Angela Latham 2018 Annual Review

ANNUAL FACULTY REVIEW

Angela Latham
2018

Instructional Systems and Workforce Development
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

OFFICE: IED Bldg. Room 260
EMAIL: [email protected]

PHONE: 662.325.9260



Vitae

GRAPHIC DESIGNER/ [ ]A designer with six years of successful design
INSTRUCTOR entrepreneurial skills as well as five years’
experience as an instructor that can be
angelalathamdesigns.com utilized to expand the knowledge of the next
generation, specializing in effective use of
[email protected] information and design.
https://www.behance.net/amlathamd015
INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE
166 TYLER ROAD, STARKVILLE, MS 39759
662.425.2112 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Savannah, GA
Technical Illustrator Intern 2013 – 2013
EDUCATION
Provided support to the Technical Publications
Graduate:
Department through thoughtful design ideas.
Fullsail University, Orlando, FL
May 2018 • Redesigned Binders and Spines for Publications.
Master of Fine Arts in Media Design G.P.A • Complete Requests For Illustration.
3.83 • Participated in everyday illustration workflows; keyed in

Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 3D for Live Content and Review.
May 2011 • Created animations for the G650 in AMM, Aircraft
Master of Science in Architecture
G.P.A 3.84 Maintenance Manual, and IPC, Illustrated Parts
Catalog.
Undergraduate:
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Savannah, GA
Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS Technical Illustrator Intern 2012 – 2012
May 2013
Bachelor of Fine Arts in Graphic Design, Provided support to the Technical Publications
Graduated Magna Cum Laude
G.P.A 3.8 Department through thoughtful design ideas.

Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS • Redesigned PlaneBook Splashpages.
May 2007 • Created Thumbnail Library for G280 and G650.
Bachelor of Science in Interior Design, • Participated in everyday illustration workflows; keyed in
Graduated Magna Cum Laude
G.P.A 3.8 3D for Live Content and Review.
• Created animations for the G650 in AMM, Aircraft

Maintenance Manual, and IPC, Illustrated Parts
Catalog.

TVS Design Atlanta, GA
Intern Interior Designer 2007 – 2007

Served clients through thoughtful design solutions and

the creation of enlightened concepts, with a sensible

approach resulting in aesthetically pleasing interior

spaces.

• Worked on programming, space planning, furniture
layouts, information gathering and research to provide
an organized outcome.

• Delivered selections of finishes, furniture, and
equipment, generating functionality and safety.

• Developed drawing and sketch design concepts
and details through hand techniques and CADD
development, providing an outcome of quick concept
ideas to detail oriented illustrations.

TEACHING EXPERIENCE

TECHNICAL SKILLS Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS
Instructor 2013 – Current
Mac OS X Operating System Teaching the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts.
Windows Operating System
• Motivate students utilizing interactive learning
Computer Software: techniques through lecture, demonstration, visuals and
assigned research.
Microsoft Office Word
Microsoft Office Excel • Educate students on how to express a sense of
Microsoft Office PowerPoint personal identity and self-esteem through practical
Adobe Photoshop CC achievement in the expressive, communicative and
Adobe Illustrator CC functional modes of art, craft, and design.
Adobe InDesign CC
Adobe Dreamweaver CC • Instilled in students the aesthetic sensibilities and
Adobe Muse CC powers of critical appraisal, appreciation and
Adobe Premiere Pro CC evaluation.
Adobe After Effects CC
Adobe Bridge CC • Create in students the design qualities of imagination,
Adobe Audition CC creativity, originality and ingenuity, while imparting
Adobe Acrobat DC design development art forms from a variety of
Adobe Spark aspects.
Adobe Behance
AutoCAD • Established the Non-Artist Exhibition/Awards Ceremony
Autodesk Revit 2018 in order to honor students in the work that they have
XHTML/CSS put forth through each semester.
Camtasia 9
Teaching Photographic Communication.
Photography:
• Educate students on the techniques of photography
Digital Imaging and digital imaging as they relate to visual
Model: Cannon EOS DSLR communication in journalism, public relations, mass
media, and related fields.
GRAPHIC DESIGNER/
INSTRUCTOR • Instill in students the importance of communication
through imagery and displaying information
angelalathamdesigns.com effectively.

[email protected] PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
https://www.behance.net/amlathamd015
Angela Latham Designs, LLC. Starkville, MS
166 TYLER ROAD, STARKVILLE, MS 39759 Owner/Graphic Designer 2012 – Current
662.425.2112
Operation of a graphic design company that provides

identity, print and web design for a variety of clients.

• Consult clients on strategies to reach a particular
audience.

• Provide branding for self-identity of businesses in order
to stand out from the rest.

• Design visual concepts, to communicate ideas that
inspire, inform, and draw consumers.

• Execution, and presentation of different graphic
applications to include print and web.

• Meet the needs of clients by creatively customizing
each project in the spirit of excellence.

