THE PRICE OF IGNORANCE AND SICK SOCIETY: ITS NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, FOR NON-HUMAN ANIMALS AND FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.

THE PRICE OF IGNORANCE AND SICK SOCIETY: ITS NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, FOR NON-HUMAN ANIMALS AND FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. Hermes Barquero Cambronero

2 Copyright © 2023 Hermes Barquero Cambronero All rights reserved. The author allows this document to be shared free of charge by any means possible, to have parts of this document mentioned in free-to-air videos and in free-to-air publications as long as they are cited as the author. But trading with this document is not allowed.

3 Introduction Only cowards read what suits them, so as not to be cowards I challenge you to read this document from beginning to end, and then draw your own conclusions. From the information, photographs and images contained in this publication, this publication is made for adults only. This writing is mainly about the rights of indigenous people, but other topics are also covered, such as animal rights, environmental protection, the Bible, Christianity, Freemasonry, the New Age, neo-Nazism and white supremacy, conspiracy theories, why the capitalist ideologies of the Right and neoliberals are evil, among others. This document is created to be disseminated free of charge by all possible means, without profit, the images and photographs are taken from different sources on the Internet because they serve as support and evidence for what is written. For this, he based me on the Fair Use because of the importance of these photographs and images being known.

4 PART I: Right-wing criminals, libertarians and neoliberals, such as Marcelo Gullo and Gloria Álvarez, have compared indigenismo with Nazism, which is quite stupid, and later you will understand why he called these two characters criminals and in general all the of the political Right, to all the Libertarians and to all the Neoliberals. The following is a screenshot of the post titled: - Marcelo Gullo, on the conquest of America: Indigenismo shares ideas with the Nazis. The following is a screenshot of a publication commenting on the statements of Gloria Álvarez titled: - Compare indigenismo with Nazism and they destroy it on social networks. In Godínez Liberal's account, the following is commented regarding the statements of Gloria Álvarez: - Likewise, she explained how indigenismo has nothing to envy to Nazism.

5 Comparing indigenismo with Nazism is very stupid because the indigenous and those of us who defend the indigenous (even if we are not indigenous) have never caused massacres and genocide of those who are not indigenous. But, from the past to the present, those who are not indigenous (European whites, Creole whites, white mestizos, brown mestizos and even some blacks) have caused abuse, torture, rape, murder and massacres of indigenous people. And the massacre and genocide of indigenous people is something that continues in the present with the complicity of the majority of humanity, which is complicit and guilty for this, for their indifference and for not caring about the lives of the indigenous people. The damage that non-indigenous people continue to do to indigenous people today is comparable to Nazism. For example, in the government of Jair Bolsonaro, massacres of indigenous people were committed by non-indigenous people, by the military and by the Brazilian police, and this is the same in all the countries of this continent that the colonizers called America, and these crimes went unpunished in Lula's pacifist government. Some photos that prove the massacres of indigenous people committed in Brazil:

6 In the above photographs it is seen that one of the victims was just a child from the indigenous ethnic group called Guaraní Kaiowá, but since this child was an indigenous child, most do not care about this murder. Because if the victim had been a white child or a mixed-race child, all the media and most would be condemning the crime and demanding justice. The indifference of the majority to the injustices and crimes suffered by indigenous children is comparable to Nazism, but these hypocrites often call themselves pro-life for being against abortion when the lives of indigenous children do not matter to them. Comparing indigenismo with Nazism is stupid because those who are not indigenous are never considered criminals for defending their rights and their lives, and they are never killed by the police or by the military for the fact that they are not indigenous.

7 But, the indigenous people are considered as criminals by certain governments and by the media, like the disastrous television when they defend their rights, and they do suffer murders by guerrillas, police and military. For example, in Paraguay in 2022, indigenous people called Alcides Romero and Rodrigo Gómez González were assassinated by the EPP (Paraguayan People's Army). In Paraguay, an indigenous man named Lorenzo Silva Arce was assassinated in 2019. Most of the time, the murders of indigenous people are downplayed as if the lives of indigenous people were worth less to the majority, therefore, this indifference of the majority towards the lives of indigenous people is comparable to Nazism.

8 In Indonesia, in 2010, a video circulated where the soldiers of this country tortured indigenous people of the ethnic group known as the Papuans. The following is an image from the video: In 2018, indigenous people from Buenaventura in Valle del Cauca in Colombia were tied up and tortured.

9 Libertarians, neoliberals and the right are just as genocidal as indigenous. Indigenous people today continue to suffer genocide and injustice. And the Right, the libertarians and the neoliberals do not care about the lives of indigenous people and their suffering. And by the way, fanatical atheists and fanatical Christians are the same, both are instruments of neo-colonization, many atheists are just as racist, white supremacist, cruel, insensitive, lacking in empathy and sexist as most Christians. And also many atheists place money and technology above life on this planet, being just as capitalist as Christians. When libertarians or neoliberals talk about freedom, they refer only to the economic part, placing money above the lives of indigenous people and the environment. On the other hand, comparing Nazism with indigenism is stupid because Nazism is based on the white supremacy of the Aryan race, in any case, it is the colonialism of the past and the neocolonialism of the present promoted by the Right, by libertarians and by neoliberals. comparable to Nazism for being based on white supremacy and continuing to oppress indigenous people. All kinds of injustices and atrocities continue to be committed against indigenous ethnic groups with the complicity of whites and mestizos, and most of the time these atrocities and injustices go unpunished. The first Libertarian named Simón Bolívar, everything he did to help the independence of some countries was only to benefit the whites and the mestizos,

