TECHNCIAL APPENDIX TA-4.6 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

DRAFT DESIGN REPORT

August 2010

Access 390
I-390 Exit 16
Interchange Reconstruction Project
P.I.N. 4390.17
Monroe County
Town of Brighton
City of Rochester

TECHNCIAL APPENDIX
TA-4.6

VISUAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT REPORT

our people and our passion in every project

New York State Department of Transportation
I-390 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
AT ROUTE 15A AND ROUTE 15 (EXIT 16)

VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

TOWN OF BRIGHTON, MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK

P.I.N. 4390.17.111 / August 2010

28 East Main Street // 200 First Federal Plaza // Rochester, NY 14614-1909 // tel: 585.232.5135

Table of Contents

Page Number
1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................1
2. Methodology ..................................................................................................................1
3. Project Description .......................................................................................................3
4. Regional Landscape and Land Use..............................................................................4
5. Landscape Districts ......................................................................................................5
6. Viewshed and Key Viewpoints .....................................................................................9
7. Viewer Groups ...............................................................................................................9
8. Assessment of Impacts...............................................................................................10
9. Mitigation .....................................................................................................................24
10. Summary......................................................................................................................24
11. References...................................................................................................................25

Page i

Table of Contents

Page Number
1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................1
2. Methodology ..................................................................................................................1
3. Project Description .......................................................................................................3
4. Regional Landscape and Land Use..............................................................................4
5. Landscape Districts ......................................................................................................5
6. Viewshed and Key Viewpoints .....................................................................................9
7. Viewer Groups ...............................................................................................................9
8. Assessment of Impacts...............................................................................................10
9. Mitigation .....................................................................................................................24
10. Summary......................................................................................................................24
11. References...................................................................................................................25

Page i

Table of Contents

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1
Figure 2 Proposed Alternative 2 & Viewpoint Location Map...........................................2
Figure 2A Viewshed Map......................................................................................................6
Figure 3 Landscape Districts ..........................................................................................12
Figure 4 Viewpoint 7 – Existing ......................................................................................13
Figure 5 Viewpoint 7 – Proposed Alternative ................................................................14
Figure 6 Viewpoint 19 – Existing ....................................................................................15
Figure 7 Viewpoint 19 – Proposed Alternative ..............................................................16
Figure 8 Viewpoint 21 – Existing ....................................................................................17
Figure 9 Viewpoint 21 – Proposed Alternative ..............................................................18
Figure 10 Viewpoint 22 – Existing ....................................................................................19
Figure 11 Viewpoint 22 – Proposed Alternative ..............................................................20
Figure 12 Viewpoint 20 – Existing ....................................................................................21
Figure 13 Viewpoint 20 – Proposed Alternative ..............................................................22
Figure 14 Viewpoint 2 – Existing ......................................................................................23
Figure 15 Viewpoint 2 – Proposed Alternative ................................................................24

Page ii

Visual Impact Assessment

1. Introduction
The proposed project is located in the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York as shown in
Figure 1, and addresses the corridor needs along I-390 at Kendrick Road, Route 15 (West Henrietta
Road) and Route 15A (East Henrietta Road) at Interchange 16A and 16B. This report presents the
findings of a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for the proposed alternative as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1 – Project Location

Kendrick
Road

Project
Limits

2. Methodology
The purpose of this Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is to evaluate the proposed project and to assess
its impacts, both positive and negative, on the visual resources of the project area. The process of
this visual assessment consists of the following:

Perform a preliminary investigation of the project site to determine the physical/visual limits
of the affected environment. Within the context of the project area’s regional landscape,
identify and document landscape units representing distinct visual experiences. Determine
the existing composite viewshed of the project area in the field and map its limits.
Identify the visually sensitive resources within the project area.

Page 1

VP-22 VP-20
VP-19
ERIE CANAL
M
VP-21 C
VP-2 H

VP

MONROE MONROE Proposed Alternative 3 & Viewpoint
COUNTY COUNTY Location Map
HEALTH HOSPITAL

DEPT.

P-7 BRIGHTON
TOWN
PARK I-390 Interchange Improvements
ERIE CANAL at Route 15A and Route15
Visual Impact Assessment
Source: Google Maps
FIGURE 2

Visual Impact Assessment

Identify the major viewer groups associated with the project area to determine potential view
exposure and general viewer sensitivity within the limits of the existing composite viewshed.

