MONTREAL’S
COUNT AND
Er
Douglas Ins
Calga
CIUSSS ODIM
S FIRST PIT HOMELESS
SUBSEQUENT SURVEY
ric Latimer, Ph.D.
stitute & McGill University
gary, May 4 2016
Financed by
1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1. Key contr
– James M
– Christia
– Alison S
– Downto
– Converc
2. City of Mo
and partn
ributors:
McGregor, co-director of count
an Méthot
Smith
own YMCA
cité
ontreal very helpful sponsor
ner
2
PLAN OF
PRESENTATION
1. Bunadckegrtrooou
2. Objective
3. Methods
4. Some key
5. Strengths
6. Looking t
ouknad PsItTorcyo–unwth, yfinMaollnytreal
es
y results
s and limitations
to the future
3
BACKGROUND
STORY
4
A SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETA
MONTREAL FINALLY DECID
HOMELESS COUNT
End of Chez Soi Montrea
project moveme
end
Movements to homeles
end home-
lessness in D
other provinces, h
countries
TATION OF WHY
DED TO DO A PIT
New Mayor
Denis Coderre
al’s own
ent to
ssness
Decision to count Montreal
homeless by March 31 2015
5
OBJECTIVES OF
MONTRÉAL’S
FIRST POINT-IN-
TIME HOMELESS
COUNT
6
OBJECTIVE 1: COUNT
Unsheltered Emergency
sheltered
Visible homelessnes
1.1 2.1
Public or private spaces, Emergency overnight
no consent or contract shelters
1.2 2.2
Places not intended for Shelters for
permanent human individuals/families
habitation impacted by family
violence
Provisionally accomodated
ss Hidden
homelessness
3.1 3.2
Interim housing Temporarily living with
others, no guarantee or
3.4 prospects of permanent
Institutional care housing
without permanent
housing 3.3
Short-term, temporary
3.5 Reception/accomo- rental accomodations
dation centers for without security of tenure
immigrantes/refugees
7
OBJECTIVE 2: DESCRIBE P
POPULATION
8
METHODS
9
THREE DISTINCT OPERATI
BETWEEN MARCH 24 AND
2015 • Count and admin
evening of March
shelters
– 537 volunteers
– 184 intended se
metro stations,
• 2C4outenmt apnodraarydmhoin
rehabilitation cen
– Mostly organiza
• Administration o
soup kitchens an
26
– 125 volunteers
IONS
26
nistration of questionnaires
h 24 in outside locations and 9
+ 18 street workers
ectors (140 actually covered), all
, parts of underground Montréal
onuissitnragtipornovoifdqeursesatniodnonnaeires in
entre – March 24 to 26
ations’ own staff
of questionnaires in about 55
nd day centers March 25 and
10
A FEW DETAILS
• About 40 restaur
to be visited
• Crackhouses, pe
• 50 decoys deplo
rants contacted ahead of time,
eep shows – not included
oyed on the night of the count
11
PHASE 4 OF DATA COLLEC
• 6 crisis centres
• 1 respite centre
SHELTERS • 2 additional shelters
• 13 centres for victims
TRANSI- • 22 other transitional h
TIONAL • 2 welcome centers fo
HOUSING • 3 provincial prisons
OTHER • SPVM (police operati
PLACES • 18 hospitals
• 53 therapy centres ou
Montréal
CTION – APRIL TO JUNE
s of violence
housing providers
or immigrants/refugee centres
ions centres - cells)
utside Montréal, 13 centres in
12
COMPLEMENTARY SUMME
• More information abo
homeless in Montrea
OBJECTIVES especially homeless
• Understand better wh
August 24 2015 referen
• 4 teams of 2 interview
24 to Sep 14 2015
• StheevmersaellvoergsaunpiztaotiSoenps
• Outdoor and public lo
ER SURVEY
out people who had been
al at the end of March,
youth, Aboriginals, women
ho is homeless in the summer
nce date
wers each in the field from Aug
ps 3h0ad questionnaires filled out
ocations + 85 organizations 13
