A U D I T HI R A R C BORANG HIRARC SELEPAS PEMURNIAN
Legal : Title of Activity : Exp 1- Soil sampling (CEV444) Function / Department : Instrument and Enviromental Analysis ACT 514, FMA 1967/ OSHA 1994 Job performed by : STUDENT Section : Mamal Analisis & Instrumentasi S RPN = L x S RC (Contaminated soil) Biochemical Hazard Skin disease, Skin irritation, cut, 1 2 I (use of Hand Auger) Ergonomoic hazard hand abrasions, shoulder paint 2 2 4 I (Heat exposure) Physical Hazard Burns to skin 2 4 I Electrical hazard Electric shock 1 2 I (Mineral dust) Physical Hazard respiratory problem, eye irritation 1 2 I (Flying object) Physical Hazard Injury 2 4 I (Mineral dust) Physical Hazard respiratory problem, eye irritation 1 2 I Electrical hazard Electric shock 1 2 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health 1 First Aid only Slightly effected 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) Discussion at the management level 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) Becomes an issue to the clients 4 Permanent disability Becomes an issue among the public Universities 5 Fatal Risk Category ( RC ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 I Tolerable Should be implemented and recorded. measures risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control the and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if acceptable A risk identified as LOW may be considered as The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Might be occur at sometimes in future Lab Manual, Glove, Safety boots 2 Warning signage, Lab Manual, Glove 2 Warning signage, Lab Manual, Instuments SOP, Glove, 2 2 Satisfactory Satisfactory Lab Manual, SOP Equipment, Glove, Safety boots HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Nur Fadzilah Abu Kassim Prepared by / Date : Khaironniswah Abdul Samad/ 1 Dec 2020 Checked by / Date : Ir. Mohd Azahar Mohd Ariff/ 1 Dec 2020 RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation HAZARD IDENTIFICATION No. Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L 5 - 12 II Significant assessment Form including date for completion. required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to III Intolerable Including date for completion. taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Has not been known to occur after many years UiTM Reputation Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Lab Manual, Mask, Goggle Lab Manual, Glove, Goggle Lab Manual, Mask, Goggle Lab Manual, Instuments SOP, Glove, 5S Description Is practically impossible and has never occurred 15 - 25 Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory 2 2 2 Approved by / Date : Dr. Norhaslinda Nasuha/ 1 Dec 2020 RISK CONTROL Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Type of Activity R = Routine Severity ( S ) Estimate loss (RM) < 100 < 10 < 1000 > 10,000 < 10,000 NR = Non Routine Sub-Activity 2 Heat in oven 100 oC for 12 hours R Mash the soil using mortar & pastle R sieve shaker Sieve the soil to get soil sample <150ul using R 4 3 1 R Collect soil sample by using Hand Auger
Legal : Title of Activity : Heating the solid samples (soil) by using the oven (CEV 434) Function / Department : Faculty of Chemical Engineering FMA 1967/ OSHA 1994 Job performed by : Student Section : Makmal Kimia 2 S RPN = L x S RC 1 R Electrical hazard Electric shock 1 2 I 2 R Physical hazard (use glass bottle) Injury (crack bottle) 2 4 I 3 R Spillage Skin disease 2 4 I 4 R (heat exposure) Physical hazard Skin burn 2 4 I 5 oven Taking the sample from the R (heat exposure) Physical hazard Skin burn 2 4 I 9 8 7 6 10 Rating Likelihood (L) 2 1 Inconceivable Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health 1 First Aid only Slightly effected 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) Discussion at the management level 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) Becomes an issue to the clients 4 Permanent disability Becomes an issue among the public Universities 5 Fatal > 10,000 < 10,000 Recommendation Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Estimate loss (RM) < 100 < 10 < 1000 Form including date for completion. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling 15 - 25 RISK ASSESSMENT Intolerable Lab manual, SOP measures risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control However, if the and further reduction may not be necessary. acceptable A risk identified as LOW may be considered as Recommended Risk Control Satisfactory Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education I Severity ( S ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale Risk Category ( RC ) R = Routine NR = Non Routine Type of Activity HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Sub-Activity No. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Place 50ml of sample into the evaporating dish Assessor: Faraziehan bt Senusi Weight empty evaporating dish Switch on and switch off the equipment. Existing Risk Control 2 RISK CONTROL Hazard Effect Satisfactory goggles ,Lab manual PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, for completion. be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard Type L goggles ,Lab manual PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, 2 2 1 - 4 Satisfactory Might be occur at sometimes in future III Tolerable Heating the sample in oven at 105°C for 30 minutes Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Has not been known to occur after many years 2 2 Satisfactory Significant 5 - 12 II The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual goggles ,Lab manual PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, goggles ,Lab manual PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, Checked by / Date : Ir. Mohd Azahar Mohd Ariff/ 1 Dec 2020 Approved by / Date : Dr. Norhaslinda Nasuha/ 1 Dec 2020 UiTM Reputation Prepared by / Date : Siti Maznah binti Haji Sulaiman / 1/12/2020 Description Is practically impossible and has never occurred Satisfactory Page 1 of 1
Legal : Title of Activity : Extract preparation (soxhlet apparatus) Function / Department : Faculty of Chemical Engineering FMA 1967/ OSHA 1994 Job performed by : Student Section : Makmal Kimia 2 No. Type Hazard Effect L S RPN = L x S RC R Electrical hazard Electric shock R Contaminated soil Disease R Chemical hazard Eye contact, Inhalation, skin contact R (Spillage) Physicall hazard Skin irritation. Skin burn R Electrical hazard Electric shock R Hot surface Skin burn 4 R surface) Physical hazard (Hot Glass broken. Skin burn 2 2 4 1 R Chemical hazard Skin irritation R (Spillage) Chemical hazard Skin irritation. Skin burn 9 8 7 Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health 1 First Aid only Slightly effected 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) Discussion at the management level 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) Becomes an issue to the clients 4 Permanent disability Becomes an issue among the public Universities 5 Fatal < 100 15 - 25 III Intolerable completion. Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as < 1000 > 10,000 < 10,000 Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education 5 - 12 II Significant including date for completion. taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the Severity ( S ) Estimate loss (RM) UiTM Reputation < 10 Has not been known to occur after many years 1 - 4 I Tolerable measures risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control the and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if acceptable A risk identified as LOW may be considered as The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Might be occur at sometimes in future R = Routine Description Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category ( RC ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale NR = Non Routine Is practically impossible and has never occurred Type of Activity 4 1 Satisfactory disconnect the flask from condenser. Cool and rise down the condenser with tap water and (refer check list record) caution. Be very careful and check if leak goggles,.facemask. Handle sample with PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, Satisfactory 5 of mixture change. the mixture with ferrous ammonium sulfate until color homogeneously mixed. Titrate Add 5 drops of ferroin indicator and swirl until Add 100mL of disstilled water into the mixture. caution. (SOP and signage) goggles,.facemask. Handle sample with PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, 2 2 3 Mixture is being refluxed at 70 0C for 30 min. check if leak (refer check list record) sample with caution. Be very careful and goggles,.facemask. Handle PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, 2 2 Satisfactory Satisfactory 2 solution (K Add soil in a round bottom refluxing flask. Add standard 2Cr2O7) and swirl to mix. Add 15 mL H2SO4 into mixture. careful when handling of sample