Identify and photograph key viewpoints which best represent critical views of the visual
environment, in conjunction with the project sponsor

Analyze the existing visual resources and their qualities within the project area. Define the
visual character of each landscape unit and document pattern elements and pattern
character. Document findings and assumptions of view exposure and view sensitivity to
determine viewer response.

Assess the visual impacts of the proposed project. Identify and discuss positive and
negative impacts. Prepare photo-simulations of the proposed project from the key
viewpoints to illustrate changes to the visual resources of the project area. Determine and
summarize probable viewer response to those changes.

Determine and define what mitigation measures, if any, can be employed to eliminate or
lessen adverse impacts and enhance or create positive impacts to the visual resources of
the project area.

3. Project Description

I-390 traverses north-south on the west of the City of Rochester, and serves as a major north-south
highway corridor through the Rochester region. The project area covered in the VIA includes the I-
390 interchanges at Kendrick Road, Route 15 (West Henrietta Road) and Route 15A (East Henrietta
Road) (Interchange 16A and 16B)

The Null and one Build Alternative (Alternative 3) were developed for this project. The Null and Build
Alternatives are described below:

Null Alternative
The Null Alternative provides only for the continued maintenance of the project corridor. No
operational or capacity improvements are proposed under this alternative.

Alternative 3
Alternative 3 will include improvements to reduce congestion and reduce the potential for
congestion related and other accidents. A detailed description of the features of this alternative
follows.

Improvements at Kendrick Road/East River Road: the existing I-390 southbound ramp to East
River Road will be reconstructed and realigned. A deceleration lane will be added to I-390. This
will provide room for a new on-ramp at this location.

The new on-ramp will accommodate southbound Rte. 15 traffic destined for I-390 southbound and
will eliminate the need for some traffic to traverse over Rte. 15A on the south frontage road to
reach I-390 southbound. The ramp will also serve traffic from the University of Rochester area via
Kendrick Road. To accommodate the additional traffic and improve access to the University of
Rochester campus, a new roundabout will be constructed at Kendrick Road and East River Road.

Page 3

Visual Impact Assessment

A new ramp will be constructed from Kendrick Road to I-390 northbound. This will serve traffic
from the University of Rochester area.

The addition of the Kendrick Road on-ramp was considered at the request of the UofR. The
desire to provide a full interchange at Kendrick Road was identified early in studies compiled for
the UofR and their long-range expansion plan. New access from East River Road (near Kendrick
Road) to I-390 southbound was already proposed as part of the Southern Corridor study.
Geometrics and the proximity of the Erie Canal preclude an off-ramp from I-390 northbound to
Kendrick Road. A new on-ramp from Kendrick Road to I-390 northbound was found to be feasible
and constructible.

Improvements at Rte. 15: A new loop ramp will be constructed from Rte. 15 northbound to I-390
northbound. Rte. 15 southbound traffic to I-390 northbound will continue to use the existing ramp.
Rte. 15 will be restriped to accommodate the new lane configuration. A right turn lane will be
striped for Rte. 15 southbound at the I-390 ramp and a right turn lane will be added on Rte. 15
northbound at the north frontage road across from E. River Road. The left turn move from Rte. 15
southbound to the service road will be eliminated.

Improvements at Rte. 15A: On I-390 the existing northbound mainline outside lane, which now
exits to Rte. 15A and provides access to Rte. 15 will be extended under the Rte. 15A bridge. This
ramp will split to provide a new loop ramp to Rte. 15A southbound and to provide a new access
directly to Rte. 15 at East River Road. A new ramp will be constructed from I-390 to Rte. 15A
northbound. The existing ramp from Rte. 15A southbound to I-390 northbound will be relocated.
This ramp includes a grade-separated crossing over the new ramp to Rte. 15A. The bridge
carrying Rte. 15A over the Erie Canal will be replaced and widened to provide 4 through travel
lanes with two auxiliary lanes (one in each direction). Rte. 15A will be restriped to provide a dual
left turn lane at the I-390 southbound and I-390 northbound ramps. The I-390 northbound ramp
will be widened to accept the dual left and improve merge distances.

