Energy
Efficiency
in
Europe
Assessment
of
Energy
Efficiency
Action
Plans
and
Policies
in
EU
Member
States
2013
Country
Report
GREECE
SURVEY REPORT
Progress in energy efficiency policies
in the EU Member States -
the experts perspective
Findings from the Energy Efficiency Watch Project
2012
*
Christiane Egger (O.Ö. Energiesparverband)
Summary
Assessment
Introduction
This
report
is
one
of
27
country
reports
published
within
the
Energy-‐Efficiency-‐Watch
project
and
assesses
both
ambition
and
quality
of
EU
Member
States´
energy
efficiency
action
plans
and
policy
implementation
(see
more
at
www.energy-‐efficiency-‐watch.org).
Both,
the
NEEAP
screening
and
the
expert
survey
indicate
that
Greece
has
neither
an
ambitious
nor
an
innovative
energy
efficiency
policy.
Many
aspects
of
the
policy
package
can
still
be
strengthened.
According
to
the
NEEAP,
the
interim
saving
target
for
2010
(2,8%)
has
been
clearly
exceeded
(savings
of
5.1%
to
10,9%
reached).
However,
the
main
reason
for
these
energy
savings
is
the
economic
recession
which
has
hit
Greece
very
hard
during
the
reporting
period.
It
is
not
possible
to
clearly
separate
the
impact
of
the
economic
recession
and
the
savings
attributable
to
political
measures
in
the
second
NEEAP.
With
regard
to
ESD
target
achievement,
45%
of
the
experts
surveyed
state
that
the
ESD
target
will
not
be
reached.
The
sectoral
assessment
of
the
NEEAP
is
as
follows:
Sectoral
Assessment
• The
public
sector
is
the
only
sector
that
has
received
above
average
rating
in
the
NEEAP
screening.
It
implements
energy
saving
measures
in
public
buildings,
demonstration
projects
in
schools
or
information
campaigns.
The
Greek
public
sector
has
set
the
framework
conditions
for
public
procurement,
has
implemented
several
energy
saving
measures
in
public
buildings,
has
introduced
energy
management
systems
and
launched
pilot
projects
on
energy
service
contracting.
However,
the
experts
surveyed
stated
that
the
public
sector
was
the
sector
with
the
greatest
implementation
gaps.
The
result
of
the
NEEAP
screening
therefore
differs
from
the
experts
survey
in
this
point.
• Features
of
the
Greek
governance
framework
are
horizontal
measures,
the
promotion
of
energy
services,
the
development
of
an
information
system
to
monitor
energy
efficiency
or
the
consideration
of
different
actors.
• Greece
has
furthermore
set
minimum
energy
performance
standards
for
buildings.
These
are
complemented
by
economic
and
financial
support
and
energy
performance
certificates.
Innovative
systems
in
buildings
are
planned
to
be
demonstrated
on
the
basis
of
voluntary
agreements.
The
NEEAP
does
not
mention
audits
or
buildings
specific
advice.
Furthermore,
buildings
specific
information
campaigns
as
well
as
education
and
training
for
professionals
of
the
buildings
sector
are
not
mentioned.
• Energy
efficient
appliances
are
mainly
promoted
through
EU
legislation:
The
Directives
on
Ecodesign
and
energy
labelling
have
been
transposed
and
are
the
core
of
the
Greek
policy
package.
Some
information
tools
have
been
developed
on
national
level.
• Likewise
energy
efficiency
in
industry
is
promoted
mainly
through
Ecodesign
and
energy
labelling
requirements.
In
addition,
excise
duties
for
gas
and
electricity
are
set
above
the
minimum
rate.
A
programme
for
the
development
of
green
business
parks
has
furthermore
been
established.
• The
policy
package
for
transport
focuses
on
financial
incentives
for
the
renewal
of
the
vehicle
fleet.
It
is
accompanied
by
investments
in
public
transport
and
non-‐motorized
transport.
Conclusions
The
ambition
of
the
Greek
policy
framework
is
medium,
and
large
potentials
remain
untapped.
Improvements
could
be
the
following:
• It
is
advised
to
strengthen
most
of
the
aspects
of
the
policy
package
for
appliances,
in
particular
economic
incentives
and
education,
and
training
for
retail
staff
could
be
established.
• The
overall
strategy
of
the
public
sector
is
not
described.
Targets
for
the
energy
consumption
of
public
buildings
have
not
been
set
either.
