ANNEX Q #1 Work Performance Name of Personnel : _________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Absence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and Non-Compliance to Program Deliverables >2 Incidences of Late Submission, >2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, >1 Incidence of No Submission OR >1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1-2 Incidences of Late Submission, 1-2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, 1 Incidence of No Submission OR 1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, 1 Incidence of Incomplete Submission, Zero Incidence of No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, Zero Incidence of Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Zero Incidence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Provision of Administrative Support or Technical Support No Administrative or Technical Support Provided to internal or external clients Administrative or Technical Support provided but with minor contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided still needs major improvement. Administrative or Technical Support provided with minor to moderate contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but still can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role or contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role / contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is very satisfactory and may be showcase as a good example to others. Strategic and Critical Response Absence of initiative on this area Gathers and analyzes data/information and plans to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns. Not yet implemented. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, results were not noticeable yet. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, yet only minor results were noticeable. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented effectively. Very satisfactory results were very evident. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __ Immediate Supervisor __DC __ADC #2 Behavioral Name of Personnel : __________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Commitment to Ethical Standards and Good Governance Commitment of unethical practices which required major damage control by the department or office where he/she belongs presence of one or minor act sans of ethical standards and good governance Have demonstrated a fair observation of ethical standards and good governance. Have most of the time displayed behaviour that is consistent to high ethical standards and good governance Have consistently displayed behaviour that is consistent to high ethical standards and good governance Respectful and Courteous to supervisors, peers, subordinates and clients consistently is disrespectful or not courteous to supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients have 1 - 2 incidences where discourtesy and disrespectfulness cause a rift in the working environment he/she belongs Have sometimes been respectful and courteous to select supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients Have most of the time been respectful and courteous to all supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients Have always been respectful and courteous to all supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients -0- Criteria Point Score Rating BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 1 BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 1 Criteria Point Score Rating 95
Organizational Sensitivity no clear manifestation of behaviour on organizational sensitivity there is the intention but no clear manifestation of protecting the good image of the Department or office where he/she belongs. Minor incidence of bad publicity for the department or office happened but was resolved after some time. have most of the time been careful in words and actions so as not to put the department or the office in the bad limelight Minor incidence of bad publicity for the dept or office happened but was immediately resolved. have most of the time been careful in words and actions so as not to put the department or the office in the bad limelight An incidence of bad publicity may happen but was immediately stopped. have always been very careful in words and actions so as not to put the department or the office in the bad limelight; Zero incidence of bad publicity for the dept or office happened Commitment, and Responsiveness Behaviour not observed Intention to be relevant is manifested though no significant result is observed. Commitment to compliance of deliverables have been displayed sometimes; Strategies adopted for the effective implementation of the department PPAs were sometimes grounded and relevant. Clients may show satisfactory to very satisfactory rating to his/her dealings, suggestions and interventions. Commitment to compliance of deliverables have been displayed most of the time; Strategies adopted for the effective implementation of the department PPAs were most of the time grounded and relevant. Clients most of the time showed very satisfactory rating to his/her dealings, suggestions and interventions. Commitment to compliance of deliverables have been consistently displayed; Strategies adopted for the effective implementation of the department PPAs were grounded and relevant all the time. Clients always showed very satisfactory rating to his/her dealings, suggestions and interventions. Resourceful and Dependable Behaviour not observed establishment of partnership is on the pipeline to facilitate implementatiion of various department PPAs Zero initiative yet implemented with partnership established Various department PPAs and intiatives were implemented due to strong support of clients and partners; 1 to 2 initiatives implemented with partnership established Minimal to No funds from the office is utilized; Various department PPAs and intiatives were implemented due to strong support of clients and partners; 3 to 5 initiatives implemented with partnership established Minimal to No funds from the office is utilized; Various department PPAs and intiatives were smoothly implemented due to strong support of clients and partners; More than 5 initiatives implemented with partnership established Minimal to No funds from the office is utilized; Ability to maintain good working relations with clients, partners and organic personnel Behaviour not observed Seldom maintained a good working relation with clients, partners and/or organic personnel >1 reported incidence of conflict, most are not yet resolved Sometimes maintained a good working relation with clients, partners and/or organic personnel 1 reported incidence of conflict but not yet resolved Have most of the time maintained good working relations with clients, partners and/or organic personnel Minor reported incidence of conflict but were patched up immediately or there is an initiative to patch up the conflict. Have consistently maintained good working relations with clients, partners and/or organic personnel No reported incidence of conflict Punctuality in Submission of Reports Behaviour not observed Instance of late submission ; OR sometimes quality of report is questionable Submits reports on time with minor data missing Submits reports on time and complete, but sometimes require data verification Submits reports on time and complete, and without need for follow-up, data verification or reminder 96
