Predictive Power of Systolic BP on Cardiovascular Mortality
Systolic BP (mmHg) Diastolic BP (mmHg)
<140 1 1.5 2 2.5 <90
140–159 Relative risk 90–99
≥100
160–179
≥180
0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Relative risk
Prognosis Prognosis Prognosis Prognosis
better worse better worse
Alli et al. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1205–12
Key Messages
For persons over age 50, SBP is a more important than DBP as CVD risk factor.
Hypertension Diagnosis in Different Measurement
Methods
Category SBP and/or DBP
Office BP measurement (mmHg) (mmHg)
≥ 140 ≥ 90
HBPM ≥ 135 and/or ≥ 85
ABPM
Average of daytime BP ≥ 135 and/or ≥ 85
Average of nighttime BP ≥ 120 and/or ≥ 70
Average of BP in a day ≥ 130 and/or ≥ 80
SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HBPM = home blood pressure
monitoring, ABPM = ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Only relying on manual office blood pressures misses out on white coat and
masked hypertension
200
Ambulatory BP mmHg 180 Masked hypertension
160 Hypertension
140 Normotension White Coat 135
120 Hypertension 200
100 120 140 160 180
100
Manual Office BP mmHg
From Pickering, Hypertension 1992
The prognosis of masked hypertension
Prevalence is approximately 10% in hypertensive patients.
CV events per 1000 patient-year 35
CV Events
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 White coat Uncontrolled Masked
24/656 41/462 236/3125
Normal
23/685
Bobrie et al. JAMA 2004;291:1342-9
Salt Intake and 3 types of Masked Hypertension
Kario K. Circulation 2018;137:543-545.
10-year follow up data from Ohasama Study
The Risk of Masked Hypertension
CVD Mortality Stroke CVD Mortality/Stroke
Relative Hazard (95% CI) 2.83
2.17
(0.73-3.21)
(0.95-3.72)1.00 1.07
(1.04-3.61)
(0.58-
2.07)
(1.31-3.60)
(1.77-4.54)
(0.76-2.14)
(1.38-3.29)
(1.49-3.41)
3 2.13 2.26
2 1.88 1.94
1.28
1.54 1.00
1.00
1
Events/ 21/739 11/170 14/221 21/202 36/739 12/170 26/221 38/202 49/739 21/170 36/221 46/202
Patients N-BP WC-HT M-HT S-HT N-BP WC-HT M-HT S-HT N-BP WC-HT M-HT S-HT
J am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:508-515.
เปรียบเทยี บผลความแตกต่างของความดันโลหติ วัดทีบ่ ้านและทคี่ ลินิกจากการศึกษา 18 รายงาน แกน
นอนแสดงระดับของความดันโลหติ systolic ทวี่ ัดจากคลินิก
แสดง white-coat effect ทเี่ กิดขึน้ ตอนแพทยเ์ ข้าเยยี่ มผ้ปู ่ วย
ค่าความดัน mean arterial pressure ค่า heart rate
Grassi G, et al. Circulation 1999;100:222.
PAMELA study
Pressioni Arteriorse Monitorate E Loro Associazioni
Kaplan-Meier curves แสดงการรอดชวี ติ เปรียบเทยี บกลุ่มผู้ป่ วยทมี่ ีความดนั โลหติ ปกต,ิ white-coat hyper-
tension และ sustained hypertension
วนิ ิจฉัยจาก clinic BP เทียบกับ 24 hour BP วินิจฉัยจาก clinic BP เทียบกับ home BP
Hypertension 2006;47:846.
Untreated WCH and CV Events
Study, Year Total HR (95% CI)
participants, n
Verdecchia et al, 1994 1392 1.17 (0.25-5.33)
Fagard et al, 2005 352 1.00 (0.35-2.90)
Pierdomenico et al, 2008 0.97 (0.38-2.46)
Mancia et al, 2013 2037 1.45 (0.28-7.51)
Sung et al, 2013 1589 5.59 (1.22-25.55)
Asayama et al, 2014 1257 1.20 (0.93-.54)
Stergiou et al, 2014 8237 1.42 (1.06-1.91)
Banegas et al, 2018 6458 1.96 (1.22-3.15)
63,910 1.36 (1.03-2.00)
Overall (I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.379)
0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0
Ann Intern Med. DOI: 10.7326/M19-0223.