• As
to
industry,
it
is
advisable
to
promote
obligations/commitments
to
energy
management
and
energy
audits
and
to
set
economic
incentives
as
well
as
energy
saving
targets.
• In
view
of
better
connecting
the
measures
in
the
transport
sector,
it
is
recommanded
to
adress
more
the
residential
sector
as
potential
user
of
public
transport,
bikes
and
pedestrian
paths
by
means
of
campaigns
and
financial
incentives.
In
this
context,
it
is
advised
to
push
vehicle
users
to
use
other
modes
of
transport
by
a
stronger
regulation.
2
Screening
of
the
NEEAP
Overarching
Energy
Efficiency
Governance
Framework
long-‐term
strategy
Comprehensiveness
of
policy
package
other
actors
involved
energy-‐agencies
Long-‐term
EE
target(s)
and
• No
long-‐term
targets
mentioned;
coordina^on/financing
strategy
• Reference
to
EU
targets
for
2020
energy
services
horizontal
measures
Involvement
of
non-‐ • Municipalities,
ESCOs
and
a
research
institute
are
MRV
governmental
and
market
actors,
part
of
the
strategy
and
sub-‐national
authorities
Energy
agencies
and
climate
• Energy
agencies
are
not
mentioned
protection
agencies
EE
mechanisms
for
overall
• A
green
fund
has
been
established;
coordination
and
financing
• Financing
is
also
available
through
other
programmes
Favourable
framework
conditions
• Framework
conditions
have
been
adopted;
for
energy
services
• Details
of
energy
performance
contracts
have
been
regulated
and
a
standard
contract
will
be
published
Horizontal
measures
• Support
for
R&D;
Voluntary
agreements
between
the
public
and
private
sector
for
energy
saving
in
commercial
buildings
planned
Monitoring,
reporting
and
• Top-‐down
method
used
for
quantification
of
verification
most
savings;
• Attempt
to
take
account
of
impact
of
economic
recession
Public
Sector
Comprehensiveness
of
policy
package
Public
sector
strategy
• No
strategy
for
the
public
sector
outlined;
• Promotion
of
integrated
energy
planning
of
public
sector
strategy
role
model
municipalities
public
procurement
public
buildings
Role
model,
transparency,
and
• Information
campaigns;
adequacy
of
package
demonstration
• Demonstration
of
energy
efficient
buildings;
• Promotion
of
energy
efficiency
in
schools
Public
procurement
• Establishment
of
an
office
to
coordinate
and
implement
public
procurement;
• Requirements
have
been
set
for
some
appliances
Public
buildings
• Energy
management
systems
are
used;
• Pilot
projects
on
energy
efficiency
in
buildings
and
energy
service
contracting;
• No
targets
mentioned;
Adequacy
of
policy
package
• Different
actors
have
been
considered;
• Supply
and
demand
side
are
partly
addressed;
• The
saving
potentials
are
partly
considered
3
Residential
Sector
-‐
Buildings
MEPS
Comprehensiveness
of
policy
package
other
regula^ons
economic
incen^ves
Minimum
Energy
Performance
• MEPS
have
been
established;
financing
instruments
Standards
(MEPS)
• No
roadmap
for
tightening
of
MEPS
EPCs
Other
regulations
advice
and
audits
• The
issuance
of
a
buildings
permit
is
linked
to
the
informa^on
Economic
incentives
requirement
that
60%
of
the
needs
for
domestic
demonstra^on
hot
water
is
covered
by
solar
thermal
systems
educa^on
and
training
Financing
instruments
adequacy
of
package
• Financial
support
is
available
for
energy
saving
Energy
performance
certificates
measures
in
old
buildings;
Support
is
granted
for
MEPS
(EPCs)
central
solar
thermal
systems
and
the
economic
incen^ves
replacement
of
old
air-‐conditioners
energy
labels
Energy
advice
and
audits
informa^on
tools
Information
tools
• Low
interest
loans,
reduced
VAT
and
grants
are
educa^on
and
training
available
for
the
installation
of
central
solar
adequacy
of
package
Demonstration
projects
thermal
systems
Education
and
training
for
• Energy
performance
certificates
are
mandators
stakeholders
for
all
buildings
(>50m2)
that
undergo
a
complete
Adequacy
of
policy
package
renovation;
Energy
performance
certificates
are
also
mandatory
for
