molecules. These properties

286

6.1 DigeStion anD abSorption

modelling the sall intestine

Use of dialysis tubing to model absorption of digested food in the intestine.

To make a model o the small intestine, cut a Suggest improvements to the method, or suggest
length o dialysis tubing and seal one end by tying an entirely dierent method o investigating the
a knot in the tubing or tying with a piece o cotton need or digestion.
thread. Pour in a suitable mixture o oods and
seal the open end by tying with a piece o cotton 2 Investigating membrane permeability using
thread. Two experiments using model intestines a model of the small intestine
made in this way are suggested here:
Cola drinks contain a mixture o substances
1 Investigating the need for digestion using with dierent particle sizes. They can be used
a model of the small intestine to represent ood in the small intestine. Dialysis
tubing is semi-permeable so can be used to model
Set up the apparatus shown in gure 1 1 and leave the wall o the small intestine.
it or one hour.
Predictions
Results
Cola contains glucose, phosphoric acid and
To obtain the results or the experiment, take caramel, a complex carbohydrate added to
the bags out o each tube, open them and pour produce a brown colour. Predict which o these
the solutions rom them into separate test tubes substances will diuse out o the bag, with reasons
rom the liquids in the tubes. You should now or your predictions. Predict whether the bag will
have our samples o fuid. Divide each o these gain or lose mass during the experiment.
samples into two halves and test one hal or
starch and the other hal or sugars. I n s tru cti o n s

1 Make the model intestine with cola inside.

2 Rinse the outside o the bag to wash o any
traces o cola and then dry the bag.

10 ml 10 ml of cola, left to go at tube
of 1% 1% starch before being put top of bag sealed
starch solution with cotton thread
solution and 1 ml into the tube
and 1 ml of 1% dialysis tubing
of water amylase pure water 
solution minimum volume base of bag knotted
to surround the bag to prevent leaks
water
maintained
at 40C

water bags made water
of dialysis
(Visking) tubing

 Figure 11 Apparatus for showing the need for digestion

Record all the results in the way that you think is spotting
most appropriate. tile

Conclusions and evaluation pH indicator

State careully all the conclusions that you can  Figure 12 Apparatus for membrane permeability experiment
make rom your results.
287
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses o this
method o investigating the need or digestion.

61 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

3 Find the mass o the bag using an electronic vary or these test strips. Follow the
balance. instructions and work out the glucose
concentration o the water.
4 When you are ready to start the experiment,
place the bag in pure water in a test tube. 6 Ater testing the water or the last time,
remove the bag, dry it and fnd its mass again
5 Test the water around the bag at suitable time with the electronic balance.
intervals. A suggested range is 1 , 2, 4, 8 and
1 6 minutes. At each time lit the bag up and Conclusions
down a ew times to mix the water in the
tube, then do these tests: a) Explain the conclusions that you can draw

 Look careully at the water to see whether about the permeability o the dialysis tubing
it is still clear or has become brown.
rom the tests o the water and rom the
 Use a dropping pipette to remove a ew
drops o the water and test them in a change in mass o the bag. [5]
spotting tile with a narrow-range pH
indicator. Use a colour chart to work out b) Compare and contrast the dialysis tubing
the pH.
and the plasma membranes that carry out
 Dip a glucose test strip into the water and
record the colour that it turns. Instructions absorption in villus epithelium cells in the

wall o the intestine. [5]

c) Use the results o your experiment to predict

the direction o movement o water by

osmosis across villus epithelium cells. [5]

TOK

What are some o the variables that afect perspectives as to what is normal?

In some adult humans, levels o lactase are too low continue to consume milk into adulthood are thereore
to digest lactose in milk adequately. Instead, lactose unusual. Inability to consume milk because o lactose
passes through the small intestine into the large intolerance should not thereore be regarded as abnormal.
intestine, where bacteria eed on it, producing carbon
dioxide, hydrogen and methane. These gases cause The second argument is a simple mathematical one: a
some unpleasant symptoms, discouraging consumption high proportion o humans are lactose intolerant.
o milk. The condition is known as lactose intolerance. It
has sometimes in the past been regarded as an abnormal The third argument is evolutionary. Our ancestors were
condition, or even as a disease, but it could be argued almost certainly all lactose intolerant, so this is the
that lactose intolerance is the normal human condition. natural or normal state. Lactose tolerance appears
to have evolved separately in at least three centres:
The rst argument or this view is a biological one. Female Northern Europe, parts o Arabia, the Sahara and eastern
mammals produce milk to eed their young ofspring. Sudan, and parts o East Arica inhabited by the Tutsi and
When a young mammal is weaned, solid oods replace Maasai peoples. Elsewhere, tolerance is probably due to
milk and lactase secretion declines. Humans who migration rom these centres.

