The Apollo Moon Hoax

formal rules of grammar. They state:

“The majority of the Statement Analysis techniques are
based on word definitions. Every word has a meaning.
When you combine this with the fact that people mean
exactly what they say, it then becomes possible to
determine if people are telling the truth“

They claim in tests that a success rate of 90% and above can
be achieved using trained investigators. I was interested to
see above that it refers to the English language, I am not
entirely sure if it is a method only used for the English
language, or whether it is used for other languages.

You may wonder why we are discussing this in a book about
the Moon? Perhaps you should watch this absorbing video
from Richplanet in three parts (App 14.04, 14.05 and 14.06).
Richplanet presenter Richard Hall describes how he
engaged Peter Hyatt to analyse the video of Neil Armstrong
being interviewed by Patrick Moore for the BBC “Sky at
Night” programme in 1970. For completeness I also include
the original uncut video which you may want to see (14.07).

Who is Peter Hyatt? Well in his field, he is a well known
“Statement Analyst” who has worked for numerous
companies and law enforcement agencies in the USA. He
examines Neil Armstrong's reply to each question and
provides a summary of his analysis commenting on the
words used by Armstrong. He is searching for “red flags” in
the way in which Armstrong associates himself with the
Apollo Moon landing.

And what do we find in this analysis by Peter Hyatt? His
findings are interesting. His summary statement is:

301

“Neil Armstrong does not linguistically connect himself to
the lunar landing. This is evident is his consistent
'distancing language' including intuitive pronouns and
passivity. What may have caused this?”

He goes on to offer four possible reasons for Neil
Armstrong's dissociation with the Moon landings.

1. Security Mandate
Armstrong may have been told not to tell anyone
what he saw, this is very doubtful as the Moon
landings are certainly no secret.

2. Baseline Language
Normal behaviour for a person, meaning Armstrong
always talks in the third person in everyday life.

3. Deception
The lack of commitment mimics deceptive language
and the lack of personal commitment.

4. Unknown Reason
Possibly Peter Hyatt is just covering himself with this
one.

Well, rather than me make any comment, I will just direct
you the notes attached to the video in RichPlanet as follows:

“It’s one small step for man, one giant lie for mankind. If
you cling to the notion that humans went anywhere near
the Moon in 1969 then pay attention to today’s show. New
analysis of the words of the most famous astronauts will
leave most people in no doubt they are both liars.

Attempts have been made to sideline moon hoax evidence.
Moon landing mythologists will (rightly) argue that if
photographs were filmed on Earth, that does not prove
they never went. But it’s far less reasonable to use this

302

argument about the astronauts own words, which reveal
that neither of the Apollo 11 'moonwalkers' make any
linguistic connection with having been on the lunar
surface.

Once this new analysis is realised with other well
established evidence, only those with severe delusional
psychosis will now believe that Armstrong went anywhere
near the Moon”.

The expert analysis indicates that Neil Armstrong was most
probably lying, which would infer that he never went to the
Moon. This is stark, and revealing information, and no
doubt welcomed by many of the Moon landing sceptics.
Equally, I can imagine that the pro-NASA group would not
accept this analysis, particularly as the study was instigated
by Richard Hall, himself a well known sceptic.

What For The Future
On 13 May 2019, NASA declared “We are going to the Moon
to stay” by 2024 (App 14.08 and 14.09). The US Vice
President Mike Pence and NASA's new Administrator Jim
Bridenstine state that NASA's intention is to “return” to the
Moon using a Moon Gateway. This is essentially a space
platform in lunar orbit from which astronauts would
descend to the lunar surface.

The Moon Gateway will be constructed in space from
components brought separately from Earth using a series of
launches. The project will utilise most of the components
developed for the previous Constellation and Orion projects
but will have the assistance of nine private sector companies
to help bring the necessary components for the Gateway.
The first mission is scheduled to launch this year (2019).

303

Now, the problem with any announcement from NASA is
that the goal keeps changing year on year. We have seen
announcements in the past which have declared the next
goal is back to the Moon, then that changed to Mars, then
we had landing astronauts on an asteroid or building a new
space station. It seems we are now eventually back to the
Moon a full 50 years since they supposedly first landed
there. Apparently, the difference this time is that they are
going to stay and presumably do something useful this time.
The target date prior to this announcement was 2028 but
this was brought forward for political reasons for fear that a
new Whitehouse Administration may change the goal once
again.