existing
buidings
when
they
are
sold
or
leased,
and
for
all
buildings
of
the
public
sector
• Not
mentioned
• Several
information
and
education
campaigns
are
mentioned;
Not
clear
whether
these
address
the
buildings
sector
• Innovative
systems
in
buildings
are
planned
to
be
demonstrated
on
the
basis
of
voluntary
agreements;
• Upgrading
of
four
industrial
buildings
to
nearly
zero
energy
buildings
• Not
mentioned
• Potentials
are
considered;
• Policy
package
is
rather
balanced
Residential
Sector
-‐
Appliances
Comprehensiveness
of
policy
package
Minimum
Energy
Performance
• The
Ecodesign
Directive
has
been
implemented
Standards
(MEPS)
Economic
incentives
• Not
mentioned
Energy
labels
• The
energy
labelling
Directive
has
been
implemented
Information
tools
• Smart
meters
are
promoted;
• The
Public
Power
Corporation
is
obliged
to
provide
information
on
energy
efficient
appliances
Education
and
training
for
retail
• Not
mentioned
staff
and
other
supply
chain
actors
Adequacy
of
policy
package
• The
policy
package
is
based
on
the
implementation
of
EU
requirements;
Most
aspects
of
the
policy
package
could
be
strenghtened
4
Industry
and
Tertiary
Sector
Comprehensiveness
of
policy
package
standards
Standards
for
equipment,
• The
Ecodesign
Directive
has
been
implemented
ES&A
targets
production
process,
products
obliga^ons
economic
incen^ves
Energy
savings
and
action
targets
• Not
mentioned
tradable
permits
for
individual
companies
energy
taxa^on
energy
labelling
Obligations
/
commitments
• According
to
the
MURE
database
voluntary
adequacy
of
package
agreements
in
the
industrial
sector
are
promoted;
• Companies
wishing
to
participate
will
have
to
agree
on
action
plans
to
reduce
energy
consumption
Economic
incentives
• Not
mentioned
Tradable
permits
• Only
EU
ETS
Energy
or
CO2
taxation
• Excise
duty
for
natural
gas
and
electricity
above
minimum
rate
Energy
labelling
• EU
energy
labelling
regulation
Other
sectors
• Several
measures
in
the
agricultural
sector.
Adequacy
of
policy
package
• The
supply
and
demand
side
of
energy
efficiency
markets
have
been
addressed
Transport
Sector
planning
instruments
Comprehensiveness
of
policy
package
regulatory
instruments
economic
incen^ves
Planning
instruments
• Concrete
measures
to
support
public
transport
informa^on
and
non-‐motorised
transport
(e.g.
urban
mobility
R&D
support
plans)
have
been
set
up
adequacy
of
package
• The
integrated
energy
planning
of
municipalities
partly
also
addresses
mobility
Regulatory
instruments
• Only
public
procurement
mentionned
Economic
incentives
• Tax
incentives
are
available
• Mainly
due
to
EU
Information
and
advice
• Information
campaigns
and
trainings
promote
eco-‐driving
R&D
support
• Not
mentioned
Adequacy
of
policy
package
• Potentials
considered
• The
policy
mix
has
a
strong
focus
on
road
vehicles
(e.g.
no
awareness
campaign
on
public
transport)
5
Findings
from
the
Expert
Survey
In
2011
and
2012,
Energy-‐Efficiency-‐Watch
Greece:
overall
ambiUon
of
the
conducted
a
quantitative
and
qualitative
survey
with
energy
efficiency
policies
national
experts
on
implementation
of
energy
efficiency
policies
in
EU
Member
States.
Only
a
low
percentage
of
respondents
deem
that
8%
24%
the
Greek
policy
is
generally
ambitious
(8%,
30
24%
questionnaires
were
completed
for
Greece)
while
44%
of
the
respondents
think
that
the
Greek
energy
44%
efficiency
policy
is
ambitious
in
at
least
a
few
sectors
and
24%
consider
the
ambition
as
generally
generally,
rather
low
low.
More
than
60%
believe
that
the
ESD
target
will
ambi^ous
in
a
few
sectors,
less
so
in
most
others
not
be
achieved
or,
if
achieved,
will
not
lead
to
ambi^ous
in
a
range
of
sectors,
less
so
in
a
few
others
much
savings.
With
regard
to
the
progress
made
generally,
rather
high
since
the
last
NEEAP,
around
half
of
the
respondents
consider
that
good
progress
was
made
while
the
other
half
of
the
respondents
consider
that
only
little
progress
was
made.