Ten-year age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of new-onset SHT in
WCHT and MHT vs true normotension (NT) at entry
Mancia G et al. Hypertension 2009;54:226-232
Hypertension Diagnostic Algorithm
Average office BP (on the same visit)
≥ 130/80 ≥ 140/90 ≥ 160/100 ≥ 180/110
Definite HT
High normal BP Possible HT Probable HT Yes
No TOD / CVD / DM / high CV risk* No
No
HBPM/ABPM HBPM/ABPM or
HBPM/ABPM or Serial OBPM
Serial OBPM 2 visits within 1 mo.
2 visits within 3 mo.
High: Masked HT High: Definite HT
Normal: Normotension Normal (HBPM/ABPM): White-coat HT
*10-year Thai CV risk score > 10 %
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) : การวัดความดันโลหติ ดว้ ยเครอ่ื งชนิดพกพาทบ่ี ้าน
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) : การวัดความดนั โลหติ ดว้ ยเครอ่ื งชนิดตดิ ตัวพร้อมวัดอัตโนมัติ
Office Blood Pressure Monitoring (OBPM) : การวัดความดันโลหติ ในสถานพยาบาล
High BP: HBPM/daytime ABPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg or serial OBPM ≥ 140/90 mmHg
Recommendations for Additional Investigations on Patients
with Hypertension
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
Heart I B
I B
12-lead electrocardiogram in every IIb B
patient.
Echocardiogram
− For patients whose
electrocardiogram is abnormal or in
cases with suspected heart disease
− For patients who are suspected of
having left ventricular hypertrophy
Recommendations for Additional Investigations on
Patients with Hypertension
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
Arteries IIb B
− Carotid artery ultrasound is IIb B
recommended for patients whose IIb B
carotid bruit can be heard, those
with cerebrovascular disease or
patients with artery diseases in
other parts of the body
− Pulse wave velocity (PWV)
− Ankle brachial index (ABI)
Recommendations for Additional Investigations on
Patients with Hypertension
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
Kidneys I B
I B
− Creatinine and estimated glomerular I A
filtration rate (eGFR)
IIa C
− Measurement of urine albumin
− Microalbumin level in urine for patients
with DM
− Kidney ultrasound and Doppler in patients
with kidney disease, with albumin in urine
or suspected of HT from renal artery
stenosis
Recommendations for Additional Investigations on
Patients with Hypertension
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
Eyes I C
− Retina examination in patients with very IIa B
high BP (SBP ≥ 180 mmHg or DBP ≥ 110
mmHg) or those with comorbid DM
Brain
− CT scan or MRI of the brain for patients
with neurological symptoms or cognitive
disorders
Recommendations for HBPM
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
Measurement Methods I B
A. Measure BP in a seated position, with both
feet placed on the ground and start
measuring after at least 2-minute sit-down
B. Measure BP two episodes per day, in the
morning and in the evening. Measure BP
twice in each episode, each time 1 minute
apart.
#For Diagnosis The measurement should
be done for 7 consecutive days or at least 3
days per week
Recommendations for HBPM
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
C. For the morning episode, one should I B
measure BP within 1 hour after waking up
and having urinated. This is preferably done
before having breakfast and before taking
antihypertensives (if any).
D. For the night episode, one should measure
BP before bedtime
Recommendations for HBPM
Recommendations Strength of Quality of
Recommendations Evidence
Since HBPM can predict CVD I B
complications better than office BP
measurement, the readings from HBPM
are to be prioritized if they conflict with
readings from office BP. Additional
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
(ABPM) can be considered when
necessary
Clinical use of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring
Measurement Before each visit to the health professional:
protocol • 3 – 7-day monitoring in the morning (before drug intake if
Interpretation treated) and the evening.
• Two measurements on each occasion after 5 min sittng rest and 1
min between measurements.
Long-term follow-up of treated hypertension:
• 1 – 2 measurements per week or month.
• Average home blood pressure after excluding readings of the first
day ≥ 135 or 85 mmHg indicates hypertension.
J Hypertens 2020;38:982–1004
Patterns of Disrupted Diurnal BP
Variation identified by ABPM
Nocturnal Increased absolute level of night-time blood pressure
hypertension : Associated with increased cardiovascular risk - may
indicate obstructive sleep apnea
Morning surge :
Excessive blood pressure elevation rising in morning
Definitions, thresholds ,and prognostic impact debatable
*The classic definition of nondipping (nocturnal blood pressure fall <10% or night/day ratio >0.9)
may be criticized because ‘reduced dipping’ is in effect a form of ‘nondipping’.
J Hypertens 2013;31:1731-68.
