Page 1
✓ Platform D75 ✓ Platform D95
✓ 180g filling ✓ 240g filling
✓ Topper with a central hole ✓ PET Topper
✓ Plastic spoon-straw ✓ Comforlid
✓ Pull-tab lid
Topper in
Fantasia’s dark
blue color
Mat/glossy
finishing
Transparent PP cup,
space to expose new shape,
bi-layer format transparent execution
Key challenge: transparent cups
detection in destacking station
POLYOLEFIN
+ - + -
1. Sealing material: alu 1. Cost 1. Cheaper than pull-tab 1. Sealing material: alu +
2. Visible drinking hole 2. Time of development 2. Shorter time of plastic membrane
before opening (exceeds project timming) development 2. Unvisible drinking hole
before opening
Comforlids assesment results during all the IT's
100 1 0,8 11 ▪ 4 IT’s done
6,5
98 89 ▪ Best technical parameters
96 99,2 found (time, temperature and
94 93,5 pressure)
92
▪ Significant improvement
98,9 achieved
90 ▪ ≤ 1% in Zone C confirmed
88 (IT3, IT4)
86
84 Test 3 Test 2 Test 1
82
Test 4
Zona A [%] Zona C [%]
Packaging grid for Comforlids
assesment was created based
on alingment, together with:
✓ the factory,
✓QiD
✓QM
✓and R&I Pack Departments.
Objectives:
1. To confirm the quality standard for Comforlids at ≤ 1% in Zone C
2. To chceck alternative option from supplier- new specification
3. To chceck and compare the results for standard alu lid
Zone A NEW spec D1 Current spec D1 IT3 Results STANDARD ALU
Zone B % % % D0 D1
Zone C
93,1 98,9 99,2 96,7 95,1
0,0 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0
6,9 1,0 0,8 3,3 4,9
% result of defects on individual nests- D0 % result of defects on individual nests- D1
16%
16% 16% Nest 4 Nest 9 15% Nest 11
15% Nest 4 Nest 9 Nest 11
14% 14%
14% 14%
13%
Nest 8 12% Nest 8
12% 12% 11%
10% 10% 10%
10% 10%
9%
8% 8% 8% 8%
8% 8%
7% 7%
6% 6% 5% 6% 5%
5% 5%
4% 4% 4% 4%
4%
3%
2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2%
1% 1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3 Nest 4 Nest 5 Nest 6 Nest 7 Nest 8 Nest 9 Nest 10 Nest 11 Nest 12 Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3 Nest 4 Nest 5 Nest 6 Nest 7 Nest 8 Nest 9 Nest 10 Nest 11 Nest 12
Hair Broken membrane Hair Broken membrane
Cooling in the fridge Cooling by the temperature of product Cooling spray
5 min 10min 1min 3min 5min immediately after
cooling
Zone A: 93,3 % Zone A: 96,7 % Zone A: 91,7 % Zone A: 99,0 % Zone A: 100 % Zone A: 100 %
Zone B: 0% Zone B: 0% Zone B: 0% Zone B: 1% Zone B: 0% Zone B: 0%
Zone C: 6,7% Zone C: 3,3% Zone C: 8,3% Zone C: 0% Zone C: 0 % Zone C: 0 %
✓ 4 IT’s for PACK done to improve opening of Comforlids Significant improvement
achieved
✓ After 4th IT current comoflid spec showed the best openability Good quality level resuls
results in D0 and D1, compared to new comforlid spec and standard alu lids proven
✓ Resuls for Comforlid D1 do not extend 1,0% in Zone C The standard is preserved
✓ The observation was repeated: the results in D0 for Zone C are twice as high Proposition of derogation
as in D1 (evaluation in D0 without cooling down) for D0 quality assesment
✓ Defects observed on lids come from the same machine nests: 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 Technical involvement
needed
✓ Cooling method in D0: reco to go with cooling by the temperature Effective cooling method
of the product for 3 minutes
Action
Derogation conditions: needed
1. Observation of lids in production and data collection after evaluation of openability
2. Involvement in correction on the line (most defects come from nests 4, 6, 8, 9, 11)
☺
Lids with unproper laser
scoring were delivered for
1st production
TEAM
Defect ratio ~ 23 lids/1000
Actions:
☺ 1. Root cause analysis with supplier & tracebility of defected lids
2. Checking all cups on pallets and segregation in warehouse
3. Re-control of lids Quality by supplier