mixtures signage. Proper and extra lab coat, goggles. Facemask. SOP and PPE : Asid resistant Gloves, safety shoes, 2 2 4 1 Satisfactory 1 Equipment name : Top loading balance and Heating mentle. the soil sample Switch ON / Switch OFF the equipment. Weigh check if leak (refer check list record) sample with caution. Be very careful and goggles . Facemask. Handle PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, 2 2 4 1 4 1 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation RISK CONTROL HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Siti Aminah Md Ali Prepared by / Date : Salamiah binti Abdul Hamid / 1 Dis 2020 Checked by / Date : Ir Mohd Azahar Mohd Ariff Approved by / Date : Dr. Norhaslinda Nasuha Existing Risk Control Sub-Activity
Legal : Title of Activity : Effect of particle size on drying rate using Tray Drier (CEV 452) Function / Department : Faculty of Chemical Engineering FMA 1967/ OSHA 1994 Job performed by : Student Section : Makmal Kejuruteraan Kimia S RPN = L x S RC 1 R Electrical hazard Electric shock 1 2 I 2 R (Spillage) hazard Chemical Skin irritation 2 4 I 3 R (Spillage) hazard Chemical Skin irritation 1 2 I 4 Drying the sample. R (Hot surface) Physical hazard Skin burn 2 4 I 5 the equipment . Taking the sample from R (Hot surface) Physical hazard Skin burn 2 4 I 10 9 8 7 6 Rating Likelihood (L) 2 1 Inconceivable Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health 1 First Aid only Slightly effected 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) Discussion at the management level 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) Becomes an issue to the clients 4 Permanent disability Becomes an issue among the public Universities 5 Fatal goggles, Lab manual, SOP PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, goggles ,Lab manual PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, < 100 15 - 25 III Intolerable for completion. be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard < 1000 > 10,000 < 10,000 Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized 5 - 12 II Significant Form including date for completion. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling Severity ( S ) Estimate loss (RM) UiTM Reputation < 10 Action and Time Scale NR = Non Routine Has not been known to occur after many years Is practically impossible and has never occurred 1 - 4 I Tolerable measures risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control However, if the and further reduction may not be necessary. acceptable A risk identified as LOW may be considered as Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Might be occur at sometimes in future Type of Activity R = Routine Description Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category ( RC ) Risk Level goggles, Lab manual, SOP PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, 2 Satisfactory 2 Satisfactory Weighing the sample (AlO2 ) into the three tray before being saturated with water. 2 Satisfactory Carying and placing the sample into the equipment. 2 Satisfactory goggles ,Lab manual, SOP PPE : Gloves, safety shoes,lab coat, Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Existing Risk Control L Switch on and switch off the equipment. Lab manual, SOP 2 Satisfactory HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation RISK CONTROL No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Recommended Risk Control HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Faraziehan bt. Senusi Prepared by / Date : Noor Faezah binti Md Desa / 1/12/2020 Checked by / Date : Ir. Mohd Azahar Mohd Ariff/ 1 Dec 2020 Approved by / Date : Dr. Norhaslinda Nasuha/ 1 Dec 2020
BORANG LAPORAN AUDIT HIRARC Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang LAPORAN PENGENALPASTIAN BAHAYA BISING 1. BIL 1 2. TAHUN 2021 3. NAMA PENTAKSIR 1. NOR AIMI ABDUL WAHAB 2. MARINA MOKHTAR 4. FAKULTI FAKULTI FARMASI 5. TARIKH LAPORAN 28 JUN 2021 6. LAPORAN RINGKAS PENEMUAN PENGENALPASTIAN BAHAYA BISING Penilaian dokumen HIRARC bagi Fakulti Farmasi (FF) telah diadakan secara dalam talian pada 28 Jun 2021. Penilaian dokumen HIRARC ini melibatkan 6 orang staf makmal dan pengurus makmal. Penilaian dokumen HIRARC ini dilaksanakan lanjutan daripada bengkel HIRARC yang telah dijalankan pada 1 Disember 2020. Daripada bengkel ini, semua peserta bengkel perlu menghantar sekurang-kuranya 1 dokumen HIRARC untuk disemak mewakili makmal masing-masing. Fakulti Farmasi telah berjaya