Buku Panduan on NHPEO

I. PENDAHULUAN

A. Latar Belakang

Kemampuan dan penguasaan bahasa asing, dalam hal ini Bahasa Inggris,
merupakan salah satu kebutuhan sekaligus menjadi penunjang dalam menghadapi
tingkat persaingan sumber daya manusia (SDM) di pasar kerja nasional dan
internasional. Untuk mencapai peningkatan kemampuan dan penguasaan tersebut
diperlukan suatu pembinaan kompetensi mahasiswa yang dilakukan secara
berkelanjutan. Salah satu upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk meningkatkan kempetensi
mahasiswa tersebut dapat dilakukan melaui suatu ajang kompetisi. Dari ajang kompetisi
ini diharapakan dapat meningkatkan motivasi, knowledge, hard skill, serta soft skill
yang diharapakan. Seiring dengan program “Kebisasaan Baru” pada masa pandemic
Covid 19, kegiatan kompetisi sudah selaykanya dilaksanakan dengan tetap
melakasanakan protocol kesehatan.

Oleh karena itu, Politeknik Kesehatan se-Indonesia yang berada dibawah naungan
Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia berupaya untuk senantiasa meningkatkan
kemampuan tersebut melaui ajang kompetisi Bahasa Inggris taun 2021 secara daring,
yang dinamai Online National Health Polytechnic English Olympics (ONHPEO) 2021.
Kegiatan NHPEO 2021 ini merupakan kegiatan kompetisi daring pertama yang akan
diselenggarakan di Poltekkes Kemenkes Makassar pada…………………...

Guna memberikan arahan lomba dan aturan maka disusunlah buku Panduan
ONHPEO pertama ini. Buku Panduan ini berisikan tentang aturan lomba Debat dengan
sistem British Parliamentary (BP), aturan lomba Non Debat, yakni Newscasting, Story
Telling, dan Speech, dan mekanisme pelaksanaan kompetisi secara daring. Aturan dan
sistem lomba di dalam panduan ONHPEO ini diharapkan dapat mencerminkan ciri khas
dari kompetisi yang dilaksanakan oleh Politeknik Kesehatan, yaitu aturan dan sistem
lomba yang dibuat merupakan hasil pemikiran dan diskusi bersama, sesuai dengan
kompetensi mahasiswa yang ingin dikembangkan.

B. Tujuan

2

1. Mempererat persatuan dan kesatuan Republik Indonesia, dan membangun kebersamaan
dan kekeluargaan antar Politeknik Kesehatan se-Indonesia.

2. Menumbuhkan minat dalam bahasa asing khususnya bahasa Inggris, jiwa sportivitias,
berpikir kritis dan nilai daya saing mahasiswa/ lulusan Politeknik Kesehatan dalam
memasuki dunia kerja.

3. Mengembangkan prestasi mahasiswa di Politeknik Kesehatan se-Indonesia.

C. Target Peserta

Peserta ONHPEO 2021 adalah semua mahasiswa Diploma III dan atau Diploma IV
(Sarjana Terapan) Politeknik Kesehatan se-Indonesia yang berstatus aktif pada
Pangkalan Data Perguruan Tinggi (PDPT) Kemenristekdikti.

II. JENIS-JENIS LOMBA
Jenis lomba yang dipertandingkan di ONPEO 2021 adalah sebagai berikut:
A. Lomba debat bahasa Inggris
B. Lomba Non Debat yang terdiri atas:
1. Public Speaking
2. Storytelling
3. Poster
4. Essay Writing
5. Vlog

III. SISTEM DAN MEKANISME PERLOMBAAN
A. Sistem Lomba Debat Bahasa Inggris

1. Pengertian
a. Debater adalah 2 (dua) orang peserta yang mengikuti perlombaan.
b. Tournament Director adalah orang yang mengaturnya jalannya perlombaan.

3

c. Chief Adjudicator adalah ketua juri yang mengatur mekanisme penjurian.
d. Deputy Chief Adjudicator adalah wakil ketua juri yang ikut membantu tugas ketua juri

dalam penjurian.
e. N1 Adjudicator adalah calon juri yang dikirim oleh tim, untuk diikutkan dalam

akreditasi.
f. Invited Adjudicator adalah juri yang diundang oleh panitia penyelenggara ONHPEO.
a. Tabulator adalah orang yang bertanggungjawab terhadap tabulasi penilaian dalam

perlombaan.

2. Sistem Lomba

Sistem lomba debat yang digunakan dalam ONHPEO 2021 adalah system
BritishParliamentary (BP). Sistem ini adalah sistem yang digunakan dalam National
Universities Debating Championship (NUDC) dan World University Debating
Championship (WUDC). Dalam ONHPEO 2021, terdapat dua kategori lomba, yaitu Open
Category dan Novice Category. Babak-babak dalam NHPEO adalah sebagai berikut:
a. Preliminary Rounds. Ini merupakan babak penyisihan. Terdapat 3 (tiga)
kali babak penyisihan, artinya semua tim akan melalui tiga kali debat. 16 tim
terbaik hasil dari penyisihan ini akan masuk dalam kategori Open Category dan akan
mengikuti babak eliminasi.
b. Tim urutan 17 – 24 setelah tiga babak penyisihan akan masuk dalam Novice Category
dan akan mengikuti babak Semifinal kategori Novice.
c. Quarterfinal Rounds Open category. Babak ini mempertemuka 16 tim terbaik hasil dari
babak-babak penyisihan.
d. Semifinal Rounds kategori Open Category. Babak ini mempertemukan 8 tim terbaik
hasil dari Quaterfinal Rounds

e. Grand Final Round. Terdapat dua babak Grand final yaitu Geand Final Open Category
dan Grand Final Novice Category.
3. Topik (motions) debat

a. Dewan juri membuat motion

4

b. Motion dalam NHPEO mencerminkan permasalahan dalam skala nasional dan
internasional

c. Motion akan disampaikan ke semua peserta setidaknya 2 minggu sebelum
pelaksanaan NHPEO

4. Peserta
a. Debaters
i. Debaters adalah mahasiswa DIII dan atau DIV di Politeknik Kesehatan di
Indonesia.
ii. Setiap Politeknik Kesehatan hanya mengirim satu tim.
iii. Satu tim terdiri atas dua debaters.
iv. Tidak ada anggota cadangan dalam sistem ini.
b. Adjudicator
i. Setiap Politeknik Kesehatan wajib mengirimkan minimal 1 (satu) orang
adjudicator
ii. Adjudicator pada poin (i) adalah staf pengajar dan atau pegawai di lingkungan
Politeknik. Untuk adjudicator debat diutamakan yang pernah menjadi juri
lomba debat bahasa Inggris dalam tingkat regional atau nasional.
iii. Setiap adjudicator wajib mengikuti seminar on debating, dan adjudicating.

B. Sistem Lomba Non Debat Pidato
Sistem yang digunakan berdasarkan prinsip preliminary dan eliminasi. Sistem ini
memungkinkan peserta mengikuti penyisihan dan babak final. Berikut adalah babak-
babak dalam lomba Non Debat:

Lomba Preliminary 1 Preliminary 2 Final
Public Speaking Demonstrative Oratory Speech Public Address
Speaking
Storytelling Folktale Story of Success From Zero to Hero
Poster Poster - Poster Presentation
Writing Letter Writing Expository writing Persuasive writing

5

Vlog Vlog - Vlog presentation

1. Babak-babak dalam lomba non debat:
a. Masing-masing peserta mengoleksi skor dengan cara mengikuti dua babak preliminary.
Public Speaking mempunyai Demonstrative Speaking dan Oratory Speech. Storytelling
mempunyai Folktale dan Story of Success, dan Writing mempunyai Letter writing dan
expository writing
b. Babak penyisihan untuk lomba poster dan Vlog dilakukan dengan penialian terhadap
karya yang dikumpulka ke panitia.
c. Babak Final akan mempertemukan 10 peserta terbaik di Public Speaking,Storytelling,
dan writing. Para finalis di Public Speaking harus menyampaikan Public Address. Para
Finalis Storytelling harus menyampaikan story dengan tema From Zero to Hero. Para
finalis di Writing harus membuat tulisan persuasive writing.
d. Babak final poster dan vlog mempertemukan 10 peserta terbak dimasing-masing
kategori. Babak final ini berupa presentasi poster dan vlog yang telah dibuat.