10 Simón Bolívar did not care about the indigenous people, from Simón Bolívar you can see the evil of the libertarians. I do not celebrate the invasion of October 12, and I do not celebrate the founding of countries either, because countries are only an invention of colonialists and neocolonialists of whites and mestizos. When the Spanish-speaking countries became independent from Spain, Brazil became independent from Portugal, the United States and Canada became independent from Great Britain, everything was for the benefit of whites and mestizos only, because abuse, torture, rape, and massacres of natives. The indigenous people, always from the past to the present, were treated as inferior to whites and mestizos. For this reason, celebrating the arrival of Europeans in America and celebrating independence or the founding of republics is just as evil and disastrous, since both are based on the extermination of indigenous people and on replacing the indigenous people with whites and mestizos, in displacing indigenous people. On the other hand, it is true that the majority of indigenous people, at present, are unfortunately Christianized and are part of Christian religions, but this does not take away their rights and does not mean that they continue to suffer unforgivable injustices. In addition, it is not the fault of the majority of the indigenous people of the present, being Christianized and being part of Christian religions, it is the fault of the colonization by Europeans of Christianity, of the neo-colonization continued by the mestizos, and of centuries of evangelization that indigenous people have suffered from whites and mestizos. Indigenous are hundreds of different ethnic groups, they are not a single ethnic group and each ethnic group is different from the others, but those who hate the indigenous speak and write as if the indigenous were a single ethnic group, generalize them and put them in the same bag. For example, these criminals speak and write, implying that all the hundreds of indigenous ethnic groups and all the indigenous people of each ethnic group kill, bury alive or sacrifice children born with a physical defect or physical disability, and deny the atrocities committed by the colonizers affirming that it is a Black Legend. But, their god from the Bible commands to kill children and pregnant women: Isaiah chapter 13, verse 18: they will sweep away the young with bows, they will not have compassion on the fruit of the womb, nor will their eyes have mercy on children. Hosea chapter 13, verse 16: Samaria will be desolate, because it rebelled against its God; they will fall by the sword; their children will be dashed to pieces, and their pregnant women will be ripped open.

11 Psalms chapter 137, verses 9: Blessed is he who takes and dashes his little ones against the rock. All the colonizers were Christians, therefore, it is obvious that they obeyed the word of their biblical god, so this saying that they murdered indigenous children and pregnant indigenous women is not a Black Legend, because the perverse god of the bible gives orders to murder children and pregnant women of the conquered peoples. But, always what suits them from the Bible, like the tale of Adam and Eve, Noah's boat; the birth, life, miracles, and resurrection of Jesus Christ; They say that it is as it is written, and even if they quote a single verse, they never say that it is taken out of context, but what does not suit them they say that they are metaphors, that it is symbolic or taken out of context. On the other hand, these haters of indigenous people today claim to be mostly pro-life because they are against abortion and in cases of abortion for rape they say that the child (referring to zygotes, embryos and fetuses alike) is not to blame and that that is why they oppose abortion even in cases of rape. But, they adore and believe in a god who in his word (the bible) orders the murder of children and pregnant women, which shows their hypocrisy. For example, the Argentine Agustín Laje has videos where he condemns abortion and this libertarian is pro-life. One of his videos is titled: Agustín Laje: Abortion is the social failure of taking the simple path. And in Brazil, those who support Jair Bolsonaro are also against abortion. For example, we found this news: Bolsonarista deputies try to speed up a project that prevents abortion, even in cases of rape.

12 The pro-lifers lie, making believe that from conception there is a fetus formed with a nervous system that allows it to feel. The reality is that in human pregnancy and in the pregnancy of animals of other species there are three stages: zygote, embryo and fetus. Science is very clear that zygotes and embryos do not feel pain because they do not have a formed central nervous system (brain), they do not have nociceptors (nerve endings for pain) and they do not have a limbic system, which is the part of the brain responsible for the emotions. The following photographs show the difference between a zygote, an embryo, and a fetus: Another thing in which the pro-lifers manipulate and lie is to show images, photos and videos only of fetal abortions to make believe that all abortions are fetal, and they never show photos, images and videos of ovular abortions and embryonic abortions.

13 Like all of the Right, the Libertarians and the Neoliberals, Agustín Laje has videos where he attacks indigenismo, one of these videos is titled: The myth of indigenismo by Agustin Laje and Mamela Fiallo. This video was uploaded to the YouTube channel called HIJOS BONICOS, which is a channel where the atrocities committed by the colonizers are denied, affirming that it was a Black Legend, just as neo-Nazis deny the atrocities committed by Hitler and the Nazis, affirming that they were It's about the Holotale. Also, this channel celebrates the colonization that they refer to as Hispanidad and, therefore, is one of the many channels on YouTube that promote hatred of indigenous people with impunity. Agustín Laje, has a video titled: 5 reasons to vote for Bolsonaro. Following Jair Bolsonaro's anti-indigenous hate speech during his rule in Brazil, invasions of indigenous territories by illegal miners, illegal loggers and ranchers increased. This caused the death of 570 indigenous children of the Yanomami ethnic group due to malnutrition, the poisoning of rivers with mercury and malaria caused by these invasions.

