Adventures in English for Young Learners

139 competence by encouraging learners to express their thoughts, feelings, and ideas in English, thereby developing their linguistic fluency and communicative effectiveness. Meaningful English instruction acknowledges and respects the cultural and social backgrounds of young learners, fostering inclusivity and cultural competence. Language is intricately intertwined with culture, identity, and social practices, shaping individuals' worldview and communication styles. Meaningful English instruction integrates elements of learners' cultural heritage, linguistic diversity, and lived experiences into language learning materials, activities, and discussions. By validating learners' cultural identities and perspectives, meaningful English instruction creates a supportive and inclusive learning environment where all learners feel valued, respected, and empowered to participate actively in the language learning process. Effective English instruction for young learners necessitates pedagogical approaches that prioritize meaningfulness, relevance, and authenticity (Herman et al, 2022; Xu et al, 2022). Utilizing authentic materials, reallife contexts, and interactive activities, educators create immersive and meaningful learning experiences that resonate with young learners' interests, experiences, and developmental needs. Additionally, incorporating learnercentered approaches, such as project-based learning, taskbased learning, and cooperative learning, allows learners to engage actively in authentic language use and meaningful communication. Moreover, fostering a

140 supportive and culturally responsive learning environment encourages learners to take risks, make meaningful connections, and develop their English language proficiency in meaningful and authentic contexts. The significance of meaningful English instruction for young learners lies in its capacity to engage learners cognitively, motivate and sustain their interest in language learning, facilitate language acquisition and retention, and promote cultural and social relevance. By prioritizing meaningfulness, relevance, and authenticity in English instruction, educators can create dynamic and enriching learning experiences that empower young learners to become proficient, confident, and culturally competent users of the English language. As such, meaningful English instruction stands as a pedagogical imperative in fostering lifelong language learning and intercultural competence among young learners in diverse educational contexts. To foster a meaningful process in teaching and learning, teachers need to utilize visual cues and gestural supports to teach English to young learners (Islahuddin, 2023; Maisarah, 2023). In the realm of teaching English to young learners, the incorporation of visual cues and gestural supports plays a pivotal role in enhancing comprehension, engagement, and retention of language input. It is sensible to explore the significance of visual cues and gestural supports in language teaching, drawing upon theoretical frameworks, empirical research, and pedagogical strategies.

141 Gestural supports encompass nonverbal cues, gestures, facial expressions, body language, and physical movements used to convey meaning, clarify instructions, and reinforce language input in English language teaching (Khan et al, 2023). Gestural supports serve as complementary modalities to verbal and visual cues, providing additional contextual information and reinforcing language comprehension. According to the embodied cognition theory, bodily movements and gestures play a crucial role in cognitive processing, memory retrieval, and concept formation, facilitating language learning through embodied experiences. Empirical evidence suggests that gestural supports enhance language acquisition and comprehension among young learners (Carneiro, 2021; Thu, 2022; Vadivel et al, 2023). Research indicates that gestures aid in the disambiguation of ambiguous language input, clarify meaning, and facilitate the understanding of abstract concepts. Moreover, gestures promote engagement, interaction, and participation in language learning activities, fostering a dynamic and interactive learning environment. Additionally, gestural supports facilitate cross-cultural communication and understanding by transcending linguistic barriers and conveying universal meanings and emotions. Incorporating visual cues and gestural supports into English language instruction requires deliberate pedagogical planning and implementation (Fisher, 2016; Lamessa et al, 2023; Picciuolo, 2023). Educators can utilize a variety of pedagogical strategies to effectively integrate

142 visual and gestural elements into language teaching activities. These may include pre-teaching vocabulary using visual aids, incorporating gestures to accompany verbal instructions, using body movements to demonstrate language concepts, and utilizing multimedia resources to provide contextualized language input. Furthermore, educators can scaffold learners' comprehension and production of language by gradually fading visual and gestural supports as learners' proficiency advances (Social Science Research, 2022; Özer et al, 2023). By gradually reducing reliance on external supports, educators foster learners' autonomy and independence in language learning while ensuring that they remain cognitively engaged and motivated. Additionally, educators should be mindful of cultural considerations when using gestural supports, ensuring that gestures are culturally appropriate and sensitive to learners' cultural backgrounds and experiences. Visual cues and gestural supports are integral components of effective English language instruction for young learners, enhancing comprehension, engagement, and retention of language content. By incorporating visual and gestural elements into language teaching activities, educators create dynamic and multimodal learning experiences that cater to diverse learning styles and preferences. Moreover, visual cues and gestural supports promote cognitive processing, facilitate language acquisition, and foster cross-cultural communication and understanding among young language learners. As such, the integration of visual cues and gestural supports stands

143 as a pedagogical imperative in promoting effective English language instruction for young learners in diverse educational contexts. This chapter discusses the effectiveness of gestural supports, encourages teachers to utilizes visual cues, and suggests that EYL Teachers need to fully aware of cultural differences in the teachinglearning process. B. Current Issues English as a global language holds immense importance in today's interconnected world. The desire to equip young learners with this vital skill has led to a surge in English language teaching (ELT) programs for this age group. However, this field faces a unique set of challenges that require innovative solutions. One prominent issue lies in teacher qualifications and competence. While enthusiasm for teaching young learners is crucial, strong English proficiency and pedagogical knowledge are equally important. Research suggests that a significant number of teachers, particularly in developing countries, lack specialized training in Teaching English to Young Learners (TEYL) methodologies. This can lead to a reliance on traditional grammar-focused approaches that fail to engage young learners and hinder their natural language acquisition process. Limited resources further exacerbate these challenges. Schools, especially in rural areas, often lack access to age-appropriate learning materials, technology, and well-equipped classrooms. This can restrict teachers'

144 ability to create dynamic and interactive learning environments that cater to the diverse learning styles of young learners . Another hurdle is ensuring student motivation. Young learners are naturally curious and energetic, but their attention spans are shorter. Traditional methods that emphasize rote learning and drills can quickly lead to disengagement. The pressure to achieve high scores on standardized tests can further diminish the joy of language learning. The impact of technology presents both opportunities and challenges. While educational apps, games, and online platforms offer engaging and interactive learning experiences, overreliance on technology can have drawbacks. The physical classroom environment and the importance of social interaction in language learning should not be neglected. Socioeconomic disparities can also play a role. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds may lack exposure to English outside the classroom, putting them at a disadvantage compared to their peers. Additionally, limited parental support can hinder their progress. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has added a new layer of complexity. The shift to online learning presented significant challenges for TEYL programs. Adapting methodologies to a virtual environment while ensuring accessibility for all students became a new frontier for educators.

