5/2/2018 ACP Portfolio | Smore Newsletters
https://www.smore.com/95gqf 1/2
5/2/2018 ACP Portfolio | Smore Newsletters
https://www.smore.com/95gqf 2/2
5/2/2018 Table of Contents | Smore Newsletters
https://www.smore.com/0wynt-table-of-contents 1/2
5/2/2018 Table of Contents | Smore Newsletters
https://www.smore.com/0wynt-table-of-contents 2/2
What is the Adjunct Certification Program at Lone Star College?
Purpose: The purpose of the Adjunct Certification Program is to recognize and reward adjunct faculty who
make a commitment to the System and to provide an opportunity to enhance their teaching effectiveness.
Who can participate: Adjunct faculty who have taught at LSC for at least 2 semesters may apply. Participants
are chosen based upon recommendations from their department chair.
Course structure and objectives: The Adjunct Certification Program is structured around 5 components of
successful instruction. After successfully completing this program participants will be able to
Plan for Learning
o Create a syllabus snapshot
o Create a lesson using the BOPPPS lesson planning moel
o Write SMART lesson objectives
o Identify the levels in Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy
o Employ effective strategies to encourage students to prepare for class
Employ a Variety of Teaching Strategies
o Define teacher-centered, interactive, experiential, and independent learning techniques
o Locate online lesson repositories and resources
o Incorporate at least one new instructional strategy in a lesson plan
o Create questions that address various levels of Bloom's cognitive taxonomy
Assess Effectively
o Develop an assessment strategy that aligns with the course outcomes
o Utilize various formative assessment tools that are quick, engaging, and informative
o Create effective subjective and objective tools and processes.
o Cite the principles of effective evaluation.
o Develop an assessment rubric
Use Instructional Technology
o Explain how technology can enhance teaching and learning
o Employ at least one new instructional technology to encourage student engagement
o Locate instructional technology resources
Foster a Positive Learning Environment
o Utilize effective strategies for dealing with various student challenges
o Employ motivational theory to structure classes that foster student motivation to learn
In order to successfully complete the program, participants must:
• Attend ALL 5 face-to-face meetings with the initial cohort and complete all on-line lessons. This occurs
over a nine week period with a time commitment of 26-30 hours.
• Actively participate in online discussion topics.
• Present a 10 minute overview of a completely new lesson
• Complete a reflective essay
• Compile and submit an electronic portfolio of all completed assignments
• Score a minimum of 80% on all required elements of the course
Priscilla
Chastain
Student
Prep
Strategy
Since
my
students
are
learning
English
as
a
Second
Language,
it
is
very
common
for
vocabulary
to
be
unfamiliar
for
students.
We
often
assign
vocabulary
and
reading
logs
so
that
students
are
interacting
with
the
course
content
through
reading
and
learning
the
vocabulary.
Some
strategies
that
I
would
use
to
help
students
to
be
prepared
are
to
post
a
powerpoint
with
new
vocabulary
and
any
other
documents
that
would
be
related
to
the
reading
in
D2L.
In
class,
I
would
incorporate
a
game
like
Quizlet
Live.
This
game
requires
that
students
be
familiar
with
the
vocabulary
in
order
for
a
team
to
win.
The
students
love
this
game
and
the
encouragement
from
teammates
to
win
is
enough
to
make
students
want
to
be
prepared.
We
also
have
speaking
and
writing
assignments
over
the
content,
so
students
know
that
they
need
to
come
prepared
or
they
will
not
know
what
to
talk
about.
For
my
BOPPPS
lesson,
I
would
use
Padlet.
Warm up - Discussion: Have you ever
played a game where you needed to solve a mystery? If so, what were some skills that
helped you?
BOPPPS Lesson
Priscilla Chastain
Course: ESOL 0383 Oral Communications III
Lesson Title: Cluedo – Who did it?
Course Student Learning Outcome:
1. Listen to new information and summarize it; Listen to oral information and be
able to identify the main idea and important details.
