The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

environmental impact assessment kenmare moma titanium minerals project mozambique power line from nampula to the mine site volume 4: environmental management plan

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by , 2016-02-04 05:57:03

KENMARE MOMA TITANIUM MINERALS PROJECT IN MOZAMBIQUE

environmental impact assessment kenmare moma titanium minerals project mozambique power line from nampula to the mine site volume 4: environmental management plan

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
KENMARE MOMA

TITANIUM MINERALS PROJECT
MOZAMBIQUE
POWER LINE

FROM NAMPULA TO THE MINE SITE
VOLUME 4:

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Prepared by
Coastal & Environmental Services

P.O. Box 934
Grahamstown

6140
South Africa

Prepared for
Kenmare Resources P.L.C.

Chatham House
Chatham Street

Dublin 2
Ireland

October 2002

Reports produced as part of this EIA:
Volume 1: Scoping and Terms of Reference
Volume 2: Specialist Reports
Volume 3: Environmental Impact Report
Volume 4: Environmental Management Plan
Volume 5: Comments Report

This report should be cited as: Coastal & Environmental Services (2002)
Environmental Management Plan of a power line between Nampula and
Moma for the Kenmare Moma Titanium Minerals Project. Volume 4:
Environmental Management Plan. Coastal & Environmental Services,
Grahamstown.

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1
1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Background To The Project ....................................................................................... 1

2. PROCESS AND STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
3

2.1 Environmental Management Process ......................................................................... 3
2.2 Environmental Management Plan Development........................................................ 3

3. PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................ 7
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 7
3.2 Description Of The Route .......................................................................................... 7
3.2.1 The power line................................................................................................ 7
3.2.2 Power line servitude ....................................................................................... 8
3.2.3 Power line access roads.................................................................................. 9

4. THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT BETWEEN NAMPULA AND THE
KENMARE MINE SITE ...................................... 11

4.1 The Natural Environment......................................................................................... 11
4.1.1 Climate ......................................................................................................... 11
4.1.2 Vegetation .................................................................................................... 11
4.1.3 Current land use ........................................................................................... 11
4.1.4 Fauna ............................................................................................................ 12

4.2 The Socio-Economic Environment .......................................................................... 12
4.2.1 Historical and current setting ....................................................................... 12
4.2.2 Settlements ................................................................................................... 12
4.2.3 Household livelihood strategies ................................................................... 13
4.2.4 Graves........................................................................................................... 13

5. POLICIES, LEGISLATION AND STANDARDS .................... 15
5.1 Corporate Policies .................................................................................................... 15
5.1.1 Health and safety policy............................................................................... 15
5.1.2 Environment policy ...................................................................................... 15
5.1.3 Community policy........................................................................................ 16
5.2 Legislative Framework............................................................................................. 16

6. FORMAT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ............ 19

7. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ............................... 21

8. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .... 23
8.1 Management Structure And Reporting .................................................................... 23
8.1.1 Organisational structure ............................................................................... 23
8.1.2 Kenmare resources team .............................................................................. 23
8.1.3 Contractor’s construction team .................................................................... 23
8.1.4 Independent monitoring team....................................................................... 23
8.1.5 Reporting guidelines .................................................................................... 24
8.1.6 Specific roles and responsibilities ................................................................ 24
8.2 Performance Objectives And Targets ...................................................................... 26
8.3 Continuous Improvement......................................................................................... 26

Table of Contents i

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

8.4 Reporting And Documentation ................................................................................ 26
8.5 Environmental Incident Management ...................................................................... 26
8.6 Emergency Preparedness.......................................................................................... 27
8.7 Auditing And Review............................................................................................... 27
9. REFERENCE LIST ......................................... 29
10. DEFINITION OF ACRONYMS ................................. 31
APPENDICES .............................................. 33

ii Table of Contents

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE

This document describes the strategy for the environmental management during the design,
construction and operation phases of the Moma power line by Kenmare Resources plc
(hereafter referred to as Kenmare).

This document, developed by Coastal & Environmental Services for Kenmare Resources plc,
is the official submission of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to the Ministry for
the Co-ordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA), and is submitted in accordance with
Chapter V of the Environmental Law of Mozambique (Decree no 76/98 of 29 December),
which states that an environmental licence is required for new projects. A condition thereof
involves an evaluation of the impacts of the development on the environment by means of an
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Article 6 provides guidelines on the study of
impacts on the environment, and lists the minimum requirements of the EIA. Line 2e of
Article 6 states that the preparation of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP), including
the monitoring of impacts, and accident prevention and contingency plans is required as part
of the EIA.

1.2 SCOPE

This EMP represents a statement of intent by Kenmare Resources plc and outlines the
company’s commitment to addressing the potential negative and positive environmental
impacts associated with the proposed power line. This EMP addresses the activities associated
with the design, construction and operation of the 110kV power line from an existing
substation near Nampula to a substation that will be constructed on the Kenmare Moma mine
site.

1.3 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT

Kenmare has been involved in developing a heavy mineral sands project in north eastern
Mozambique for over 10 years. A site that showed potential was identified north east of the
town of Moma and a significant pre-feasibility study was conducted on the Moma mineral
sands deposit in the late 1990s. When the project moved into a full feasibility phase, an
environmental impact assessment (EIA) was commissioned and Coastal & Environmental
Services (CES) was appointed as independent consultants to undertake the EIA as required by
the Government of Mozambique. The project will involve the investment of over US$ 150
million.

A variety of components of the project will require power to enable operation. A dedicated
power line, 167km long extending from an existing substation near Nampula to a substation
that will be constructed on the Moma mine site, has been proposed (Figure 1.3).

There are several small villages along the route, although the only major town the line passes
is Nametil. The proposed power line will traverse two large rivers on its route to the coast,
namely the Larde and Meluli, and cut through various vegetation types.

Introduction 1

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

A

Nampula Pemba
Nacala

Zambezi River Pebane Study Area Alto Molocue
Moma

Quelimane

Beira Indian
Save River Ocean

Limpopo River

Maputo

Figure 1.3: Map indicating the straight line template corridor of the powe
at the Moma mine site.

2

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Nampula B

Murrupula Liupo

Nametil

Angoche

Mine Site Major towns

Moma Indian Minor villages
Ocean Roads
Power line
Proposals

er line extending from Nampula substation to the proposed new substation

Introduction

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

2. PROCESS AND STRUCTURE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS

The generally accepted world best practice sequence for implementation of environmental
management processes associated with large projects is:

1. Pre-feasibility Environmental Assessments: These are undertaken to identify critical
environmental issues that could be regarded as fatal flaws.

2. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs): These are traditionally carried out at
project level and are used to identify and assess potential impacts and mitigation
measures.

3. Environmental Management Plans (EMPs): These are traditionally used to identify,
implement, maintain and monitor detailed mitigation measures aimed at
reducing/managing the potential impacts during all phases of a project (viz design,
construction and operation1).

4. Environmental Management System (EMS): This is aimed at ensuring that the
environmental aspects associated with the operational phase of a project are effectively
managed and monitored.

5. Closure and Rehabilitation Plans (CRPs): These outline the procedures required to
close and rehabilitate an operation once activities have ceased.

The following environmental studies have been undertaken for the Kenmare Moma Power
Line:

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SUBMITTED TO MICOA IN
NOVEMBER 2001)
1. Volume 1 – Scoping and Terms of Reference Report
2. Volume 2 – Specialist Studies Report
3. Volume 3 – Environmental Impact Report

• Environmental Management Plan (this document)

2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

This EMP is based on an approved format and builds on the findings of the EIA undertaken
for the Kenmare Moma Power Line, and provides a framework to ensure that:

• Recommendations contained in the EIA are put into effect timeously in order to
manage impacts (e.g. during the design, construction and operation of the project).