• Provide professional quality photography essentials
when necessary.

• Internship Supervisor for Instructional Technology
students with an emphasized in graphic design.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Charity Mission/Fairview FGBC Crawford, MS
Director of Marketing and Design 2012 – 2017

Provided stable branding and marketing for the church in

order to maintain a steady identity.

GRAPHIC DESIGNER/ • Produce creative design solutions and ideas in the
INSTRUCTOR spirit of excellence, through visual communication.

angelalathamdesigns.com • Instruct upcoming designers in industry-standard
design software.
[email protected]
https://www.behance.net/amlathamd015 • Oversee a staff of designers and editors to complete
tasks in an effective and timely manner.
166 TYLER ROAD, STARKVILLE, MS 39759
662.425.2112 • Create and maintain church website.

SOFT SKILLS • Maintain and update photography demands.

Oral Communication The Glory Magazine Crawford, MS
Written Communication Graphic Designer 2010 - 2012
Listening
Critical Thinking Generate a quality induced, clear and concise magazine
Flexibility and Adaptability
Time Management for the masses.
Work Well Under Pressure
Ability to Accept and Learn From Criticism • Mocking up design ideas and magazine layout.
Self-Confidence • Adjusting designs to fit the need of articles and adds.
Team Player • Use Software to execute the designs for the magazine.
Positive Attitude • Project schedules and meeting deadlines.
Strong Work Ethic • Working with others, such as editors, photographers,
Attention to Detail
and printers in order to complete the final product.
BUSINESS SKILLS
Assessment & Testing Services, MS State, MS
Project Management and Planning Graduate Assistant 2009 - 2011
Supervising and Leadership
Marketing Provide customer service to examinees and maintain a
Customer Service
Problem Solving conducive testing environment.
Organizationa
Financial Management • Welcome guests upon arrival and accept incoming
Networking phone calls.

• Supply office organizational needs
• Support staff and assist in the monthly scheduling of

staff, scheduled and proctored exams.
• Provide advertising and Outreach Events.
• Design concepts, execution and presentation of

different graphic applications.

TVS Design Atlanta, GA
Interior Designer 2007 – 2009

Served clients through thoughtful design solutions and

the creation of enlightened concepts, with a sensible

approach resulting in aesthetically pleasing interior

spaces.

• Worked on programming, space planning, furniture
layouts, information gathering and research as well
as selection of finishes, furniture, and equipment,
generating functionality and safety.

AWARDS PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

South Central Chapter 2006 • Developed renderings through Photoshop and
created presentation boards to include plans and
ASID Student Design Competition: FF&E for presentations to the client giving them a more
precise view of the concept.
• 1st runner-up in Rendering Category
• Developed furniture schedules in InDesign and Excel,
• Honorable Mention in Residential Category as well as furniture specifications in order to acquire a
detailed description for the clients view and a more
MSU Interior Design Competition: 2006 organized project plan.
• 1st Place in Creative Design Category,
• Honorable Mention in Residential Design • Developed drawing and sketching design concepts
and details through hand techniques and CADD
Category development, providing an outcome of quick
concept ideas to detail oriented illustrations.
Chairish the Future 2009
Judged by Vern Yip • Created floor plans, ceiling plans, furniture plans,
electrical and communication plans, sections
(TVS Chair Design-Group project): and elevations, as well as perspectives all used for
executing construction documents.
• “Best We Just Like It Award”
• Administered accurate punch lists, which
MSU 40th Annual Competition: 2012 consequently led to satisfactory results for the client.

• Most Outstanding Junior • Developed project budget, using Microsoft Excel,
producing an agreeable outcome.

• Worked with vendors to acquire information, products,
and samples, causing a respectful rapport for future.

• Chair Lydia Thompson Purchase Award

• Student Affairs Purchase Award Hair Affair Beauty Salon,

MSU 41st Annual Competition: Hair Designer – Owner/Operator Columbus, MS
• Honorable Mention-Fine Art 2007 – 2009
• Bill Dunlap Purchase Award 2013
Launched and maintained hair salon, managed the

financial systems, provided daily operations of business.

• Managed independent operators causing a profitable
effect for the business.

• Sustained stock inventory producing efficient workflow.
• Provided customer service to clients including

professional hair care and products resulting in repeat
business.

GRANTS

GRAPHIC DESIGNER/ Ottilie Schillig Grant 2018
INSTRUCTOR (PI): Special Teaching Project Award, Grants for
Instructional Innovation. $3,000 award funded.
angelalathamdesigns.com
No Child Left Behind Grant 2018
[email protected] (Co-PI): Integrating Global Academic Essentials: Common
https://www.behance.net/amlathamd015 Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology. Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $39,300 award funded. PI:
166 TYLER ROAD, STARKVILLE, MS 39759 Pamela Bracey. Co-PI: Sang Joon Lee.
662.425.2112
No Child Left Behind Grant 2017
(Co-PI): Integrating Global Academic Essentials: Common
Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology. Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $100,000 award funded.
PI: Pamela Bracey. Co-PI’s: Sang Joon Lee, Kun Huang,
Joanne Beriswill, and Kathleen Sherman-Morris.