145 Despite these challenges, the field of TEYL remains vibrant and evolving. Here are some key areas for improvement: 1. Investing in teacher training: Equipping teachers with specialized TEYL methodologies, strong English proficiency, and the ability to effectively utilize technology is crucial. 2. Developing age-appropriate materials: Creating engaging and interactive learning resources that cater to the specific needs and interests of young learners is essential. 3. Promoting a learner-centered approach: Shifting the focus from rote learning to communication and meaningful interaction will boost student motivation and improve language acquisition. 4. Fostering collaboration between teachers and parents: Providing parents with resources and strategies to support their children's English language learning journey at home can significantly impact achievement. 5. Leveraging technology strategically: Educational apps and games can be powerful tools when used thoughtfully to supplement classroom learning, not replace it. By addressing these current issues and implementing innovative solutions, educators can create a more effective

146 and engaging English language learning experience for young learners, equipping them with the skills they need to thrive in the globalized world. C. Theoretical Framework There are several well-known theories related to teaching English to young learners using visual cues and gestural supports. Here are some of them 1. Gesture-Based Instruction: This theory suggests that gestures can be used to support language development in young learners. It is based on the idea that gestures can help learners understand and remember new vocabulary and grammar structures. 2. Visual Phonics: This theory emphasizes the importance of visual cues in teaching reading and writing skills to young learners. It suggests that using visual aids such as pictures, charts, and diagrams can help learners understand the relationship between letters and sounds, and can improve their reading and writing abilities. 3. Multimodal Communication: This theory suggests that using multiple modes of communication, such as speech, writing, and visual cues, can help young learners develop their language skills. It emphasizes the importance of providing

147 learners with a variety of ways to express themselves and understand the world around them. 4. Sociocultural Theory: This theory emphasizes the importance of social context in language development. It suggests that young learners learn language through social interactions with others, and that visual cues and gestural supports can help facilitate these interactions and support language development. 5. Cognitive Theory: This theory suggests that young learners' cognitive abilities, such as memory and attention, play a crucial role in language development. It emphasizes the importance of providing learners with visual cues and gestural supports to help them focus their attention and remember new vocabulary and grammar structures. D. Main Ideas 1. The effectiveness of using gestures to support verbal instructions for young learners. Using gestures to support verbal instructions can be an effective method for teaching English to young learners. Gestures can help young learners understand and remember new vocabulary, concepts, and grammar rules. They can also help learners engage with the material and stay focused during lessons. Additionally, gestures can be used to provide visual cues that reinforce verbal instructions, making

148 it easier for young learners to follow along and participate in activities. However, it is important to note that the use of gestures should not replace verbal instructions, but rather be used in conjunction with them to enhance comprehension and learning. In the realm of language teaching for young learners, the use of gestures to support verbal instructions has garnered considerable attention as a pedagogical strategy aimed at enhancing comprehension, engagement, and learning outcomes. Gestures play a crucial role in facilitating cognitive processing and comprehension of verbal instructions among young learners (Ismail & Irnanda, 2022; Yunita et al, 2022; Istiqamah & Samtidar, 2023). According to the embodied cognition theory, bodily movements and gestures are intertwined with cognitive processes, influencing attention, memory, and conceptual understanding. When verbal instructions are accompanied by gestures, learners receive multimodal input that engages multiple sensory channels, enhancing their cognitive processing and comprehension of language content. Gestures provide visual cues that clarify meaning, disambiguate ambiguous language input, and reinforce key concepts, thereby scaffolding learners' understanding and retention of verbal instructions. Empirical research supports the efficacy of using gestures to support verbal instructions in language teaching contexts (Grant, 1977; On-lai 1994). Studies have shown that gestures aid in the comprehension of

149 spoken language, particularly for learners with diverse learning styles, linguistic backgrounds, and cognitive abilities. Furthermore, research indicates that the integration of gestures enhances retention of language content and improves learners' ability to follow instructions accurately and independently. By leveraging gestures to support verbal instructions, educators create an enriched learning environment that optimizes young learners' cognitive engagement and comprehension of language input. Gestures enhance engagement and motivation among young learners by making verbal instructions more dynamic, interactive, and memorable (Li, 2023). Gestures capture learners' attention, stimulate curiosity, and create a sense of novelty and excitement in language learning activities. According to selfdetermination theory, learners are more intrinsically motivated and engaged when they perceive activities as enjoyable, meaningful, and personally relevant. By incorporating gestures into verbal instructions, educators increase the perceived relevance and value of language learning tasks, fostering learners' intrinsic motivation and commitment to learning. Furthermore, gestures promote active participation and interaction in language learning activities, encouraging learners to express themselves verbally and nonverbally. By providing opportunities for physical movement and expression, gestures cater to kinesthetic learners who benefit from hands-on, experiential learning experiences. Moreover, gestures

150 facilitate social interaction and collaboration among learners, creating a supportive and inclusive learning environment where learners feel empowered to communicate and collaborate with their peers. Thus, by leveraging gestures to support verbal instructions, educators enhance young learners' engagement, motivation, and active participation in language learning activities. Integrating gestures into language teaching requires careful pedagogical planning and implementation to maximize effectiveness and ensure cultural sensitivity. Educators should select gestures that are clear, concise, and culturally appropriate, avoiding gestures that may be misinterpreted or offensive in diverse cultural contexts. Additionally, educators should model gestures explicitly and provide opportunities for learners to practice and reinforce their understanding through guided practice and feedback. Moreover, educators should be mindful of individual differences in learners' preferences, abilities, and cultural backgrounds when using gestures to support verbal instructions, adapting instruction accordingly to meet the diverse needs of learners. The use of gestures to support verbal instructions is an effective pedagogical strategy in language teaching for young learners, enhancing comprehension, engagement, and motivation. Gestures facilitate cognitive processing and comprehension of verbal instructions by providing

151 visual cues that clarify meaning and reinforce key concepts. Moreover, gestures enhance engagement and motivation among young learners by making language learning activities dynamic, interactive, and enjoyable. By integrating gestures into language instruction, educators create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that optimizes young learners' cognitive engagement, comprehension, and participation in language learning activities. As such, the use of gestures to support verbal instructions stands as a valuable pedagogical tool in promoting effective language learning for young learners in diverse educational contexts. 2. Incorporating visual cues, such as pictures, diagrams, or props to clarify instructions and reinforce key concepts. Visual cues encompass a wide array of visual stimuli, including images, illustrations, flashcards, charts, graphs, videos, and multimedia resources, used to convey linguistic concepts, vocabulary, and language structures (Zheng & Peng, 2022). Visual cues serve as scaffolds for comprehension by providing learners with concrete representations of abstract language forms and meanings. According to dual coding theory, information presented through both verbal and visual channels is more readily processed and retained in memory than information presented through verbal channels alone. Thus, integrating visual cues into English language instruction facilitates cognitive processing, aids comprehension,

152 and enhances long-term retention of language content among young learners. Empirical research demonstrates the effectiveness of visual cues in language learning contexts (Brady et al, 2016; Calder et al, 2021). Studies have shown that the use of visual aids enhances vocabulary acquisition, comprehension of grammar structures, and development of reading and writing skills among young language learners. Furthermore, visual cues promote active engagement and participation in language learning activities, particularly among visual and kinesthetic learners who benefit from multimodal learning experiences. By leveraging visual cues, educators create visually rich and interactive learning environments that cater to diverse learning styles and preferences, thereby optimizing the effectiveness of English language instruction for young learners. Teachers of English for Young Learners (EYL) are strongly suggested to use visual cues, such as pictures, diagrams, or props, to clarify instructions and reinforce key concepts. These visual aids can help young learners understand and remember new vocabulary, grammar rules, and language structures. Here are some ways teachers can incorporate visual cues into their teaching: a. Use pictures: Teachers can use pictures to illustrate new vocabulary words or concepts. For example, they can show a picture of a dog and ask students to identify its