• Outstanding issues from the EIA are addressed and resolved.
• Assumptions contained in the EIA are tested and verified.

Therefore this EMP identifies the required mitigation measures that are needed in order to
reduce negative impacts and enhance positive ones. It ensures that all mitigatory measures
and recommendations identified during the EIA, and post-EIA, are incorporated into a single
document so that they can be considered during the various phases of the project (i.e. design,
construction, operation and decommission). These mitigatory measures will be the

1 Operational EMPs are commonly known as Environmental Management Systems. 3

Process and Structure of EMP

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

responsibility of a number of people, for example the proponent and their consultants,
authorities, contractors and environmental consultants.
This EMP is designed to ensure that Kenmare and their contractors are aware of the
environmental responsibilities that they have, and that MICOA has a clear record of the
standards and intentions of Kenmare’s environmental programme, against which they can be
held accountable. Specifically this EMP is designed to ensure that:

• During project design, all mitigatory measures identified during the EIA, which
could be incorporated into the design of the project, are considered during the
detailed design phase.

• During construction, all constraints, restrictions and actions required to minimise
construction impacts are implemented.

• During commissioning and operation, detailed operating procedures are developed
so that all constraints, restrictions and actions required to minimise impacts caused
by commissioning and operation are developed, implemented and monitored for all
areas. These will form part of an operational EMS based on the ISO 140012
framework.

• During the life of the project, Kenmare will continue to enhance positive impacts
and ensure mitigation for negative impacts. An important component of this is the
monitoring, evaluation and communication of findings and adherence to the
principle that Kenmare through the EMPs and EMS will strive for continued
improvement.

An important point to note is that the project is continually developing and therefore the
specific and detailed technical and procedural requirements for achieving the proposed
mitigation measures outlined in the EMP will also continue to be developed. Therefore
provision is made for the evolving nature of the project without compromising its
environmental management requirements. The EMP described in this document is therefore
part of a larger environmental management programme, which will continue to evolve as the
project develops, and will be reviewed internally, updated periodically and audited externally.

Part of this ongoing environmental programme (see Figure 2.2a) will be to produce a specific
construction EMP, which will contain the specific directives to Kenmare and their contractors
in the form of Environmental Action Plans (EAPs). These EAPs will provide the specific
detail for managing construction issues and can only be concluded during final design of the
project. During the construction phase an operational EMP (also termed an EMS) will be
finalised for the operational phase. Finally, during the operational phase a Closure and
Rehabilitation3 Plan (CRP) will be finalised and submitted to MICOA for approval4.

2 The International Organisation of Standards (ISO) developed the ISO 14001 framework in order to certify
Environmental Management Systems and standardise their application.
3 It should be noted that rehabilitation is an ongoing activity and is therefore covered in the Construction EMP
and Operational EMS as well as the Closure and Rehabilitation Plan.
4 This would most likely involve the handover of the line to EDM on mine closure.

4 Process and Structure of EMP

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Design Phase EIA recommendations Kenmare is
here
Legislative EMP

Environmental Submit to Authorities Acquire Environmental License
Approval

Final Design Phase

Final Design Construction EMP Engineer: Final Technical Design
Phase Formulation (incorporates all the
environmental design
Construction EAPs – Formulation
(outlines interface between contractor requirements into final design)

and environmental requirements) Engineers

Construction Formulate Implementation of External audit of
Phase Operational EMS construction EMP and contractors activities
and compliance
and EAPs EAPs

Operational Undertake Operational EMS Formulate Closure and Obtain MICOA
Phase and EAPs Rehabilitation Plan Approval

Closure Implement closure plan External audit of
Phase closure activities

Figure 2.2a: Outline of Kenmare’s ongoing environmental programme5.

5 It must be noted that while there are specific deliverables, the programme should be seen as a dynamic process
with ongoing liaison between the environmental and technical managers.

Process and Structure of EMP 5

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

3. PROJECT OVERVIEW

3.1 INTRODUCTION

The mining operation, bore field, accommodation village, mineral separation plant and
tailings areas will all consume a large quantity of power. The total power requirements of the
project are in the region of 20 megawatts, most being used by the dredge, concentrator and
mineral separation plant. This will necessitate the construction of a power line to deliver
power from an existing substation near Nampula to a substation that will be constructed on
the Moma mine site. Power will be transmitted through a 110kV line and the line will be
approximately 167km in length.

3.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE ROUTE

3.2.1THE POWER LINE
The proposed power line extends from an existing substation near Nampula to a substation
that will be constructed on the Moma mine site. The additional equipment required at the
Nampula substation is not predicted to require any additional area, while the terminal
substation at the mine site still needs to be constructed and will have a footprint of between
1 200m2 and 1 800m2, but will be positioned within the boundaries of the project site.

The conductors require a minimum ground clearance of 6.3m, which needs to be increased to
7.5m over roads. This ground clearance requires a tower height of 24m. The cable lengths will
be approximately 3km long, and the towers will be positioned approximately 300m apart over
level terrain, although this may vary in areas with raised terrain.

The foundations of the towers are dependent on the soil types, but a typical foundation for
each leg of a tower would involve a 1.5m square concrete block. The depth and the degree to
which it is submerged will be dependent on the soil type and groundwater in the region.
Within floodplain areas the foundations will need to be designed to handle flood conditions
and will thus be elevated above the ground.

Two similarly designed tower types have been proposed, an “S” or “S10” tower (Figure 3.2a).
Both tower types are self-supporting, steel lattice structures with similar dimensions. The final
towers used may vary slightly, but will have similar dimensions to the designs shown. The
tower heights are approximately 24m, although this can be extended in 3m steps by an
additional 9m if required. The base width of the towers is 2m or 4m for the “S” and “S10”
designs respectively. Both tower types have a strut width of 6m and will have the conductors
suspended from insulators, which in turn are suspended from the tower struts. The insulator
structure is uncertain at present, but will either be linear or vee string.

Project Overview 7

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Figure 3.2a: The two different tower types suggested for the proposed power line.
3.2.2POWER LINE SERVITUDE
The power line servitude will be a 30m wide area centered on an 8m wide core area, which
will be cleared to grass level. On either side of the core area there will be an additional 11m
wide area within which no trees or structures greater than 3m high will be allowed. In addition
any trees or structures outside of this servitude deemed unstable, and therefore a potential risk
to the power line, will also be cut back to a height that will prevent the object from being a
risk to the line. The construction of the towers will require an area approximately 20m by
20m, while drum stations will require slightly larger areas of vegetation clearance,
approximately 30m by 30m (Figure 3.2b).

8 Project Overview

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

20x20m Core servitude=8m. Vegetation 20x20m
clearing to grass level.

Servitude width=30m. Clearing of vegetation to 3m in height.

Figure 3.2b: Diagrammatic indication of the vegetation clearing for the proposed power line
servitude.

The drum stations will be situated approximately every 3km along the route for the
positioning of drum trailers and winches. The additional areas required during the
construction of the pylons and for the drum stations will be allowed to revert to their natural
state on completion of construction.

3.2.3POWER LINE ACCESS ROADS
Along most of the route use will be made of existing roads, which will be well maintained.
Additional access points will be built where necessary, and any roads used during the
construction of the line will most likely be retained for use during operations and
maintenance. New roads that cross over wetland areas will either be removed and
rehabilitated or designed in such a way that they do not impede water flow. This will involve
the insertion, correct placement and maintenance of culverts.