2. Peserta

a. Lomba Public speaking, storytelling, dan writing bersifat individu
b. Lomba poster dan Vlog dapat bersifat individu maupun kelompok.
c. Setiap politeknik berhak mengirimkan maksimal dua peserta pada Public Speaking,

Storytelling, dan Writing.
d. Setiap politeknik berhak mengirimkan satu peserta (individu/kelompok) pada poster

dan Vlog
e. Peserta merupakan mahasiswa aktif di politeknik kesehatan

3. Deskripsi topik
a. Dewan juri membuat deskripsi untuk topik lomba Public speaking
b. Dewan juri membuat story feeder untuk lomba Storytelling
c. Dewan juri membuat deskripsi topic (writing prompts) untuk lomba writing.
d. Dewan juri menentukan topik/tema poster dan Vlog.
e. Topik diberikan ke peserta satu minggu menjelang pelaksanaan lomba

6

4. Penghargaan
Tiga peserta terbaik di babak Final masing-masing kategori lomba akan menjadi Juara
1, 2, dan 3, dan tiga lainnya akan menjadi juara harapan 1,2,dan 3.

C. MEKANISME KOMPETISI DARING
1. Prosedur lomba debat
a. Draw release
Draw adalah halaman yang menampilkan ruangan, posisi, dan juri peserta pada
ronde tersebut.
Pada halaman ini posisi debat peserta akan disingkat sebagai berikut:
- Opening Government: OG
- Opening Opposition : OO
- Closing Government : CG
- Closing Opposition : CO

Draw dapat dilihat secara mandiri di tabulasi. Tautan tabulasi akan dibagikan
melalui grup WhatsApp.
Ketika peserta telah mendapatkan ruangan di mana peserta dialokasikan, peserta
diwajibkan untuk segera masuk ke Zoom building peserta dengan cara menekan
nama ruangan peserta yang terdapat di laman "draw".

Seluruh peserta juga diwajibkan untuk segera mengganti display name ketika
sudah berada dalam Zoom meeting.

7

Peserta dapat mengganti display name peserta melalui kolom “Participants” >
tekan nama peserta > tekan “More” > “Rename”.

Aturan penamaan peserta adalah sebagai berikut:
[Ronde] [Ruangan] [Posisi] [Nama Lengkap sesuai tabulasi]
Contoh untuk debater:
R1 A.1 OG Annisa Ilmi
R3 B.4 CO Ahmad Hanif

Contoh untuk juri (baik Invited Adjudicator maupun N1 Adjudicator):
R2 A.1 Judge Andy Bayu
R5 C.5 Judge Hans Geovanni
Nama ini dipisahkan oleh spasi dan bukan tanda baca lain seperti koma, garis
bawah, dsb.
Contoh di bawah ini adalah salah:
R2_A.1_OG_Annisa Ilmi (salah karena menggunakan garis bawah)
R4-C.4-Judge-Andy Bayu (salah karena menggunakan tanda hubung)
B.4 CG Hans Geovanni (tidak mencantumkan ronde)

Peserta memiliki waktu 10 menit untuk masuk ke Zoom Building dan mengganti
display name peserta. Panitia/Tab Team berhak untuk mengontak peserta dengan
metode apapun untuk mencari peserta untuk masuk ke dalam Zoom Building.
Panitia/Tab Team tidak bertanggung jawab apabila partisipan tidak memiliki
akses informasi tertentu yang dibagikan dalam Zoom Building.

8

b. Motion Release dan Casebuilding
10 menit setelah Draw Release, Dewan juri inti akan melakukan Motion Release
di Zoom Building masing-masing. CAP akan melakukan share screen berisikan
mosi debat dan mengumumkan secara verbal. Di sini juga partisipan dapat
bertanya mengenai mosi pada ronde tersebut.
Mosi juga bisa diakses di laman tabulasi di bagian “Motions”.
Waktu case building adalah 15 menit dimulai dari waktu mosi dirilis.
Saat case building dimulai, breakout room akan dibuka sehingga seluruh
partisipan dapat mengakses breakout room. Semua peserta wajib untuk masuk ke
breakout room masing-masing sesegera mungkin dengan menekan join saat pop
up sebagai berikut muncul di Zoom peserta.

Apabila pop up ini muncul, atau secara tidak sengaja peserta menekan tombol
“Later”, maka peserta dapat masuk ke breakout room dengan menekan opsi ini di
kanan bawah Zoom peserta.

9

Peserta diperbolehkan untuk melakukan case building dengan teammate dengan
media komunikasi apapun. Namun peserta tidak diperbolehkan untuk
berkomunikasi dengan orang lain selain teammate, termasuk pelatih, dosen, juri
N1, dsb.

c. Debate
Pastikan bahwa peserta sudah ada di dalam breakout room untuk memulai debat.
Chair Adjudicator di ruangan peserta akan sekaligus menjadi chairperson yang
memandu jalannya perdebatan.

Sebelum peserta memulai speech peserta, pastikan bahwa semua orang di ruangan
peserta dapat mendengar peserta. Kalimat-kalimat seperti “am I audible?” dapat
membantu memastikan bahwa speech peserta dapat tersampaikan dengan baik.

Peserta dianjurkan untuk melakukan timing secara mandiri, namun Chair
Adjudicator di ruangan peserta akan melakukan timing juga dan akan
mengingatkan peserta di menit pertama, keenam, dan ketujuh.

Peserta diwajibkan untuk mematikan microphone peserta apabila bukan giliran
peserta untuk memberikan speech.

Untuk memberikan Point of Information (POI), peserta dapat melakukan opsi-opsi
berikut:
1. Mengangkat kertas bertuliskan “POI” dan menghadapkan kertas tersebut di depan
kamera
2. Menyalakan microphone peserta, dan berkata “POI” atau hal serupa, dan langsung
mematikan microphone peserta setelah.

d. Seusai Debat

10

Seusai debat, seluruh debater wajib keluar dari breakout room, dan bukan keluar
dari Zoom Building. Di kanan bawah, tekan tombol ‘Leave Room’ dan pilih
‘Leave Breakout Room’ (dan bukan Leave Meeting).

Breakout room akan dikhususkan untuk juri untuk melakukan deliberation setelah
perdebatan usai. Semua debater wajib untuk standby di dalam Zoom Building
karena Chair akan keluar dari breakout room untuk memanggil para tim di
ruangan tersebut untuk kembali ke breakout room untuk memberikan verbal
adjudication.

Saat juri telah selesai melakukan deliberation
dan memanggil seluruh tim yang berdebat di
ruangan tersebut untuk kembali ke ruangan,
maka peserta wajib untuk kembali ke
breakout room sesegera mungkin. Peserta
dapat melakukan ini dengan menekan tombol ‘Breakout Room’ di kanan bawah
(atau apabila tidak menemukan, tekan ‘More’ > ‘Join Breakout Room’.

Pop up ini akan muncul di layar peserta dan peserta dapat menekan ‘Join Breakout
Room’ untuk kembali ke breakout room tempat peserta berdebat tadi untuk
mendengarkan verbal adjudication.

Verbal adjudication adalah sesi dimana juri akan memberikan komentar-
komentar konstruktif mengenai debatnya, dan mengumumkan peringkat dalam

11

debat yang telah berjalan. Seluruh anggota tim wajib untuk mendengarkan verbal
adjudication yang diberikan.

Setelah verbal adjudication selesai diberikan, tim wajib memberikan feedback
score kepada juri yang memberikan verbal (perhatikan baik-baik siapa nama juri
yang memberikan verbal!).

Tim akan memberikan feedback score melalui Private URL yang diberikan. Isi
seluruh kolom dengan benar dengan panduan sebagai berikut:
Target: nama juri yang memberikan verbal
Overall score: skor yang diberikan kepada juri tersebut (feedback score range
akan diumumkan sehari sebelum perlombaan/simulasi)
Did you agree?: apakah peserta setuju atau tidak dengan keputusan tersebut
Comments: jelaskan pendapat peserta mengenai juri yang memberikan verbal
dan alasan peserta memberikan skor tersebut kepada juri yang bersangkutan.
Kami berharap untuk mendapatkan informasi yang jujur dan transparan agar CAP
dapat melakukan alokasi yang adil. Komentar/pendapat peserta hanya akan
diakses oleh CAP dan Tab Team dan bersifat rahasia.

Feedback diberikan oleh perwakilan tim, dan bukan oleh kedua anggota tim.

Seusai debat, verbal adjudication, dan memberikan feedback, para tim
diperbolehkan untuk keluar dari Zoom Building.