However, NASA have recently been seriously criticised by
the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) for
persistent delays and cost overruns (App 14.10). Their
report states:

“In November 2018, within one year of announcing an up
to 19-month delay for the three programs, the Space
Launch System (SLS) vehicle, the Orion spacecraft, and
supporting ground systems, NASA senior leaders
acknowledged the revised date of June 2020 is unlikely.
Any issues uncovered during planned integration and
testing may push the launch date as late as June 2021.
Moreover, while NASA acknowledges about $1 billion in
cost growth for the SLS program, it is understated. This is
because NASA shifted some planned SLS scope to future
missions but did not reduce the program's cost baseline
accordingly. When GAO reduced the baseline to account
for the reduced scope, the cost growth is about $1.8 billion”

The GAO have also classified NASA Projects as High Risk
Issues:

304

“Many of NASA's major projects have cost more or taken
longer to develop than planned. As stated in GAO’s 2017
High Risk Update, NASA has made progress since 2012 in
a number of key acquisition management areas, but it
faces significant challenges in some of its major projects.
These challenges are largely driven by the need to improve
the completeness and reliability of cost and schedule
estimating, estimating risks associated with the
development of major systems, and managing to
aggressive schedules. GAO designated NASA’s acquisition
management as High Risk in 1990 in view of NASA’s
history of persistent cost growth and schedule delays in the
majority of its major projects. Because NASA expects to
begin other large, complex projects in the next few years,
such as the Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway, it is essential
that the agency effectively manage its acquisition risk.”

It would appear that all is not well within NASA so perhaps
we should take any new announcements of goals with a
pinch of salt. We may know the answer in 2024, if
astronauts finally reach the lunar surface for the “first”
time.

Final Words
The anomalies in the Apollo record are there for all to see
providing you take the trouble to examine the evidence. We
have clearly shown in our examination of that evidence that
the Apollo Missions were faked and that the Apollo
astronauts never reached the Moon, nor did they ever leave
the Earth's magnetosphere.

No doubt the pro-NASA supporters will fervently continue
to defend the NASA story despite all the available evidence
to the contrary.

305

How they can view the unrealistic lunar landscapes as
presented by NASA with the ubiquitous “Kubrick
Horizontals” in almost every view and be satisfied that those
images were videoed or photographed on the Moon?

How they can view the clips of the astronauts jumping and
the sand falling faster completely against the laws of gravity
and convince themselves that they are viewing reality is
mind boggling (see App 12.37)? We are asked to accept that
it is possible to simultaneously have Earth and Moon gravity
at the same place and at the same time.

NASA: Apollo 16 Big Navy Jump Salute

306

How can the pro-NASA group look at the above photograph
in which the sand has already settled but the astronaut is
still suspended in air and not realise that they are being
fooled? I assume they must understand the laws of gravity
so they must know that the above is not possible. This is
basic schoolboy physics so there can be no excuse for the
pro-NASA fanboys and girls being blind to the deceit, other
than some vested interest in perpetuating the hoax.

How can they explain the fact that the Van Allen radiation
belts are not mentioned by Houston Control or the
astronauts on the Apollo 8 Mission which were the first
humans to leave Earth's protective magnetosphere? Now,
as we have seen the radiation danger appears to be NASA's
biggest problem in the Orion Project.

How can they listen to the sounds on the Apollo videos
taken on the atmosphere-less Moon and not question why
there are clear sounds being made in a vacuum?

It must also be hard to reconcile the fact that NASA
suddenly abandoned the Moon in 1972 and have not
ventured back in the intervening 50 years. NASA cited
reasons of cost but they have been happily spending billions
on other manned projects in low Earth orbit and other
unmanned projects into the solar system. Even so, they
appear to be as confused as ever concerning the danger of
radiation outside the Earth's magnetosphere.

The wilful loss of some of the most important data regarding
the Apollo Missions is troubling and gives one cause to
imagine that this was no accident but a determined attempt
to dispose of some crucial evidence which may have exposed
the deceit when under more scrupulous analysis. The loss of

307

the Apollo telemetry tapes in one outstanding example. The
telemetry tapes would have shown us the actual path
through the Van Allen radiation belts that the Apollo
Missions “supposedly” took to the Moon. The only telemetry
tapes NASA would have had were the simulated versions
which may have exposed the fakery so they had to be “lost”.