153 name in their target language. This can help students associate the word with its meaning and improve their listening and speaking skills. b. Create diagrams: Diagrams can be used to explain complex concepts, such as grammar rules or sentence structures. For example, a teacher can draw a diagram of a simple sentence, showing the subject, verb, and object. This can help students understand the structure of sentences and improve their writing skills. c. Use props: Props can be used to make lessons more engaging and interactive. For example, a teacher can use a toy car to demonstrate the concept of transportation in a lesson. This can help students remember the vocabulary and improve their listening and speaking skills. d. Use flashcards: Flashcards can be used to reinforce key vocabulary words. Teachers can create flashcards with pictures and words in their target language and use them to play games, such as matching or memory games. This can help students learn new words and improve their reading and writing skills. e. Use videos: Videos can be used to expose students to authentic language use and cultural practices. For example, a teacher can show a video of people ordering food in a restaurant and ask students to identify the vocabulary words used in the video. This

154 can help students understand the context in which words are used and improve their listening and speaking skills. Incorporating visual cues into English language teaching for young learners can help make lessons more engaging, memorable, and effective. Teachers can use a variety of visual aids, such as pictures, diagrams, props, flashcards, and videos, to clarify instructions and reinforce key concepts. 3. Overcoming Cultural Differences in teaching-learning process of EYL Classroom Teaching English to young learners can be an enriching experience, but it can also be challenging. Here are some practical suggestions for teachers of English for Young Learners (EYLs) in teaching English using verbal cues and gestural supports, while also being mindful of cultural differences that are easily interpretable by young learners: a. Use simple, clear language: When teaching EYLs, it is essential to use simple and clear language that is easy for them to understand. Avoid using complex vocabulary or sentence structures that may be confusing. Use short, simple sentences and repeat key phrases often to reinforce learning. b. Use gestures and body language: Gestures and body language can be a powerful tool in teaching EYLs. Use gestures to illustrate actions, emotions, or ideas. For example, use a "thumbs up" to indicate approval or a "stop" gesture to

155 indicate that an activity should be paused. Use body language to convey enthusiasm, interest, or attention. c. Use visuals and props: Visual aids can help EYLs understand and remember new vocabulary and concepts. Use pictures, flashcards, or props to illustrate words or ideas. For example, use a toy car to illustrate the word "car." Use visuals to create a story, a sequence of events, or a timeline. d. Use songs and rhymes: Songs and rhymes can be a fun and engaging way to teach EYLs new vocabulary and grammar structures. Choose songs and rhymes that are ageappropriate and culturally relevant. Use actions and gestures to accompany the songs and rhymes to make them more engaging. e. Be mindful of cultural differences: EYLs come from diverse backgrounds, and it is essential to be mindful of cultural differences when teaching English. Use examples and materials that are culturally relevant and inclusive. Avoid making assumptions about students' cultural backgrounds and be open to learning about their cultures. f. Encourage participation: Encourage EYLs to participate in class activities and discussions. Use open-ended questions and prompts to encourage students to share their thoughts and ideas. Use group activities and pair work to encourage collaboration and peer learning. g. Provide feedback and praise:

156 Provide regular feedback and praise to EYLs to encourage their learning and progress. Use positive reinforcement to encourage students to continue learning and to build their confidence. h. Use technology: Use technology to enhance learning and engagement. Use educational apps, videos, and interactive websites to teach new vocabulary, grammar structures, and concepts. Use educational games to make learning fun and engaging. i. Use storytelling: Use storytelling to teach EYLs new vocabulary, grammar structures, and concepts. Choose stories that are age-appropriate and culturally relevant. Use props, gestures, and visuals to bring the story to life. j. Use role-play and drama: Use role-play and drama to teach EYLs new vocabulary, grammar structures, and concepts. Use role-play to simulate real-life situations, such as ordering food at a restaurant or buying tickets at a movie theater. Use drama to teach students how to express emotions and ideas through body language and voice. By following these practical suggestions, teachers of English for Young Learners can create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that encourages students to learn and grow.

157 E. Conclusion To sum up, the integration of gestures and visual cues into English language instruction for young learners represents a multifaceted pedagogical approach aimed at enhancing comprehension, engagement, and motivation in language learning contexts. The efficacy of incorporating gestures to support verbal instructions is underscored by research demonstrating its positive impact on comprehension, retention, and independent task performance. Similarly, the strategic use of visual cues, including pictures, diagrams, props, and multimedia resources, has been shown to promote active engagement, facilitate comprehension, and cater to diverse learning styles and preferences. Moreover, the practical suggestions provided for overcoming cultural differences in the teaching-learning process of English for Young Learners (EYLs) underscore the importance of cultural sensitivity, inclusivity, and relevance in language instruction. By adopting simple language, utilizing culturally relevant examples and materials, and fostering a supportive and participatory learning environment, educators can effectively navigate cultural diversity while promoting language acquisition and intercultural understanding.

158 References Acevedo, M. V. (2019). Young children play their way into intercultural understanding. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417727134 Alfarisy, F. (2021). English Language Learning Policy in Indonesia in the Perspective of Forming World Citizens with Intercultural Competence. Educational Professional Scientific Journal. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i3.207 Artiyana, RN (2018). Implementation of the English Language Program at Sdit Lukman Al Hakim International. Basic Education. Ali, N. L., Hamid, M. O., & Moni, K. (2011). English in primary education in Malaysia: Policies, outcomes and mn[e_bif^_lm’ fcp_^ _rj_lc_h]_m. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.584371 Arif, N. (2015). Removing English as Compulsory Subject from Primary Schools on the 2013 Curriculum Based on T_[]b_lm’ Ojchcih. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. Anh, D. T. N. (2019). EFL mno^_hn’m qlcncha mecffm: ]b[ff_ha_m and remedies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(6), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388- 0906017484.

159 Adomnik, J.G., 2012, The Effects of Self-Determination, Identification with School, and School Climate on Mc^^f_ S]biif Sno^_hn’m Amjcl[ncihm `il Fonol_ Education – PhD thesis, Graduate School of The University of Alabama, TUSCALOOSA . Al-Gb[g^c, A., 2017, ‘Bocf^cha [ Pimcncp_ Ehpclihg_hn ch Cf[mmliigm nblioab F__^\[]e [h^ Pl[cm_’, English Language Teaching, 10(6), 37. Agch, F., 2019, ‘Pimcncp_ Cf[mmliig Ehpclihg_hn, Ciij_l[ncp_ Learning Strategy, Reading Comprehension A]bc_p_g_hn: A Cill_f[ncih[f Sno^s’, LangEdu Journal. Arinda, P. & S[^cech, I.S., 2021, ‘Dc[fiac] F__^\[]e ni Pligin_ Deep Learning for EFL Speaking Learners in Online L_[lhcha Ehpclihg_hn: Sno^_hnm’ Vic]_m’, PROJECT (Proceeding Journal of English Education), 4(5). Ashworth, Mary and H. Patricia Wakefield. (2005). ESL for ages English Teaching Forum. Vol. 43. No. 1.Pages. 2 - 7. Washington DC,USA: United States Department of States. Agustiawati, H. 2022, TEACHING VOCABULARY THROUGH HOT SEAT TO YOUNG LEARNERS, Global Expert: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28–38. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey. Aaron, CA (2018). ENGLISH LEARNING FOR EARLY CHILDREN VERSUS LOCAL CULTURE. Early Horizons: Journal of Early Childhood Education.