menghantar 18 borang HIRARC untuk makmal yang ada di fakulti farmasi. Berdasarkan penilaian yang dilaksanakan terhadap dokumen HIRARC tersebut, semua staf makmal yang terlibat telah berjaya menyediakan dokumen HIRARC berdasarkan kepada garis panduan yang dikeluarkan oleh pihak JKKPN. Setiap dokumen HIRARC tersebut telah dinilai dan berdasarkan hasil perbincangan semasa audit dilaksanakan, komen/cadangan penambahbaikan telah diberikan untuk menambahbaik borang HIRARC. Senarai semak borang HIRARC untuk setiap makmal disertakan bersama borang ini. Staf yang terlibat perlu membuat penambahbaikan yang telah dicadangkan berkaitan makluman laporan HIRARC, pengenalpastian hazard, penaksiran risiko dan kawalan risiko seperti yang telah dicadangkan oleh pihak pemeriksa dan penambahbaikan borang tersebut perlu dikembalikan kepada pihak JKKPN selewatnya pada 16 Julai 2021 melalui pautan google drive yang diberikan. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Purl7r-mDZ6X4zXR_ELSVa3fE69ShQRk?usp=sharing Secara kesuluruhannya, pihak Fakulti Farmasi telah melaksanakan HIRARC dengan baik pada setiap makmal bagi memastikan makmal dan pengguna dalam keadaan selamat. Perlaksanaan HIRARC ini perlu diteruskan untuk menyediakan dan melengkapkan borang HIRARC bagi semua eksperimen dan aktiviti kerja yang dijalankan dalam makmal. Penambahbaikan secara berterusan perlu dilaksanakan dalam memastikan budaya kerja selamat sentiasa diamalkan. 7. VERIFIKASI LAPORAN OLEH SETIAUSAHA SUB-JKKPN FAKULTI KOMEN & JUSTIFIKASI Fakulti menerima komen dan cadangan pihak jawatankuasa. Pemantauan akan dijalankan secara berterusan. NAMA & TANDATANGAN Dr. Mohd Nadzri Bin Mohd Najib JAWATAN TARIKH 9/7/2021
8. PENYEDIA LAPORAN NAMA &TANDATANGAN JAWATAN PENSYARAH KANAN TARIKH 28 JUN 2021
A U D I T HI R A R C BORANG PENILAIAN
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Research (Biotechnology, Physical Pharmacy, Phythochemistry) 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Prepare Standard Solution 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Boleh tambah warning sign sekiranya bersesuaian ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ OK
iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. Dicadangkan untuk menyediakan borang HIRARC bagi pelupusan bahan kimia yang boleh digunakan untuk semua makmal. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Research (Biotechnology, Physical Pharmacy, Phythochemistry) 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Transfer Concentrate Solution 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Boleh tambah warning sign sekiranya bersesuaian SOP penggunaan LEV untuk subactivity 1 &2
ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Sila semak semula berdasarkan cadangan iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Research (Biotechnology, Physical Pharmacy, Phythochemistry) 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Weighing Solution 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK Sub-activity 5 boleh keluarkan dan sediakan 1 form baru. ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Boleh tambah warning sign sekiranya bersesuaian SOP penggunaan LEV untuk subactivity 2
ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Sila semak semula berdasarkan cadangan iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Research (Biotechnology, Physical Pharmacy, Phythochemistry) 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Organic Solvent (perlu lebih spesifik) CTH : Use of organic solvent 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK Sub-activity 5 boleh keluarkan dan sediakan 1 form baru. ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK Is there any hazard related to broken glasware? If yes please include. iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Boleh tambah warning sign sekiranya bersesuaian
Add use of LEV ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Sila semak semula berdasarkan cadangan iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan
Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Lab Sciences (PHD112) 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Eksperimen 1 : Proper Use and Care of Microscope Eksperimen 3 : Cell division Eksperimen 4 : Mendelian genetics Eksperimen 5 : Tissues 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Safety signage or safe work procedure sekiranya ada untuk memastikan pelajar tidak duduk terlalu lama pada satu-satu masa.
ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Berdasarkan perbincangan boleh lebih dari dua dengan justifikasi. iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Lab Sciences (PHD112) 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Eksperimen 2 : 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK Sub-activity 1 if possible specify chemical Combine sub-activity 2 and 3 Sub-activity 3- needle disposal ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ Sub-activity 1 – sharp needle Sub activity 2 - Ok iv Kesan (Effect) √ Sub-activity 1 – needle prick Sub activity 2 – fainted & head injuries Sub-activity 3 – Infection blood related disease C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Safety signage or safe work procedure sekiranya ada untuk memastikan pelajar tidak duduk terlalu lama pada satu-satu masa. Cell Membrane Properties
Sub-activity 3 – SOP for needle disposal ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Berdasarkan perbincangan boleh lebih dari dua dengan justifikasi. iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Pharmeceutical Chemistry 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI EXP 1 : Calibration of a Volumetric pipette 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ Too general. Please refer to lab manual for sub-activity. ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ OK Add lab manual/ SOP weighing balance ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ OK
iii Keparahan (severity) √ If severe adjust severity to 2 iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Perlu cadangan kawalan risiko sekiranya RC>1 ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ Add PIC if needed III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Pharmeceutical Chemistry 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI EXP 2 : Standardization EXP 3 : Chemical Equilibrium 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ Add more sub-activity according to the lab manual ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK Add hazard related to broken glassware where necessary iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK Add effect due to broken glassware C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ OK Add lab manual/ SOP weighing balance ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Tukar berdasarkan perbincangan/rekod kemalangan
iii Keparahan (severity) √ Berdasarkan perbincangan iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Satisfied sekiranya RC=1 ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ No PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Ropishah Idris 3 LOKASI Makmal Pharmeceutical Chemistry 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI EXP 4 : Introduction to pH and buffer Solution EXP 5: Hydrolysis 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ Add more sub-activity according to the lab manual ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK Add hazard related to broken glassware where necessary iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK Add effect due to broken glassware C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ OK Add lab manual/ SOP weighing balance/SOP pH Meter ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Tukar berdasarkan perbincangan/rekod kemalangan
iii Keparahan (severity) √ Berdasarkan perbincangan iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Satisfied sekiranya RC=1 ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ No PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Nazrul Azani Ayub 3 LOKASI Solid Dosage Form 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Lab 1 PHD 212 - Powder 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ If possible separate activity by student and staff. (if too many activity for student For sub-activity 2 – specify type of chemical / ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK Sub-activity 2 -refer to chemical label. iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Boleh tambah warning sign sekiranya bersesuaian. Work instruction for storage of chemical.
ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Sesuaikan berdasarkan rekod kemalangan iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ikut kesesuaian hazad iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada boranng IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Nazrul Azani Ayub 3 LOKASI Solid Dosage Form 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Lab 2 PHD 212 - Powder 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ If possible separate activity by student and staff. (if too many activity for student For sub-activity 2 – specify type of chemical / ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK Sub-activity 2 -refer to chemical label. iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ Boleh tambah warning sign sekiranya bersesuaian. Work instruction for storage of chemical. (Capsule)
ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Sesuaikan berdasarkan rekod kemalangan iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ikut kesesuaian hazad iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Tidak perlu sekiranya RC=1 dan letakkan sebagai “satisfied” ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ If satisfied, remove PIC III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada boranng IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Syahirah Othman 3 LOKASI Semi Solid Dosage Form 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Gel ((Sila rujuk borang HIRARC LAB PHD 212) 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ ii Jenis (Type) √ iii Hazad (Hazard) √ iv Kesan (Effect) √ C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √
iii Keparahan (severity) √ iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ v RC (Risk Category) √ D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