12

e. Constructive Feedback

Apabila ada waktu kosong di antara ronde, para tim diperbolehkan untuk meminta
constructive feedback (umpan balik yang diberikan oleh juri kepada debater di
luar Verbal Adjudication yang berfokus pada bagaimana tim dapat memperbaiki
dan mengembangkan teknik berdebatnya).

Para debater dapat mencari dan menghubungi juri yang telah menjuri mereka
untuk masuk ke voice channel team peserta dan meminta konstruktif di dalam
Server Teams dengan me-mention juri yang bersangkutan (dengan mengetik ‘@’
dan nama juri yang bersangkutan).

Peserta menggunakan aplikasi discord (Penggunaan Discord Server). Para
partisipan diwajibkan untuk mengganti nickname mereka di dalam Discord Server
sebagai berikut:

Debater:

Debater [Nama sesuai tabulasi]

Contoh: Debater Annisa Ilmi

Judge:
Judge [Nama sesuai tabulasi]
Contoh: Judge Andy Bayu

13

Adapun para partisipan diwajibkan untuk tetap standby dan memantau informasi
yang disebarkan melalui WhatsApp Group ataupun text channel Discord #general,
terutama waktu draw release ronde berikutnya. Panitia tidak bertanggung jawab
dan tidak menerima alasan apapun bagi tim yang tidak hadir dalam Zoom meeting
untuk ronde selanjutnya. Tim yang tidak hadir akan langsung digantikan oleh
swing team.

2. Prosedur lomba Non Debat
a. Public speaking dan storytelling
1). Draw
Draw adalah halaman yang menampilkan ruangan, posisi, dan juri peserta pada
ronde tersebut.
Draw akan dibagikan melalui grup WhatsApp.
Ketika peserta telah mendapatkan ruangan di mana peserta dialokasikan, peserta
diwajibkan untuk segera masuk ke Zoom building peserta melelui laman yang
dibagikan di whatsapp group.
Seluruh peserta juga diwajibkan untuk segera mengganti display name ketika
sudah berada dalam Zoom meeting.
Peserta dapat mengganti display name peserta melalui kolom “Participants” >
tekan nama peserta > tekan “More” > “Rename”.

Aturan penamaan peserta adalah sebagai berikut:
[Ronde] [Ruangan] [Jenis Lomba] [Nama Lengkap sesuai tabulasi]
Contoh untuk peserta Public Speaking:
R1 A.1 PS Eka Pratiwi
Contoh untuk peserta Storytelling

14

R1 A.1. S Rosy Assad
Contoh untuk juri:
R2 A.1 PS Judge Andy Bayu
R5 C.5 S Judge Hans Geovanni
2). Penampilan
Semua peserta wajib untuk masuk ke breakout room masing-masing sesegera
mungkin dengan menekan join saat pop up sebagai berikut muncul di Zoom
peserta.

Apabila pop up ini muncul, atau secara tidak sengaja peserta menekan tombol
“Later”, maka peserta dapat masuk ke breakout room dengan menekan opsi ini di
kanan bawah Zoom peserta.

Pastikan bahwa peserta sudah ada di dalam breakout room untuk memulai
penampilan. Judge di ruangan peserta akan sekaligus menjadi chairperson yang
memandu jalannya penampilan.

15

Sebelum peserta memulai speech/story, pastikan bahwa semua orang di ruangan
peserta dapat mendengar peserta. Kalimat-kalimat seperti “am I audible?” dapat
membantu memastikan bahwa speech/story peserta dapat tersampaikan dengan
baik.
Peserta dianjurkan untuk melakukan timing secara mandiri, namun Judge di
ruangan peserta akan melakukan timing juga. Peserta diwajibkan untuk
mematikan microphone peserta apabila bukan giliran peserta untuk memberikan
speech/story.

3). Penilaian
Juri menilai peserta dan mengisi Google Sheet yang akan diberikan panitia
melalui whatsapp group.
b. Poster
1) Peserta mendaftarkan diri sebagai peserta perorangan atau tim

beranggotakan maksimal 3 orang.
2) Poster dibuat dnegan tema “Life after Covid-19: A New Beginning”
3) Poster merupakan hasil karya orisinal yang belum pernah dipublikasikan

dan belum pernah diikutkan kompetisi pada kompetisi serupa.
4) Poster diserahkan dalam bentuk format JPG, JPEG, dengan ukuran A4,

ukuran file maksimum 5MB, cantumkan identitas penulis dan dikirim
melalui tautan ……. dengan penamaan file: NHPEO Poster_Nama_Judul
Poster. Contoh: NPEO Poster_Novatiar_Indonesia Sehat.
5) Poster menggunakan Bahasa Inggris
6) Batas akhir pengiriman karya: ……
7) Penilaian dilakukan oleh dewan juri yang ditentukan oleh panitia
8) Penilaian meliputi: a) Orisinalitas karya, b) Kesesuaian tema dan unsur
teknis, c) Kedalaman eksplorasi tema serta komunikasi dalam
menyampaikan pesan, e) Inovasi dan sisi artistik penyajian visual, f)
penggunaan Bahasa Inggris

9) 10 peserta terbaik akan mengikuti babak final (poster presentation).
10) Poster presentation merupakan ….

c. Vlog

16

1) Peserta mendaftarkan diri sebagai peserta perorangan atau tim
beranggotakan maksimal 3 orang. Peserta hanya boleh mengirimkan satu
karya.

2) Vlog dapat dibuat dengan tema “After Covid-19: What will ‘normal’ life
be like”.

3) Durasi vlog minimal 3 menit dan maksimal 5 menit.
4) Video harus orisinil, tidak melanggar hak cipta orang lain, tidak

mengandung SARA, belum pernah dipublikasikan sebelumnya dan belum
pernah diikutkan dalam lomba sejenis.
5) Peserta menggunakan Bahasa Inggris dalam Vlog yang dibuat
6) Peserta wajib mengunggah vlog di akun YouTube dan Instagram masing –
masing dengan menyertakan beberapa poin di bawah dalam deskripsi
YouTube dan Instagram:
Kalimat: NPEO2021 Vlog Competition
Hash Tag: #npeo2021, #poltekkesmakassar, #kemenkes
Tag : @npeo2021, @poltekkesmakassar, @kemenkes
7) Penilaian Vlog meliputi: a) Kesesuaian tema, Konsep dan kreativitas
dalam bercerita menggunakan audio visual dalam video, b) Penentuan
alur cerita video dilakukan dengan jelas dan berbobot, c) Penyampaian
pesan yang dapat dicerna, dan e) penggunaan bahasa

D. SUMBER DAYA YANG DIBUTUHKAN

Fasilitas yang dibutuhkan dalam ONPEO 2021 disiapkan oleh panitia. Ketersediaan
fasilitas sangat menentukan kualitas ONPEO 2021. Berikut adalah daftar sarana/prasarana
yang wajib dipenuhi dalam pelaksanaan ONPEO 2021.

A. Ruangan dan koneksi internet
1. Dua akun zoom untuk ruangan virtual debat
2. Akun zoom masing-masing untuk Public Speaking dan Storytelling
3. Ruang juri berkapasitas 50 orang dilengkapi dengan LCD Projector.
4. Ruangan untuk panitia.
5. Semua ruangan dilengkapi dengan koneksi internet yang baik

B. Alat
1. Lap Top/komputer
2. LCD Projector di ruang juri
3. LCD led TV untuk dipakai tabulator

E. PENGHARGAAN
Masing-masing pemenang dalam masing-masing kategori lomba akan mendapatkan:

A. Sertifikat diberikan kepada semua peserta
B. Sertifikat dan medali diberikan kepada 6 Best speakers Open Category dan 3 Best Speakers

Novice Category di lomba debat.

17

C. Medali dan sertifikat diberikan kepada Juara 1,2,3 dan 4 Open Category, Juara 1,2,3 dan 4
Novice category, Juara 1,2, dan 3 Public Speaking, Storytelling, Writing, Poster, dan Vlog.