Learning Objectives (these should be the ones you wrote in Module 1):
1. By the end of this lesson, students will be able to listen to oral information and
identify the main idea and
list important details.
2. By the end of this lesson, students will be able to summarize information that they heard.
Participatory Learning:
Time Instructor Activities Learner Activities Lesson
Materials
5-10 min Warm up - Discussion: Have you ever Padlet
played a game where you needed to
5-10 min Instructor Storytelling (Strategy) – solve a mystery? If so, what were some Teacher
Instructor presents the story of a skills that helped you? script;
recent (fictional) unsolved mystery Active Listening – Students can fill in Evidence
bank robbery. information on their “Evidence” form. form
This will include identifying where,
when, what, etc. concerning the crime.
5 min Instructor informs that all of the Student will choose a profession to Cards with
students were seen on video footage create their identity for the game. suggested
recovered by the police. Students can choose professions chosen professions
by the instructor or come up with their
own.
3-5 min Scaffolding – Instructor will read
15 min his/her alibi for the day of the crime.
35 min Instructor participates with group. Student Storytelling –Students will Alibi form
(depends write their personal “alibi” for the day Outlines
on size of of the crime based on the character that
group and they have created (or themselves).
Students are encouraged to “throw
shade” on other characters to create
doubt and cause suspicion.
Student Storytelling and
What/How/Why Outlines:
Students will share their alibis with
each other. Students can ask questions
questions) after the alibi statement is read. They
will write notes on the What/How/Why
5-10 min Outline to categorize information and Outlines
to look for discrepancies in statements.
10 min Evaluation and Judgment: Students Voting ballot
will evaluate their gathered information
10 min CAT – Feedback and form a judgment about who they Question
think is the bank robber. paper
1. According to the witness Voting and the Moment of Truth: Reflection
statements, in which city did the Students will vote for who they think is form
event take place? (Bloom’s Level 1 guilty, and our bank robber is revealed!
– Knowledge) Summary/Closure:
I will use some questions to assess how
a. Paris well students comprehended the
b. Lyon different parts of the activity.
c. Saint Malo
d. Bordeaux Then for homework, students will write
2. Describe in your own words, what a reflection about the activity: what
event took place. (Bloom’s Level 2 they liked; didn’t like; Do they feel
– Comprehension) their listening skills have
3. Compare and contrast two witness grown/improved? How could they have
statements. (Bloom’s Level 4 – prepared/performed better? How could
Analysis) I improve the lesson?
4. Who did you think was
guilty? Justify your answer in at
least four sentences. (Bloom’s Level
6 – Evaluation)
Cluedo
On November 12, there was a bank robbery. The bank robbery took place
at the Courte Bank in Bordeaux, France. Someone stole 500,000 euros!!!
The mayor of Bordeaux has promised to find the responsible person or
persons.
According to video surveillance footage, everyone in this room was also at
the bank on the day of November 12. As part of the investigation, you
must describe your entire day to us in order to convince us of your
innocence.
Remember to include even the smallest details…they could be essential in
removing doubts of your actions. Describe the weather, your profession,
your activities of that day, any other people that you may have noticed,
and especially tell us why you were at the bank that day and why you were
there that day.
Name:
Profession:
Your statement:
Name: Priscilla Chastain
Profession: French teacher
Your statement:
Hello, my name is Priscilla Chastain. I am a French teacher, so
it’s normal that I spend a lot of time in France. November 12th?
Let’s see…yes, I was in Bordeaux. I went to France to see some
friends and to buy some school supplies for my students. On
that morning, I woke up early and I ate breakfast at a café near
my hotel. It was raining because I remember that I had
forgotten my umbrella in my hotel room. After breakfast, I
found a bank because I needed to exchange some money. When
I arrived at the bank, I noticed that there were a lot of people
inside the bank. I stood in line for more than 30 minutes! I saw
a butcher, a florist, several students, a doctor, and a hairstylist.
I remember that the hairstylist seemed very suspicious. While
she was talking to me, she would look very quickly to her right
and then to her left every few minutes. It was so strange. And
she was wearing sandals. Can you imagine that? In November
when it was so cold! It was ridiculous! I also remember seeing a
soldier in line. He had his right hand in his pocket then entire
time like he was holding something. I was afraid that it was a
gun!
