The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

Biology - Course Companion - Andrew Allott and David Mindorff - Oxford 2014

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by INTERTU℠ EDUCATION, 2022-08-18 05:58:06

IB Biology - Course Companion - Oxford 2014

Biology - Course Companion - Andrew Allott and David Mindorff - Oxford 2014

Keywords: IB Biology

3 .5 GENETiC mODiFiCATiON AND BiOTEChNOlOGy

benefts or all GM crops. Instead it is better to select  Figure 10 Wild plants growing next to a crop of GM maize
one claim rom the list given here and assess it or
one crop. Much o the evidence relating to potential These diseases currently reduce crop yields
benefts and also to risks is reely available. signifcantly and the only current method
o control is to reduce transmission by
Claims about environmental benefts o killing insect vectors o the viruses with
GM crops: insecticides.

 Pest-resistant crop varieties can be produced A wide variety o concerns about GM crops
by transerring a gene or making a toxin have been raised. Some o these, such as the
to the plants. Less insecticide then has to be eect on armers incomes, cannot be assessed
sprayed on to the crop so ewer bees and on scientifc grounds so are not relevant
other benefcial insects are harmed. here. The remaining concerns can be grouped
into health risks, environmental risks and
 Use o GM crop varieties reduces the need agricultural risks. To make overall j udgments
or plowing and spraying crops, so less uel is about the saety o GM crops, each risk needs
needed or arm machinery. to be assessed careully, using all the available
experimental evidence. This needs to be done
 The shel-lie o ruit and vegetables can be on a case by case basis as it is not possible to
improved, reducing wastage and reducing the assess the risks and benefts o one GM crop
area o crops that have to be grown. rom experiments perormed on another one.

Claims about the health benefts o There is no consensus among all scientists or
GM crops: non-scientists yet about GM crops and it is
thereore important or as many o us as possible
 The nutritional value o crops can be to look at the evidence or the claims and
improved, or example by increasing the counter- claims, rather than the publicity. Any o
vitamin content. the risks that are included here could be selected
or detailed scrutiny.
 Varieties o crops could be produced lacking
allergens or toxins that are naturally present Claims made about health risks o GM crops:
in them.
 Proteins produced by transcription and
 GM crops could be engineered that produce translation o transerred genes could be
edible vaccines so by eating the crop a person
would be vaccinated against a disease.

Claims about agricultural benefts o
GM crops:

 Varieties resistant to drought, cold and salinity
can be produced by gene transer, expending
the range over which crops can be produced
and increasing total yields.

 A gene or herbicide resistance can be
transerred to crop plants allowing all other
plants to be killed in the growing crop by
spraying with herbicide. With less weed
competition crop yields are higher. Herbicides
that kill all plants can be used to create
weed-ree conditions or sowing non-GM
crops but they cannot be used once the crop
is growing.

 Crop varieties can be produced that are
resistant to diseases caused by viruses.

193

3 Genetics

toxic or cause allergic reactions in humans or plants, plant-eating insects and organisms that
livestock that eat GM crops. eed on them where GM rather than non-GM
crops are being grown.
 Antibiotic resistance genes used as markers
during gene transer could spread to Claims made about agricultural risks of
pathogenic bacteria. GM crops:

 Transerred genes could mutate and cause  Some seed rom a crop is always spilt and
unexpected problems that were not risk- germinates to become unwanted volunteer
assessed during development o GM crops. plants that must be controlled, but this could
become very dicult i the crop contains
Claims made about environmental risks of herbicide resistance genes.
GM crops:
 Widespread use o GM crops containing a
 Non-target organisms could be aected by toxin that kills insect pests will lead to the
toxins that are intended to control pests in spread o resistance to the toxin in the pests
GM crop plants. that were the initial problem and also to the
spread o secondary pests that are resistant to
 Genes transerred to crop plants to make the toxin but were previously scarce.
them herbicide resistant could spread to wild
plants, turning them into uncontrollable  Farmers are not permitted by patent law to
s u p e r- w e e ds . save and re-sow GM seed rom crops they
have grown, so strains adapted to local
 Biodiversity could be reduced i a lower conditions cannot be developed.
proportion o sunlight energy passes to weed

Analysing risks to monarch butterfies o
Bt corn

Analysis odata on risks to monarch butterfies oBt crops.

Insect pests o crops can be controlled by spraying with insecticides
but varieties have been recently been produced by genetic engineering
that produce a toxin that kills insects. A gene was transerred rom the
bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis that codes or Bt toxin. The toxin is a
protein. It kills members o insect orders that contain butterfies, moths,
fies, beetles, bees and ants. The genetically engineered corn varieties
produce Bt toxin in all parts o the plant including pollen.

Bt varieties o many crops have been produced, including Zea mays.
In North America this crop is called corn, while in Britain it is known
as maize, or corn on the cob. The crop is attacked by various insect
pests including corn borers, which are the larvae o the moth Ostrinia
nubilalis. C oncerns have been expressed about the eects o Bt corn on
non-target species o insect. One particular species o concern is the
monarch butterfy, Danaus plexippus.

The larvae o the monarch butterfy eed on leaves o milkweed,
Asclepias curassavica. This plant sometimes grows close enough to
corn crops to become dusted with the wind-dispersed corn pollen.
There is thereore a risk that monarch larvae might be poisoned by Bt
toxin in pollen rom GM corn crops. This risk has been investigated
experimentally. D ata rom these experiments is available or analysis.

194

3 .5 GENETiC mODiFiCATiON AND BiOTEChNOlOGy

Data-based questons: Transgenic pollen and monarch larvae Survival of monarch larvae (%) 100

To investigate the eect o pollen rom Bt corn on the larvae o 75
monarch butterfies the ollowing procedure was used. Leaves were
collected rom milkweed plants and were lightly misted with water. A 50
spatula o pollen was gently tapped over the leaves to deposit a ne
dusting. The leaves were placed in water-lled tubes. Five three-day- 25
old monarch butterfy larvae were placed on each lea. The area o lea
eaten by the larvae was monitored over our days. The mass o the 0 23 4
larvae was measured ater our days. The survival o the larvae was 1 Time (days)
monitored over our days.
2

Three treatments were included in the experiment, with ve repeats Cumulative leaf 1.5
o each treatment: consumption per larva

 leaves not dusted with pollen (blue) 1

 leaves dusted with non-GM pollen (yellow) 0.5

 leaves dusted with pollen rom Bt corn (red) 0
12 3
The results are shown in the table, bar chart and graph on the right. 4
Time (days)

1 a) List the variables that were kept constant in the [3] Source: Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME (May 1999) .
experiment. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.
Nature 399 (6733) : 214.
b) Explain the need to keep these variables constant. [2]

2 a) Calculate the total number o larvae used in the Treatment Mean mass of
experiment. surviving larvae (g)
[2]

b) Explain the need or replicates in experiments. [2] Leaves not dusted 0.38
with pollen
3 The bar chart and the graph show mean results and error bars.

Explain how error bars help in the analysis and evaluation Leaves dusted with Not available
non-GM pollen
o data. [2]

4 Explain the conclusions that can be drawn rom the [2] Leaves dusted with 0.16
percentage survival o larvae in the three treatments. pollen from Bt corn

5 Suggest reasons or the dierences in lea consumption [3] Actvt
between the three treatments.
Estatng te sze ofa cone
6 Predict the mean mass o larvae that ed on leaves dusted [2]
with non-GM pollen. A total of 130,000 hectares of Russet
Burbank potatoes were planted in
7 Outline any dierences between the procedures used in [2] Idaho in 2011. The mean density
this experiment and processes that occur in nature, which of planting of potato tubers was
might aect whether monarch larvae are actually harmed 50,000 per hectare. Estimate the size
by Bt pollen. of the clone at the time of planting and
at the time of harvest.

Clones

Clones are groups of genetically identical organisms,
derived from a single original parent cell.

A zygote, produced by the usion o a male and emale gamete, is
the rst cell o a new organism. Because zygotes are produced by
sexual reproduction, they are all genetically dierent. A zygote grows
and develops into an adult organism. I it reproduces sexually, its

195

3 Genetics

Activity ospring will be genetically dierent. In some species organisms can
also reproduce asexually. When they do this, they produce genetically
How many potato clones are there in identical organisms.
this photo?
The production o genetically identical organisms is called cloning and
a group o genetically identical organisms is called a clone.

Although we do not usually think o them in this way, a pair o
identical twins is the smallest clone that can exist. They are either
the result o a human zygote dividing into two cells, which each
develop into separate embryos, or an embryo splitting into two
parts which each develop into a separate individual. Identical twins
are not identical in all their characteristics and have, or example,
dierent fngerprints. A better term or them is monozygotic. More
rarely identical triplets, quadruplets and even quintuplets have
been produced.

Sometimes a clone can consist o very large numbers o organisms.
For example, commercially grown potato varieties are huge clones.
Large clones are ormed by cloning happening again and again,
but even so all the organisms may be traced back to one original
parent cell.

 Figure 11 Identical twins are an example natural methods of cloig
of cloning
Many plant species and some animal species have
 Figure 12 One bulb of garlic clones itself to natural methods of cloning.
produce a group of bulbs by the end of the
growing season Although the word clone is now used or any group o genetically
identical organisms, it was frst used in the early 20th century or plants
produced by asexual reproduction. It comes rom the Greek word or
twig. Many plants have a natural method o cloning. The methods used
by plants are very varied and can involve stems, roots, leaves or bulbs.
Two examples are given here:

 A single garlic bulb, when planted, uses its ood stores to grow
leaves. These leaves produce enough ood by photosynthesis to grow
a group o bulbs. All the bulbs in the group are genetically identical
so they are a clone.

 A strawberry plant grows long horizontal stems with plantlets
at the end. These plantlets grow roots into the soil and
photosynthesize using their leaves, so can become independent
o the parent plant. A healthy strawberry plant can produce ten
or more genetically identical new plants in this way during a
growing season.

Natural methods o cloning are less common in animals but some species
are able to do it.

 Hydra clones itsel by a process called budding ( sub- topic 1 .6,
fgure 1 , page 51 ).

Female aphids can give birth to ospring that have been produced
entirely rom diploid egg cells that were produced by mitosis rather than
meiosis. The ospring are thereore clones o their mother.

196

3 .5 GENETiC mODiFiCATiON AND BiOTEChNOlOGy

Investigating actors afecting the rooting o stem-cuttings

Design o an experiment to assess one actor afecting the rooting o
stem-cuttings.

Stem-cuttings are short lengths o stem that are  whether the cutting is placed in water or
used to clone plants artifcially. I roots develop compost
rom the stem, the cutting can become an
independent new plant.  what type o compost is used

1 Many plants can be cloned rom cuttings.  how warm the cuttings are kept
Ocimum basilicum roots particularly easily.
 whether a plastic bag is placed over the
2 Nodes are positions on the stem where leaves cuttings
are attached. With most species the stem is cut
below a node.  whether holes are cut in the plastic bag.

3 Leaves are removed rom the lower hal o You should think about these questions when
the stem. I there are many large leaves in the you design your experiment:
upper hal they can also be reduced.
1 What is your independent variable?
4 The lowest third o the cutting is inserted into
compost or water. C ompost should be sterile 2 How will you measure the amount
and contain plenty o both air and water. o root ormation, which is your dependent
variable?
5 A clear plastic bag with a ew holes cut in it
prevents excessive water loss rom cuttings 3 Which variables should you keep
inserted in compost. constant?

6 Rooting normally takes a ew weeks. Growth 4 How many dierent types o plant should
o new leaves usually indicates that the cutting you use?
has developed roots.
5 How many cuttings should you use or each
treatment?

Not all gardeners have success when trying
to clone plants using root cuttings. Successul
gardeners are sometimes said to have green
fngers but a biologist would reject this as
the reason or their success. Experiments can
give evidence about the actors that determine
whether cuttings root or not. You can design and
carry out an experiment to investigate one o
the actors on the list below, or another actor o
your own.

Possible actors to investigate:

 whether the stem is cut above or below a node

 how long the cutting is

 whether the end o the stem is let in the air to
callus over

 how many leaves are let on the cutting

 whether a hormone rooting powder is used

197

3 Genetics

 Figure 13 Sea urchin embryo ( a) 4-cell stage Cloning animal embryos
(b) blastula stage consisting of a hollow ball
of cells Animals can be cloned at the embryo stage by breaking
up the embryo into more than one group o cells.
 Figure 14 Xenopus tadpoles
At an early stage o development all cells in an animal embryo are
198 pluripotent (capable o developing into all types o tissue) . It is thereore
theoretically possible or the embryo to divide into two or more parts
and each part to develop into a separate individual with all body parts.
This process is called splitting or ragmentation. Coral embryos have
been observed to clone themselves by breaking up into smaller groups o
cells or even single cells, presumably because this increases the chance o
one embryo surviving.

Formation o identical twins could be regarded as cloning by splitting,
but most animal species do not appear to do this naturally. However, it
is possible to break up animal embryos artifcially and in some cases the
separated parts develop into multiple embryos.

In livestock, an egg can be ertilized in vitro and allowed to develop into a
multicellular embryo. Individual cells can be separated rom the embryo
while they are still pluripotent and transplanted into surrogate mothers.
Only a limited number o clones can be obtained this way, because ater
a certain number o divisions the embryo cells are no longer pluripotent.
Splitting o embryos is usually most successul at the eight-cell stage.

There has been little interest in this method o artifcial cloning because
at the embryo stage it is not possible to assess whether a new individual
produced by sexual reproduction has desirable characteristics.

Cloning adult animals using diferentiated cells

Methods have been developed or cloning adult animals
using diferentiated cells.

It is relatively easy to clone animal embryos, but at that stage it
is impossible to know whether the embryos will have desirable
characteristics. Once the embryos have grown into adults it is easy to
assess their characteristics, but it is much more difcult to clone them.
This is because the cells that make up the body o an adult animal
are dierentiated. To produce all the tissues in a new animal body
undierentiated pluripotent cells are needed.