BORANG PENILAIAN LAPORAN HIRARC UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG I. MAKLUMAT AM 1 FAKULTI/UNIT Fakulti Farmasi 2 NAMA PENYEDIA Syahirah Othman 3 LOKASI Sterile Pharmaceutics Lab 4 TAJUK AKTIVITI Introduction To Aseptic Techniques And Standard Operating Procedures In The Clean Room 5 TARIKH PENILAIAN 28 Jun 2021 II. PENILAIAN (Tandakan √ pada petak yang berkenaan beserta ulasan) ADA √ TIADA X ULASAN A Maklumat Laporan HIRARC i Maklumat makmal/penyedia/akta √ Asessor = RP B Pengenalpastian Hazad (Hazard Identification) i Sub-aktiviti (sub- activity) √ OK Combine sub-activity 3 & 4 ii Jenis (Type) √ OK iii Hazad (Hazard) √ OK For sub-activity 2 – faulty technique to break ampoule . iv Kesan (Effect) √ OK For sub-activity 2 -add effect of broken ampoule/glass fragment Effect of broken ampoule / swollen/sprained nail C Penaksiran Risiko (Risk Assessment) i Kawalan risiko sedia ada (existing risk control) √ OK
ii Kebarangkalian (likelihood) √ Sila semak semula berdasarkan cadangan untuk sub-activity 2 iii Keparahan (severity) √ Ok iv RPN (Risk Priority Number) √ Tukar berdasarkan likelihood dan severity yang baru v RC (Risk Category) √ Tukar berdasarkan RPN yang baru D Kawalan Risiko (Risk Control) i Cadangan Kawalan risiko (Recommended risk control) √ Ok for sub-activity 2 (prepare safe work procedure for fixing needle to syringe. ii Orang bertanggungjawab/tarikh tamat/status (PIC/Due date/status) √ PIC LAB for sub -activity 2 III Komen/ Cadangan Penambahbaikan Sila perbaiki borang HIRARC seperti yang telah dicadangkan. Sekiranya ada sebarang pertukaran, contohnya dalam ‘sub-activity’, bahan, procedure atau berlaku kemalangan, mohon penyedia HIRARC untuk membuat semakan semula HIRARC dan membuat penambahbaikan pada borang. IV Maklumat Penilai 1 Nama Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021 Maklumat Penilai 2 Nama Marina Mokhtar Jawatan Pensyarah Kanan Fakulti Jabatan Sains Gunaan Tandatangan Tarikh 28 Jun 2021
A U D I T HI R A R C GAMBAR
A U D I T HI R A R C BORANG HIRARC SEBELUM PEMURNIAN
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : MAKMAL RESEARCH : Prepare Standard Solution Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Pengguna Makmal Research Section : MAKMAL PHYSICAL PHARMACY FAKULTI FARMASI S RPN = L x S RC 1 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 2 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 3 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 4 R Broken glass pipette hand injured 1 4 I 5 R chemical spilled to body and eyes skin allergic & itching Eye injury if splash eye 1 3 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles , face mask SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles 3 SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles 3 3 Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual NR = Non Routine 4 3 Lab Manual,Demo the correct technique SDS,gloves, googles , Lab Manual -Down the burette below eye level while fill up the burette Description HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) the correct technique how to pour solution inside burette Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) how join pipette and pump in correct technique Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress Weighing Chemical Shake the solution in the volumetrik flask Rinse the glassware with diluted solution before use Insert pipette pump into the pipette Pour chemical dilution solution in burette Type of Activity R = Routine Severity ( S ) The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized UiTM Reputation Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion.
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : MAKMAL RESEARCH : Tranfer concentrate solution Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Pengguna Makmal Research Section : MAKMAL RESEARCH FAKULTI FARMASI S RPN = L x S RC 1 R strong concentration chemical spilled skin damage / burn 1 3 I 2 R strong concentration chemical spilled skin damage / burn 1 3 I 3 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 4 R chemical spilled to body and eyes skin allergic & itching Eye injury if splash eye 1 3 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable Type of Activity R = Routine NR = Non Routine A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion. A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Severity ( S ) Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II III Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized UiTM Reputation HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib 3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L Tranfer chemical - tranfer from storage bottle to reagent bottle (staff) Preparing diluted solution from concentrate (staff) Rinse the glassware with diluted solution before use Pour chemical dilution solution in burette Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) how to prepared concentrate chemical Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) the correct technique how to pour solution inside burette Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) how to prepared concentrate chemical Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress SDS ,engineering control(LEV) and PPE mask N95 SDS ,engineering control(LEV) and PPE mask N95 3 SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles 3 3 SDS,gloves, googles , Lab Manual -Down the burette below eye level while fill up the burette Description Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Might be occur at sometimes in future Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : MAKMAL RESEARCH : Weighing Chemicals Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Pengguna Makmal Research Section : MAKMAL RESEARCH FAKULTI FARMASI S RPN = L x S RC 1 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 2 R strong concentration chemical spilled skin damage / burn 1 3 I 3 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 4 R chemical spilled to body and eyes skin allergic & itching Eye injury if splash eye 1 3 I 5 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 5 R comtaminated chemical health dan small exploded 2 8 II Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) how to prepared concentrate chemical Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) the correct technique how to pour solution inside burette Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed SDS,gloves, googles , Lab Manual -Down the burette below eye level while fill up the burette SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles SOP waste management and SDS Put the contaminted waste in the bottle was prepared by Lab Assitant Ropishah/1.12.20/completed Description Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized Severity ( S ) UiTM Reputation Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect L 3 3 4 Existing Risk Control SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles , face mask SDS ,engineering control(LEV) and PPE mask N95 3 SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles 3 3 R = Routine NR = Non Routine Weighing Chemical Preparing diluted solution from concentrate (staff) Rinse the glassware with diluted solution before use Pour chemical dilution solution in burette Tiration technique Dispose Waste Type of Activity
