Buku Pengurusan 2021i

Discussion of Teachers’ Organization 1230

2. Language

1 Did the video critique team comment on the 1230

appropriateness of the presenter’s vocabulary

for the audience’s prior knowledge?

Discussion of Teachers’ Language 1230

3. Strategy 1230
1230
1 Did the video critique team identify the 1230
different instructional strategies the teacher
used to reach the instructional objectives?
Describe.

2. Did the video critique team discuss the
appropriateness of the amount and depth of
content for the students’ prior knowledge?

Discussion of Teachers’ Instructional
Strategies

4. Diversity

1 Did the video critique team comment on 1230

whether the presenter defined new terms and

used examples from multiple theories and

perspectives?

2. Did the video critique team comment on and 1230
describe the teacher’s use of examples from

multiple theories and cultural perspectives, as

well as concrete examples of abstract

LAMPIRAN 42

concepts?
Discussion of Teachers’ Attention to Diversity 1 2 3 0

5. Audiovisual

1 Did the video critique team critically evaluate 1230
the degree to which the audiovisual aids
complemented the material presented rather
than replacing it?

2. Did the video critique team comment on the 1230

orientation of the presenter in the presence of

the AV aids (i.e. whether the presenter

continued to face the audience, rather than the

AV aids, when the aids were presented)?

3. Did the video critique team discuss whether 1230
the AV aids contained too much content for
the audience to attend to them and maintain
their attention on the presenter?

Discussion of Teachers’ Audiovisuals 1230

6. Time Management

1 Did the video critique team note whether the 1230
presentation maintained a consistent pace
from beginning to end and concluded within
the allotted time?

2. Did the video critique team note whether the 1230

presenter provided the students with sufficient

time to process new information and integrate

with their prior knowledge?

3. Did the video critique team make note of 1230

whether the presenter provided sufficient time

to include and address audience questions

during the presentation, afterward, or both?

LAMPIRAN 43

Discussion of Teachers’ Time Management 1230

7. Active Inquiry

1 Did the video critique team note whether the 1230

presenter used questions to assess students’

prior knowledge and understanding of the

material being presented?

2. Did the video critique team note whether the 1230
presenter handled all questions openly and 1230
objectively?

Discussion of Teachers’ Use/Handling of
Questions

8. Delivery

1 Did the video critique team comment on the 1230
presenter’s deliberate versus unconscious

body movement to engage the audience?

Describe.

2. Did the video critique team comment on the 1230

presenter’s use of his/her voice to engage the

audience, as well as refraining from using
audible pauses (e.g. “um,” “uh”)? Describe.

Discussion of Teachers’ Content Delivery 1230

LAMPIRAN 44

Summary
1. Organization
2. Language
3. Strategy
4. Diversity
5. Audiovisuals
6. Time Management
7. Active Inquiry
8. Delivery

Total Score

LAMPIRAN 45

LAMPIRAN 46

SEKOLAH : LAPORAN REFLEK
TINGKATAN / KELAS : KOMEN
MATA PELAJARAN :
TAJUK :
TARIKH :

ASPEK
1. Rancangan Mengajar /

Lesson Plan

2. Isi Kandungan / Konten

3. Soalan-soalan yang
dikemukakan : Aras dan
kesesuaian

4. Keberkesanan Bahan
Bantu Mengajar

KSI LESSON STUDY
CADANGAN UNTUK MENAMBAHBAIK RPH

LAMPIRAN 36

5. Penglibatan Murid

6. Respon/Jawapan Murid

7. Teknik Pengajaran dan
Hasil Pembelajaran
Murid

8. Lain-lain

Nama ahli kumpulan Lesson Study :
1.
2.
3.
4.

Nama Pakar Rujuk (Knowledgeable Others) :
Pencatat :

5.
6.
7.
8.

LAMPIRAN 37

FORMAT PELAPORAN PLC Sesi Perkongsian Guru
(Teacher Sharing Sessions)
Sesi Perkongsian Guru

Nama Ahli Kumpulan:

Tempat/Tarikh/Masa:
Fokus: Nyatakan fokus perkongsian yang dijalankan

Interpretasi: Apakah aspek yang paling penting/menarik/relevan yang dibincangkan? Adakan

perkongsian ini boleh memberi impak kepada pembelajaran murid? Bagaimana?

Hasil: Apa yang saya pelajari? Bagaimanakah perbincangan ini boleh memberi kesan kepada

profesionalisme saya?

LAMPIRAN 46

RUJUKAN NOMBOR FAIL PANITIA MATA PELAJARAN

BIL NO FAIL MATA PELAJARAN
1 600-3/2/5
2 600-3/2/6 BAHASA MELAYU
3 600-3/2/7
4 600-3/2/10 BAHASA INGGERIS
5 600-3/2/11
6 600-3/2/12 BAHASA CINA
7 600-3/2/13
8 600-3/2/14 MATEMATIK
9 600-3/2/15
10 600-3/2/17 SAINS
11 600-3/2/23(1)
12 600-3/2/23(2) PENDIDIKAN ISLAM
13 600-3/2/23(3)
14 600-3/2/24 PENDIDIKAN MORAL
15 600-3/2/28
16 600-3/2/29 SEJARAH
17 600-3/2/30
18 600-3/2/31 REKA BENTUK & TEKNOLOGI
19 600-3/2/32
20 600-3/2/35 PENDIDIKAN JASMANI & KESIHATAN
21 600-3/2/58
22 600-3/2/59 PERNIAGAAN
23 600-3/2/60
PERAKAUNAN

EKONOMI

SAINS KOMPUTER

KIMIA

MATEMATIK TAMBAHAN

BAHASA JERMAN

FIZIK

BIOLOGI

PENDIDIKAN SENI VISUAL

GEOGRAFI

REKA BENTUK GRAFIK DIGITAL

SAINS RUMAH TANGGA

LAMPIRAN 47