A new auxiliary lane will be added to the I-390 northbound to I-590 northbound connector. This
will allow a vehicle entering I-390 to weave across one lane and then use the new auxiliary lane to
merge onto I-590. The project will also include pavement and bridge rehabilitations where
appropriate, new signs, signals and pavement markings and improvements to bicycle and
pedestrian facilities on affected highways.

4. Regional Landscape and Land Use

The project area lies within the Erie – Ontario Lowland Plains region of New York State, south of Lake
Ontario. The topography of the region can be characterized by its flat lands and rolling hills. The
project corridor lies within the Erie Canal corridor in the Town of Brighton, southwest of the City of
Rochester.

Land uses along this corridor consist primarily of commercial, office, and institutional, with smaller
amounts of residential, and recreational uses provided by the Erie Canal. I-390 runs alongside the
Erie Canal and crosses over it between NYS Route 15A and Clinton Avenue South. The corridor is
the result of a highly manipulated landscape over time, from the construction of the Erie Canal to the
later construction of I-390, and the adjacent commercial development. The rolling topography and
slopes are engineered and vegetation is planted or successional on steeper slopes bordering the Erie
Canal. Roads surrounding the I-390 corridor generally consist of two-lanes and four-lanes with
occasional turn lanes and varying degrees of development.

Page 4

Visual Impact Assessment

Topography within the area is moderately varied consisting primarily of rolling and nearly level areas
to the north and south of the Erie Canal corridor. The slopes along the north side of the Erie Canal
are steep in the project area. Most of the I-390 corridor is depressed within the project area and its
visibility to and from the surrounding land uses is limited. Where it borders residential neighborhoods,
it is buffered by the canal and screened by vegetated slopes.

The project parallels and reinforces a natural border (the Erie Canal) between the City of Rochester to
the north and the Town of Brighton to the south.

Figure 2A, Viewshed Map, illustrates the visibility of the project area. This map depicts the area
potentially visible from the viewpoint of travelers at a number of points simultaneously along the
roadway and the viewpoint of residential/employees adjacent to the project.

The project viewshed for the proposed improvements are generally limited to the actual travel route of
I-390 and its access roads, as well as the perpendicular overhead cross streets adjacent to the
corridor. Due to the depressed nature of the corridor, there are no significant views or vistas afforded
from the corridor. The depressed nature of the canal together with its predominately heavily
vegetated edges also prohibits any significant views of the Erie Canal from the I-390 corridor. The
most notable view is of the ornately detailed Monroe County Hospital building extending above the
treetops perched at the top of the north edge of the I-390 corridor.

5. Landscape Districts

Landscape districts represent distinct visual experiences within a project area. Identification of these
districts provides a framework for visual assessment that allows an assessment of the proposed
alternative and its effects to the existing environment. Within the I-390 project corridor, three
landscape districts can be identified (Figure 3).

Landscape District I – I-390 & Erie Canal:
Landscape District I includes the I-390 / Erie Canal corridor from west of the Kendrick Road
overpass to where I-390 crosses over the Erie Canal east of East Henrietta Road. I-390 and the
canal are depressed into the landscape in this area and are surrounded by commercial, office,
institutional, and residential land uses. I-390 runs relatively straight through this district with an up
ramp road connection to East River Road just east of Kendrick Road, and on and off ramps to I-
390 at Route 15 (West Henrietta Road) and Route 15A (East Henrietta Road). The landscape
immediately south along I-390 consists of fields gently sloping down towards I-390 and light
vegetation. I-390 and the land uses to the south of the corridor are in clear view of each other. To
the north, I-390 and the Erie Canal are shielded from view by their depressed location, vegetation,
and the surrounding land uses. The canal is at a lower elevation than the I-390 corridor and is
edged by a steep heavily vegetated slope. This vegetated slope acts as a buffer between the I-
390/Erie Canal corridor and land uses to the north between Kendrick Road and the project end

Page 5

ERIE CANAL M
C
H

Legend
Viewshed Area

MONROE MONROE Viewshed Map
COUNTY COUNTY
HEALTH HOSPITAL

DEPT.

