The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.
Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by Abhishek Dixit, 2024-02-07 02:48:29

search logic games wumpus

search logic games wumpus

51 101 Forward chaining example Query = Q (i.e. “Is Q true?”) # premises 102 Forward chaining example A is known to be true Decrement count


52 103 Forward chaining example B is also known to be true count = 0; therefore, L is true 104 Forward chaining example count = 0; therefore, M is true


53 105 Forward chaining example count = 0; therefore, P is true 106 Forward chaining example count = 0; therefore, Q is true Query = Q (i.e. “Is Q true?”)


54 107 Backward chaining Backward chaining Idea: work backwards from the query q to prove q: check if q is known already, OR prove by backward chaining all premises of some rule concluding q Avoid loops: check if new subgoal is already on goal stack Avoid repeated work: check if new subgoal 1. has already been proved true, or 2. has already failed 108 Backward chaining example


55 109 Backward chaining example 110 Backward chaining example


56 111 Backward chaining example 112 Backward chaining example


57 113 Backward chaining example 114 Backward chaining example


58 115 Backward chaining example 116 Backward chaining example


59 117 Forward vs. backward chaining Forward vs. backward chaining FC is data-driven, automatic, unconscious processing e.g., object recognition, routine decisions FC may do lots of work that is irrelevant to the goal BC is goal-driven, appropriate for problem-solving e.g., How do I get an A in this class? e.g., What is my best exit strategy out of the classroom? e.g., How can I impress my date tonight? Complexity of BC can be much less than linear in size of KB Next Class: More logic & Uncertainty Note: No homework this week, HW #2 will be assigned next week


Click to View FlipBook Version