D. Sertifikat diberikan kepada Juara harapan 1,2,dan 3 di Public Speaking, Storytelling,
Writing, Poster, dan Vlog.

F. JUARA UMUM
Penentuan juara umum didasarkan pada konversi skor yang diambil dari masing-masing
jenis lomba. Berikut adalah daftar konversi:

Jenis lomba Prestasi Skor Bobot Total
Debat Bahasa Juara 1 7 15
Inggris
Juara 2 6 10
Public Juara 3 5 8
Speaking Juara 4 4 7
Juara 1 Novice 4 6
Storytelling Juara 2 Novice 3 5
Juara 3 Novice 2 4
Writing Juara 4 Novice 1 3
Best Speaker 1 5 10
Best Speaker 2 4 9
Best Speaker 3 3 8
Best Speaker 4 2 7
Best Speaker 5 1 6
Best Speaker 6 1 5
Juara 1 5 10

Juara 2 4 9
Juara 3 3 8
Harapan 1 1 7
Harapan 2 1 6
Harapan 3 1 5
Juara 1 5 10
Juara 2 4 9
Juara 3 3 8
Harapan 1 1 7
Harapan 2 1 6
Harapan 3 1 5
Juara 1 5 10
Juara 2 4 9
Juara 3 3 8
Harapan 1 1 7
Harapan 2 1 6

18

Poster Harapan 3 1 5
Vlog Juara 1 5 10
Juara 2 4 9
Juara 3 3 8
Harapan 1 1 7
Harapan 2 1 6
Harapan 3 1 5
Juara 1 5 10
Juara 2 4 9
Juara 3 3 8
Harapan 1 1 7
Harapan 2 1 6
Harapan 3 1 5

G. PENUTUP

Buku panduan ONHPEO 2021 ini diharapkan dapat membantu pelaksanaan lomba debat
bahasa Inggris antar Politeknik se-Indonesia. Dengan pelaksanaan ONHPEO 2021 yang
menggunakan sistem tertata, diharapkan kualitas tim debat politeknik kesehatan Indonesia
akan semakin berkualitas dan mampu bersaing di tingkat Internasional.

19

LAMPIRAN 1

STANDING RULES OF DEBATE CONTEST

A. Format
1. The debate will consist of four teams of two persons (persons will be known as

"members"), a chairperson (known as the "Speaker of the House" or "Mister/Madam
Speaker" and an adjudicator or panel of adjudicators.
2. Teams will consist of the following members:
3. Members will deliver substantive speeches in the following order:
Prime Minister;
Opposition Leader;
Deputy Prime Minister;
Deputy Opposition Leader;
Member for the Government;
Member for the Opposition;
Government Whip;
Opposition Whip.

Opening Government:
"Prime Minister" or "First Government member" and
"Deputy Prime Minister" or "Second Government member";

Opening Opposition:
"Leader of the Opposition" or "First Opposition member" and
"Deputy Leader of the Opposition" or "Second Opposition member";

Closing Government:
"Member for the Government" or "Third Government member" and
"Government Whip" or "Fourth Opposition member";

Closing Opposition:
"Member for the Opposition" or "Third Opposition member" and
"Opposition Whip" or "Fourth Opposition member".

4. Members will deliver a substantive speech of seven minutes duration and should offer
points of information while members of the opposing teams are speaking.

B. The motion
1. The motion should be unambiguously worded.
2. The motion should reflect that the National Polytechnic Debating Championship is a

national level tournament.
3. The members should debate the motion in the spirit of the motion and the tournament.

20

C. Preparation
1. The debate should commence 30 minutes after the motion is announced.
2. Teams should arrive at their debate within five minutes of the scheduled starting time for

that debate.
3. Members are permitted to use printed or written material during preparation and during the

debate. Printed material includes books, journals, newspapers and other similar materials.
The use of electronic equipment is prohibited during preparation and in the debate.

D. Points of Information
1. Points of Information (questions directed to the member speaking) may be asked between first

minute mark and the six-minute mark of the members’ speeches (speeches are of seven minutes
duration).
2. To ask a Point of Information, a member should stand, place one hand on his or her head and
extend the other towards the member speaking. The member may announce that they would
like to ask a "Point of Information" or use other words to this effect.
3. The member who is speaking may accept or decline to answer the Point of Information.
4. Points of Information should not exceed 15 seconds in length.
5. The member who is speaking may ask the person offering the Point of Information to sit down
where the offeror has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard and understood.
6. Members should attempt to answer at least two Points of Information during their speech.
Members should also offer Points of Information.
7. Points of Order and Points of Personal Privilege are not permitted.

E. Timing of the speeches
1. Speeches should be seven minutes in duration (this should be signaled by two strikes of the

gavel). Speeches over seven minutes and 20 seconds may be penalized.
2. Points of Information may only be offered between the first-minute mark and the six-

minute mark of the speech (this period should be signaled by one strike of the gavel at the first
minute and one strike at the sixth minute).
3. It is the duty of the Speaker of the House to time speeches.
4. In the absence of the Speaker of the House, it is the duty of the Chair of the Adjudication panel
to ensure that speeches are timed.

F. The adjudication
1. The debate should be adjudicated by a panel of at least three adjudicators, where this is

possible.
2. At the conclusion of the debate, the adjudicators should confer and rank the teams, from first

place to last place.
3. There will be verbal adjudication of the debate after the first six preliminary rounds of the

tournament.

21

G. The definition
1. The definition should state the issue (or issues) for debate arising out of the motion

and state the meaning of any terms in the motion which require interpretation.
2. The Prime Minister should provide the definition at the beginning of his or her speech.
3. The definition must:

a. have a clear and logical link to the motion - this means that an average reasonable
person would accept the link made by the member between the motion and the
definition (where there is no such link the definition is sometimes referred to as a
"squirrel");

b. not be self-proving - a definition is self-proving when the case is that something
should or should not be done and there is no reasonable rebuttal. A definition is may
also be self-proving when the case is that a certain state of affairs exists or does not
exist and there is no reasonable rebuttal (these definitions are sometimes referred to
as "truisms").

c. not be time set - this means that the debate must take place in the present and that
the definition cannot set the debate in the past or the future; and

d. not be place set unfairly - this means that the definition cannot restrict the debate
so narrowly to a particular geographical or political location that a participant of the
tournament could not reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the place.

H. Challenging the definition
1. The Leader of the Opposition may challenge the definition if it violates clause of these
rules.
2. The Leader of the Opposition should clearly state that he or she is challenging the
definition.
3. The Leader of the Opposition should substitute an alternative definition after challenging
the definition of the Prime Minister.

I. Assessing the definitional challenge
1. The adjudicator should determine the definition to be ‘unreasonable’.
2. The onus to establish that the definition is unreasonable is on the members asserting
that the definition is unreasonable.
3. Where the definition is unreasonable, the opposition should substitute an alternative
definition that should be accepted by the adjudicator provided it is not unreasonable.
4. Where the definition of the Opening Government is unreasonable and an alternative
definition is substituted by the Opening Opposition, the Closing Government may
introduce matter which is inconsistent with the matter presented by the Opening
Government and consistent with the definition of the Opening Opposition.
5. If the Opening Opposition has substituted a definition that is also unreasonable, the
Closing Government may challenge the definition of the Opening Opposition and
substitute an alternative definition.

22

6. If the Closing Government has substituted a definition that is also unreasonable (in
addition to the unreasonable definitions of the Opening Government and Opening
Opposition, the Closing Opposition may challenge the definition of the Closing
Government and substitute an alternative definition.

23

J. The definition of matter
1. Matter is the content of the speech. It is the arguments a debater uses to further his
or her case and persuade the audience.
2. Matter includes arguments and reasoning, examples, case studies, facts and any other
material that attempts to further the case.
3. Matter includes positive (or substantive) material and rebuttal (arguments
specifically aimed to refute the arguments of the opposing team(s)). Matter includes
Points of Information.

K. The elements of matter
1. Matter should be relevant, logical and consistent.
2. Matter should be relevant. It should relate to the issues of the debate: positive material

should support the case being presented and rebuttal should refute the material being
presented by the opposing team(s). The Member should appropriately prioritize and
apportion time to the dynamic issues of the debate.
3. Matter should be logical. Arguments should be developed logically in order to be clear and
well-reasoned and therefore plausible. The conclusion of all arguments should support the
member’s case.
4. Matter should be consistent. Members should ensure that the matter they present is
consistent within their speech, their team and the remainder of the members on their side
of the debate.
5. All Members should present positive matter (except the final two members in the debate)
and all members should present rebuttal (except the first member in the debate). The
Government Whip may choose to present positive matter.
6. All Members should attempt to answer at least two points of information during their own
speech and offer points of information during opposing speeches.

L. Assessing matter
1. The matter presented should be persuasive. ‘The elements of matter’ should assist an

adjudicator to assess the persuasiveness and credibility of the matter presented.
2. Matter should be assessed from the viewpoint of the average reasonable person.

