The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

Challenging the myth of the rural idyll Ruth Bradshaw Thematic Studies Manager Commission for Rural Communities

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by , 2017-03-06 20:40:03

Challenging the myth of the rural idyll

Challenging the myth of the rural idyll Ruth Bradshaw Thematic Studies Manager Commission for Rural Communities

Challenging the my

Ruth Bra
Thematic Stud
Commission for R

yth of the rural idyll

adshaw
dies Manager
Rural Communities

Commiss
Com

• Established Apr
division of Coun

• Independent org
October 2006

• We have three m

– Rural Advocate
– Expert Adviser
– Independent W

sion for Rural
mmunities

ril 2005 (as operating
ntryside Agency)
ganisation since

main roles:

e

Watchdog





Backgroun

• Part of the CRC
• Need for some h

attitudes to disa
• BMRB commiss

cluster analysis
• 20 minute face-t

1,010 people liv

nd to the survey

C’s Disadvantage Study
hard facts about rural
advantage
sioned to undertake

to-face interviews with
ving in 89 rural areas

The qu

• Designed by BM
CRC, Defra and

• Open questions
and awareness

• Attitude stateme
responses

• Issues covered
spirit, social cap
rural idyll

uestionnaire

MRB in consultation with
d an advisory group
s to gauge recognition

of disadvantage
ents with common

included community
pital, self sufficiency,

Main proble

Public transport
Lack of shops/banks/PO
Lack of leisure facilities for adults

High property prices
Lack of leisure fac. for teenagers

Lack of leisure fac. for children
Dependency on car
Few jobs/ Unemp.
Traffic through area
Lack of policing

ems in local area

43%

17%

11%

11%

11%

10%

9%

7% Other problems
7% mentioned by 3% or
4% fewer respondents

Agreemen
specific types

Difficulty finding affordable housin
Lack of public transpor

Difficulty finding a well paid jo
Som e people around here are lonel

Lack of shop
Some people experience pov ert

Racial prejudic

nt that there are
s of disadvantage

g 78%
rt 65%
b 63%
ly 50%
ps 49%
ty 37%
ce 26%

Community

Strong community 38%
spirit

Need to fit in 27%

Mind their own 11% 11% 14%
business

0% 25%
Agree a lot Agree a little

spirit statements

30% 12% 11% 7%
32% 12% 18% 10%

26% 38%
50% 75% 100%
e Neutral Disagree a little Disagree a lot

Social cont
outside th

How often do you … Most 1-2 tim
days wee

Speak to 55%
neighbours

Meet up with 22%
relatives not
living with you

Meet up with 30%
friends

tact with people
he household

mes a 1-2 times Less Never
ek a month often
4%

32% 7% 2%

38% 19% 20% 2%

43% 18% 6% 3%

Characteris

• Less likely to feel p
• Most likely to agree

embarrassing to as
• Less likely to be w

overall)
• More likely to be o

earning less than £
• More likely to be in

14%)
• Less likely to vote

activities

stics of cluster 1

part of the community
e that it would be
sk for help (64% vs. 30%)
working full-time (28% vs.35%

on a low income (37%
£25,000)
n social housing (17% vs.

or get involved in local

Characteris

• Most likely to recog
problems

• Disagree that ever
opportunity (73% v

• Disagree that there
vs. 40%)

• 18% have moved t
years (compared to

• Large proportion o
families

stics of cluster 2

gnise the existence of social

ryone has the same
vs. 29% overall)
e is no disadvantage (73%

to area within the last 3
o 14% on average)
of women (60%) and

Characteris

• Most likely to agree
around here’ – 64%

• 68% ‘feel part of th
overall

• 71% agree welfare
each other vs. 43%

• Strongly believe ev
opportunities – 77%

• 34% aged over 65
• 58% living comfort

46% overall

stics of cluster 3

e ‘there is no disadvantage
% vs. 42% overall
he local community’ vs. 49%

e state stops people helping
% overall
veryone has the same
% vs. 56%
5 vs. 20% overall
tably on present income vs.

Characteris

• Same views on rur
• BUT a more sympa

welfare state
• Strongly disagree t

80% vs. 28% overa
• Disagree that welfa

helping each other
• Least likely to agre

find money for bas
• 23% under 29 and

stics of cluster 4

ral idyll as cluster 3
athetic attitude to the

that people need to fit in –
all
are state stops people
r – 55% vs. 36% overall
ee that some people cannot
sics – 29% vs. 37% overall
d 44% earn £25,000+

The differen
cl

There is no dis

C4 39 19

C3 64

C2 14 12

C1 47
0%
20% 40%

nce between the
lusters

sadvantage around here

9 39

10 24 Agree
73 Neutral
Disagree

22 28

60% 80% 100%

Overview

• C1 – isolated an
(27%)

• C2 – recognise
• C3 – hold traditi

in the rural idyll
• C4 – believe in t

softer views on

of the clusters

nd lack of social contact

disadvantage (24%)
ional views and believe
(29%)
the rural idyll but hold
welfare (19%)

Prioritie

es for action

Further

For the full surve
other Disadvant

:// .
/

.@
020 7932 5894

r information

ey report and all the
tage Study outputs:

. . //
/

..


Click to View FlipBook Version