The tragedy of this whole sad story is the indoctrination of
our children with blatant falsehoods. The Apollo Moon
Landings are now part of the curriculum in many countries
and a whole generation of our children have been deceived
into believing that we had the technology to go to the Moon
50 years ago. We didn't, and we still do not have it today.

It is our responsibility to raise our children to learn to
recognise the true worth of technological achievement and
not to corrupt them with false claims of bogus
accomplishments, which as we have seen clearly never
happened.

If we think about the people who still believe that the Apollo
Missions actually landed on the Moon then we can visualise
two groups. The first group, in which I resided for almost 48
years, who simply believed what they saw on TV or read in
the newspapers but did not investigate the matter any
further. The second group comprise the pro-NASA devotees
who are for the most part individuals who are very
conversant with the evidence concerning the Apollo
Missions but for some reason chose to ignore the obvious
flaws in that evidence. One cannot rule out some
involvement of NASA in their disingenuous attitude, but one
day the truth will out.

It is so utterly frustrating for me that humanity finds itself
in this unenviable position. We are now faced with an

308

uncertain future in manned space exploration and to a
lesser extent in unmanned space exploration all because of
the Apollo fakery in 1960s by NASA-X. NASA now have the
new goal announced by President Trump of landing
astronauts on the Moon by 2024. The question we may have
to answer, is such a Moon landing technologically feasible
with our present technology?

It is evident that the Apollo fakery was probably a step
beyond what was technically feasible in the 1960s but the
real problem may be that it was also a step beyond what is
feasible now in 2019, particularly in regard to protection
against radiation beyond the Earth's paternal
magnetosphere. If this is indeed the case then there are two
possible outcomes to this dilemma for NASA to take. Either
they decide to go the honest route and the Moon landing
goals are further delayed until they can technologically catch
up, or for reasons again of national prestige they decide to
go ahead and fake it again.

Modern methods of Visual Effects (VXS) using Computer
Generated Images (CGI) and advances in camera technology
may prove too irresistible for any future fakers. Whereas the
Apollo fakery was weak in many places and could be
discerned by the determined researcher, it may well be that
modern film technology may produce an almost
undetectable “fake” reality. This report by the BBC on the
film “Gravity” gives some idea what is possible using
modern techniques of film production (App 14.11).

Could this mean that as far as space exploration is
concerned we are doomed to living in a future virtual reality
world in which real technological achievement is no longer
relevant?

309

Worryingly, we already have some signs that this may be
happening already. I mentioned the issues of fakery with the
International Space Station broadcasts in Chapter 5 (see
App 5.23) but there may well be more afoot with the NASA
Mars Rovers as explained in this report on Richplanet.TV
(App 14.12). There is also a downloadable paper on this
subject (App 14.13).

We already have a generation who have been deceived by
the Apollo Missions to the Moon, are we to live in a world in
which we falsely educate our children with these claims of
space exploration? This is a serious matter as we already
have the Apollo Moon Landings story firmly written into the
school curriculum in many countries.

I, for one, want my children to learn to investigate and seek
out the truth in all that they see and not have their minds
sullied by these false stories of mankind's great
achievements which are sadly mankind's greatest deceits.
NASA need to have the courage to stand up and admit what
happened back in the 1960s was a deceit undertaken at a
time of world tension for quite laudable reasons. If not, then
advancement in space exploration will be held back for
decades.

“Truth is truth to the end of reckoning”
William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure

310

Dedication to William Charles Kaysing
31 July 1922 – 21 April 2005

Children of my grandmother’s generation laughed at the
idea that typewriters would be obsolete in the future.
Children of my mother’s generation watched the Apollo 11
Moon landing on television and read news articles and
textbooks forecasting missions to Mars by the 1980s; space
shuttles replacing international aeroplanes; and computers
that once took up entire rooms would one day fit in a pocket.
Likewise, children of my generation had a computer in every
classroom and were of the mindset that come the late 1990s
or early 2000s we’d see a manned return to the Moon. Bases
on the Moon and missions to Mars would soon follow.
Those 80s kids would grow up into a world where everyone
has a portable computer in their pocket. Everybody today
has centuries worth of information and research, and
modern social interaction is literally at their fingertips. And
yet, there is still no “return” to the Moon.