Adjudicators should analyze the matter presented and assess its persuasiveness, while
disregarding any specialist knowledge they may have on the issue of the debate. Members
should not be discriminated against on the basis of religion, sex, race, color, nationality,
sexual preference, age, social status or disability.
3. Points of information should be assessed according to the effect they have on the
persuasiveness of the cases of both the member answering the point of information and the
member offering the point of information.

M. The definition of manner
1. Manner is the presentation of the speech. It is the style and structure a member
uses to further his or her case and persuade the audience.

24

2. Manner is comprised of many separate elements. Some, but not all, of these
elements are listed below.

N. The elements of style
1. The elements of style include eye contact, voice modulation, hand gestures,
language, the use of notes and any other element which may affect the
effectiveness of the presentation of the member.
2. Eye contact will generally assist a member to persuade an audience as it allows the
member to appear more sincere.
3. Voice modulation will generally assist a member to persuade an audience as the
debater may emphasize important arguments and keep the attention of the audience.
This includes the pitch, tone, and volume of the member’s voice and the use of
pauses.
4. Hand gestures will generally assist a member to emphasize important arguments.
Excessive hand movements may however be distracting and reduce the
attentiveness of the audience to the arguments.
5. Language should be clear and simple. Members who use language which is too
verbose or confusing may detract from the argument if they lose the attention of the
audience.
6. The use of notes is permitted, but members should be careful that they do not rely
on their notes too much and detract from the other elements of manner.

O. The elements of structure
1. The elements of structure include the structure of the speech of the member and the
structure of the speech of the team.
2. The matter of the speech of each member must be structured. The member should
organize his or her matter to improve the effectiveness of their presentation. The
substantive speech of each member should:
3. The matter of the team must be structured. The team should organize their matter to
improve the effectiveness of their presentation. The team should:
a. contain a consistent approach to the issues being debated; and
b. allocate positive matter to each member where both members of the team are
introducing positive matter; and
c. include: an introduction, conclusion and a series of arguments; and
d. be well-timed in accordance with the time limitations and the need to prioritize and
apportion time to matter.

P. Assessing manner

1. Adjudicators should assess the elements of manner together in order to determine the

overall effectiveness of the member’s presentation. Adjudicators should assess

whether the member’s presentation is assisted or diminished by their manner.

2. Adjudicators should not allow bias to influence their assessment. Members should not be

discriminated against on the basis of religion, sex, race, color, nationality, language, sexual

preference, age, social status or disability.

25

Q. The role of the adjudicator
1. The adjudicator must:

a. Confer upon and discuss the debate with the other adjudicators;
b. Determine the rankings of the teams;
c. Determine the team grades;
d. Determine the speaker marks;
e. Provide a verbal adjudication to the members; and
f. Complete any documentation required by the tournament.
2. The adjudication panel should attempt to agree on the adjudication of the debate.
Adjudicators should therefore confer in a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect
3. Adjudicators should acknowledge that adjudicators on a panel may form different or
opposite views of the debate. Adjudicators should therefore attempt to base their
conclusions on these rules in order to limit subjectivity and to provide a consistent
approach to the assessment of debates.

R. Ranking teams
1. Teams should be ranked from first place to last place. First placed teams should be
awarded three points, second placed teams should be awarded two points, third
placed teams should be awarded one point and fourth placed teams should be
awarded zero points.
2. Teams may receive zero points where they fail to arrive at the debate more than five
minutes after the scheduled time for debate.
3. Teams may receive zero points where the adjudicators unanimously agree that the
Member has (or Members have) harassed another debater on the basis of religion,
sex, race, color, nationality, sexual preference or disability.
4. Adjudicators should confer upon team rankings. Where a unanimous decision cannot
be reached after conferral, the decision of the majority will determine the rankings.
Where a majority decision cannot be reached, the Chair of the panel of adjudicators
will determine the rankings.

S. Grading and marking the teams
1. The panel of adjudicators should agree upon the grade that each team is to be awarded.

Each adjudicator may then mark the teams at their discretion but within the agreed
grade. Where there is a member of the panel who has dissented in the ranking of the
teams, that adjudicator will not need to agree upon the team grades and may complete
their score sheet at their own discretion.
2. Team grades and marks should be given the following interpretation:

26

Grade Marks Meaning

Excellent to flawless. The standard you would expect to see from a
A 180-200 team at the Semi Final/Grand Final level of the tournament. The team

has much strength and few, if any, weaknesses.

Above average to very good. The standard you would expect to see
B 160-179 from a team at the finals level or in contention to make to the finals.

The team has clear strengths and some minor weaknesses.

C 140-159 Average. The team has strengths and weaknesses in roughly equal
proportions.

D 120-139 Poor to below average. The team has clear problems and some minor
strength.

E 100-119 Very poor. The team has fundamental weaknesses and few, if any,
strengths.

3. Individual members’ marks should be given the following interpretation:

Grade Marks Meaning

Excellent to flawless. The standard of speech you would expect to see
A 90-100 from a speaker at the Semi Final/Grand Final level of the tournament.

This speaker has much strength and few, if any, weaknesses.

Above average to very good. The standard you would expect to see
B 80-89 from a speaker at the finals level or in contention to make to the

finals. This speaker has clear strengths and some minor weaknesses.

Average. The speaker has strengths and weaknesses and roughly
C 70-79 equal proportions.

Poor to below average. The team has clear problems and some minor
D 60-69 strength.

Very poor. This speaker has fundamental weaknesses and few, if any,
E 50-59 strengths.

T. Verbal adjudications
1. At the conclusion of the conferral, the adjudication panel should provide a verbal

adjudication of the debate.
2. The verbal adjudication should be delivered by the Chair of the adjudication panel, or

where the Chair dissents, by a member of the adjudication panel nominated by the Chair
of the panel.
3. The verbal adjudication should not exceed 10 minutes.
4. The members must not harass the adjudicators following the verbal adjudication.

27

5. The members may approach an adjudicator for further clarification following the verbal
adjudication; these inquiries must at all times be polite and non-confrontational.
a. identify the order in which the teams were ranked
b. explain the reasons for the rankings of team, ensuring that each team is referred to
in this explanation; and
c. provide constructive comments to individual members where the adjudication panel
believes this is necessary.

Standing Rules for the Operation of the Debate Contest
Rule I: General Regulations.
A. Dates for the Tournament. The tournament shall be held in July.
B. Registration Regulations. Process of registration must be announced at least two months

prior to the tournament.
C. Format
The format of the debate shall be as follows:

1. Overview of the Format
28

a. There shall be preliminary rounds of debate, involving all teams eligible to debate
in the Competitions.

b. Seminars on debating and adjudicating are mandatory.
c. Following the preliminary rounds, there shall be an elimination round consisting of

the top 16 teams from the preliminary round.
2. The Preliminary Rounds
a. All teams eligible to debate at the Competitions compete in the preliminary rounds
b. Composite or "swing" teams must be added by the Tournament Director to under

the following circumstances:
1) If the number of teams eligible to debate in the preliminary rounds is equal to

a number divisible by two, no composite teams are allowed; or
2) If this is not the case, then composite teams may be added until the number of

teams in the preliminary round is equal to a number divisible by two.
3) If a team withdraws from competition before or during the preliminary rounds

then they shall be removed from the draw and replaced with a composite team.
3. Selection of teams for the elimination rounds
a. At the conclusion of the preliminary rounds, teams are ranked in consecutive order

(from highest to lowest) as follows:
1) Total aggregate Victory Points accumulated by the team; and
2) Total team score acculumated from speakers’ points
b. The highest 16 ranking teams will participate in the Main Competition elimination
rounds, and shall be ranked from 1st to 16th.
c. Teams shall compete in the elimination rounds subject to the qualification
requirements of this Constitution.
4. The Main Competition elimination rounds
a. At the conclusion of each of the Semi Finals, the adjudication panel shall select
two winning team from each debate. The teams shall progress to the next
elimination round.
b. In the Final, the adjudication panel shall select the one winning team and the
runner-up.

Rule II: Participant Qualification.
Health Polytechnic may qualify a team of three to four student-debaters for participating in the
tournament.
A. Any student in compliance with the eligibility definitions of Health Polytechnic is eligible

to represent his or her Health polytechnic.
B. A team is composed of two eligible debaters from a single subscribing institution.
C. To be an eligible debater, a student must provide official documents from appropriate

polytechnic officials verifying that he/she is registered as a Health polytechnic student and
delegate of the ONHPEO.