Project Overview 9

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

4. THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT BETWEEN NAMPULA
AND THE KENMARE MINE SITE

4.1 THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

4.1.1CLIMATE
The climate of Mozambique is sub-tropical with hot summers and warm to hot winters, and is
influenced by the warm Mozambique current. Two distinct seasons are distinguishable, the
rainy season and the warm dry season. The rainy season usually commences abruptly in
December and extends to April. About 75% of the total annual rainfall occurs during this
period, causing hot, humid conditions. Annual rainfall at Quelimane (about 300km south east
of Moma) is almost 1.400mm, but in the project area is likely to be about 200mm less. The
warm dry season at the coast extends from May to November. Only the months of September
and October are truly “dry” at the coast. Periodic cyclones sweep the Mozambique Channel
during this period, occasionally reaching the coast and bringing very heavy rainfall.

4.1.2VEGETATION
Vegetation patterns in the study area are fairly complex due to human-induced disturbance
and alteration of natural patterns. Five dominant vegetation units were identified, namely:

• Coastal Evergreen Forest covering 0.4% of the route
• Miombo Woodland covering 7.3% of the route
• Secondary Savanna covering 57.5% of the route
• Rivers, Wetlands and Moist Grassland, together covering 11.5% of the route
• Rural Village-Agricultural Mosaic, covering 20.6% of the route.

The Secondary Savanna community covers the largest area within the study area, which is an
indication of the impact that the local people have had on the area. Wetlands and drainage
areas form a network throughout the study area. Moist Grassland occurs near the mine site
within the Larde River floodplain, and surrounds the Coastal Evergreen Forest. Miombo
Woodland occurs in two main areas along the power line.

4.1.3CURRENT LAND USE
The dominant land use categories in this study area are:

• Scattered rural residential areas
• Towns or cities (Nametil and Nampula)
• Fields cultivated for subsistence crops (cassava, rice, beans)
• Cashew plantations

The area is predominantly dominated by scattered rural residences and fields cultivated for
subsistence crops. The only significant concentrations of people are in Nampula city and
Nametil. As the Moma line will connect with the existing Nampula substation, on the
outskirts of the city, it will have limited impacts on the population of Nampula.

Affected Environment between Nampula and the Kenmare Mine Site 11

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

4.1.4FAUNA
The fauna within the region of the proposed power line route is typical of a disturbed area,
consisting of many widespread species and an absence of large mammals. Mozambique has a
diverse amphibian fauna and 35 amphibian species may possibly occur in the Nampula-Moma
region. There are no endemic Mozambican amphibians and none are listed as threatened.
Several species of frogs with restricted ranges do occur in Mozambique, but extend into
adjacent regions. Due to the uniform habitats in the Nampula-Moma region, only a limited
number of reptiles are likely to occur, with only approximately 12 taxa endemic to the
country. No Mozambican terrestrial reptiles are listed as threatened, and no endemic species
occur in the area.

A diverse avifauna occurs in Mozambique, but certain groups of birds, otherwise widespread
in Mozambique, are absent or very uncommon in the Nampula-Moma region. They include
hornbills, raptors and game birds. Eight of the birds observed in the Nampula-Moma region
are listed in threatened or near-threatened categories. The long history of agriculture in the
region has resulted in a significant decline in the number and diversity of forest and woodland
birds and mammals. None of the few mammals still surviving within the study area are
endemic, or included in the Red List or placed in CITES appendices.

4.2 THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

4.2.1HISTORICAL AND CURRENT SETTING
Mozambique ended its post-independence war in 1992 with the signing of the Rome Peace
Accord. Prior to this accord the country had been subjected to a violent and protracted war
between the armies of Frelimo and Renamo. Thousands of Mozambicans lost their lives,
many more fled their homesteads and fields and the country’s economy was devastated.
Despite recent growth, the country continues to depend on foreign assistance to balance the
budget. The Kenmare project is a major investment into the country. It is anticipated that the
project will generate significant export revenues once full production is reached. In addition
to the direct returns from the tax base, there will be additional indirect as well as induced
economic benefits.

4.2.2SETTLEMENTS
The power line route will pass through 5 districts in Nampula Province as well as Nampula
City. Nampula Province is predominantly rural. However, the power line route avoids the
urban areas and therefore the people who will be affected by the route will generally be rural
people.

The power line route will affect 450 people, 110 homesteads and 115 structures, all of which
will need to be relocated away from the 30m servitude. The relocation will generally only be
short distances (>100m), which should not result in a significant impact on the social fabric of
the area.

12 Affected Environment between Nampula and the Kenmare Mine Site

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Table 4.2: Magnitude of displacement.

District No of Households
Nampula 31
Meconta 25
Mogovoras 31
Angoche 3
Moma 20
TOTAL 110

In addition to those to be resettled, it is anticipated that a number of homesteads will be
affected:

• Either through having to be relocated to make way for access roads required for the
construction of the power line.

• Or by having trees or crops destroyed during the course of construction of the power
line. In particular trees beneath the power line will have to be removed during the
construction phase.

4.2.3HOUSEHOLD LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES

The majority of people living along the power line are rural, with their range of economic
survival strategies being constrained by the limited nature of the economic base.

Traditional lifestyles along the power line involve a continuing process of competition
between demands for the household to engage in cash-generating activities and demands to
engage in food-producing activities. A range of factors ultimately determines household
activities and priorities, including:

• Household size and demographic composition,
• Household location,
• Economic differentiation between households,
• Variations in traditional rights to resources such as land, and
• The general local and regional economic climate.

4.2.4GRAVES

No major cemeteries appear to be impacted upon by the power line and only a few grave sites
associated with individual homesteads appear to be potentially affected by the development.
Graves can be left underneath the power line and most likely will not have to be moved.
Where possible, the positions of pylons will be adjusted, should they overlap with grave sites.

Affected Environment between Nampula and the Kenmare Mine Site 13

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

5. POLICIES, LEGISLATION AND STANDARDS

5.1 CORPORATE POLICIES

Kenmare will develop detailed company policies that ensure sustainable development and
operation, and will strive to develop the project in a way that meets the needs of the present
generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.

Corporate policies will include Health, Safety, Environment and Community responsibilities,
which will ensure continual improvement in their performance, efficient use of natural
resources and avoid or mitigate potentially adverse effects on local communities and the
environment. Kenmare’s approach will be based on the requirements of internationally
recognised standards, and will take into account the policies of the World Bank and the
International Finance Corporation.

5.1.1HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY

Kenmare’s Health and Safety Policy will seek to ensure the health and safety of the local
community, employees and contactors. To fulfill this commitment Kenmare will:

1. Strive to identify and assess potential risks and hazards early and manage them in
a way that avoids or mitigates adverse effects.

2. Set targets and objectives that seek to reduce the risk of harm to the community,
employees and contractors.

3. Monitor risks and reassess risk, thereby aiming to improve results continuously.
4. Train employees to ensure that they have the right skills and competencies.
5. Develop an emergency response programme/preparedness plan to deal with

potential risks.

5.1.2ENVIRONMENT POLICY

The conservation of the environment is essential for long term sustainable development.
Kenmare recognise that their activities have the potential to cause environmental harm, and
their aim will be to reduce the impact on the environment over time. To fulfill this
commitment Kenmare will:

1. Comply with all current laws, regulations, international conventions and specific
licence conditions.

2. Apply the precautionary principle approach to environmental management in order
to ensure opportunities for environmentally sustainable development.