Patterns of Disrupted Diurnal BP
Variation identified by ABPM
Dipping : Nocturnal blood pressure fall >10% of daytime values or
Night/day blood pressure ratio <0.9 and >0.8 – normal
diurnal blood pressure pattern
Reduced dipping : Nocturnal blood pressure fall from 1 to 10% of daytime
values or
Night/day blood pressure ratio <1 and>0.9 – reduced
diurnal blood pressure pattern
Non dipping and No reduction or increase in nocturnal blood pressure or
rising :
Night/day ratio ≥1 – associated with poor cardiovascular
risk
Extreme dipping : Marked nocturnal blood pressure fall >20% of daytime
values or
Night/day ratio <0.8 – debatable cardiovascular risk
*The classic definition of nondipping (nocturnal blood pressure fall <10% or night/day ratio >0.9)
may be criticized because ‘reduced dipping’ is in effect a form of ‘nondipping’.
J Hypertens 2013;31:1731-68.
No. of risk factors in patients withMost Patients With Hypertension Have Additional Risk Factors
hypertension
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Patients (%)
Mancia et al. J Hypertens 2004;22:51−7
THAI CV RISK SCORE
Without Laboratory Test
Thai CV Risk Score Waist circumference 20-60 inches
Age 35-70 Height 130-200
Sex M/F centimeters
Smoking Y/N
DM Y/N With Laboratory Test
SBP 80-200
Total Cholesterol 150-280
LDL Cholesterol 40-220
HDL Cholesterol 30-70
Thai CV Risk Score
Age (35-70 years) + -
Sex Female Male
Smoking Yes
Diabetes No Yes
Systolic BP (80-200 mmHg) No
- +
Non-Laboratory Test - +
- +
Waist Circumference (20-60 inches)
Height (130-200 cms)
Laboratory Test - +
- +
Total Cholesterol (150-280 mg/dl) - +
LDL-Cholesterol (40-220 mg/dl)
HDL-Cholesterol (30-70 mg/dl)
Thai CV Risk Score
Interpretation and Suggestion
Predicted 10-year Risks Interpretation Action
<10 percent Low Risk General Advise
General Advise
10 – <20 percent Medium Risk See Physician
20 – 30 percent High Risk
2o 1o Prevention 1. Thai CV Risk Score Risk of CVD in 10 years
<10% = Low risk
10-19% = Moderate risk
>20% = High risk
2. Sub Clinical ASCVD (Moderate to High Risk)
Atherosclerotic plaque
High Coronary Calcium Score (>300 Agatston units)
Ankle-brachial index < 0.9
3. Clinical ASCVD (High Risk)
Comparison Between EGAT Risk Scores (with and without blood test)
and the Framingham CVD Score in Predicting 17-year CVD events in
EGAT 1
17-year CV Risk (%) 25 Actual event
20 EGAT score with blood test
15 EGAT score without blood test
10 Framingham CVD risk score
5
0 Second Third Fourth Fifth
First
Quintile of predicted risk based on original Framingham heart score
Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:359-365.
THAI CV RISK SCORE
Moderate-to-High Risk Detection Performance
Thai CV Without Lipid vs Thai CV With Lipid (n=2820)
Thai CV Risk Score
Without Lipid Low Risk <10% Low Risk <10% Moderate to High Risk
Profile (n=2,457) (n=2,775) ≥10% (n=45)
0
2,457
45
Moderate to High Risk ≥10% 318
(n=363)
Agreement 88.72%, p<0.001
Moderate to High Risk= 363 Moderate to High Risk= 45
318 45
Office BP treatment targets Class Level
I A
General Recommendations I A
• The first objective of treatment should be to IIa B
lower BP to <140/90 mmHg in all patients
• Provided that treatment is well tolerated treated
BP should be targeted to 130/80 mmHg or lower
in most patients
• A DBP target of <80 mmHg should be considered
for all hypertensive patients, independent of the
level and risk of comorbidities
Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 / Eur Heart J 2008, in press
BP Reductions of
Nonpharmacological Interventions
Intervention Dose Reduction in SBP
(mmHg)
Weight loss Aim for at least 1-kg reduction in body weight for most adults who are overweight.