GRAPHIC DESIGNER/ GRANTS
INSTRUCTOR
Ottilie Schillig Grant 2017
angelalathamdesigns.com (PI): Special Teaching Project Award, Grants for
Instructional Innovation. $3,000 award sought.
[email protected]
https://www.behance.net/amlathamd015 No Child Left Behind Grant 2016
(Co-PI): Integrating Global Academic Essentials: Common
166 TYLER ROAD, STARKVILLE, MS 39759 Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology. Mississippi
662.425.2112 Institutions of Higher Learning. $100,000 award. PI: Pamela
Bracey. Co-PI’s: Sang Joon Lee, Kun Huang, Joanne
GROUP EXHIBITIONS 2013 Beriswill, and Kathleen Sherman-Morris.
2012
Graphic Design Exhibition 2012 Ottilie Schillig Grant 2016
Mississippi State University, MS (PI): Special Teaching Project Award, Grants for
Instructional Innovation. $3,000 award sought.
Cotton District Arts Festival
Starkville, MS No Child Left Behind Grant 2015
(Co-PI): Integrating Global Academic Essentials: Common
Holiday Bazaar Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology. Mississippi
Starkville, MS Institutions of Higher Learning. $90,000 award. PI: Pamela
Bracey. Co-PI’s: Sang Joon Lee, Kun Huang, Joanne
Beriswill, and Kathleen Sherman-Morris.

MSU E-Center Startup Grant 2015
(PI): Funded by the Thad Cochran Endowment for
Entrepreneurship (TCEE), Key Capital Expenditure Grant.
$2,000 award.

SERVICE

University Level

MSU Global Academic Essentials Teacher Institute 2018

Member 2017

Assistant Director 2015 - 2016

PROFESSIONAL Member 2014
MEMBERSHIPS
Instructor
NAEA-National Art Education Association
2014 – Current Departmental Level
AIGA- American Institute of Graphic Arts
2011 – Current ISWD Appeals Committee 2016 - 2018
Honor Society Of Phi Kappa Phi Member
2011 – Current
ISWD Undergraduate Handbook Committee 2014 - 2018

Member

Digital Dawg Byte Technology Competition Committee
2014 - 2018
Snap-It Chair

Non-Artist Exhibition 2013 - 2018
Chair



Annual Faculty Review

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY

ANNUAL FACULTY REVIEW
(Format and Instruction, revised 8/2011)

For the Period January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018

Name: Angela Latham Title and Rank: Instructor

Department/Unit: Inst. Sys. and Workforce Dev. School/College/Division: College of Education

The annual review will consist of a combination of the assessment of how well the faculty
member met the annual goals for the review period and an assessment of the overall
accomplishments of the faculty member. The faculty member must first complete Item I, Parts
A-D and Item II, Goals and Objectives. The supervisor must then complete Item III, Parts A-D
and Item IV, Parts 1-2. Copies of the Review are to be filed in the office of the head/supervisor
and the dean or director. Item IV, Overall Assessments, must be reported to the appropriate
Vice President. The confidentiality of these papers must be maintained by all parties involved.
(See Faculty Handbook)

I. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES

(To be prepared by faculty member)

A. Teaching (See Faculty Handbook)

1. Evidence of quality of instruction (check items submitted)
The faculty member is expected to provide material describing his/her teaching
activities and documentation supporting effectiveness. This material could include
any of the following, or any other items deemed appropriate (check those included):
student evaluations , measures of student success , peer reviews ____,
department head review _____, recognition of outstanding teaching ,
developmental activities , self-evaluation of each course taught ,
instructional materials used: course outlines , test materials ,
other-rubrics .

Semester Course Delivery Evaluation

Spring 2018 TKI 2413-01: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Method Score
Spring 2018 TKI 2413-02: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.5
Spring 2018 TKI 2413-03: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.7
Spring 2018 TKI 2413-H04: Honors History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.9
Face to Face 4.8

Spring Overall Average: 4.725

Summer 2018 TKI 2413-02: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face N/A
Summer 2018 TKI 2413-51: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face N/A
Summer 2018 TKI 2413-52: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face N/A

Summer Overall Average: N/A

Fall 2018 TKI 2413-01: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.5
Fall 2018 TKI 2413-02: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts
Fall 2018 TKI 2413-03: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.8
Fall 2018 TKI 2413-05: History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts
Fall 2018 TKI 2413-H04: Honors History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Face to Face 4.9
Fall 2018 CO 3403-04 Photographic Communication
Face to Face 4.5

Face to Face 4.3

Face to Face 4.5

Fall Overall Average: 4.58

I taught three sections of the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts
and one section of Honors History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts in the
Spring. In the Summer I taught one section in the first five-week session and
two sections in the second five-week session of the History and
Appreciation of the Art-Crafts. I also taught a section of Photographic
Communication in the Fall. I received an overall average student
evaluation score of 4.725 in the Spring and 4.58 in the Fall.
All Items checked above are attached.