14 It is clear that the majority of humanity that is not indigenous feels a hatred for the indigenous in a conscious or unconscious way, and for this reason, they do not care that many indigenous people suffer extreme poverty, famine, invasion of territories, torture, abuse, rape and murders, in addition to the fact that her concept of beauty revolves around what is white and what is European. And most of them are hypocrites when they say they are proud of their indigenous roots and that they like indigenous handicrafts, when they don't care about all that the indigenous people suffer in the present. And it is very clear that the political Right, the Libertarians and the Neoliberals feel hatred for the indigenous people, even though they deny it and the cowards try to hide it, but they are very hypocritical defending zygotes and embryos that scientifically do not feel when they are against abortion, while they support that indigenous children who do feel suffering from famine, massacres, extreme poverty, abuse, malnutrition, poisoning and all kinds of atrocities, and support the indifference of the majority with what these children suffer. There are indigenous ethnic groups that need to preserve the ecosystems of the Amazon to survive. The destruction of the Amazons implies the extermination and genocide of these indigenous ethnic groups, for this reason, anyone who supports the destruction of the Amazons, minimizes the destruction of the Amazons or downplays the issue of the destruction of the Amazons is complicit and guilty of the murder of indigenous children. The disastrous Youtuber with thousands of his subscribers and famous who have sold millions of junk products called Dross, on his junk channel called Los Vlogs de Dross, in the video titled Dross comments on the fight on Twitter between Jair Bolsonaro VS Mark Ruffalo, defends Jair Bolsonaro and attacks Mark Ruffano for speaking out against Bolsonaro's destruction of the Amazons.

15 Dross is a friend of another disastrous Youtuber who calls himself Emmanuel Danann, on the channel of this Youtuber named Danann he attacks indigenism in his video called: You and your friend Laje can't stand this (LIVE DEBATE WITH PROGRE INDIGENISTA | Emmanuel Danann. It is known that the supposed indigenous person who called is actually the girlfriend of this character who calls herself Lilia Lemoine posing as an indigenous person, just like how it was discovered that the supposed feminist named Marla who called the program was her same girlfriend Lilia Lemoine acting a character. Another nefarious character who downplayed the destruction of the Amazons by repeating the same thing that Bolsonaro said was the atheist Dalas Review, who on Twitter, repeating the same phrases of Bolsonaro, wrote the following: - well, you are going to hallucinate a bit with what I have been investigating, but it is false that the Amazon is the lungs of the Earth and that it produces 20% of the oxygen. That it burns produces a lot of CO2 and it must be PREVENTED. But it IS NOT TRUE that it is the lung of the earth. That is false.

16 In these times there are people who brag about their atheism and think they are superior because of this, or people who consider white paganisms like the Vikings, the New Age and Satanism based on Social Darwinism as better than Christianity. But, the reality is that atheism, white paganisms such as the Vikings, the New Age and Right-wing satanisms based on Social Darwinism are just as harmful for the planet and for indigenous ethnic groups, just like religions Abrahamic (Jewish, Christian and Islamic). In Colombia, in 2019, an indigenous man was tortured and tied up with barbed wire.

17 That is why all the damage that those who are not indigenous with the complicity of the criminal state of these countries, the media such as television and the majority (society) do to the indigenous and their indifference to what indigenous people suffer in the present is comparable to Nazism. When criminal governments allow criminal whites and criminal mestizos to invade indigenous territories, in addition to causing torture, abuse, rape and murder of indigenous people, this also causes the death of thousands of wild animals, but for most it seems that wild animals they do not consider them animals and that in their speciesism they do not care about wild animals. When ranchers who raise bulls, cows and pigs invade indigenous territories and burn many hectares of forest in these territories to make pastures and enclosures for cows and bulls: thousands of wild animals are burned to death in a cruel and slow way, many times lasting long time with severe burns dying slowly.

18 When miners invade indigenous territories and poison the river water with Mercury, thousands of fish and other aquatic animals that live in those rivers slowly die from Mercury poisoning, in addition, many indigenous people who bathe in those rivers and drink water from those rivers also die.

19 When loggers invade indigenous territories, by cutting down hundreds of trees, when those trees are felled, thousands of baby birds die, and thousands of baby squirrels and other animals die when the trees where these animals make their nests are felled. In addition to the fact that wild animals die in a cruel and slow way due to the loss of their habitats, but it seems that many disastrous hypocrites who are vegans, animalists and anti-speciesists do not care about the lives of wild animals. Once a Spanish vegan told me that I could not defend animals of other species and indigenous people at the same time, and that I had to choose who to defend, what she is ignorant of, she does not understand is that the invasion of indigenous territories by whites and mestizos implies the death of millions of wild animals. On the other hand, this Spanish vegan is based on a Western Christian vision that considers that humans are not animals, humans are mammals and

20 primates, that is why we are animals, in fact, using the word animal as if it meant unworthy, a offense or an insult comes from the Christian vision and not from the indigenous vision. Another thing they say is that they don't care about the lives of the indigenous people because they hunt to survive and because they fish to survive, but the indigenous people don't farm extensively and they can't always travel to a supermarket or grocery store. They don't have the same financial resources to buy all the food needed to be vegan without suffering nutritional deficiencies, and they don't have the same knowledge to have vegan nutrition without suffering deficiencies as whites and mestizos. If we want indigenous people to be vegan, the first thing is to ensure that they have the same resources and the same knowledge so that they can be, that they can have access to vitamin B12 or produce it themselves, and that they have sources of income so that they can buy everything you need to avoid nutritional deficiencies, and then respectfully explain veganism to them. In the Western Christian vision, held by most whites and most mestizos, their god created nature to be dominated or mastered by humans, this implies that they can exploit nature to the point of exhausting or destroying it. In fact, whites and mestizos do not consider themselves part of nature and do not consider themselves part of an ecosystem. In the indigenous vision based on balance, only what is necessary to live is taken from nature, nature is not exhausted and it is not destroyed, only what is needed to live is obtained, and the indigenous people if they consider themselves as part of nature and an ecosystem. Money and technology by themselves are not bad, but what is bad is what capitalism does to place money and technology above the lives of indigenous people, above the lives of the animals of other species and above the environment. And for the political Right, the libertarians and the neoliberals: money and technology are the most important thing, and they put money and technology above life. Those who hate the indigenous people generalize them and put them in the same bag, affirming that all the hundreds of indigenous ethnic groups and all the indigenous people of each ethnic group practiced cannibalism. What these criminals never say is that their Christian god affirms that if they disobey him, he will cause fathers and mothers to devour their own children as punishment, that is, that these criminals who hate indigenous peoples and they speak or write about indigenous people as if they were a single ethnic group, they worship a god who incites cannibalism: Leviticus chapter 26, verses 26, 27 and 28: If even with this you will not listen to me, but proceed against me, I will proceed against you in anger, and will