BRIGHTON I-390 Interchange Improvements
TOWN at Route 15A and Route15
PARK Visual Impact Assessment
ERIE CANAL

Source: Google Maps
FIGURE 2A

M
C
H

ERIE CANAL

MONROE MONROE Landscape Districts Landscape Districts
COUNTY COUNTY Landscape District I - I-390 & Erie Canal
HEALTH HOSPITAL Landscape District II - Residential
Landscape District III - Commercial &
DEPT. Institutional

BRIGHTON
TOWN
PARK

ERIE CANAL

Source: Google Maps I-390 Interchange Improvements
FIGURE 3 at Route 15A and Route15
Visual Impact Assessment

Visual Impact Assessment

east of East Henrietta Road. The I-390 / Erie Canal corridor is crossed by three overpasses
occurring at Kendrick Road, Route 15 (West Henrietta Road) and Route 15A (East Henrietta
Road). At the overpasses, the canal has limited visibility from vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
Currently along the length of the canal within the project limits, there are multiple bridge crossings
(vehicular and utility) and highway exits and entrances. The bridge crossings are all similar, flat
steel beam structures with concrete decks and steel railing, characteristic of typical DOT-style
infrastructure. They do not contribute to the historic setting of the canal. Within the eastern part of
the project corridor (east of West Henrietta Road) the canal widens and is heavily vegetated along
the banks, giving it a more naturalistic look and feel (less historic). West of West Henrietta Road,
the canal is narrower and defined by metal sheet-pile and concrete walls. West of Kendrick Road,
the canal retains its historic character beginning with the canal guard gate and extending to its
junction with the Genesee River where there are railroad bridges and two historic footbridges
crossing the canal in Genesee Valley Park. The visual environment therefore already contains
dominant vehicular /transportation corridor elements ranging from historic to modern within this
landscape district.

Landscape District II - Residential:
Landscape District II consists of single-family residential properties (0.2± AC lots) of one to two-
story houses with attached or detached garages, to the north of the I-390 / Erie Canal corridor
between Kendrick Road and Route 15 (West Henrietta Road). The rear property lines of these
properties are the northern boundary of the Erie Canal corridor. These properties sit higher than
the canal on top of a steep heavily vegetated slope, shielding the view of the I-390 / Erie Canal
corridor in the summer months and creating a filtered view of the corridor in the winter months.

Landscape District III – Commercial & Institutional:
Landscape District III consists of commercial, office and institutional land uses. The commercial
areas consist of 1 to 5 story buildings located to the north and south of the I-390 corridor on
Route15 (West Henrietta Road) and Route 15A (East Henrietta Road). To the south of the
corridor, the office and institutional land uses consist of modern one to four-story buildings with
minimal landscaping for buffering vegetation surrounding them. To the north, a majority of the
commercial, office, institutional and residential land uses are shielded by heavy vegetation along
the embankments of the Erie Canal. The ornate architecture of the upper portion of the historic
Monroe County Hospital building is visible above the treetops on the north side of the I-390
corridor, along with the smokestack from the former county Iola complex to its east. These
structures are historic and serve as landmarks within the corridor. The Erie Canal runs parallel to
I-390 through this corridor and remains mostly un-viewable from I-390 except for the portion that is
visible to westbound motorists only, between Kendrick Road and Route 15 (West Henrietta Road).

Page 8

Visual Impact Assessment

6. Viewshed and Key Viewpoints

In conjunction with the NYSDOT, six (6) key viewpoints were selected that represent the views which
are most likely to be affected by the project and which would have the most significant impact upon
the viewer groups and the visual environment. These locations were photographed and post-
construction photo simulations were developed to illustrate the potential changes to area visual
resources that would result from the constructed project. The locations and directions of these
photographs are shown on the Viewpoint Location Map (Figure 2). The existing photographs and
proposed photo simulations are shown in Figures 4 through 15. The photo simulations were used to
aid in the analysis of the project alternative.

7. Viewer Groups

To predict viewer responses to changes in the visual environment, it is important to identify the viewer
groups who will be seeing the project. When assessing the viewer groups, four (4) factors become
important: viewer exposure; viewer sensitivity; viewer activity; and viewer awareness. Each one of
these factors influences how a viewer group will respond to changes. Within the I-390 project
corridor, viewers can be categorized into three groups: commuters/shoppers, Erie Canal / Canalway
Trail users (boaters, pedestrians and bicyclists) and residents.