Useful Questions:
Did you see…?
Why did you say…?
Why did you do…?
Why did you go…?
I think that…
Was it…?
witness
guilty
Witness Statements
Witness #1
Witness #2
Witness #3 Witness #4
Witness #5 Witness #6
Witness #7 Witness #8
Witness #9 Witness #10
Witness #11 Witness #12
Witness #13 Witness #14
Witness #15
Priscilla
Chastain
Good
questions
Oral
Communication
III
Some
SLOs
for
this
course
are:
students
should
be
able
to
listen
to
a
recording
and
summarize
it;
talk
about
familiar
topics;
and
listen
to
get
the
main
idea
and
details.
By
the
end
of
this
lesson,
students
will
be
able
to
listen
to
a
short
recording
(or
speaking)
and
identify
the
main
idea
and
list
some
details.
By
the
end
of
this
lesson,
students
will
be
able
to
summarize
information
that
they
heard
in
a
short
recording
(or
speaking).
Questions
1.
According
to
the
witness
statements,
in
which
city
did
the
event
take
place?
(Bloom’s
Level
1
–
Knowledge)
a.
Paris
b.
Lyon
c.
Saint
Malo
d.
Bordeaux
2.
Describe
in
your
own
words,
what
event
took
place.
(Bloom’s
Level
2
-‐
Comprehension)
3.
Compare
and
contrast
two
witness
statements.
(Bloom’s
Level
4
–
Analysis)
4.
Who
did
you
think
was
guilty?
Justify
your
answer
in
at
least
four
sentences.
(Bloom’s
Level
6
–
Evaluation)
Fluency Pronunciation Vocabulary Grammar Details
and accent
5 Smooth and fluid speech; Excellent control of Accuracy & variety of Excellent level of
few to no hesitations; no Pronunciation is excellent; language features; a grammatical description; additional
attempts to search for good effort at accent wide range of well- structures
words; volume is chosen vocabulary details beyond the
required
excellent.
4 Smooth and fluid speech; Pronunciation is good; Good language control; Some errors in Good level of
few hesitations; a slight good effort at accent good range of relatively grammatical description; all required
search for words; well-chosen vocabulary
inaudible word or two. structures possibly information included
caused by attempt to
include a variety.
3 Speech is relatively Frequent grammatical
smooth; some hesitation
and unevenness caused Pronunciation is good; Adequate language errors that do not Adequate description;
by rephrasing and Some effort at accent, but control; vocabulary
searching for words; obscure meaning; some additional details
volume wavers. is definitely non-native range is lacking
little variety in should be provided
structures
2 Speech is frequently Pronunciation is okay; No Weak language control; Frequent grammatical Description lacks some
hesitant with some effort towards a native basic vocabulary choice errors even in simple critical details that make
sentences left accent with some words clearly it difficult for the listener
uncompleted; volume very structures that at
soft. lacking times obscure to understand
meaning.
Speech is slow, hesitant &
1 strained except for short Pronunciation is lacking Weak language control; Frequent grammatical Description is so lacking
memorized phrases; and hard to understand; vocabulary that is used errors even in simple that the listener cannot
difficult to perceive No effort towards a native does not match the task structures; meaning is
continuity in speech; understand
accent obscured.
inaudible.
ACP Showcase Portfolio
Priscilla Chastain
ESOL
April 21, 2018
ESOL 0383
Oral Communications III
English as a Second Language
Reading
Writing
Listening
Speaking
Course Student Learning Outcomes:
Listen to new information and summarize it.
Listen to oral information and be able to identify
the main idea and important details.
Student Preparation Strategy
Warm up - Discussion: Have you ever played a game where you needed to solve
a mystery? If so, what were some skills that helped you?
Technology
Bridge
Students will choose a profession (from a
list) to use to help create their identities in
the upcoming mystery.
Lesson Title: Cluedo – Who did it?