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : MAKMAL RESEARCH : Organic solvent Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Pengguna Makmal Research Section : MAKMAL PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY S RPN = L x S RC 1 R chemical spilled to body and eyes skin allergic & itching Eye injury if splash eye 1 3 I 2 R chemical spilled skin allergic & itching 1 3 I 3 R comtaminated chemical health dan small exploded 2 8 II Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable Shaking the container Dispose organic chemical waste Type of Activity R = Routine NR = Non Routine A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion. A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Severity ( S ) Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II III Description Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Might be occur at sometimes in future Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT No. Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L Experiment 5 : Organic Compounds Put the contaminted waste in the bottle was prepared by Lab Assitant Ropishah/1.12.20/completed SDS,Lab Manual -Down the burette below eye level while fill up the burette 3 Wash immediately use eye bath shower and safety shower Ropishah/1.12.20/completed 3 Wash immediately use water at sink or safety shower SDS,Lab Manual , gloves, googles Ropishah/1.12.20/completed SOP waste management and SDS 4 Sub-Activity Pour organic Chemical in the other container Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized UiTM Reputation Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : AMALI MAKMAL PHD 112 Experiment 1 : Proper use and care of microscope Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Suhaila Mohd Noor & students Section : MAKMAL LAB SCIENCES S RPN = L x S RC 1 NR lab stool height and no backrest slightly back pain reduce not seat at long time 1 3 I 2 R eyes fokus to long at microscope tired eyes Lab Manual - technique focus the sample not to long time 1 3 I 3 R over press the tooth pick will broken cheek scratch Lab Manual -do it slowly sit far from friends 1 1 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. 1 No. Sub-Activity II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion. UiTM Reputation Slightly effected Has not been known to occur after many years Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized Severity ( S ) HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT L 3 3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Sitting at lab stool Satisfied- focus with use both eyes together Satisfied Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed can choose to sit or stand along the lab session Using microscope Swab with tooth pick inside the mouth Type of Activity R = Routine Description NR = Non Routine Is practically impossible and has never occurred
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : AMALI MAKMAL PHD 112 Experiment 2 : Cell membran properties Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Suhaila Mohd Noor & students Section : MAKMAL LAB SCIENCES S RPN = L x S RC 1 R Chemical spilled skin burn ,itching SDS & engineering control(LEV) 1 4 I 2 R splash of blood health problem Lab manual -wipe with alcohol swab 1 3 I 3 R hemophobia fainted ask students before start lab practical 1 4 I 4 R comtaminated needle health problem Lab Manual - disposed into sharp bin 1 3 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion. III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT L 4 3 4 3 No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Tranfer concentrate chemical - tranfer from storage bottle to reagent bottle (staff) Satisfied Satisfied Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed Satisfied Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) for chemical preparation Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress Prick finger with needle Prick finger with needle Used needle Type of Activity R = Routine Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized Severity ( S ) UiTM Reputation Description NR = Non Routine Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Might be occur at sometimes in future
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : AMALI MAKMAL PHD 112 Experiment 3 : Cell devision Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Suhaila Mohd Noor & students Section : MAKMAL LAB SCIENCES S RPN = L x S RC 1 NR lab stool height and no backrest slightly back pain reduce not seat at long time 1 3 I 2 R eyes fokus to long at microscope tired eyes Lab Manual - technique focus the sample not to long time 1 3 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable Severity ( S ) UiTM Reputation RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Satisfied- focus with use both eyes together Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed can choose to sit or stand along the lab session HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT L 3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib 3 No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Sitting at lab stool Use microscope to see the slide Type of Activity R = Routine Description NR = Non Routine Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion.
