Post-submission typographical amendments from Submission ...

Post-submission typographical amendments from Submission Core Strategy

This includes corrections to typographical errors in the Submission Core Strategy

Ref Section/Policy Page Para Proposed Change Reason for change Further Is further SA
South graph Regulation required?
PEMT1 Oxfordshire: (in March 27
PEMT2 issues and trends 2011 2.2 Add apostrophe to ‘districts’ in second line, thus: Typographical error publication No
PEMT3 South strike- district’s required? No
PEMT4 Oxfordshire: through No No
issues and trends version) 2.5 Add ‘the’ before ‘existing transport network’ on 5th line Typographical error No No
The Vision and No
Objectives 5 Objective Delete the duplicated ‘that’ from bullet (iv) of Objective Typographical error No No
The Vision and 1 1. Typographical error changed No
Objectives 6 Para. 3.14 In the section ‘At and around Didcot’ amend bullet (ii) to to reflect the other towns No No
20 read: No No
22 Para 4.10 Identify land for a further 2330 new houses homes by Typographical error changed No No
Table 5.1 2027 to be consistent about No No
PEMT5 The Overall 25 9.18 Change 8,800 houses to homes references to homes No
Strategy Para 9.21 To be clear about the area No
PEMT6 Moving around 36 9.28 and Add to title outside SVUK area referred to
PEMT7 Didcot 72 footnote Change 3,342 of these houses to homes Typographical error changed
83 to be consistent about
PEMT8 Didcot 74 10.21, Change feasability to feasibility references to homes
PEMT9 Didcot 76 10.22 and Change South Oxfordshire Sport and Leisure Typographical error
Strategy to South Oxfordshire Leisure and Sports Typing error changed to
PEMT10 Henley 82 Facilities Strategy correct the name of the
Change South Oxfordshire Sport and Leisure document
Strategy to South Oxfordshire Leisure and Sports Typing error changed to
correct the name of the

Post submission typographical amendments to the Submission Core Strategy – June 2011

Ref Section/Policy Page Para Proposed Change Reason for change Further Is further SA
graph document Regulation required?
PEMT11 Thame (in March 27
PEMT12 Wallingford 2011 footnote Facilities Strategy publication No
PEMT13 Policy CSR1 strike- 96 Change South Oxfordshire Sport and Leisure required? No
through 11.19, Strategy to South Oxfordshire Leisure and Sports No
Housing in version) 11.20 and Facilities Strategy Typing error changed to No No
Villages footnote10 Change South Oxfordshire Sport and Leisure correct the name of the No
88 4 Strategy to South Oxfordshire Leisure and Sports document
93 12.17, Facilities Strategy No
95 12.18 and Reinstate original footnotes to policy: Typographical error changed No
footnote *Equivalent to 5-6 houses homes to correct the name of the
109 **Equivalent to 2-3 houses homes document

PEMT14 The Environment 102 Para Change Correct earlier change which No
14.15 Proposals that affects MSAs was an error. No
CSQ2 (iv) For the refurbishment of existing residential In this case the word houses
buildings it can be demonstrated that the proposal will not homes is needed to
achieve at least EcoHomes ‘Very Good’ standard*. convey the scale of
From 2013, proposals will need to demonstrate that at acceptable development
least ‘Excellent’ standard* will be achieved. Typographical error

PEMT15 Quality 104 To update the policy No
Development requirement’s name.

PEMT16 Implementation of 123 Table 18.2 At bottom of policy *Or equivalent standard through Remove inconsistency and No
the strategy the forthcoming BREEAM Residential change target to relate better
Refurbishment standards”. with policy CSDID3, housing

CSDID2 – Land to the East of the Orchard change
target as follows:
A mixed use development on land to the east of the

Post submission typographical amendments to the Submission Core Strategy – June 2011

Ref Section/Policy Page Para Proposed Change Reason for change Further Is further SA
graph Regulation required?
(in March 27
2011 Table 18.2 Orchard Centre to be completed by 2016 to have been trajectory and table 18.1 publication No
strike- given planning permission and be delivering on site Remove inconsistency and required?
through in 2016/17 change target to relate better No No
version) with policy CSDID3, housing No
CSDID3- New housing at Didcot change target as trajectory and table 18.1 No
PEMT17 Implementation of 123 follows: No
the strategy To meet Core Strategy housing requirements for Didcot No

(6300 dwellings between 2006 and 2027) New
greenfield neighbourhood to be released in
2012/13

PEMT18 Implementation of 125 Table 18.2 Correct title of policy CSTHA2 in Table 18.2 to CSTHA2 Typographical error corrected No
the strategy Table 18.2 – Greenfield neighbourhood to be built in accordance to match title of Policy No
with agreed timings northwest Thame CSTHA2
PEMT19 Implementation of 124 Remove inconsistency and
the strategy CSTHA2 – Greenfield neighbourhood northwest Thame change target to relate better
change target as follows: with Policy CSTHA2, housing
trajectory and table 18.1
New greenfield neighbourhood to be released by 2012
2013/14 to be built by 2020/21

PEMT20 Implementation of 125 Table 18.2 Correct title of policy CSWAL2 in Table 18.2 to Typographical error corrected No
the strategy Table 18.2 CSWAL2 – Greenfield neighbourhood to be built in to match title of Policy No
accordance with agreed timings west of Wallingford CSWAL2
PEMT21 Implementation of 125 Table 18.2 Remove inconsistency and No
the strategy CSWAL2 – Greenfield neighbourhood west of change target to relate better
Wallingford change target as follows: with Policy CSWAL2, housing
PEMT22 Implementation of 129 trajectory and table 18.1
the strategy New greenfield neighbourhood to be released by
2013/14 Typographical error

Correct title of policy CS1 to CSC1 – Contingency and
phasing

Post submission typographical amendments to the Submission Core Strategy – June 2011