Team Player Behaviour not observed the following behaviours are seldom observed : Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or co workers; and work out for winwin solutions occurence of 2 or more stubornness cases the following behaviours are observed sometimes : Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or co workers; and work out for winwin solutions minor incidence of stubornness maybe observed the following behaviours are observed most of the time : Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or co workers; and work out for winwin solutions Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or coworkers and work out for win-win solutions: above behaviours are observed consistently. Self Control and Ability to Manage Criticism Behaviour not observed most of the time unable to restrain one's emotions, desires, or impulses which lead to making unpleasant scene and sometimes constraining relationships can manage one's temper sometimes; can fairly handle constructive criticism with good command of one self and show openness to constructive criticism in most of the times with good command of one self and show openness to constructive criticism at all times Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __ Immediate Supervisor __DC __ADC __Peer Add’l Rater* : __ Internal Client (3) *for validation #3 Innovations Name of Personnel : ______________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 1 Criteria Point Score Rating 97
Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member #4 Awards Name of Personnel : _________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for office to achieve Recognition from Central Office and other agencies informed concerned office about the awards or requirements but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed concerned office about the details of the awards or requirements informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Proposed action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. More than 2 of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 10 but short of Top 5 informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. Almost all of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 5 Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 1 -0- -0- Rating Point Score Criteria 98
ANNEX R #1 Work Performance Name of Personnel : ___________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Absence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and Non-Compliance to Program Deliverables >2 Incidences of Late Submission, >2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, >1 Incidence of No Submission OR >1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1-2 Incidences of Late Submission, 1-2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, 1 Incidence of No Submission OR 1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, 1 Incidence of Incomplete Submission, Zero Incidence of No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, Zero Incidence of Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Zero Incidence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Provision of Administrative Support or Technical Support No Administrative or Technical Support Provided to internal or external clients Administrative or Technical Support provided but with minor contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided still needs major improvement. Administrative or Technical Support provided with minor to moderate contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but still can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role or contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role / contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is very satisfactory and may be showcase as a good example to others. Strategic and Critical Response Absence of initiative on this area Gathers and analyzes data/information and plans to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns. Not yet implemented. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, results were not noticeable yet. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, yet only minor results were noticeable. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented effectively. Very satisfactory results were very evident. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __DC __ADC #2 Behavioral Name of Personnel : __________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Commitment to Ethical Standards and Good Governance with unethical practices which required major damage control by the department or office where he/she belongs presence of one or minor act sans of ethical standards and good governance Have demonstrated a fair observation of ethical standards and good governance. Have most of the time displayed behaviour that is consistent to high ethical standards and good governance Have consistently displayed behaviour that is consistent to high ethical standards and good governance Respectful and Courteous to supervisors, peers, subordinates and clients consistently is disrespectful or not courteous to supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients have 1 - 2 incidences where discourtesy and disrespectfulness cause a rift in the working environment he/she belongs Have sometimes been respectful and courteous to select supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients Have most of the time been respectful and courteous to all supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients Have always been respectful and courteous to all supervisors, peers, subordinates and/or clients -0- Criteria Point Score Rating BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 2 BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 2 Criteria Point Score Rating 99
Organizational Sensitivity no clear manifestation of behaviour on organizational sensitivity there is the intention but no clear manifestation of protecting the good image of the Department or office where he/she belongs. Minor incidence of bad publicity for the department or office happened but was resolved after some time. have most of the time been careful in words and actions so as not to put the department or the office in the bad limelight Minor incidence of bad publicity for the dept or office happened but was immediately resolved. have most of the time been careful in words and actions so as not to put the department or the office in the bad limelight An incidence of bad publicity may happen but was immediately stopped. have always been very careful in words and actions so as not to put the department or the office in the bad limelight; Zero incidence of bad publicity for the dept or office happened Commitment, and Responsiveness Behaviour not observed Intention to be relevant is manifested though no significant result is observed. Commitment to compliance of deliverables have been displayed sometimes; Strategies adopted for the effective implementation of the department PPAs were sometimes grounded and relevant. Clients may show satisfactory to very satisfactory rating to his/her dealings, suggestions and interventions. Commitment to compliance of deliverables have been displayed most of the time; Strategies adopted for the effective implementation of the department PPAs were most of the time grounded and relevant. Clients most of the time showed very satisfactory rating to his/her dealings, suggestions and interventions. Commitment to compliance of deliverables have been consistently displayed; Strategies adopted for the effective implementation of the department PPAs were grounded and relevant all the time. Clients always showed very satisfactory rating to his/her dealings, suggestions and interventions. Resourceful and Dependable Behaviour not observed establishment of partnership is on the pipeline to facilitate implementatiion of various department PPAs Zero initiative yet implemented with partnership established Various department PPAs and intiatives were implemented due to strong support of clients and partners; 1 to 2 initiatives implemented with partnership established Minimal to No funds from the office is utilized; Various department PPAs and intiatives were implemented due to strong support of clients and partners; 3 to 5 initiatives implemented with partnership established Minimal to No funds from the office is utilized; Various department PPAs and intiatives were smoothly implemented due to strong support of clients and partners; More than 5 initiatives implemented with partnership established Minimal to No funds from the office is utilized; Ability to maintain good working relations with clients, partners and organic personnel Behaviour not observed Seldom maintained a good working relation with clients, partners and/or organic personnel >1 reported incidence of conflict, most are not yet resolved Sometimes maintained a good working relation with clients, partners and/or organic personnel 1 reported incidence of conflict but not yet resolved Have most of the time maintained good working relations with clients, partners and/or organic personnel Minor reported incidence of conflict but were patched up immediately or there is an initiative to patch up the conflict. Have consistently maintained good working relations with clients, partners and/or organic personnel No reported incidence of conflict Punctuality in Submission of Reports Behaviour not observed Instance of late submission ; OR sometimes quality of report is questionable Submits reports on time with minor data missing Submits reports on time and complete, but sometimes require data verification Submits reports on time and complete, and without need for follow-up, data verification or reminder 100
Team Player Behaviour not observed the following behaviours are seldom observed : Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or co workers; and work out for winwin solutions occurence of 2 or more stubornness cases the following behaviours are observed sometimes : Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or co workers; and work out for winwin solutions minor incidence of stubornness maybe observed the following behaviours are observed most of the time : Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or co workers; and work out for winwin solutions Takes the lead when needed; able to share leadership with his/her team; open to suggestions; hear out supervisors and/or coworkers and work out for win-win solutions: above behaviours are observed consistently. Self Control and Ability to Manage Criticism Behaviour not observed most of the time unable to restrain one's emotions, desires, or impulses which lead to making unpleasant scene and sometimes constraining relationships can manage one's temper sometimes; can fairly handle constructive criticism with good command of one self and show openness to constructive criticism in most of the times with good command of one self and show openness to constructive criticism at all times Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __DC __ADC __Peer and/or subordinates Add’l Rater* : __ Internal Client (3) *for validation #3 Innovations Name of Personnel : _________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 2 Criteria Point Score Rating 101
Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member #4 Awards Name of Personnel : ________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for office to achieve Recognition from Central Office and other agencies informed concerned office about the awards or requirements but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed concerned office about the details of the awards or requirements informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Proposed action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. More than 2 of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 10 but short of Top 5 informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. Almost all of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 5 Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Administrative Level 2 -0- -0- Rating Point Score Criteria 102
ANNEX S #1 Innovations Name of Cluster Team : __________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Cluster Team Criteria Point Score Rating -0- 103
#2 Awards Name of Cluster Team : __________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for LGUs to achieve LG Audits Ideal or High Functionality and/ or Compliance ie. FDP/SGFH, ADAC Audit, POC Audit, etc informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. FOR GROUP : <5% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. FOR GROUP : at least 10% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. FOR GROUP : >20%- 49% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. LGU gained moderate functionality or compliance level. FOR GROUP : at least 50% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. Almost all of the action items were completed. LGU gained high functionality or compliance level. FOR GROUP: >50% of component LGUs have high functionality or compliance level Facilitation for LGUs to achieve the SGLG informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. FOR GROUP : <5% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. FOR GROUP : at least 10% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. At least 2 of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan. LGU is recognized as POTENTIAL SGLG Passer - National Level or National Finalist. FOR GROUP : >20%- 49% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. More than 2 of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan. LGU is recognized as FINALIST SGLG Passer - National Level. FOR GROUP : at least 50% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. Almost all of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan LGU is recognized as SGLG Passer - National Level. FOR GROUP: at least >50% of component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level Facilitation for LGUs to achieve other agencies Local Governance Audit, i.e., CFLGA, etc. informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 1 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member -0- Criteria Point Score Rating BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Cluster Team 104
ANNEX T.1 #1 Work Performance Name of Division : ____________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Absence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and Non-Compliance to Program Deliverables >2 Incidences of Late Submission, >2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, >1 Incidence of No Submission OR >1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1-2 Incidences of Late Submission, 1-2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, 1 Incidence of No Submission OR 1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, 1 Incidence of Incomplete Submission, Zero Incidence of No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, Zero Incidence of Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Zero Incidence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Provision of Administrative Support or Technical Support No Administrative or Technical Support Provided to internal or external clients Administrative or Technical Support provided but with minor contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided still needs major improvement. Administrative or Technical Support provided with minor to moderate contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but still can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role or contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role / contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is very satisfactory and may be showcase as a good example to others. Strategic and Critical Response Absence of initiative on this area Gathers and analyzes data/information and plans to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns. Not yet implemented. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, results were not noticeable yet. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, yet only minor results were noticeable. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented effectively. Very satisfactory results were very evident. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __ PD __CH __PFP __PM __ARD __RD -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for FAD Division @ Region Criteria Point Score Rating 105
#2 Innovations Name of Division : ______________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member Criteria Point Score Rating -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for FAD Division @ Region 106
#3 Awards Name of Division : ____________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for office to achieve Recognition from Central Office and other agencies informed concerned office about the awards or requirements but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed concerned office about the details of the awards or requirements informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Proposed action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. More than 2 of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 10 but short of Top 5 informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. Almost all of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 5 Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member -0- Criteria Point Score Rating BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for FAD Division @ Region 107
ANNEX T.2 #1 Work Performance Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Absence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and Non-Compliance to Program Deliverables >2 Incidences of Late Submission, >2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, >1 Incidence of No Submission OR >1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1-2 Incidences of Late Submission, 1-2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, 1 Incidence of No Submission OR 1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, 1 Incidence of Incomplete Submission, Zero Incidence of No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, Zero Incidence of Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Zero Incidence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Provision of Administrative Support or Technical Support No Administrative or Technical Support Provided to internal or external clients Administrative or Technical Support provided but with minor contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided still needs major improvement. Administrative or Technical Support provided with minor to moderate contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but still can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role or contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role / contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is very satisfactory and may be showcase as a good example to others. Strategic and Critical Response Absence of initiative on this area Gathers and analyzes data/information and plans to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns. Not yet implemented. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, results were not noticeable yet. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, yet only minor results were noticeable. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented effectively. Very satisfactory results were very evident. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __ PD __CH __PFP __PM __ARD __RD -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for LGMED Division @ Region Criteria Point Score Rating 108
#2 Innovations Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member Criteria Point Score Rating -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for LGMED Division @ Region 109
#3 Awards Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for LGUs to achieve LG Audits Ideal or High Functionality and/ or Compliance ie. FDP/SGFH, ADAC Audit, POC Audit, etc informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. FOR GROUP : <5% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. FOR GROUP : at least 10% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. FOR GROUP : >20%- 49% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. LGU gained moderate functionality or compliance level. FOR GROUP : at least 50% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. Almost all of the action items were completed. LGU gained high functionality or compliance level. FOR GROUP: >50% of component LGUs have high functionality or compliance level 30% Facilitation for LGUs to achieve the SGLG informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. FOR GROUP : <5% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. FOR GROUP : at least 10% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. At least 2 of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan. LGU is recognized as POTENTIAL SGLG Passer - National Level or National Finalist. FOR GROUP : >20%- 49% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. More than 2 of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan. LGU is recognized as FINALIST SGLG Passer - National Level. FOR GROUP : at least 50% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. Almost all of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan LGU is recognized as SGLG Passer - National Level. FOR GROUP: at least >50% of component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level 40% Facilitation for LGUs to achieve other agencies Local Governance Audit, i.e., CFLGA, Gawad Kalasag, etc. informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 1 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. 30% Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member -0- Criteria Point Score Rating BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for LGMED Division @ Region 110
ANNEX T.3 #1 Work Performance Name of Division : ______________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Absence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and Non-Compliance to Program Deliverables >2 Incidences of Late Submission, >2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, >1 Incidence of No Submission OR >1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1-2 Incidences of Late Submission, 1-2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, 1 Incidence of No Submission OR 1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, 1 Incidence of Incomplete Submission, Zero Incidence of No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, Zero Incidence of Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Zero Incidence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Provision of Administrative Support or Technical Support No Administrative or Technical Support Provided to internal or external clients Administrative or Technical Support provided but with minor contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided still needs major improvement. Administrative or Technical Support provided with minor to moderate contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but still can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role or contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role / contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is very satisfactory and may be showcase as a good example to others. Strategic and Critical Response Absence of initiative on this area Gathers and analyzes data/information and plans to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns. Not yet implemented. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, results were not noticeable yet. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, yet only minor results were noticeable. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented effectively. Very satisfactory results were very evident. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __ PD __CH __PFP __PM __ARD __RD -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for LGCDD Division @ Region Criteria Point Score Rating 111
#2 Innovations Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member Criteria Point Score Rating -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for LGCDD Division @ Region 112
#3 Awards Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for office to achieve Recognition from Central Office and other agencies informed concerned office about the awards or requirements but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed concerned office about the details of the awards or requirements informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Proposed action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. More than 2 of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 10 but short of Top 5 informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. Almost all of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 5 50% Facilitation for LGUs to achieve other agencies Local Governance Audit, i.e., CFLGA, Gawad Kalasag, etc. informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 1 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. 50% Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member -0- Criteria Point Score Rating BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for LGCDD Division @ Region 113
#1 Work Performance Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Absence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and Non-Compliance to Program Deliverables >2 Incidences of Late Submission, >2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, >1 Incidence of No Submission OR >1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1-2 Incidences of Late Submission, 1-2 Incidences of Incomplete Submission, 1 Incidence of No Submission OR 1 Incidence of NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, 1 Incidence of Incomplete Submission, Zero Incidence of No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables 1 Incidence of Late Submission, Zero Incidence of Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Zero Incidence of Late, Incomplete, No Submission and NonCompliance to Program Deliverables Provision of Administrative Support or Technical Support No Administrative or Technical Support Provided to internal or external clients Administrative or Technical Support provided but with minor contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided still needs major improvement. Administrative or Technical Support provided with minor to moderate contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but still can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role or contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is acceptable but can be improve. Administrative or Technical Support provided with major role / contribution to the whole program, project or activity. Support provided is very satisfactory and may be showcase as a good example to others. Strategic and Critical Response Absence of initiative on this area Gathers and analyzes data/information and plans to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns. Not yet implemented. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, results were not noticeable yet. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented, yet only minor results were noticeable. Gathers and analyzes data/information and able to develop interventions or strategies that could prevent or mitigate future concerns and have it implemented effectively. Very satisfactory results were very evident. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ Primary Rater : __ PD __CH __PFP __PM __ARD __RD -0- ANNEX T.4 BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for ORD Criteria Point Score Rating 114
#2 Innovations Name of Division : _____________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member Point Score Rating -0- Criteria BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for ORD 115
#3 Awards Name of Division : _______________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for office to achieve Recognition from Central Office and other agencies informed concerned office about the awards or requirements but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed concerned office about the details of the awards or requirements informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Proposed action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. More than 2 of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 10 but short of Top 5 informed concerned office about the awards or requirements Initiated action points to help the office prepare for the award/program. Almost all of the action items were completed. The Office is recognized for best performance - within Top 5 Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for ORD Criteria Point Score Rating 116
ANNEX U #1 Innovations Name of Provincial Team : ___________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Identified and implemented out of the box strategies to improve office overall performance no innovations introduced innovation but such is not very responsive to the needs of the clients or the call of the times simple innovations identified and practiced which led to simple or minor improvements on work operations/performan ce able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing less than 6 months; able to identify and implement out of the box strategies or approaches which lead to significant improvement in office operations and/or client performance in local governance innovations existing more than 6 months; Minimal DILG funds/resources utilized OR innovation is implemented with more than 1 partner organizations or instituitions. Showcased innovation resulted to significant impacts and improvement no innovations to measure for results innovation has potential to improve program implementation and /or office operations innovation lead to minor improvements; needs more room for improvement innovation lead to considerably noticeable improvements; yet can still be improved. the innovation(s) introduced led to a significant improvement in the office operations and or client performance in local governance Established partnership in the implementation of the innovation (s) no partnership established in the implementation/r ealization of the innovations plan to establish partnership in the implementation/re alization of the innovations established partnership with 1 partner in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 2 partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations established partnership with 3 or more partners in the implementation/realiz ation of the innovations No DILG Funds Utilized No DILG funds utilized in the implementation of the innovation Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Provincial Office Criteria Point Score Rating -0- 117
#2 Awards Name of Provincial Team : ________________________ 5 10 15 20 25 Facilitation for LGUs to achieve LG Audits Ideal or High Functionality and/ or Compliance ie. FDP/SGFH, ADAC Audit, POC Audit, etc informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. FOR GROUP : <5% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. FOR GROUP : at least 10% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. FOR GROUP : >20%- 49% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. LGU gained moderate functionality or compliance level. FOR GROUP : at least 50% of Component LGUs have high functionality or compliance informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. Almost all of the action items were completed. LGU gained high functionality or compliance level. FOR GROUP: >50% of component LGUs have high functionality or compliance level Facilitation for LGUs to achieve the SGLG informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. FOR GROUP : <5% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. FOR GROUP : at least 10% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. At least 2 of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan. LGU is recognized as POTENTIAL SGLG Passer - National Level or National Finalist. FOR GROUP : >20%- 49% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. More than 2 of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan. LGU is recognized as FINALIST SGLG Passer - National Level. FOR GROUP : at least 50% of Component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the SGLG, its objectives, indicators and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the SGLG. Almost all of the action items were completed, e.g. creation of the SGLG Team or its counterpart, completion of action plan to address the SGLG gaps, conduct of regular monitoring of the action plan LGU is recognized as SGLG Passer - National Level. FOR GROUP: at least >50% of component LGUs are SGLG Passers - National Level Facilitation for LGUs to achieve other agencies Local Governance Audit, i.e., CFLGA, Gawad Kalasag, etc. informed the LCE or some functionaries about the audit but some details were not clear to all concerned. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 1 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. At least 2 of the action items were completed. informed the LCE and concerned functionary(ies) about the audit, its objectives and expected deliverables as well as timelines. Proposed to the LCE action points to help LGUs prepare for the audit. More than 2 of the action items were completed. Rated by : __________________________ Signature over Printed Name Office Name : __________________________ PRAISE Committee Member -0- BICOL - BIDA Rating Sheet for Provincial Office Criteria Point Score Rating 118