SOME KEY RE
ESULTS
14
COUNT: WHERE QUESTIONNAIRES ADMINISTERE
OUTSIDE LOCATIONS
HOUSING PROVIDERS
Transitional housing
Shelters
Therapy centers
SOUP KITCHENS AND DAY CENTERS
Total
ED
280
682
337
312
33
560
1522
15
DISTRIBUTION OF 1522 QUESTIONNAIRES INTO 6
OUTSIDE OUTSIDE – VEHICLE – MAKE
LOCATIONS ABANDONED BUILDINGS
N= 177
EMERGENCY SHELTERS
SHELTERS
N=552 HOUSING PROVIDERS WITH
TRANSITIONAL
HOUSING
N=307
OTHER LOCATIONS REHABILITATION CENTERS –
N=61
HIDDEN ROOMING HOUSE (SROs) - S
HOMELESSNESS TEMPORARILY
N=356
NO INFORMATION AS TO W
OTHER MARCH 24 SPENT
N=69
6 CATEGORIES VISIBLE
HOMELESSNESS
ESHIFT SHELTERS –
N=1097
H TIME-LIMITED STAYS
– HOSPITALS 18
STAYING WITH OTHERS
WHERE NIGHT OF
Adjustment method to estimate number of people w
Questionnaires filled out on the str
metro stations)
Additional people who appeared cl
Pro-rated amount to account for m
TOTAL
Adjustment for decoys not found (1
TOTAL ADJUSTED FOR DECOYS NOT
Among 280 questionnaires filled ou
removed to account for their distrib
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN
AFTER REALLOCATION
who were in the street
reet (including 280
learly homeless 110
missed sectors 67
15 / 46): 457
T FOUND 221
678
ut in the street, 103 (36,8%)
bution to other types of housing
N THE STREET
429
19
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PEOPLE HOMELESS OT
QUESTION- TA
NAIRES
OUTSIDE LOCATIONS 177
552
SHELTERS
307
TRANSITIONAL 10
HOUSING 0
HOSPITALS 18
DETENTION CENTRES 33
REHABILITATION 1097
CENTRES IN
MONTREAL
REHABILITATION
CENTERS OUTSIDE
MONTRÉAL
TOTAL
THER THAN HIDDEN HOMELESS
ADJUSTMENT TO TOTAL
ALLY SHEETS ACCOUNT FOR
ADDITONAL PLACES
110 142 429
288 226 1066
287 447 1041
N/A 66 76
N/A 51 51
N/A 136 154
9 157 199
694 1235 301620
TOTAL NUMBER HOMELESS PER 10 000 INHABITA
35 29.7
30 28.1
25
20
15
11.2
10
5
0
Van (ville) Van (région) Calgary
ANTS
26.2
18.8
15.4
Edmonton Toronto Montréal
21
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF HOMELESS PEOPLE SLE
10 1.5
9 8.4 Calgary
8
7
6
5
4 3.9
3
2
1
0
Van (ville) Van
(région)
EEPING OUTSIDE PER 10 000 INHABITANTS
8.8
2.2
1.6
Edmonton Toronto Montréal
22
FINDINGS FROM
QUESTIONNAIRES
• aSmigonnifgicwanhtohmea5l8th%
• Significant role of
half of those on th
hspoemnetl6esmsoonvtehrsalol r(
older homeless)
• Confirmed high pr
• pSoupmumlaetriosnudrvyenyampr
• Many other finding
%nneoetdtsre–a1te3d% with Hep C
youth detention centres –
he street under 30 say they
r(omroinrecionuonnteer,poanret stehtitridngosf for
revalence of LGBTQ (11%)
mriocvsides information on
gs…
23
STRENGTHS
• Administration o
cqeunetsrteiosnannadirseosup
• Exhaustive coun
than hidden hom
• Use of decoys, as
• Summer survey e
questions of inte
of questionnaires in day
p kitchens: more
nt of people in situations other
melessness
s in New York and Toronto
enables drilling down on
erest
24
LIMITATIONS
• Not able to count
• Also, some unsh
missed
• 44 of 184 sectors
• No statistical ana
t hidden homeless
heltered in hidden locations
s missing : loss of precision
alysis
25
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
• (N2o01fi7noalrd2e0c1i8s)ion a
• So far, interest on
maintaining featur
kceoemppinagraabbleilittoy tthoop
methodology
announced on next count
the part of the City in
res of our approach while
opsreofdruocme nnautmiobnearlsly-mandated
26
THANK YOU FOR YOUR A
ATTENTION
27