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : AMALI MAKMAL PHD 112 Experiment 4 : Mendelian genetics Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Suhaila Mohd Noor & students Section : MAKMAL LAB SCIENCES S RPN = L x S RC 1 NR lab stool height and no backrest slightly back pain reduce ro seat at long time 1 3 I 2 R repeatitive work stress and eyes become tired none 1 3 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable Severity ( S ) UiTM Reputation RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status take rest a few minutes before proceed for next cutting Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed can choose to sit or stand along the lab session HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT L 3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib 3 No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Sitting at lab stool Cutting the small photograph(Chromosoms set) Type of Activity R = Routine Description NR = Non Routine Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion.
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : AMALI MAKMAL PHD 112 Experiment 5 : Tissues Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Suhaila Mohd Noor & students Section : MAKMAL LAB SCIENCES S RPN = L x S RC 1 NR lab stool height and no backrest slightly back pain reduce not seat at long time 1 3 I 2 R eyes fokus to long at microscope tired eyes Lab Manual - technique focus the sample not to long time 1 3 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable Severity ( S ) UiTM Reputation RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Satisfied- focus with use both eyes together Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed Suhaila/1.12.20/ completed can choose to sit or stand along the lab session HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT L 3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib 3 No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Sitting at lab stool Using microscope Type of Activity R = Routine Description NR = Non Routine Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years Slightly effected Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized III A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. Risk Category ( RC ) I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. II A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion.
Function / Department : FAKULTI FARMASI UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG KAMPUS BERTAM Title of Activity : AMALI MAKMAL PHD 124 Experiment 1 : Calibration of a volumetric pipette Legal : ACT514-OSHA 1994 (USECHH regulation 2000) Job performed by : Noor Bakhyah Razali & Students Section : MAKMAL PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY S RPN = L x S RC 1 R Broken glass pipette hand injured 1 4 I Rating Likelihood (L) 1 Inconceivable 2 Remote/unlikely 3 Conceivable 4 Possible 5 Most likely Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) 1 First Aid only < 10 2 Minor injury (1 day MC) < 100 3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) < 1000 4 Permanent disability < 10,000 5 Fatal > 10,000 Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Level Action and Time Scale 1 - 4 Tolerable 5 - 12 Significant 15 - 25 Intolerable HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Existing Risk Control Effect RISK CONTROL Recommendation Recommended Risk Control Person in Charge/Due date/ Status Prepare Safe Work procedure(SWP) how join pipette and pump in correct technique Ropishah/1.12.21/ in progress HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER Assessor: Prepared by / Date :Ropishah Idris Checked by / Date : DR Suraya Sulaiman Approved by / Date : DR Mohd Nadzri Mohd Najib L 4 Discussion at the management level Becomes an issue to the clients Becomes an issue among the public Universities Becomes an issue at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education Might be occur at sometimes in future Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized UiTM Reputation Slightly effected 1.Demo the correct technique I A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures Should be implemented and recorded. A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to controlling the hazard and applies temporary measure if required. Actions taken must be documented on the risk assessment Form including date for completion. A HIGH risk requires immediate action to control the hazard as detailed in the hierarchy of control. Actions taken must be Documented on the risk assessment form Including date for completion. II III Insert pipette pump into the pipette Type of Activity R = Routine NR = Non Routine Severity ( S ) Risk Category ( RC ) Description Is practically impossible and has never occurred Has not been known to occur after many years