160 https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v5i2.10499 Artila Dewi*, N.P., Sintadewi, M.D., & Suryantini, M.D. (2023). Urgency of Teaching English to Young Learners in Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities. Azis, M.A. (2023). ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF INTEGRATED SKILL TEACHING ON EFL LEARNERS' MOTIVATION AND ENGAGEMENT. Tomorrow's Education Journal. Agassy, F. S. (2020). Improving early childhood mno^_hnm’_hafcmb pi][\of[ls \s omcha [hcg[f jij oj slide media in Tk Aisyiyah Dolopo. Edupedia, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.24269/ed.v4i1.427. Akdogan, E. (2017). Developing vocabulary in game activities and game materials. Journal of Teaching and Education, 7(1), 31–65. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED617641.pdf Agch_ N_b[lc T[f_n. (2007). STUDENT’S PERCEPTION OF THE BENEFITS AND USE OF ONLINE TEACHING & LEARNING. Issues in Information Systems. doi:10.48009/1_iis_2007_15-23 Abh, K. (2011) ‘L_[lhcha ni n_[]b oh^_l ]olriculum reform: Tb_ jl[]nc]og _rj_lc_h]_ ch Sionb Kil_[’, ch I.K.E. Johnson and P. Golombek (eds) Research on second language teacher education. New York: Routledge, pp. 239–253. Block, D., Gray, J. and Holborow, M. (2012) Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge. Bonf_l, Y.G. (2005) ‘Cigj[l[ncp_ j_lmj_]ncp_m niq[l^m

161 communicative activities among elementary school n_[]b_lm ch Sionb Kil_[, J[j[h, [h^ T[cq[h’, Language Teaching Research [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr176oa.Brown, H.D. (2000) The principles of language learning and teaching. United States: Pearson Education. Baker, L.L. (2016). RE-CONCEPTUALIZING EFL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ENHANCING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE PEDAGOGY FOR THAI TEACHERS. TEFLIN Journal, 27, 23-45. Blake, B.R., & Pope, T.M. (2008). Developmental Psychology: Incorporating Piaget's and Vygotsky's Theories in Classrooms. Brady, M.P., Honsberger, C.F., Cadette, J.N., & Honsberger, T. (2016). Effects of a Peer-Mediated Literacy Based Behavioral Intervention on the Acquisition and Maintenance of Daily Living Skills in Adolescents with Autism. Education and training in autism and developmental disabilities, 51, 122-131. B[ll, J.J., 2016, ‘D_p_fijcha [ Pimcncp_ Cf[mmliig Cfcg[n_’, The IDEA Center, 61. Bliqh, N. & Ciie_, L., 2009, ‘Gcpcha _``_]ncp_ `__^\[]e ni jms]bc[nlc] nl[ch__m’, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 15(2), 123–128. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2015). Vygotskian and PostVygotskian Views on Children's Play. American Journal of Play. Brown, H.D. (2012). Principles of Language Learning and

162 Teaching (5th Edition). In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. In The process of education. Harvard Univer. Press. Bakhsh, S. A. (2016). Using Games as a Tool in Teaching Vocabulary to Young Learners. English language teaching, vol. 9, no. 7, hh. 120-128. Babakr, Z. H., Mohamedamin, P. and Kakamad, K. (2019) ‘Pc[a_n’m Ciahcncp_ D_p_fijg_hn[f Tb_ils: Clcnc][f R_pc_q’, Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3). doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84. Curtain, H. A. and Dahlberg, C. A. (2004) Languages and Children, Making the Match: New Languages for Young Learners. Pearson/A and B (New Languages for Young Learners: Grades K-8). Available at: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=L6thvwEACAAJ.C ase, R. (1993). Key elements of a global perspective. Social Education. Charlotte. (2014). English Language Learning for Early Childhood Children Versus Local Culture. Early Horizons. Cortazzi, M., & L., J. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching Asrianti et al (2022) 72 (pp. 196-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Carless, D. (2004) ‘Immo_m ch T_[]b_lm’ R_chn_ljl_n[ncih i` [ Task-B[m_^ Ihhip[ncih ch Plcg[ls S]biifm’, TESOL

163 Quarterly [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588283. Coleman, H. (2011) Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language. London: The British Council. Cijf[h^, F., G[lnih, S. [h^ Bolhm, A. (2014) ‘Cb[ff_ha_m ch Teaching English to Young Learners: Global P_lmj_]ncp_m [h^ Li][f R_[fcnc_m’, TESOL Qo[ln_lfs [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.148. Calder, S.D., Claessen, M., Ebbels, S.H., & Leitão, S. (2021). Running head: GRAMMAR INTERVENTION IN YOUNG CHILDREN WITH DLD. Carneiro Lucas, C.M. (2021). Teaching English to Young Learners: Second Language Acquisition or Foreign Language Learning? – A Case Study. World Journal of English Language. Chen, Y., & Yin, H. (2024). Research on the Application of Gamified Teaching in Primary School English Oral Teaching. SHS Web of Conferences. Csiha, T.N. (2022). With or without Parents? Language Learning in Early Childhood (Age of 4–6 Years). V[fi^o [jaop_: jli\fēg[m oh j_lmj_enīp[ : tchānhcmei l[emno elādogm = L[hao[a_ A]kocmcncih: Problems and Perspective : conference proceedings. Delgado, K.N., Parrales, E.M., & Villafuerte-Villafuerte, J.S. (2021). GAMIFICATION AND ARTISTIC DRAWING FOR IMPROVING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE

164 INSTRUCTION IN ECUADOR: MEANINGFUL ONLINE EDUCATION / GAMIFICACIÓN Y DIBUJO ARTÍSTICO PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO DE LA ENSEÑANZA DEL IDIOMA INGLÉS DE ECUADOR: EDUCACIÓN EN LÍNEA SIGNIFICATIVA. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. Domna, A., & Zafiri, M. (2018). A Case Study of Two Groups of A1 Level Students in English. Education and Linguistics Research. Davlatova Mukhsina Yendir qizi, Teshabayeva Dilfuza Muminovna. (2022). THE CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS IN TEACHING ENGLISH. Zenodo (Cern European Organization for Nuclear Research). doi:10.5281/zenodo.6758042 Dewi, NLPES (2012). Assessing Young Learners: It Is No Longer [ ‚Ncabng[l_.‛ Pl[mc. Dharmaningtias, D. S. (2013). Penghapusan Kebijakan Rintisan Sekolah Berstandar Internasional (RSBI). Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional, 4(2). D[pc_m, A., 2007, ‘Ihpifpcha Sno^_hnm ch Tb_ Cf[mmliig Amm_mmg_hn Pli]_mm’, ch D. R_p__m (_^.), Ahead of the Curve: The Power of Assessment to Transform Teaching and Learning, Solution Tree Press, Bloomington. E^gih^m, B., 1999, ‘C[jnolcha Si]c[f Eg\_^^_^h_mm: A Cihmnlo]ncpcmn Ajjli[]b’, Adaptive Behavior, 7(3–4), 323–347.