3. Set environmental standards and targets to assess performance.
4. Assess potential impacts and ensure continual improvement by monitoring

performance and reassessing targets.
5. Integrate environmental factors into design, construction, operation and

decommission.
6. Ensure the protection, maintenance and rehabilitation of the environment.
7. Promote environmental awareness of employees and contractors through training.
8. Develop an emergency response programme/preparedness plan to deal with

potential risks.

Policies, Legislation and Standards 15

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

5.1.3COMMUNITY POLICY
Kenmare’s community policy will aim to ensure that the local community will benefit from
development projects, and that potentially adverse effects on the local populous are prevented
or mitigated. Kenmare will ensure that:

1. The project fosters full respect for the community’s dignity, human rights and
cultural uniqueness.

2. Employees and contractors act sensitively and respectfully.
3. The local communities do not suffer adverse effects during the project, and that

they receive culturally compatible social and economic benefits from the proposed
project.
4. Communities are incorporated into the project development process by identifying
and addressing their preferences and concerns through consultation, and the
incorporation of local knowledge into the development.
5. Community development is encouraged and supported.
6. There is no discrimination in employment practices and no forced or child labour.
7. Communities that are unavoidably resettled are compensated.
8. Alternative economies that attract investment and employment are encouraged, so
that the post-mining economy is sustainable.

5.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK

The legislation applicable to the Kenmare Project, as a whole, is summarised in Table 5.2 and
includes:

• The Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique (1990)
• The Mining Act (Law 2/86 of 16, 1986, as amended by Law 5/94 of September

18, 1996)
• The Environmental Act (Law 20/97, October 1, 1997)
• The Land Act (Law 19/97 of October 1, 1997)
• The Water Rights Act (Law 16/91, August 3, 1991)
• The Labour Act (Law 8/98 of July 20, 1998)

The legal framework for environmental protection in Mozambique is based on policy
instruments and internal instructions from MICOA. Currently the granting of an
environmental licence is dependent on the completion of an Environmental Impact
Assessment and the preparation of an Environmental Management Plan. Accordingly, this
EMP meets all legal obligations.

This EMP recognises all legal instruments presently in force in Mozambique. This
preliminary legal review will be updated during the annual reviews of the Environmental
Management System so as to ensure that it remains compliant with Mozambican legislation
and the requirements of EDM.

16 Policies, Legislation and Standards

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Table 5.2: The main legislation applicable to the environmental management of the
Kenmare power line.

Safety
• Labour Act (Law 8 /98 of July 20, 1998)
• Decree on labour inspection offices regulations (Decree 32/89 of November 8, 1989)
• Legislative Diploma on health and safety in working places (Legislative Diploma 48/73
of July 5, 1973)
• Ministerial Diploma on technical safety in underground and surface mining works
(Ministerial Diploma 96/81 of December 16, 1981)
• Legislative Diploma on professional accidents and diseases (Legislative Diploma 1706 of
October 19, 1957)

Environment
• Environment Act (Law 20/97 of October 1, 1997)
• Regulation on the Process of Environment Impact Assessment Study (approved by
Decree Nº 76/98 of December 29, 1998)
• Land Act (Law 19/97 of October 1, 1997)
• Land Act Regulation (approved by Decree 66/98 of December 8, 1998)
• The National Environmental Policy (approved by Resolution of the Council of Ministers
5/95 of August 3, 1995)
• Water Resources Act (Law 16/91 of August 3, 1991)
• Mining Act Regulation (Decree 13/87 of February 24, 1987 as amended by Decree 53/94
of November 9, 1994 and Decree 21/95 of July 25, 1995)
• Ministerial Diploma on technical safety in underground and surface mining works
(Ministerial Diploma 96/81 of December 16, 1981)
• Decree on protection against pollution of waters, beaches and coastline in Mozambique
(Decree 495/73 of September 20, 1973)
• Portaria establishing the regulations on the transportation, handling and transit of
dangerous cargo in the ports of Mozambique (Portaria 18 891 of September 27, 1965)
• Legislative Diploma on Forests Regulations (Legislative Diploma 2642 of September 20,
1965)
• Decree establishing rules to protect the soil, flora and fauna in the overseas provinces
(Decree 40040 of February 24, 1955)
• Draft Internal Administrative Regulations from MICOA named Environmental
Regulations on Mining Exploitation and Development of Mineral Deposits in
Mozambique (“Regulamento Ambiental sobre Extracção Mineira e Desenvolvimento de
Depósitos Minerais em Moçambique”)

Policies, Legislation and Standards 17

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

6. FORMAT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT PLAN

This EMP is structured so that the key environmental components are directly linked to the
activity areas of the project. The key environmental components include:

1. Water issues (Appendix 1)
2. Economic issues (Appendix 2)
3. Waste disposal issues (Appendix 3)
4. Dust and atmospheric emission issues (Appendix 4)
5. Ecological issues (Appendix 5)

These environmental components are linked to the following project activities:
1. Servitude clearing
2. Access roads
3. Tower erection
4. Conductors

Impacts relating to a specific environmental component are grouped together, so that all the
mitigation measures required to manage specific activities of the power line are clearly
identified. This will ensure that causes of possible non-compliance during monitoring can be
traced, and ensure that all environmental requirements of a project activity have been or are
being met.

The tables have six column headings, which are explained below.

a. EMP Reference Number: This column is used to give each proposed mitigation
measure or "management statement" a unique number for ease of reference.

b. EIA Reference: This column provides a reference to the EIA documentation in
which the environmental impact and related mitigation measures were identified
and explained. This ensures easy cross-referencing.

c. Impact: This column lists the impacts identified for a particular project activity.
d. Management Statement: This column specifies the proposed mitigation measures

for the impacts.
e. Responsibility: This column suggests the appropriate professionals in the project

team or authority responsible for managing the specific mitigation measures.
Shared responsibility indicates the importance of interaction between the different
professional groups on the project team and authorities during all phases of the
project.
f. Phase: This column depicts the phase of the project (Design, Construction or
Operation) when the mitigation measure must be addressed or implemented:

• Design is the phase when final design for construction must be
undertaken.

• Construction implies the completion of design and the start of
construction, which extends until the completion of the commissioning of
the various facilities.

• Operations begin after commissioning and extend for the life of the
project.

Format of EMP 19

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

7. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

The final detailed monitoring requirements will be refined as relevant information becomes
available during the design and construction stage. The objectives of the monitoring
programme are to:

• Demonstrate that Kenmare has operated in accordance with all of the conditions
in the EIA and that control structures and programmes are operating consistently
with these conditions.

• Provide timely, relevant and appropriately presented information within the
company, to the regulatory authorities and the general public on the
environmental performance of the operation.

The following will be monitored with regard to the Kenmare Moma power line:

1. Roads: Condition of existing access roads and routes during construction.
2. Rehabilitation: A programme to monitor the effectiveness of the rehabilitation of

access roads, lay down areas and camps will be established once rehabilitation
commences.
3. Bird Mortality: A formal partnership between Kenmare and a Mozambique
conservation agency will be developed to aid in assessing the long term
significance of bird mortalities on existing and proposed lines.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation of the Resettlement and Compensation Plan (RCP):
Kenmare site management will undertake ongoing monitoring, evaluation and
review of the Resettlement and Compensation Plan (RCP). Annually there will be
a site self-assessment carried out by trained employees of Kenmare, and an audit
carried out by a credible independent agency. Initially these activities will focus,
among other things, on ensuring:

o The correct entitlements are delivered to the affected households.
o Disputes and grievances are dealt with promptly and efficiently.
o The effectiveness of the resettlement.