288

6.2 the blooD SyStem

6.2 t d ss

Understanding Applications

 Arteries convey blood at high pressure rom the  William Harveys discovery o the circulation o
ventricles to the tissues o the body. the blood with the heart acting as the pump.

 Arteries have muscle and elastic bres in  Causes and consequences o occlusion o the
their walls. coronary arteries.

 The muscle and elastic bres assist in  Pressure changes in the let atrium, let
maintaining blood pressure between pump ventricle and aorta during the cardiac cycle.
cycles.
Skills
 Blood fows through tissues in capillaries
with permeable walls that allow exchange o  Identication o blood vessels as arteries,
materials between cells in the tissue and the capillaries or veins rom the structure o
blood in the capillary. their walls.

 Veins collect blood at low pressure rom the  Recognition o the chambers and valves o
tissues o the body and return it to the atria o the heart and the blood vessels connected
the heart. to it in dissected hearts or in diagrams o
heart structure.
 Valves in veins and the heart ensure circulation
o blood by preventing backfow. Nature of science

 There is a separate circulation or the lungs.  Theories are regarded as uncertain: William
Harvey overturned theories developed by the
 The heartbeat is initiated by a group o ancient Greek philosopher Galen on movement
specialized muscle cells in the right atrium o blood in the body.
called the sinoatrial node.

 The sinoatrial node acts as a pacemaker.

 The sinoatrial node sends out an electrical
signal that stimulates contraction as it is
propagated through the walls o the atria and
then the walls o the ventricles.

 The heart rate can be increased or
decreased by impulses brought to the
heart through two nerves rom the medulla
o the brain.

 Epinephrine increases the heart rate to prepare
or vigorous physical activity.

289

16 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

William Harvey and the circulatin f bld

William Harveys discovery of the circulation of the blood with the heart acting
as the pump.

William Harvey is usually credited with the published his theory about the circulation o blood
discovery o the circulation o the blood as in 1 628. It was not until 1 660, ater his death,
he combined earlier discoveries with his own that blood was seen fowing rom arteries to veins
research ndings to produce a convincing overall though capillaries as he had predicted.
theory or blood fow in the body. He overcame
widespread opposition by publishing his results
and also by touring Europe to demonstrate
experiments that alsied previous theories and
provided evidence or his theory. As a result his
theory became generally accepted.

Harvey demonstrated that blood fow through
the larger vessels is unidirectional, with valves
to prevent backfow. He also showed that the
rate o fow through major vessels was ar too
high or blood to be consumed in the body ater
being pumped out by the heart, as earlier theories
proposed. It must thereore return to the heart
and be recycled. Harvey showed that the heart
pumps blood out in the arteries and it returns in
veins. He predicted the presence o numerous ne
vessels too small to be seen with contemporary
equipment that linked arteries to veins in the
tissues o the body.

Blood capillaries are too narrow to be seen with  Figure 1 Harveys experiment to demonstrate that blood fow
the naked eye or with a hand lens. Microscopes in the veins o the arm is unidirectional
had not been invented by the time that Harvey

overturning ancient theries in science

Theories are regarded as uncertain: William Harvey overturned theories developed
by the ancient Greek philosopher Galen on movement of blood in the body.

During the Renaissance, interest was reawakened vital spirits are distributed to the body by the
in the classical writings o Greece and Rome. This arteries. Some o the vital spirits fow to the brain,
stimulated literature and the arts, but in some to be converted into animal spirits, which are
ways it hampered progress in science. It became then distributed by the nerves to the body.
almost impossible to question the doctrines o
such writers as Aristotle, Hippocrates, Ptolemy William Harvey was unwilling to accept these
and Galen. doctrines without evidence. He made careul
observations and did experiments, rom which
According to Galen, blood is ormed in the liver he deduced that blood circulates through the
and is pumped to and ro between the liver and pulmonary and systemic circulations. He predicted
the right ventricle o the heart. A little blood the existence o capillaries, linking arteries and
passes into the let ventricle, where it meets air veins, even though the lenses o the time were
rom the lungs and becomes vital spirits. The not powerul enough or him to see them.

290

6.2 the blooD SyStem

The ollowing extract is rom Harveys book On the others: without which no one can properly
Generation of Animals, published in 1 65 1 when he become a student of any branch of natural
was 73. science. I would not have you therefore,
gentle reader, to take anything on trust
And hence it is that without the due from me concerning the Generation of
admonition of the senses, without frequent Animals: I appeal to your own eyes as
observation and reiterated experiment, my witness and judge. The method of
our mind goes astray after phantoms pursuing truth commonly pursued at this
and appearances. Diligent observation is time therefore is to be held erroneous and
therefore requisite in every science, and almost foolish, in which so many enquire
the senses are frequently to be appealed what things others have said, and omit
to. We are, I say, to strive after personal to ask whether the things themselves be
experience, not to rely of the experience of actually so or not.

Arteries acivi

Arteries convey blood at high pressure rom the ventricles Discussin qusins n
to the tissues o the body. Wii hrvs ds

Arteries are vessels that convey blood rom the heart to the tissues o 1 William Harvey reused
the body. The main pumping chambers o the heart are the ventricles. to accept doctrines
They have thick strong muscle in their walls that pumps blood into the without evidence. Are
arteries, reaching a high pressure at the peak o each pumping cycle. there academic contexts
The artery walls work with the heart to acilitate and control blood fow. where it is reasonable to
Elastic and muscle tissue in the walls are used to do this. accept doctrines on the
basis o authority rather
Elastic tissue contains elastin bres, which store the energy that stretches than evidence gathered
them at the peak o each pumping cycle. Their recoil helps propel the rom primary sources?
blood on down the artery. C ontraction o smooth muscle in the artery
wall determines the diameter o the lumen and to some extent the 2 Harvey welcomed
rigidity o the arteries, thus controlling the overall fow through them. questions and criticisms
o his theories when
Both the elastic and muscular tissues contribute to the toughness o the teaching anatomy
walls, which have to be strong to withstand the constantly changing and classes. Suggest why he
intermittently high blood pressure without bulging outwards (aneurysm) might have done this.
or bursting. The bloods progress along major arteries is thus pulsatile, not
continuous. The pulse refects each heartbeat and can easily be elt in arteries 3 Can you think oexamples
that pass near the body surace, including those in the wrist and the neck. othe phantoms and
appearances that Harvey
Each organ o the body is supplied with blood by one or more arteries. reers to?
For example, each kidney is supplied by a renal artery and the liver by
the hepatic artery. The powerul, continuously active muscles o the 4 Why does Harvey
heart itsel are supplied with blood by coronary arteries. recommend reiteration
o experiments?
Artery walls
5 Harvey practised as
Arteries have muscle and elastic fbres in their walls. a doctor, but ater the
publication in 1628 o
The wall o the artery is composed o several layers: his work on the
circulation o the blood,
 tunica externa  a tough outer layer o connective tissue ar ewer patients
consulted him. Why
 tunica media  a thick layer containing smooth muscle and elastic might this have been?
bres made o the protein elastin

 tunica intima  a smooth endothelium orming the lining o the artery.

291

16 H u mC EaLnLpBHIyOsLiOoGlYo g y

tunica externa tunica media

lumen tunica
intima (endothelium)

 Figure 3 Structure of an artery

activity  Figure 2 The cardiovascular system. The main artery that supplies oxygenated blood to
the tissues of the body is the aorta, shown as the red vessel that emerges from the heart
mesuring blood pressures and forms an arch with branches carrying blood to the arms and head. The aorta continues
Because arteries are through the thorax and abdomen, with branches serving the liver, kidneys, intestines and
distensible, blood pressure other organs
in those that pass near
the body surace can be Arterial blood pressure
measured relatively easily.
A common method is to The muscle and elastic bres assist in maintaining
infate an arm cu until it blood pressure between pump cycles.
squeezes the tissues (skin,
supercial at as well as The blood entering an artery rom the heart is at high pressure. The peak
the vessels themselves) pressure reached in an artery is called the systolic pressure. It pushes the
enough to stop blood wall o the artery outwards, widening the lumen and stretching elastic
fow. The pressure is then bres in the wall, thus storing potential energy.
released slowly until fow
resumes and the operator At the end o each heartbeat the pressure in the arteries alls suciently
or instrument can hear the or the stretched elastic bres to squeeze the blood in the lumen. This
pulse again. The pressures at mechanism saves energy and prevents the minimum pressure inside
which blood fow stops and the artery, called the diastolic pressure, rom becoming too low. B ecause
resumes are the systolic and it is relatively high, blood fow in the arteries is relatively steady and
diastolic pressures. They are continuous although driven by a pulsating heart.
measured with a pressure
monitor. According to the The circular muscles in the wall o the artery orm a ring so when they
American Heart Association contract, in a process called vasoconstriction, the circumerence is reduced
the desired blood pressures and the lumen is narrowed. Vasoconstriction increases blood pressure
or adults o 18 years or older in the arteries. Branches o arteries called arterioles have a particularly
measured in this way are: high density o muscle cells that respond to various hormone and neural
signals to control blood fow to downstream tissues. Vasoconstriction o
systolic 90-119 mmHg arterioles restricts blood fow to the part o the body that they supply and
diastolic 60-79 mmHg the opposite process, called vasodilation, increases it.

 Figure 4 Blood pressure monitor

292


Click to View FlipBook Version