Motorists
Motorists comprise the largest viewer group within the project area. Motorists view the project
from the road, and typically in a more dynamic mode (i.e., continual movement, higher traveling
speeds, and short duration). This motorist viewer group consists of repeat motorists; new
motorists; and traversing motorists. Repeat motorists travel within or through the corridor daily or
more frequently for goods and services as well as employment opportunities. Although they utilize
the route for quick access to and from the trip origin and destination, over time they have a
prolonged duration of view of their surroundings. Repeat motorists are more likely to respond to
changes in the viewshed as visual features are used as reference and landmarks for orientation
and navigation. Speed on this corridor is both high for the I-390 travelers, and low on the adjacent
access roads. Repeat motorists tend to be destination oriented and focused on traffic patterns.
Viewer exposure is high due to the number of highway travelers and trips and sensitivity can be
high due to increased view duration.

Erie Canal Users
The recreational use of the Erie Canal and the Canalway Trail includes boaters, bicyclists and
pedestrians. Users of the canal would be traveling at slower, more leisurely speeds creating a
higher viewer exposure.

Residents
Residents comprise a small but important viewer group within the project area. Residents are
made up of home-owners, college students/renters and long and short-term hospital patients.
Homeowners in and around the project area have a more static, prolonged, detail-focused view of
the road and local surroundings; therefore, viewer exposure and viewer sensitivity is high. College
students/renters also have a more static, prolonged, detail-focused view of the road and local
surroundings, but their exposure to the project area is lessened by the fact that they are temporary
residents making the viewer sensitivity less. Hospital patients have a shorter exposure time to the
project area making their viewer exposure and sensitivity minimal.

Page 9

Visual Impact Assessment

Local Business People/Hotel Guests
Employees of the adjacent local business, as well as hotel guest who can view the project area
from their place of work or stay comprise this viewer group. They, like the residents, have a more
static, prolonged detail focus of the project area and visual environment, however they are likely to
feel less ownership than residents. Their viewer exposure and sensitivity is moderate to low
compared to residents.

8. Assessment of Impacts

Impacts to Landscape District I – I-390 & Erie Canal Corridor - (Viewpoints 7, 19, 21, & 22);

Viewpoint 7 (Figures 4 and 5) was taken from the Corporate Woods Office Park looking northeast
at the proposed I-390 / East Henrietta Road off-ramp and the repositioned on-ramp. The new and
repositioned ramps will not significantly impact the visual character of the corridor. The increase
in the amount of pavement and open space will result in the loss of minimal shrub and small tree
plant material. Even with these changes, the character of the corridor will stay the same. That,
combined with the high travel speeds on I-390, will create no visual impacts.

Viewpoint 19 (Figures 6 and 7) was taken from the Kendrick Road overpass looking southeast.
This view will change based on the repositioning of the East River Road on and off ramps. The
shifting of the ramps will result in the removal of a significant patch of mature vegetation in
between I-390 and East River Road, opening up the views to and from buildings along East River
Road. For repeat motorists and residents, there will be a measurable impact due to the removal
of the patch of mature vegetation, which may function as a landmark or reference in the landscape.
The patch of vegetation creates a contrasting setting within this otherwise open, largely non-
vegetated stretch of corridor. The vegetation removal will reduce the visual variety of the corridor
and result in further homogenization of the visual character of the corridor.

There may be minor impacts to the other viewer groups that are more sensitive to visual quality of
the corridor as the removal of the vegetation decreases the contrast and variety of the landscape
within the project area.

Viewpoint 21 (Figures 8 and 9) was taken from the West Henrietta – I-390 North on-ramp looking
northwest. This viewpoint shows the proposed 6.5' to 8.5’ height noise wall along the back edge
of the residential properties on Westmoreland Drive. The addition of the noise wall will not
significantly change the view from the I-390-on-ramp. In spring, summer and fall, the wall will be
shielded by dense vegetation. In the winter months, the vegetation will offer filtered views for the
new noise wall. That, combined with speeds on I-390 and the quick flow of traffic thru this area
will create little to no visual impacts from any viewer group.