165 Danianne Mizzy. (2004). Learning and teaching through technology. College and Research Libraries News, 65(9), 508–509. doi:10.5860/crln.65.9.7312 Elias, S.M., Smith, W.L., & Barney, C.E. 2012. Age as a moderator of attitude towards technology in the workplace: work motivation and overall job satisfaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(5), pp. 453–467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.513419 Effcm, K., 2004, ‘Tb_ cgj[]n i` j_l]_cp_^ n_[]b_l ]ih`clg[ncih on receiver apprehension, motivancih, [h^ f_[lhcha’, Communication Education, 53(1).Faridatuunnisa, I. (2020). Policy and Implementation of English Language Learning for Elementary Schools in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Seminar. Eh_p_l, J. [h^ Miih, J. (2009) ‘N_q afi\[f ]ihn_xts for teaching Plcg[ls ELT: Cb[ha_ [h^ ]b[ff_ha_’, ch Yioha Learner English Language Policy and Implementation: International Perspectives. Facer, K. (2011). Learning Futures. Education, technology and social change. London: Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9780203817308 Fauzi, C., & Basikin. (2020). The Impact of the Whole Language Approach Towards Children Early Reading and Writing in English. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.141.07 Febrina, W. (2023). A Literature Review On The Use Of Songs In Teaching English To Young Learners: Benefits And

166 Difficulties. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional (JIPNAS). Fisher, S.J. (2016). The Use of Technology to Support Vocabulary Development of English Language Learners. Grant, B.M. (1977). Analyzing teacher nonverbal activity. Theory Into Practice, 16, 200-206. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. In Teachers College Press. Teachers College Press. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F.L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274 Gb[n[a_, M.. (2009) ‘Ihnli^o]ncih i` Ehafcmb `lig Gl[^_ 1 ch M[b[l[mbnl[, Ih^c[’, ch J. Eh_p_l, J. Miih, [h^ U. Raman (eds) Young Learner English Language Policy and Implementation: International Perspectives. Garnet Education, pp. 45–51. Gcg_h_t, T. (2009) ‘Ehafcmb [n Plcg[ls S]biif L_p_f ch Bl[tcf: Cb[ff_ha_m [h^ P_lmj_]ncp_m’, Yioha L_[lh_l Ehafcmb Language Policy and Implementation: International Perspectives [Preprint]. Ho, W.K. (2003) English language teaching in Asia today: An overview. Edited by W.K. Ho and R. Y. L. Wong. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press. Ho, Y. (2007) ‘Cbch[’m `il_cah f[hao[a_ jifc]s ih jlcg[ls Ehafcmb _^o][ncih: Wb[n’m \_bch^ cn?’, L[hao[a_ Pifc]s [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-

167 007-9052-9. Hamid, M. O., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Baldauf, R. B. (2013). Medium of instruction in Asia: Context, processes and outcomes. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.792130 H[gc^, Y. & M[bgii^, S., 2010, ‘Uh^_lmn[h^cha Cihmnlo]ncp_ Feedback: A Commitment between Teachers and Students for Academic and Professional D_p_fijg_hn’, Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 60(3). H[nnc_, J. & Tcgj_lf_s, H., 2007, ‘Tb_ Piq_l i` F__^\[]e’, Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. Hattie, J.A., 2009, Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, Routledge. Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. 1995. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Heda_m, H. (2014). Yioha ]bcf^l_h'm ‚qilecha nb_ilc_m‛: Building and connecting understandings. Journal of Early Childhood Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X13515417 Hutabarat, RGN (2020). English Language Learning for Elementary School Students from the Perspective of a Fun and Active Learning Approach: A Theoretical Reflection. Journal of Economics, Social & Humanities. Herman, B.C., Poor, S.V., Oertli, R.T., & Schulte, K. (2022). Pligincha Yioha L_[lh_lm’ NOS Vc_qm Tblioab

168 Place-Based SSI Instruction. Science & Education, 32, 947-992. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English Language teaching. London:Longman Harmer, J.(2007).The practice of English language teaching(4th ed). London:Longman Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511733031. Indriani, S., Pelita, U. & Karawaci, H.-L. 2016, ‘FOSTERING STUDENT PARTICIPATION THROUGH INTERACTIVE TEACHING IN BASIC ENGLISH CLASS’, Scholaria, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 92–9.Ibrahim, A.A., & Hamisu, M. (2019). Appraising Second Language Acquisition Theory and English Language Teaching and Learning in Nigeria. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, 7, 258-262. Islahuddin, M. (2023). Teaching English to Young Learners: A Literature Review. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. Ismail, N.M., Syahputri, V.N., & Irnanda, S. (2022). Gestures in Prolonging Semantic Memory of Young EFL Learners: A Serial Retention. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research. Imnck[g[b, I., B[[, S., & S[gnc^[l, S. (2023). TEACHERS’ NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION INFLUENCING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING ENGLISH FOR THE YOUNG LEARNERS. KLASIKAL : JOURNAL

169 OF EDUCATION, LANGUAGE TEACHING AND SCIENCE. Jessica, J. & S[hnimi, I. 2022, ‘HANDLING THE ATTENTION SPAN OF GRADE 1 STUDENTS AT EQUALBRIGHT SCHOOL’, PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 284–7. Kcls[eip[, G. (2022) ‘Eha[acha f_[lhcha ]ihn_hn `il ^cacn[f f_[lh_lm’, TEM Journal, pp. 1958–1964. doi:10.18421/tem114-65. Klein, Kerstin. (2005) ³ Teaching English Teaching Forum. Vol. 43. No. 1. Pages. 12 - 17. Washington DC,USA: United States Department of States. K_mm_flcha, T. [h^ Müff_l, U. (2011) ‘Tb_ ]ih]_jn i` _ai]_hnlcmg ch nb_ ]ihn_rn i` Pc[a_n’m nb_ils’, New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3), pp. 327–345. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008. Kingsview, P., 2021, The Effects of Peer Collaboration on Sno^_hnm’ Writing Skills and Their Attitude Towards Writing in a Hybrid Montessori Classroom of Second and Third Grade Students – PhD thesis, Saint Catherine University, Minessota . Khan, A.K., Wong, S., & Chen, M. (2023). role of task-based language teaching (TBLT) ch _hb[h]cha mno^_hnm’ speaking skills in English as a second language. Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning.

170 Kuchah, K. (2009) Early bilingualism in Cameroon: Where politics and education meet. Edited by J. Enever, J. Moon, and U. Raman. England: Garnet Education. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012) Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing, Language Teacher Education for a Global Society: A Modular Model for Knowing, Analyzing, Recognizing, Doing, and Seeing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832530. Lc, D. (1998) ‘‚In’m Afq[sm Mil_ Dc``c]ofn Tb[h Yio Pf[h [h^ Ig[ach_‛: T_[]b_lm’ P_l]_cp_^ Dc``c]ofnc_m ch Introducing the Communicative Approach in South Kor_[’, TESOL Qo[ln_lfs *Pl_jlchn+. Ap[cf[\f_ [n: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588000. Lcnnf_qii^, W. (2007) ‘Ciggohc][ncp_ [h^ n[me-based language n_[]bcha ch E[mn Amc[h ]f[mmliigm’, L[hao[a_ Teaching [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004363. L__, K., A\\inn, M.L., & Cb_h, N. (2020). Ih]l_[mcha Sno^_hnm’ Willingness to Communicate: Drama-Based Approaches to Language Instruction in English for Academic Purposes Classes. TESL Canada Journal. L__, K., A\\inn, M.L., & Cb_h, N. (2020). Ih]l_[mcha Sno^_hnm’ Willingness to Communicate: Drama-Based Approaches to Language Instruction in English for Academic Purposes Classes. TESL Canada Journal.