With only one exception, I do not believe anyone from any
generation could have foreseen when Neil Armstrong
allegedly walked on the Moon in 1969 or even when Eugene
Cernan supposedly stepped off it for the last time in 1972
that nearly fifty years would go by without another manned
mission. Indeed, Eugene Cernan died still bearing the
dubious title of “Last Man on the Moon” and never lived to
see anyone take that title from him. We live in a world
where technology and human progress is flourishing at an
exponential rate. For every new electronic appliance,
motorcar, or new-fangled gizmo on the market, you be
assured that it will be superseded in less than a year. With
every new vehicle intended either sea, land or air, there will
soon be a new one to replace it and enter a new generation
of transportation. We live in a world where we have
permanent bases in Antarctica, where even tourists could

311

stay at a price. We’ve even had tourists live the dream and
spend time on the International Space Station. And with
Michael Melvil’s two flights aboard SpaceShipOne, a non-
governmental private mission flown by a man who did not
even graduate high school, space exploration is no longer
only reserved for government employees with college
degrees. Somehow, in nearly 50 years, a manned return
mission to the Moon has always remained an unobtainable
holy grail in the space industry. Who could possibly have
foreseen this? Nobody, except perhaps for one man. The
founding father of the Apollo moon landing conspiracy
theory.

No book on the Apollo Moon Hoax would be complete
without a reference to Bill Kaysing. As we approach the 50th
Anniversary of the supposed Apollo 11 Moon landing it is
fitting to recognise the great contribution that Bill made to
expose the deceit of NASA and Project Apollo. Whereas the
rest of the world gathered around their old tube televisions
to watch the grainy, black and white video feed from Apollo
11 trickle in, or rather flicker in, Bill Kaysing was not among
them. Despite working seven years as a service engineer,
analyst and technical writer at Rocketdyne, the company
that built the engines of the Saturn rockets, Bill Kaysing
simply could not generate the enthusiasm to watch the fruits
of his labour. He didn’t want to watch what he considered “a
phony performance”.

As an employee of Rocketdyne, Bill held Top Secret security
clearance and atomic energy commission clearance. Thus he
essentially held a VIP pass that allowed him access to the
company’s classified files and gave him an open door to
secret memos and documents. It was through this clearance
that Bill learned the dark secrets of the America’s space
industry: the U.S. Government was generally less than
truthful about their accidents and disasters. He witnessed

312

the testing and developments of engines, many of which
literally went up in smoke. Rather than be open and
transparent about these screw-ups, the higher ups would
directly instruct Kaysing’s technical publications
department to soften the seriousness of these disasters.
Downplay the problems the company was experiencing and
essentially exaggerate their technical capabilities. When
Kennedy made his promise to put man on the Moon by the
end of the decade, it was clear that NASA did not have the
technology to pull it off. As Bill’s daughter Wendy later
recalled him saying: “we had the technology to get to the
Moon, but not get back.” And as best NASA and their
contractors tried to make things sound rosy, the inability for
astronauts to survive the trip was further exemplified in
scientific papers that were appearing at the time. James Van
Allen published several papers warning of the dangers of
flying into the radiation belts surrounding the Earth. That
the shielding astronauts needed was beyond the engineering
practicability of the available technology, and without which
humans should instead take off through the radiation free
zones over the poles. The Soviets were also aware of the
dangers. As the President Keldysh of the Soviet Academy of
Sciences would later tell Sir Bernard Lovell in 1963, they
were postponing manned moon missions indefinitely due to
the dangers of solar flares that would quickly kill their
cosmonauts.

Beginning in 1961, Kaysing learned that NASA and the
Defence Intelligence Agency had assembled a program
called A.S.P. (Apollo Simulation Project). He became privy
to various proposals that these agencies had considered to
simulate flights to the Moon and purport them to be the real
thing. Ultimately not wanting any part of it, and no longer
wishing to continue a career of publishing company
propaganda, Bill Kaysing retired from Rocketdyne. Rather
than coming out of the closet then and there of NASA’s

313

shady past, he instead buried this knowledge in the back of
his mind and used his skills as a writer to pursue a non-
space related projects. He wrote books about motorcycle
safety, eating well for cheap, and purchasing land on a
budget. Over the years, Bill and his family had turned their
house boat into a sanctuary for the homeless. In fact, he was
known to find complete strangers living on the streets and
bring them home! There he offered them food and
accommodation until they could get back on their feet.

One of these homeless men whom Kaysing had found was a
veteran of the Vietnam War by the name of John Grant.
Troubled by his conscience, Grant had turned to heroin to
ease his pain and suppress his inner demons. One night on
the houseboat, he and Bill were having a conversation. He
said, “Bill, I was duped into believing that what I did in
Vietnam was patriotic and heroic. But that’s bullshit! I was
sent to Vietnam and killed innocent people for no good
reason. Why don’t you blow the whistle on this rotten and
corrupt government? Say something outrageous like, We
Never Went to the Moon!”