Environmental Monitoring 21

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

8. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

8.1 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE AND REPORTING

8.1.1ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
The generic key management positions to manage the EMP are discussed below. The actual
titles used for each position and the precise responsibilities may change during the final
design phase. The main parties involved will be Kenmare as the client and a contractor who
will build the line. The construction rather than the operation of power lines are generally
responsible for most of the impacts and thus emphasis is placed on the role of the contractor.

8.1.2KENMARE RESOURCES TEAM
Kenmare – Construction Manager (K-CM)
The role of the K-CM will be to ensure that all personnel on site abide by the requirements of
the EMP and that all areas of the project are constructed and operated in such a manner that it
meets all specified legal and contractual environmental requirements. The K-CM is the most
senior figure on site.

Kenmare – Technical Managers (K-TM)
The role of the Technical Managers will be to ensure that the line is designed, constructed and
operated to meet the specified contractual and legal requirements. The K-TMs will report
directly to the K-CM.

Kenmare – Environmental, Health, Safety & Community Manager (K-EHSC)
One of the Kenmare Technical managers will be the EHSC Manager. The K-EHSC will be
based on site and will report directly to the K-CM. This manager will specifically manage the
EHSC issues during the construction phase and ensure that the contractor is meeting all the
necessary requirements.

8.1.3CONTRACTOR’S CONSTRUCTION TEAM
Contractor – Environmental Site Officers (C-ESO)
The exact composition of the contractor’s team can only be established once the contractor is
selected. The contractor will, however, be required to appoint environmental site officers who
shall be responsible for undertaking a daily site inspection to monitor compliance with the
specifications.

Contractor – Chief Engineer/Project Manager (C-CE)
It is presumed that the contractor will have a chief engineer on site who is responsible for the
delivery of the contract. This person is responsible for the delivery of the line according to all
engineering, legal, financial and environmental specifications.

8.1.4INDEPENDENT MONITORING TEAM
An independent monitoring team may be appointed by the lenders to ensure ongoing
compliance.

Independent – Environmental, Health, Safety & Community Officer (I –EHSC) 23

Implementation of the EMP

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

A party which is independent of the client and the contractor will be on site to audit all
activities. This individual will have the mandate to report directly to the K-CM but will liaise
on a day to day basis with the K-EHSC.

Independent – Audit team
An independent and internationally reputable audit team will review all EHSC activities
associated with the construction activities on a 6-monthly basis.

8.1.5REPORTING GUIDELINES

The reporting structure and in particular work stoppage guidelines will be determined in the
final design phase. The following principles will, however, need to be adhered to:

i. The K-CM is the most senior staff member on site.
ii. The K-CM can call a permanent stop to any activity that he deems to be having an

adverse impact on the environment.
iii. The K-EHSC can call a temporary stop to any activity that he deems to be having an

adverse impact on the environment.
iv. The I-EHSC can call a temporary stop to any activity that he deems to be having an

adverse impact on the environment.
v. The C-ESOs can call a temporary stop to any activity that they deem to be having an

adverse impact on the environment.
vi. The C-ESOs shall report to the K-EHSC on a daily basis.

A conflict resolution committee will need to be established in the final design period to ensure
the effective and pragmatic solution to any environmental specification disputes.

8.1.6SPECIFIC ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

KENMARE – ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY & COMMUNITY MANAGER
(K-EHSC)
The role of the K-EHSC is to:

1. Ensure the implementation of the EMP and associated activities by:
i. ensuring necessary environmental authorisations and permits have been obtained;
ii. monitoring and verifying that the EMP is adhered to at all times and taking action if
the specifications are not followed;

iii. monitoring and verifying that environmental impacts are kept to a minimum;
iv. assisting the contractor in finding environmentally responsible solutions to

problems;
v. keeping records of all activities/incidents on site;
vi. inspecting the site and surrounding areas regularly with regard to compliance with

the EMP;
vii. Continuously reviewing the suitability and effectiveness of the activities described

in the EMP;
viii. Overseeing the execution and management of the activities described in the

Resettlement and Compensation Plan (RCP);
ix. Ensuring that all sites disturbed during all phases of the operation are effectively

rehabilitated where required;
x. Overseeing liaison activities with local stakeholders;
xi. Ongoing liaison with appropriate project personnel;
xii. Maintenance and management of the monitoring programme;
xiii. Ongoing reporting.; and
xiv. Ongoing liaison with National and Provincial Government agencies and EDM.

24 Implementation of the EMP

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

2. Ensure the successful on-site implementation and supervision of the RCP and Public
Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP). Responsibilities will include:

i. Management of the RCP and PCDP.
ii. Financial responsibility for payment of compensation and resettlement costs.
iii. Liaison with local Government agencies and regulatory authorities.
iv. Formulation of a detailed community liaison plan.
v. Provide technical and managerial support for implementation of the Resettlement

Guidelines where the Government of Mozambique is not able to make this available.
vi. On-site liaison with the contractors responsible for resettlement infrastructure

development.
vii. Holding regular meetings with the affected community as part of the PCDP, and

attend Resettlement Working Group (RWG) meetings.
viii. Managing and responding to grievances raised by the community.

ix. Executing specific communication procedures for the different stakeholders.
x. Managing the Labour Desk (LD).
xi. Establish and maintain a socio-economic monitoring programme for the affected

households.
xii. Ongoing reporting.

INDEPENDENT – ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY & COMMUNITY
MANAGER (I-EHSC)
The independent environmental, health & safety and community officer’s primary role is to
independently oversee the entire construction programme. The I-EHSC specific roles are to:

i. Independently review all the components of the construction process to ensure
compliance with the construction EMP.

ii. Independently review the implementation of the Resettlement and Compensation
Plan.

iii. Provide feedback to the 6-monthly environmental audit team.
iv. Provide constructive input into environmental management of the area.

CONTRACTOR – ENVIRONMENTAL SITE OFFICER (C-ESO)
The C-ESO will be responsible for ensuring compliance of the EMP on a day to day basis.
The C-ESO’s duties in this regard will include the following:
i. monitoring and verifying that the EMP is adhered to at all times and taking action

if the specifications are not followed;
ii. monitoring and verifying that environmental impacts are kept to a minimum;
iii. giving a report back on the environmental issues at site meetings and other

meetings that may be called regarding environmental matters;
iv. keeping records of all activities/incidents on site in the site diary concerning the

environment;
v. inspecting the site and surrounding areas regularly with regard to compliance with

the EMP;
vi. keeping a register of complaints at the site offices and recording and dealing with

any community comments or issues;
vii. ensuring that all new personnel coming onto site attend the environmental

awareness training;
viii. ensuring that activities on site comply with other relevant environmental

legislation;
ix. completing start-up, weekly, monthly and site closure checklists; and
x. keeping a photographic record of progress on site from an environmental

perspective.

CONTRACTOR – CHIEF ENGINEER/PROJECT MANAGER (C-CE) 25

Implementation of the EMP

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

The responsibilities of the contractor’s Chief Engineer are to ensure that all aspects associated
with the specifications and intent of the construction EMP are adhered to by the contractor.
These responsibilities include:

i. monitoring and verifying that the EMP is adhered to at all times and taking action
if the specifications are not followed;

ii. monitoring and verifying that environmental impacts are kept to a minimum;
iii. reviewing and approving construction method statements; and
iv. ordering the removal of person(s) and/or equipment not complying with the

specifications.

8.2 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS

Environmental performance objectives and measurable indicators against which the
performance of the project can be measured and monitored will be developed for all the
phases of the project. Objectives, targets and Key Performance Indicators (KPI) will be
reviewed on a regular basis.

Examples of the type of performance objectives and targets that will be developed are:
• Environmental Protection Objective – To prevent or minimise irreversible changes
to the vegetation along the proposed route.
• Measurable Key Performance Indicators and Standards – Limit disturbance to
vegetation, and rehabilitate disturbed areas within three months of disturbance.
• Control Strategies – Prevent soil erosion and ecological disturbance during
construction.