HT Normal BP
Expect ~1 mmHg reduction for every 1-kg reduction in body weight. 5 2–3
DASH dietary pattern Diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, with reduced content of 11 3
saturated and total fat. 5–6 2–3
4–5 2
Dietary sodium Optimal goal <1500 m g/day. Aim for at least 1000 mg/day reduction in most adults
5–8 2–4
Dietary potassium Approximately 3500–5000 mg/day. 42
Physical Activity 54
Aerobic 90–150 m in/week at 65–75% of max heart rate 43
Dynamic resistance 90–150 min/week; 6 exercises, 3 sets/exercise, 10 repetitions/set
Isometric resistance 4 × 2 min (hand grip), 1 m in rest between exercises; 3 sessions/week for 8–10 week duration
Alcohol consumption In individuals who drink alcohol, reduce to: Men ≤ 2 drinks daily, Women ≤ 1 drink daily (~12 oz.
beer, 5 oz. of wine, or 1.5 oz. distilled spirits)
คาํ แนะนําการปรับวถิ กี ารดาํ เนินชีวติ
วธิ ีการที่แนะนํา รายละเอียด
การจาํ กดั เกลือในอาหาร ลดการเติมเกลือขณะเตรียมอาหารและขณะรับประทาน
Healthy diet เพิม่ อาหารธญั พืช, ผลไม,้ ผกั , ผลิตภณั ฑน์ มไขมนั ต่าํ
ผกั ใบเขียว และ beetroot จะมี nitrates สูง, avocados, nuts, seeds, legumes และเตา้ หูจ้ ะมี แมกนีเซียม, แคลเซียมและโพแทสเซียมสูง
Healthy drinks ลดการรับประทานไขมนั อ่ิมตวั , น้าํ ตาล
Moderate alcohol consumption ลด trans fat
การลดน้าํ หนกั กาแฟ ชา ชาเขียว น้าํ ทบั ทิม น้าํ beetroot และโกโก้
การงดสูบบุหรี่ ผชู้ ายไมเ่ กิน 2 standard drinks ผหู้ ญิงไม่เกิน 1.5 standard drink (1 standard drink มี alcohol 10 กรัม)
การออกกาํ ลงั ควรดูแล abdominal obesity เป็นพิเศษ waist-to-height ratio ควรจะนอ้ ยกวา่ 0.5
ลดความเครียด เพื่อลดความเสี่ยงตอ่ CVD, COPD และมะเร็ง
สมุนไพรนานาชนิด ออกกาํ ลงั ไดท้ ้งั aerobic หรือ resistance exercise
หลีกเลี่ยง air pollution และ อุณหภูมิท่ีเยน็ มาก อาจมีผลช่วยลดความดนั โลหิตได้
ไมแ่ นะนาํ
มีหลกั ฐานชดั เจนเกี่ยวกบั air pollution ท่ีอาจเพิม่ ความดนั โลหิตในระยะยาว
Recommendations for adequate daily sodium intake
Age Adequate Upper Limit 2,300 mg sodium (Na)
Intake (mg) = 100 mmol sodium (Na)
19-50 (mg) = 5.8 g of salt (NaCl)
51-70 1500 2300 = 1 level teaspoon of
71 and over 2300 table salt
1300 2300
1200
• 80% of average sodium intake is in processed foods
• Only 10% is added at the table or in cooking
Institute of Medicine, 2003
เคร่ืองปรุงรส ปริมาณโซเดยี ม
ต่อ 1 ช้อนโต๊ะ
นํ้าปลา
ซีอิ้ว 1345 มิลลิกรมั
ซอสถวั่ เหลือง
ซอสหอยนางรม 1225 มิลลิกรมั
นํ้าจิ้มไก่ 1225 มิลลิกรมั
ซอสพริก 530 มิลลิกรมั
ซอสมะเขือเทศ 385 มิลลิกรมั
ผงชรู ส 205 มิลลิกรมั
ซปุ ก้อน 140 มิลลิกรมั
เกลือ ( 1 ช้อนชา ) 163 มิลลิกรมั
176 มิลลิกรมั
2400 มิลลิกรมั
Sodium Content in Street Foods
โครงการโซเดียมและโซเดียมคลอไรดใ์ นอาหาร Street Foods โดย ดร.เนตรนภิส วฒั นสุชาติ https://www.facebook.com/diabeteshealthcareTH/photos/a.1670987076257225/2177684042254190/?type=3&theater
Factors that could predict high salt intake
Factors Multivariate analysis
Adjusted OR 95% CI p-value
Graduated from university of higher 2.42 1.37-4.26 <0.01*
Estimated CCr (> 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) 4.00 2.11-7.58 <0.01*
Knew that salt could increase BP level 2.88 1.39-5.96 <0.01*
OR= odd ratio, 95% CI = 95% confidence interval CCR – Creatinine clearance, BP = blood pressure
* p-value considered significant at < 0.05
Buranakitjaroen P, J Med Assoc Thai 2013;96(suppl. 2):S1-S8.
