The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.
Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by macwac.new, 2020-03-11 07:24:32

JOBS newsletter - Issue #5

February 2020

Page 1





✓ Platform D75 ✓ Platform D95
✓ 180g filling ✓ 240g filling
✓ Topper with a central hole ✓ PET Topper
✓ Plastic spoon-straw ✓ Comforlid
✓ Pull-tab lid

Topper in
Fantasia’s dark

blue color

Mat/glossy
finishing

Transparent PP cup,
space to expose new shape,
bi-layer format transparent execution

Key challenge: transparent cups
detection in destacking station

POLYOLEFIN

+ - + -

1. Sealing material: alu 1. Cost 1. Cheaper than pull-tab 1. Sealing material: alu +
2. Visible drinking hole 2. Time of development 2. Shorter time of plastic membrane
before opening (exceeds project timming) development 2. Unvisible drinking hole
before opening



Comforlids assesment results during all the IT's

100 1 0,8 11 ▪ 4 IT’s done
6,5
98 89 ▪ Best technical parameters
96 99,2 found (time, temperature and
94 93,5 pressure)
92
▪ Significant improvement
98,9 achieved

90 ▪ ≤ 1% in Zone C confirmed
88 (IT3, IT4)
86
84 Test 3 Test 2 Test 1
82

Test 4

Zona A [%] Zona C [%]



Packaging grid for Comforlids
assesment was created based
on alingment, together with:

✓ the factory,

✓QiD

✓QM

✓and R&I Pack Departments.

Objectives:
1. To confirm the quality standard for Comforlids at ≤ 1% in Zone C
2. To chceck alternative option from supplier- new specification
3. To chceck and compare the results for standard alu lid

Zone A NEW spec D1 Current spec D1 IT3 Results STANDARD ALU
Zone B % % % D0 D1
Zone C
93,1 98,9 99,2 96,7 95,1
0,0 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0
6,9 1,0 0,8 3,3 4,9

% result of defects on individual nests- D0 % result of defects on individual nests- D1

16%

16% 16% Nest 4 Nest 9 15% Nest 11

15% Nest 4 Nest 9 Nest 11

14% 14%

14% 14%
13%

Nest 8 12% Nest 8

12% 12% 11%

10% 10% 10%
10% 10%

9%

8% 8% 8% 8%

8% 8%
7% 7%

6% 6% 5% 6% 5%
5% 5%

4% 4% 4% 4%
4%

3%

2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2%
1% 1%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0%

Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3 Nest 4 Nest 5 Nest 6 Nest 7 Nest 8 Nest 9 Nest 10 Nest 11 Nest 12 Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3 Nest 4 Nest 5 Nest 6 Nest 7 Nest 8 Nest 9 Nest 10 Nest 11 Nest 12

Hair Broken membrane Hair Broken membrane

Cooling in the fridge Cooling by the temperature of product Cooling spray

5 min 10min 1min 3min 5min immediately after
cooling

Zone A: 93,3 % Zone A: 96,7 % Zone A: 91,7 % Zone A: 99,0 % Zone A: 100 % Zone A: 100 %
Zone B: 0% Zone B: 0% Zone B: 0% Zone B: 1% Zone B: 0% Zone B: 0%
Zone C: 6,7% Zone C: 3,3% Zone C: 8,3% Zone C: 0% Zone C: 0 % Zone C: 0 %

✓ 4 IT’s for PACK done to improve opening of Comforlids Significant improvement
achieved
✓ After 4th IT current comoflid spec showed the best openability Good quality level resuls
results in D0 and D1, compared to new comforlid spec and standard alu lids proven
✓ Resuls for Comforlid D1 do not extend 1,0% in Zone C The standard is preserved
✓ The observation was repeated: the results in D0 for Zone C are twice as high Proposition of derogation
as in D1 (evaluation in D0 without cooling down) for D0 quality assesment

✓ Defects observed on lids come from the same machine nests: 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 Technical involvement
needed
✓ Cooling method in D0: reco to go with cooling by the temperature Effective cooling method
of the product for 3 minutes
Action
Derogation conditions: needed
1. Observation of lids in production and data collection after evaluation of openability
2. Involvement in correction on the line (most defects come from nests 4, 6, 8, 9, 11)



Lids with unproper laser
scoring were delivered for

1st production

TEAM

Defect ratio ~ 23 lids/1000

Actions:

☺ 1. Root cause analysis with supplier & tracebility of defected lids
2. Checking all cups on pallets and segregation in warehouse

3. Re-control of lids Quality by supplier


Click to View FlipBook Version