8.3 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Continuous improvement will form a key component of the EMS for the operations at Moma.
Documents associated with the EMP will be regularly reviewed and updated, and if required,
actions will be undertaken to refine environmental management objectives, to ensure that the
levels of environmental protection outlined in the EMP are achieved.

8.4 REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION

The EMP reporting and documentation requirements will be based on the ISO 14001
requirements. Annual reports will be made available to authorities and to interested and
affected parties.

8.5 ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

A procedure for managing environmental incidents will be developed. This procedure will
follow specific Hazard and Incident Reporting Protocol. A report would need to be completed
for all incidents, and appropriate action taken where necessary to minimise any potential
impacts. MICOA will be informed of any environmental incident, in accordance with
legislative requirements.

The notification of an emergency or incident will include the following:

• The nature and location of the emergency or incident. Implementation of the EMP

26

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

• The relevant environmental authority.
• The name and telephone number of the designated contact person.
• The time of the emergency or incident.
• The suspected cause of the emergency or incident.
• The environmental harm and/or environmental nuisance caused, or suspected to be

caused, by the emergency or incident.
• The action taken to prevent the incident and mitigate any harm and/or

environmental nuisance caused by the emergency or incident.

8.6 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

An Emergency Preparedness Plan will be finalised before any activities take place. This will
be developed in accordance with industry best practice. Individual Emergency Preparedness
Plans will be required for various aspects of the operation, and the approach to reporting and
responding to emergencies will be based on the ISO 14001 requirements.

8.7 AUDITING AND REVIEW

Audits of the environmental performance of the Kenmare Power Line will be undertaken
6-monthly during the construction phase. The purpose of the audits will be to assess
compliance with the conditions of the Environmental Licence and objectives and targets
outlined in the Environmental Management Plan.

The findings of external, internal and informal environmental reviews will be recorded and
items requiring action will be identified from the recommendations made. The
implementation of these actions will be assessed in the following audit.

Implementation of the EMP 27

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

9. REFERENCE LIST

Coastal & Environmental Services (2002a). Environmental Impact Assessment for the
Kenmare Moma Titanium Minerals Project in Mozambique. Power line from
Nampula to the mine site. Volume 1: Scoping Report and Terms of Reference. Coastal
& Environmental Services, Grahamstown.

Coastal & Environmental Services (2002b). Environmental Impact Assessment for the
Kenmare Moma Titanium Minerals Project in Mozambique. Power line from Nampula
to the mine site. Volume 2: Specialist Reports. Coastal & Environmental Services,
Grahamstown.

Coastal & Environmental Services (2002c). Environmental Impact Assessment for the
Kenmare Moma Titanium Minerals Project in Mozambique. Power line from Nampula
to the mine site. Volume 3: Environmental Impact Report. Coastal & Environmental
Services, Grahamstown.

Reference List 29

CES Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Power Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan
CITES
C-CE 10. DEFINITION OF ACRONYMS
C-ESOs
EHSC Coastal & Environmental Services
EIA Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
EMP Contractor – Chief Engineer
EMS Contractor – Environmental Site Officers
ESO Environmental, Health, Safety & Community
GM Environmental Impact Assessment
GOV Environmental Management Plan
I-EHSC Environmental Management System
Environmental Site Officer
ISO General Manager
K-CM Mozambican authorities
K-EHSC Independent Environmental, Health, Safety & Community
Manager
K-TM International Organisation of Standards
KPIs Kenmare – Construction Manager
MICOA Kenmare – Environmental, Health, Safety & Community
p Manager
PCDP Kenmare – Technical Managers
RCP Key Performance Indicators
S Ministry for the Co-ordination of Environmental Affairs
V Page
Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan
Resettlement and Compensation Plan
Section
Volume

Definition of Acronyms 31

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

APPENDIX 1: W

EMP Environmental Impact
Ref. Impact
No. Impacts as a result of non- 1.1 ALL PROJ
1.1.1 Assessment compliance (e.g. increased silt
Ref. loading, pollution, erosion, etc.). • The Technical Manag
1.1.2 Increased risk of soil erosion. enforce compliance to
Post EIR
1.1.3 Loss of access to traditional water • An environmental site
V3 S7.3.1 p58 sources. the personnel on site t
V2 S2.5.2 p58 implemented during a

Post EIR • A rehabilitation progr
stabilised and rehabili

• Topsoil removed duri
use during rehabilitati

• Vegetation clearing a
erosion must be minim

• Erosion control measu
components.

• Construction material
routes or paths to any

1.1.4 Post EIR Pollution and disturbance due to • Location/s and layout
construction camps. • Management plans m

(security/safety/recrea

• Construction material
located in high lying a

1.1.5 Post EIR Changes to water resources due to • Areas where pollution

pollution from construction workshops) must be p

camps. • Environmental clean

maintained.

1.2 SERVITUD

See “all project components” above.

Appendix 1

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

WATER ISSUES Responsibility Phase
Construction
Management Statement K-TM
K-EHSC Design
JECT COMPONENTS C-CE
C-ESO Construction
ger/EHSC Manager must monitor contractors and Design and
o the EMP. K-TM construction
K-EHSC
e officer must be employed and must be responsible for C-CE Design and
to ensure that the environmental considerations are C-ESO Construction
all phases.
ramme must be developed to ensure disturbed areas are K-EHSC
itated following the construction phase. C-CE
ing construction must be separated and stored for later C-ESO
ion. K-TM
and ground disturbances in areas susceptible to water K-EHSC
mised. C-CE
ures must be developed for the various project C-ESO

ls must be stored in locations that do not block access K-TM
resources e.g. wells, rivers etc. K-EHSC
C-CE
t must consider environmental impacts. C-ESO
must be finalised

ation/hygiene/waste disposal/ po water/etc.).
ls must be stored sensitively and construction camps
areas.

n is likely (for example fuel storage areas and
placed inside temporary bunds.

up and disposal procedures must be implemented and

DE CLEARING

33

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

EMP Environmental Impact 1.3 ACCESS R
Ref. Impact
No. Increased risk of soil erosion and • All power line access
Assessment changes in flow regimes. operational phases, to
1.3.1 Ref.
• All access roads must
Post EIR kept open.

See “all project components” above. • All access roads not r
See “all project components” above. rehabilitated.

1.4 TOWER E

1.5 CONDUCT

34

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Management Statement Responsibility Phase

ROADS K-TM Design and
K-EHSC Construction
s roads must be maintained during the construction and C-CE
prevent dust and soil erosion. C-ESO

t have sufficient culverting and these culverts must be

required for operational maintenance must be

ERECTION

TORS

Appendix 1

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

APPENDIX 2: S

EMP Environmental Impact
Ref. Impact
No. Construction of the power line 2.1 ALL PROJ
2.1.1 Assessment may disrupt communities living in
Ref. the vicinity of the servitude, • A Resettlement and C
2.1.3 resulting in the loss of land and the loss of homesteads
V3 S8.1 p65 productive resources. listed herein must form
2.1.4 V2 S4.8.2 p126 Increased malnutrition.
2.1.5 • Affected parties must
V3 S8.1 p66 Loss of tree and annual crops. cultivated for subsiste
V2 S4.8.2 p127
Resettlement may result in • Alternative land must
V3 S8.1 p65 negative social, economic and • Affected communities
V2 S4.8.2 p126 environmental impacts.
the period prior to the
V3 S8.1 p67, 68 developer must provid
V2 S4.8.3 p130 their land).
• New and improved va
rehabilitation of fields
• Compensation for tre
acquisition must be d
• Certain subsistence c