The biologist John Gurdon carried out experiments on cloning in the rog
Xenopus as a postgraduate student in Oxord during the 1 950s. He removed
nuclei rom body cells o Xenopus tadpoles and transplanted them into egg
cells rom which the nucleus had been removed. The egg cells into which
the nuclei were transplanted developed as though they were zygotes. They
carried out cell division, cell growth and dierentiation to orm all the
tissues o a normal Xenopus rog. In 201 2 Gurdon was awarded the Nobel
Prize or Physiology or Medicine or his pioneering research.

Cloning using dierentiated cells proved to be much more diicult
in mammals. The irst cloned mammal was Dolly the sheep in 1 996.
Apart rom the obvious reproductive uses o this type o cloning,
there is also interest in it or therapeutic reasons. I this procedure

3 .5 GENETiC mODiFiCATiON AND BiOTEChNOlOGy

was done with humans, the embryo would consist of pluripotent
stem cells, which could be used to regenerate tissues for the adult.
Because the cells would be genetically identical to those of the
adult from whom the nucleus was obtained they would not cause
rejection problems.

Methods used to produce Dolly

Production of cloned embryos by somatic-cell nuclear transfer.

The production of Dolly was a pioneering
development in animal cloning. The method that
was used is called somatic-cell nuclear transfer. A
somatic cell is a normal body cell with a diploid
nucleus. The method has these stages:

 Adult cells were taken from the udder of
a Finn Dorset ewe and were grown in the
laboratory, using a medium containing a low
concentration of nutrients. This made genes
in the cells inactive so that the pattern of
differentiation was lost.

 Unfertilized eggs were taken from the ovaries

of a Scottish Blackface ewe. The nuclei were  Figure 15 Dolly with Dr Ian Wilmut, the embryologist who led
removed from these eggs. One of the cultured the team that produced her
cells from the Finn Dorset was placed next

to each egg cell, inside the zona pellucida  The embryos were then injected when about

around the egg, which is a protective coating seven days old into the uteri of other ewes that

of gel. A small electric pulse was used to could act as surrogate mothers. This was done

cause the two cells to fuse together. About in the same way as in IVF. O nly one of the 2 9
1 0% of the fused cells developed like a zygote embryos implanted successfully and developed

into an embryo. through a normal gestation. This was D olly.

egg without a
nucleus fused
with donor cell
using a pulse of

electricity

cell taken from udder of embryo resulting from
donor adult and cultured
in laboratory for six days fusion of udder cell and

egg transfered to the surrogate mother
uterus of a third sheep gives birth to lamb.
which acts as the Dolly is genetically
surrogate mother identical with the

sheep that donated

the udder cell

unfertilized egg taken from another (the donor)
sheep. Nucleus removed from the egg

 Figure 16 A method or cloning an adult sheep using diferentiated cells

199

3 Genetics

Questions

1 Human somatic cells have 46 chromosomes, 3 The cheetah ( Acinonyx jubatus) is an endangered

while our closest primate relatives, the species o large cat ound in South and East

chimpanzee, the gorilla and the orangutan all Arica. A study o the level o variation o the

have 48 chromosomes. One hypothesis is that cheetah gene pool was carried out. In one

the human chromosome number 2 was ormed part o this study, blood samples were taken

rom the usion o two chromosomes in a rom 1 9 cheetahs and analysed or the protein

primate ancestor. The image below shows transerrin using gel electrophoresis. The

human chromosome 2 compared to chromosome results were compared with the electrophoresis

1 2 and 1 3 rom the chimpanzee. patterns or blood samples rom 1 9 domestic

a) Compare the human chromosome 2 cats ( Felis sylvestris) . Gel electrophoresis can
be used to separate proteins using the same
with the two chimpanzee chromosomes principles as in DNA profling. The bands on
the gel which represent orms o the protein
(fgure 1 7). [3] transerrin are indicated.

b) The ends o chromosomes, called telomeres,
have many repeats o the same short DNA

sequence. I the usion hypothesis were

true, predict what would be ound in the

region o the chromosome where the usion

is hypothesized to have occurred. [2] transferrin

HC

 Figure 17

origin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
cheetahs
2 The pedigree in fgure 1 8 shows the ABO
groups o three generations o a amily.

I AB B OB transferrin
1 2 34

II B A B OO
1 2 3 45

III O A B O?
1 2 3 45

 Figure 18 origin

a) Deduce the genotype o each person in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
domestic cats

amily. [4]  Figure 19

b) Deduce the possible blood groups o

individual III 5, with the percentage chance Using fgure 1 9, deduce with reasons:

o each. [2] a) the number o domestic cats and the

c) Deduce the possible blood groups and the number o cheetahs that were heterozygous
percentage chance o each blood group:
or the transerrin gene; [2]

(i) o children o individual III 1 and his b) the number o alleles o the transerrin gene
partner who is also in blood group O [2]
in the gene pool o domestic cats; [2]

(ii) o children o III 2 and her partner who c) the number o alleles o the transerrin gene

is in blood group AB. [2] in the gene pool o cheetahs. [1 ]

200

4 Ecology survival o living organisms including humans
depends on sustainable ecological communities.
Intrdutin Concentrations o gases in the atmosphere have
signifcant eects on climates experienced at the
Ecosystems require a continuous supply o Earths surace.
energy to uel lie processes and to replace
energy lost as heat. Continued availability
o carbon and other chemical elements in
ecosystems depends on cycles. The uture

4.1 Species, communities and ecosystems

Understandin Skis

 Species are groups o organisms that can  Classiying species as autotrophs, consumers,
potentially interbreed to produce ertile ofspring. detritivores or saprotrophs rom a knowledge o
their mode o nutrition.
 Members o a species may be reproductively
isolated in separate populations.  Testing or association between two species
using the chi-squared test with data obtained
 Species have either an autotrophic or by quadrat sampling.
heterotrophic method o nutrition (a ew
species have both methods) .  Recognizing and interpreting statistical
signicance.
 Consumers are heterotrophs that eed on living
organisms by ingestion.  Setting up sealed mesocosms to try to
establish sustainability. (Practical 5)
 Detritivores are heterotrophs that obtain organic
nutrients rom detritus by internal digestion. Nature f siene

 Saprotrophs are heterotrophs that obtain  Looking or patterns, trends and discrepancies:
organic nutrients rom dead organic matter by plants and algae are mostly autotrophic but
external digestion. some are not.

 A community is ormed by populations
o diferent species living together and
interacting with each other.

 A community orms an ecosystem by its
interactions with the abiotic environment.

 Autotrophs and heterotrophs obtain inorganic
nutrients rom the abiotic environment.

 The supply o inorganic nutrients is maintained
by nutrient cycling.

 Ecosystems have the potential to be
sustainable over long periods o time.

201

14 E co lo g y

 Figure 1 A bird of paradise in Papua Species
New Guinea
Species are groups o organisms that can potentially
interbreed to produce ertile ofspring.

Birds o paradise inhabit Papua New Guinea and other Australasian
islands. In the breeding season the males do elaborate and distinctive
courtship dances, repeatedly carrying out a series o movements
to display their exotic plumage. One reason or this is to show to a
emale that they are ft and would be a suitable partner. Another
reason is to show that they are the same type o bird o paradise as
the emale.

There are orty-one dierent types o bird o paradise. Each o
these usually only reproduces with others o its type and hybrids
between the dierent types are rarely produced. For this reason
each o the orty-one types o bird o paradise remains distinct, with
characters that are dierent to those o other types. Biologists call
types o organism such as these species. Although ew species have
as elaborate courtship rituals as birds o paradise, most species have
some method o trying to ensure that they reproduce with other
members o their species.

When two members o the same species mate and produce ospring
they are interbreeding. Occasionally members o dierent species breed
together. This is called cross- breeding. It happens occasionally with birds
o paradise. However, the ospring produced by cross- breeding between
species are almost always inertile, which prevents the genes o two
species becoming mixed.

The reproductive separation between species is the reason or each
species being a recognizable type o organism with characters that
distinguish it rom even the most closely related other species. In
summary, a species is a group o organisms that interbreed to produce
ertile ospring.

Populations

Members o a species may be reproductively isolated in
separate populations.

A population is a group o organisms o the same species who live in the
same area at the same time. I two populations live in dierent areas
they are unlikely to interbreed with each other. This does not mean that
they are dierent species. I they potentially could interbreed, they are
still members o the same species.

I two populations o a species never interbreed then they may gradually
develop dierences in their characters. Even i there are recognizable
dierences, they are considered to be the same species until they cannot
interbreed and produce ertile ospring. In practice it can be very
difcult to decide whether two populations have reached this point and
biologists sometimes disagree about whether populations are the same or
dierent species.

202

4.1 SPecieS, com muni tieS an d ecoSyStem S

arph  hrrph r av

Species have either an autotrophic or heterotrophic Glpgs rss
method o nutrition (a ew species have both methods) . The tortoises that live on
the Galpagos islands are
All organisms need a supply o organic nutrients, such as glucose and the largest in the world.
amino acids. They are needed or growth and reproduction. Methods o They have sometimes been
obtaining these carbon compounds can be divided into two types: grouped together into one
species, Chelinoidis nigra,
 some organisms make their own carbon compounds rom carbon but more recently have been
dioxide and other simple substances  they are autotrophic, which split into separate species.
means sel-eeding; Discuss whether each
o these observations
 some organisms obtain their carbon compounds rom other indicates that populations
organisms  they are heterotrophic, which means eeding on others. on the various islands are
separate species:
S ome unicellular organisms use both methods o nutrition. Euglena  The Galpagos tortoises
gracilis or example has chloroplasts and carries out photosynthesis when
there is sufcient light, but can also eed on detritus or smaller organisms are poor swimmers and
by endocytosis. Organisms that are not exclusively autotrophic or cannot travel rom one
heterotrophic are mixotrophic. island to another so
they do not naturally
 Figure 3 Arabidopsis  Figure 4 Humming birds  Figure 5 Euglena  an interbreed.
thaliana the autotroph  Tortoises rom
that molecular biologists are heterotrophic; the plants unusual organism diferent islands have
use as a model plant recognizable diferences
from which they obtain as it can feed both in their characters,
including shell size and
nectar are autotrophic autotrophically and shape.
 Tortoises rom diferent
heterotrophically islands have been
mated in zoos and
trs  pl  lgl r hybrid ofspring have
been produced but they
Looking or patterns, trends and discrepancies: plants have lower ertility and
and algae are mostly autotrophic but some are not. higher mortality than
the ofspring o tortoises
Almost all plants and algae are autotrophic  they make their own rom the same island.
complex organic compounds using carbon dioxide and other simple
substances. A supply o energy is needed to do this, which plants and  Figure 2 Galpagos tortoise
algae obtain by absorbing light. Their method o autotrophic nutrition
is thereore photosynthesis and they carry it out in chloroplasts.

This trend or plants and algae to make their own carbon compounds
by photosynthesis in chloroplasts is ollowed by the majority o species.
However there are small numbers o both plants and algae that do not ft
the trend, because although they are recognizably plants or algae, they

203

14 E co lo g y

do not contain chloroplasts and they do not carry out photosynthesis.
These species grow on other plants, obtain carbon compounds rom
them and cause them harm. They are thereore parasitic.

To decide whether parasitic plants alsiy the theory that plants and
algae are groups o autotrophic species or whether they are just minor
and insignifcant discrepancies we need to consider how many species
there are and how they evolved.

 The number o parasitic plants and algae is relatively small  only
about 1 % o all plant and algal species.

 It is almost certain that the original ancestral species o plant and
alga were autotrophic and that the parasitic species evolved rom
them. Chloroplasts can quite easily be lost rom cells, but cannot
easily be developed. Also, parasitic species are diverse and occur in
many dierent amilies. This pattern suggests that parasitic plants
have evolved repeatedly rom photosynthetic species.

Because o this evidence, ecologists regard plants and algae as groups o
autotrophs, with a small number o exceptional species that are parasitic.

data-base questions: Unexpected diets

Although we usually expect plants to be autotrophs and
animals to be consumers, living organisms are very varied
and do not always conorm to our expectations. Figures 6
to 9 show our organisms with diets that are unexpected.

1 Which o the organisms is autotrophic? [4]

2 Which o the organisms is heterotrophic? [4]

3 O the organisms that are heterotrophic, deduce which is a  Figure 6 Venus y trap: grows in
consumer, which a detritivore and which a saprotroph. [4] swamps, with green leaves that
carry out photosynthesis and also
catch and digest insects, to provide
a supply o nitrogen

 Figure 7 Ghost orchid: grows  Figure 8 Euglena: unicell  Figure 9 Dodder: grows parasitically
underground in woodland, eeding that lives in ponds, using its on gorse bushes, using small root-like
of dead organic matter, occasionally chloroplasts or photosynthesis, structures to obtain sugars, amino acids
growing a stem with owers above but also ingesting dead organic and other substances it requires, rom
ground matter by endocytosis the gorse

204

4.1 SPecieS, com muni tieS an d ecoSyStem S

csrs  Figure 10 Red kite (Milvus milvus) is a
consumer that feeds on live prey but also
Consumers are heterotrophs that feed on living organisms on dead animal remains (carrion)
by ingestion.
 Figure 11 Yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus
Heterotrophs are divided into groups by ecologists according to the favicollis) is a consumer that feeds mostly on
source o organic molecules that they use and the method o taking living plant matter, especially seeds, but also
them in. One group o heterotrophs is called consumers. on living invertebrates

Consumers eed o other organisms. These other organisms are either
still alive or have only been dead or a relatively short time. A mosquito
sucking blood rom a larger animal is a consumer that eeds on an
organism that is still alive. A lion eeding o a gazelle that it has killed is
a consumer.

Consumers ingest their ood. This means that they take in undigested
material rom other organisms. They digest it and absorb the products o
digestion. Unicellular consumers such as Paramecium take the ood in by
endocytosis and digest it inside vacuoles. Multicellular consumers such
as lions take ood into their digestive system by swallowing it.

Consumers are sometimes divided up into trophic groups according
to what other organisms they consume. Primary consumers eed on
autotrophs; secondary consumers eed on primary consumers and so on.
In practice, most consumers do not ft neatly into any one o these groups
because their diet includes material rom a variety o trophic groups.

drvrs Sprrphs

Detritivores are heterotrophs that obtain Saprotrophs are heterotrophs that obtain
organic nutrients from detritus by organic nutrients from dead
internal digestion. organic matter by external digestion.

Organisms discard large quantities o organic Saprotrophs secrete digestive enzymes into the dead
matter, or example: organic matter and digest it externally. They then
absorb the products o digestion. Many types o
 dead leaves and other parts o plants bacteria and ungi are saprotrophic. They are also
known as decomposers because they break down
 eathers, hairs and other dead parts o animal carbon compounds in dead organic matter and
bodies release elements such as nitrogen into the ecosystem
so that they can be used again by other organisms.
 eces rom animals.
 Figure 12 Saprotrophic fungi growing over the surfaces of dead
This dead organic matter rarely accumulates leaves and decomposing them by secreting digestive enzymes
in ecosystems and instead is used as a source
o nutrition by two groups o heterotroph 
detritivores and saprotrophs.

Detritivores ingest dead organic matter and then
digest it internally and absorb the products o
digestion. Large multicellular detritivores such as
earthworms ingest the dead matter into their gut.
Unicellular organisms ingest it into ood vacuoles.
The larvae o dung beetles eed by ingestion o
eces rolled into a ball by their parent.

205

14 E co lo g y Identifying modes of nutrition

TOK Classiying species as autotrophs, consumers, detritivores
or saprotrophs rom a knowledge otheir mode onutrition.
to wh exen do he lssifion
sysems (lbels nd egories) we By answering a series o simple questions about an organisms mode o
use se limis o wh we pereive? nutrition it is usually possible to deduce what trophic group it is in. These
questions are presented here as a dichotomous key, which consists o a
There are innite ways to divide up series o pairs o choices. The key works or unicellular and multicellular
our observations. Organisms can be organisms but does not work or parasites such as tapeworms or
organized in a number o ways by ungi that cause diseases in plants. All multicellular autotrophs are
scientists: by morphology (physical photosynthetic and have chloroplasts containing chlorophyll.
similarity to other organisms) ,
phylogeny (evolutionary history) and Feeds on living or recently Feeds on dead organic
niche (ecological role) . In everyday killed organisms = CONSUMERS matter = DETRITIVORES
language, we classiy organisms such
as domesticated or wild; dangerous or
harmless; edible or toxic.

Either ingests organic matter by endocytosis (no cell walls) or by taking it into its gut.

aiviy START HERE

cleruing

Cell walls present. No ingestion of organic matter. No gut. Enzymes not secreted.
Only requires simple
Secretes enzymes into ions and compounds
its environment to digest such as CO2
dead organic matter = AUTOTROPHS
= SAPROTROPHS

 Figure 14 communiies

In a classic essay written in 1972, the A community is ormed by populations o diferent
physicist Philip Anderson stated this: species living together and interacting with each other.

The ability to reduce everything to An important part o ecology is research into relationships between
simple fundamental laws does not organisms. These relationships are complex and varied. In some cases
imply the ability to start from those the interaction between two species is o benet to one species and
laws and reconstruct the universe. At harms the other, or example the relationship between a parasite and its
each level ofcomplexity entirely new host. In other cases both species benet, as when a hummingbird eeds
properties appear. on nectar rom a fower and helps the plant by pollinating it.

Clearcutting is the most common All species are dependent on relationships with other species or their
and economically protable orm o long-term survival. For this reason a population o one species can
logging. It involves clearing every tree never live in isolation. Groups o populations live together. A group
in an area so that no canopy remains.
With reerence to the concept o
emergent properties, suggest why the
ecological community oten ails to
recover ater clearcutting.

206

4.1 SPecieS, com muni tieS an d ecoSyStem S

o populations living together in an area and interacting with each other
is known in ecology as a community. Typical communities consist o
hundreds or even thousands o species living together in an area.

 Figure 13 A coral reef is a complex community with many interactions between the
populations. Most corals have photosynthetic unicellular algae called zooxanthellae living
inside their cells

Field work  associations between species

Testing for association between two species using the chi-squared test with data
obtained by quadrat sampling.

Quadrats are square sample areas, usually marked  The quadrat is placed precisely at the distances
out using a quadrat rame. Quadrat sampling determined by the two random numbers.
involves repeatedly placing a quadrat rame at
random positions in a habitat and recording the I this procedure is ollowed correctly, with a large
numbers o organisms present each time. enough number o replicates, reliable estimates o

The usual procedure or randomly positioning
quadrats is this:

 A base line is marked out along the edge o the
habitat using a measuring tape. It must extend
all the way along the edge o the habitat.

 Random numbers are obtained using either
a table or a random number generator on a
c a lc u la to r.

 A frst random number is used to determine
a distance along the measuring tape. All
distances along the tape must be equally likely.

 A second random number is used to determine

a distance out across the habitat at right angles

to the tape. All distances across the habitat  Figure 15 Quadrat sampling of seaweed populations on a

must be equally likely. rocky shore

207

14 E co lo g y

population sizes are obtained. The method is only 2 C alculate the expected requencies,

suitable or plants and other organisms that are assuming independent distribution, or

not motile. Quadrat sampling is not suitable or each o the our species combinations.

populations o most animals, or obvious reasons. Each expected requency is calculated rom

I the presence or absence o more than one values on the contingency table using this
species is recorded in every quadrat during equation:
sampling o a habitat, it is possible to test or an
association between species. Populations are oten expected =  _row tota_l  colum_n total
grand total
requency

unevenly distributed because some parts o the 3 Calculate the number o degrees o reedom
habitat are more suitable or a species than others. using this equation.
I two species occur in the same parts o a habitat,
they will tend to be ound in the same quadrats. degrees o reedom = (m  1 ) (n  1 )

This is known as a positive association. There can where m and n are the number o rows
also be negative associations, or the distribution o and number o columns in the contingency
two species can be independent. table.

There are two possible hypotheses: 4 Find the critical region or chi-squared rom a

H0: two species are distributed independently table o chi-squared values, using the degrees
(the null hypothesis) . o reedom that you have calculated and a

H1: two species are associated (either positively signifcance level (p) o 0.05 (5%) . The critical
so they tend to occur together or negatively so region is any value o chi-squared larger than
the value in the table.
they tend to occur apart) .

We can test these hypotheses using a statistical 5 Calculate chi-squared using this equation:
procedure  the chi-squared test. X2 =  _( fo - fe) 2
fe
The chi-squared test is only valid i all the

expected requencies are 5 or larger and the where fo is the observed requency

sample was taken at random rom the population. fe is the expected requency and

Method for chi-squared test  is the sum o.

1 Draw up a contingency table o observed 6 Compare the calculated value o chi-squared

requencies, which are the numbers o quadrats with the critical region.

containing or not containing the two species.

 I the calculated value is in the critical

Species A Species A Row region, there is evidence at the 5% level

present absent totals or an association between the two species.

Species B present We can rej ect the hypothesis H0.

Species B absent  I the calculated value is not in the critical
Column totals region, because it is equal or below the
value obtained rom the table o chi-

Calculate the row and column totals. Adding squared values, H0 is not rejected. There
the row totals or the column totals should give is no evidence at the 5% level or an
the same grand total in the lower right cell.
association between the two species.

208

4.1 SPecieS, com muni tieS an d ecoSyStem S

d-bs qss: Chi-squared testing

Figure 1 6 shows an area on the summit o C aer 3 Calculate the number o degrees o reedom. [2 ]

Caradoc, a hill in Shropshire, England. 4 Find the critical region or chi-squared at a

The area is grazed by sheep in summer and signifcance level o 5%. [2]

hill walkers cross it on grassy paths. There are 5 Calculate chi-squared. [4]
raised hummocks with heather (Calluna vulgaris)

growing in them. A visual survey o this site 6 State the two alternative hypotheses, H0 and
suggested that Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus, a species
o moss growing in this area, was associated H , and evaluate them using the calculated
1

value or chi-squared. [4]

with these heather hummocks. The presence or 7 Suggest ecological reasons or an association

absence o the heather and the moss was recorded between the heather and the moss. [4]

in a sample o 1 00 quadrats, positioned randomly.

8 Explain the methods that should have been

Results used to position quadrats randomly in the

Sps Frq area o study. [3]

Heather only 9

Moss only 7

Both species 57

Neither species 27

Questions

1 Construct a contingency table o observed

values. [4]

2 Calculate the expected values, assuming no

association between the species. [4]  Figure 16 Caer Caradoc, Shropshire

Statistical signifcance

Recognizing and interpreting statistical signifcance.

Biologists oten use the phrase statistically that it is alse. A statistic is calculated using the
signifcant when discussing results o an results o the research and is compared with
experiment. This reers to the outcome o a range o possible values called the critical
a statistical hypothesis test. There are two region. I the calculated statistic exceeds the
alternative types o hypothesis: critical region, the null hypothesis is considered
to be alse and is thereore rejected, though
 H is the null hypothesis and is the belie that we cannot say that this has been proved
0 with certainty.
there is no relationship, or example that two
means are equal or that there is no association When a biologist states that results were
or correlation between two variables. statistically signifcant it means that i the null
hypothesis (H0) was true, the probability o getting
 H1 is the alternative hypothesis and is the results as extreme as the observed results would
belie that there is a relationship, or example be very small. A decision has to be made about
that two means are dierent or that there is an how small this probability needs to be. This is
association between two variables. known as the signifcance level. It is the cut-o
point or the probability o rejecting the null
The usual procedure is to test the null
hypothesis, with the expectation o showing

209

14 E co lo g y

hypothesis when in act it was true. A level o  In the example o testing or an association
5% is oten chosen, so the probability is less than between two species, described on previous
one in twenty. That is the minimum acceptable pages, the chi-squared test shows whether
signicance level in published research. there is a less than 5% probability o the
dierence between the observed and the
 I there is a dierence between the mean expected results being as large as it is
results or the two treatments in an without the species being either positively or
experiment, a statistical test will show negatively associated.
whether the dierence is signicant at the 5%
level. I it is, there is a less than 5% probability When results o biological research are displayed
o such a large dierence between the sample on a bar chart, letters are oten used to indicate
means arising by chance, even when the statistical signicance. Two dierent letters,
population means are equal. We say that there usually a and b, indicate mean results with a
is statistically signicant evidence that the statistically signicant dierence. Two o the same
population means dier. letter such as a and a indicates that any dierence
is not statistically signicant.

 Figure 17 Grasses in an area of developing Ecosystems
sand dunes
A community forms an ecosystem by its interactions
210 with the abiotic environment.

A community is composed o all organisms living in an area. These
organisms could not live in isolation  they depend on their non-
living surroundings o air, water, soil or rock. Ecologists reer to these
surroundings as the abiotic environment.

In some cases the abiotic environment exerts a powerul infuence over the
organisms. For example the wave action on a rocky shore creates a very
specialized habitat and only organisms adapted to it can survive. On clis,
the rock type determines whether there are ledges on which birds can nest.

There are also many cases where living organisms infuence the abiotic
environment. Sand dunes are an example o this. They develop along
coasts where sand is blown up the shore and specialized plants grow in
the loose wind-blown sand. The roots o these plants stabilize the sand
and their leaves break the wind and encourage more sand to be deposited.

So, not only are there complex interactions within communities, there are
also many interactions between organisms and the abiotic environment.
The community o organisms in an area and their non-living environment
can thereore be considered to be a single highly complex interacting
system, known as an ecosystem. Ecologists study both the components o
ecosystems and the interactions between them.

inorganc nutrents

Autotrophs and heterotrophs obtain inorganic nutrients
from the abiotic environment.

Living organisms need a supply o chemical elements:

 Carbon, hydrogen and oxygen are needed to make carbohydrates,
lipids and other carbon compounds on which lie is based.

4.1 SPecieS, com muni tieS an d ecoSyStem S

 Nitrogen and phosphorus are also needed to make many o these
compounds.

 Approximately fteen other elements are needed by living
organisms. S ome o them are used in minute traces only, but they
are nonetheless essential.

Autotrophs obtain all o the elements that they need as inorganic
nutrients rom the abiotic environment, including carbon and nitrogen.
Heterotrophs on the other hand obtain these two elements and
several others as part o the carbon compounds in their ood. They do
however obtain other elements as inorganic nutrients rom the abiotic
environment, including sodium, potassium and calcium.

nr ls Reserves of an
element in the
The supply of inorganic nutrients is maintained by abiotic environment
nutrient cycling.
Element forming
There are limited supplies on Earth o chemical elements. Although part of a living
living organisms have been using the supplies or three billion years,
they have not run out. This is because chemical elements can be organism
endlessly recycled. Organisms absorb the elements that they require as
inorganic nutrients rom the abiotic environment, use them and then
return them to the environment with the atoms unchanged.

Recycling o chemical elements is rarely as simple as shown in this
diagram and oten an element is passed rom organism to organism
beore it is released back into the abiotic environment. The details
vary rom element to element. The carbon cycle is dierent rom the
nitrogen cycle or example. Ecologists reer to these schemes collectively
as nutrient cycles. The word nutrient is oten ambiguous in biology but
in this context it simply means an element that an organism needs.
The carbon cycle is described as an example o a nutrient cycle in sub-
topic 4.2 and the nitrogen cycle in Option C.