The
most
important
gap
in
energy
efficiency
policies
was
identified
in
the
public
sector
(by
more
than
40%
of
the
respondents,
this
is
the
highest
score
for
the
public
sector
in
all
Member
States).
The
biggest
single
barrier
to
energy
efficiency
is
financing
according
to
60%
of
the
experts.
The
economic
crisis
had
a
significant
impact
on
Greece.
The
surveyed
experts
observe
that
the
related
reduction
in
service
and
industrial
output
as
well
as
a
need
for
general
cost
reductions
led
to
a
decrease
in
energy
consumption.
As
an
effect
of
the
crisis,
however,
more
use
is
also
made
of
public
transport.
Access
to
finance
and
investments
has
become
very
difficult.
With
regard
to
the
public
sector
experts
stated
that
funding
for
demonstration
projects
exists,
including
educational
buildings
and
energy
contracting.
Some
incentives
were
set
for
energy
efficient
public
transport
and
bike
lanes
were
built.
CRES,
a
national
enitity
for
the
promotion
of
energy
efficiency
and
renewable
energy,
has
seen
important
budget
cuts.
On
the
residential
sector
experts
report
that
strict
regulations
are
in
place
for
new
buildings
which
seem
to
be
well
received.
Furthermore,
a
funding
programme
for
building
refurbishment
was
set
up.
Among
specific
energy
efficiency
policy
instruments
energy
audits
and
energy
efficiency
funds
are
seen
as
the
most
effective.
Greece:
achievement
of
naUonal
energy
savings
target
16%
45%
target
will
not
be
achieved
3%
18%
target
will
be
achieved
but
will
not
lead
to
a
lot
of
addi^onal
savings
18%
target
will
probably
be
achieved
target
will
certainly
be
achieved
not
aware
of
energy
savings
target
6
Greece:
the
most
important
gap
in
energy
efficiency
policies
others/
comment
5%
energy
sector
10%
transport
sector
15%
industry
&
service
sector
15%
public
sector
45%
residen^al
sector
10%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Good
Practice
Examples
Greece
succeeded
in
establishing
a
good
policy
framework
for
the
public
sector
which
can
be
seen
as
good
practice
example.
Greece
is
strong
setting
a
role
model
through
information
campaigns,
demonstration
of
energy
efficient
buildings,
and
promoting
of
energy
efficiency
in
schools.
As
well
measures
for
public
procurement
and
public
buildings
are
good.
The
buildings
sector
shows
balanced
results.
Apart
of
advice
&
audits
and
education
&
training
which
are
not
mentioned
all
measures
except
one
are
balanced
and
could
be
improved.
Demonstration
objects
are
very
good
integrated
and
do
not
need
improvement.
Good
practice
examples
could
be
derived
using
following
NEEAPs.
Germany
can
be
used
as
a
good
practice
example
concerning
information,
finance
&
incentives
and
governance
framework.
Minimum
energy
performance
standards
are
in
place
for
new
and
existing
buildings
undergoing
major
renovations.
There
is
also
a
regular
strengthening
of
targets
and
obligations.
France
is
a
good
example
for
enforcement
mechanisms.
An
official
Energy
Performance
Certificate
is
issued
in
Ireland
for
each
home
which
receives
and
energy
upgrade
detailing
all
energy
efficiency
measures
carried
out
on
the
house.
Energy
performance
certificates
are
also
mandatory
in
Germany
at
time
of
sale
or
lease
and
contain
improvement
recommendations.
Other
measures
as
the
Act
on
the
Promotion
of
Renewable
Thermal
Energy
have
additional
impact
on
energy
efficiency.
Through
the
promotion
programmes
of
the
state-‐owned
KfW
bank,
economic
incentives
in
form
of
either
direct
grants
or
low-‐interest
loans
for
EE
in
buildings
are
available
for
both
single
measures
and
comprehensive
retrofits
as
well
for
new
construction.
Luxembourg
is
a
good
practice
example
for
a
comprehenisve
offer
of
training
and
education
of
professionals
of
the
buildings
sector.
The
appliances
sector
is
both
for
Greece
and
cross-‐country
one
of
the
weakest
sectors.
Nevertheless
some
good
practices
can
be
found
in
the
NEEAPs
as
well.
Information
for
instance
is
provided
through
labels
that
uses
standards
and
therefore
give
orientation
which
can
be
found
in
the
Netherlands.
As
well
information
centres,
websites
and
web
based
tools
e.g.
for
calculating
energy
savings
provide
help
and
orientation.