171 Li, H. (2023). The effect of VR on learners' engagement and motivation in K12 English education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. Lääh_g_nm, U. & Rimnipnm_p[, M., 2015, ‘D_p_fijcha Sojjilncp_ L_[lhcha Ehpclihg_hnm’, Journal of Psychology Research, 5(1). Leander, K., & Ehret, C. (2019). Afect in literacy teaching and learning: Pedagogies, politics, and coming to know. Routledge. Lco, M. & Hiha, M. 2021, ‘Ehafcmb L[hao[a_ Cf[mmliig Ahrc_ns [h^ Ehdisg_hn ch Cbch_m_ Yioha L_[lh_lm’, SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 4. Miftakh, F. (2017). Intercultural English Teaching and Learning To Young Learners. Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-5), 359–366. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/view/ 8049/6143 Moonti, U. [h^ G[hc, I.P. (2023) ‘Uncfct[ncih i` Dcacn[f L_[lhcha Media as Students Learning Alternative Sifoncih’, Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022), pp. 1354–1359. doi:10.2991/978-2- 494069-35-0_162. Marzano, R.J., Waters, T. & McNulty, B.A., 2005, School Leadership That Works: From Research To Results, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve, Virginia USA.Madya, S. (2013). Language Teaching Methodology From the Premethod Era to the

172 Postmethod Era. UNY Press. Mail, S.N. (2018). English in Primary Schools: Why it is Necessary and Why it is Questionable. Judika (Unsika Education Journal). Majid, A. (2013). Learning Planning: Developing Teacher Competency Standards. Rosdakarya. Masita, E. (2021). MULTICULTURALISM AND INTERCULTURALISM IN TEACHING ENGLISH IN INDONESIA. International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture. Mayesky, M. (2014). Creative Activities for Young Children. In Igarss 2014. Merryfield, M. M. (1997). Preparing teachers to teach global perspectives: A handbook for teacher educators. In A framework for teacher education in global perspectives. Muharoni, NA, Saputra, ER, & Indihadi, D. (2022). Best Practice for Teaching English in Elementary Schools. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Pedagogical Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v6i1.57737 Moon, Jayne. 2005. Teaching English to young learners:its benefit and its lack Richelson, Matt. 2010.Teaching Young Learners with Songs Masuram, J., & Sripada, P. N. (2020). Developing spoken fluency through task-based teaching. Procedia Computer Science, 172(2019),623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.080

173 Maming, K., Patahuddin, A, N., Sianna & Arsyad, N.A. 2023, ‘Jis`of L_[lhcha [m [ Wilnbqbcf_ Ihmnlo]ncih[f A]ncpcns for English Beginner Students in the Post Covid 19 P[h^_gc] El[’, Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, vol. 10, no. 1. M., V., M.R., B., Lamessa, O., & Manickam, R. (2023). Exploring Challenges of Dyslexic Students Learning English as a Second Language: Reading Drama Script. World Journal of English Language. Maisarah, Putri, T.H., Fauziyah, N., Saifuddin, M., Nurcahyani, D., N[dcb, A., & B[elc, B. (2023). T_[]b_lm’ Nih-Verbal Communication in Teaching English to Young Learners. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology. Nushi, M., Shafeie, S., & Shafiei, M. (2017). Game-based Teaching of Stress Placement on Multi-syllabic English Words. N[cg, W.S.R. 2019, ‘APPLICATION OF A JOYFUL LEARNING STRATEGY BASED ON HUMOR COMMUNICATION TO IMPROVE THE INTERESTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF LEARNING ENGLISH’, EDUVELOP, vol. 3, no. 1. N_qjiln, E.L. 2020, ‘Cbcf^l_h [h^ A^ofnm [m L[hao[a_ L_[lh_lm: Rof_m, V[lc[ncih, [h^ M[nol[ncih[f Cb[ha_’, Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 153–69. Noh[h, D. 2010, ‘T_[]bcha Ehafcmb ni Yioha L_[lh_lm.’, Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning.Pinter, A (2006). Teaching English to young learners. NY : Oxford University Press

174 Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, no. 1, hh. 1–12. Nordlund, M., & Norberg, C. 2020. Vocabulary in EFL teaching materials for young learners. International Journal of Language Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, hh. 89-116. Nurasiah. (2017). Teaching English to Young Learners: A Case Study at Nurul Quran Islamic School Aceh Besar. English Education Journal (EJJ). Nazara, P. (2019). Learning Vocabularies Using Short Stories at Primary School: Students‟ Perception. JET (Journal of English Teaching), vol. 5 no.3, hh. 157-165. Nunan, D. (2004) Task-Based Language Teaching. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667336. Nunan, D. (2003a) Practical English Language Teaching, vocabulary. Mc Graw-Hill. Noh[h, D. (2003\) ‘Tb_ Igj[]n i` Ehafcmb [m [ Global Language on Educational Policies and Practices in the AsiaP[]c`c] R_acih’, TESOL Qo[ln_lfs *Pl_jlchn+. Ap[cf[\f_ at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214. Nol, C. (2003) ‘Ehafcmb f[hao[a_ n_[]bcha ch Ih^ih_mc[: Changing policies and practical constraintm’, ch W. K. Ho & R. Y. L. Wong (ed.) English language teaching in east Asia today: Changing policies and practices. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, pp. 163–172. On-lai, A.L. (1994). The Variety and Effectiveness of Strategies Employed in Vocabulary Explanations in EFL Classrooms in Hong Kong.

175 Özer, D., Karadöller, D. Z., Özyürek, A., & Göksun, T. (2023). Gestures cued by demonstratives in speech guide listeners' visual attention during spatial language comprehension. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 152(9), 2623–2635. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001402 Qorya, L., & Styati Widiyani, E 2023. The Use of Music in English Listening for Young Learners. Octaviana, DW (2017). TEACHING ENGLISH TO YOUNG LEARNERS. ENGLISH EDUCATION: JOURNAL OF ENGLISH TEACHING AND RESEARCH. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v2i2.808 Oktavia, D., Habibah, N., Balti, L., & Kurniawan, R. (2023). INDEPENDENT CURRICULUM AND ENGLISH TEACHING IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS: NEED ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY. Muara Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v8i1.1260 Oktavia, D., & Lestari, R. (2022). Students' Perception on Learning Speaking English by Using English Domino Games: The Case of a Private University. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 1, 28–42. Og_l & A\^ofl[bcg, 2017, ‘Tb_ Clcn_lc[ i` Cihmnlo]ncp_ F__^\[]e: Tb_ F__^\[]e nb[n Ciohnm’, The Journal of Health Specialities, 5(1), 45–48. Ot_l_g, A. & Aeeisohfo, B., 2015, ‘Öğl_hg_ mncff_lch_ ail_ n[m[lf[h[h öğl_hg_ iln[gf[lı p_ gatematik \[ş[lımıh[ _necmc’, Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(61), 61–80.

