Using CBM G
Accountabilit
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
07-08 Sc
Number of Students Who Meet
Reading CBM Benchmarks
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Graphs for Program
ty
Special Education
ELL
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
chool Year
Another Way to be
Alterable
Moving the focus from
alterable variables a
information about t
someth
Ken Howell
e Planful: Focus on
Variables
m unalterable variables to
allows educators to get
things that they can do
hing about
“Unalterable
“Unalterable” varia
– Those which educa
reasonably expecte
– Sometimes called
do not have a direc
on the quality of les
– Poor predictors of
Unalterable doesn’
unimportant
e” variables:
ables
ators cannot be
ed to change
“Distal Variables” as they
ct and immediate impact
ssons
individual student learning
’t automatically mean
“Alterable”
“Alterable” variable
– Educators can reas
change these throu
of instruction
– Sometimes called
are close to the lea
shown to directly a
quality of learning
– Alterable variables
individual student l
” variables:
es
sonably be expected to
ugh, or during, the process
“Proximal Variables” as they
arning event and have been
and immediately affect the
s are the best predictors of
learning
Changing our eva
unalterab
t
alterable
will result in us g
about things w
someth
aluative focus from
ble variables
to
variables
getting information
we can actually do
hing about
Variables Related to S
Within Student
Alterable Desire to learn
Strategies for learning
Knowledge
Skills
Prior content knowledge
Self-efficacy/helplessness
Unalterable Race
(Hard to Genetic potential
Change) Gender/sex
Birth order
Disposition
Health
Physical differences
IQ
Disability category
Personal history
Student Achievement
t External to Student
Quality of curriculum
Quality of instruction
Pedagogical knowledge
Content knowledge
Quality of evaluation
s Quality of learning environment
Quality of time/content
Family income and resources
Family housing
Parent years of schooling
Mobility
Members of family
Family values
Peer socioeconomic status
Family history
CBM &
Time
Learner
Behavior
Level
Content
Material
Criteria
& IEPs
IEP Goals & O
Time (The amount of time the goa
– “In 30 weeks…”
Learner (The student for whom th
– “..Jose will…”
Behavior (The specific skill the stu
– “…read aloud…”
Level (The grade the content is fro
– “…2nd grade…”
Content (What the student is learn
– “…reading…”
Material (What the student is usin
– “…passages from ORF CBM p
Criteria (The expected level of per
– “..90 words correctly in one mi
Objectives
al is written for)
he goal is written)
udent will demonstrate)
om)
ning about)
ng)
progress monitoring material…”
rformance including time and accuracy)
inute with greater than 95% accuracy”
Goals and O
Writing goals an
same principles
written for 1 year
shorter time fram
Objectives
nd objectives use the
but goals are typically
r and objectives are on a
me.
Reading Go
ORF Goal
• In one year, Ed
passage from O
material at 90 w
greater than 95
Mazes Goal
• In 30 weeks, De
words on a 4th
CBM progress m
correct in 3 min
accuracy.
oals
dgar will read aloud a 2nd grade
ORF CBM progress monitoring
words correctly in 1 minute with
5% accuracy.
evin will correctly restore missing
grade maze passage from Maze
monitoring material at 20 words
nutes with greater than 95%
Reading Ob
ORF Objective
• In 10 weeks, Edga
passage from OR
material at 50 wor
greater than 95%
Maze Objective
• In 10 weeks, Devin
words on a 4th gra
CBM progress mo
correct in 3 minute
accuracy.
bjectives
ar will read aloud a 2nd grade
CBM progress monitoring
ds correctly in 1 minute, with
accuracy.
n will correctly restore missing
ade maze passage from Maze
onitoring material at 8 words
es, with greater than 95%
Additional R
RIPM Leadershi
– www.progressm
Products, then C
Resources
ip Team Content Module
monitoring.net. Click on RIPM
Content Modules
National Ce
Progress Mo
www.stud
(866) 770
Email: stude
enter on Student
onitoring
dentprogress.org
0-6111 (Toll-Free)
[email protected]