21 punish you seven times for your sins. And you shall eat the flesh of your sons, and you shall eat the flesh of your daughters. Deuteronomy Chapter 28, verse 53: And you shall eat the fruit of your womb, the flesh of your sons and of your daughters that the Lord your God gave you, in the place and in the distress with which your enemy will distress you. Jeremiah chapter 19, verse 9: And I will make them eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and each one shall eat the flesh of his friend, in the siege and in the distress with which their enemies and those who seek will press them their lives. And if someone does not believe me that these atrocities are written in the Bible, I challenge them not to be a coward, and to look for these chapters and these verses in their own Bible. When the indigenous ethnic groups hunted to survive and not for pleasure, they only hunted what was necessary to survive, but in white cultures since before Christianity, such as the Vikings, it was part of their rituals to their gods to eat large amounts of red meat and in excess. For example, in Iceland, the Vikings made the walrus extinct. The following screenshot is from a NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC post titled: Vikings Destroyed Walruses in Iceland. In the Western Judeo-Christian vision: the god of whites and mestizos is not nature, that is why those who worship that god consider pagans, those who adore forces of nature, the god of whites and mestizos is a god separated from nature. In the indigenous vision: a creator god called Manitú or Great Spirit in the Cheyenne and in the Sioux, Taiowa or Tawa in the Hopi, Sibú in the Bribris and in the Cabécares, Ñamandú in the Guarani, Omama in the Yanomami, Nubu or Ngöbö In the Guaimíes (today known as Ngäbe or Ngöbe) before they converted to the Christian religion Mama Tatda, or with any other name and history

22 depending on the ethnic group, that Creator is one with nature, lives within nature and does not it is separate from nature. Before colonization, there were buffaloes in the United States and Canada, and there were llamas, alpacas, and vicuñas in the Andes, but animals such as bulls, cows, and pigs were brought by the colonizers, as well as cows and bulls, as they had a system Very large digestive systems generate large emissions of Carbon Dioxide and Methane that increase the problem of climate change, and ranchers destroy thousands of hectares of forest to make pastures for bulls and cows. The cowboys who raised bulls and cows for the species industry were the ones who killed the most natives (indigenous) to keep their lands. In the genocide of the Selknam (also known as Ona) carried out by the Nazi and racist state of Argentina and Chile: the cattle settlers and the SETF company (Sociedad Explotadora de Tierra del Fuego) which was a cattle company, were the ones who they murdered the indigenous people of the Selknam or Ona ethnic group until they were completely exterminated. The indigenous people have always been considered by the majority and by the criminals in power as a burden on society, as a problem, as an obstacle to progress and as uncivilized, by whites and mestizos who call progress and civilization to be destroyed and pollute the environment. But I, being white and mestizo, consider the majority of whites and the majority of mestizos as the problem, as the plague and the virus of the planet, and not the indigenous people. For me it is a delusion that we are all equal: I, being white and mestizo, consider indigenous people better than whites and mestizos. The 75% of the world population made up of whites and mestizos is the one that is polluting and destroying the planet the most, the 5% of the population made up of indigenous people does not generate as much pollution and does not generate as much destruction of the planet due to having a style of life different from the majority. To me, being white and mestizo, the way of being, the vision of the world and the way of living of the indigenous people seems better, and even the black hair, the slightly slanted or almond-shaped eyes, and their brown skin more resistant to the sun's rays, which is less irritated and with less body hair, seem better to me. Unlike most, I consider the physical features of the indigenous people to be features of great beauty. And those Asian features of a part of the indigenous ethnic groups, such as their slightly slanted or almond-shaped eyes, inspire me with wisdom and tranquility. But, the hatred of the indigenous in this sick society is also due to their physical features. And for this reason, those in power have wanted to exterminate them, since they hate them for everything, and see them as simple objects in which to express their death or destructive impulses.

23 Although whites and mestizos learned to have the same way of being and the same vision of the world as indigenous people, for me indigenous people are not replaceable by whites and mestizos. And I do believe that the way of being, the vision of the world and the way of living of the majority of whites and of the majority of mestizos does have a genetic component, just like how, I believe that the way of being, the The worldview and way of life of the majority of indigenous people also has a genetic component. Since before Christianity, white cultures such as the Celts, Slavs, Vikings, Greeks and Romans practiced hunting for pure pleasure without being a necessity to survive, so it is true that whites bring by their genetics that of being more predatory.