2. Academic Advisement
Undergraduate Advisees: _____ (number of students)
Master’s students: major professor ___; minor professor ___; comm. member ____
Specialist students: major professor ___; minor professor ___; comm. member ___
Doctoral students: major professor ___; minor professor ___; comm. member ____
Other:
Brief description of responsibilities:

I am not advising any students at this time.

3. Courses initiated/innovations instituted/other teaching contributions
(include new courses initiated, special lectures in other courses, generation of
teaching aids, activities supportive of teaching, student achievements, other)

The Fall semester instigated a new project, "Looking Through Glassworks to
Appreciate the World of Art," that I piloted with the History and
Appreciation of the Art-Crafts Honors class. This project was possible
through the 2018 Ottilie Schillig Grant, allowing The History and
Appreciation of the Art-Crafts class to expand into the glass realm of art
by nurturing the students with a repertoire of glass kiln-forming skills. The
pilot proved overall that the project was 80% successful with twenty out of
twenty-five projects displayed productively. With this outcome, a
workshop was attended to achieve a more efficient success rate.

This semester autonomy played a roll in all of the classes through
researching designs for specific projects. I compelled students to expand
in their own personal fondness of design through researching patterns and
stencils online to create their own creations leading to successful projects,
instead of restraining their ability to be creative through the works of
others. This provided for a more creative approach to personal
gratification.

I honor the students through an awards exhibition at the end of the Spring
and Fall semesters that showcase some of the best works from the
students in all of the History and Appreciation of the Art-Crafts sections,
which is called “The Non-Artist Exhibition/Awards Ceremony.” Students are
awarded certificates that commend them on their hard work and
dedication in the class, demonstrating the knowledge that has been
imparted through the skills learned. The awards are based off of people
who impacted the Arts and Crafts Movement Era as well as a Mississippi

Artist of the Ocean Springs area. Those awards include The William Morris
Award (Most Outstanding Artist), The Frank Lloyd Wright Award (The Most
Creative Artist), The Gustav Stickley Award (The Best Multi-Media Project),
The Newcomb Pottery Award (The Best Ceramic Art), The Walter Inglis
Anderson Award (The Best Stained Glass Mosaic), and The Best of Show
Award (The Viewer’s Choice), which is chosen by the spectators that visit
the show, and the newly chosen award is The John Ruskin Award (The Best
Video) which is awarded to student’s from the Honors section. I also
create a PowerPoint Presentation into the Non-Artist Exhibition, which
allows the viewers to witness what projects were worthy of awards and
why they were chosen.

I chose to hand make trophies to contribute to the The William Morris
Award (Most Outstanding Artist). These handmade trophies are made
with fused glass. Mr. Mize assisted in making the bases, which were a
wooden structure.

I was nominated for The Cindy Rose Teaching Award, which is a teaching
award that has had the most significant impact on an instructor’s students
during the last three-year period.

Images of exhibition are attached.

4. Other (including professional development and international activities)

Professional Development Date

Mandatory State Training: Active Shooter Situations: What April 2, 2018
Should Do?
Instructed GAETI Participants on Six Scene Sgraffito Project. July 16-20, 2018
Service Dawgs Day August 20,2018
Student Advisor Luncheon September 19, 2018
Getting Started with Canvas September 20, 2018
Served as Instructor of Snap It! for the Digital Dawg Byte October 30, 2018
Competition

Information attached

B. Research/creative activities (See Faculty Handbook)

1. Publications, performances or creative activities (note stage of development):
(For books, indicate date of publication and publisher; for articles, indicate refereed
journals; for art shows, indicate judged competition; for musical shows, attach
copies of programs; for reports, indicate those done for in-house use.)

2. Professional papers read; indicate whether invited, refereed, or volunteered.
Cite organization, date, and title:

3. Grants for research or study; submitted or awarded (cite source, title of project, role
[PI, etc.], $ amount, dates):

Latham, A, Co-PI. No Child Left Behind Grant-Integrating Global Academic Essentials:
Common Core, 21st Century Skills, and Technology, a grant funded by Mississippi
Institutions of Higher Learning. $39,900 award. S. J. Lee, Co-PI and P. Bracey, PI.

Latham, A, PI. Ottilie Schillig Grant 2018: Special Teaching Project Award, Grants for Instructional
Innovation. $3,000 award funded.