Viewpoint 22 (Figures 10 and 11) was taken from the Kendrick Road overpass looking northwest.
The introduction of the new I-390 south on-ramp will obscure, to varying degrees, the view of the
canal, which is depressed in the landscape, from I-390 for a short distance. Due to high travel
speeds, the visual impact to motorists from I-390 would be minimal. For pedestrians and
motorists on Kendrick Road, these will be minor to moderate visual impacts. Kendrick Road
bridge will no longer be a continuous structure/corridor over the canal and the expressway. The
bridge will be interrupted with the new I-390 northbound on-ramp, increasing the dominance of
Kendrick Road and the built environment in general with the pier-supported elevated ramp
adjacent to the canal. The Lehigh Valley Trail-West Branch, which currently runs along the west
side of Kendrick Road, will be impacted with this new vehicle access to I-390.

Page 10

Visual Impact Assessment

The most impact will be experienced from the Erie Canal and trail users. The new I-390
northbound on-ramp will introduce additional structure in an area already dominated by the I-390
corridor, concrete canal walls, the canal guard gate and lock, and the Kendrick Road overpass. In
addition, the new on-ramp will add additional vertical edge to the south side of the canal, creating
a narrower corridor that interferes with views to the south. The visual quality impacts to the Erie
Canal and trail users are moderate to significant for this section of the project area.
Impacts to Landscape District II – Residential – (Viewpoint 20);
Viewpoint 20 (Figures 12 and 13) was taken from the Westmoreland Drive / Castleman Road
intersection looking southeast. This view shows the proposed noise wall along the back property
line of the residence on Westmoreland Drive. The Erie Canal and I-390 are behind this wall
depressed into the landscape at the bottom of a steep highly vegetated slope. In the spring,
summer and fall months, the wall will be shielded by dense vegetation. In the winter months, the
dormant vegetation will created a filtered view of the wall. The visual impact of the wall will be
minimal for those within the corridor.
Impacts to Landscape District III – Commercial and Institutional - (Viewpoint 2);
Viewpoint 2 (Figures 14 and 15) shows the potential visual impacts from the Monroe County
Health Department building entrance. The new on-ramp will require the taking of a portion of the
existing parking lot and the removal of vegetation that currently buffers the West Henrietta bridge
and I-390 from view. The proposed on-ramp will eliminate existing vegetation and introduce
concrete barrier walls, which will create a hardscaped edge to the parking lot. The new on-ramp
may also open views to West Henrietta Road with partial removal of the dense vegetation on the
north side of the canal. The visual changes to this area will be significant; however, the visual
impact will be minimal to moderate with a slight decrease in visual quality based on the existing
land use and affected viewer group(s).

Page 11

FIGURE 4 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Northeast From Corporate
at Route 15A and Route15 Woods Office Park
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-7- Existing

FIGURE 5 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Northeast From Corporate
at Route 15A and Route15 Woods Office Park
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-7- Proposed

FIGURE 6 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Southeast From Kendrick
at Route 15A and Route15 Road Overpass
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-19 - Existing

FIGURE 7 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Southeast From Kendrick
at Route 15A and Route15 Road Overpass
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-19 - Proposed

FIGURE 8 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Northwest From West
at Route 15A and Route15 Henrietta - I-390 North On-ramp
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-21 - Existing

FIGURE 9 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Northwest From West
at Route 15A and Route15 Henrietta - I-390 North On-ramp
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-21 - Proposed

FIGURE 10 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Northwest From
at Route 15A and Route15 Kendrick Road Overpass
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-22 - Existing

FIGURE 11 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Northwest From
at Route 15A and Route15 Kendrick Road Overpass
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-22 - Proposed

FIGURE 12 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Southeast From Westmoreland

at Route 15A and Route15 Drive / Castleman Road Intersection

Visual Impact Assessment Photosims - VP-20 - Existing

FIGURE 13 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Southeast From Westmoreland

at Route 15A and Route15 Drive / Castleman Road Intersection

Visual Impact Assessment Photosims - VP-20 - Proposed

FIGURE 14 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Soutwest From Monroe
at Route 15A and Route15 County Health Department
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-2 - Existing

FIGURE 15 I-390 Interchange Improvements Looking Soutwest From Monroe
at Route 15A and Route15 County Health Department
Visual Impact Assessment
Photosims - VP-2 - Proposed