Ssbl f sss  Figure 18 Living organisms have been recycling
for billions of years
Ecosystems have the potential to be sustainable over
long periods of time. 211

The concept o sustainability has risen to prominence recently because
it is clear that some current human uses o resources are unsustainable.
S omething is sustainable i it can continue indefnitely. Human use o
ossil uels is an example o an unsustainable activity. Supplies o ossil
uels are fnite, are not currently being renewed and cannot thereore
carry on indefnitely.

Natural ecosystems can teach us how to live in a sustainable way, so
that our children and grandchildren can live as we do. There are three
requirements or sustainability in ecosystems:

 nutrient availability

 detoxifcation o waste products

 energy availability.

14 E co lo g y

 Figure 19 Sunlight supplies energy to a forest Nutrients can be recycled indefnitely and i this is done there should
ecosystem and nutrients are recycled not be a lack o the chemical elements on which lie is based. The waste
products o one species are usually exploited as a resource by another
ativity species. For example, ammonium ions released by decomposers are
absorbed and used or an energy source by Nitrosomonas bacteria in the
cve eosystems soil. Ammonium is potentially toxic but because o the action o these
Organisms have been ound bacteria it does not accumulate.
living in total darkness in
caves, including eyeless Energy cannot be recycled, so sustainability depends on continued
fsh. Discuss whether energy supply to ecosystems. Most energy is supplied to ecosystems
ecosystems in dark caves as light rom the sun. The importance o this supply can be illustrated
are sustainable. by the consequences o the eruption o Mount Tambora in 1 81 5 .
Figure 20 shows a Dust in the atmosphere reduced the intensity o sunlight or some
small ecosystem with months aterwards, causing crop ailures globally and deaths due to
photosynthesizing plants starvation. This was only a temporary phenomenon, however, and
near artifcial lighting in a energy supplies to ecosystems in the orm o sunlight will continue
cave that is open to visitors or billions o years.
in Cheddar Gorge. Discuss
whether this is more or Mesocosms
less sustainable than
ecosystems in dark caves. Setting up sealed mesocosms to try to establish
sustainability. (Practical 5)
 Figure 20
Mesocosms are small experimental areas that are set up as
ecological experiments. Fenced-o enclosures in grassland or
orest could be used as terrestrial mesocosms; tanks set up in
the laboratory can be used as aquatic mesocosms. Ecological
experiments can be done in replicate mesocosms, to fnd out the
eects o varying one or more conditions. For example, tanks could
be set up with and without fsh, to investigate the eects o fsh on
aquatic ecosystems.

Another possible use o mesocosms is to test what types o ecosystems
are sustainable. This involves sealing up a community o organisms
together with air and soil or water inside a container.

You should consider these questions beore setting up either aquatic
or terrestrial mesocosms:

 Large glass jars are ideal but transparent plastic containers could
also be used. Should the sides o the container be transparent or
opaque?

 Which o these groups o organisms must be included to make up
a sustainable community: autotrophs, consumers, saprotrophs and
detritivores?

 How can we ensure that the oxygen supply is sufcient or all the
organisms in the mesocosm as once it is sealed, no more oxygen
will be able to enter.

 How can we prevent any organisms suering as a result o being
placed in the mesocosm?

212

4.2 enerGy Flow

4.2 eg f

Understanding Skills

 Most ecosystems rely on a supply o energy  Quantitative representations o energy fow
rom sunlight. using pyramids o energy.

 Light energy is converted to chemical energy in Nature of science
carbon compounds by photosynthesis.
 Use theories to explain natural phenomena:
 Chemical energy in carbon compounds fows the concept o energy fow explains the limited
through ood chains by means o eeding. length o ood chains.

 Energy released by respiration is used in living
organisms and converted to heat.

 LoivrNminsag ootrugearnneeirsgomyf.s scacnineotncconevert heat to other

 EHxepaetriismloesnttarlodmeseigcnos: aycscteumraste. quantitative
 amEthrneeeeaelrsegsunysrgeeltonmhstisoeaenl.stosboiendtwochsemaeinnosstriaosnpehdxiptcheleerivmbeioelsmnrtaesssstrioct

higher trophic levels.

Sunlight and ecosystems

Most ecosystems rely on a supply o energy rom
sunlight.

For most biological communities, the initial source of energy is
sunlight. Living organisms can harvest this energy by photosynthesis.
Three groups of autotroph carry out photosynthesis: plants,
eukaryotic algae including seaweeds that grow on rocky shores, and
cyanobacteria. These organisms are often referred to by ecologists
as producers.

Heterotrophs do not use light energy directly, but they are indirectly
dependent on it. There are several groups of heterotroph in ecosystems:
consumers, saprotrophs and detritivores. All of them use carbon
compounds in their food as a source of energy. In most ecosystems all
or almost all energy in the carbon compounds will originally have been
harvested by photosynthesis in producers.

The amount of energy supplied to ecosystems in sunlight varies around
the world. The percentage of this energy that is harvested by producers
and therefore available to other organisms also varies. In the Sahara
Desert, for example, the intensity of sunlight is very high but little of it
becomes available to organisms because there are very few producers.
In the redwood forests of California the intensity of sunlight is less than
in the Sahara but much more energy becomes available to organisms
because producers are abundant.

213

14 E co lo g y

ativity dt-bse questions: Insolation

cynobteri in ves Insolation is a measure o solar radiation The two maps in fgure 2
show annual mean insolation at the top o the Earths atmosphere
Cyanobacteria are (upper map) and at the Earths surace (lower map) .
photosynthetic bacteria that
are oten very abundant Questions
in marine and reshwater
ecosystems. Figure 1 1 State the relationship between distance rom the equator and
shows an area ogreen
cyanobacteria on an area insolation at the top o the Earths atmosphere. [1 ]
owall in a cave that is
illuminated by artifcial light. 2 S tate the mean annual insolation in Watts per square metre
The surrounding areas are or the most northerly part o Australia
normally dark. Ithe artifcial
light was not present, what a) at the top o the atmosphere [1 ]
other energy sources could [1 ]
be used by bacteria in caves? b) at the Earths surace.
[2]
3 Suggest reasons or dierences in insolation at the Earths
surace between places that are at the same distance rom
the equator.

4 Tropical rainorests are ound in equatorial regions o all [5]
continents. They have very high rates o photosynthesis.
Evaluate the hypothesis that this is due to very high
insolation. Include named parts o the world in your
a n s w e r.

 Figure 1

0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 w/m2

 Figure 2

214

4.2 enerGy Flow

Energy conversion activit

Light energy is converted to chemical energy in carbon Bush d st fs
compounds by photosynthesis.
 Figure 3
Producers absorb sunlight using chlorophyll and other photosynthetic Figure 3 shows a bush re in
pigments. This converts the light energy to chemical energy, which is used to Australia.
make carbohydrates, lipids and all the other carbon compounds in producers. What energy conversion is
happening in a bush re?
Producers can release energy rom their carbon compounds by cell Bush and orest res
respiration and then use it or cell activities. Energy released in this way occur naturally in some
is eventually lost to the environment as waste heat. However, only some ecosystems.
o the carbon compounds in producers are used in this way and the Suggest two reasons or this
largest part remains in the cells and tissues o producers. The energy in hypothesis: There are ewer
these carbon compounds is available to heterotrophs. heterotrophs in ecosystems
where res are common
Energy in food chains compared to ecosystems
where res are not common.
Chemical energy in carbon compounds fows through ood
chains by means o eeding.

A ood chain is a sequence o organisms, each o which eeds on the previous
one. There are usually between two and ve organisms in a ood chain. It is
rare or there to be more organisms in the chain. As they do not obtain ood
rom other organisms, producers are always the rst organisms in a ood
chain. The subsequent organisms are consumers. Primary consumers eed
on producers; secondary consumers eed on primary consumers; tertiary
consumers eed on secondary consumers, and so on. No consumers eed on
the last organism in a ood chain. Consumers obtain energy rom the carbon
compounds in the organisms on which they eed. The arrows in a ood chain
thereore indicate the direction o energy fow.

Figure 4 is an example o a ood chain rom the orests around Iguazu
alls in northern Argentina.

 Figure 4

Respiration and energy release

Energy released by respiration is used in living organisms
and converted to heat.

Living organisms need energy or cell activities such as these:

 Synthesizing large molecules like DNA, RNA and proteins.

 Pumping molecules or ions across membranes by active transport.

 Moving things around inside the cell, such as chromosomes or vesicles,
or in muscle cells the protein bres that cause muscle contraction.

ATP supplies energy or these activities. Every cell produces its own
ATP supply.

215

14 E co lo g y

All cells can produce ATP by cell respiration. In this process carbon
compounds such as carbohydrates and lipids are oxidized. These
oxidation reactions are exothermic and the energy released is used
in endothermic reactions to make ATP. So cell respiration transers
chemical energy rom glucose and other carbon compounds to ATP. The
reason or doing this is that the chemical energy in carbon compounds
such as glucose is not immediately usable by the cell, but the chemical
energy in ATP can be used directly or many dierent activities.

The second law o thermodynamics states that energy transormations
are never 1 00% efcient. Not all o the energy rom the oxidation
o carbon compounds in cell respiration is transerred to ATP. The
remainder is converted to heat. S ome heat is also produced when ATP is
used in cell activities. Muscles warm up when they contract or example.
Energy rom ATP may reside or a time in large molecules when they
have been synthesized, such as DNA and proteins, but when these
molecules are eventually digested the energy is released as heat.

data-base questions 20

Figure 5 shows the results o an experiment in respiration rate (mW g1) 15
which yellow- billed magpies (Pica nuttalli) were
put in a cage in which the temperature could 10
be controlled. The birds rate o respiration
was measured at seven dierent temperatures, 5
rom 1 0 C to +40 C. Between 1 0 C and
30 C the magpies maintained constant body
temperature, but above 30 C body temperature
increased.

a) Describe the relationship between external

temperature and respiration rate in yellow- 0 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
temperature (C)
billed magpies. [3]

b) Explain the change in respiration rate as  Figure 5 Cell respiration rates at diferent temperatures in
temperature drops rom +1 0 C to 1 0 C. [3] yellow-billed magpies

c) Suggest a reason or the change in d) Suggest two reasons or the variation in
respiration rate as temperature increased
rom 30 C to 40 C. respiration rate between the birds at each

[2] temperature. [2]

Heat energy in ecosystems

Living organisms cannot convert heat to other forms
of energy.

Living organisms can perorm various energy conversions:
 Light energy to chemical energy in photosynthesis.
 Chemical energy to kinetic energy in muscle contraction.
 Chemical energy to electrical energy in nerve cells.
 Chemical energy to heat energy in heat-generating adipose tissue.
They cannot convert heat energy into any other orm o energy.

216

4.2 enerGy Flow

Heat losses from ecosystems acivi

Heat is lost rom ecosystems. thikig bu g
chgs
Heat resulting rom cell respiration makes living organisms warmer.
This heat can be useul in making cold-blooded animals more active. What energy conversions
Birds and mammals increase their rate o heat generation i necessary to are required to shoot a
maintain their constant body temperatures. basketball?

According to the laws o thermodynamics in physics, heat passes rom What is the nal orm o the
hotter to cooler bodies, so heat produced in living organisms is all eventually energy?
lost to the abiotic environment. The heat may remain in the ecosystem or
a while, but ultimately is lost, or example when heat is radiated into the
atmosphere. Ecologists assume that all energy released by respiration or use
in cell activities will ultimately be lost rom an ecosystem.

expiig h gh f fd chis

Use theories to explain natural phenomena: the
concept o energy fow explains the limited length
o ood chains.

I we consider the diet o a top carnivore that is at the end o a ood
chain, we can work out how many stages there are in the ood chain
leading up to it. For example, i an osprey eeds on sh such as salmon
that ed on shrimps, which ed on phytoplankton, there are our
stages in the ood chain.

There are rarely more than our or ve stages in a ood chain. We
might expect ood chains to be limitless, with one species being eaten
by another ad innitum. This does not happen. In ecology, as in all
branches o science, we try to explain natural phenomena such as the
restricted length o ood chains using scientic theories. In this case it
is the concept o energy fow along ood chains and the energy losses
that occur between trophic levels that can provide an explanation.

Energy losses and ecosystems  Figure 6 An inrared camera image o an
Arican grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus)
Energy losses between trophic levels restrict the length shows how much heat is being released to the
o ood chains and the biomass o higher trophic levels. environment by dierent parts o its body

Biomass is the total mass o a group o organisms. It consists o the cells and  Figure 7 The osprey (Pandion halietus) is a
tissues o those organisms, including the carbohydrates and other carbon fsh-eating top carnivore
compounds that they contain. Because carbon compounds have chemical
energy, biomass has energy. Ecologists can measure how much energy is 217
added per year by groups o organisms to their biomass. The results are
calculated per square metre o the ecosystem so that dierent trophic levels
can be compared. When this is done, the same trend is always ound:
the energy added to biomass by each successive trophic level is less. In
secondary consumers, or example, the amount o energy is always less per
year per square metre o ecosystem than in primary consumers.

The reason or this trend is loss o energy between trophic levels.

 Most o the energy in ood that is digested and absorbed by
organisms in a trophic level is released by them in respiration or

41 E co lo g y

activity use in cell activities. It is thereore lost as heat. The only energy
available to organisms in the next trophic level is chemical energy in
Slmon nd soy carbohydrates and other carbon compounds that have not been used
up in cell respiration.
Most salmon eaten by
humans is produced in sh  The organisms in a trophic level are not usually entirely consumed
arms. The salmon have by organisms in the next trophic level. For example, locusts
traditionally been ed on sometimes consume all the plants in an area but more usually only
sh meal, mostly based on parts o some plants are eaten. Predators may not eat material rom
anchovies harvested othe the bodies o their prey such as bones or hair. E nergy in uneaten
coast oSouth America. These material passes to saprotrophs or detritivores rather than passing to
have become scarce and organisms in the next trophic level.
expensive. Feeds based on
plant products such as soy  Not all parts o ood ingested by the organisms in a trophic level are
beans are increasingly being digested and absorbed. Some material is indigestible and is egested
used. In terms oenergy ow, in eces. Energy in eces does not pass on along the ood chain and
which othese human diets is instead passes to saprotrophs or detritivores.
most and least efcient?
Because o these losses, only a small proportion o the energy in
1 Salmon ed on sh meal the biomass o organisms in one trophic level will ever become part o
the biomass o organisms in the next trophic level. The fgure o 1 0% is
2 Salmon ed on soy beans oten quoted, but the level o energy loss between trophic levels is
variable. As the losses occur at each stage in a ood chain, there is less and
3 Soy beans. less energy available to each successive trophic level. Ater only a ew
stages in a ood chain the amount o energy remaining would not be
enough to support another trophic level. For this reason the number o
trophic levels in ood chains is restricted.