4. Intellectual property developed (patents, copyrights, licenses):

5. Other (including professional development and international activities):

Professional Development Date

Black Alumni Weekend-Volunteer February 16-18, 2018

Women’s History Month/Painting with a Colleague March 6, 2018

Culturally Responsive Teaching March 28, 2018

2018 Minority Faculty Staff Spring Social April 18, 2018

Habitat for Humanity: Maroon Edition Afternooon Build Day August 24, 2018
2018 Minority Faculty & Staff Welcome Back Social August 29, 2018
Women in Leadership October 4, 2018
2018 Minority Faculty and Staff Holiday Social November 28, 2018

Images are attached.

C. Service (See Faculty Handbook)

1. Public service, as lectures, short courses, workshops (dates, organizations and places):
(Off campus/on campus/extension projects)

2. Professional association service (offices held, journals edited, etc.):
(Indicate only associations in which you performed tasks)

3. University service (committees, administrative accomplishments, etc.):

ISWD Undergraduate Handbook Committee.
ISWD Appeals Committee.

4. School/departmental service/committees, etc.:

Service Date

Serve as Advisor to the Art Outreach Team February 23, 2018 – Current
Created Graphic Design Elements for GAETI 2018 July 10, 2018
To include: Logo Revision, Web Banners, Binder Inserts
and Flyer Design. August 31, 2018 – Current
Serve as Advisor to Friendly Reliable Individuals
Engaging N Diverse Societies (F.R.I.E.N.D.S.) October 5, 2018
Created Logo Design for F.R.I.E.N.D.S. October 20, 2018

Created T-Shirt Design for Digital Dawg Byte
Competition.

Images are attached.

5. Other (including professional development and international activities):

D. Relevant activities and accomplishments not reported elsewhere (Cite title, organization,
and brief description)

1. Awards and distinctions:

2. Memberships in learned and professional societies:

Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, Member
American Institute of Graphic Arts, Member
The National Art Education Association, member

3. Consulting activities:

Consult businesses through Angela Latham Designs as a Freelance
Graphic Designer about the branding and identity of their company.

4. Other:

II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

(To be prepared by faculty member)

Please list specific goals and objectives including areas in which improvement will be sought in the next
calendar year. These will be evaluated in the next review cycle.

1. Create an environment conducive to successful creativity in the classroom.
2. Host a Walk Through Gallery/Exhibition at the end of the Spring and Fall semesters

to honor students for their hard work.
3. Expand the new glass-molding project to include all sections.
4. Present at professional development conferences.
5. Design and create a variety of marketing tools for departmental enhancement

and visual communication.
6. Investigate (with the department) creating an online arts and crafts course.

On an annual basis, each faculty member and each head/supervisor will agree in writing to the faculty
member’s goals, objectives, responsibilities and expectations.

Agreement: ______________________________________________
Faculty Member

_______________________________________________
Head/Supervisor

III. EVALUATION BY HEAD/SUPERVISOR, DEAN OR DIRECTOR

The annual performance review is based upon the agreement concerning goals and objectives,
responsibilities, expectations, and achievements of the faculty. A faculty member would normally be
expected to have an assignment in teaching, research and service. Indicate assignments below:

A. Assignment: Teaching: _____%; Research: ______%; Service: _____% = 100%.
(for review period, see p. 1)

B. Goals and Objectives: Narrative assessment of how the faculty member performed in achieving
the previous year’s goals and objectives. State whether the faculty member’s achievements were
Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Excellent, or Superior per the rating standard
below. (Attach listing of goals from the previous year’s review.)

C. Accomplishments: Narrative assessment of how the faculty member performed in achieving the
previous year’s accomplishments. Rate the performance of the faculty member in each category
listed and state whether the faculty member’s achievements were Unsatisfactory, Needs
Improvement, Satisfactory, Excellent, or Superior per the rating standard below.

(I) a. Teaching (Undergraduate):
b. Teaching (Graduate):
c. Advising: not applicable

(II) Research/creative activities:
(III) Service (on campus/off campus):

D. Progress: If the faculty member is an assistant or associate professor, there must be a statement
about his or her progress toward tenure and/or promotion.

Unsatisfactory: Quality and quantity of work totally unsatisfactory. Immediate corrective action is
imperative.

Needs Improvement: Work is unsatisfactory in quantity and quality. Individual is not performing at
an adequate level. Corrective action required.

Satisfactory: Individual performing at "satisfactory" level. Tasks and goals are being accomplished
in a timely and competent manner.

Excellent: Quality and quantity of work consistently meritorious; goals regularly exceeded, highly
productive; individual recognized beyond the unit.

Superior: Preeminent distinction resulting from consistent outstanding meritorious
accomplishments.

N/A: Not Applicable

IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF PAST PERFORMANCE/
GOALS/OBJECTIVES/RESPONSIBILITIES/EXPECTATIONS

(See Faculty Handbook)

1. Overall Rating by Head/Supervisor, Dean or Director: Rate the overall performance and
achievement of the faculty member as Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Excellent, or
Superior per the rating standard listed in Item III.

