GUAGUA ELEMENTAR SCHOOL
Y
19 01
GUAGUA, PAMPANGA
S. Y. 2015 – 2016
Step 1: Get Organized Step 5: Do
ana
Step 2: Talk with
Customers Step 6:
Sol
Step 3: Walk the Process
Step 7:
Step 4: Identify priority Imp
improvement Pla
areas
o root cause Step 8: Pilot Your
alysis Solution
: Develop Step 9: Roll Out
lutions your Solution
: Finalize Step 10: Check
provement Your Progress
an
SCHOOL PROFILE:
TOTAL POPULATION OF GUAGUA ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
MALE =1.079
FEMALE= 1,016
TOTAL = 2096
MALE FEMALE
TEACHER – I =
TEACHER – II =
TEACHER- I II =
MASTER TEACHER I =
MASTER TEACHER II =
TOTAL POPULATION OF GUAGUA ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL MALE =1.079
FEMALE= 1,016
TOTAL = 2096
MALE FEMALE
TEACHER – I =
TEACHER – II =
TEACHER- I II
MASTER TEACHER I =
MASTER TEACHER II =
ACHIEVEMENTS
GUAGUA E LEMENTAR SCHOOL MERYLIN
Y Process
19 01
GUAGUA, PAMPANGA
MYRA M. CANLAS MYLENE M
Facilitator Team L
CONRADO G. ANONUEVO BENITA M
Comm
Scribe
M. ROQUE
s Owner
M. DAVID CRESENCIA M. CUENCO
Leader Process Observer
MAY M. LAYUG MARISSA M. MARTIN
munications
Documentation
NUMBER OF GARBAGE SACKS CONSUMED
ROOMS/BLDGS NO. OF CLASSES 0-5 6-10
ONE 10 18
TWO 8 14
THREE 8 27
FOUR 8 35
FIVE 8 35
SIX 8 24
4
RELIEVING TCHRS 12
ROOMS 1
55 00
CANTEEN
13 73 SAC35K
TOTAL
PER GRADE LEVEL 16-20 NO. OF CLASSES
11-15 IDENTIFIED WITH
MOST GARBAGE
10
31 10
31 8
31 4
31 6
31 3
2
10 1
10 1
KS EVE18 RYDA5Y 35
GRAPH 1: PERCENTAGES OF GARB
18
16 12
14
12 10
10
8
6
4
2
0
PLASTIC CUPS USED PAPERS
Graph 1 shows the corresponding percentages/a
clearly shows that JUNKFOOD WRAPPERS as the var
during class hours.
BAGES FOUND AROUND THE SCHOOL
18
NO.OF SACKS USED
JUNKFOOD
WRAPPERS
amount of garbage found around the school. It
riables which cannot be monitored and controlled
8
What are the sou
waste residuals in
E/S?
What are the actio
be done to minimiz
the identified proble
urces of
n Guagua
ons must
ze/reduce
em?
TABLE 1: RESULTS OF THE FGD
Among GES TEA
N=
FACTORS CONSIDERED UNDERLYING CAUSES OF TOO
MUCH GARBAGE IN GUAGUA E/S
1. ENVIRONMENT
Street/Sidewalk Vendors
College Canteen
Outsiders/Visitors (On-Seminars etc.)
2. AMONG PUPILS
Laziness
Pabebe Pupils
Lack of Concern, Love & Affection
ANSWERS TO QUESTION NO. 1
ACHING FORCE
60
Weight (%) No. of Responses
40% 24
57% 34
26% 16
17% 10
60% 36
17% 10
66% 40
17% 10
TABLE 2: RESULTS OF THE FGD
Among GES TEA
N=
MEASURES TO BE EMPLOYED FOR THE PROJECT
1. ADDITIONAL WASTE BIN SUPPLIED
2. INCENTIVE SCHEMES
3. STRENGTHENING OF PROJECT
EDiWOW
4. INNOVATIVE APPROACH TOWARDS
GARBAGE DISPOSAL
Table 2 shows the results of FGD Answers to que
Innovative approach in garbage disposal should be
of the said project.
ANSWERS TO QUESTION NO. 2
ACHING FORCE
60
Weight (%) No. of Responses
100% 60
80% 48
90% 54
100% 60
estion No. 2 in which additional waste bins and
e brought out in order to identify the effectiveness
arbage REDUCE / 32 out
sposal MINIMIZE of 55
WASTE classes
STEPS
CLEANLINES
S&
HEALTH
AWARENESS
on Programs were not No Concrete
gation developed among System of
astes Garbage
cleanliness Collection
awareness
Conduct orientation and
Develop sense of respo
the school and environm
Enhance the knowled
cleanliness and health
Help parents realize
cleanliness
Give time in developing
d awareness campaign
onsibility and concern for
ment
dge of the pupils on
e the importance of
the health habits.
Free will dispo
among stak
OBSERVATION CONSOLIDATION OF
AND SURVEY THE RESPONSES
osal of Waste
keholders
COMPUTE IDENTIFYING
PERCENTAGE THE CAUSES
Non Se
of
Gather alternative Gather princip
means in regarding
cleanliness
disposing waste
egregation
Wastes
ples Follow the strategies
and activities suggested
s by the Stakeholders
Awareness Campaign Involve b
about segregation of stakehol
waste throug
meetin
Non participative
Stakeholders
both Plot a concrete system
lders suggested/brought out by
gh
ngs both stakeholders
Identify existing Researc
strategies about pro
disp
Programs were
not developed
among
cleanliness
awareness
ch more Work collaboratively with
oper waste stakeholders
posal
Use observation Suggest innov
forms in ways in dispo
implementing garbage
strategfes
’
Non Compliance
of Programs in
minimizing waste
vative Implement fully the
osing Interventions and
Innovations to be
undertaken
Free will Non N
disposal of Segregation of parti
Stake
Waste Wastes
Dev
Identify Conduct Awar
CAUSES Orientation Campaig
OBSERVATION AND INSETS Awareness
SURVEY about segr
Gather alternative
CONSOLIDATION OF means in disposing wa
THE RESPONSES
waste Involv
COMPUTE stakeh
PERCENTAGE Gather principles through
regarding
IDENTIFYING THE cleanliness
CAUSES
Follow the strategies and Plot a con
activities suggested by the suggested/
by both st
Stakeholders
Non Programs were Non Compliance
icipative not developed of Programs in
eholders minimizing waste
among
velop cleanliness Monitor
reness awareness Basura Mo,
gn/System Garden ko
Develop an
s Campaign approach towards Use observation forms
regation of in implementing
aste pupils health strategfes
Identify existing
strategies
ve both Research more Suggest innovative
holders about proper ways in disposing
meetings waste disposal
garbage
ncrete system Work
/brought out collaboratively Implement fully the
takeholders with stakeholders Interventions and
Innovations to be
undertaken
Non – Compliance
among 32 o
24 out of 32 or 75% am
embraced the Intervent
PROJECT EDiW
e of strategies planned
out of 55 classes.
mong 55 classes have fully
tion to be used in making
WOW successful