Grant of course was suggesting that Kaysing do a satirical
project out of spite. But Kaysing ultimately decided to do a
serious project. He had been sitting on his inside knowledge
concerning the Apollo Simulation Project for years. And
shortly after this little exchange with Grant, Kaysing learned
of the sad story of Thomas Ronald Baron. The safety
inspector from North American Aviation who was extremely
critical of NASA and NAA during the construction of Apollo
1. How he had prepared a 500 page document detailing
safety violations and malpractice that went unchecked and
unfixed. How Baron testified before congress after the fire
and then was found dead at a railroad crossing a few days
later and his report went missing. Learning of Baron and the

314

motivation by Grant, together, ultimately became the
catalyst that led Bill on his journey to find the truth.

Bill penned the first writings in 1974 and pondered over
whether he should publish his expose of what he believed
was one of the greatest acts of deceit in modern times.
Finally, in 1976 he self-published his book “We Never Went
to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle”. This
original publication mostly consisted of a detailed exposé of
what was planned with the Apollo Simulation Project. Some
of which he had learned himself during his time at
Rocketdyne, others he had gathered here and there from
various witnesses or sources he had managed to track down.
The book was rather light on photographic and technical
evidence concerning the Apollo record itself. Such concerns
focused mainly on the lack of a blast crater under the LM,
lack of star photography and objects illuminated on the
shaded side. That original book was even undecided on
whether the Apollo 1 fire was accidental, instead focusing
more on Baron and his lost report. At the time of his writing,
Kaysing wondered how NASA could possibly have got to the
Moon when they couldn’t even properly manage relatively
simple problems on the ground. For many readers it opened
their eyes to something being wrong with the Apollo record
and got a lot of people thinking.

Later in 1981, Kaysing greatly expanded upon this original
work with the Desert Publication edition. By this stage a lot
of developments had happened and Kaysing had learned of
various methods to pull off the Apollo hoax. He had learned
NASA could simulate micro-meteoroid impacts on Moon
rocks with two-stage projectile systems. He proposed using
geological data from Surveyor to figure out how to go about
faking Moon rocks. By this stage he had become very privy
all the various techniques film-makers use in motion
pictures and how they could be used to fake the Apollo

315

footage. His new book had even republished transcripts of
Baron’s testimony and pages from his surviving 51 page
report. Kaysing had also learned of Gus Grissom’s lemon,
his disenchantment with the Apollo program, and witnesses
who claimed minutes – not seconds – went by from the first
mention of fire to when the flames filled the window. In
light of these new findings, by now Kaysing was convinced
the deaths of the Apollo 1 crew were not an accident either.
And of course, in the time between the two editions’
publishing, Kaysing had managed to find a lot more
anomalies in photographs.

The original edition has been republished by many sources
before and since the Desert Publications issue was released.
This expanded edition has surprisingly become harder to
find. To his original books that started it all, Bill is now
rightly regarded as the initiator of the Moon hoax
movement. His work has inspired several generations of
Apollo hoax investigators. Ralph René, a former member of
Mensa and consultant to NASA, read Kaysing’s book and
ultimately filled in many of the blanks with his much more
comprehensive book, NASA Mooned America! Primarily
concerning the lack of radiation protection, problems with
protecting astronauts from the temperatures on the Moon,
and established a lot of foul play concerning Apollo 1. British
photographer David Percy found many anomalies in the
Apollo program’s photographic record and published the
book Dark Moon, these discoveries he shared with Kaysing
which he then used to fine tune his thesis. Journalists and
filmmakers Jim Collier, Aron Ranen and Bart Sibrel all
respectively and independently produced their own
documentaries after learning of Kaysing and or René’s
books. And of course, there was I, who learned of Bill
Kaysing during my teenage years. Like many children of my
generation, I grew up of the mindset that we’d be returning
to the Moon and establishing bases there by the beginning

316

of the new millennium. That didn’t happen. And the reason
why it didn’t happen became clear after learning of the
Apollo hoax movement. The reason why there has not been
a ‘return’ to the Moon in nearly fifty years and why the
‘return’ date perpetually gets pushed back into the future is
because the technology to shield astronauts from the
radiation encountered on a flight to the Moon wasn’t solved
in 1969 and still has not been solved today.