Overall rating: Excellent.

2. Written Comments by Head/Supervisor, Dean or Director
To be completed following the annual review meeting with the faculty member, but made available
to the faculty member for review before signing by both parties. (Include specific strengths, needs
for improvement, responsibilities, and expectations for next year. Summary of progress toward
tenure and/or promotion, if applicable, will also be indicated here.)

Ms. Latham had a very good year as an instructor and in serving our students and department. She has
appropriate goals for 2018. She continues to improve her courses. She takes initiative to contribute to
the department priorities. I look forward to her continuing work on behalf of our students.

THE SIGNATURES LISTED BELOW* MUST BE OBTAINED

*Faculty Member:
I have met with the head/supervisor and acknowledge discussion of this appraisal.

_______________________________________________ ________________________
Faculty Member Signature Date

I agree with the annual review. See addenda [ ]
Faculty Signature: _______________________________________________

I disagree with the annual review. See addenda [ ]
Faculty Signature: _______________________________________________
________________________
Comments Attached: Date

Additional Information:

_______________________________________________
Faculty Member Signature

Appeal Requested: ________________________
Date
_______________________________________________
Faculty Member Signature

*Head/Supervisor: ________________________
Date
_______________________________________________
Signature

*Director or Dean: ________________________
Date
_______________________________________________
Signature

The faculty member will be provided with a copy of the final review, including all signatures and
comments/recommendations/assessments. The faculty member reserves the right to respond to
any comments and to have all of those responses included in the final version of the Faculty
Annual Review/Evaluation.

If disagreement is indicated, the faculty member must state the objection on the following page,
otherwise the page should be left blank. The disagreement statement should be completed before
the Dean signs above.

Disagreement Statement: To be completed by the faculty member if applicable.

If the faculty member disagrees with the evaluation of the head/supervisor, an explanation
of the disagreement should be detailed below by the faculty member. This page should be left blank
if there is agreement with the head/supervisors assessment.



Teaching

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP18
TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 18

Overall indicators 12345 av.=4.5
-+ dev.=0.7
Global Index av.=4.5
12345 dev.=0.7
1. 1 -+

Survey Results

1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 5.6% 27.8% 66.7% n=18
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6
n=18
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 av.=4.4
0% 5.6% 5.6% 27.8% 61.1% dev.=0.9
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.6
dev.=0.6
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 n=18
0% 0% 5.6% 33.3% 61.1% av.=4.9
dev.=0.3
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=17
av.=4.5
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.6
0% 0% 0% 11.1% 88.9% ab.=1
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.2
dev.=0.9
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 n=17
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 5.9% 35.3% 58.8% av.=4.4
dev.=0.8
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree ab.=1
n=13
12345 av.=4.3
0% 5.6% 16.7% 33.3% 44.4% dev.=0.9
ab.=5
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 5.9% 0% 47.1% 47.1%

1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345
0% 0% 23.1% 23.1% 53.8%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 1

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 23.1% 23.1% 53.8% n=13
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. av.=4.3
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.9
Strongly Disagree ab.=5
this subject. Strongly Disagree
12345

0% 0% 16.7% 33.3% 50% n=18
av.=4.3
Strongly Agree dev.=0.8

12345 n=18
0% 0% 5.6% 27.8% 66.7% av.=4.6
dev.=0.6
Strongly Agree

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Name of the instructor: Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Disagree Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.3
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Strongly Agree n=17 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
subject matter. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.2 md=4.0 dev.=0.9
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class Disagree
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly n=17 av.=4.4 md=4.0 dev.=0.8
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly n=13 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
Disagree
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Strongly n=13 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped Disagree
me learn in this class. Strongly n=18 av.=4.3 md=4.5 dev.=0.8
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in
lecture and/or assigned reading.

1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a
reasonable period of time.

1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other
students if they wanted to learn this subject.

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Profile Line for Indicators
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
(Name of the survey) Angela Latham
TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1. 1 - + av.=4.5 dev.=0.7

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP18
TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 18

Overall indicators 12345 av.=4.7
-+ dev.=0.5
Global Index av.=4.7
12345 dev.=0.5
1. 1 -+

Survey Results

1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 22.2% 77.8% n=18
av.=4.8
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.4
n=18
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 av.=4.6
0% 0% 0% 38.9% 61.1% dev.=0.5
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.8
dev.=0.4
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 n=18
0% 0% 0% 16.7% 83.3% av.=4.9
dev.=0.3
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=16
av.=4.3
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.8
0% 0% 0% 11.1% 88.9% n=17
av.=4.5
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
n=18
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 av.=4.5
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 18.8% 31.3% 50% dev.=0.6
n=14
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.7
dev.=0.5
12345 ab.=3
0% 0% 11.8% 29.4% 58.8%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 5.6% 38.9% 55.6%