Biomass, measured in grams, also diminishes along ood chains, due
to loss o carbon dioxide and water rom respiration and loss rom the
ood chain o uneaten or undigested parts o organisms. The biomass
o higher trophic levels is thereore usually smaller than that o lower
levels. There is generally a higher biomass o producers, the lowest
trophic level o all, than o any other trophic level.

decomposers secondary consumer Pyramids of energy
(16,000 kJ m2 yr1) (200 kJ m2 yr1)
Quantitative representations oenergy ow using
primary consumer pyramids oenergy.
(2,500 kJ m2 yr1)
The amount o energy converted to new biomass by each trophic level in
plankton an ecological community can be represented with a pyramid o energy.
(150,000 kJ m2 yr1) This is a type o bar chart with a horizontal bar or each trophic level.
The amounts o energy should be per unit area per year. Oten the units
 Figure 8 An energy pyramid for an aquatic are kilojoules per metre squared per year (kJ m-2 yr-1) . The pyramid
ecosystem (not to scale) should be stepped, not triangular, starting with the producers in the
lowest bar. The bars should be labelled producer, frst consumer, second
secondary consumer consumer and so on. I a suitable scale is chosen, the length o each bar
(3,000 MJ m2 yr1) can be proportional to the amount o energy that it shows.

primary consumer Figure 8 shows an example o a pyramid o energy or an aquatic
(7,000 MJ m2 yr1) ecosystem. To be more accurate, the bars should be drawn with relative
widths that match the relative energy content at each trophic level. Figure
producers 9 shows a pyramid o energy or grassland, with the bars correctly to scale.
(50,000 MJ m2 yr1)

 Figure 9 Pyramid of energy for grassland

218

4.2 enerGy Flow

dt-bs qustis: a simple food web

A sinkhole is a surace eature which orms when an underground
cavern collapses. Montezuma Well in the Sonoran desert in Arizona is
a sinkhole flled with water. It is an aquatic ecosystem that lacks fsh,
due in part to the extremely high concentrations o dissolved CO2. The
dominant top predator is Belostoma bakeri, a giant water insect that can
grow to 70 mm in length.

Figure 1 0 shows a ood web or Montezuma Well.

1 C ompare the roles o Belostoma bakeri and Ranatra montezuma

within the ood web. [2]

2 Deduce, with a reason, which organism occupies more [2]
than one trophic level.

3 Deduce using P values:

a) what would be the most common ood chain in this web [2]
b) what is the preerred prey o B. bakeri? [1 ]
4 Construct a pyramid o energy or the frst and second
trophic levels. [3]

5 Calculate the percentage o energy lost between the frst and

second trophic levels. [2]

6 Discuss the difculties o classiying organisms into [2]
trophic levels.

7 Outline the additional inormation that would be required to [1 ]
complete the pyramid o energy or the third and ourth
trophic level.

Ranatra montezuma Belostoma bakeri
235,000 kJ ha1 yr1 588,000 kJ ha1 yr1
P = 1.0 gm2 yr1 P = 2.8 gm2 yr1

Telebasis salva
1,587,900 kJ ha1 yr1
P = 7.9 gm2 yr1

Hyalella montezuma
30,960,000 kJ ha1 yr1
P = 215 gm2 yr1

phytoplankton - Metaphyton piphyton
234,342,702 kJ ha1 yr1 427,078,320 kJ ha1 yr1
P = 602 g C m2 yr1 P = 1,096 g C m2 yr1

 Figure 10 A food web for Montezuma Well. P values represent the biomass stored
in the population of that organism each year. Energy values represent the energy
equivalent of that biomass. Arrows indicate trophic linkages and arrow thickness
indicates the relative amount of energy transferred between trophic levels

219

14 E co lo g y

4.3 carbon yling

Understanding Appliations

 Autotrophs convert carbon dioxide into  Estimation o carbon fuxes due to processes in
carbohydrates and other carbon compounds. the carbon cycle.

 In aquatic habitats carbon dioxide is present as  Analysis o data rom atmosphere monitoring
a dissolved gas and hydrogen carbonate ions. stations showing annual fuctuations.

 Carbon dioxide diuses rom the atmosphere or Skills
water into autotrophs.
 Construct a diagram o the carbon cycle.
 Carbon dioxide is produced by respiration and
diuses out o organisms into water or the Nature o siene
atmosphere.
 Making accurate, quantitative measurements:
 Methane is produced rom organic matter it is important to obtain reliable data on the
in anaerobic conditions by methanogenic concentration o carbon dioxide and methane
archaeans and some diuses into the in the atmosphere.
atmosphere.

 Methane is oxidized to carbon dioxide and
water in the atmosphere.

 Peat orms when organic matter is not ully
decomposed because o anaerobic conditions
in waterlogged soils.

 Partially decomposed organic matter rom past
geological eras was converted into oil and gas
in porous rocks or into coal.

 Carbon dioxide is produced by the combustion
o biomass and ossilized organic matter.

 Animals such as ree-building corals and molluscs
have hard parts that are composed ocalcium
carbonate and can become ossilized in limestone.

carbon fxation

Autotrophs convert carbon dioxide into carbohydrates
and other carbon compounds.

Autotrophs absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert
it into carbohydrates, lipids and all the other carbon compounds
that they require. This has the effect of reducing the carbon dioxide
concentration of the atmosphere. The mean CO2 concentration of the
atmosphere is currently approximately 0.039% or 390 micromoles per
mole (mol/mol) but it is lower above parts of the Earths surface where
photosynthesis rates have been high.

220

4.3 carBon cyclinG

dt-bse quests: Carbon dioxide concentration

The two maps in fgure 1 were produced 4 a) Deduce the part o the Earth that had the
by NASA. They show the carbon dioxide
concentration o the atmosphere eight kilometres lowest mean carbon dioxide concentration
above the surace o the Earth, in May and
October 201 1 . between May and October 201 1 . [1 ]

1 State whether October is in the spring or b) Suggest reasons or the carbon dioxide
all(autumn) in the southern hemisphere. [1 ] concentration being lowest in this area. [2 ]

2 a) Distinguish between carbon dioxide [1 ]
concentrations in May and October
in the northern hemisphere.

b) Suggest reasons or the dierence. [2]

3 a) Distinguish between the carbon

dioxide concentrations in May between

the northern and the southern

hemisphere. [1 ]

b) Suggest reasons or the dierence. [2 ] Figure 1

carbon dioxide in solution

In aquatic habitats carbon dioxide is present as a
dissolved gas and hydrogen carbonate ions.

C arbon dioxide is soluble in water. It can either remain in water as atvt

a dissolved gas or it can combine with water to orm carbonic acid pH hges  k ps

(H2CO3) . Carbonic acid can dissociate to orm hydrogen and hydrogen Ecologists have monitored
pH in rock pools on sea
carbonate ions (H+ and H C O - ) . This explains how carbon dioxide can shores that contain animals
3 and also photosynthesizing
algae. The pH o the
reduce the pH o water. water rises and alls in
a 24-hour cycle, due to
Both dissolved carbon dioxide and hydrogen carbonate ions are absorbed changes in carbon dioxide
by aquatic plants and other autotrophs that live in water. They use them concentration in the water.
to make carbohydrates and other carbon compounds. The lowest values o about
pH 7 have been ound during
Absorption of arbon dioxide the night, and the highest
values o about pH 10 have
Carbon dioxide difuses rom the atmosphere or water been ound when there was
into autotrophs. bright sunlight during the
day. What are the reasons or
Autotrophs use carbon dioxide in the production o carbon compounds these maxima and minima?
by photosynthesis or other processes. This reduces the concentration The pH in natural pools or
o carbon dioxide inside autotrophs and sets up a concentration articial aquatic mesocosms
gradient between cells in autotrophs and the air or water around. could be monitored using
Carbon dioxide thereore diuses rom the atmosphere or water into data loggers.
autotrophs.
221
In land plants with leaves this diusion usually happens through
stomata in the underside o the leaves. In aquatic plants the entire
surace o the leaves and stems is usually permeable to carbon dioxide,
so diusion can be through any part o these parts o the plant.

14 E co lo g y

Release of carbon dioxide from cell respiration

Carbon dioxide is produced by respiration and difuses out
o organisms into water or the atmosphere.

Carbon dioxide is a waste product o aerobic cell respiration. It is
produced in all cells that carry out aerobic cell respiration. These can be
grouped according to trophic level o the organism:

 non-photosynthetic cells in producers or example root cells in plants

 animal cells

 saprotrophs such as ungi that decompose dead organic matter.

Carbon dioxide produced by respiration diuses out o cells and passes
into the atmosphere or water that surrounds these organisms.

data-base questions: Data-logging pH in an aquarium

Figure 2 shows the pH and light intensity pH sensor (pH) light intensity 100
in an aquarium containing a varied 7.50 pH 90
community o organisms including 80
pondweeds, newts and other animals. 7.45 light intensity /arbitrary units
The data was obtained by data logging
using a pH electrode and a light meter. 70
The aquarium was illuminated articially
to give a 24-hour cycle o light and dark 7.40 60
using a lamp controlled by a timer.
50

7.35 40

1 Explain the changes in light 30
intensity during the experiment. [2]
7.30 20

10

2 Determine how many days the 7.25 0
6.02:45:09
data logging covers. [2] 0.14:02:31 0.23:13:11 3.08:23:50 4.17:34:30
06 February 2013 14:02:31 absolute time (d.hh:mm:ss)
3 a) Deduce the trend in pH in
Figure 2
the light. [1 ]
4 a) Deduce the trend in pH in darkness. [1 ]

b) Explain this trend. [2] b) Explain this trend. [2]

Methanogenesis

Methane is produced rom organic matter in anaerobic
conditions by methanogenic archaeans and some
difuses into the atmosphere.

In 1 776 Alessandro Volta collected bubbles o gas emerging rom mud in
a reed bed on the margins o Lake Maggiore in Italy, and ound that it
was infammable. He had discovered methane, though Volta did not give
it this name. Methane is produced widely in anaerobic environments, as
it is a waste product o a type o anaerobic respiration.

Three dierent groups o anaerobic prokaryotes are involved.

1 Bacteria that convert organic matter into a mixture o organic acids,
alcohol, hydrogen and carbon dioxide.

222

4.3 carBon cyclinG

2 Bacteria that use the organic acids and alcohol to produce acetate, Figure 3 Waterlogged woodlanda typical
carbon dioxide and hydrogen. habitat for methanogenic prokaryotes

3 Archaeans that produce methane rom carbon dioxide, hydrogen and
acetate. They do this by two chemical reactions:

CO2 + 4H2  CH4 + 2H2O
CH COOH  CH + CO

3 42

The archaeans in this third group are thereore methanogenic. They
carry out methanogenesis in many anaerobic environments:

 Mud along the shores and in the bed o lakes.

 Swamps, mires, mangrove orests and other wetlands where the soil
or peat deposits are waterlogged.

 Guts o termites and o ruminant mammals such as cattle and sheep.

 Landfll sites where organic matter is in wastes that have been
buried.

Some o the methane produced by archaeans in these anaerobic
environments diuses into the atmosphere. Currently the concentration
in the atmosphere is between 1 .7 and 1 .85 micromoles per mole.
Methane produced rom organic waste in anaerobic digesters is not
allowed to escape and instead is burned as a uel.

oxidatin f methane

Methane is oxidized to carbon dioxide and water
in the atmosphere.

Molecules o methane released into the atmosphere persist there
on average or only 1 2 years, because it is naturally oxidized in
the stratosphere. Monatomic oxygen (O) and highly reactive
hydroxyl radicals (OH) are involved in methane oxidation. This
explains why atmospheric concentrations are not high, despite large
amounts o production o methane by both natural processes and
human activities.

Peat frmatin Figure 4 Peat deposits form a blanket on a
boggy hill top at Bwlch Groes in North Wales
Peat forms when organic matter is not fully decomposed
because of anaerobic conditions in waterlogged soils.

In many soils all organic matter such as dead leaves rom plants is
eventually digested by saprotrophic bacteria and ungi. Saprotrophs
obtain the oxygen that they need or respiration rom air spaces
in the soil. In some environments water is unable to drain out
o soils so they become waterlogged and anaerobic. Saprotrophs
cannot thrive in these conditions so dead organic matter is not ully
decomposed. Acidic conditions tend to develop, urther inhibiting
saprotrophs and also methanogens that might break down the
organic matter.

223

14 E co lo g y

data-base questions: Release of carbon from tundra soils

Soils in tundra ecosystems typically contain large either 7 or 1 5C. Some samples were kept moist (M)
amounts o carbon in the orm o peat. This and others were saturated with water (W) . The
accumulates because o low rates o decomposition initial carbon content o the soils was measured
o dead plant organic matter by saprotrophs. To and the amount o carbon dioxide given o during
investigate this, ecologists collected samples o soil the experiment was monitored. The bar chart in
rom areas o tussock vegetation near Toolik Lake fgure 5 shows the results.
in Alaska. Some o the areas had been ertilized
with nitrogen and phosphorus every year or the 1 a) State the eect o increasing the [2]
previous eight years (TF) and some had not (TC). temperature o the soils on the rate
The soils were incubated or 1 00-day periods at o release o carbon.

40 b) Explain the reasons or this eect. [2]

TC 2 a) Compare the rates o release o carbon in
30 TF
percentage of initial C moist soils with those in soils saturated

with water. [2]

20 b) Suggest reasons or the dierences. [2]

10 3 Outline the eects o ertilizers on rates o

0 release o carbon rom the soils. [2]
7M
4 Discuss whether dierences in temperature,
Figure 5
amount o water in the soil or amount o

7W 15M 15W ertilizer have the greatest impact on the
treatment group
release o carbon. [2]

Large quantities o partially decomposed organic matter have
accumulated in some ecosystems and become compressed to orm a dark
brown acidic material called peat. About 3% o the Earths land surace
is covered by peat and as the depth is ten metres or more in some places,
the total quantities o this material are immense.

Figure 6 Coal at a power station Fossilized organic matter

224 Partially decomposed organic matter from past geological
eras was converted into oil and gas in porous rocks or
into coal.

Carbon and some compounds o carbon are chemically very stable and
can remain unchanged in rocks or hundreds o millions o years. There
are large deposits o carbon rom past geological eras. These deposits are
the result o incomplete decomposition o organic matter and its burial
in sediments that became rock.

 Coal is ormed when deposits o peat are buried under other
sediments. The peat is compressed and heated, gradually turning into
coal. Large coal deposits were ormed during the Pennsylvanian sub-
period o the Carbonierous. There was a cycle o sea level rises and
alls; coastal swamps ormed as the level ell and were destroyed and
buried when the level rose and the sea spread inland. Each cycle has
let a seam o coal.

4.3 carBon cyclinG

 Oil and natural gas are ormed in the mud at the bottom o seas and
lakes. Conditions are usually anaerobic and so decomposition is oten
incomplete. As more mud or other sediments are deposited the partially
decomposed matter is compressed and heated. C hemical changes occur,
which produce complex mixtures o liquid carbon compounds or gases.
We call these mixtures crude oil and natural gas. Methane orms the
largest part o natural gas. Deposits are ound where there are porous
rocks that can hold them such as shales and also impervious rocks
above and below the porous rocks that prevent the deposits escape.

combustion Figure 7 Carbon dioxide is released by
combustion of the leaves of sugar cane
Carbon dioxide is produced by the combustion of biomass
and fossilized organic matter. Figure 8 Kodonophylluma Silurian coral, in
limestone from Wenlock Edge. The calcium
I organic matter is heated to its ignition temperature in the presence carbonate skeletons of the coral are clearly
o oxygen it will set light and burn. The oxidation reactions that occur visible embedded in more calcium carbonate
are called combustion. The products o complete combustion are carbon that precipitated 420 million years ago in
dioxide and water. shallow tropical seas

In some parts o the world it is natural or there to be periodic fres in Figure 9 Chalk cliffs on the south coast of
orests or grassland. Carbon dioxide is released rom the combustion o England. Chalk is a form of limestone that
the biomass in the orest or grassland. In these areas the trees and other consists almost entirely of 90-million-year-
organisms are oten well adapted to fres and communities regenerate old shells of tiny unicellular animals called
rapidly aterwards. fo ra m in ife ra

In other areas fres due to natural causes are very unusual, but humans 225
sometimes cause them to occur. Fire is used to clear areas o tropical
rainorest or planting oil palms or or cattle ranching. Crops o sugar
cane are traditionally burned shortly beore they are harvested. The dry
leaves burn o, leaving the harvestable stems.

Coal, oil and natural gas are dierent orms o ossilized organic
matter. They are all burned as uels. The carbon atoms in the carbon
dioxide released may have been removed rom the atmosphere by
photosynthesizing plants hundreds o millions o years ago.

limestone

Animals such as reef-building corals and molluscs have
hard parts that are composed of calcium carbonate and
can become fossilized in limestone.

Some animals have hard body parts composed o calcium carbonate
( C aC O 3) :
 mollusc shells contain calcium carbonate;

 hard corals that build rees produce their exoskeletons by secreting
calcium carbonate.

When these animals die, their sot parts are usually decomposed
quickly. In acid conditions the calcium carbonate dissolves away but in
neutral or alkaline conditions it is stable and deposits o it rom hard
animal parts can orm on the sea bed. In shallow tropical seas calcium

14 E co lo g y

carbonate is also deposited by precipitation in the water. The result is
limestone rock, where the deposited hard parts o animals are oten
visible as ossils.

Approximately 1 0% o all sedimentary rock on Earth is limestone. About
1 2% o the mass o the calcium carbonate is carbon, so huge amounts o
carbon are locked up in limestone rock on Earth.

carbon yle diagrams Diagrams can be used to represent the carbon
cycle. Text boxes can be used or pools and labeled
Construct a diagram of the carbon cycle. arrows or fuxes. Figure 1 0 shows an illustrated
diagram which can be converted to a diagram o
Ecologists studying the carbon cycle and the text boxes and arrows.
recycling o other elements use the terms pool and
fux. Figure 1 0 only shows the carbon cycle or
terrestrial ecosystems. A separate diagram could
 A pool is a reserve o the element. It can be be constructed or marine or aquatic ecosystems,
organic or inorganic. For example the carbon or a combined diagram or all ecosystems. In
dioxide in the atmosphere is an inorganic pool marine and aquatic ecosystems, the inorganic
o carbon. The biomass o producers in an reserve o carbon is dissolved carbon dioxide
ecosystem is an organic pool. and hydrogen carbonate, which is absorbed by
producers and by various means is released back
 A fux is the transer o the element rom into the water.
one pool to another. An example o carbon
fux is the absorption o carbon dioxide
rom the atmosphere and its conversion by
photosynthesis to plant biomass.

CO2 in

cell respiration atmosphere photosynthesis
in saprotrophs in pcreoldl urecseprsiration
and detritivores

combustion of fossil fuels cell respiration carbon in
in consumers organic

compounds
in producers

death

carbon in dead egestion fe e d i n g
organic matter
incomplete
decomposition
and fossilization
of organic matter

coal oil and gas

Figure 10 Carbon cycle

226

4.3 carBon cyclinG

carbon fuxes

Estimation o carbon fuxes due to processes in the carbon cycle.

The carbon cycle diagram in gure 1 0 shows Pess F u x/g g t   es
processes that transer carbon rom one pool to  e - 1
another but it does not show the quantities o these Photosynthesis
fuxes. It is not possible to measure global carbon Cell respiration 120
fuxes precisely but as these quantities are o great Ocean uptake 119.6
interest, scientists have produced estimates or Ocean loss
them. Estimates are based on many measurements Deorestation and land use 92.8
in individual natural ecosystems or in mesocosms. changes 90.0
Burial in marine sediments
Global carbon fuxes are extremely large so Combustion o ossil uels 1.6
estimates are in gigatonnes (petagrams) . One
gigatonne is 1 ,01 5 grams. Table 1 shows estimates Table 1 0.2
based on Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics, Sarmiento 6.4
and Gruber, 2006, Princeton University Press.

dt-bse quests: Oak woodland and carbon dioxide concentrations

Carbon fuxes have been measured since 1 998 in 1 Calculate whether the carbon pool in the

deciduous woodland at Alice Holt Research Forest biomass o the orest increases or decreases

in E ngland. The trees are mainly oaks, Quercus on more days in the year. [1 ]

robur and Quercus petraea, with some ash, Fraxinus 2 Deduce the months in which the carbon pool
excelsior. They were planted in 1 93 5 and are now
nearly 20 metres tall. o biomass in the orest was highest

and lowest. [2]

Carbon dioxide concentrations are measured 3 Explain the reasons or increases in the [4]
20 times a second. From these measurements carbon pool o biomass in the orest
the net ecosystem production can be deduced. during part o the year and decreases in
This is the net fux o carbon dioxide between other parts.
the orest and the atmosphere. Positive values

indicate an increase in the carbon pool o 4 State the annual carbon fux to or rom the

the orest and negative values indicate a orest. [2]

decrease due to net loss o carbon dioxide. The 5 Suggest a reason based on the data or [1 ]
graph shows the daily average net ecosystem encouraging the planting o more
production or several years and also the oak orests.
cumulative net ecosystem production.

20 25

20
15

15
10

10
daily average NEP (kg CO2 ha1 h1)
cumulative NEP (t CO2 ha1)
55

0
0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 530

5
5 10

10 15
day ofyear

227

14 E co lo g y

Environmental monitoring

Making accurate, quantitative measurements: it is important to obtain reliable data
on the concentration o carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere.

Carbon dioxide and methane concentrations carbon dioxide concentrations to rise rom
in the atmosphere have very important 397 micromoles per mole in 201 4 to a level
eects. Carbon dioxide concentrations aect above 600 by the end o the century.
photosynthesis rates and the pH o seawater. B oth
gases infuence global temperatures and as a result Reliable data are an essential prerequisite or
the extent o ice sheets at the poles. Indirectly evaluating hypotheses and predictions such as
they thereore aect sea levels and the position o these. Reliable measurements o atmospheric
coast lines. Through their eects on the amount carbon dioxide and methane concentration are
o heat energy in the oceans and the atmosphere needed over as long a period as possible beore
they aect ocean currents, the distribution o we can evaluate the past and possible uture
rainall and also the requency and severity o consequences o human activity.
extreme weather events such as hurricanes.
Data on concentrations o gases in the atmosphere
Consider these hypotheses and predictions: is collected by the Global Atmosphere Watch
programme o the World Meteorological
 The carbon dioxide concentration o the Organization, an agency o the United Nations.
atmosphere is currently higher than at any Research stations in various parts o the world
time in the past twenty million years. now monitor the atmosphere, but Mauna Loa
Observatory on Hawaii has records rom the
 Human activities have increased the carbon longest period. Carbon dioxide concentrations
dioxide and methane concentrations in the have been measured rom 1 959 onwards and
Earths atmosphere. methane rom 1 984. These and other reliable
records are o immense value to scientists.
 Human activity will cause atmospheric

Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide

Analysis o data rom atmosphere
monitoring stations showing
annual fuctuations.

Data rom atmosphere monitoring stations is
reely available allowing any person to analyse
it. There are both long-term trends and annual
fuctuations in the data. The Mauna Loa
Observatory in Hawaii produces vast amounts
o data and data rom this and other monitoring
stations are available or analysis.

Figure 11 Hawaii from space. Mauna Loa is near the
centre of the largest island

228

4.4 climate cHanGe

4.4 c hg

Understandin Applications

 Carbon dioxide and water vapour are the most  Correlations between global temperatures and
signicant greenhouse gases. carbon dioxide concentrations on Earth.

 Other gases including methane and nitrogen  Evaluating claims that human activities are not
oxides have less impact. causing climate change.

 The impact o a gas depends on its ability to  Threats to coral rees rom increasing
absorb long-wave radiation as well as on its concentrations o dissolved carbon dioxide.
concentration in the atmosphere.
Nature of science
 The warmed Earth emits longer-wave radiation
(heat) .  Assessing claims: assessment o the claims
that human activities are not causing climate
 Longer-wave radiation is reabsorbed by change.
greenhouse gases which retains the heat in the
atmosphere.

 Global temperatures and climate patterns are
infuenced by concentrations o greenhouse
gases.

 There is a correlation between rising atmospheric
concentrations o carbon dioxide since the start
o the industrial revolution two hundred years ago
and average global temperatures.

 Recent increases in atmospheric carbon
dioxide are largely due to increases in the
combustion o ossilized organic matter.

greenhouse ases

Carbon dioxide and water vapour are the most signicant
greenhouse gases.

The Earth is kept much warmer than it otherwise would be by gases
in the atmosphere that retain heat. The effect of these gases has been
likened to that of the glass that retains heat in a greenhouse and they are
therefore known as greenhouse gases, though the mechanism of heat
retention is not the same.

The greenhouse gases that have the largest warming effect on the Earth
are carbon dioxide and water vapour.

 Carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere by cell respiration
in living organisms and also by combustion of biomass and fossil

229

14 E co lo g y

uels. It is removed rom the atmosphere by photosynthesis and by
dissolving in the oceans.

 Water vapour is ormed by evaporation rom the oceans and also
transpiration in plants. It is removed rom the atmosphere by rainall
and snow.

Water continues to retain heat ater it condenses to orm droplets o
liquid water in clouds. The water absorbs heat energy and radiates it
back to the Earths surace and also refects the heat energy back. This
explains why the temperature drops so much more quickly at night in
areas with clear skies than in areas with cloud cover.

Figure 1 Satellite image of Hurricane Andrew in other greenhuse gases
the Gulf of Mexico. Hurricanes are increasing in
frequency and intensity as a result of increases Other gases including methane and nitrogen oxides have
in heat retention by greenhouse gases less impact.

Although carbon dioxide and water vapour are the most signicant
greenhouse gases there are others that have a smaller but nonetheless
signicant eect.

 Methane is the third most signicant greenhouse gas. It is emitted
rom marshes and other waterlogged habitats and rom landll
sites where organic wastes have been dumped. It is released during
extraction o ossil uels and rom melting ice in polar regions.

 Nitrous oxide is another signicant greenhouse gas. It is released
naturally by bacteria in some habitats and also by agriculture and
vehicle exhausts.

The two most abundant gases in the Earths atmosphere, oxygen and
nitrogen, are not greenhouse gases as they do not absorb longer-wave
radiation. All o the greenhouse gases together thereore make up less
than 1 % o the atmosphere.

Assessing the impact f greenhuse gases

The impact of a gas depends on its ability to absorb
long-wave radiation as well as on its concentration in the
atmosphere.

Two actors together determine the warming impact o a greenhouse gas:

 how readily the gas absorbs long-wave radiation; and

 the concentration o the gas in the atmosphere.

For example, methane causes much more warming per molecule
than carbon dioxide, but as it is at a much lower concentration in the
atmosphere its impact on global warming is less.