176 Pold[s[hnc, A., 2012, ‘Sncgof[ncha Pimcncp_ Ehafcmb Sj_[echa Cf[mm Ehpclihg_hn’, 2(2).Puspita, Y., Hanum, F., Rohman, A., Fitriana, F., & Akhyar, Y. (2022). The Influence of Family Environmental Factors on the Development of First Language Acquisition in Children Aged 2 Years 5 Months. Journal of Obsession: Journal of Early Childhood Education. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2500Rufus, T. Z. (2019). Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia (Pros and Cons). English Language in Focus (ELIF). https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.1.1.65-70 Pan, M.X., & Hu, G. (2022). Effectiveness of a CL-informed approach to English preposition acquisition by young Chinese learners. Cognitive Linguistic Studies. Piaget, J.I. (2014). CONSTRUCTIVISM & STUDENT CENTERED LEARNING 3. JEAN PIAGET’S THEORY OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT 3.1. Introduction. Picciuolo, M. (2023). Reconceptualising Space in Academic Lectures: Face-to-Face, Blended and Online Lecturer Discourse in the Context of English-Medium Instruction. ESP Today. Prof. Namrata Ganesh Malbari. (2022). ONLINE TEACHING AND LEARNING: BENEFITS AND LIMITATION. Zenodo (Cern European Organization for Nuclear Research). doi:10.5281/zenodo.7267971 Pransiska, R. (2017). Benefits of Bilingualism in Early Childhood: A Booster of Teaching English to Young Learners.

177 Pradono, S., Astriani, M.S. & Moniaga, ; Jurike 2013, A METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING, International Journal of Communication & Information Technology (CommIT). Prasetya, H. (2019). The Effect of Using Cross Culture Uh^_lmn[h^cha (CCU) M[n_lc[f ih Tb_ Sno^_hn’m Speaking Ability at SMA Negeri 1 Terusan Nunyai Central Lampung [State Institute for Islamic Studies of Metro]. https://repository.metrouniv.ac.id/id/eprint/700/ Pl[s[nhc, I. 2019, ‘TEACHING ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS’, Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 2. Rahmadhania, S.N., Chaerul, A. & Ahmad, Y.B. 2022, ‘Erjfilcha Sno^_hnm’ Erj_lc_h]_s of Story Telling Technique in English Speaking Learning in Junior Hcab S]biif’, Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 1. Rebok, G.W., Smith, C.B., Pascualvaca, D.M., Mirsky, A.F., Ahnbihs, B.J. & K_ff[g, S.G. 1997, ‘D_p_fijg_hn[f changes in attentional performance in urban children `lig _cabn ni nbcln__h s_[lm’, Child Neuropsychology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–46. Ro``, H.A. & C[jittifc, M.C. 2003, ‘D_p_fijg_hn i` Ann_hncih [h^ Dcmnl[]nc\cfcns ch nb_ Fclmn 4 Y_[lm i` Lc`_’, Developmental Psychology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 877–90. Richards, JC, & Renandya, WA (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.

178 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667 190 Rixon, S. (2013). British Council survey of policy and practice in primary English language teaching worldwide. Retrieved from www.britishcouncil.org Ratminingsih, N. M., Mahadewi, L. P. P., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2018). ICT-\[m_^ chn_l[]ncp_ a[g_ ch TEYL: T_[]b_lm’ j_l]_jncih, mno^_hnm’ gincp[ncih, and achievement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8170 Rich, S. (2014). Taking Stock: Where Are We Now with TEYL? In International Perspectives on Teaching English to Young Learners. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023230_1 Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with differentpersonality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725 R[g[hc, S. & Kl[]eip, S.K., 2012, ‘Tq_fp_ ncjm `il acpcha `__^\[]e _``_]ncp_fs ch nb_ ]fchc][f _hpclihg_hn’, Medical Teacher, 34(10), 787–791. Radfort, Andrew 2009. linguistic: an introduction second addition 2009. Cambridge: University press. Rahmawati, W. K. et al. (2023) ‘Tb_ E``_]n i` ‚Pl_m_hn[ncih, Pl[]nc]_, Pli^o]ncih’’(PPP) M_nbi^ ih Sno^_hn Speaking Skill by Using Power Point at XI MIPA Gl[^_’, Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(6), pp.

179 626–634. Seppo Sirkemaa, & Heidi Varpelaide. (2018). The Need for Digital Learning Environments. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17, 167–181. doi:10.26803/ijlter.17.6.11 Santrock, J. W. (2011) Child Development. McGraw Hill. S. M. Zoltek. (2016). Learning through teaching: An online setting. Innovations in Teaching and Learning Conference Proceedings, 8, 2-. doi:10.13021/g8qg7mScott, W. A. & Ytreberg L. H. (1990). Teaching English to Children. London New York: Longman Sosiowati, I Gusti Ayu Gede. (2003).The Challenge of Teaching Young Learners. Paper presented at the TEFL Conference, Bali, Indonesia. Scott, W., Ytreberg, L. (1990).Teaching English to Children. Longman. S[figih, G., 2006, ‘Tb_ Ssmn_g[nc] pm. Ah[fsnc] Sno^s i` Cigjf_r L_[lhcha Ehpclihg_hnm’, ch J. Ef_h & R. Clark (eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research, pp. 255–264, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Schaaf, M. van der, Baartman, L., Prins, F., Oosterbaan, A. & S]b[[j, H., 2013, ‘F__^\[]e Dc[fiao_m Tb[n Sncgof[n_ Sno^_hnm’ R_`f_]ncp_ Tbchecha’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 227–245. Sbon_, V.J., 2008, ‘Fi]om ih Filg[ncp_ F__^\[]e’, Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

180 Sidelinger, R.J. & Booth-Bonn_l`c_f^, M., 2010, ‘Ci-constructing Student Involvement: An Examination of Teacher Confirmation and Student-to-Student Connectedness ch nb_ Ciff_a_ Cf[mmliig’, Communication Education, 59(2), 165–184. Snowman, J. & Biehler, R.F., 2003, Psychology Applied to Teaching, Houghton Mifflin.Supriyanti, N. (2012). Challenges in Providing Trainings for English Teachers of Elementary Schools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v6i3.159 Supriyanti, N. (2012). Challenges in providing trainings for English teachers of elementary schools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 6(3), 161-166. Scott, W. A., & Ytreberg, L. H. (1993). Teaching English to Children. Longman. Suardi, M., Kurniawati, L., & Rachmawati, Y. (2021). Curiosity in Young Children. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210322.048 Sukyadi, D. (2015). The teaching of English at secondary schools in Indonesia. In Secondary School English Education in Asia: From policy to practice. Tekin, S., & Baykara, T. (2023). Teaching English to Young Learners: Combining Theory and Practice through Practicum in Pre-service Teacher Education. *Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning*, 5. doi:10.51535/tell.1310265.

181 T[nfıfıiğfo, K., & S_h]bsfi-T[nfıfıiğfo, N. (2021). LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AT EARLY CHILDHOOD: AN OVERVIEW IN THE CONTEXT OF PSYCHOLINGUISTICS. Psycholinguistics in a Modern World. Tekin, S., & Baykara, T. (2023). Teaching English to Young Learners: Combining Theory and Practice through Practicum in Pre-service Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning. Thu, N.T. (2022). INCORPORATING THE ‚DIZI GUI‛ INTO EFL CLASSROOMS FOR YOUNG LEARNERS: A STUDY ON SELF-REGULATION IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. European Journal of English Language Teaching. Vi_fef, K.E., 2012, ‘S]biif I^_hnc`c][ncih’, Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 193–218, Springer US, Boston, MA. Vadivel, B., Shaban, A.A., Ahmed, Z.A., & Saravanan, B. (2023). Unlocking English Proficiency: Assessing the Influence of AI-Powered Language Learning Apps on Young Learners' Language Acquisition. International Journal of English Language, Education and Literature Studies (IJEEL). Velanitta, V. (2020). LANGUAGE PERCEPTION AND LANGUAGE PRODUCTION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD: LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 19-27. Wang, Y. (2023). Assessing spoken English proficiency for biotechnology research collaboration in a globalized