Rule III: ONHPEO Adjudicator.
i. Adjudicator Composition

1. A round in a competition shall be judged by odd number of adjudicator or a single
adjudicator (excluding trainee adjudicator).

2. In a single adjudication, the adjudicator acts as the chair.
3. In a panel adjudication, a chair adjudicator leads the adjudication accompanied by two

or four panel adjudicators.

29

4. Trainee adjudicator shall be allocated in preliminary rounds based on his or her
accreditation scores and conflict of interest.

ii. Qualification for adjudicator to attain eligibility for judging at the NPEDC:
1. An adjudicator must comprehend the system of adjudication in British Parliamentary
debating system
2. An adjudicator is mandatory to attend all processes of adjudicator accreditation
3. The adjudicators consist of representative adjudicators of the participating institutions
and invited adjudicators
4. Invited adjudicators are appointed by the host in coordination with the ONHPEO
council.
5. To be an eligible adjudicator, the adjudicator must secure a minimum C grade during
the accreditation test.
6. Adjudicator that has not secured a minimum C grade is still allowed to adjudicate as a
trainee adjudicator. A trainee adjudicator is subject to report to an accredited
adjudicator and his/her decision is not binding to the result of the match.
7. All adjudicators are subject to written evaluation form from the debaters.
8. All adjudicators may and will experience the changes of the accreditation.
9. The adjudicators have the right to know the results of their accreditation.
10. The decision of adjudicator in each room is final, binding, and not subject to change in
any kind of condition.

C. Adjudicator Obligations of Participating Polytechnics.
The ONHPEO Committee strongly encourages participating health polytechnics to do all
that they can insure that their judging obligations are covered. In the event that a team's
judging obligation is uncovered, the Council of the ONHPEO will invoke that the team is
disqualified if the team does not have a designated adjudicator.

D. Invited Adjudicator.
1. The nomination of persons to serve as invited adjudicators at the ONHPEO shall be a
primary responsibility of the host committees.
2. Invited adjudicators are well-experienced adjudicators satisfying qualification
requirements that will be established by the host commmittee.
3. The host commitee shall appoint, if necessary, additional invited adjudicators of his or
her own choosing.
4. Each invited adjudicator shall be paid a stipend plus an allotment for food as determined
by the committee.

Rule IV: General Tournament Procedures.
A. Speech format.
The following speaking format shall be employed in all debates:

1. Speaking time for substantive speeches is 7 minutes,
2. The method of signaling timing for speakers is at the discretion of the host.
3. In addition to time signals, team members or the team coach may give time signals to

a speaker provided that the signals are discreet and unobtrusive.
4. Points of informations are allowed between 2nd minute to 6th minute of the substantive

speech

B. Announcement of Round Pairings.

30

The Tournament Director shall orally announce the pairings before each round. The display of
the pairings shall be provided as soon as possible.

C. Beginning Rounds.
At the announcement of pairings, the Tournament Director shall announce a designated starting
time for the round.

D. Case Building
1. Case building time is 15 minutes.
2. Only two debaters are allowed to do case building.
3. Debaters are allowed to bring any printed materials but no internet connection during
the case building.

Rule V: Tournament Scheduling.
A. Pairing Rounds.

1. Round one of the Tournament shall be randomly matched.
2. After the first round the tournament should be completely power matched reflecting the

following criteria: (1) victory points, and (2) total speaker points.
B. Assignment of Adjudicators

1. Preliminary Procedures or before the start of the Tournament:
a. At registration, all adjudicators shall complete a form declaring their conflicts of
interest with any polytechnic or debaters in the Tournament.
b. A form of mutual preference shall be used.

2. Following the pairing of each round, adjudicators are assigned according to the
discretion of the Tournament Director. The following constraints operate to disqualify
the adjudicators from assignment (in decreasing order of importance):
a. The adjudicator cannot judge a team from his or her polytechnic.
b. The adjudicator shall not judge a team he or she has previously judged on the same
side.
c. The adjudicator shall not judge a team on his or her conflict of interest list.

Rule VI: Motions
A. Adjudication core are responsible for composing the motions.
B. Motions should reflect national or international issues.
C. Host committee shall release list of motions two weeks prior to the tournament.

Rule VII: Sanctions
Sanctions to participating team are in the discretion of the Council Board.

Rule VIII: Awards
A. A special permanent award shall be given to each participant and each polytechnic.
B. Awards denoting their level of accomplishment shall be presented to all teams in the

elimination rounds.
C. Awards shall be presented to the top ten speakers in the tournament.

Rule IX: Evaluation.
A. Forms soliciting suggestions for improving the ONHPEO shall be provided to each debater,

representative and invited adjudicator at the tournament.

31

Rule X: Amendment.
A. These Standing Rules may be amended by the ONHPEO Council Meeting.

Standing Rules for the Operation of the NON DEBATE CONTEST
General Introduction

The CONTEST is not debating, elocution or acting. The competition is concerned with the
competitor’s effective use of language to convey a message or a point of view to an interested
audience. Choice of words,intonation, articulation, pace and pausing are all important in
conveying the message in a speech. Anything which hinders the transmission of meaning or
diverts attention from the speaker’s presentation should be avoided. This includes unnecessary
and inappropriate gestures, affected pronunciation, over use of dramatics, unnecessary
movement, irrelevant humour and mannerisms
I. RULES FOR DEMONSTRATION SPEAKING
A. Purpose of the Category:
To develop skills in expository speaking with emphasis on skill in exhibiting a process using
objects or physical activity.
B. Definition of the Category:
A demonstration speech explains how to do something or how something works. Objects or
physical activity by the demonstrator must be exhibited. Visual aids (charts, graphs, diagrams,
maps, pictures, etc.) are optional and may be used to enhance the demonstration but are not to
take the place of objects or activity. The speech must be instructive and present valuable and
significant information.
C. Rules:
1. The speech must be original with the participant.
2. Objects or physical activity by the demonstrator must be exhibited.

32

3. Presentations will take place in normal-sized classrooms with normal-sized doors. A table
or desk will be supplied. All visual aids, properties and equipment are to be supplied by the
speaker.
4. This category prohibits the use of properties or equipment endangering the health or safety
of the participant, audience or judge. This includes, but is not limited to, firearms, sharp knives,
dangerous chemicals and animals.
5. One other person, and only one, may be used to assist the demonstrator by serving as the
object of demonstration or by helping to set up, strike, or handle equipment. It is permissible
for the aide to be both an object of demonstration and to help with the equipment. The aide
shall not be considered a contestant; shall not be eligible for an award. The assistant may be a
contestant in another category, but the committees are not responsible for special scheduling
arrangements that this may require.
6. Maximum time limit: 7 minutes, including set up and strike down. A 15 second grace period
is allowed, after which one point will be deducted from that evaluation item dealing with rate.
7. The use of both sides of one 4x6 note card is optional.
D. Criteria for Evaluation:
1. The extent to which the topic content reflected value or significance to the speaker.
2. The extent to which the use of objects and/or physical activity was visible and effectively
incorporated into the demonstration process.
3. The extent to which the presentation: (a) achieved effective organization, and (b) employed
effective language skills, including such items as use of transitions and clear, vivid and
appropriate word choices.
4. The extent to which the vocal presentation was clear and appropriate to the subject, including
such items as articulation, pronunciation, volume, rate, pitch and voice quality.
5. The extent to which the physical presence contributed to the clarity and effectiveness of the
presentation, including such items as facial expression, eye contact, gestures and bodily
movement.

III. RULES FOR ORATORY
A. Purpose of the Category:

To develop skill in composing and presenting a formal speech on a significant
topic.

B. Definition of the Category:
In Oratory, the oration is expected to be a thoroughly prepared, well composed, well expressed
speech of exhortation on a significant topic. As such, the oration must be unequivocally
persuasive in its purpose. It may fulfill its persuasive challenge in one of three ways: 1) by
alerting the audience to the existence of a problem; 2) by affirming the existence of a problem
and offering a solution; 3) by urging the adoption of a policy. While the topic of the oration
should be of significance to general society, it should be adapted to an audience composed of
the speaker's peers. The good oration is characterized by clear, vivid, and forceful language
and appropriate stylistic devices such as metaphor, comparison/contrast, irony, etc. Finally,
thoughtfulness as reflected in the choice of an approach to the topic and the quality of
supporting materials is a necessary part of the good oration.
C. Rules:
1. The speech is to be original with the participant.
2. Properties or visual aids are not permitted.
3. Maximum time limit: 7 minutes. A 15 second grace period is allowed, after
which one point will be deducted from that evaluation item dealing with rate.