1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345
0% 0% 0% 28.6% 71.4%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 1

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 0% 21.4% 78.6% n=14
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. av.=4.8
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.4
Strongly Disagree ab.=3
this subject. Strongly Disagree
12345

0% 0% 6.7% 33.3% 60% n=15
av.=4.5
Strongly Agree dev.=0.6
ab.=1

12345

0% 0% 0% 16.7% 83.3% n=18
av.=4.8
Strongly Agree dev.=0.4

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Name of the instructor: Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Disagree Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.3
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.3 md=4.5 dev.=0.8
subject matter. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=17 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class Disagree
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly n=18 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly n=14 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
Disagree
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Strongly n=14 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped Disagree
me learn in this class. Strongly n=15 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly n=18 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Disagree
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in
lecture and/or assigned reading.

1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a
reasonable period of time.

1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other
students if they wanted to learn this subject.

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Profile Line for Indicators
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
(Name of the survey) Angela Latham
TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1. 1 - + av.=4.7 dev.=0.5

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP18
TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 15

Overall indicators 12345 av.=4.9
-+ dev.=0.3
Global Index av.=4.9
12345 dev.=0.3
1. 1 -+

Survey Results

1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 6.7% 93.3% n=15
av.=4.9
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.3
n=15
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 av.=4.8
0% 0% 0% 20% 80% dev.=0.4
n=15
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=5
dev.=0
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 n=15
0% 0% 0% 0% 100% av.=5
dev.=0
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=15
av.=4.7
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.6
0% 0% 0% 0% 100% n=15
av.=4.8
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.4
n=14
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 av.=4.9
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 6.7% 13.3% 80% dev.=0.4
ab.=1
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n= 11
av.=4.8
12345 dev.=0.6
0% 0% 0% 20% 80% ab.=4

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 0% 14.3% 85.7%

1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345
0% 0% 9.1% 0% 90.9%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 1

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 9.1% 0% 90.9% n= 11
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. av.=4.8
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6
Strongly Disagree ab.=3
this subject. Strongly Disagree
12345

0% 0% 0% 0% 100% n=13
av.=5
Strongly Agree dev.=0
ab.=2

12345

0% 0% 0% 7.1% 92.9% n=14
av.=4.9
Strongly Agree dev.=0.3

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Name of the instructor: Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.3
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Disagree Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
subject matter. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=15 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class Disagree
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly n=14 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.4
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly n= 11 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Strongly n= 11 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped Disagree
me learn in this class. Strongly n=13 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly n=14 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.3
Disagree
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in
lecture and/or assigned reading.

1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a
reasonable period of time.

1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other
students if they wanted to learn this subject.

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Profile Line for Indicators
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
(Name of the survey) Angela Latham
TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1. 1 - + av.=4.9 dev.=0.3

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-03 Hi Appr Artcrafts

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
SP18
TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 19

Overall indicators 12345 av.=4.8
-+ dev.=0.5
Global Index av.=4.8
12345 dev.=0.5
1. 1 -+

Survey Results

1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 31.6% 68.4% n=19
av.=4.7
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5
n=19
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 av.=4.7
0% 0% 0% 31.6% 68.4% dev.=0.5
n=19
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.8
dev.=0.6
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 n=18
0% 0% 10.5% 0% 89.5% av.=4.9
dev.=0.2
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=19
av.=4.7
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.6
0% 0% 0% 5.6% 94.4% n=19
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.6
n=17
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 av.=4.8
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 5.3% 15.8% 78.9% dev.=0.6
n=12
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=5
dev.=0
12345 ab.=7
0% 0% 5.3% 31.6% 63.2%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 5.9% 11.8% 82.4%

1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345
0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 1

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% n=12
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. av.=5
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0
Strongly Disagree ab.=6
this subject. Strongly Disagree
12345

0% 0% 12.5% 0% 87.5% n=16
av.=4.8
Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
ab.=3

12345

0% 5.3% 0% 10.5% 84.2% n=19
av.=4.7
Strongly Agree dev.=0.7

12345

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Name of the instructor: Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=19 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=19 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Disagree Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Strongly Strongly Agree n=19 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.9 md=5.0 dev.=0.2
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Strongly Agree n=19 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
subject matter. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=19 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class Disagree
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly n=17 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly n=12 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
Disagree
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Strongly n=12 av.=5.0 md=5.0 dev.=0.0
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped Disagree
me learn in this class. Strongly n=16 av.=4.8 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly n=19 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.7
Disagree
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in
lecture and/or assigned reading.

1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a
reasonable period of time.

1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other
students if they wanted to learn this subject.