ยาหรือสารทเี่ พม่ิ ระดบั ความดนั โลหิต
ชื่อยาหรือสารทเี่ พมิ่ ความดนั โลหิต รายละเอยี ด
NSAIDs celecoxib เพิ่มความดนั โลหิตได้ ≤3/1 มม.ปรอท
NSAIDs อื่นเพ่ิม 3/1 มม.ปรอท
aspirin ไม่เพิ่มความดนั โลหิต
NSAIDs มีผลตา้ นฤทธ์ิ RAAS inhibitors และตา้ นฤทธ์ิ beta blockers
ยาคุมกาํ เนิด ยาขนาดสูง (>50 µg estrogen และ 1-4 µg progestin) เพิ่มความดนั โลหิตได้ 6/3 มม.ปรอท
Antidepressants SNRI เพมิ่ 2/1 มม.ปรอท
SSRI ไม่เพิ่มความดนั โลหิต
Tricyclic Antidepressant เพิ่มความดนั โลหิต
Acetaminophen ถ้าใช้ทุกวนั เป็นประจาํ เพิ่มความเสี่ยงต่อการเป็นความดนั โลหิตสูง 1.34 เท่า
ยาอ่ืน ๆ steroids, antiretroviral therapy, sympathomimetics (pseudoephedrine, cocaine, amphetamines), ยารักษาไม
เกรน, serotonergics, recombinant human erythropoietin, calcineurin inhibitors, antiangiogenesis และ kinase
inhibitors
สมุนไพรและสารอ่ืน ๆ แอลกอฮอล,์ Ma-huang, โสม, ชะเอม, St. John’s Wort, Yohimbine
RAAS : renin angiotensin aldosterone system
SNRI : selective norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors SSRI : selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
JACC 2020;75:320-32
JACC 2020;75:320-32
JACC 2020;75:320-32
2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines
Classification of HT stages according to BP levels, presence of CV
risk factors, HMOD, or comorbidities
Hypertension Other risk BP (mmHg) grading
factors
disease High-normal Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3
staging
SBP 130-139 SBP 140-149 SBP 160-179 SBP ≥ 180
DBP 85-89 DBP 90-99 DBP 100-109 DBP ≥ 110
Stage 1 No other risk factors Low risk Low risk Moderate risk High risk
(uncomplicated) High risk
1 or 2 risk factors Low risk Moderate risk Moderate-
Stage 2 high risk High risk
(asymptomatic
≥ 3 risk factors Low-moderate Moderate- High risk High-very
disease) risk high risk high risk
HMOD, CKD grade 3, Moderate- High risk High risk
high risk
or diabetes mellitus
without organ
damage
Stage 3 Symptomatic CVD, Very high risk Very high risk Very high risk Very high risk
(symptomatic CKD grade ≥ 4, or
disease)
diabetes mellitus
with organ damage
HMOD = Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage
Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2008, in press
Initiation of BP-lowering treatment
(lifestyle changes and medication) at different initial office BP levels
High normal BP Grade 1 hypertension Grade 2 hypertension Grade 3 hypertension
BP 130-139/85-89 BP 140-159/90-99 BP 160-179/100-109 BP ≥ 180/110
Lifestyle advice Lifestyle advice Lifestyle advice Lifestyle advice
Consider drug Immediate drug Immediate drug Immediate drug
treatment in very treatment in high or treatment in all
treatment in all
high risk very high risk patients (I,A)
patients (I,A)
patients with patients with CVD,
CVD, especially renal disease or TOD
CAD ( IIb,A) (I,A)
Drug treatment in Aim for BP control Aim for BP control
moderate risk within 3 months within 3 months
patients without
CVD, renal disease or
HMOD after 3-6
months of lifestyle
intervention if BP not
controlled(I,A)
Office BP Thresholds for Drug Treatment
Age group Office SBP treatment threshold (mmHg) Office DBP
treatment
threshold
(mmHg)
HT + Diabetes + CKD + CAD + Stroke/TIA
18 - 65 years >140 >140 >140 >140a >140a >90
>140 >140 >140 >140a >140a >90
65 - 79 years >160 >160 >160 >160 >160 >90
>90 >90 >90 >90 >90
>80 years
Office DBP
treatment
threshold
(mmHg)
BP = blood pressure; CAD = coronary artery disease; CKD = chronic kidney disease; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; SBP =
systolic blood pressure; TIA = transient ischaemic attack.
aTreatment may be considered in these very high-risk patients with high–normal SBP (i.e. SBP 130–140 mmHg).