182 world. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. Wadsworth, B. J. (1979) Pc[a_n’m nb_ils i` ]iahcncp_ development : an introduction for students of psychology and education. 2d ed, TA - TT -. 2d ed. New York SE - xvi, 189 pages : illustrations ; 21 cm: Longman. doi: LK - https://worldcat.org/title/4857913. Wadsworth, B. J. (1996) Pc[a_n’m Tb_ils i` Ciahcncp_ [h^ Affective Development: Foundations of Constructivism. Longman. Wilson, B.G., 1995, Maintaining the Ties Between Learning Theory and Instructional Design, The American Educational Research Association. Xu, T., Cui, F., & Zhang, B. (2022). Challenges in the Use of Logical Connectors for EFL Learners: Frequency, Variety, Suitability, and Improper Use with Pedagogical Implications. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. Xodabande, I., & Boroughani, T. (2023). Mobile-assisted focus on forms in English for academic purposes instruction: Investigating the impacts on learning academic words. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1071555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071555 Yunita, W., Abdullah, F., Mellan, M., Hidayati, A.N., & Ardi, H. (2022). M[h[acha Ehafcmb Yioha L_[lh_lm’ Cf[mmliig Activities through Gestures: A Multimodal Perspective. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.

183 Y[mcl, G.M., Ah^f__\, N. & Adg[f, M., 2023, ‘Ah[fstcha nb_ Rif_ of a Supportive Classroom Environment through Effective Feedback at Ghazi University Dera Ghazi Kb[h’, Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 241–253. Yufaraj, A. (2009). Age Factor and Its Implications for Teaching English to Young Learners. MIJALI Published Journal, 350–359. Zulhermindra & R[bg[q[nc 2017, ‘Ah Ah[fsmcm i` L_mmih Pf[hm Written by English Student-Teachers for Young L_[lh_lm’, T[’^c\, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39–50.Zheng, Y., & Peng, J. (2022). ELAN (EUDICO Linguistic Annotator). RELC Journal, 53, 469 - 474 Zein, MS (2017). Elementary English education in Indonesia: Policy developments, current practices, and future prospects. EnglishToday. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078416000407 Zimmerman, F.J., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J.A., Christakis, D.A., Xu, D., Gray, S., & Yapanel, U. (2009). Teaching by listening: The importance of adult-child conversations to language development. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2267

184 About Authors Warni Dominggus Sulu, S.Pd As a devoted academician and educator, my fervent commitment lies in the realm of English language education and pedagogy, propelled by an unwavering dedication to scholarly rigor and an insatiable quest for enlightenment. I eagerly anticipate engaging in various writing endeavors aimed at disseminating knowledge and fostering inspiration among diverse audiences. My scholarly pursuits gravitate towards research areas encompassing English education, pedagogical methodologies, and the promotion of inclusive educational practices. Suci Apriani is an English teacher at a private vocational high school for broadcasting at Bina Creative Medan. She previously taught at SMAS 2 Muhammadiyah Medan in 2019; was a foreign language coach at SMA Adzkia Medan from 2020 to 2021; served as an English tutor at the Education Laboratory

185 (EDULAB) Medan in 2020; and was a private tutor at Nobel Course Specialist Private Medan from 2020 to 2022. She has been involved in several internal and external campus organizations since her undergraduate studies. Suci was born in the village of Silau Jawa (North Sumatra) on April 27, 1997, and graduated from the State University of Medan (UNIMED), class of 2015. Currently, Suci is pursuing her master's degree in English education at Yogyakarta State University (UNY). Suci actively writes book chapters in collaboration with fellow collaborators from Pena Muda Media. The author is also active in two organizations: as the interim a_h_l[f m_]l_n[ls `il nb_ Ammi]c[ncih i` M[mn_l’m [h^ Doctoral Students (KMMD UNY) and as the head of the public relations division at the Kelurahan BPI UNY. She is an awardee of a scholarship for teachers and educational staff (GTK) from the Indonesia Education Scholarship (BPI) in 2022. Amalia Eka Brillianti was born in Jakarta on December 7, 2000. She is pursuing her g[mn_l’m ^_al__ [n Uhcp_lmcn[m N_a_lc Yogyakarta and is enrolled in English Language Education. Her areas of interest include linguistics, literature, and language education, especially speaking skills. This is not her very first book. There are two

186 previous books successfully published. The first work in the chapter "Personality and Values" in his "Organizational Behavior" book was published in July 2023. Her second book was published in Februars 2024 [m ‚L_[^_lmbcj ch Ehafcmb L[hao[a_ T_[]bcha.‛ Tb_ [onbil bij_m bcm m_]ih^ work will be useful for all readers of this book. Wini Ranti is the founder of QECE (Qur'an & English CEnter) course and an English teacher at Madrasah Aliyah Bengkulu Tengah. The author was born in Pondok Kubang on February 13 1999. The author's educational history was MIN Pondok Kubang/MIN 1 Central Bengkulu in 2004, MTs. Qaryatul Jihad Pondok Kubang in 2010, SMAN 09 Kota Bengkulu 2013. In 2016, the author continued her undergraduate education at UIN Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu majoring in English Education. Apart from actively doing school/college assignments, the author is active in various religious and educational activities at Ma'had Al-Jami'ah UINFAS Bengkulu. The author also actively participates in social activities in the fields of education, disasters, etc. The author has participated in volunteer activities in several districts in Bengkulu, Riau, East Java and Lombok. Currently, the author is pursuing postgraduate study at the Universitas Negeri

187 Malang with Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) scholarship. Fadhilanisa Salsabila was born in Samarinda, East Kalimantan province on 09 December 2000. The author is an alumnus of the Bachelor of English Education at Brawijaya University (UB) and is currently pursuing a Postgraduate Diploma in English Education at Yogyakarta State University (UNY). The author is a recipient of the Kaltim Tuntas Scholarship since her undergraduate studies and continued to the Master level, which is specifically for student from East Kalimantan. Aside from writing, she enjoys singing, traditional dancing, and exploring coffee. Her hobbies since she was in elementary school have made her win several singing and dancing competitions at the provincial and faculty levels. Readers should not hesitate to greet and get acquainted with the author because the author is very friendly and active in using social media. The Readers can reach out the author via her Instagram social media account @dhilaafsss_ and Gmail, [email protected] The author's name is Inayatur Robbaniyah, a woman from Banyuwangi Regency. The author completed his final education in the Early Childhood Education Program at the State University of Malang, State of Malang.

188 Over the last few years, the author has been active in writing several of his works, namely the article The Effect of Educational Qualifications and Teacher Professional Education Program on the Digital Literacy Skills of Early Childhood Educators which was published in Sinta 2, reviewing the book Latina students' experiences in public schools which was published in Children Geographies Journal. Noviyanti is an enthusiastic and accomplished English teacher. She is enrolled at Universitas Negeri Yias[e[ln[ ni jolmo_ [ g[mn_l’m degree in English education. She constantly seeks to demonstrate her dedication to developing her knowledge and teaching skills. Teaching English to young learners represents one of her main abilities. Her background in teaching children aids in her comprehension of the many approaches and techniques that work well for young language learners. Munirotul Fatimah, S. Pd. who was born in Palembang on August 9 2000, a M[mn_l’m mno^_hn qbi cm ]urrently pursuing a Master in English Education at Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta after