BUISINESS INTERNATIONAL

Pulhan, A., Yorucu, V., & Sinan Evcan, N. (2020). Global energy market dynamics and natural gas development in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Utilities Policy, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101040 Rabii, W. (2023). Global Appeal: Colorblindness, Neoliberalism, and Neighborhood Branding. Critical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221146268 Radenović, I., Lečić-Cvetković, D., Rajković, T., & Aničić, N. (2023). Textile industry and coronavirus - the impact of the pandemic on sales performance: a case study of Inditex. Industria Textila, 74(3). https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.074.03.202237 Risdarwanto, Nasution, H., & Pujangkoro, S. (2023). Business Strategy Formulation : A Literature Review. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 25(1). Sin, C., Tavares, O., & Aguiar, J. (2023). COVID-19: Threat or Opportunity for the Portuguese Higher Education’s Attractiveness for International Students? Journal of Studies in International Education, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221121396 Solberg, C. A., & Durrieu, F. (2023). Patterns of international marketing strategy. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 38(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2022- 0091 Soyer, B., Nicholas, A., & Leloudas, G. (2023). Cyber Risk Insurance – An Effective Risk Management Tool for SMES in the UK? Edinburgh Law Review, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2023.0826 Stathoulopoulos, N., Koval, A., & Nikolakopoulos, G. (2024). 3DEG: Data-Driven Descriptor Extraction for Global re-localization in subterranean environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121508 Stock, I. (2023). Migrants’ transnational social positioning strategies in the middle classes. Global Networks. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12444 Su, J., Zhang, Y., & Wu, X. (2023). How market pressures and organizational readiness drive digital marketing adoption strategies’ evolution in small and medium enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122655 Su, Q., McAvoy, A., & Plotkin, J. B. (2023). Strategy evolution on dynamic networks. Nature Computational Science. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00509-z

Su, S. (2023). International Business Strategies of Firms with Political Changes: A Case of Xiaomi’s Entry into the Indian Market. BCP Business & Management, 40. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v40i.4383 Suhairi Suhairi, Dian Irmawani, Mira Nur Aisah, Sonia Purba, & Amalia Munajah Nasution. (2023). PERAN MANAJEMEN PEMASARAN GLOBAL DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEPUASAN KONSUMEN. Jurnal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59031/jmsc.v1i1.72 Sun, M., & Kim, J. (2023). Sustainability and Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Brand Color and Brand Gender. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118908 Suprapto, Y., Winnerko, F., & Studi Manajemen, P. (2023). Jurnal Mirai Management Pengaruh Lingkungan Budaya Terhadap Implementasi Bisnis Skala Internasional. Jurnal Mirai Management, 8(1). Švedas, A. (2023). How to Reflect on 20th Century Man Facing Dramatic Situations and Hard Choices? Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos, 51. https://doi.org/10.15388/LIS.2023.51.4 Swaithes, L., Paskins, Z., Quicke, J. G., Stevenson, K., Fell, K., & Dziedzic, K. (2023). Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study. Implementation Science Communications, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1 Tao, M., Sheng, M. S., & Wen, L. (2023). How does financial development influence carbon emission intensity in the OECD countries: Some insights from the information and communication technology perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117553 Tavoian, D., & Craighead, D. H. (2023). Deep breathing exercise at work: Potential applications and impact. Frontiers in Physiology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1040091 Thompson-Bell, J. (2023). Student-centred strategies for higher music education: Using peer-To-peer critique and practice as research methodologies to train conservatoire musicians. British Journal of Music Education, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051722000080 Tippmann, E., Ambos, T. C., Del Giudice, M., Monaghan, S., & Ringov, D. (2023). Scaleups and scaling in an international business context. Journal of World Business, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101397

Torres, E., García-Fernández, A., Iñigo, D., Lara-Romero, C., Morente-López, J., PrietoBenítez, S., Rubio Teso, M. L., & Iriondo, J. M. (2023). Facilitated Adaptation as A Conservation Tool in the Present Climate Change Context: A Methodological Guide. In Plants (Vol. 12, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061258 Tuominen, S., Reijonen, H., Nagy, G., Buratti, A., & Laukkanen, T. (2023). Customercentric strategy driving innovativeness and business growth in international markets. International Marketing Review, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2020-0215 Ustolin, F., Campari, A., Giannini, L., Baboi, E., & Paltrinieri, N. (2023). Identification of Consequences of Failure for Hydrogen Equipment. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 98. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2398032 Vajjhala, N. R., & Strang, K. D. (2022). Impact of Information Communication Technology Strategies on Learning Effectiveness. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.292026 van der Wouden, F., & Youn, H. (2023). The impact of geographical distance on learning through collaboration. Research Policy, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104698 Wang, K., Zhu, M., Yang, Z., Bai, L., Huan, S., & Wang, C. (2023). Sustainable Production of Stable Lignin Nanoparticle-Stabilized Pickering Emulsions via Cellulose Nanofibril-Induced Depletion Effect. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c01972 Wang, X., & Li, H. (2022). Innovation or Imitation: Empirical Test Based on EPS Global Statistics. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9705404 Williams, S., & Murphy, D. F. (2023). Learning from Each Other: UK Global Businesses, SMEs, CSR and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054151 Yang, M., Gabrielsson, P., & Andersson, S. (2023). Entrepreneurs’ Social Ties and International Digital Entrepreneurial Marketing in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Internationalization. Journal of International Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X231178220 Yefremova, N., Marchenko, M., & Lomovskykh, L. (2023). The role and significance of foresight in the strategic management of regional development in the era of

globalization and digital transformation of the economy. Galic’kij Ekonomičnij Visnik, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2023.03.145 Yin, H., Chen, Z., Xiao, Y., Mohsin, M., & Liu, Z. (2023). A study on the assessment of risk management performance in maritime start-ups: evidence from China. Maritime Policy and Management, 50(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2028028 Yue, D. (2023). Analysis on McDonald’s Localization Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.54254/2754- 1169/10/20230426 Zakir, F., Wang, D., Rehman, A., & Waheed, A. (2023). Supply Chain Process Improvement for International Airline Industry. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.32738/JEPPM-2023-0002 Zan, K., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Yu, J. D., Jin, H. Y., & Ma, S. C. (2023). Distribution, determination method, risk assessment, and strategy of exogenous pyrrolizidine alkaloids in tea. Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prmcm.2023.100277 Zhang, W., Li, Y., Xiong, X., & Wang, P. (2021). Downside risk and the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106246 Zhang, Y., & Cheng, L. (2023). The role of transport infrastructure in economic growth: Empirical evidence in the UK. Transport Policy, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.017 Zheng, Q., Liu, J., & Hongbin sun. (2023). Economic and carbon emission performance of green farming by marketing cooperatives. Heliyon, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15913 Zhu, M., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Li, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, T., Song, S. Y., Zhang, B., Hezam, K., & Zhang, J. (2023). Breast tumor-targeted drug delivery via polymer nanocarriers: Endogenous and exogenous strategies. In Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Vol. 140, Issue 31). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.54227 Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., & Świca, I. (2023). Microalgal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture and Utilization from the European Union Perspective. Energies, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031446

BOOK CHAPTER OPTIMAL ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE TO IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PERFORMANCE Lecturer : Dr. Eko Handayanto, Drs. M.M. Created by : Argya Rakha Saskara (202110160311219) Nadya Putri Arini (202110160311230) Venny Wulansari (202110160311259) MANAGEMENT STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG 2023-2024

INTRODUCTION According to Silva, (2022)In today's dynamic world of international business, organizations are constantly striving to improve their performance on a global scale. Amidst the challenges of evolving market conditions, shifting consumer preferences, and fierce global competition, one critical element that can significantly influence an organization's success is its organizational structure(Hu & Zhu, 2022). The way a company is structured and organized plays a fundamental role in its ability to navigate the complexities of the international market, respond effectively to diverse market demands, and ultimately achieve superior performance(Salamova et al., 2023). This introduction explores the concept of optimizing organizational structure to enhance international business performance, emphasizing the intricate relationship between the two(Hamid Saremi & Pedram Saremi, 2022). Globalization has made international business increasingly interconnected and worldwide in scope(Nthenya, 2023). Organizations are expanding their reach beyond their domestic borders to tap into new markets, leverage global resources, and gain a competitive edge. Yet, this expansion presents a unique set of challenges, including managing diverse cultures, navigating varying regulatory environments, and understanding different consumer behaviors(Borgi et al., 2023). These complexities underscore the importance of organizations carefully evaluating their organizational architecture to ensure it aligns with their global strategies(Kusi-Sarpong et al., 2023; Mäenpää, 2022). The organizational structure acts as the foundation of an international business's operations, determining how authority, power, responsibilities, information flow, and decision-making processes are structured(Valecha, 2022). By optimizing the organizational structure, companies can streamline their operations, improve communication, and cultivate a more adaptable and responsive organizational culture(Magd & Jonathan, 2022). In the context of international business, where the ability to adapt to local market conditions while maintaining a consistent global strategy is paramount, these factors become essential(Zheng, 2022). In the following sections, we will delve deeper into the concept of an optimal organizational structure, explore a variety of strategies and approaches that organizations can employ to elevate their international

business performance, and provide real-world examples of companies that have successfully aligned their organizational architecture with their global strategies to achieve remarkable outcomes(Nemtsova et al., 2023). This discussion aims to offer valuable insights and practical strategies for organizations seeking to thrive in the everevolving landscape of international business(García-Rivas et al., 2023). LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION According to Belitski et al., (2023)The literature extensively explores the critical role of selecting the most suitable organizational structure in enhancing the performance of international businesses. Researchers have delved into the intricate relationship between organizational structure and a company's ability to navigate the complexities of the global market. The effectiveness of an organizational structure profoundly impacts a company's capacity to adapt to diverse international markets, respond to global challenges, and ultimately achieve superior performance(Castro, 2022). One recurring theme in the academic literature emphasizes the need to find the right balance between centralization and decentralization. The literature suggests that multinational corporations tend to excel when they manage to strike this equilibrium(Tabares et al., 2023). The transnational organizational structure, which amalgamates elements of both the global and multinational approaches, has gained recognition for its potential to foster success in international business(Kobrossy et al., 2022). This approach enables the standardization of certain processes and products on a global scale while granting subsidiaries the autonomy to cater to the demands of local markets(Gull & Idrees, 2022). This equilibrium can significantly enhance responsiveness to local markets while maintaining global consistency(Kiss & Ruël, 2022). Furthermore, the literature underscores the critical importance of establishing clear channels for communication and facilitating the sharing of knowledge within international organizations(Chen & Xu, 2022). Effective communication is pivotal in coordinating activities across different regions and ensuring the seamless flow of knowledge(Sangeetha et al., 2022). Many research studies underscore the role of information technology in supporting efficient communication and knowledge exchange within a global organization(Chavan et al., 2022). By optimizing these communication mechanisms, companies can enhance their organizational structure to elevate their international business performance(Majeed et al., 2022). In summary, the academic

literature highlights the dynamic nature of international business and the necessity for adaptable organizational structures capable of responding to the ever-evolving global landscape(Shivam & Gupta, 2023). Explain what is meant by organizational architecture Organizational architecture refers to the overarching framework and structure of an organization, including its various components like hierarchy, systems, procedures, and culture(Tchakoute Tchuigoua et al., 2022). It serves as a detailed plan that outlines how an organization's different elements collaborate to accomplish its objectives and goals(Demyanchuk, 2022). Organizational architecture is a comprehensive structure that provides guidance for decision-making, resource allocation, and the management of both internal and external factors to ensure an organization's success(Björnsdóttir et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). Crucial components within the context of organizational architecture include the organizational structure, which delineates the arrangement of roles and responsibilities within the organization. This structure defines how various departments and teams are structured, how authority is delegated, and how information flows through the organization(Houlihan, 2022). The choice of structure can have a substantial impact on operational efficiency, communication, and adaptability to changing circumstances(Roecker & Floriani, 2022). Another significant element of organizational architecture is the organizational culture, representing the shared values, beliefs, and norms that steer the behavior of individuals within the organization(Bhatt et al., 2022). A well-defined and positive culture can greatly influence employee motivation, job satisfaction, and the overall performance of the organization. It also plays a key role in attracting and retaining talent, as employees are more likely to identify with an organization that shares their values and cultivates a supportive culture(Barton et al., 2023). Additionally, processes and systems are essential components of organizational architecture, encompassing the methods and technologies used for various tasks and functions within the organization(Szeiner et al., 2023). Efficient processes and systems can enhance productivity, reduce errors, and facilitate an organization's ability to adapt to evolving market conditions. Organizational architecture offers the framework for designing and optimizing these processes and systems to support the attainment of strategic objectives(Ajgaonkar, 2022; Gonçalves et al., 2022; Rodrigues

& Child, 2023). In summary, organizational architecture is the encompassing plan and structure of an organization, including aspects like its structure, culture, and operational procedures(da Fonseca & Kogut, 2023). It serves as a fundamental framework that shapes the operation of an organization and its ability to achieve objectives, offering direction for decision-making and resource allocation(Kaplan, 2023). A well-designed organizational architecture is essential for an organization's capability to adjust, innovate, and thrive in a competitive business environment(Holbeche, 2022). Describe the various organizational architecture choices that can be made in international business In international business, companies must make complex decisions regarding organizational architecture to operate effectively in the global marketplace(Olugbodi, 2022). There are several organizational architecture choices available, each with its own strengths and challenges(Vuong et al., 2022). One common approach is the global organizational architecture, where a company operates as a single entity with global coverage(Kelton & Murthy, 2023). This often involves a centralized decision-making structure, standardized products or services, and a consistent global brand image. This approach can help achieve economies of scale and enhance global consistency but may face difficulties in adapting to local market nuances and changing customer preferences(Putri et al., 2022; Tsianaka, 2023). As an alternative, the multinational organizational architecture acknowledges the significance of local variations in international markets(Khamaksorn et al., 2022). In this structure, subsidiaries or regional divisions have more autonomy to adapt to local conditions and meet specific customer needs(An et al., 2022). This approach can enhance responsiveness to local markets but may lead to inefficiencies and challenges in maintaining a consistent global brand image(Queiroz et al., 2023). Another option is the transnational organizational architecture, which combines elements of both the global and multinational approaches. This approach aims to strike a delicate balance between global coordination and local responsiveness, with intricate coordination and communication mechanisms to facilitate knowledge sharing and collaboration across the organization(Werder et al., 2023). This approach is favored by companies seeking a global presence while remaining attuned to local market requirements. In the dynamic field of international business, companies must carefully consider their goals, available resources,

and market conditions to select the most suitable organizational architecture for their specific circumstances. The choice of organizational architecture significantly influences how a company operates, competes, and achieves success on the global stage(GómezCaicedo et al., 2022; Gracey & Yearwood, 2022; Martusewicz et al., 2022). Explain how the organizational architecture can be matched to global strategy to improve Performance Harmonizing organizational architecture with a global strategy is pivotal for enhancing overall performance in the international business landscape(Kassberg & Dornberger, 2022). Initially, it's imperative to establish a well-defined global strategy, encompassing decisions about market entry, product adaptation, and competitive positioning across diverse regions. Subsequently, the organization's structure, systems, and culture should be customized to facilitate the execution of this strategy (Kalogiannidis, Chatzitheodoridis, et al., 2022). For example, if the global strategy prioritizes tailoring products to local preferences, the organizational structure may involve decentralized decision-making, empowering regional teams to make localized product adjustments(Pérez & Gómez, 2022). Moreover, efficient communication and knowledge-sharing systems and processes should be designed to respond promptly to market changes. Ensuring cultural alignment is also essential, as cultivating a global mindset that values diverse perspectives is critical for the success of a global strategy(Su et al., 2023). The subsequent phase involves the ongoing surveillance and adjustment of the organizational architecture(Estevão et al., 2022). International markets are dynamic, necessitating adaptable global strategies to stay relevant. As market conditions evolve, the organizational architecture should possess the flexibility to adapt promptly. This might involve reconfiguring the organizational structure, reevaluating communication processes, or adapting the corporate culture to accommodate new realities(Santos et al., 2022). By maintaining continuous alignment between the organizational architecture and the global strategy, the organization is better equipped to address emerging opportunities and challenges while elevating overall performance on a global scale(Мяо, 2022). This

synchronicity between strategy and architecture not only ensures the attainment of strategic objectives but also nurtures organizational agility and a competitive edge in the global marketplace(Hordiienko & Prykhodko, 2022). Discuss what is required for an international business to change its organizational architecture so it better matches its global strategy. Transforming the organizational architecture of an international business to harmonize with its global strategy is a multifaceted process that necessitates thorough planning and execution(Arikan et al., 2022). Several essential elements and steps are imperative for the effective implementation of this transition. First and foremost, it is crucial to have a precise comprehension of the global strategy(Ahmed et al., 2023). The organization must define its strategic objectives meticulously, encompassing market entry tactics, product positioning, and regional emphasis(Schillig, 2023). This strategic clarity acts as the cornerstone for aligning the organizational architecture. Subsequently, a comprehensive evaluation of the current organizational architecture is essential(Kalogiannidis, Kontsas, et al., 2022). This assessment entails scrutinizing the existing structure, systems, and culture to identify discrepancies with the strategy. It is essential to identify gaps and weaknesses and pinpoint specific areas requiring modification(Liesa, 2022; Roshid et al., 2022). Following the assessment, it is imperative to formulate a well-structured change plan. This plan should delineate the necessary structural adjustments, enhancements to systems, and adaptations to the culture to provide better support for the global strategy(Armoni et al., 2022; Pizzolitto, 2023). Depending on the strategy, the organizational structure may necessitate transitioning from centralized to decentralized or vice versa. Systems for communication, information exchange, and decision-making should undergo improvements to enhance coordination across international operations(Mgbemena et al., 2022). Cultivating the appropriate organizational culture that promotes a global perspective and embraces diversity is of paramount importance(Mamedova et al., 2022). Subsequently, it is essential to transparently communicate the changes and engage employees to secure their support and buy-in for the new organizational architecture(Wurm et al., 2023).

Throughout this process, continual monitoring and adaptability are indispensable. The international business should consistently evaluate the efficacy of the alterations and make the requisite adjustments as market conditions evolve, and the global strategy matures(Li, 2022). Flexibility and adaptability within the organizational architecture are imperative to accommodate the dynamic nature of international markets(Jakobsen et al., 2023). In conclusion, aligning the organizational architecture of an international business with its global strategy involves gaining a strategic understanding of goals, conducting a thorough assessment of existing structures, creating a well-structured plan for change, transparent communication, and continuous evaluation(Fernández Cueria et al., 2022). By systematically addressing these components, an organization can better position itself to attain its global objectives and elevate overall performance in the global marketplace(Crane et al., 2023; Kuzior et al., 2022). CONCLUSION In the complex and ever-evolving realm of international business, the pursuit of an optimal organizational structure to enhance global performance remains a crucial strategic imperative. As organizations expand into diverse international markets, they must navigate a landscape marked by cultural nuances, regulatory intricacies, and fluctuating consumer demands. The effectiveness of an organization's structure in accommodating these complexities and aligning with its global strategy can be the differentiator between success and stagnation. The concept of an optimal organizational structure is not a one-size-fits-all solution; instead, it's a dynamic and tailored approach that responds to the unique demands of an organization's global strategy. The interplay between centralization and decentralization, the alignment of systems and processes with international objectives, and the cultivation of a culture that values diversity and global perspective are all integral facets of this optimization. Companies that succeed in optimizing their organizational structure create a nimble, responsive, and coordinated global operation that thrives on local market adaptability while maintaining global coherence.

In conclusion, the pursuit of an optimal organizational structure is a journey, not a destination, and it is an ongoing process. As international markets continue to evolve, organizations must remain agile and willing to adapt their organizational architecture to better match their global strategy. By fostering this alignment, organizations can enhance their ability to navigate the challenges and seize the opportunities of international business, ultimately achieving improved global performance and a competitive edge in the international marketplace. REFERENCE Ahmed, J. U., Islam, Q. T., Ahmed, A., & Amin, S. Bin. (2023). Extending Resource Value-Based Circular Economy Business Model in Emerging Economies: Lessons from India. Business Perspectives and Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337211070363 Ajgaonkar, M. (2022). The “d’you” story: gearing the startup during the pandemic. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS06-2021-0198 An, Y. H., Zagelmeyer, S., & Rygh, A. (2022). Between liability and asset: a critical review of 25 years of foreignness research in international business. In Critical Perspectives on International Business (Vol. 18, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-07-2020-0102 Arikan, I., Arikan, A. M., & Shenkar, O. (2022). Revisiting emerging market multinational enterprise views: The Goldilocks story restated. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00459-6 Armoni, A., Ryngelblum, A., & Bazanini, R. (2022). The possibility of coexistence of different MBA logics in Brazil. International Journal of Management Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100571 Barton, J. R., Baeza-González, S., & Román, Á. (2023). Unravelling sustainable salmon aquaculture: an historical political ecology of a business responsibility discourse, 1970–2020. Maritime Studies, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00297-2 Belitski, M., Martin, J., Stettler, T., & Wales, W. (2023). Organizational scaling: The role of knowledge spillovers in driving multinational enterprise persistent rapid

growth. Journal of World Business, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101461 Bhatt, N., Saurabh, P., & Verma, R. K. (2022). Technology startup ecosystem in India. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2022.122491 Björnsdóttir, S. H., Jensson, P., de Boer, R. J., & Thorsteinsson, S. E. (2022). The Importance of Risk Management: What is Missing in ISO Standards? Risk Analysis, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13803 Borgi, H., Mabrouk, F., Bousrih, J., & Mekni, M. M. (2023). Environmental Change and Inclusive Finance: Does Governance Quality Matter for African Countries? Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043533 Castro, F. A. O. (2022). The Asian entrepreneurship core in COVID-19 period: value chains, specialized education, massive participation of women and strategic accompaniment. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(3).132-147.2022 Chavan, M., Galperin, B. L., Ostle, A., & Behl, A. (2022). Millennial’s perception on cyberloafing: workplace deviance or cultural norm? Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(13). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1956588 Chen, S., & Xu, J. (2022). COVID-19, business continuity management and standardization: case study of Huawei. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-10-2021-0445 Crane, M. E., Kendall, P. C., Chorpita, B. F., Sanders, M. R., Miller, A. R., WebsterStratton, C., McWilliam, J., Beck, J. S., Ashen, C., Embry, D. D., Pickering, J. A., & Daleiden, E. L. (2023). The role of implementation organizations in scaling evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Implementation Science, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01280-5 da Fonseca, L., & Kogut, C. S. (2023). DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION PROGRAMS IN MULTINATIONALS: OPPORTUNITY FOR REVERSE KNOWLEDGE

TRANSFER. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 63(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020230503 Demyanchuk, Y. I. (2022). TRANSLATION OF THE OFFICIAL BUSINESS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE TERMINOLOGY OF THE UN. Naukovì Zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo Unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka Akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ», 1(14(82)). https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2022-14(82)-54-61 Estevão, J., Lopes, J. D., & Penela, D. (2022). The importance of the business environment for the informal economy: Evidence from the Doing Business ranking. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121288 Fernández Cueria, N., Pérez Ricardo, E. del C., Medina Labrada, J. R., Coronado Provance, K. Z., & Feria Velázquez, F. F. (2022). Digital marketing management in tourist organizations. Visión de Futuro, 26, No 2-2022. https://doi.org/10.36995/j.visiondefuturo.2022.26.02.006.en García-Rivas, M. I., Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J., Noguera-Vivo, J. M., & Meseguer-Sánchez, V. (2023). Corporate social responsibility reports: A review of the evolution, approaches and prospects. In Heliyon (Vol. 9, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18348 Gómez-Caicedo, M. I., Gaitán-Angulo, M., Quintero, A., & Danna-Buitrago, J. P. (2022). Endogenous growth factors and their empirical verification in the Colombian business context by applying fuzzy measurement techniques. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06492-8 Gonçalves, M. S., d’Angelo, M. J., & Rocha, R. G. (2022). Generating shared value: intersection between organisations that invest in social innovation. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2020-0201 Gracey, A., & Yearwood, K. (2022). Building an effective business continuity framework: Case study of a critical national infrastructure organisation’s approach. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning, 15(4).

Gull, S., & Idrees, H. (2022). Green training and organizational efficiency: mediating role of green competencies. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1– 2). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2020-0147 Hamid Saremi, & Pedram Saremi. (2022). Role of ethics in global business. Journal of Management and Science, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.12.49 Holbeche, L. (2022). Aligning Human Resources and Business Strategy, Third Edition. In Aligning Human Resources and Business Strategy, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219996 Hordiienko, Y., & Prykhodko, O. (2022). State Support of Entrepreneurial Activity During the War in Ukraine. SSP Modern Economics, State and Public Administration, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53933/mespa.v1i1.75 Houlihan, B. (2022). Challenges to globalisation and the impact on the values underpinning international sport agreements. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2022.2100807 Hu, S., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Effects of Social Media Usage on Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: A Cross-Cultural Empirical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837752 Jakobsen, M., Worm, V., & Horak, S. (2023). Compassion in the international business studies – prospects for future research. Critical Perspectives on International Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-01-2021-0012 Kalogiannidis, S., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Giannarakis, G., & Mavrommati, A. (2022). Business Organizations’ Flexibility as an Innovation Tool: Factors Affecting Flexibility in Organizations. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.33168/LISS.2022.0417 Kalogiannidis, S., Kontsas, S., & Papaevangelou, O. (2022). Influence of Strategic Marketing Approaches in Business Communication. Business Management and Strategy, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v13i1.19430 Kaplan, R. (2023). “Rather Than Follow Change, Business Must Lead this Transformation”: Global business’s institutional project to privatize global

environmental governance, 1990–2010. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231151498 Kassberg, G., & Dornberger, U. (2022). Perception of export intenders on relevant resources and competences for the internationalization of vocational education and training (VET) providers. International Journal of Training and Development, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12278 Kelton, A. S., & Murthy, U. S. (2023). Reimagining design science and behavioral science AIS research through a business activity lens. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100623 Khamaksorn, A., Tah, J. H. M., & Kurul, E. (2022). Social Networks and Knowledge Transfer in International Construction Joint Venture Projects: A Case Study in Thailand. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2022.27.1.7 Kiss, R., & Ruël, H. J. M. (2022). International negotiations in a hybrid diplomatic arena: new actors, new tools - a practitioners’ contribution. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijdipe.2022.125230 Kobrossy, S., Karaszewski, R., & AlChami, R. (2022). The Institutionalization of Implicit and Explicit CSR in a Developing Country Context: The Case of Lebanon. Administrative Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040142 Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gong, Y., Brown, S., Gupta, H., Bai, C., & Orji, I. J. (2023). Multitier sustainable supply chains management for global sustainability. In International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 61, Issue 14). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2216831 Kuzior, A., Kettler, K., & Rąb, Ł. (2022). Digitalization of Work and Human Resources Processes as a Way to Create a Sustainable and Ethical Organization. Energies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010172 Li, X. (2022). Solving Paradox by Increasing Technological Capacity: A Critique of the Concept of Business Model Innovation at TikTok. In Management and Organization Review (Vol. 18, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.78

Liesa, C. R. F. (2022). Business due diligence and Human Rights: Towards a Spanish Law. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7190 Mäenpää, J. (2022). Distributing ethics: Filtering images of death at three news photo desks. Journalism, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921996308 Magd, H., & Jonathan, H. (2022). Digitalization - An Emerging Business Trend for Sustainable Transformation of SMEs Sectors: A Proposed Model for Survival and Sustainability in Uncertainties. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 14(2). Majeed, M. U., Aslam, S., Murtaza, S. A., Attila, S., & Molnár, E. (2022). Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Green Purchase Intentions: Mediating Role of Green Brand Image and Consumer Beliefs towards the Environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811703 Mamedova, N. M., Bezveselnaya, Z. V., Ivleva, M. I., & Komarova, V. (2022). Environmental management for sustainable business development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(9) Martusewicz, J., Szewczyk, K., & Wierzbic, A. (2022). The Environmental Protection and Effective Energy Consumption in the Light of the EFQM Model 2020—Case Study. Energies, 15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197260 Mgbemena, G. C., Enetanya, I. D., Nsofor, M. N., & Ogbogu, F. O. (2022). Talent Management And Organization Performance In Pharmaceutical Companies In Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development, 2(11). Nemtsova, E., Bekmurzaeva, R., & Rykalina, O. (2023). The Low Carbon Trend from a Sustainability Perspective: Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions. BIO Web of Conferences, 63. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20236306012

Nthenya, N. N. (2023). Knowledge Transfer and the Development of Airline business in Africa: Kenya Airways, 1977-2017. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2023.8.2.33989 Olugbodi, A. K. (2022). The Impact of Social Media on 21st Century Businesses Growth: A Case Study - Background Check International Limited, Nigeria. TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21522/tijmg.2015.08.01.art002 Pérez, L. F., & Gómez, M. I. (2022). Public-private strategies to establish a successful avocado export cycle: cases from Colombia. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-11- 2021-0275 Pizzolitto, E. (2023). Music in business and management studies: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00339-3 Putri, E. I. K., Dharmawan, A. H., Hospes, O., Yulian, B. E., Amalia, R., Mardiyaningsih, D. I., Kinseng, R. A., Tonny, F., Pramudya, E. P., Rahmadian, F., & Suradiredja, D. Y. (2022). The Oil Palm Governance: Challenges of Sustainability Policy in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031820 Queiroz, M., Tallon, P. P., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2023). Conditional paths to business unit agility: corporate IT platforms and the moderating role of business unit IT autonomy. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2039564 Rodrigues, S. B., & Child, J. (2023). The role of corporations in addressing non-market institutional voids during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of an emerging economy. In Journal of International Business Policy (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-022-00141-0 Roecker, R., & Floriani, D. E. (2022). Cultural intelligence, international experience and early internationalization: An essay on connecting constructs. Contextus – Revista

Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 20. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2022.72806 Roshid, M. M., Webb, S., & Chowdhury, R. (2022). English as a Business Lingua Franca: A Discursive Analysis of Business E-Mails. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418808040 Salamova, A. S., Kantemirova, M., & Gishlakaev, S. (2023). The Future of the Climate Agenda in Banks. SHS Web of Conferences, 172. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317202023 Sangeetha, M., Hoti, A., Bansal, R., Faez Hasan, M., Gajjar, K., & Srivastava, K. (2022). Facilitating artificial intelligence supply chain analytics through finance management during the pandemic crises. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.418 Santos, R. P. dos, Salgado, T. M., & Pereira, V. R. (2022). Business process prioritization criteria: a case study in the financial market. RAUSP Management Journal, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2020-0155 Schillig, M. A. (2023). Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) under English law. Law and Financial Markets Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2023.2174814 Shivam, & Gupta, M. (2023). Quality process reengineering in industry 4.0: A BPR perspective. Quality Engineering, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2022.2098044 Silva, V. (2022). The ILO and the future of work: The politics of global labour policy. Global Social Policy, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211004853 Su, S., Baird, K., & Munir, R. (2023). Organisational resilience: the role of organisational culture from an organisational life cycle perspective. International Journal of Manpower, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-11-2021-0631 Szeiner, Z., Juhász, T., Hevesi, E., & Poór, J. (2023). HRM challenges in Slovakia generated by the Covid-19 pandemic. Central European Management Journal, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-02-2022-0024

Tabares, A., Tavera, J. F., Álvarez Barrera, C. P., & Escobar-Sierra, M. (2023). Impacts of managerial capabilities on perceived international performance: mediating role of international opportunity-driven behavior. European Business Review, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-03-2021-0077 Tchakoute Tchuigoua, H., Simo, C., & Durrieu, F. (2022). Business cycle and cash holdings: Empirical evidence from microfinance institutions. Finance Research Letters, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103228 Tsianaka, E. (2023). The Pandemic: Shuffling the Deck of the Global Business Environment. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.54648/GTCJ2023024 Valecha, N. (2022). A Study on Importance of Ethical Responsibilities in HR Management. International Journal for Global Academic & Scientific Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v1i1.7 Vuong, Q. H., Le, T. T., La, V. P., Nguyen, H. T. T., Ho, M. T., Van Khuc, Q., & Nguyen, M. H. (2022). Covid-19 vaccines production and societal immunization under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management theory and conceptual framework. In Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01034-6 Werder, K., Hyrynsalmi, S., & Wang, X. (2023). ACM SIGSOFT Towards Sustainable Software Business: 5th International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 48(1). Wurm, B., Becker, M., Pentland, B. T., Lyytinen, K., Weber, B., Grisold, T., Mendling, J., & Kremser, W. (2023). Digital Twins of Organizations: A Socio-Technical View on Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 52. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05223 Zhang, Y. T., Abula, B., & Wang, B. (2022). Research on Influencing Factors of HighQuality Development of Agricultural Trade between China and SCO Member States in the Context of Industrial Internet of Things. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9410605

Zheng, W. (2022). A Study on the Impact of International Translation Levels Based on Multiple Correlation Analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9120772 Мяо, Ц. (2022). FEATURES OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE OF MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Економіка Та Суспільство, 39. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-39-30

BOOK CHAPTER MARKET PENETRATION in DEVELOPED and EMERGING ECONOMIES : STRATEGIES & INSIGHTS Lecture : Dr. Eko Handayanto, Drs.,M.M. Team Group : Ananda Permana Putra (202110160311226) Kinlung (202110160311296) Muhammad Iffat Taqiuddin (202110160311604) MANAGEMENT STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESSUNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG 2023

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Recent research has focused on investigating the transmission of economic shocks in an increasingly interconnected global economy, with a growing emphasis on synchronizing economic cycles across various sectors and understanding the connection between trade relationships and the dissemination of these shocks (Sebestyén & Iloskics, 2020). Additionally, there has been a surge in studies concerning sustainable development, primarily centered on advanced economies, often overlooking issues pertinent to developing nations (R. Said et al., 2022).For enterprises contemplating international expansion, the choice of an entry mode is a strategic decision (Guru et al., 2023). Various entry methods come with their own unique advantages and disadvantages, and companies base their selection on factors like market conditions, industry characteristics, and resource availability (Chang, 2022). Emerging economies exhibit considerable diversity in terms of geography and developmental stage, undergoing significant changes in their historical, cultural, and social aspects (Williams-Sanchez, 2021). Recently, there has been an increasing focus on comprehending the role of entrepreneurship in emerging economies, driven by evolving economic conditions and the rapid emergence of entrepreneurs in the global economy (Hamdan et al., 2022). The enduring challenge of striking a balance between economic growth and environmental preservation in emerging economies is a global concern, notably noticeable in the construction industry, where excessive generation of construction waste impedes sustainable development and harms the environment (Bao, 2023).This paper aims to investigate fundamental elements and methodological principles essential for crafting a comprehensive strategy to develop an adaptive competitive approach for enterprises venturing into foreign markets (Bortnikova & Chyrkova, 2021).

CHAPTER II DISCUSSION LO 15-1 Explain the three basic decision from must make when they decide on foreign expansion: which market to enter, when enter those markets, and on what scale. Taking a successful startup into international markets is a formidable challenge, and only a few manage to navigate it successfully (Husen & Chowdhury, 2023). Impossible Foods, a producer of plant-based meat, has successfully overcome numerous obstacles in this endeavor (Phillips-Wren et al., 2021).Key takeaways from their experience include the importance of knowing when, where, and how to launch in foreign markets, as well as the necessity of having a local team with in-depth knowledge of the specific market conditions (Laboutka, 2020). This insight also extends to the broader cultural context in which organizations operate, as they function within distinct geographic and temporal parameters (Khan et al., 2022). When entrepreneurs venture into foreign markets, it becomes imperative to deepen their understanding of cultural nuances, enabling the formulation of practical guidelines for shaping organizational culture within a different cultural setting (Szydło & Grześ-Bukłaho, 2020). Emerging economies hold significant potential for organizations aspiring to expand globally and reap the associated benefits (Zschech, 2023). However, organizations vary in their entrepreneurial inclinations when entering new markets and introducing novel products in emerging economies (Wu et al., 2021). Additionally, they differ in their capacity to effectively manage their development initiatives, encompassing various project types that contribute to success in emerging markets (Cherian et al., 2010). When companies contemplate expanding into foreign markets, they face three fundamental decisions that exert a significant impact on their success in the global arena (Sangeetha et al., 2022). The initial critical decision revolves around "which market to target." This involves a meticulous process of market selection, taking into account factors such as market size, growth potential, competition, regulatory landscape, and cultural compatibility (Gull & Idrees, 2022).. Firms must thoroughly assess which markets align with their product or service offerings, business goals, and available resources (Kiss & Ruël, 2022).Making a well-informed choice regarding market selection ensures that the company focuses on markets where authentic demand exists, and where they can effectively compete (Chen & Xu, 2022).

The second crucial decision revolves around "when to enter those markets." Timing plays a pivotal role since entering a foreign market too prematurely or belatedly can lead to adverse consequences (Chavan et al., 2022). Firms need to evaluate variables like economic conditions, political stability, and consumer demand trends in the target market. Premature entry may result in squandered resources, while late entry can result in missed opportunities (Majeed et al., 2022). A comprehensive grasp of market timing empowers companies to synchronize their entry with market conditions and their own level of readiness (Shivam & Gupta, 2023). The third foundational decision revolves around "the extent of market entry" (Kaplan, 2023) Companies must ascertain the scale of their market presence, whether through a modest entry method like exporting or a more substantial commitment in the form of joint ventures, wholly-owned subsidiaries, or acquisitions (Tchakoute Tchuigoua et al., 2022). This decision is contingent upon diverse factors, including the firm's available resources, risk tolerance, and the distinctive characteristics of the target market (Szeiner et al., 2023). The chosen scale of entry directly influences the degree of control, financial commitment, and potential rewards (Demyanchuk, 2022). Thoughtful deliberation of these three pivotal decisions—market selection, timing, and scale—lays the groundwork for a prosperous international expansion strategy (Roecker & Floriani, 2022). LO 15-2 Compare the different modes firms use to enter foreign markets Expanding a business into international markets is a highly intricate process that cannot be accomplished overnight (de Silva, 2023). Success in this endeavor requires substantial knowledge, meticulous planning, financial resources, courage, and a bit of luck (Ali, 2023). Enterprises have multiple options for entering foreign markets, each with its own advantages and disadvantages (Suhairi et al., 2023). One common approach is exporting, which entails selling products or services directly to foreign customers (Zhou et al., 2022). It is favored by many small and medium-sized enterprises due to its relatively low initial investment and risk. Nevertheless, it may offer limited control over distribution and may not be suitable for highly customized or sensitive products (Teguh Setiawan Wibowo & Dwi Bhakti Iriantini, 2022). Another option is licensing, where a firm grants foreign entities the rights to use its intellectual property or technology (Rathipriya et al., 2023). Licensing allows for revenue generation

without significant capital investment but carries risks related to intellectual property protection and limited control over how the licensed assets are utilized (Kovtunenko et al., 2021). In the pursuit of set objectives and problem-solving, the study employed general cognitive methods such as analysis, observation, and comparison (Kristoffersen et al., 2021; Singh, 2022). Additionally, structural decomposition and graphic modeling were used to develop and illustrate the proposed technology for devising an adaptive competitive strategy for enterprises entering new foreign markets. Joint ventures involve collaborating with local partners to establish a new business entity, sharing investment and local market knowledge, thereby mitigating certain risks (Singh, 2022). However, managing partnerships can be complex and require extensive negotiation and compromise (Kannan et al., 2021).Wholly-owned subsidiaries provide full control over operations in a foreign market and are suitable for companies with substantial resources and a long-term commitment. Nevertheless, they entail higher financial and operational risks and require a deep understanding of local regulations and market dynamics. These entry modes offer firms flexibility to tailor their market entry strategy according to their specific goals, resources, and risk tolerance (Madhani, 2023). Each mode comes with its own advantages and challenges, necessitating careful evaluation to align with international expansion objectives and target market dynamics (Bortnikova & Chyrkova, 2021). Franchising is another approach used by firms to expand into foreign markets (Gao & Sarwar, 2022). In a franchising setup, a firm (franchisor) licenses its business model, brand, and operational methods to independent local operators (franchisees) (Dr Girisha H et al., 2023). This allows for rapid expansion without significant capital investment and benefits from local entrepreneurial expertise (Xu et al., 2021).However, it can be challenging to maintain brand consistency and quality across diverse franchise locations and often involves ongoing support and oversight to ensure compliance with established standards (Blomstermo et al., 2020).

Strategic alliances and networks have been a recurring theme in the strategic literature for decades(Ciampi et al., 2021; Rydell, 2022). Their continued usage in a competitive world justifies the ongoing interest in these structures (Lima & Campos Filho, 2021). The choice of entry mode depends on various factors, including market characteristics, regulatory environment, industry type, available resources, and risk tolerance (Valaskova et al., 2022). Firms often use a combination of these modes to diversify their international presence and effectively manage risks (Hileman et al., 2020). LO15-3 Identify the factors that influence a firm's choice of entry mode A particular field of study holds significance because, in the event that companies involved in electromobility thrive in the market, it becomes imperative to assess their market position and the unique features of the market within which they are operating. (Ciccullo et al., 2022). The selection of an appropriate entry mode is a critical decision for any firm looking to expand into new markets (Oberdorf et al., 2021).Several key factors exert their influence in this choice. Market characteristics are of paramount importance; the firm must assess the size, growth potential, competitive landscape, and regulatory environment of the target market (Bharadiya & Bharadiya, 2023). These factors help determine whether a firm should opt for a joint venture, wholly-owned subsidiary, licensing, franchising, exporting, or another mode(Chaudhary &Alam,2022a; Yi et al., 2021).Furthermore, the firm's objectives and resource availability significantly impact the decision (Soni et al., 2021). For example, if a company aims for rapid market penetration and has substantial resources, it might prefer a wholly-owned subsidiary for greater control (Bashan & Ben Jacob, 2021). Conversely, if risk tolerance is low, a firm might opt for licensing to minimize its financial exposure. (Chinoracky et al., 2022). The study empirically investigated the impact of entry timing on the online IT service market, as well as the ways in which market characteristics can moderate these effects. (Indrajit et al., 2021).. Additionally, the regulatory environment in the target market, cultural and language factors, and the competitive landscape all play a pivotal role(Phabao et al., 2023) . Firms need to understand and adhere to local laws and regulations while adapting to the cultural nuances of the market (Cheng et al., 2022). Likewise, assessing the competitive environment helps determine how the firm can carve a niche for itself (Darshan & Gurusamy, 2022). Cost

considerations, both for market entry and ongoing operations, also guide the choice of entry mode (Kearney et al., 2021). These various factors are interrelated and require a comprehensive evaluation to ensure that the entry mode aligns with the firm's strategic objectives and the unique conditions of the target market (Yao et al., 2020). The regulatory framework of the target country can determine the feasibility and appropriateness of certain entry modes (Ghosal et al., 2021). Complex regulations may make joint ventures or strategic alliances more attractive, while industries subject to stringent local laws may prefer wholly-owned subsidiaries for better control (Phillips et al., 2021). In addition to the factors mentioned above, a firm's risk tolerance is a critical influencer in the choice of entry mode (Mulunda et al., 2021). Different modes come with varying levels of risk, which can be financial, operational, or strategic (Sihare, 2022). For instance, wholly-owned subsidiaries offer maximum control but often come with higher financial risk and resource commitment, while licensing or franchising may involve lower risk but potentially less control over the brand and operations (van Oosterhout et al., 2023). Firms must carefully assess their appetite for risk and how it aligns with their overall corporate strategy. (BORTNIKOVA & CHYRKOVA, 2021). LO15-4 Recognize the pros and cons of acquisitions versus greenfield ventures as an international market entry strategy When a firm invests in a foreign market, it has to choose between cross-border acquisition and greenfield investment (Dong & Chen, 2023). A robust relationship between market size and exchange rate with greenfield inflows rather than Mergers and Acquisitions sales is found (Moghadam et al., 2019). International markets offer significant growth opportunities for businesses, but choosing the right strategy to enter foreign markets is a strategic decision that requires careful analysis. In this paper, we examine two primary approaches: acquisition, which involves purchasing an existing company in a foreign market, and greenfield investment, which entails building new operations from the ground up(G. Said et al., 2023). Recognizing the pros and cons of acquisition and greenfield investment is key to making wise decisions when entering international markets. Factors such as a company's objectives, available resources, risk tolerance, and local market conditions play pivotal roles in the choice of the right strategy. Understanding

the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy can assist companies in making the right decision and successfully entering foreign markets (Oyewo, 2021). When contemplating international market entry strategies, organizations frequently assess the merits and drawbacks of both acquisitions and greenfield ventures (Hu & Zhu, 2022). Acquisitions, which involve a company purchasing an existing business in the target market, offer several benefits (Nthenya, 2023). They facilitate swift market entry, enabling companies to promptly establish a presence with an established customer base and operational infrastructure. Acquisitions can also provide access to local market insights through the acquired company's management and workforce (Borgi et al., 2023). However, there are drawbacks to this approach, including the potential for substantial upfront expenses associated with acquiring an established business, the intricacies of merging two distinct organizational cultures and processes, and the risk of inheriting pre-existing issues or financial burdens from the acquired entity (Valecha, 2022). Moreover, companies may need to compromise a degree of autonomy in their decisionmaking, particularly if the acquired business has its own established practices and standards (Magd & Jonathan, 2022). On the other hand, greenfield ventures involve building a new operation from scratch in the foreign market (Zheng, 2022). This strategy grants firms complete control over the business, allowing customization to align with their brand, culture, and strategic goals (Nemtsova et al., 2023). Greenfield ventures offer the potential for long-term strategic growth and may result in cost efficiencies over time. Nonetheless, they present particular challenges, such as a lengthier period required to establish a market presence due to regulatory approvals, construction, and the slower development process (García-Rivas et al., 2023). There is also a heightened level of market risk involved, given the absence of an established customer base or brand recognition. Companies must invest in gaining an understanding of local market dynamics, which can be resourceintensive, and the process of building a new operation entails hiring and training local staff, which can be time-consuming (Castro, 2022). The choice between acquisitions and greenfield ventures hinges on a firm's strategic objectives, available resources, risk tolerance, and the specific characteristics of the target market (Kobrossy et al., 2022). Thoughtful evaluation of these factors is pivotal in determining the most appropriate approach for international market entry.(Tabares et al., 2023).

LO15-5 Evaluate the pros and cons of entering into strategix afiliances when going international The body of work on strategic alliances is extensive, with a majority of authors expressing a favorable view of alliances. This can potentially mislead casual readers into having an unwarranted sense of confidence regarding the benefits of strategic alliances (Zakaria et al., 2021). While there are indeed numerous advantages associated with strategic alliances, it's important to recognize that when an organization joins such an alliance, it may have to forgo several other opportunities. Strategic alliances, such as joint ventures and partnerships, can be a viable entry strategy when going international, but they come with their own set of pros and cons. On the positive side, strategic alliances allow firms to leverage the local market knowledge and expertise of their partners (Shen, 2021). This can be invaluable in navigating complex regulatory environments, understanding local consumer preferences, and establishing distribution networks (Cano-Marin et al., 2023). Additionally, shared resources and investment can help mitigate some of the financial risks associated with international expansion. Joint ventures, in particular, facilitate risk-sharing and can be a stepping stone to wholly-owned subsidiaries, enabling a gradual transition to full control over operations. (Nilsson, 1997). The factors leading up to, the steps taken during, and the results stemming from strategic alliances are significantly influenced by the experience and backgrounds of the individuals responsible for forming these alliances.However, strategic alliances are not without their drawbacks (Al-Ababneh, 2021). One of the primary cons is the potential for conflicts and disagreements between partners, which can arise from differences in culture, management styles, and strategic objectives countries (Ebikade et al., 2021). Decision-making can become complex, and firms may need to compromise on key strategic choices. Moreover, there may be concerns about the protection of intellectual property and the risk of knowledge transfer to the partner (Korucuk et al., 2023). In some cases, joint ventures can also lead to conflicts of interest if both parties have conflicting long-term goals. It's crucial for firms to conduct thorough due diligence and establish clear agreements and governance structures to address these challenges when considering strategic alliances for international expansion. (Cavazos & Varadarajan,

2020). In conclusion, entering into strategic alliances when going international offers benefits such as risk sharing, access to local expertise, cost efficiency, and faster market entry. However, it also presents challenges related to control, conflicts, intellectual property, dependency, and trust (Mishina & Pace, 2021). Successful international expansion through alliances requires careful partner selection, clear agreements, and effective communication to maximize the advantages while mitigating the disadvantages. Another disadvantage of strategic alliances is the potential for limited control (Roth & Matherne, 2023). While they offer local insights and resources, firms may have to cede a certain degree of control over their operations or technology to their partners (Cano-Marin et al., 2023). This can sometimes lead to challenges in maintaining brand consistency and quality standards, which can be particularly concerning in industries where uniformity and consistency are essential (Mathrani & Lai, 2021). Additionally, there may be restrictions on the ability to make quick strategic changes or investments, as they often require consensus among partners. Over time, as a firm grows and gains more experience in the international market. (Daneshvar Kakhki & Shrivastava, 2023).

CONCLUSION The exploration of market penetration in both developed and emerging economies provides invaluable insights for businesses seeking to expand their global footprint. By analyzing a wide array of strategies, this study highlights key takeaways for successful market entry. In developed economies, strategies often center on differentiation and innovation, as competition is fierce, and consumer demands are well-defined. To penetrate such markets, companies should prioritize customer-centric approaches, product customization, and strong branding. Meanwhile, cost leadership strategies can be effective in price-sensitive emerging economies where market dynamics are rapidly evolving. Understanding local cultures, regulations, and the nuances of consumer behavior is paramount. A crucial consideration for market penetration is adaptability. The capacity to tailor strategies according to the economic, political, and legal nuances of the target market is indispensable. In this context, collaborative approaches such as joint ventures and strategic alliances can be advantageous, allowing businesses to access local expertise and mitigate risks. However, market penetration is not without its challenges. Regulatory compliance, cultural sensitivity, and the management of risk require careful attention. The choice between greenfield ventures, acquisitions, or partnerships depends on factors such as risk tolerance, available resources, and market characteristics. Proper market research, due diligence, and ethical considerations are non-negotiable elements of the process. In conclusion, market penetration in developed and emerging economies is a multifaceted endeavor that necessitates a comprehensive understanding of local conditions and a tailored approach. Successful market entry strategies must align with the unique requirements of each market and be underpinned by adaptability, research, and strategic foresight. Businesses that heed these insights are better positioned to navigate the complexities of global expansion and thrive in diverse economic landscapes. Market penetration strategies in developed and emerging economies showcase distinct dynamics. Developed economies, characterized by mature markets, demand a more nuanced and competitive approach. Companies here often focus on market share gains through product innovation, quality, and superior customer experiences. With intense competition and higher consumer expectations, success hinges on differentiation and sustained customer loyalty. In contrast, emerging economies are rife with untapped potential.

REFERENCE Bao, Z. (2023). Developing circularity of construction waste for a sustainable built environment in emerging economies: New insights from China. Developments in the Built Environment, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100107 Blomstermo, A., Sharma, D. D., & Sallis, J. (2006). Choice of foreign market entry mode in service firms. International Marketing Review, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330610660092 BORTNIKOVA, M., & CHYRKOVA, Y. (2021). Formation of the generalized technology for the enterprise adaptive competitive strategy development in conditions of entering new foreign markets. Economics. Finances. Law, 11/3. https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2021.11(3).3 Cavazos, C., & Varadarajan, R. (2012). Manager’s intentions toward entering into strategic marketing alliances: An empirical investigation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2012.730544 Chang, H.-J. (2022). An institutionalist perspective on the role of the state: towards an institutionalist political economy. Institutions and the Role of the State, October 1997, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782543152.00008 Cherian, J., Crooker, K. J., Knight, P., McPhaul, J. B., & Manion, M. T. (2010). Which Market Entry and Product Line Strategies Ought Organisations to Adopt for Emerging Economies? Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2010.1.1.14307 Chinoracky, R., Stalmasekova, N., & Corejova, T. (2022). Trends in the Field of Electromobility—From the Perspective of Market Characteristics and Value-Added Services: Literature Review. Energies, 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176144 Dong, L., & Chen, J. (2023). Cross-border acquisition or greenfield investment? The role of investor sentiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1085286 Feldstein, S. (2019). How artificial intelligence is reshaping repression. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0003 Hamdan, A., Ghura, H., Alareeni, B., & Hamdan, R. K. (2022). Entrepreneurship Growth in Emerging Economies: New Insights and Approaches. In Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment (Vol. 12, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1944750 Hileman, J., Kallstenius, I., Häyhä, T., Palm, C., & Cornell, S. (2020). Keystone actors do not act alone: A business ecosystem perspective on sustainability in the global clothing industry. PLoS ONE, 15(10 October). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241453 KOVTUNENKO, K., KOVALCHUK, O., & DOLOKA, R. (2021). Features of management of export-oriented manufacturing enterprise at entering foreign markets: intellectual aspect.

Economics. Finances. Law, 6. https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2021.6.1 Laboutka, T. (2020). Scaling a start-up : Launching innovative products in international markets. Mckinsey Digital - Learn to Leap #8, August. Lima, F. G. S. N., & Campos Filho, L. A. N. (2009). Mapping the Contemporary Studies on Alliances and Strategic Networks. Review of Business Management. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v11i31.140 Moghadam, A. T., Mazlan, N. S., Chin, L., & Ibrahim, S. (2019). Mergers and acquisitions and greenfield foreign direct investment in selected ASEAN Countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2019.34.4.746 Nilsson, C. H. (1997). Strategic alliances, trick or treat? The case of Scania. International Journal of Production Economics, 52(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00123- 5 Oyewo, B. M. (2021). Outcomes of interaction between organizational characteristics and management accounting practice on corporate sustainability: the global management accounting principles (GMAP) approach. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 11(4), 351–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1738141 Said, G., Azamat, K., Ravshan, S., & Bokhadir, A. (2023). Adapting Legal Systems to the Development of Artificial Intelligence: Solving the Global Problem of AI in Judicial Processes. International Journal of Cyber Law |, 4. Said, R., Bhatti, M. I., & Hunjra, A. I. (2022). Toward Understanding Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development in Developing and Developed Economies: A Review. In Energies (Vol. 15, Issue 15). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155349 Sebestyén, T., & Iloskics, Z. (2020). Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network. PLoS ONE, 15(9 september). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238626 Szydło, J., & Grześ-Bukłaho, J. (2020). Relations between national and organisational culturecase study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041522 Yao, X., Zhang, P., Lu, X., & Huang, L. (2020). Early or Late? Entry timing in online IT service markets and the moderating effects of market characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.023

THE GLOBAL TRADE TRIAD: EXPORTING, IMPORTING, AND COUNTERTRADE STRATEGIES Lecturer : Dr. Eko Handayanto, M.M. Team Group : Nofa Suci Agustina (202110160311237) Lailatul Yunifah (202110160311242) Putri Dwi Aprilia (202110160311244) MANAGEMENT STUDY PROGRAME FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG 2023

INTRODUCTION The global economy is a vast and interconnected system of international trade that spans across borders and continents (Ahi et al., 2023; Boon & Storli, 2023). At its core are three essential components: exporting, importing, and countertrade strategies (Añón Higón & Bonvin, 2023; Massini et al., 2023). These elements are the foundation of global trade, shaping the exchange of goods, services, and capital between countries (Feurtey et al., 2023). An understanding of these fundamental aspects is crucial for governments, businesses, and individuals looking to navigate the global market successfully (Cai et al., 2023). Exporting involves the sale of products and services to foreign markets, enabling countries and companies to expand their reach and tap into new opportunities (B. Li et al., 2023). Importing, conversely, is the acquisition of goods and services from foreign sources, providing access to a wider range of products and resources that might not be readily available locally (Añón Higón & Bonvin, 2023). These two facets of international trade constitute the basic flow of goods and services between nations, fostering economic growth, innovation, and competition (X. Zhou & Kang, 2023). Countertrade, though less commonly discussed, represents a strategic approach to international trade that encompasses various reciprocal agreements, including barter, offset, and buyback arrangements (Arifin et al., 2020). These unconventional trade practices serve as solutions to overcome trade barriers, currency limitations, and other challenges in global commerce (Lawal, 2022). Countertrade strategies offer distinctive ways to ensure the smoothness of international trade relationships and have gained importance in the continually evolving global marketplace (Kardanov et al., 2020). In this examination of the global trade triad, we will explore the intricacies of exporting, importing, and countertrade strategies (Arifin et al., 2021). By analyzing the underlying principles, advantages, and obstacles associated with each of these elements, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the forces shaping the international trade landscape (Kardanov et al., 2020). Whether you're a business owner looking to expand globally, a policymaker shaping trade regulations, or an individual interested in the dynamics of the global economy, this study will shed light on the complex interplay between exporting, importing, and countertrade in the modern era of international commerce (B. Li et al., 2023). Furthermore, in an era of heightened environmental awareness, this triad is not only about the exchange of goods and services but also a key factor in shaping sustainability and responsible global business practices (B. Li et al., 2023). It serves as a platform for discussions on climate-conscious trade, fair labor practices, and ethical supply chain management, further emphasizing the multifaceted nature of global trade today (Kardanov et al., 2020).

LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION The Promise and Pitfalls of Exporting In export, there is a significant opportunity to increase a company's revenue and profit base. In the export market orientation, companies rely on their perception of the environment and their knowledge of the needs, requirements, and desires of foreign consumers to adapt their products and services to that market (Naglič et al., 2020). By expanding the company's market size, it can export more on an economic scale, thereby reducing unit costs (Tahmasebi Zadeh & Boyer, 2021). Exporting, importing, and engaging in countertrade are the most commonly used methods for companies to engage in cross-border trade and expand into international markets, as seen in many small and medium-sized enterprises that utilize exportation (Marlin Steel Wire Products) (Pyroh et al., 2021). Below are various challenges faced by companies, especially novice exporters, when they attempt to engage in international trade (Torsello, 2020). Exporters face a series of obstacles and challenges in international business, including difficult market analysis due to unfavorable market conditions and limited understanding of foreign market competition, the difficulty of adapting products to the preferences of foreign customers, such as distribution issues, less effective promotions, and struggles to secure financing (Fornes et al., 2022). Additionally, time and cost become critical issues due to differences in export and import logistics processes and various trade regulations between countries, which can affect costs and consume the time required to conduct business in international markets (Djalilov & Makhmudov, 2022). The lack of knowledge and expertise in foreign markets, trade regulations, and business practices is another challenge, especially for those who are new to international markets (Eaton et al., 2022). Cultural barriers such as differing policies, customs, and business norms in foreign countries can also hinder the international trade process (Chen & He, 2020). Furthermore, the complexity of documents and formalities involved in international business can be a serious obstacle, making it essential to ensure that all document requirements are met to avoid potential costly delays and errors (Thu Luu & Duong Dang, 2023). Finally, logistics costs in export and import vary depending on the destination country, which can impact overall profitability and efficiency in international business (Hill, 2023a). To overcome these barriers, novice exporters need to take appropriate steps, such as conducting thorough market research, building an understanding of international trade rules, collaborating with export agencies or experienced business partners, and dedicating sufficient time and resources to expand business abroad(Shahid, 2022). With a well-thought-out approach and proper preparation, exporters can enhance their chances of success in international markets (Eaton et al., 2022). International Comparisons One major obstacle in exporting is the lack of awareness of available opportunities, identifying export opportunities becomes more complex due to the different cultures of

various countries, each offering potential opportunities (Buganova et al., 2023). This complexity and diversity can create some doubt for companies seeking export opportunities (Park & Islam, 2014). Countertrade transactions are used in various forms involving two or more parties that can be national or international, and this type of trade exchanges goods or services between two or more parties according to their needs worldwide (Haral, 2022a). One way to address this is by gathering information to assist small companies in identifying their export opportunities (Thu Luu & Duong Dang, 2023). Service Providers The government is responsible as the state administrator for the smooth, safe, and comfortable conduct of export and import activities carried out by importers and exporters (M Nadjhan & Sukesi, 2022). Good services are provided by both the government and private sector to the public, with or without charges, to meet the needs and interests of the public (M Nadjhan & Sukesi, 2022). Shipping companies offer services that include consolidating small shipments into larger shipments to minimize shipping costs, as well as providing valuable services to exporters, such as documentation, payment processing, and carrier selection (Kerner, 2022). Export Management Companies (EMC) provide comprehensive services to businesses that have never exported products (Gül, 2021). They handle all aspects of exports, including managing export documentation, acting as agents and distributors for the company, and selling products directly or operating sales units to process sales orders (Samiee & Chirapanda, 2019). Export Trading Companies are businesses that, through contractual agreements, identify and collaborate with foreign companies to market and sell their products (Higgins et al., 2021). They offer a comprehensive range of export services, including export documentation, logistics, and transportation (M Nadjhan et al., 2022). Export Packaging Companies, or simply export packers, offer services to businesses that are unfamiliar with exporting (Debbarma et al., 2022). Customs Brokers assist companies in avoiding errors in customs regulations (Kulimova, 2021; Medin, 2021). Many countries have specific laws and documentation rules regarding imported goods that are not always clear to exporters (Debbarma et al., 2022). Customs brokers can offer a complete service package, particularly when a company exports to numerous countries (Massini et al., 2023). Export Agents, Traders, and Resellers are companies that purchase products directly from manufacturers, customize packaging, and label products according to their own preferences and specifications (Ariningsih et al., 2021). They then sell these products internationally through their contracts and assume the associated risks (B. Li et al., 2023). Piggyback Marketing involves one company having a distribution agreement with another company (Donny Susilo, 2018). Export Strategy In addition to using export service providers, a company can mitigate the risks associated with its export strategy (Gül, 2021). The chances of export success can be significantly increased by taking several simple strategic steps, such as for novice exporters, it is advisable to hire an Export Management Company (EMC) or at least an experienced

export consultant to identify opportunities and navigate the often complex documentation and regulations involved in exporting (Tinits & Fey, 2022) (Gil-Barragan & Palacios-Chacon, 2018). Learn what it takes to succeed in one market before moving to another (Gül, 2021). Entering many markets at once risks diverting limited management resources and may result in a failure to penetrate mature markets (Samiee & Chirapanda, 2019). Most importantly, starting in a small scale provides time and opportunity to learn about the foreign country before making a significant capital commitment to that market (Kim & Lim, 2022). Exporters need to be aware of the time and managerial commitment involved in building export sales and may need to hire additional personnel (Kim & Lim, 2022). Pay significant attention to building strong and lasting relationships with local distributors and/or customers in many countries (Singh, 2012). Often, use the 3M approach by hiring local personnel to assist the company in establishing itself in foreign markets (Nakao & Asada, 2022). Local communities often have a better understanding of how business is conducted in a country than export company managers who have never set foot in that country (Prohorovs, 2023). Companies also need to be proactive in seeking export opportunities and consider the option of local production when export volumes justify it (Gül, 2021). Exporting is often not the ultimate goal but only a step toward establishing foreign production (Nakao & Asada, 2022). Expanding on these export plans and strategies for a company's opportunities, given the lack of extensive international experience and host-country market information, these steps seems logical (Samiee & Chirapanda, 2019). This choice is further reinforced by the decision-maker's tendency to maintain a status quo, affirming that the suitability of a strategy cannot be considered without a company's history and previous market approaches (Lee, 2022). Lack Of Trust The absence of confidence is a prevalent issue in personal connections, institutions, and society in general (Beam et al., 2023). Confidence is a vital element in maintaining strong relationships and efficient collaboration (Musarra et al., 2022). When trust is absent, it can result in various complications, such as breakdowns in communication, decreased cooperation, subpar decision-making, heightened stress and conflicts, and the gradual deterioration of relationships (Samhale, 2022). Distrust can cause individuals to become wary of the intentions and actions of others, leading them to maintain some emotional distance (Samhale, 2022). Trust plays a pivotal role in establishing robust, secure, and rewarding relationships, as every relationship hinges on trust (Beam et al., 2023). However, there are occasions when trust is not as genuine or straightforward as it should be (Musarra et al., 2022). When one or both individuals begin to question their partner's behaviors, words, or actions, it can give rise to what are commonly referred to as trust issues (Samhale, 2022). Businesses engaged in global trade need to place their confidence in individuals or entities they might not have encountered previously (Lal et al., 2023). These individuals reside in foreign nations, communicate in diverse languages, and operate within legal