The concentration o a gas depends on the rate at which it is released
into the atmosphere and how long on average it remains there. The rate
at which water vapour enters the atmosphere is immensely rapid, but it
remains there only nine days on average, whereas methane remains in
the atmosphere or twelve years and carbon dioxide or even longer.

230

4.4 climate cHanGe

lon-waveenth emissions from Earth TOK

The warmed Earth emits longer-wave radiation. Qusos xs bou h ry
o sf phoo. wh
The warmed surface of the Earth absorbs short-wave energy from the osqus gh hs hv or h
sun and then re-emits it, but at much longer wavelengths. Most of the pub prpo d udrsdg
re-emitted radiation is infrared, with a peak wavelength of 1 0,000 nm. o s?
The peak wavelength of solar radiation is 400 nm.
Much o what science investigates
Figure 2 shows the range of wavelengths of solar radiation that pass involves entities and concepts beyond
through the atmosphere to reach the Earths surface and warm it (red) everyday experience o the world,
and the range of much longer wavelengths emitted by the Earth that such as the nature and behaviour
pass out through the atmosphere (blue) . The smooth red and blue curves o electromagnetic radiation or the
show the range of wavelengths expected to be emitted by bodies of the build-up o invisible gases in the
temperature of the Earth and the sun. atmosphere. This makes it difcult
or scientists to convince the general
spectral intensity public that such phenomenon
actually exist  particularly when
the consequences o accepting their
existance might run counter to value
systems or entrenched belies.

UV Visible I n fra re d
0.2
1 10 70

wavelength (m)

Figure 2

greenhouse ases

Longer-wave radiation is reabsorbed by greenhouse gases which retains
the heat in the atmosphere.

2530% of the short-wavelength radiation from A far higher percentage of the longer-wavelength
the sun that is passing through the atmosphere radiation re-emitted by the surface of the Earth is
is absorbed before it reaches the Earths surface. absorbed before it has passed out to space. Between
Most of the solar radiation absorbed is ultraviolet 70% and 85% is captured by greenhouse gases in
light, which is absorbed by ozone. 7075% of solar the atmosphere. This energy is re-emitted, some
radiation therefore reaches the Earths surface and towards the Earth. The effect is global warming.
much of this is converted to heat. Without it the mean temperature at the Earths
surface would be about 1 8C.

Key

short-wave radiation
from the sun

long-wave radiation
from earth

Figure 3 The greenhouse efect

231

14 E co lo g y

Greenhouse gases in the Earths atmosphere individual gases. The wavelengths re-emitted by
only absorb energy in specifc wavebands. the E arth are between 5 and 70nm. Water vapour,
Figure 4 below shows total percentage absorption carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide all
o radiation by the atmosphere. The graph also absorb some o these wavelengths, so each o them
shows the bands o wavelengths absorbed by is a greenhouse gas.

percent100 Total absorption
and scattering
75 1
10 70
50

25

0
0.2

Water vapour

major components Carbon dioxide

Oxygen and ozone

Methane

0.2 1 10 Nitrous oxide
wavelength (m) 70
Figure 4

global temperatures and carbon dioxide concentrations

Correlations between global temperatures and carbon dioxide concentrations
on Earth.

I the concentration o any o the greenhouse gases Antarctica. During this part o the current Ice Age
in the atmosphere changes, we can expect the there has been a repeating pattern o rapid periods
size o its contribution to the greenhouse eect to o warming ollowed by much longer periods o
change and global temperatures to rise or all. We gradual cooling. There is a very striking correlation
can test this hypothesis using the carbon dioxide between carbon dioxide concentration and global
concentration o the atmosphere, because it has temperatures  the periods o higher carbon
changed considerably. dioxide concentration repeatedly coincide with
periods when the Earth was warmer.
To deduce carbon dioxide concentrations and
temperatures in the past, columns o ice have The same trend has been ound in other ice cores.
been drilled in the Antarctic. The ice has built up Data o this type are consistent with the hypothesis
over thousands o years, so ice rom deeper down that rises in carbon dioxide concentration increase
is older than ice near the surace. Bubbles o air the greenhouse eect. It is important always
trapped in the ice can be extracted and analysed to remember that correlation does not prove
to fnd the carbon dioxide concentration. Global causation, but in this case we know rom other
temperatures can be deduced rom ratios o research that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.
hydrogen isotopes in the water molecules. At least some o the temperature variation over
the past 800,000 years must thereore have been
Figure 5 shows results or an 800,000 year period due to rises and alls in atmospheric carbon dioxide
beore the present. They were obtained rom concentrations.
an ice core drilled in Dome C on the Antarctic
plateau by the European Project or Ice Coring in

232

4.4 climate cHanGe

C O 2 /p p m v 300
250
200

ure -380

(temperat - 410 warm
proxy) 9C

D/% -440 cold
0
800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000
age (years before present)

Figure 5 Data from the European Project for Ice Coring in the Antarctic Dome C ice core

d-bs qusos: CO concentrations and global temperatures
2

Figure 6 shows atmospheric carbon dioxide 0.6

concentrations. The red line shows direct temperature anomaly (C) Annual average
measurements at Mauna Loa O bservatory. 0.4 Five year average

The points show carbon dioxide 0.2
concentrations measured rom trapped air in

polar ice cores. 0

380

parts per million by volume 360 Direct measurments -0.2
Ice core measurments -0.4

340

1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
320

Figure 7

300

280 2 Compare the trends in carbon [2]
dioxide concentration and global
260 temperatures between 1 880 and 2008. [1 ]
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 [1 ]
3 Estimate the change in global average
Figure 6 temperature between [2]

Figure 7 shows a record o global average a) 1 900 and 2000
temperatures compiled by the NASA Goddard b) 1 905 and 2005
Institute or Space Studies. The green points are 4 a) Suggest reasons or global average
annual averages and the red curve is a rolling
ve-year average. The values are given as the temperatures alling or a ew
deviation rom the mean temperature between years during a period with an
1 961 and 1 990. overall trend o rising temperatures.

1 Discuss whether the measurements o [2] b) Discuss whether these alls [2]
carbon dioxide concentration rom indicate that carbon dioxide
ice cores are consistent with direct concentration does not infuence
measurements at Mauna Loa. global temperatures.

233

14 E co lo g y

greenhouse ases and climate patterns

Global temperatures and climate evaporation o water rom the oceans and
patterns are infuenced by thereore periods o rain are likely to be more
concentrations o greenhouse gases. requent and protracted. The amount o rain
delivered during thunderstorms and other intense
The surace o the Earth is warmer than it bursts is likely to increase very signicantly. In
would be with no greenhouse gases in the addition, higher ocean temperatures cause tropical
atmosphere. Mean temperatures are estimated to storms and hurricanes to be more requent and
be 3 2 C higher. I the concentration o any o the more powerul, with aster wind speeds.
greenhouse gases rises, more heat will be retained
and we should expect an increase in global average The consequences o any rise in global average
temperatures. temperature are unlikely to be evenly spread. Not
all areas would become warmer. The west coast
This does not mean that global average o Ireland and Scotland might become colder i
temperatures are directly proportional to the North Atlantic Current brought less warm
greenhouse gas concentrations. Other actors have water rom the Gul Stream to north-west Europe.
an infuence, including Milankovitch cycles in the The distribution o rainall would also be likely to
E arths orbit and variation in sunspot activity. Even change, with some areas becoming more prone
so, increases in greenhouse gas concentrations will to droughts and other areas to intense periods o
tend to cause higher global average temperatures rainall and fooding. Predictions about changes to
and also more requent and intense heat waves. weather patterns are very uncertain, but it is clear
that just a ew degrees o warming would cause very
Global temperatures infuence other aspects proound changes to the Earths climate patterns.
o climate. Higher temperatures increase the

data-base questions: Phenology temperature was obtained rom the records o
35 German climate stations.
Phenologists are biologists who study the timing
o seasonal activities in animals and plants, such as 1 Identiy the year in which:
the opening o tree leaves and the laying o eggs
by birds. Data such as these can provide evidence a) the leaves opened earliest [1 ]
o climate changes, including global warming. [1 ]
b) mean temperatures in March and
The date in the spring when new leaves open on April were at their lowest.
horse chestnut trees ( Aesculus hippocastaneum) has
been recorded in Germany every year since 1 951 . 2 Use the data in the graph to deduce the
Figure 8 shows the dierence between each ollowing:
years date o lea opening and the mean date o
lea opening between 1 970 and 2000. Negative a) the relationship between temperatures in
values indicate that the date o lea opening was
earlier than the mean. The graph also shows the March and April and the date o opening
dierence between each years mean temperature
during March and April and the overall mean o leaves on horse chestnut trees. [1 ]
temperature or these two months. The data or
b) whether there is evidence o global [2]
warming towards the end o the
2 0th century.

4 dierence in mean -15 Figure 8 The relationship
3 temperature / C -10 between temperature and
2 dierence in date of -5 horse chestnut leaf opening
1 leafopening / days in Germany since 1951
0 0
-1 5 Key:
-2 10 temperature
-3 15 leaf opening
-4 2000
1980 1990
1970 year

234

4.4 climate cHanGe

Industrialization and climate change Figure 9 During the industrial revolution
renewable sources of power including
There is a correlation between rising atmospheric wind were replaced with power generated
concentrations o carbon dioxide since the start o the by burning fossil fuels
industrial revolution two hundred years ago and average
global temperatures. TOK

The graph o atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past wh osus  upb
800,000 years shown in gure 5 indicates that there have been large v of rsk?
fuctuations. During glaciations the concentration dropped to as low as In situations where the public is at risk,
1 80 parts per million by volume. During warm interglacial periods they scientists are called upon to advise
rose as high as 300 ppm. The rise during recent times to concentrations governments on the setting opolicies
nearing 400 ppm is thereore unprecedented in this period. or restrictions to oset the risk. Because
scientic claims are based largely on
Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations were between 260 and inductive observation, absolute certainty
2 80 ppm until the late 1 8th century. This is when concentrations is difcult to establish. The precautionary
probably started to rise above the natural levels, but as the rise was principle argues that action to protect
initially very slight, it is impossible to say exactly when an unnatural rise the public must precede certainty o
in concentrations began. Much o the rise has happened since 1 950. risk when the potential consequences
or humanity are catastrophic. Principle
In the late 1 8th century the industrial revolution was starting in some 15 othe 1992 Rio Declaration on the
countries but the main impact o industrialization globally was in the Environment and Development stated
second hal o the 2 0th century. More countries became industrialized, the principle in this way:
and combustion o coal, oil and natural gas increased ever more rapidly, Where there are threats oserious or
with consequent increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. irreversible damage, lack oull scientic
certainty shall not be used as a reason
There is strong evidence or a correlation between atmospheric orpostponing cost-efective measures
carbon dioxide concentration and global temperatures, but as already to prevent environmental degradation.
explained, other actors have an eect so temperatures are not
directly proportional to carbon dioxide concentration. Nevertheless,
since the start o the industrial revolution the correlation between
rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and average global
temperatures is very marked.

Burning fossil fuels

Recent increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide are
largely due to increases in the combustion o ossilized
organic matter.

As the industrial revolution spread rom the late 1 8th century
onwards, increasing quantities o coal were being mined and burned,
causing carbon dioxide emissions. Energy rom combustion o the coal
provided a source o heat and power. D uring the 1 9 th century the
combustion o oil and natural gas became increasingly widespread in
addition to coal.

Increases in the burning o ossil uels were most rapid rom the
1 950s onwards and this coincides with the period o steepest rises
in atmospheric carbon dioxide. It seems hard to doubt the conclusion
that the burning o ossil uels has been a major contributory
actor in the rise o atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations to higher
levels than experienced on Earth or more than 800,000 years.

235

14 E co lo g y

data-base questions: Comparing CO emissions were higher in the year 2 000: Qatar, United
2
Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain. Suggest
The bar chart in gure 1 0 shows the cumulative CO
2

emissions rom ossil uels o the European Union

and ve individual countries between 1 950 and reasons or the dierence. [3]

2000. It also shows the total CO emissions including 3 Although cumulative CO2 emissions rom
2 combustion o ossil uels in Indonesia and

orest clearance and other land use changes.

1 Discuss reasons or higher cumulative CO2 Brazil between 1 950 and 2000 were relatively
emissions rom combustion o ossil uels in
low, total C O2 emissions were signicantly

the United States than in Brazil. [3] higher. S uggest reasons or this. [3]

2 Although cumulative emissions between 4 Australia ranked seventh in the world or
1 950 and 2000 were higher in the United
S tates than any other country, there were emissions o CO2 in 2000, but ourth when
our countries in which emissions per capita all greenhouse gases are included. Suggest a

reason or the dierence. [1 ]

30% Figure 10

25% CO2 from fossil fuels
CO2 from fossil fuels & land-use change

percent of world total 20%

15%

10%

5%

0% U.S. EU-25 Russia China Indonesia Brazil

Assessing claims and counter-claims

Assessing claims: assessment of the claims that human activities are not causing
climate change.

Climate change has been more hotly debated than  Global climate patterns are very complex

almost any other area o science. A search o the and it is dicult to make predictions about

internet will quickly reveal diametrically opposed the consequences o urther increases in

views, expressed very vocierously. The author greenhouse gas concentrations. There can

Michael Crichton portrayed climate change be tipping points in climate patterns where

scientists as eco-terrorists who were prepared to sudden massive changes occur. This makes

use mass murder to promote their work in his prediction even more dicult.

novel S tate o Fear. What reasons could there  The consequences o changes in global climate
be or such erce opposition to climate change patterns could be very severe or humans
science and or what reason do climate change and or other species so many eel that
scientists deend their ndings so vigorously? there is a need or immediate action even

These questions are worth discussing. There are i uncertainties remain in climate change

many actors that could be having an infuence: science. Companies make huge prots rom

 Scientists are trained to be cautious about their coal, oil and natural gas and it is in their
claims and to base their ideas on evidence. interests or ossil uel combustion to continue
They are expected to admit when there are to grow. It would not be surprising i they paid
uncertainties and this can give the impression or reports to be written that minimized the
that evidence is weaker than it actually is. risks o climate change.