• Resettlement options
• Homesteads for affec

being acquired by the
• Circumstances for cas

compensation must be
• Households to be relo

homestead assets and
• Transport must be pro

masonry, to the new s
• A Resettlement Work
• A socio-economic mo
• A credible independe

to undertake on-going

Appendix 2

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

SOCIAL ISSUES

Management Statement Responsibility Phase

JECT COMPONENTS K-EHSC Design and
construction
Compensation Plan (RCP) has been developed to address K-EHSC
s, land, productive resources, etc. Mitigatory measures Design and
m part of this plan. K-EHSC construction
t be assisted in redeveloping their mashambas (i.e. fields GOV
K-TM Design,
ence purposes). K-EHSC construction
t be made available to affected land users. GOV and
s must have access to sufficient food resources during operation
e re-establishment of productive systems (i.e. the Design and
de transitional support if required to those moved off construction

arieties of cashew trees must be used in the
s.
ees and the loss of crops in the field at the time of land
determined.
crops must be permitted within the servitude.

must be discussed with the household.
cted households must be constructed prior to these assets

developers.
sh compensation for structures must be determined and
e given where required.
ocated must be afforded the opportunity to rescue all
materials.
ovided for household assets and materials, excluding
site.
king Group (RWG) must be established.
onitoring programme must be developed and finalised.
ent agency acceptable to stakeholders must be appointed
g monitoring, evaluation and review of the RCP.

35

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

EMP Environmental Impact • A communication pro
Ref. Impact communities) must be
No. Undermining local and traditional
2.1.6 Assessment authorities. • Local authorities and
Ref. must be involved in th
2.1.7 Impacts of relocation of graves
V3 S8.1 p67 (e.g. loss of linkage with • Communities living a
2.1.8 V2 S4.8.4 p130 ancestors, loss of infrastructure whereabouts of existin
2.1.9 around which religious activities
2.1.10 V3 S8.1 p68 are conducted, etc.). • Graves must be left u
2.1.11 V2 S4.8.6 p131 adjusted should they i
2.1.12 Increased ambient noise levels in
2.1.13 V3 S8.1 p68 surrounding areas during • However, if the reloca
2.1.14 V2 S4.8.7 p131 construction. 1. Discussions must b
Reduced safety of local residents. resettlement of gra
V3 S8.1 p69 2. An appropriate and
V2 S4.8.7 p131 Visual intrusion. be implemented.
V3 S8.1 p69
V2 S4.8.8 p132 Health risks due to exposure to • Where possible const
V3 S8.1 p69 electromagnetic fields. 05h00).
V2 S4.8.9 p132
Pollution and disturbance due to • Safety procedures mu
Post EIR construction camps.
• Visual intrusion must
V3 S8.1 p67 Increased potential for conflict
V2 S4.8.4 p130 over access to land and resources. • The public consultatio
throughout the project
Post EIR Loss or disruption to traditional issues/potential dange
access and transport routes.
• Location/s and layout
• Management plans m

(security/safety/recrea
• Mashambas (agricultu

relevant local authorit
reallocated at cost to a
• The impact of constru
the necessary actions
maintained in an acce

36

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Management Statement Responsibility Phase

ocess with key stakeholders (authorities and K-EHSC Design and
e developed and finalised. construction
K-TM
representatives of other community interest groups K-EHSC Design and
he planning for land expropriation. C-CE construction
along the servitude must be consulted as to the
ng graves. K-TM Construction
underneath the power line. Positions of pylons may be K-ENSC
intersect with grave sites. C-ESO Design
ation of graves is unavoidable, then: K-EHSC Design
be held with the next-of-kin to make sure the C-C-ESO Construction
aves is treated in accordance with their wishes. K-TM and
d culturally sensitive process for relocating graves must C-CE operation
K-EHSC Design and
truction must be avoided at night (between 21h00 and C-ESO construction
Design and
ust be developed and implemented. K-TM construction
K-EHSC Construction
be taken into account during the design phase.
K-TM
on and disclosure plan (PCDP) must continue K-EHSC
t, and must inform locals of construction, safety
ers and other project activities. K-EHSC
t must consider environmental impacts. C-ESO
must be finalised
ation/hygiene/waste disposal/ potable water/etc.).
ural fields) must be realigned in consultation with the
ties and affected landowners to ensure that land is not
a third party.
uction vehicles on existing roads must be monitored and
must be undertaken to ensure that these roads are
eptable condition.

Appendix 2

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

EMP Environmental Impact • An awareness program
Ref. Impact the induction course g
No. Increased incidence of STDs and
2.1.15 Assessment AIDS. • Construction workers
Ref. STDs.
2.2.1
Post EIR • Condoms to be made
2.2.2
V3 S8.1 p65 The loss of ethnobotanical 2.2 SERVITUD
2.3.1 V2 S4.8.2 p126 resources.
2.3.2 • Wood must be made a
2.3.3 V3 S8.1 p70 Expansion of employment and • The harvesting of frui
2.3.4 V2 S4.8.10 skills base by the provision of
p133 local employment opportunities. for building material o
operations.
V3 S8.1 p65, 67 Resettlement and loss of land and • Shrubs and undergrow
V2 S4.8.11 crops. building material mus
p130 • Penalties for contracto
V3 S8.1 p70 Expansion of transport servitude is damaged.
V2 S4.8.11 infrastructure. • A labour intensive em
p133 clearing of vegetation
Post EIR Decreased air quality. implemented.

V3 S8.1 p69 Safety on roads. 2.3 ACCESS R
V2 S4.8.7 p131
• Alignment of access r
wherever practical, an
crops.

• Access roads must be
add as much value to

• Dust on access roads
vehicle speeds and/or
stabilisation agent.

• Education programme
be maintained.

Appendix 2

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Management Statement Responsibility Phase
Design and
mme focusing on the dangers of STDs must form part of K-EHSC construction
given to construction workers.
s are provided ongoing access to information regarding K-TM Design and
K-EHSC construction
available to construction. C-ESO
Design
DE CLEARING K-CM
K-EHSC Design
available to those who have lost access to their resource. Design
it crops, medicinal plants, and trees and shrubs suitable K-TM Construction
or fuel, must be allowed prior to the bush removal K-EHSC Construction
C-CE
wth that are felled but are not suitable for fuel or GOV
st be chipped or left to enhance nutrient cycling. K-CM
ors must be implemented if vegetation outside of the K-TM
. K-EHSC
mployment plan regarding local labour (e.g. for the C-ESO
n and house-building work) must be finalised and K-EHSC
C-ESO
ROADS

roads must be finalised, and must avoid homesteads
nd must not cause undue relocation or destruction of

e planned with the relevant authorities to ensure that they
regional and sub-regional infrastructure as possible.

near inhabited areas must be suppressed by reducing
by the application of water or a biodegradable soil

es on road safety must be provided. Speed limits must

37

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

EMP Environmental Impact 2.4 TOWER E
Ref. Impact
No. Loss of land and productive • Rehabilitation of towe
Assessment resources • Soil must be replaced
2.4.1 Ref.
must be replaced on to
V3 S8.1 p65
V2 S4.8.2 p126 2.5 CONDUCT

See “all project components” above.

38

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Management Statement Responsibility Phase

ERECTION K-TM Construction
C-ESO
er areas.
d in the same order in which it was removed, i.e. topsoil

op.