frameworks that might not be uniform or consistently adhered to (Beam et al., 2023). Assessing whether these individuals or entities will meet their responsibilities can pose a significant challenge (Samhale, 2022). Letter Of Credit A Letter of Credit (LC) is a widely employed financial tool in global commerce that aids in the smooth conduct of transactions between purchasers and vendors, especially when they operate in distinct nations (Bärtl & Krummaker, 2020). It acts as an assurance provided by a financial institution or bank, ensuring that the seller will receive payment from the buyer once specific requirements are met and designated documents are submitted (Z. Li & Ye, 2021). The way LC works is starting from agreement, issuance of LC, terms and conditions, shipment and documents, and payment (Seroja et al., 2023). Draft A draft is commonly linked to bank-related transactions, enabling you to provide written instructions to your bank for making payments to others (de Lucio & MoraSanguinetti, 2022a). On the other hand, a money order is a prepaid payment tool frequently employed for smaller, secure transactions and is available for purchase at various locations (Kraemer et al., 2020; Park & Islam, 2014; Singh, 2012). The decision between these options hinges on the particular transaction and the preferences of those involved (Osinga et al., 2021a). In the realm of international trade, it is common practice to utilize money orders for the completion of trade transactions (de Lucio & Mora-Sanguinetti, 2022b). This diverges from domestic procedures, where sellers typically dispatch goods on an open account basis and subsequently provide a commercial invoice specifying the amount owed and the payment terms (Schclarek & Xu, 2022). In domestic deals, buyers often gain ownership of goods without formal documentation that acknowledges their commitment to make payment (Schclarek & Xu, 2022). Nevertheless, in the context of international trade, due to the trust issues involved, payment or a formal commitment to pay is a prerequisite before the buyer can take possession of the merchandise (Schclarek & Xu, 2022). There are two primary types of drafts: sight drafts, which are payable as soon as they are presented to the drawee, and time drafts, which allow for a delay in payment, typically within periods like 30, 60, 90, or 120 days (Schclarek & Xu, 2022). Upon receipt, a time draft transforms into a promise of payment from the recipient (Park & Islam, 2014). When a money order is drawn and accepted by a bank, it is referred to as a banker's acceptance (Osinga et al., 2021). When a business entity receives it, it is known as a trade acceptance (Eaton et al., 2022). Bill Of Lading The third important document in international trade financing is the bill of lading, which is provided to the exporter by the shipping company responsible for transporting the goods (Hill, 2023b). Bill of Lading is a multifaceted document used in international shipping and trade (Kardanov et al., 2020). This document has three primary roles: it acts as a

definitive acknowledgment of the goods being loaded, it outlines or represents the conditions of the transportation agreement, and it functions as a document signifying ownership of the goods, in line with the nemo dat rule (Kulińska & Giera, 2019). Its significance extends to trade finance, legal protection, and dispute resolution in the realm of international logistics (Allen et al., 2022). In its capacity as a contract, a bill of lading delineates the carrier's obligation to furnish transportation services in return for an agreed-upon fee (Wu et al., 2022). In its role as a title document, it can be employed to secure payment or a written promise to pay before the goods are transferred to the importer (Y. Zhou et al., 2023). Furthermore, a bill of lading can function as collateral that the exporter's local bank can utilize to extend funds, either prior to or during the shipment process, and before the importer's ultimate payment is received (Singh, 2012). A Typical International Trade Transaction It's important to note that international trade transactions can be complex and are subject to various legal and regulatory considerations, including international trade laws and treaties (Nucci et al., 2023; Sa’idah & Suryanto, 2023). Additionally, currency exchange rates and fluctuations, political and economic factors, and cultural differences can influence the process (Broby, 2022). Many parties involved in international trade, such as banks, shipping companies, and customs brokers, play critical roles in ensuring the smooth flow of goods and payments across borders (Eaton et al., 2022). Export Credit Insurance Export Credit Insurance, also referred to as Trade Credit Insurance or Export Credit Agency (ECA) Insurance, serves as a financial instrument and risk management tool utilized by businesses engaged in global trade (Lal et al., 2023). Its primary function is to offer safeguarding against the potential of non-payment by foreign buyers and a range of political and commercial risks associated with exporting goods or services to international markets (Añón Higón & Bonvin, 2023). When there is an absence of a letter of credit, exporters become vulnerable to the possibility of non-payment by foreign importers (Taskinsoy, 2023). To mitigate this vulnerability, exporters may opt to invest in export credit insurance (Qin et al., 2022). This insurance offers protection in the event of customer default, with the insurance company assuming the majority of the financial losses (Nucci et al., 2023). Countertrade Countertrade is a trade method that encompasses the exchange of goods or services among multiple parties, tailored to their specific requirements, and it doesn't involve the use of money or currency for payment (Haral, 2022). This process is carried out in accordance with the relevant countertrade guidelines and regulations in the countries participating in the transaction (Arifin et al., 2020). Countertrade serves as an alternative approach to structuring international sales (Arifin et al., 2021). In countertrade, it essentially involves a barter-like

system, where goods and services are swapped for other goods and services when monetary exchange is not feasible (Torsello, 2020). Countertrade strategies come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages (Haral, 2022b). On one hand, they can help countries overcome trade barriers and promote economic cooperation (Torsello, 2020). However, they also introduce complexities and challenges in areas such as assessing value, managing logistics, and handling multiple trade partners (Haral, 2022b). Countertrade remains a vital tool in the realm of international trade, allowing both nations and businesses to navigate the complexities of global commerce when traditional trading methods face restrictions or obstacles (M Nadjhan et al., 2022). It requires a deep understanding of trade regulations, proficient negotiation skills, and the capacity to adapt to the specific conditions of each trade agreement (M Nadjhan et al., 2022). The Popularity Of Countertrade The prevalence of countertrade has experienced fluctuations over the course of global economic history (Zhu et al., 2023). Countertrade gained significant traction in the 1960s and endured for several decades (Wu et al., 2022). However, its popularity may have dwindled due to the heightened liquidity of international financial markets and the broader adoption of currency convertibility (Y. Zhou et al., 2023). In the contemporary era, where international financial resources are more accessible, the practice of countertrade may not be as widespread as it was in earlier times (Shinde et al., 2023). On the other hand, countertrade is experiencing a resurgence in the business world. The concept of countertrade is actually much more common than we might think (Joshi, 2022). Some marketing tools, like advertising, have been in use for centuries, even possibly for thousands of years (X. Zhou & Kang, 2023). Ancient Greeks also used advertising as a commercial strategy (Lal et al., 2023). At that time, merchants would contract "message carriers" to promote their products (Thu Luu & Duong Dang, 2023). There are many changing factors that can influence the market, such as trends or technological advances (Y. Zhou et al., 2023). If we disregard these factors, they can have a serious impact on the market, even threatening the existence of a brand (Joshi, 2022). Nevertheless, countertrade can still be used in specific situations where access to foreign currency or trade financing becomes difficult (Haral, 2022a). Therefore, the popularity of countertrade can vary depending on the current economic conditions and the international financial market (Torsello, 2020). Types Of Countertrade The prevalence of countertrade has experienced fluctuations over the course of global economic history (Fujishige & Yang, 2022a). Countertrade gained significant traction in the 1960s and endured for several decades (Zhu et al., 2023). However, its popularity may have dwindled due to the heightened liquidity of international financial markets and the broader adoption of currency convertibility (Wu et al., 2022). In the contemporary era, where

international financial resources are more accessible, the practice of countertrade may not be as widespread as it was in earlier times (Wu et al., 2022). This barter system also relies on trust and mutual benefit and often involves bilateral relationships built on personal connections (Fujishige & Yang, 2022a; Taskinsoy, 2023). Barter is one of the forms of trade that emerged before the invention of currency, and its roots can be traced back to primitive communities (Haral, 2022a). It can also be stated that in barter markets, various goods that are difficult to divide into homogeneous parts are usually encountered (Wu et al., 2022). Initially, each individual in the market had their own set of goods and had the ability to obtain other goods without using a medium of exchange like money (Khlevniuk, 2023; Mr. Shubham Kadoo & Ms. Khushboo Sodi, 2023). Participants have general preferences for various goods they are interested in (Wu et al., 2022). The cause of random decentralization is likely to lead to an allocation very close to the core Markovian allocation, which is a distribution based on the rational considerations of each individual, ensuring Pareto efficiency and stability against possible changes in coalitions, compared to the allocations they currently have, not based on their initial funds (Skrastins, 2023). This allocation has been shown to be the natural result of the decentralization process in the maritime sector (Fujishige & Yang, 2022b). Counter-Purchase is a form of countertrade where two parties involved in a trade agreement agree to carry out two separate transactions (Hill, 2023b). Counter-purchase is often used in international trade, especially when one party is trading with a country with currency constraints or other payment limitations (Shinde et al., 2023). Counter-purchase can be seen as a way to overcome these barriers and allows both parties to continue their trade while also having an agreement with the other party to purchase unrelated products in the same transaction (Haral, 2022a). Counter-purchase transactions involve two separate payments, similar to two different contracts (Lawal, 2022; Nakao & Asada, 2022). Agreed-upon prices are most likely conducted in stable currencies (Thu Luu & Duong Dang, 2023). Therefore, the fundamental principle is that different prices for counter-purchase contracts should be agreed upon in the same currency to minimize the impact of exchange rate fluctuations and maintain transaction stability (Haral, 2022a). Offset, in the context of trade, refers to the practice where two parties engaged in a trade transaction, such as the purchase of weapons or military equipment, agree to compensate for the purchase of the products or services by making investments or purchases equivalent to the other party in the country making the purchase (Hill, 2023b). This provides a dual benefit where the buying country gets the products or services they need, while the producing country of the weapons gets economic benefits from additional investments or transactions (Lawal, 2022). Moreover, offset practices can help reduce trade deficits and create job opportunities in the local industrial sector (Torsello, 2020). Switch Trading, also known as "switching," involves the utilization of a third party, often referred to as a trading house, in the execution of countertrade agreements (Andia et al., 2022). This credit can be employed to procure goods from the same country (Khlevniuk,

2023). Switch trading comes into play when a third party, the trading house, acquires the buyback credit from the company and subsequently sells it to another company that can make more effective use of it (Skrastins, 2023). Pros And Cons Of Countertrade Countertrade offers a major benefit in providing a financing avenue for companies engaged in export transactions, particularly when conventional financing options are unavailable (Haral, 2022b). Many developing countries face challenges in accumulating the necessary foreign exchange to cover import costs, making countertrade the only viable method for conducting business in these nations (Arifin et al., 2020). Even when alternative methods exist for settling export deals, many countries favor countertrade over cash transactions (Torsello, 2020). Consequently, a company declining to participate in a countertrade agreement may forfeit opportunities to compete in the export market, as competitors who embrace such agreements are willing to seize those opportunities (Haral, 2022b). Moreover, countertrade agreements are often mandatory requirements imposed by the destination country's government for the export of goods or services by a company (Hill, 2023). However, countertrade agreements come with substantial drawbacks (Haral, 2022b). Companies typically prefer to receive payment in hard currency (Torsello, 2020). Countertrade contracts may involve the exchange of goods that are either unusable or of subpar quality, which cannot be profitably disposed of by the company (Hill, 2023).