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 3

Subunit: Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course: Profile Line for Indicators
(Name of the survey)
Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Angela Latham
TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

1. 1 - + av.=4.8 dev.=0.5

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-H04 Honors Hi Appr Artcrafts

06/18/2018 Class Climate Evaluation Page 6

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
FA18
TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 18

Overall indicators 12345 av.=4.5
-+ dev.=0.9
Global Index av.=4.5
12345 dev.=0.9
1. 1 -+

Survey Results

1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 27.8% 72.2% n=18
av.=4.7
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.5
n=18
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 av.=4.4
0% 5.6% 11.1% 22.2% 61.1% dev.=0.9
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.5
dev.=0.8
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 n=18
0% 5.6% 0% 33.3% 61.1% av.=4.7
dev.=0.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=16
av.=4.5
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.9
0% 0% 5.6% 16.7% 77.8% ab.=1
n=18
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.4
dev.=1
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 n=18
questions or concerns. 0% 6.3% 6.3% 18.8% 68.8% av.=4.4
dev.=1
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=14
av.=4.3
12345 dev.=1.1
5.6% 0% 5.6% 22.2% 66.7% ab.=3

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 5.6% 0% 5.6% 22.2% 66.7%

1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345
7.1% 0% 7.1% 28.6% 57.1%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/24/2019 Class Climate Evaluation Page 1

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1.9) The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 7.1% 0% 7.1% 28.6% 57.1% n=14
1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a reasonable period of time. av.=4.3
1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=1.1
Strongly Disagree ab.=4
this subject. Strongly Disagree
12345

6.7% 0% 6.7% 26.7% 60% n=15
av.=4.3
Strongly Agree dev.=1.1
ab.=3

12345

5.6% 0% 0% 22.2% 72.2% n=18
av.=4.6
Strongly Agree dev.=1

12345

01/24/2019 Class Climate Evaluation Page 2

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Profile

Subunit: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
Name of the instructor: Angela Latham
Name of the course: TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. 1

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.5
class. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in Disagree Strongly Agree
an effective manner. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.8
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.7 md=5.0 dev.=0.6
Disagree Strongly Agree
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the Strongly Strongly Agree n=16 av.=4.5 md=5.0 dev.=0.9
subject matter. Disagree Strongly Agree
Strongly Strongly Agree n=18 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=1.0
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class Disagree
time to respond to my questions or concerns. Strongly n=18 av.=4.4 md=5.0 dev.=1.0
Disagree
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly n=14 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=1.1
Disagree
1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, Strongly n=14 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=1.1
web materials, and/or discussions, etc.) helped Disagree
me learn in this class. Strongly n=15 av.=4.3 md=5.0 dev.=1.1
Disagree
1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly n=18 av.=4.6 md=5.0 dev.=1.0
Disagree
1.9) The tests reflected material presented in
lecture and/or assigned reading.

1.10) Tests and/or assignments were graded within a
reasonable period of time.

1.11) I would recommend this instructor to other
students if they wanted to learn this subject.

01/24/2019 Class Climate Evaluation Page 3

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Subunit: Profile Line for Indicators
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course: Instr. Sys. Workforce Dev
(Name of the survey) Angela Latham
TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

1. 1 - + av.=4.5 dev.=0.9

01/24/2019 Class Climate Evaluation Page 4

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-01 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Comments Report

2. Please share additional comments about this course. Comments are only seen by the instructor of the course.

2.1)

01/24/2019 Class Climate Evaluation Page 5

Angela Latham, TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts

Angela Latham
FA18
TKI-2413-02 Hi Appr Artcrafts
No. of responses = 22

Overall indicators 12345 av.=4.8
-+ dev.=0.5
Global Index av.=4.8
12345 dev.=0.5
1. 1 -+

Survey Results

1. 1

Please respond to the following questions regarding your experience with the instructor in this course.

1.1) The instructor created high expectations for the class. 0% 0% 0% 18.2% 81.8% n=22
av.=4.8
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.4
n=22
1.2) The instructor conveyed the course content in an effective manner. 12345 av.=4.8
0% 0% 9.1% 4.5% 86.4% dev.=0.6
n=22
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=5
dev.=0.2
1.3) The instructor made the class interesting. 12345 n=22
0% 0% 0% 4.5% 95.5% av.=4.9
dev.=0.3
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree n=22
av.=4.6
1.4) The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 12345 dev.=0.7
0% 0% 0% 9.1% 90.9% n=22
av.=4.6
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree dev.=0.7
n=22
1.5) The instructor was accessible outside of class time to respond to my 12345 av.=4.8
questions or concerns. 0% 0% 9.1% 22.7% 68.2% dev.=0.5
n=16
1.6) I learned a great deal in this class. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree av.=4.9
dev.=0.3
12345 ab.=6
0% 0% 9.1% 18.2% 72.7%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1.7) The presentation of course content (lectures, web materials, and/or 12345
discussions, etc.) helped me learn in this class. 0% 0% 4.5% 9.1% 86.4%

1.8) The tests were fair. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345
0% 0% 0% 6.3% 93.8%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

12345

01/24/2019 Class Climate Evaluation Page 1