Participant Pre tx Time post
WAB AQ onset CVA
(months)
Well define categories (Kiran & Johnson, sub
P1 82.5 11
P2 84.3 7
P3 87.3 36
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
t Category Generalization trends
A Trained
) Atypical => Typical
bmitted) Typical ≠› Atypical
1. Shapes
Atypical => Typical
1. Shapes
1. Shapes
Kiran & Johnson (2008)
Participant Pre tx Time post
WAB AQ onset CVA
(months)
Well define categories (Kiran & Johnson, sub
P1 82.5 11
P2 84.3 7
P3 87.3 36
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
t Category Generalization trends
A Trained
) Atypical => Typical
bmitted) Typical ≠› Atypical
1. Shapes
Atypical => Typical
1. Shapes
1. Shapes
Kiran & Johnson (2008)
Ad hoc ca
Camera Bicycle
Cup
C
Things at garage sale
Jewelry Lamp Mugs
Candle
Chairs Pillow
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
ategories
Pens • Entertainment
• Items for travel
Clock • Household
Antique
items
w • Memorabilia
• Unwanted/not
needed
• For kids
• Things with
newer formats
• Things that get
replaced
• Things for
reading
Dependent variable in baseline
Generative naming of category
“Please name as many items th
sale”
Typical items (N =15)
Atypical items (N =15)
Normed for variables
Classification of r
subcategories (N
kitchen items, ho
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
e and treatment probes:
items
hat you could have in a garage
Other items in the category that
were generated by participant
Not normed
responses into
N = 10) (e.g.,
ome/garden)
Generative nam ing of target atypical w ords for categ
garage sale
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
P r obe s
Total generative naming of other w ords for category garage sale
100
Number of target + acceptable 90
responses
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 45 6 78 9
Pr obe s
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
gory
Typical- unt r ained
At ypical- t rained
Things to have at
garage sale
11 12 Typical Atypical
Pants Antiques,
Jewelry Camera
Clock Movies
Candle
10 11
Summary: Tre
Particip Age Pre tx Time post
ant WAB AQ onset CVA
(months)
P1 76 79 30 1.
P2 39 82 6 1.
2.
P3 76 84.3 108 1.
P4 69 72.1 10 1.
2.
P5 84 70.9 9 1.
P6 64 84.8 96 1.
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA tx criterion of
* Did not achieveRESEARCH LABORATORY
eatment effects
Category Trained Generalization trends
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping Atypical => Typical
. Things at garage sale Typical => Atypical
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping * Typical ≠› Atypical
. Things at garage sale * Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping * Typical ≠› Atypical
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
80% accuracy across 2 sessions
Summary: Tre
Particip Age Pre tx Time post
ant WAB AQ onset CVA
(months)
P1 76 79 30 1.
P2 39 82 6 1.
2.
P3 76 84.3 108 1.
P4 69 72.1 10 1.
2.
P5 84 70.9 9 1.
P6 64 84.8 96 1.
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA tx criterion of
* Did not achieveRESEARCH LABORATORY
eatment effects
Category Trained Generalization trends
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping Atypical => Typical
. Things at garage sale Typical => Atypical
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping * Typical ≠› Atypical
. Things at garage sale
* Atypical =>
Typical
Things to take camping * Typical ≠› Atypical
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
80% accuracy across 2 sessions
Summary: Tre
Particip Age Pre tx Time post
ant WAB AQ onset CVA
(months)
P1 76 79 30 1.
P2 39 82 6 1.
2.
P3 76 84.3 108 1.
P4 69 72.1 10 1.
2.
P5 84 70.9 9 1.
P6 64 84.8 96 1.
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA tx criterion of
* Did not achieveRESEARCH LABORATORY
eatment effects
Category Trained Generalization trends
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping Atypical => Typical
. Things at garage sale Typical => Atypical
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping * Typical ≠› Atypical
. Things at garage sale * Atypical => Typical
Things to take camping * Typical ≠› Atypical
. Things at garage sale Atypical => Typical
80% accuracy across 2 sessions
Number of observations Summary of tre
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Training typical examples
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
eatment studies
Generalization
No generalization
Training atypical examples
Theoretical A
CHURC
Hymn
Parish
Candle
Minister
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA Kiran, S
RESEARCH LABORATORY
Assumption
CH Concrete words
Steeple
Bible
Sandberg, & Abbott, in press
Theoretical A
CHURC
Parish Hymn
Candle Holy
Blessing
Solace
Minister
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA Kiran, S
RESEARCH LABORATORY
Assumption
CH Concrete words
y Steeple Abstract words
Penance
Bible
Prayer
Sandberg, & Abbott, in press
Hypothesis an
Parish Hymn
Candle Prayer Steeple
Minister Bible
TRAINING ABSTRACT WORDS
UNTRAINED CONCRETE WORDS
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA Kiran, S
RESEARCH LABORATORY
nd Predictions
Blessing Angel
Solace Candle Belief
Forgiveness Penance
TRAINING CONCRETE WORDS
UNTRAINED ABSTRACT WORDS
Sandberg, & Abbott, in press
Treatment
Sorting word cards by related location
Select target word (N = 10)
Select 6 written semantic features
from distracters for each target
Ca
Respond to 15 auditorily as
presented questions with
(5 accurate, 5 inaccurate, 5 distracter)
Word recall of trained items W
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA Kiran, S
RESEARCH LABORATORY
t Protocol
Church, Courthouse and Hospital
Minister
Is alive Has a physical presence
Can be seen Conveys important messages
an be touched
Exists outside the mind
Is it Is it a place to Does it live in
ssociated pray? trees?
h heaven?