33

4. The use of both sides of one 4x6 note card is optional.
D. Criteria for Evaluation:
1. The extent to which the content (a) reflected a worthwhile topic, and (b) provided quality
modes of support materials, including analysis, reasoning and
factual information. Researched material must be verbally attributed to a source(s).
2. The extent to which organizational structure (introduction, body, conclusion) was both clear
and effective.
3. The extent to which clear and compelling language as well as effective stylistic
devices were used appropriately.
4. The extent to which the vocal presentation was clear and appropriate to the
subject including such items as articulation, pronunciation, volume, rate, pitch
and voice quality.
5. The extent to which the physical presence contributed to the clarity and effectiveness of the
presentation, including such items as facial expression, eye
contact, gestures and bodily movement.

IV. RULES FOR PUBLIC ADDRESS
A. Purpose of the Category:
To develop the skill of providing a directly responsive statement to an issue of
current public discussion.

B. Definition of the Category:
The challenge to the speaker is to contribute to the public dialog on a contemporary issue by
presenting a well-informed statement which is directly
responsive to a question about that issue. The speaker is to be knowledgeable and
is to use quality supporting material to substantiate his/her position. As in all
speaking categories, the Public Address speech is to be well organized, clear, and
effectively presented.
The possible topic areas and specific questions are:
1. Terrorism: To what extent, if any, has recent military involvement made the
world a safer place?
2. Nuclear Power: In light of the nuclear disaster in Japan, what, if any, should be
the future of nuclear power in the United States?
3. Fine Arts Programming: Given the current state budget crisis, to what extent, if any, should
Wisconsin public schools continue to fund fine arts classes?
4. Technology: To what extent the harm and benefit of the advanced technology?

C. Rules:
1. The speech must be original with the participant.
2. Auxiliary audio/visual materials are not permitted.
3. Maximum time limit: 7 minutes. A 15 second grace period is allowed, after
which one point will be deducted from that evaluation item dealing with rate.
4. The use of both sides of one 4x6 note card is optional.
D. Criteria for Evaluations:
1. The extent to which a direct and well defined response to the question was
provided.
2. The extent to which the speaker analyzed and organized the ideas to provide
the answer.
3. The extent to which the content (a) supported the main idea with worthwhile

34

evidence, and (b) employed effective language skills including such items as use of transitions
and clear, vivid and appropriate word choices. Researched material must be verbally attributed
to a source(s).
4. The extent to which the vocal presentation was clear and appropriate to the
subject, including such items as articulation, pronunciation, volume, rate, pitch
and voice quality.
5. The extent to which the physical presence contributed to the clarity and effectiveness of the
presentation, including such items as facial expression, eye
contact, gestures and bodily movement.

VIII. RULES FOR STORYTELLING
A. Purpose of the Category:

To develop skill in presenting imaginative material of the narrative form.
B. Definition of the Category:
To tell a story is to chronicle events. The burden of the storyteller is to chronicle those events
in a coherent, unified, clear, and interesting manner. The storyteller may use vocal variation
and physical movement to suggest different characters and character relationships in order to
make the story clearer and more interesting. The storyteller must sit in a chair; other costumes
or props are not permitted. It should be remembered throughout that the emphasis of the
storyteller's art is on the teller as intermediary or narrator. The student is expected to
"demonstrate a sense of audience", that is, tell the chosen story in such a manner that it would
be suitable for the intended audience, be it young children, teenagers, adults or chronologically
advanced. Material for storytelling will be chosen by the student based on the topic areas
announced by the committee. A student will choose and rehearse one or more different stories
for each topic area. Original material is acceptable.
C. Rules:
1. A brief introduction identifying author, title and intended audience is required.
3. No other costumes, props, or visual material may be used. Vocal music, if used, must be
incidental and consist of no more than thirty(30) seconds total, after which there will be a one
point deduction.
4. Notes are not permitted.
5. Maximum time limit: 7 minutes. A 15 second grace period is allowed, after which one point
will be deducted from that evaluation item dealing with rate.
D. Criteria for Evaluation:
1. The extent to which the story as told constituted a coherent, spontaneous and unified
narrative appropriate to the topic area.
2. The extent to which the teller's choice of language and introduction was appropriate to the
chosen story and audience.
3. The extent to which nonverbal expressions, including such items as gestures, facial
expression and bodily movement contributed to clarity.
4. The extent to which vocal aspects of the performance were appropriate and enhancing to the
meaning of the story, including such items as articulation, pronunciation, vocal clarity, volume,
rate and pitch.
5. The extent to which the suggestion of character and character relationship was appropriate
to the material.

Rule IX: Rules for Writing
1. Letter Writing

35

a. Purpose of the category
To develop skills in letter writing with emphasis written communication in a

specific situation.
b. Definition

A letter writing is a form of non-fictional written, typed communication. This
is usually written to facilitate communication between two individuals and is
usually sent to the recipient via mail.
c. Rules
1) The writing must be original
2) Participant will start writing after the release of writing prompts
3) The writing must be 500 words or fewer
4) All pieces should be typed and submitted as a Word document or rtf file
5) Each piece should be titled and page numbered
6) Participants submits their writing through the link provided by the

committee
d. Criteria for evaluation

1) The extent of which the the structure of writing followed the intended letter
formats

2) The extent of which the the letter met the adherence to the theme
3) The extent of which the writing reflected creativity and effective language

skills including the use of appropriate words choice and acceptable
grammatical order,
e. Prompts example

Please reply the following letter.

John Adam,
Jakarta
April 20, 2020
Sudirman St,
167/A Menteng,
Central Jakarta.

Dear Andy,

I know that you and the rest of my friends at work have
probably been wondering why I have been out of the office so
much during the last couple of weeks. I have been undergoing
some tests to evaluate the symptoms that I’ve been
experiencing. They have found that I will need some
treatments, and I am scheduled to begin those next weeks.

During the next few months, I will likely need to reduce my
workload a bit, and I have already discussed this with our
management. They have arranged for me to be able to work
from home, and reduce my hours here in the office until my
medical issues are resolved. They have been incredibly

36

understanding and supportive, and I believe that I’ll be back full
time before you all start to miss me too much.

I am letting you know because we have a long standing
relationship, and I regard you as a friend. I’m not comfortable
talking about my illness with the whole of the office. I would
appreciate it if you would only share the necessary facts with
anyone who might inquire.

I appreciate your friendship, and your discretion. Feel free to
keep me in the loop over the next few weeks. I’ll be checking
email, and you can always reach me by phone.

Thanks and Regards,

John Adam

2. Expository Writing
a. Purpose of the category

To develop skills of writing that explain a topic in a logical and straightforward
manner.

b. Definition
Expository writing is used to provide readers with explanations, and the steps in
a process. It is defined by its logical sequencing and transitions. It is written
with the assumption that the reader does not have any prior knowledge about the
topic that is being discussed. Expository writing can be used as a tool to show
the reader why something is or how it works

c. Rules
1) The writing must be original
2) Participant will start writing after the release of writing prompts
3) The writing must be 500 to 800 words
4) All pieces should be typed and submitted as a Word document or rtf file.
5) Each piece should be titled and page numbered
6) Participants submits their writing through the link provided by the committee

d. Criteria for evaluation

1) Consistent Structure: It will follow the traditional essay structure with an
introduction, a body, and a conclusion.

2) a Clear Thesis: The thesis is the basis for the piece, and it will be the process
participants will be explaining or the position of the argument.

3) Clearly Presented Steps or Reasons: The body of the paragraph will need to
consist of clear steps or reasons, that are easy to follow, understand, and follow
a logical order.

4) Concluding Paragraph: The conclusion of the essay should touch on
e. Prompts example

37

1) Think about a new invention you would like to create. Describe this invention
and tell what it can do

2) Think of some things you learned outside of school. For example, you learn
from pet care, television, or grandparents. Explain what you learned

3. Persuasive Writing

a. Purpose of the category
To develop skills of persuasion in written form

b. Definition
A piece of writing that tries to convince or influence a reader to believe what you
believe about a certain topic. It takes a position for or against something.

c. Rules

1) The writing must be original
2) Participant will start writing after the release of writing prompts
3) The writing must be 500 to 800 words
4) All pieces should be typed and submitted as a Word document or rtf file.
5) Each piece should be titled and page numbered
6) Participants submits their writing through the link provided by the

committee

d. Criteria for evaluation

1) Text structure: The organization of the structural components of a
persuasive text (introduction, body and conclusion) into an appropriate and
effective text structure

2) Ideas: The selection, relevance and elaboration of ideas for a persuasive
argument

3) Persuasive devices: The use of a range of persuasive devices to enhance the
writer’s position and persuade the reader

4) Vocabulary: The range and precision of contextually appropriate language
choices

5) Paragraphing: The segmenting of text into paragraphs that assists the reader
to follow the line of argument

6) Sentence structure: The production of grammatically correct, structurally
sound and meaningful sentences

e. Prompts examples

1) People Be Allowed to Obscure Their Identities Online.
2) Social media result in more harm than good for children

Rule X: Rules for Poster
A. Purpose of the category

38

To engage the students’ interest in an issue, reveal community issues, and raise
awareness of an issue in a way that is visual, inclusive and fun.