Learning Objectives:
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to listen
to oral information and identify the main idea and list
important details.
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to
summarize information that they heard.
Participatory Lesson
Instructor Storytelling – Instructor presents the story
of a recent (fictional) unsolved mystery bank robbery.
Active Listening – Students can fill in information on
their “Evidence” form. This will include identifying
where, when, what, etc. concerning the crime.
Instructor informs that all of the students were seen
on video footage recovered by the police.
Scaffolding – Instructor will read his/her alibi for the
day of the crime.
Participatory Lesson – cont.
Student Storytelling –Students will write their
personal “alibi” for the day of the crime based on the
character that they have created. Students are
encouraged to “throw shade” on other characters to
create doubt and cause suspicion.
Student Storytelling and What/How/Why outlines:
Students will share their alibis with each other.
Students should ask clarifying questions after the alibi
statement is read. They will write notes on the What/
How/Why outline to categorize information and to
look for discrepancies in statements.
Participatory Lesson – cont.
Evaluation and Judgment: Students will evaluate their
gathered information and form a judgment about who
they think is the bank robber.
Voting and the Moment of Truth: Students will vote
for who they think is guilty, and our bank robber is
revealed!
Post-Assessment
Summary/Closure: I will use some questions to assess how well students
comprehended the different parts of the activity.
CAT – Feedback
1. According to the witness statements, in which city did the event take
place? (BL 1 – Knowledge) a) Paris b) Lyon c) Saint Malo d)
Bordeaux
2. Describe in your own words, what event took place. (Bloom’s Level 2 –
Comprehension)
3. Compare and contrast two witness statements. (Bloom’s Level 4 –
Analysis)
4. Who did you think was guilty? Justify your answer in at least four
sentences. (Bloom’s Level 6 – Evaluation)
Student Reflection
For homework, students will write a reflection about
the activity: what they liked; didn’t like; Do they feel
their listening skills have grown/improved? How could
they have prepared/performed better? How could the
lesson be improved?
Personal Reflection on My ACP Experience
In June, I will be finishing up my 19th school year as a teacher.
As you can imagine, I have attended a lot of professional
development over the years. However, when I first heard of the
ACP program, I was really interested since I am fairly new to
Lone Star. Since I have spent the majority of my career in
education, it has been very interesting to learn from those of
you who have had other careers and now are teaching. You
bring fresh and varied experiences to the classroom. I have also
really enjoyed engaging in our collegial discussions. One of my
mottos is that I always want to keep learning. How can I
encourage my students to be lifelong learners if I am not doing
the same thing? It has been great to learn with and from all of
you.
Resources – Instructor Storytelling script
On November 12, there was a bank robbery. The bank robbery took
place at the Courte Bank in Bordeaux, France. Someone stole 500,000
euros!!! The mayor of Bordeaux has promised to find the responsible
person or persons.
According to video surveillance footage, everyone in this room was also
at the bank on the day of November 12. As part of the investigation,
you must describe your entire day to us in order to convince us of your
innocence.
Remember to include even the smallest details…they could be essential
in removing doubts of your actions. Describe the weather, your
profession, your activities of that day, any other people that you may
have noticed, and especially tell us why you were at the bank that day
and why you were there that day.
Resources – Scaffolding instructor alibi
Name: Priscilla Chastain Profession: French teacher
Your statement: Hello, my name is Priscilla Chastain. I am a French teacher, so
it’s normal that I spend a lot of time in France. November 12th?
Let’s see…yes, I was in Bordeaux. I went to France to see some friends and to buy
some school supplies for my students. On that morning, I woke up early and I ate
breakfast at a café near my hotel. It was raining because I remember that I had
forgotten my umbrella in my hotel room. After breakfast, I found a bank because I
needed to exchange some money. When I arrived at the bank, I noticed that there
were a lot of people inside the bank. I stood in line for more than 30 minutes! I
saw a butcher, a florist, several students, a doctor, and a hairstylist. I remember
that the hairstylist seemed very suspicious. While she was talking to me, she would
look very quickly to her right and then to her left every few minutes. It was so
strange. And she was wearing sandals. Can you imagine that? In November when
it was so cold! It was ridiculous! I also remember seeing a soldier in line. He had
his right hand in his pocket then entire time like he was holding something. I was
afraid that it was a gun!