CONCLUSION In the realm of international trade, the concept of the Global Trade Triad encompasses three core strategies: exporting, importing, and countertrade. These strategies are pivotal in facilitating the flow of goods and services across international boundaries, ultimately contributing to economic advancement. Exporting involves the sale of products and services produced in one country to customers in another, enabling businesses to expand their markets and cater to foreign consumer demand. Successful exporting necessitates extensive market research, product adaptation to align with foreign preferences, and the navigation of regulatory and logistical hurdles. Importing, conversely, entails the procurement of foreign goods and services for domestic consumption. It grants countries access to a diverse array of products and services that may not be readily available or economically viable to produce domestically. Importing also promotes international collaboration, fostering economic benefits and product diversity. Countertrade strategies, on the other hand, are innovative approaches to international trade, typically employed when conventional exporting and importing methods are not suitable or advantageous. These strategies encompass barter, counterpurchase, offset, and buyback arrangements, and they help entities overcome financial or trade imbalances, foster cooperation, and cultivate partnerships with foreign counterparts.

REFERENCES Ahi, A. A., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). E-commerce Policy and the Global Economy: A Path to More Inclusive Development? Management International Review, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00490-1 Allen, F., Qian, M., & Xie, J. (2022). Implicit benefits and financing. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 52(October), 101000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2022.101000 Andia, T., Mantilla, C., Morales, Á., Ortiz, S., & Rodríguez-Lesmes, P. (2022). Does price-cap regulation work for increasing access to contraceptives? Aggregate- and pharmacy-level evidence from Colombia. Social Science and Medicine, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115312 Añón Higón, D., & Bonvin, D. (2023). Digitalization and trade participation of SMEs. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00799-7 Arifin, Z., Suman, A., & Khusaini, M. (2020). Countertrade mechanism of global arms trade: Case study of Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n1p307 Arifin, Z., Suman, A., & Khusaini, M. (2021). Optimization of Selected Agricultural Export Commodities to Improve Indonesia’s Weaponry Countertrade. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.67 Ariningsih, E., Saliem, H. P., Maulana, M., & Sari Septanti, K. (2021). Agribusiness Performance of Gedong Gincu Mango and Its Potential as a Superior Agricultural Export Product. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 39(1). Bärtl, M., & Krummaker, S. (2020). Prediction of claims in export credit finance: a comparison of four machine learning techniques. Risks, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8010022 Beam, E. A., Masatioglu, Y., Watson, T., & Yang, D. (2023). Loss aversion or lack of trust: Why does loss framing work to encourage preventive health behaviors? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics , 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102022 Boon, M., & Storli, E. (2023). Creating global capitalism: An introduction to commodity trading companies and the first global economy. Business History, 65(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2023.2172163 Broby, D. (2022). The use of predictive analytics in finance. Journal of Finance and Data Science, 8, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2022.05.003 Buganova, A., Banerji, D., & Buganova, S. (2023). SME Internationalization as a Puzzle of Cultural and Bilateral Distances: Using the Eisenhardt Approach. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779231189013 Cai, W., Geng, Y., Li, M., Gao, Z., & Wei, W. (2023). Mapping the global flows of steel scraps: an alloy elements recovery perspective. Environmental Research Letters, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf2ad Chen, T., & He, C. (2020). A review on geographies of international trade. Progress in Geography, 39(10). https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.10.012

de Lucio, J., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2022a). Drafting “better regulation”: The economic cost of regulatory complexity. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.10.003 de Lucio, J., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2022b). Drafting “better regulation”: The economic cost of regulatory complexity. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.10.003 Debbarma, J., Choi, Y., Yang, F., & Lee, H. (2022). Exports as a new paradigm to connect business and information technology for sustainable development. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100233 Djalilov, F., & Makhmudov, S. (2022). Effects of import practices and logistics services on export valuation in macroeconomic processes. Economics and Innovative Technologies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.55439/eit/vol10_iss6/a20 Donny Susilo. (2018). Piggyback Strategy: A Solution to Boost Internationalization of Small and Medium Enterprises in Indonesia. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(6). Eaton, J., Kortum, S. S., & Kramarz, F. (2022). Firm-to-Firm Trade: Imports, Exports, and the Labor Market. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4031195 Feurtey, A., Lorrain, C., McDonald, M. C., Milgate, A., Solomon, P. S., Warren, R., Puccetti, G., Scalliet, G., Torriani, S. F. F., Gout, L., Marcel, T. C., Suffert, F., Alassimone, J., Lipzen, A., Yoshinaga, Y., Daum, C., Barry, K., Grigoriev, I. V., Goodwin, S. B., … Croll, D. (2023). A thousand-genome panel retraces the global spread and adaptation of a major fungal crop pathogen. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36674-y Fornes, G., Cardoza, G., & Altamira, M. (2022). Do political and business relations help emerging markets’ SMEs in their national and international expansion? Evidence from Brazil and China. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2020- 0058 Fujishige, S., & Yang, Z. (2022a). Barter markets, indivisibilities, and Markovian core. Bulletin of Economic Research, 74(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12279 Fujishige, S., & Yang, Z. (2022b). Barter markets, indivisibilities, and Markovian core. Bulletin of Economic Research, 74(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12279 Gil-Barragan, J. M., & Palacios-Chacon, L. A. (2018). Export intensity of SMEs from emerging markets: A configurational analysis. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 19(3). Gül, S. (2021). Domestic demand and exports: Evidence from Turkish firms. Central Bank Review, 21(3), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2021.07.001 Haral, A. A. (2022a). Theory of countertrade ; a Look into Advantages of different types of Countertrade. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom, 1(01), 36–64. Haral, A. A. (2022b). Theory of countertrade ; a Look into Advantages of different types of Countertrade. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom, 1(01), 36–64. http://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/3

Higgins, M. J., Lacombe, D. J., Stenard, B. S., & Young, A. T. (2021). Evaluating the effects of Small Business Administration lending on growth. Small Business Economics, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00291-1 Hill, C. W. L. (2023a). International Business: Competing in Global Marketplace. In McGraw Hill LLC. Hill, C. W. L. (2023b). International Business: Competing in Global Marketplace. In McGraw Hill LLC. Joshi, J. (2022). A study on impact of international marketing on local and international players and its impact on consumers. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(April), 5723–5735. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns1.6254 Kardanov, V. A., Kulik, V. N., Petrova, T. A., & Vulshonok, V. V. (2020). ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE OF EXPORT AND IMPORT OF GOODS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Vestnik Universiteta, 1. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-1-100-107 Kerner, R. (2022). SERVICE EXPORTERS IN ICT-INDUSTRIES: MEASURING DIGITAL SERVICE TRADE OF ESTONIA. Estonian Discussions on Economic Policy, 30(1–2). https://doi.org/10.15157/tpep.vi1-2.22091 Khlevniuk, O. (2023). Plan and market in the Soviet economy: Barter transactions in the 1930s-1950s. Cahiers Du Monde Russe, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/monderusse.13949 Kim, K., & Lim, G. (2022). International Dynamic Marketing Capabilities of Emerging-Market Small Business on E-Commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010010 Kraemer, K., Jakelja, L., Brugger, F., & Nessel, S. (2020). Money Knowledge or Money Myths? Results of a population survey on money and the monetary order. In Archives Europeennes de Sociologie (Vol. 61, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975620000119 Kulimova, Kh. M. (2021). Procedure for monitoring tax control in export- import operations. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2021.01490.7 Kulińska, E., & Giera, J. (2019). Identification and Analysis of Risk Factors in the Process of Receiving Goods into the Warehouse. Foundations of Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2019-0009 Lal, M., Kumar, S., Pandey, D. K., Rai, V. K., & Lim, W. M. (2023). Exchange rate volatility and international trade. Journal of Business Research, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114156 Lawal, S. A. (2022). a Critical Analysis of Point of Sales (Pos) Types and Their Efficiency for Business. International Journal of Eminent Scholars, 8(1). Lee, K. J. (2022). CROSS-MARKET IMPACT OF PLATFORMS’ ACTIVITIES: A SECONDARY RELEVANT MARKET APPROACH. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhac004 Li, B., Ng, S. J., Han, J. C., Li, M., Zeng, J., Guo, D., Zhou, Y., He, Z., Wu, X., & Huang, Y. (2023). Network evolution and risk assessment of the global phosphorus trade. Science of the Total Environment, 860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160433

Li, Z., & Ye, H. (2021). Credit constraint and firm’s export mode choice. China Economic Quarterly International, 1(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2021.01.002 M Nadjhan, & Sukesi. (2022a). The Effect of Public Service Delivery on Export Import Business Satisfaction Through Customs Declaration Online at The Regional Office of The Directorate General of Customs and Excise Jatim I Surabaya. Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen, 12(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.25139/sng.v12i1.5689 M Nadjhan, & Sukesi. (2022b). The Effect of Public Service Delivery on Export Import Business Satisfaction Through Customs Declaration Online at The Regional Office of The Directorate General of Customs and Excise Jatim I Surabaya. Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen, 12(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.25139/sng.v12i1.5689 M Nadjhan, Sukesi, Samiee, S., Chirapanda, S., Naglič, A., Tominc, P., Logozar, K., Eaton, J., Kortum, S. S., Kramarz, F., & Haral, A. A. (2022). International Marketing Strategy in Emerging-Market Exporting Firms. Organizacija, 53(1), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4031195 Massini, S., Piscitello, L., & Shevtsova, Y. (2023). The complementarity effect of exporting, importing and R&D on the productivity of Ukrainian MNEs. International Business Review, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102055 Medin, H. (2021). Customs brokers as intermediaries in international trade. Review of World Economics, 157(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00396-w Mr. Shubham Kadoo, & Ms. Khushboo Sodi. (2023). An Analysis of Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin and the Future. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-8157 Musarra, G., Kadile, V., Zaefarian, G., Oghazi, P., & Najafi-Tavani, Z. (2022). Emotions, culture intelligence, and mutual trust in technology business relationships. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181(May), 121770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121770 Naglič, A., Tominc, P., & Logozar, K. (2020). The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Export Market Orientation, Market Diversification, and Export Performance. Organizacija, 53(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2020-0015 Nakao, M., & Asada, T. (2022). Purchase of government bonds by a supranational central bank: its impact on business cycles. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-021-00207-3 Nucci, F., Pietrovito, F., & Pozzolo, A. F. (2023). Intermediated trade and credit constraints: The case of firm’s imports. International Economics, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2023.08.003 Osinga, A. J., Schauten, M. B. J., & Zwinkels, R. C. J. (2021a). Timing is money: The factor timing ability of hedge fund managers. Journal of Empirical Finance, 62(April), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.04.007 Osinga, A. J., Schauten, M. B. J., & Zwinkels, R. C. J. (2021b). Timing is money: The factor timing ability of hedge fund managers. Journal of Empirical Finance, 62(April), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.04.007 Park, H. M., & Islam, M. T. (2014). The potential and limitations of a public mobile payment service: Did Bangladesh electronic money transfer system make a difference in “unbanked” communities? Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2014.