24 Although I have to clarify that, in the case of the Greeks, there were people who defended animals like Pythagoras and his Pythagorean school, Porphyry and some others. Hunting for pleasure, cockfighting, and bullfighting were brought to this continent by Christian Europeans. And scientifically, animals of other species do feel because they have a nervous system, and that animals feel pain and suffer is the only thing that should matter to respect a life, and not that garbage that the Abrahamic religions (Jewish, Christian and Islamic) teach that a life only matters and has value if it is human, if it is intelligent, if it reasons or if it has a soul. The following Roman mosaics depict hunting for pleasure and cockfighting practiced by the Romans: I cannot be sure that the Persians were white, but the Persians also practiced hunting for pleasure, the Aryans from Persia conquered India, the Persians conquered the Egyptians, and the Persians did greatly influence white cultures like the Romans, like the Celts And like the Vikings. And also the first monotheistic religion, called Zoroastrianism, is of Persian origin and influenced the creation of other monotheistic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). We can even relate the Persians to bullfighting, because the Persian god Mithras is depicted killing a bull, Mithraism was very popular among Roman soldiers.

25 The Romans conquered the Etruscans in Italy, but the Etruscans also suffered from the invasions of the Celts, so it can be said that it is part of the predatory genetics of white cultures: invading, massacring, enslaving, subduing and conquering others. The following photos are from Zoroastrianism, of a Roman statue of the Persian god named Mithras slaying a bull found in the British Museum, London, and of a statue of the Persian god slaying a bull called the Goat Mithras found in Spain. In the Persians, with Zoroastrianism, I also start the belief that light represents good and, therefore, to associate the color white with good, and the belief that darkness represents evil and consequently of associating the color black with evil.

26 This belief that light represents good and darkness represents evil, has a racist connotation, and is present in the Abrahamic religions (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic), Hinduism, Buddhism, Gnosticism, Freemasonry, in the Rosicrucians, and in the New Age. Light and darkness should not be considered as enemies, and should not be considered as synonymous with good and bad. Light and darkness must be considered complements that need each other to exist, and with the meaning that light represents the active aspect of nature, heat and fire, and that darkness represents the passive aspect of nature, cold and water, and that a balance between the two is needed for everything to exist. Also in Asia, white people have greater privileges, for example, Chinese and Japanese who are white have greater privileges in Asia, while indigenous ethnic groups from Asian countries such as the Ainus and Okinawans from Japan also suffer discrimination, injustice and prejudice. The criminals deny that the colonizers treated the indigenous people as slaves and as inferiors, and they deny everything, saying that it is a Black Legend. But your god in the bible, both in the Old Testament and in the New Testament, does support human slavery: Exodus chapter 21, verses 20 and 21: If someone hits his male or female slave with a stick, and as a result of the blow he or she dies, his crime will be punished. But, if after one or two days the slave recovers, the offender will not be punished because the slave was his property. Leviticus chapter 25, verse 44: As for the male and female slaves that you may have from the pagan nations that surround you, from them you may acquire male and female slaves. The slavery of indigenous people was only prohibited if the indigenous people accepted to submit, to let themselves be dominated, if they accepted to be treated as inferiors, if they converted to Christianity and if they submitted to the will of the kings of Europe. But, the natives who did not accept all this, were used as slaves and the European colonizers were allowed to do whatever harm they wanted. And many who defend colonization will say that if the indigenous people had not been forced to convert to Christianity, they would be making human sacrifices and animal sacrifices to their gods. But this is not true, you can worship the indigenous gods without making human sacrifices or animal sacrifices, offering them only offerings of plant foods, drinks, incense and indigenous dances. Just as many of the Christians adore that nefarious biblical god without obeying his orders to have slaves and to murder children of the colonized cultures. Proof that miscegenation was promoted by royalty, by governments, by settlers, by whites and by mestizos as a form of extermination of the indigenous to whiten the new generations, to make the new generations Christian, and so

27 that the new generations grow up with the way of being and the vision of the world of Christian whites, also so that the new generations grow up with a concept of colonial beauty that revolves around what is white and what is European, we have it in the same statements of the presidents of Mexico and celebrities of Mexico: Francisco Bulnes and others affirmed that, in order to incorporate the indigenous people into society, the indigenous people had to lose their language, lose their customs, and continue with the biological miscegenation, so that after a short time they would all become white. Justo Sierra Méndez also considered the indigenous as unsuitable for progress until, according to him: - The indigenous have acquired respect for landowners and latifundistas. Justo Sierra Méndez was the son of Justo Sierra O'Reilly who asked the United States for help in 1847 to exterminate the Mayans in Yucatán and this criminal has a statue in his honor in Mexico. Porfirio Diaz also had the habit of having his portraits represented as white as a way of supporting the whitening of the new generations through miscegenation. As they mentioned in a video about Whitexicans and racism in Mexico: - miscegenation meant making what was indigenous more white. José Vanconcelos said: - It is time to proclaim, without reservations, that both the Aztec and the civilizations that preceded it, formed an aborted case of humanity. The only means of saving such decayed towns is the one used by the Spaniards, the miscegenation legalized by the Papal Bull that authorized the marriages of Spaniards and natives. And with miscegenation, the total substitution of the old soul for a new soul, through the miracle of Christianity. The fact that we have so many millions of Indians in Mexico should not weigh us down, as long as the castizo tendency persists. José Clemente Orozco mentioned: -The Indians should already be considered finished, they are dead and there is no way to revive them, or for what.

28 Also, when whites and mestizos refer to mestizaje as improving the race, that phrase of improving the race implies hatred and racism against the indigenous, it implies that the indigenous are seen as inferior and that according to them, mestizaje improves the race because they acquire characteristics of Europeans whom they consider better and superior. With this, I do not want to say that I am opposed to an indigenous person and a person who is not indigenous falling in love, it is not miscegenation itself that I am criticizing, all people have the right to fall in love with whoever they want regardless of ethnicity , ethnicity should never be an obstacle for people of different ethnicities to fall in love. But what, if critical of this, is that miscegenation was promoted by the Catholic Church, by royalty, by the governments of these countries, by whites

29 and by mestizos as a form of extermination of the indigenous, and that it continues promoting in this way in the present. Before colonization, in some indigenous ethnic groups (not all), homosexuality was not considered a bad thing. The Mochi and Chimú ethnic groups in Peru, the Aymaras of the Andes, the Mapuches in Chile and Argentina, the Chanés in the Amazon, the Ava Guarani and others did not consider homosexuality to be something bad before colonization. Also, in the Aztecs there was a belief in a god called Xochipilli. Xochipilli was the patron of male homosexuality and the patron of male prostitution. In the following photographs you can see sculptures that show how in the indigenous Mochi and Chimú ethnic groups of Peru, homosexuality was not considered something bad or immoral before colonization and a photo of the sculpture of the Aztec god called Xoxhipilli: Phrases said by the colonizers who, being Christians, were homophobic and felt hatred (envy) for the indigenous people because homosexuality was accepted in some ethnic groups are: Catholic priest Diego de Landa: - They are sodomites by nature, and there can be no type of salvation for them. Spanish colonizer Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo: - The Indians seem to be given to this accursed habit of sodomy. Spanish colonizer Diego de Almagro: - They love men of the same sex, and they are the biggest sinners in this matter.

30 There are also patriarchal indigenous ethnic groups where society is controlled by men and matriarchal indigenous ethnic groups where society is directed by women. Some examples of matriarchal indigenous ethnic groups are: the Zapotecs in Mexico, the Bribris in Costa Rica, the Akan in Africa, the Mosuo in China, the Hopi in the United States, the Iroquois in the United States and Canada, the Cherokee in the United States, the Haida in Canada and others. As for the patriarchal indigenous ethnic groups, I am not going to mention them, for one reason, I accept that the indigenous ethnic groups also have errors and defects, I have never idealized them, what I have affirmed and will always affirm is that the indigenous are better than the whites and mestizos in many ways. What happens is that when movies, television series, cartoons, the political Right, Christians, libertarians and neoliberals mention the negative part of some indigenous ethnic groups, they do so solely and exclusively with the aim of promoting the hatred and contempt for the indigenous people by generalizing and lumping together all the hundreds of indigenous ethnic groups and all the indigenous people of each ethnic group. For this reason, it is unnecessary to mention the negative part of some ethnic groups, because movies, television series, cartoons, the political Right, Christianity, libertarians and neoliberals already do it. And we know that the majority is not objective in understanding that, although some indigenous ethnic groups had their negative side, they also had their positive side, and most of them focus a lot on the negative of these ethnic groups to generalize them all and because they have a conscious hatred or unconscious against the indigenous, then they only focus on the negative of these ethnic groups. The genocides promote the generalization and lumping together all the indigenous ethnic groups and all the indigenous people of each ethnic group as a way of promoting hatred of the indigenous people, for example, the murderers of indigenous peoples in the United States and a part of the Bolsonarists in Brazil express this with the phrase: - a good Indian is a dead Indian. In the following screenshot, a Brazilian criminal named Neto Ferraz states the following: -good Indian, he's a dead Indian.

31 The whites and mestizos who hunt for pleasure without being a necessity to survive, who are bullfighters, who are galley fighters or who support these atrocities, believe that this is manhood, strength, bravery or power. Just as whites and mestizos who humiliate, despise, discriminate, mistreat, torture and murder indigenous people, believe that this is manhood, strength, bravery or power, deep down they are the same manifestation of machismo, but with two different victims. Whites and mestizos who hunt for pleasure without being a necessity to survive, who are bullfighters, who are those who practice cockfighting or who support these atrocities; they enjoy and take pleasure in dominating, subduing, causing fear, torturing and killing animals of other species. In the same way, in which the whites and the mestizos who hate the indigenous people; They enjoy and feel pleasure in humiliating, dominating, subduing, causing fear, torturing and murdering indigenous people, which is why they are two sides of the same coin. The following painting is a tribute to the colonizer Francisco Pizarro, this painting is found in the Catholic cathedral of Lima in Peru, in which Francisco

32 Pizarro is seen holding a sword and pointing his hand to the indigenous people in a dominant way so that they enter a boat. Also like Christianity, it sees nudity as something bad and causes lust. In this painting where a tribute is made to the colonizer Francisco Pizarro located in the church of Lima in Peru, where Pizarro holds a sword and points with his hand in a dominant way to three naked indigenous people to get into a boat, what they mean is that the nudity practiced by some indigenous ethnic groups that lived in warmer areas according to them was a reason to subdue and dominate them, since seeing the body and nudity as bad or immoral, they believe that nudity incites sexual depravity. But, in reality, those who see the body, sexuality and nudity as something bad or immoral are the sexually depraved. Europeans learned to wear clothes because they lived in colder places. In the case of the indigenous ethnic groups of this continent: the indigenous ethnic groups that lived in warmer places were where they walked naked or in loincloths, and the indigenous ethnic groups that lived in colder areas such as the Andes mountain range, and in colder places from Canada and the United States, were the ones who wore the most clothes.

33 Whites and mestizos define Humility according to Christianity, machismo and colonialism, therefore, they interpret the Humility of the indigenous people as that the indigenous people must humiliate themselves, submit and allow themselves to be dominated. But, the concept of Humility of the indigenous does not consist of humiliating oneself, it does not consist of submitting and it does not consist of allowing themselves to be dominated. Those who hate indigenous people have always seen indigenous people as prey. The following photographs are of the genocide and extermination of indigenous people of the Selknam ethnic group in Argentina and Chile: For this reason, it is stupid when Right-wing, Libertarian and Neoliberal criminals compare indigenismo with Nazism, because the indigenous people have never caused genocide and exterminations of those who are not indigenous. But, those who are not indigenous have caused exterminations and genocides of indigenous people until today they are only 5% of the world population.

34 In their machismo, whites and mestizos believe that being a man, brave or powerful is to humiliate, subdue and dominate the indigenous, and they make the indigenous believe that to be a man, brave or powerful, they must silently endure being humiliated, subdued and dominated. For this reason, the whites and mestizos have evangelized the indigenous with Christianity so that, through those Christian teachings of loving your enemies, turning the other cheek and forgiving everything, they allow the whites and mestizos to continue hurting them in silent and without protest. In the countries of this continent, the police and military also oppress indigenous people and treat them as criminals when they protest for their rights. In these countries, there are criminal police officers and criminal soldiers who murder indigenous people with impunity: Also, the biblical god says in his word (the Bible) that he created the earth or nature to be dominated, subdued or ruled by the human being. And the indigenous people, because of their skin color, relate more to the land and part of being indigenous is taking care of the land, this is interpreted by the whites and by mestizos as meaning that the indigenous have a skin color

35 more similar to the land, and to take care of the earth they must be subdued and dominated. Genesis, chapter 1, verse 28: And God blessed them, saying to them: Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Also in the indigenous vision of the world, the earth is interpreted as a Mother, and therefore the earth is represented as a female figure, and the biblical god in his word (the bible) says that women must submit to the man and that the husband will have authority over his wife. Genesis chapter 3, verse 16: He said to the woman: I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth, with pain you will give birth to children; and yet your desire will be for your husband, and he will have dominion over you. 1 Timothy chapter 2, verses 11, 12 and 13: Let the woman learn quietly, with all obedience. I do not allow the woman to teach or to exercise authority over the man, but to remain silent. Because Adam was created first, then Eve. That is why, for the whites and the mestizos, that in the indigenous vision the earth is represented with the female figure of a mother, and the indigenous people consider themselves as protectors of the land, the whites and the mestizos they unconsciously interpret that the land and its protectors (the indigenous) must be dominated and subdued as part of their Christian archetypes. In the encomienda, the encomenderos, as a way of demonstrating their hatred and their domination over the indigenous people, aggressively took them by the hair. At present, politicians, the military and the police do the same thing, aggressively grabbing the indigenous people by their hair as a way of subjugating them, showing hatred and domination over the indigenous people. In the following images, in one of the Tepetlaoztoc codex, he looks like an encomendero, after making an indigenous person bleed, he takes his hair as a way of demonstrating hatred and domination over the indigenous person. In one photograph, police officers in Brazil who have evicted indigenous people from a building grab one dominantly by the hair, and in another image an undercover agent of the government of Guillermo Lasso in Ecuador makes the same gesture of grabbing an indigenous man in a dominant way by the hair.

36 Another similarity between white and mixed-race hunting for pleasure with the European colonizers is that both used hunting dogs. The colonizers used hunting dogs to persecute, torture, subdue, and kill indigenous people, just as whites and mestizos who hunt for pleasure use hunting dogs to persecute, torture, subdue, and kill animals of other species. Image of a hunting dog used by the colonizers to dominate and subdue the indigenous people, and image of the manuscript on the hounding:

37 Even the settlers used indigenous children as food for their hunting dogs. Of course, as I already explained, the genocidal deny all this, referring to the issue as Black Legend. Illustration of settlers feeding indigenous children to their hunting dogs as a way of training their dogs to subdue and dominate the indigenous people:

38 Bernardo Vargas Machuca (1557-1622) who wrote a book called Defense of the Conquest of the Indies, expressed: - The Indian is very afraid of the horse and the arquebus, but more afraid of the dog, which, hearing the barking, does not stop the Indian. The dogging was carried out meticulously. In the first step, the mastiffs were locked up for three days without food. The indigenous was tied to a stick, and they tried to ensure that the number of dogs was greater than the possibilities of the indigenous, in such a way that he could never survive. It wasn't a duel, it was an execution. Once finished, the remains of the perreados were exposed in the square so that they served to dominate and subdue the rest of the indigenous people. In any case, the European colonizers seeing the body as something bad, sexuality as immoral and nudity as bad, because of racism, because of the indigenous people worshiping other gods, because of the skin color and hair color of the indigenous people, and Because they saw them as inferior, they considered them disgusting, and since they were speciesists, they used the word pig as a synonym for disgusting, that's why they called the indigenous people pigs or peccaries, and in their phrases they compare dogs devouring indigenous people with dogs devouring pigs or peccaries. . Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas said: - And I saw that the Spaniards threw dogs at the Indians so that they would tear them to pieces, and I saw them harness many very brave dogs that, seeing an Indian, would tear him to pieces in a creed, and better they rushed at him and ate him as if he were a pig. These dogs made great havoc and carnage. In plate XXII of the book Narratio regionum indicarum, written in 1598: - Balboa throws several Indians guilty of the terrible sin of sodomy to the dogs, so that they lacerate them. This illustration represents an event in Panama: in 1513, the colonizer Vasco de Balboa threw 40 indigenous people accused of sodomy (homosexuality) to the dogs.

39 The eroticization of the extermination is in what they felt pleasure to see how the naked natives were devoured by the dogs. Pedro Cieza de León, who was a colonizer who explored the area between Panama and Bolivia, said: - The peoples of the mountains and coast hold homosexuality in high esteem. The colonizer Hernán Cortés, in a letter to King Carlos V, wrote: - We know and have been informed without a doubt that everyone (the indigenous inhabitants living in the area that today makes up the Mexican state of Veracruz) practices the abominable sin of sodomy. Also, just as the ranchers brand bulls, cows and calves with boiling iron, the colonizers did the same with the indigenous people, the colonizers branded them with boiling iron, but the defenders of colonization always denied everything saying that it is Black Legend.

40 Proof of how the Catholic Church did promote hatred of indigenous people is found in the following sentences: The Catholic priest Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, in his book titled Treatise on the just causes of the war against the Indians, affirmed: - With perfect right the Spaniards exercise their dominion over these barbarians of the New World and adjacent islands, which in prudence, ingenuity and all kinds of virtues and human sentiments are as inferior to Spaniards as children are to adults, women to men, as cruel and inhuman people to very meek, exaggeratedly intemperate to continents and moderates, finally, I am about to say what monkeys to men. The just war is the cause of just slavery, which, contracted by the law of nations, entails the loss of freedom and property. But, in addition to considering with this phrase the indigenous people as inferior to Europeans, in this phrase, by considering children as inferior to adults, it promotes abuse and mistreatment against minors, considering women as

41 inferior to men, promotes machismo and considering monkeys as inferior to humans promotes speciesism. The priest Tomás Ortiz affirmed the following: - The men of the mainland of the Indies eat human flesh, and are sodomitics more than any other generation. There is no justice among them, they walk naked, they have no love or shame, they are like donkeys, foolish, crazy, senseless; they have nothing to kill. When Christians talk about sodomy, they mean homosexuality, Christianity has always been homophobic. As for sexuality, nudity and semi-nudity; Christianity has considered all this as something immoral, bad or as a sin. It is proven that those who see sexuality, nudity and semi-nudity as something bad, as something immoral or as a sin are the most sexually depraved people who exist, those who sexually harass the most, who commit sexual abuse the most and who commit the most rapes. The Catholic religious named López de Gómara in his book General History of the Indies affirmed the following: - They easily associate with women, and even like crows or snakes, and worse; apart from the fact that they are great sodomites, lazy, liars, ungrateful, changeable and mean. Before colonization: homosexuality, sexuality, polygamy, nudity and seminudity were not considered bad, they were not considered a sin and they were not considered immoral by some indigenous ethnic groups, and this vision must have always remained, but the Christian colonizers with their lust and their morbidity spoiled everything. Painting by Diego Rivera that shows the slavery of indigenous people and the domination that the colonizers exercised over the indigenous people:

42 In some indigenous cultures, like in Greek culture, the naked body is considered art and something not to be ashamed of, not considered pornographic, and not considered immoral. For example, in various indigenous ethnic groups such as those living in the Xingu territory of Brazil, nudity is part of their rituals, ceremonies and Huka Huka fights. They see the body as art and that is why they use body paint in all their body.

43 In other indigenous ethnic groups such as the Waoranis or Huaoranis, the body and nudity are not considered as something bad and are not considered as something immoral. But, class-oriented Christians who hate indigenous people, and who, if they see the body and nudity as something bad, therefore, consider these indigenous ethnic groups as ordinary beings, lacking in modesty, as shameless and as immoral.

44 Also during colonization, the nudity and semi-nudity practiced, on the one hand, by the indigenous ethnic groups, was seen as a reason for the Christians to subdue and dominate them. Nudity should never be considered immoral, it should never be considered something indecent and it should not be considered something bad, but those who hate indigenous people consider the nudity practiced by some ethnic groups (not all) as a reason to subdue them and continue to oppress them, and also as a reason to exterminate the indigenous ethnic groups that live in isolation. The following is a screenshot where a criminal from Brazil named Vianei Pasa states the following: - Think of the naked Indians shot.

45 During the government of Jair Bolsonaro, the indigenous people of Xingu protested with the phrase out of fear painted on their bodies, as a way of telling other indigenous people not to let themselves be dominated and subjugated by Jair Bolsonaro's hateful policies against indigenous people.

46 José Mendes, who is a Brazilian in favor of Bolsonaro, made a montage copying this same indigenous person four times and as if two indigenous people were holding hands, as if implying that the indigenous ethnic groups where male nudity is practiced is because, according to the They are sodomites (homosexuals). In fact, these criminals who hate indigenous people use homophobic insults calling them faggots when they defend their rights. But in addition to this, José Mendes wrote this phrase in a mocking sense: -Meanwhile, in Xingú, Indians with their bare asses ask for Out of Fear.

47 Carlos Skarlack, who is an evangelical Christian from Brazil, made this comment: - Who paid these scoundrels who defend the thieves?

48 The Facebook account called Mídia NINJA published this photo, where an indigenous person protests against Bolsonaro with the phrase outside Bolsonaro painted on his body.

49 And a criminal named Rafael Casaes wrote in a comment to this photo: - Where are the Portuguese to clean up?

50 When these criminals refer to the extermination of indigenous people by the European colonizers with the phrase of making clean, it means that for them the indigenous people are garbage, they consider the indigenous people as disgusting beings that must be eliminated, and as for them the word pig o puerco means disgusting, they call the indigenous people pigs. In the following screenshot, a criminal named Maria Clara Pulcherio writes the following: - Look how the PT cares about the Indians. Scoundrels, filthy people, pigs, people of the worst kind.