My
Experience
with
Lone
Star’s
Adjunct
Certification
Program
Priscilla
Chastain
In
June,
I
will
be
finishing
up
my
19th
school
year
as
a
teacher.
As
you
can
imagine,
I
have
attended
a
lot
of
professional
development
over
the
years.
However,
when
I
first
heard
of
the
ACP
program,
I
was
really
interested
in
participating
because
I
am
fairly
new
to
Lone
Star.
Since
I
have
spent
the
majority
of
my
career
in
education,
it
was
very
interesting
to
learn
from
the
fellow
students
who
have
had
other
careers
and
now
are
teaching.
I
found
that
they
brought
fresh
and
varied
experiences
to
the
classroom.
I
have
also
really
enjoyed
engaging
in
our
collegial
discussions.
One
of
my
mottos
is
that
I
always
want
to
keep
learning.
How
can
I
encourage
my
students
to
be
lifelong
learners
if
I
am
not
doing
the
same
thing?
It
has
been
great
to
learn
with
and
from
all
of
the
participants.
I
feel
that
the
Adjunct
Certification
Program
has
been
a
valuable
experience.
I
think
that
it
has
helped
me
to
reflect
on
what
my
current
practices
were
and
to
learn
some
new
ones.
First
of
all
in
this
program,
we
talked
about
the
BOPPPS
lesson
plan.
Although
I
have
used
different
types
of
lesson
plans
and
lesson
planning
strategies
in
the
past,
this
was
a
new
experience
for
me.
We
went
through
the
different
parts
of
it
and
started
creating
our
own
sample
lesson.
This
process
was
insightful
as
to
best
practices
for
the
college
student.
We
also
talked
about
Bloom’s
Taxonomy
and
practiced
creating
questions
using
the
specific
words
from
BT
that
encourage
higher
order
thinking
skills.
Next,
we
created
rubrics
to
go
along
with
our
BOPPPS
lesson.
Then,
we
learned
about
different
technology
tools
and
incorporated
them
into
our
lesson.
Finally,
we
presented
over
the
experience
to
each
other.
I
feel
that
going
through
this
process
has
made
me
a
more
effective
instructor
because
it
has
caused
me
to
study
my
current
systems
and
plans
and
to
incorporate
the
elements
of
the
BOPPPS
lesson
into
my
lesson
planning.
Through
our
discussions
over
the
readings
from
the
class,
it
has
also
helped
me
to
better
understand
college
level
students.
In
addition
to
incorporating
the
BOPPPS
lesson
into
my
lesson
planning,
I
have
purposely
challenged
myself
to
use
more
of
the
higher
order
thinking
language
from
Bloom’s
Taxonomy.
Also,
I
have
included
some
of
the
new
technology
that
we
learned
about
in
class.
Finally,
I
feel
that
ACP
has
helped
me
to
be
a
more
integrated
part
of
Lone
Star.
I
have
met
and
collaborated
with
colleagues
from
across
many
fields.
It
was
also
interesting
to
learn
about
different
classes
through
the
sample
lessons
that
my
associates
presented.
This
has
truly
been
an
enriching
experience.
My
suggestion
for
further
professional
development
would
be
to
make
this
program
available
for
every
new
adjunct.
Although
starting
at
a
new
place
as
an
adjunct
can
be
challenging
and
you
don’t
have
a
lot
of
spare
time,
I
feel
that
this
program
would
be
very
beneficial
to
someone
who
is
brand
new
to
Lone
Star.
In
closing,
I
would
like
to
say
that
I
truly
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
have
been
part
of
this
cohort.
Our
instructor
was
extremely
knowledgeable.
She
is
a
great
resource
to
other
instructors
because
she
is
compassionate
and
she
brings
a
range
of
experiences
to
the
class.