TORS

Appendix 2

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

APPENDIX 3: WA

EMP Environmental Impact 3.1 ALL PROJ
Ref. Impact
No. Impacts as a result of non- • The Technical Mana
3.1.1 Assessment compliance (e.g. increased enforce compliance
Ref. pollution, changes to water
3.1.2 chemical properties, etc.). • An environmental si
Post EIR for the personnel on
3.1.3 Pollution and disturbance due to implemented during
Post EIR construction activities.
3.1.4 • Management plans
Post EIR Pollution during construction. recreation, hygiene

Post EIR Pollution and disturbance due to • A managed waste d
construction camps. construction camps

See “all project components” above. • Management plans
See “all project components” above. recreation, hygiene
See “all project components” above.
See “all project components” above. 3.2 SERVITUD

3.3 ACCESS R

3.4 TOWER E

3.5 CONDUCT

Appendix 3

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

ASTE DISPOSAL

Management Statement Responsibility Phase
Construction
JECT COMPONENTS K-TM
K-EHSC Design
ager/EHSC Manager must monitor contractors and Construction
to the EMP. K-TM Design
ite officer must be employed and must be responsible K-EHSC
n site to ensure that the environmental considerations are C-ESO
g all phases. K-TM
must be finalised (waste disposal, security, safety, K-EHSC
e, potable water, etc.). C-ESO
K-TM
disposal system must be provided at all work sites and K-EHSC
s. C-ESO

must be finalised (waste disposal, security, safety,
e, potable water, etc.).

DE CLEARING

ROADS

ERECTION

TORS

39

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

APPENDIX 4: DUST AND A

EMP Environmental Impact • 4.1 ALL PROJ
Ref. Impact •
No. Impacts as a result of non- The Technical Man
Assessment compliance (e.g. increased dust • enforce compliance
4.1.1 Ref. and noise emissions.). An environmental s
for the personnel on
Post EIR implemented during

See “all projects components” above. 4.2 SERVITUD

4.3.1 V3 S7.3.1 p58 Increased risk of soil erosion. 4.3 ACCESS R
V2 S2.5.2 p58
All power line acce
operational phases,

4.3.2 Post EIR Decreased air quality. • Dust control measu
and excavation acti
See “all projects components” above.
See “all projects components” above. 4.4 TOWER E

4.5 CONDUCT

Appendix 4

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS

Management Statement Responsibility Phase

JECT COMPONENTS K-TM Construction
K-EHSC
nager/EHSC Manager must monitor contractors and C-ESO Design,
e to the EMP. construction
site officer must be employed and must be responsible K-TM and
n site to ensure that the environmental considerations are K-EHSC operation
g all phases. C-ESO Construction

DE CLEARING K-TM
K-EHSC
ROADS C-ESO

ess roads must be maintained during the construction and
, to prevent dust and soil erosion.

ures must be developed and implemented for all roads
ivities, which must include watering programmes.

ERECTION

TORS

41

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

APPENDIX 5: ECO

EMP Environmental Impact 5.1 ALL PROJ
Ref. Impact
No. The loss of natural plant • Clearing of vegetat
5.1.1 Assessment communities and other land use trees within close p
5.1.2 Ref. types.
5.1.3 Introduction or spread of alien • Excessive vegetatio
V3 S7.3.1 p55 species. • The spread of alien
5.1.4 V2 S2.5.2 p54
Impacts as a result of non- • The Technical Man
5.1.5 V3 S7.3.1 p57 compliance. enforce compliance
V2 S2.5.2 p57
• An environmental
Post EIR for the personnel on
implemented during
V3 S7.3.1 p58 Increased risk of soil erosion.
V2 S2.5.2 p58 • A rehabilitation prog
stabilised and rehab
V3 S7.3.1 p58 Pollution and disturbance due to
V2 S2.5.7 p57 construction camps. • Topsoil removed dur
use during rehabilit

• Vegetation clearing
erosion must be min

• Erosion control mea
components.

• Culverts must be ins
maintained.

• Construction camps a
environments e.g. w

• No fires must be allow
• Firewood must not be
• Management plans m

(security/safety/rec

Appendix 5

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

OLOGICAL ISSUES

Management Statement Responsibility Phase
Construction
JECT COMPONENTS K-EHSC Construction
C-ESO Construction
tion must be restricted to the servitude and the cutting of K-TM
proximity to the power line. K-EHSC Design and
C-ESO construction
on clearing must be avoided. K-TM
n species must be monitored and controlled. K-EHSC Design

nager/EHSC Manager must monitor contractors and K-TM
e to the EMP. K-EHSC
C-ESO
site officer must be employed and must be responsible
n site to ensure that the environmental considerations are K-TM
g all phases. K-EHSC
gramme must be developed to ensure disturbed areas are C-ESO
bilitated during the construction phase.
ring construction must be separated and stored for later
tation.
and ground disturbances in areas susceptible to water
nimised.
asures must be developed for various project

stalled under access roads, where necessary, and must be

and drum stations must not be located in sensitive
wetlands and forests.
wed in and around natural vegetation.
e collected from the surrounding vegetation.
must be finalised
creation/hygiene/waste disposal/ potable water/etc.).

43

Coastal & Environmental Services. Moma Pow

EMP Environmental Impact
Ref. Impact
No.
Assessment
Ref.

5.2 SERVITUD

5.2.1 V3 S7.3.1 p56 The loss of ethnobotanical • Local people must b

V2 S2.5.2 p56 resources. servitude prior to co

• Vegetation outside

5.2.2 V3 S7.3.2 p58 Loss of habitat. • The route presented

V2 S3.4.3 p84 avoids the most sen

5.3 ACCESS R

5.3.1 V3 S7.3.1 p55 The loss of natural plant • Travel along the ro

V3 S7.3.2 p58 communities and other land use access roads.

V2 S2.5.2 p58 types. • Access roads must b

V2 S3.4.3 p84 of impact on the mo

Forest and Miombo

5.3.2 V3 S7.3.1 p58 Increased risk of soil erosion. • Water diversion berm
V2 S2.5.2 p58 • All power line acce

operational phases,

5.3.3 V3 S7.3.1 p57 New access routes • If possible, sensitiv
V2 S2.5.2 p57 • Topsoil will be repl

5.4 TOWER E

5.4.1 V3 S7.3.1 p58 • Loss of natural plant • If possible, sensitiv

V2 S2.5.2 p54 communities and habitats. • Topsoil will be repl

V2 S3.4.3 p84 • Fragmentation of habitats

5.5 CONDUCT

5.5.1 V3 S7.3.2 p61 Increased mortality of migratory • Appropriate bird fli

V2 S3.4.3 p87 species. visibility of the pow

Larde floodplains a

• Exact locations mus

consultant.

44

wer Line EIA: Environmental Management Plan

Management Statement Responsibility Phase
Construction
DE CLEARING K-EHSC Design
C-ESO Construction
be allowed to remove usable vegetation from the K-TM and
onstruction. C-CE operation
the servitude must not be damaged. K-TM Design
d in the EIA must be followed, where possible, as it K-EHSC
nsitive habitats. C-ESO Design

ROADS K-TM
C-ESO
ute must be restricted to the defined servitude and
K-TM
be carefully selected and sited to have the least amount K-EHSC
ore sensitive vegetation types i.e. Coastal Evergreen C-CE
o Woodland.
ms must be installed along access roads.
ess roads must be maintained during the construction and
, to prevent dust and soil erosion.
ve habitats will be avoided
laced.

ERECTION

ve habitats will be avoided.
laced.

TORS

ight diverters (BFD) must be installed to increase the
wer lines in the coastal plain around the Moma and Rio
and Lagoa Maganha du Machana.
st be determined in consultation with an environmental

Appendix 5


Click to View FlipBook Version