CV19News - The Covid Report

Brian Hooker's research in the Translational Neurodegeneration Journal provides the most recent
epidemiological evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24
months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.

Whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, confirmed that "the CDC knew about the relationship between the
age of first MMR vaccine and autism incidence in African-American boys as early as 2003 but chose to
cover it up." He remarked "we've missed ten years of research because the CDC is so paralyzed right now
by anything related to autism. They're not doing what they should be doing because they're afraid to look
for things that might be associated." He alleges criminal wrongdoing by his supervisors, and he expressed
deep regret about his role in helping the CDC hide data.

Measles Virus Does Not Exist

German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could provide scientific
evidence that the measles virus existed. He had initially been ordered to pay up in court after Doctor David
Barden’s attempted to claim the prize after providing the biologist with a study that had been published in
a medical journal. At that time, a Judge in the regional court in Ravensburg, South Germany, ruled in the
favor of Dr. Barden’s in a controversial decision claiming the criteria for evidence had been met.

The First Civil Senate of the BGH confirmed a judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) in
February 2016. The sum of 100,000 euros which was offered as a reward for scientific proof of the
existence of the alleged measles virus did have to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also was ordered to
bear all procedural costs.

Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts,
including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding
court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial,
contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.

In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been
introduced. Two recognized laboratories, including the world's largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived
at exactly the same results independently. The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the
measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They
have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.

Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were
mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to
this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all
thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.

The authors of the six publications and all other persons involved, did not realize the error because they
violated the fundamental scientific duty, which is the need to work "lege artis", i.e. in accordance with
internationally defined rules and best practice of science. They did not carry out any control experiments.
Control experiments would have protected authors and mankind from this momentous error. This error
became the basis of belief in the existence of any disease-causing viruses. The expert appointed by the
court, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski, answering to the relevant question by the court, as per page 7 of the protocol
explicitly confirmed that the authors did not conduct any control experiments.

The OLG Stuttgart overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and
referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications. The
plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court. As reason he stated his
subjective, yet factually false perception of the trial sequence at the court in Stuttgart, and the assertion

Copyright ©2021 P a g e | 251 CovidReport.CV19News.ca

that our naming of facts about measles posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff's position was
rejected by the Supreme Court in plain words. Thus, the Supreme Court confirmed the Judgment of the
OLG Stuttgart from February 16, 2016.

The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of "measles
virus." Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by
scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the
measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international
statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of
vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of
their legal basis.

Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference
Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important
fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of
vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly
trigger autism.

Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the "measles virus" contains typical cell's natural components
(ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole "whole
measles virus", this vaccine contains cell's own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles
causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The
court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to
ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.

In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious
diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create
tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on
measles virus, however, refuses to hand over or publish the results.

Sources:
lrbw.juris.de
anonhq.com
wissenschafftplus.de

Facts About Viruses That Will Shock You
Medical Journal Verifies That Vaccinated Populations Are Transmitting Disease Without Symptoms

Copyright ©2021 P a g e | 252 CovidReport.CV19News.ca

DR. STEFAN LANKA DEBUNKS PICTURES OF
“ISOLATED VIRUSES”

https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/dr-stefan-lanka-debunks-pictures-of-isolated-viruses

March 2, 2002 by Vaccination Information Network

Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally mostly known as an “AIDS dissident”
(and maybe “gentechnology dissident”) who has been questioning the very existence of “HIV” since 1994.
In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant)
viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proof of their existence. Actually, Dr. Lanka already stated three
years ago, in the almost “legendary” Zenger´s interview: (http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/mcinterviewsl.htm)

“So, for a long time I studied virology, from the end to the beginning, from the beginning to the end, to be
absolutely sure that there was no such thing as HIV. And it was easy for me to be sure about this because I
realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses – as well as other
viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous – in fact do not exist at all.”

So, he thoroughly read the literature on those “other viruses” again, and after he could still not find any
paper which would provide the evidence, he encouraged people not to BELIEVE him but to ask the
institutes and authorities themselves. This has actually eventuated, mostly initiated by mothers. The
responses were revealing. In September 2001 the German book “Impfen – Völkermord im dritten
Jahrtausend?” (Vaccination – Genocide in the third millennium?) by Stefan Lanka and Karl Krafeld was
published in which they state that there is still no proof of any (medically relevant) virus.

This movement (klein-klein-aktion ~ many little actions/steps) has a German website: www.klein-klein-
aktion.de which I have taken (and translated) all the following texts from.

Copyright ©2021 P a g e | 253 CovidReport.CV19News.ca

For almost one year we have been asking authorities, politicians, and medical institutes for the scientific
evidence for the existence of such viruses that are said to cause disease and therefore require
“immunization”. After almost one year we have not received even one concrete answer which provides
evidence for the existence of those “vaccine-preventable viruses”. The conclusion is inevitable that our
children are still vaccinated on the basis of scientific standards of the 18th and 19th century. In the 19th
century Robert Koch demanded in his generally accepted postulates evidence of the virus in order to prove
infection; at Koch´s time this evidence couldn´t be achieved directly by visualization and characterization
of the viruses, because adequate technology wasn´t available at that time. Methods of modern medicine
have profoundly changed over the past 60 years, in particular by the invention of the electron microscope,
yet all these viruses we get immunized against have still never been re-examined using this technology.

We showed to Dr. Lanka a number of
images and explanations we were pointed
to and that were said to show – respectively
describe (characterize) viruses. Here are his
summarizing comments:

“All these photos have in common that they,
respectively the authors, can´t claim that
they represent a virus, as long as they do
not also provide the original publications
which describe how and what from the virus
has been isolated. Such original
publications are cited nowhere.

Indeed, in the entire scientific medical
literature there´s not even one publication,
where the fulfillment of Koch´s first
postulate is even claimed for such viruses.
This means that there is no proof that the
viruses held responsible for these diseases
have been isolated from humans afflicted
by them. Nevertheless, this is precisely
what they publicly claim.

Now, regarding the photos submitted:

1. Many of the photos are colored. This is proof enough, that they are the (art)work of designers, because
electron microscopic photos always appear in black and white.

2. The images of the so-called HIV-, measles (Masern)- and smallpox (Pocken) viruses clearly show, as the
image descriptions partly already indicate, that these are cells wherein the viruses can allegedly be found.
Thus, nothing has been isolated. The photos actually show cells and typical endogenous particles in them.
These structures are well known and serve the intra- and inter-cellular transport. Unlike viruses of the
same kind – which are consistently the same size and same shape – they differ in size and shape and
therefore can´t have been isolated.

3. In the case of the influenza- herpes-, vaccinia-, polio-, adeno- and ebola-viruses each photo shows only a
single particle; nobody claims that they´re isolated particles, let alone particles that have been isolated
from humans.

Copyright ©2021 P a g e | 254 CovidReport.CV19News.ca

These particles are partially the cellular particles mentioned above (#2) resp. typical artifacts which
means: structures that accrue after inappropriate fixing and drying of the probes, while being prepared for
the electron microscope.

4. The “isolated” polio viruses are artificial particles, generated by suction of an indifferent mass through a
very fine filter into a vacuum. Its structure (no characteristic structures) differ clearly from the ones of the
“viruses” in the cells. Here the information is essential that a biochemical characterization of those
“isolated” viruses, although “isolation” is claimed, has never been published anywhere nor has anybody
even claimed such a characterization.

5. The photo of the hepatitis B “viruses” does not show isolated structures, but – as the image title already
says, an agglutinate. This is the scientific/medical term for proteins from the blood that are clumped
together, as is typical for coagulations. Typically, round and also crystal structures accrue – depending on
the condition of the blood sample – as a consequence.

In summary, it must be said that these photos are an attempt of fraud committed by the researchers and
medical scientists involved, as far as they assert that these structures are viruses or even isolated viruses.
To what extent the involved journalists and authors of textbooks have contributed to this fraud knowingly or
only out of gross negligence, I don´t know. Everyone who starts researching the medical literature, will
quickly encounter statements and references that Koch´s first postulate can´t be fulfilled (i.e.
Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben, 1997 [“A short history of the microbes”]; editor: Verlag
für angewandte Wissenschaft). How these authors who claim the existence of viruses could overlook that,
remains a riddle.

Could it be that the term “Contagium” = “Gift” (poison/toxin) = “Virus” from the 18th and 19th century was
applied in the 20th century to the cell components which were named “viruses” since the electron
microscope was introduced in 1931? And in order to hide this, the “disease causing viruses” have often
been described, yet have never been isolated? And then they were used as seemingly logical explanation
for poisonings and adverse effects of vaccination, as Luhmann (1995) (i.e.) writes about the symptomatic
of Hepatitis B, which was observed for the first time in 1985 following smallpox vaccinations, and 1938
following measles vaccinations? The copies in the textbooks show only homogenous structures within cells
and nothing that looks like something which has been isolated. The biochemical characterization, which is
crucial, is completely lacking.

Robert Koch and colleagues, Prof. Rush, Prof. Max von Pettenkofer, Prof. Virchow have shown, for instance
by experiments and by observation of the Henle-Koch´s rules that by transmission of bacteria, the
supposed ‘contagium vivum’, it was not possible to cause the same disease. So Robert Koch modified
(weakened) the 3rd postulate of his teacher, the German anatomist Henle, in that the generation of a
similar symptom in animal experiments was now considered sufficient to prove the hypothesis of disease
causation by infectious bacteria. (See Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben).

So it does not surprise me that Prof. Alfred Fischer writes in his
book “Vorlesungen über Bakterien” (“[academic] lectures on
bacteria”) from 1897 (!): “As is true for any infectious disease – the
fact that it does not only take the addition of the bacteria (for
disease to occur) but also the unknown something of individual
predisposition, goes without saying.”

Stefan Lanka, Dec 2001
Source: http://neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm

Copyright ©2021 P a g e | 255 CovidReport.CV19News.ca

ARTICLES & RESEARCH

A STUDY ON INFECTIVITY OF ASYMPTOMATIC SARS-COV-2 CARRIERS
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32513410

In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection, and we conclude
that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak. No severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was detected in 455 contacts by
nucleic acid test.

COMMENT: Asymptomatic transmission between people is a myth! Masking or requiring anyone
to social distance who is not presenting with illness, is useless at best and cruel and inhuman
punishment at worst.

MORE to come….

Copyright ©2021 P a g e | 256 CovidReport.CV19News.ca