What are we talking about? Minister
Sandberg, & Abbott, in press
Number of items Generative naming for target abstract and concrete
HOSPITAL
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Probe num ber
Generative naming for target abstract and concrete
Abstract-untrained
COURTHOUSE
10 Concrete-trained
9
8
Number of items 7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA Probe num be r
RESEARCH LABORATORY
e words P3
Abstract-trained
Concrete-untrained
HOSPITAL
• Trained abstract ES = *
• Untrained concrete ES = 4.2
13 14 15
e words
COURTHOUSE
• Trained concrete ES = 6.89
• Untrained abstract ES = 2.3
13 14 15
Kiran Sandberg & Abbott in press
Summary
Ps Category Typicality Gen
trained trained patt
P1 1. Church Abstract Abs
2. Hospital Concrete Con
P2 1. Church Abstract Abs
2. No treatment
P3 1. Hospital Abstract Abs
2. Courthouse Concrete Con
P4 1. Church Concrete Con
2. Hospital Abstract
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
of results
neralization No learning,
terns observed no generalization
stract ≠› Concrete
No learning,
ncrete ≠› Abstract no generalization
stract => Concrete Generalization
stract => Concrete Generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No generalization
Summary
Ps Category trained Typicality Gen
trained obse
P1 1. Church Abstract Abs
2. Hospital Concrete Con
P2 1. Church Abstract Abs
2. No treatment
P3 1. Hospital Abstract Abs
2. Courthouse Concrete Con
P4 1. Church Concrete Con
2. Hospital Abstract Abs
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
of results
neralization patterns
erved
stract ≠› Concrete No learning,
no generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No learning,
no generalization
stract => Concrete Generalization
stract => Concrete Generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No generalization
stract => concrete Generalization
Summary
Ps Category trained Typicality Gen
trained obse
P1 1. Church Abstract Abs
2. Hospital Concrete Con
P2 1. Church Abstract Abs
2. No treatment
P3 1. Hospital Abstract Abs
2. Courthouse Concrete Con
P4 1. Church Concrete Con
2. Hospital Abstract
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
of results
neralization patterns No learning,
erved no generalization
stract ≠› Concrete
No learning,
ncrete ≠› Abstract no generalization
stract => Concrete Generalization
stract => Concrete Generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No generalization
ncrete ≠› Abstract No generalization
A: Normal category representation Typic
examp
Semantic Robin
representation Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies
Phonological ROBIN SPAR
representation
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
KirRaEnSEA(2RC0H0L7A)BOARJASTOLRPY
cal Atypical
ples examples
Sparrow Penguin Ostrich
Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies Webbed feet, eats fish Long neck, long legs
RROW PENGUIN OSTRICH
A: Normal category representation Typic
examp
Semantic Robin
representation Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies
Phonological ROBIN SPAR
representation
Robin S
B: Effect of treatment Lay eggs, has beak L
Small, hops, flies S
Training Atypical
Examples
ROBIN SP
Kiran (B2OS0T0O7N)UANIJVSERLSIPTY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
cal Atypical
ples examples
Sparrow Penguin Ostrich
Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies Webbed feet, eats fish Long neck, long legs
RROW PENGUIN OSTRICH
Sparrow Penguin Ostrich
Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies Webbed feet, eats fish Long neck, long legs
PARROW PENGUIN OSTRICH
A: Normal category representation Typic
examp
Semantic Robin
representation Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies
Phonological ROBIN SPAR
representation
Robin S
B: Effect of treatment Lay eggs, has beak L
Small, hops, flies S
Training Atypical
Examples
ROBIN SP
C: Effect of treatment Robin
Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies
Training Typical
Examples
ROBIN SP
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
KirRaEnSEA(2RC0H0L7A)BOARJASTOLRPY
cal Atypical
ples examples
Sparrow Penguin Ostrich
Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies Webbed feet, eats fish Long neck, long legs
RROW PENGUIN OSTRICH
Sparrow Penguin Ostrich
Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies Webbed feet, eats fish Long neck, long legs
PARROW PENGUIN OSTRICH
Sparrow Penguin Ostrich
Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak Lay eggs, has beak
Small, hops, flies Webbed feet, eats fish Long neck, long legs
PARROW PENGUIN OSTRICH
• Training atypical example
than typical examples to
generalization
• Patients also show consis
language measures
• Are behavioral changes a
changes in the brain?
• What are regions that can
language recovery after t
BOSTON UNIVERSITY APHASIA
RESEARCH LABORATORY
es may be more efficient
facilitate within category
stent improvements on
associated with functional
n support behavioral
treatment?