Those
can
be
found
in
the
Netherlands
and
especially
in
France.
Concerning
the
governance
framework
the
implementation
of
the
Ecodesign
Directive
on
national
level
can
be
seen
as
first
step.
In
France
there
is
additionally
a
co-‐operation
with
the
lighting
trade
union
to
remove
the
least
efficient
products
from
the
market.
Financial
incentives
that
target
businesses
are
available
in
the
Netherlands.
Incentives
are
for
instance
energy
investment
allowances
and
tax
rebates
for
purchase
of
energy
efficient
equipement.
A
tax
incentive
is
also
provided
by
Ireland.
The
corresponding
list
of
efficient
equipment
is
also
used
used
as
a
best
practice
list
by
public
bodies
for
public
procurement.
This
instrument
thus
links
public
and
private
sector
purchases
and
creates
a
greater
market
for
the
eligible
energy
efficient
products.
R&D
funding
(Energy
Research
Subsidy)
is
available
for
energy
saving
technologies
but
it
is
not
clear
whether
the
subsidy
will
be
available
also
in
future.
7
Disclaimer
The
sole
responsibility
for
the
content
of
this
publication
lies
with
the
authors.
It
does
not
necessarily
reflect
the
opinion
of
the
European
Union.
Neither
the
EACI
nor
the
European
Commission
are
responsible
for
any
use
that
may
be
made
of
the
information
contained
therein.
The
analysis
performed
here
is
based
almost
exclusively
on
the
information
provided
in
the
NEEAPs.
Consequently,
a
low
score
for
any
of
the
criteria
analysed
could
also
be
the
result
of
a
NEEAP
lacking
detailed
information.
The
purpose
of
this
assessment
is
not
an
absolute
ranking
among
Member
States
but
is
focusing
on
each
Member
State’s
individual
conditions.
The
Project
In
2006,
the
European
Union
adopted
the
Directive
on
energy
end-‐use
efficiency
and
energy
services
("ESD").
The
Directive
sets
an
indicative
energy
saving
target
of
9
%
by
2016
as
well
as
obligations
on
national
authorities
regarding
energy
savings,
energy
efficient
procurement
and
the
promotion
of
energy
efficiency
and
energy
services.
It
requires
Member
States
to
submit
three
National
Energy
Efficiency
Action
Plans
(NEEAPs),
scheduled
for
2007,
2011
and
2014.
The
Energy-‐Efficiency-‐Watch
Project
aims
to
facilitate
the
implementation
of
the
Energy
Service
Directive
and
the
Energy
Efficiency
Directive.
This
Intelligent
Energy
Europe
project
tried
to
portray
the
progress
made
in
implementation
of
energy
efficiency
policies
since
the
Energy
Service
Directive
via
NEEAPs
screening
and
an
extensive
EU
wide
expert
survey.
www.energy-‐efficiency-‐watch.org
The
Authors
Ralf
Schüle,
Thomas
Madry,
Vera
Aydin,
Jonas
Fischer,
Jan
Kaselofsky,
Thorsten
Koska,
Carolin
Schäfer-‐
Sparenberg,
Lena
Tholen
(Wuppertal
Institute)
Daniel
Becker,
Nikolas
Bader
(Ecofys)
Christiane
Egger
(O.Ö.
Energiesparverband)
with
contributions
by
Reinhold
Priewasser,
Michaela
Kloiber
(University
of
Linz)
Nils
Borg
(eceee),
Dominique
Bourges
(Fedarene),
Peter
Schilken
(Energy
Cities)
List
of
Abbreviations
EE
–
Energy
Efficiency,
EED
–
Energy
Efficiency
Directive,
EPC
–
Energy
Performance
Certificates,
EPDB
–
Energy
Performance
of
Buildings
Directive,
ES&A
Targets
-‐
Energy
Savings
and
Action
Targets,
ESCO
–
Energy
Service
Company,
ESD
–
Energy
Service
Directive,
EU
–
European
Union,
EEW
–
Energy-‐Efficiency-‐Watch,
MEPS
–
Minimum
Energy
Performance
Standards,
MRV
–
Monitoring,
Reporting
and
Verification,
MURE
–
Mesures
d’Utilisation
Rationelle
de
l’Energie,
NEEAP
–
National
Energy
Efficiency
Action
Plan,
R&D
–
Research
and
Development
Photography
Credits:
PhotoDisc,
iStock,
www.openclipart.org