Bill Kaysing died in 2005. His death was mercilessly trolled
by defenders of the Apollo program. It was never any
surprise that any controversial stance would be met with
backlash. But the webmasters of these pro-Apollo sites and
blogs were not simply writing “Kaysing was wrong because
of this and that.” Instead their online content was
propaganda and defamation in the first degree. The internet
had essentially given birth to a whole slew of websites
attempting to discredit Kaysing by any means necessary,
even if it meant making it up. The false claims these
propagandists pulled out of the air ranged from: insinuating
that Kaysing left Rocketdyne before they worked on Apollo;
to falsely alleging that he thought ‘all space travel was
impossible!’ Such claims were both disputed by Kaysing’s
daughter and disproven by anyone who has taken the time
to read his book. I was so angered by these propagandists
trolling Kaysing’s death and clouding his legacy with
unsubstantiated character assassination that I took it upon
myself to take a stand against them. In doing so I ultimately
followed in his footsteps as The Grandson of the Apollo
Hoax Theory.

In more recent years, a new type of propaganda has
emerged. Propaganda that doesn’t create the appearance of
refuting a claim, but rather making said claim appear more
extreme by associating it with indisputable nonsense. I am
of course talking about the proponents who erroneously

317

claim the Earth is flat and that all space travel and space
itself is fake! God only knows where this nonsense came
from, but the internet in recent years has become infested
with ridiculous videos and websites promoting Flat Earth
nonsense. Such proponents have often leached off the work
of Bill Kaysing and attempted to twist it into something to
support their nonsense. I’ve lost count of how many times
I’ve gone onto YouTube and found stolen interviews clips of
Kaysing uploaded with “FLAT EARTH” misleadingly added
to the title or description. If this was just one or two idiots
on the internet, we could easily dismiss them as a mere
tolerable annoyance. But this Flat Earth nonsense has
spread so far that it has got to the point that even the
webmaster of the Bill Kaysing Tribute Website has fallen for
it. The webmaster (who shall remain nameless) who created
a digital shrine we once relied on to honour Bill Kaysing’s
legacy, now defecates on that legacy by posting articles
falsely insinuating Kaysing claimed “no rocket can go faster
than 5km/s, therefore no rocket can reach orbital speed of
8km/s.” Of course, there is no such claim by Bill Kaysing.
This traitor has put so many words in Kaysing’s mouth I’ve
found myself wondering if the man ever genuinely mourned
Bill Kaysing or created his website with the intention of
dropping this Flat Earth propaganda on Kaysing’s legacy
after significant web traffic had come to it.

As we approach fifty years since the alleged landing on the
Moon, it is important to shed Kaysing’s legacy from the
propaganda that has been flung in his direction. We need to
remember the real Bill Kaysing. He was somebody who went
out of his way to help his fellow man. A loving father and
husband who preached healthy eating and living well on a
budget. And perhaps most memorably, he was a former
Rocketdyne employee who ultimately made the bold and
thankless task to challenge the mighty and well regarded
organisation that NASA was perceived to be at the time. One

318

solitary voice of disbelief at a time when the world was
captivated by this ‘greatest achievement of mankind’.

He had the evidence and he went where it led him. He
wanted to share with the world what he knew, ridicule be
damned. It was an act of courage from which he would have
little to gain personally except knowing he had exposed the
truth. This was at a time when there was no internet, no vast
compendium of documents nor wealth of photographs or
videos that could be used as evidence of fakery. Back when
evidence was not so easily obtainable for the average citizen.
But from that one publication Kaysing made, he had started
a revolution. Pointed generations of investigators in the
direction of where to look and what to look for. Libraries,
newspaper archives, any place where they could analyse
photos and documentation concerning the Apollo program.

For forty-five years Kaysing’s work and writings have
inspired generations of Apollo investigators and set the
wheels in motion. As we pass the baton onto the next
generation of researchers who will doubtlessly scrutinize the
official Apollo record over the next fifty years, it is important
to take the time to remember Bill Kaysing for all his work
and contribution into enlightening his readers on this fraud.
For his preaching of motorcycle safety and healthy eating on
a budget. For his sheltering of homeless cats and people.
And ultimately, for trying to make the world a better place.

To Bill Kaysing.
Love. Joy. Action!

Jarrah White
The Grandson of the Apollo Hoax Theory

319