B. Definition
Poster competitions raise awareness of issues and participation programs. Posters
provide visual, colourful, simple ways to communicate community issues and
events, and are suitable for display in community spaces. Poster competitions can
generate publicity and provide information

C. Rules

1. Each participant is allowed to send only one poster a
2. Posters that are sent are in accordance with the theme of the competition
3. Posters submitted are original creation, have never been published or have

not been included in any poster competitions.
4. Posters are made in digital form (using Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator,

Corel Draw, etc.) with A3 paper sizes.
5. Posters are sent in the format of jpg, jpeg, or png.
6. Posters do not contain elements of SARA, pornography, provocation,

discrimination, gambling, violence, and follow the legal norm of the
Republic of Indonesia.

D. Criteria for Evaluation
Criteria for judging posters:
1. The layout, design and color combinations of the poster are adequate and text
and graphs are balanced
2. The title, figures and graphs are relevant to the content
3. The synthesis of the poster must include the following sections: (i)
background and public health significance, (ii) objectives, (iii) process
(including challenges), (iv) output or results, (v) implications/take home
message (including implications at the national level)
4. The poster is self-explanatory.
5. The poster displays coherent information.
6. Organization: The poster display should be well organized and clearly show
the flow of presentation either by using appropriate headings or by the use of
arrows or connecting lines

Rule XI: Rules for Vlog
A. Purpose of the category
To engage the students’ interest in an issue, reveal community issues, and raise
awareness of an issue in attractive audio-visual display.

B. Definition

39

Video blogs can be more personalized than text-based ones. This is because
emotions can be depicted with a human face, and presentation skills can be fairly
demonstrated. Video blogs are also good at providing quick information compared
to other blog categories.

C. Rules

1. Videos should be in English.
2. The video entry should be uploaded to a YouTube account and set to

“public”. The video description on Youtube should include:
– team member names
– a very brief explanation of what the video is trying to show and the
relation to the theme “After Covid-19: What will ‘normal’ life be like”
– a statement along these lines: This is our entry to the #NHPEO2021 Vlog
competition

-an email address where we can contact you

- A hash tag: #npeo2021, #poltekkesmakassar, #kemenkes

- Tag : @npeo2021, @poltekkesmakassar, @kemenkes

3. The Video should last 3 to 5 minutes.
4. Videos submitted are original creation, have never been published or have

not been included in any Vlog competitions.
5. Videos do not contain elements of SARA, pornography, provocation,

discrimination, gambling, violence, and follow the legal norm of the
Republic of Indonesia.

D. Criteria for Evaluation

1. Impact – what you feel when you first view the Entry. Does the video
evoke an emotion from the viewer? Does the video engage you from the
onset or does it lose momentum?

2. Creativity – how the participant is able to convey their idea, message or
thought in an original and imaginative way through their lens, narrative,
performance, etc.

3. Style – how the participant is able to showcase their personal originality
and technique to influence how the video is presented and interpreted.

4. Subject Matter – is the subject matter addressed in the narrative,
performance and music (if applicable) in the video appropriately represent
the theme?

5. Story Telling – how the participant is able to let their Video Entry evoke
the viewer’s imagination, which may differ by each viewer.

Rule XII: Participant Qualification.

40

Any student in compliance with the eligibility definitions of Health Polytechnic under The
Ministry of Health is eligible to represent his or her polytechnic.

Rule XIII: Judging
A. Judges are selected on the basis of their communication skills, public speaking
experience and their ability torelate to varsities competitors.
B. Judges give equal consideration to both speeches in the allocation of marks.Judging is a
subjective process but will always be related to the nominated criteria and guidelines.
The judging and evaluation criteria is attached to this document.

Evaluation Sheet

Name :____________

Institution: ______________

Demonstration Speaking – 7 Minutes
Topic: ................................................................................................................................

Criteria Allocation of Points Points Remarks
Opening impact on Introduction
audience
Content Relevance of subject matter
Originality
Use of Language Structure
Delivery (coherence/logic/development)
Appropriate use of language
Conclusion Uses plain English
Pace, intonation, volume,
Sub Total pitch, humor,
body language, eye contact
Effective closing summary
Audience absorbed in
presentation

41

Evaluation Sheet

Name :____________

Institution: ______________

Oratory Speech - 7 Minutes
Topic: ...............................................................................................................................

Criteria Allocation of Points Points Remarks
Opening impact on Introduction
audience
Content Relevance of subject matter
Originality
Use of Language Structure
Delivery (coherence/logic/development)
Conclusion Appropriate use of language
Uses plain English
Pace, intonation, volume, pitch,
humor,body language, eye contact
Effective closing summary
Audience absorbed in presentation

Sub Total

Evaluation Sheet

Name :____________

Institution: ______________

Public Address: 7 Minutes
Topic: ...............................................................................................................................

Criteria Allocation of Points Points Remarks
Opening impact on Introduction
audience
Content Relevance of subject matter
Originality
Use of Language Structure
Delivery (coherence/logic/development)
Conclusion Appropriate use of language
Uses plain English
Pace, intonation, volume, pitch,
humor,body language, eye contact
Effective closing summary
Audience absorbed in presentation

Sub Total

42

Evaluation Sheet

Name :____________

Institution: ______________

Storytelling - 7 Minutes
Topic: ...............................................................................................................................

Criteria Allocation of Points Points Remarks
Opening impact on Introduction
audience
Content Relevance of subject matter
Originality
Use of Language Structure
Delivery (coherence/logic/development)
Appropriate use of language
Conclusion Uses plain English
Pace, intonation, volume,
pitch, humor,body language,
eye contact
Effective closing summary
Audience absorbed in
presentation

Voice Clarity and effective of
Sub Total expression

Evaluation Sheets for Letter Writing

Criteria Allocation of Points Points Remarks
Opening
Content - Introduction 15
30
Use of Language - Adherence to theme
Style and voice - Originality 20
- Structure 20
- Appropriate use of language

Is the writing unique? Does it
have a certain spark that keeps
you reading?

Does the writer have a rhythm
and way of using words which is
appropriate to their story and

43

Neatness & Structure enjoyable to read? Or a handicap
Sub Total to this piece?
Paper is presented appropriately 15
and according to contest rules
(including word minimums, font,
font size and spacing)

-

100

Criteria Evaluation sheet for expository writing Points Remarks
Opening Allocation of Points 15
Content 30
- Introduction
Use of Language 20
Arguments - Adherence to theme 20
- Originality
- Structure
- Appropriate use of language

Claims and supporting evidences
Logical flows of reasoning

Neatness & Structure Paper is presented appropriately 15
Sub Total and according to contest rules 100
(including word minimums, font,
font size and spacing)

-

Criteria Evaluation sheet for persuasive writing Points Remarks
Opening Allocation of Points 15
Content 30
- Introduction
Use of Language 20
Arguments - Adherence to theme 20
- Originality
- Structure
- Appropriate use of language

Claims and supporting evidences
Logical flows of reasoning

Neatness & Structure Paper is presented appropriately 15
Sub Total and according to contest rules 100
(including word minimums, font,
font size and spacing)

-

44

Evaluation sheet for Poster

Criteria Allocation of points Points Remarks
Display attributes Leterring size and quality 30 Remarks
Color combination
Content Lay out and design
Text, photographs and
Use of language graphs
Neatness and
structure Adherence to the theme 30
Originality 25
Sub Total Organization 15
Correct spelling and
Criteria terminology 100
Impact The poster is self-
explanatory
Style The poster gives coherent
Subject Matter information
Creativity
Sub total Evaluation sheet for Vlog

Allocation of points Points
Opening video 20
Engegement to viewers
Emotion building 30
Originality 20
Technique
Adherence to the theme

Original idea 30
Narrative performance 100

45