236

4.4 climate cHanGe

oppsitin t the climate change science

Evaluating claims that human activities are not causing climate change.

Many claims that human activities are not causing Global warming is continuing but not with equal
climate change have been made in newspapers, on increases each year. Humans are emitting carbon
television and on the internet. One example o this is: dioxide by burning ossil uels and there is strong
evidence that carbon dioxide causes warming, so
Global warming stopped in 1 998, yet the claim is not supported by the evidence.
carbon dioxide concentrations have continued
to rise, so human carbon dioxide emissions Claims that human activities are not causing
cannot be causing global warming. climate change will continue and these claims need
to be evaluated. As always in science, we should
This claim ignores the act that temperatures on base our evaluations on reliable evidence. There
Earth are infuenced by many actors, not just is now considerable evidence about emissions o
greenhouse gas concentrations. Volcanic activity greenhouse gases by humans, about the eects o
and cycles in ocean currents can cause signicant these gases and about changing climate patterns.
variations rom year to year. B ecause o such Not all sources on the internet are trustworthy
actors, 1 998 was an unusually warm year and and we need to be careul to distinguish between
also because o them some recent years have been websites with objective assessments based on
cooler than they otherwise would have been. reliable evidence and others that show bias.

d-bs qusos: Uncertainty in temperature rise projections

Figure 1 1 shows computer-generated orecasts 6 AI B
or average global temperatures, based on eight 5 AI T
dierent scenarios or the changes in the emissions 4 AI FI
o greenhouse gases. The light green band includes 3 A2
the ull range o orecasts rom research centres 2 B1
around the world, and the dark green band shows 1 B2
the range o most o the orecasts. Figure 1 2 shows IS92a
orecasts or arctic temperatures, based on two o
the emissions scenarios.

1 Identiy the code or the least optimistic 0
1990 20002010202020302040205020602070208020902100
emissions scenario. [1 ]
Figure 11 Forecast global average temperatures
2 State the minimum and maximum orecasts
or average global temperature change. [2] 7 Discuss whether the uncertainty in temperature

3 Calculate the dierence between the A2 orecasts justies action or inaction. [4]
and B2 orecasts o global average
temperature rise. 8 Discuss whether it is possible to balance

[2] environmental risks with socio-economic

4 Compare the orecasts or arctic and livelihood risks or whether priorities need
temperatures with those or global
average temperatures. to be established. [4]

[2] 7
6 A2
5 Suggest uncertainties, apart rom [2] 5 B2
greenhouse gas emissions, which 4
aect orecasts or average global 3
temperatures over the next 1 00 years. 2
1
6 Discuss how much more condent we can be 0
in orecasts based on data rom a number o 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
dierent research centres, rather than one. [3 ]
Figure 12 Forecast arctic temperature

237

14 E co lo g y

coral reefs and arbon dioxide

Threats to coral rees rom increasing concentrations o dissolved carbon dioxide.

In addition to its contribution to global warming, make their skeletons. Also, i seawater ceases to
emissions o carbon dioxide are having eects be a saturated solution o carbonate ions, existing
on the oceans. Over 500 billion tonnes o carbon calcium carbonate tends to dissolve, so existing
dioxide released by humans since the start o the skeletons o ree-building corals are threatened.
industrial revolution have dissolved in the oceans. In 201 2 oceanographers rom more than 20
The pH o surace layers o the Earths oceans is countries met in Seattle and agreed to set up a
estimated to have been 8.1 79 in the late 1 8th global scheme or monitoring ocean acidication.
century when there had been little industrialization.
Measurements in the mid-1 990s showed that it had There is already evidence or concerns about
allen to 8.1 04 and current levels are approximately corals and coral rees. Volcanic vents near
8.069. This seemingly small change represents a the island o Ischia in the Gul o Naples have
30% acidication. Ocean acidication will become been releasing carbon dioxide into the water
more severe i the carbon dioxide concentration o or thousands o years, reducing the pH o the
the atmosphere continues to rise. seawater. In the area o acidied water there are
no corals, sea urchins or other animals that make
Marine animals such as ree-building corals that their skeletons rom calcium carbonate. In their
deposit calcium carbonate in their skeletons place other organisms fourish such as sea grasses
need to absorb carbonate ions rom seawater. and invasive algae. This could be the uture o
The concentration o carbonate ions in seawater coral rees around the world i carbon dioxide
is low, because they are not very soluble. continues to be emitted rom burning ossil uels.
Dissolved carbon dioxide makes the carbonate
concentration even lower as a result o some
interrelated chemical reactions. Carbon dioxide
reacts with water to orm carbonic acid, which
dissociates into hydrogen and hydrogen carbonate
ions. Hydrogen ions react with dissolved
carbonate ions, reducing their concentration.

CO2 + H2O  H2CO3  H+ + H C O -
3

H+ + C O 2 -  H C O -
3 3

I carbonate ion concentrations drop it is more Figure 13 Skeleton ofcalcium carbonate from a reef-building coral
dicult or ree-building corals to absorb them to

activity TOK

Draw a graph o oceanic wht re the potentil impcts of funding bis?
pH rom the 18th century
onwards, using the gures The costs o scientic research is oten met by grant agencies. Scientists submit
given in the text above, and research proposals to agencies, the application is reviewed and i successul,
extrapolate the curve to the research can proceed. Questions arise when the grant agency has a stake in
obtain an estimate o when the study's outcome. Further, grant applications might ask scientists to project
the pH might drop below 7. outcomes or suggest applications o the research beore it has even begun. The
sponsor may und several diferent research groups, suppressing results that
238 run counter to their interests and publishing those that support their industry.
For example, a 2006 review o studies examining the health efects o cell phone
use revealed that studies unded by the telecommunications industry were
statistically least likely to report a signicant efect. Pharmaceutical research,
nutrition research and climate change research are all areas where claims o
unding bias have been prominent in the media.

QueStionS

Questions

1 The total solar energy received by a grassland is Area of tree mortality/km2 4 Warm/dry
5  l05 kJ m-2 yr-1. The net production o the Drought Index 3 long-term average
grassland is 5  1 02 kJ m-2 yr-1 and its gross 2
production is 6  1 02 kJ m-2 yr-1. The total 1
energy passed on to primary consumers is 0
60 kJ m-2 yr-1. Only 1 0 per cent o this energy 1
is passed on to the secondary consumers. 2

3 Cool/moist

a) Calculate the energy lost by plant [2] 2000
respiration. 1500
1000
b) Construct a pyramid o energy or this 500

grassland. [3] 0
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Figure 15 Tree mortality and drought index

2 Figure 1 4 shows the energy fow through a a) Identiy the two periods when the drought
temperate orest. The energy fow is shown per
square metre per year (kJ m-2 yr-1) . index remained high or three or more

lost years. [2]
5 , 2 23 ,12 0
b) (i) Compare the beetle outbreaks in the

1 970s and 1 990s. [2]

sunlight (ii) Suggest reasons or the dierences
energy
5,266,800 respiration between the outbreaks. [2]
24,024
Figure 14 c) Predict rates o destruction o spruce
green 172 consumers trees in the uture, with reasons or
plants your answer.
[4]
14,448 storage

decomposers (e.g. wood)

5,036

a) The chart shows that 99.1 7 per cent o the 4 Figure 1 6 shows monthly average carbon
dioxide concentrations or Baring Head, New
Zealand and Alert, Canada.

sunlight energy in the temperate orest is 390
385
lost. Predict with a reason whether a greater CO2 concentration/ppm 380 Key
375 Alert station,
or lesser percentage o sunlight energy 370 Canada
365 Baring Head,
would be lost in desert. [2] 360 New Zealand
355
b) Only a small part o the net production 350
o plants in the temperate orest passes to 345
herbivores. Explain the reasons or this. [2] 340
335
3 Warmer temperatures avour some species 330
o pest, or example the spruce beetle. Since
the rst major outbreak in 1 992, it has killed 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04
approximately 400,000 hectares o trees in year
Alaska and the C anadian Yukon. The beetle
normally needs two years to complete its lie Figure 16
cycle, but it has recently been able to do it in
one year. The graphs in gure 1 5 show the a) Suggest why scientists have chosen such
drought index, a combination o temperatures areas as Mauna Loa, Baring Head and Alert
and precipitation, and the area o spruce trees as the locations or monitoring stations. [1 ]
destroyed annually.
b) Compare the trends illustrated in both

graphs. [2]

c) Explain why the graphs show dierent

patterns. [3]

239

41 e c o lo G y

5 Figure 1 7 shows the concentration o CO2 in the above tundra root taiga
atmosphere, measured in parts per million (ppm) .
ground above
In a orest, concentrations o CO2 change over the ground root
course o the day and change with height. The
soil
top o the orest is reerred to as the canopy.

soil

height/m 320 330 320 310 310 ppm grasslands deciduous forest
30 320
above above
Top forest canopy ground ground

20 soil root root
soil
10 340350 305
360
0 6 330
0
340
350 savannah equatorial forest

12 18 24 above above
time of day / hours gro u n d ground

Figure 17 soil soil
root root
a) (i) State the highest concentration o CO2

reached in the canopy. [1 ]

(ii) Determine the range o concentration

ound in the canopy. [2]

b) (i) State the time o day (or night) Figure 18 The distribution of nitrogen in the three organic
matters compartments for each of six major biomes
when the highest levels o CO2 are

detected. [1 ] a) Deduce what the above ground
compartment consists o in an ecosystem. [1 ]
(ii) The highest levels o CO2 are detected
just above the ground. Deduce two b) State which biome has the largest above

reasons why this is the case. [2] ground compartment. [1 ]

c) Give an example o an hour when CO2 c) Explain why it is difcult to grow crops in
concentrations are reasonably uniorm over
an area where equatorial orest has been

the ull range o heights. [1 ] cleared o its vegetation. [2]

d) State the name o the process carried out

6 Within an ecosystem, nitrogen can be stored by decomposers and detritus eeders that
in one o three organic matter compartments:
above ground, in roots and in the soil. releases CO2 into the atmosphere. [1 ]
Figure 1 8 shows the distribution o nitrogen
in the three organic matter compartments or e) Suggest why most o the nitrogen in a
each o six major biomes.
tundra ecosystem is in the soil. [1 ]

f) Explain why warming due to climate

change might cause a release o CO2 rom

tundra soil. [2]

240

5 EvOLutIOn and BIOdIvErsItY
CIEoLLcioB I O L O G Y

There is overwhelming evidence or the theory comparing their base or amino acid sequences.
that the diversity o lie has evolved, and Species are named and classifed using an
continues to evolve by natural selection. The internationally agreed system.
ancestry o groups o species can be deduced by

5.1 Evidence for evolution

ueig applicio

 Evolution occurs when heritable characteristics  Comparison o the pentadactyl limb o
o a species change. mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles
with dierent methods o locomotion.
 The ossil record provides evidence or
evolution.  Development o melanistic insects in
polluted areas.
 Selective breeding o domesticated
animals shows that artifcial selection ne of ciece
can cause evolution.
 Looking or patterns, trends and discrepancies:
 Evolution o homologous structures by adaptive there are common eatures in the bone
radiation explains similarities in structure when structure o vertebrate limbs despite their
there are dierences in unction. varied use.

 Populations o a species can gradually diverge
into separate species by evolution.

 Continuous variation across the geographical
range o related populations matches the
concept o gradual divergence.

241

5 Evolution and biodivErsity

 Figure 1 Fossils o dinosaurs show there were Evolution in summary
animals on Earth in the past that had diferent
characteristics rom those alive today Evolution occurs when heritable characteristics
of a species change.

There is strong evidence or characteristics o species changing over
time. Biologists call this process evolution. It lies at the heart o a
scientifc understanding o the natural world. An important distinction
should be drawn between acquired characteristics that develop during
the lietime o an individual and heritable characteristics that are
passed rom parent to ospring. Evolution only concerns heritable
characteristics.

The mechanism o evolution is now well understood  it is natural
selection. Despite the robustness o evidence or evolution by natural
selection, there is still widespread disbelie among some religious
groups. There are stronger objections to the concept that species can
evolve than to the logic o the mechanism that inevitably causes
evolution. It is thereore important to look at the evidence or
evolution.

 Figure 2 Many trilobite species evolved over Evidence from fossils
hundreds o millions o years but the group is
now totally extinct The fossil record provides evidence for evolution.

In the frst hal o the 1 9 th century, the sequence in which layers
or strata o rock were deposited was worked out and the geological
eras were named. It became obvious that the ossils ound in the
various layers were dierent  there was a sequence o ossils. In the
2 0th century, reliable methods o radioisotope dating revealed the
ages o the rock strata and o the ossils in them. There has been a
huge amount o research into ossils, which is the branch o science
called palaeontology. It has given us strong evidence that evolution
has occurred.

 The sequence in which ossils appear matches the sequence in which
they would be expected to evolve, with bacteria and simple algae
appearing frst, ungi and worms later and land vertebrates later still.
Among the vertebrates, bony fsh appeared about 420 million years
ago (mya) , amphibians 340 mya, reptiles 320 mya, birds 250 mya
and placental mammals 1 1 0 mya.

 The sequence also fts in with the ecology o the groups, with
plant ossils appearing beore animal, plants on land beore
animals on land, and plants suitable or insect pollination beore
insect pollinators.

 Many sequences o ossils are known, which link together existing
organisms with their likely ancestors. For example, horses, asses
and zebras, members o the genus Equus, are most closely related to
rhinoceroses and tapirs. An extensive sequence o ossils, extending
back over 60 million years, links them to Hyracotherium, an animal
very similar to a rhinoceros.

242


Click to View FlipBook Version