GROUP MEMBERS GROUP MEMBERS 1 ELINA SOFEA BINTI FAIRUS FARID 300759 2 VALERIE ABBYGAIL ANAK LISTER 300798 3 AMIR RAFIQ BIN ABDUL HALIM 297734 4 AINA NAWWARAH BINTI BORHAN 297306 5 TAN JIA YI 297369 6 MOHANA LAKSHIMI A/P MUNUSAMY 297427 7 WISESA RAFFI ABRAR 297036 8 IDZHAN ARIEF BIN MOHD AZUDDIN 297261 9 MAVITIRAA A/P VIJAYAROOBAN 301470 10 NURUL HASSANAH BINTI MD HUSHAIMI 299682
TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction - Overview of Park Geun-Hye’s Corruption Allegation -Purpose of the Case Study Biography Of Park Geun Hye -Background information on Park Geun Hye -Park Geun Hye's rise to power Historical and Political Context -South Korean Political Landscape - Key Policies and Initiatives during Park Geun-Hye Presidency Corruption Allegations - Introduction to the Corruption Allegations - Key Figures and Entities Involved -Timeline of the events - Media and Public Perception Investigation And Legal Proceedings -Government Response to the Allegations - Investigative Bodies and Their Findings - Legal Proceedings and Court Trials Impact On South Korea -Political Consequences -Social and Public Reactions -Economic Repercussions Lessons Learned - Implications for the Fight Against Corruption - Reforms and Changes in South Korea's Political Landscape -International Perspectives and Cooperation Conclusion References
INTRODUCTION 01 Overview of Park Geun-Hye’s Corruption Allegation Purposes South Korea's first female president, Park Geun Hye, was embroiled in a massive corruption scandal that rocked South Korea in 2016. The results of the case led to her impeachment and imprisonment. The allegations centred on his relationship with his close friend, Choi Soon-Sil. The scandal is about Park Geun Hye's close relationship with her old friend Choi Soon Sil. Choi Soon Sil is accused of having used her relationship with the president to interfere in state affairs, even though she does not hold any official government position. In addition, Park Geun-Hye is also facing accusations of abusing her presidential power. This is because she has allowed Choi Soon-Sil access to confidential government documents and exerts undue influence on policy decisions. Additionally, Choi SoonSil has used her influence and been accused of embezzlement. She has asked for large donations from South Korean conglomerates (chaebols), including Samsung, Lotte and SK, for two foundations she controls. Although Park Geun-Hye remains innocent, the scandal remains an important event in South Korean history. This is also an important and clear reminder of the importance of fighting corruption in government. The purpose of the case study is to spread awareness about alleged corruption. This can open people's minds about the complexity of corruption allegations, the importance of transparency, while also examining the potential consequences of political scandals and the impact on democratic institutions and the need for active citizen involvement in corruption prevention efforts.
Background information on Park Geun Hye Park Geun Hye was born on 2 February 1952 in Daegu, South Korea. She was born into a political family with deep roots in Korean politics. She is the eldest daughter of the president, Park Chung Hee. Her father, Park Chung Hee, is one of South Korea's most controversial presidents. He overthrew Syngman Rhee in a military coup and served as South Korea's president from 1963 to 1979. Under the leadership of Park Chung Hee, South Korea achieved industrialization and brought rapid economic growth. However, Koreans still think that Park Chung Hee was a dictator. Before the age of 22, Park Geun Hye's life was not much different from the other normal girls. Although she is the daughter of the President of South Korea, Park Geun Hye did not enjoy a lot of creature comforts due to her strict upbringing. (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018) ~BIOGRAPHY~ Park Geun Hye's early life was filled with tragedy. On 15 August 1974, during a commemoration event, Park Chung Hee’s wife Yook Young Soo was shot and killed by North Korean Mun Se Gwang. Park Geun Hye lost her mother in that incident. She urgently interrupted her studies in France and returned to Korea at that time. From then on, Park Geun Hye began to act as the "First Lady" in Korea. She was involved in various social and diplomatic responsibilities and won the favour of the Korean people. She slowly became more and more involved in her father's political activities and started to show her style in politics. (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018) Park Geun Hye Park Chung Hee (Father) Yook Young Soo (Mother) On 26 October 1979, Park Chung Hee was assassinated by the director of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency (KCIA). This incident has brought violent political turmoil. After the death of Park Chung Hee, Park Geun Hye chose to stay away from politics and withdrew from public life. The death of her father has a huge effect on Park Geun-hye. Unknown spots appeared on her body and no doctor could diagnose them. Park Geun Hye mentioned that pain is a human attribute, it can prove that people are still alive in her diary in 1981. She gave up marriage due to the special circumstances of her family. (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018)
As the daughter of Park Chung Hee, perhaps politics is Park Geun Hye’s destiny. She said that she has no parents, no husband, no children. The country is the only one she hopes to serve. In the late 1990s, South Korea experienced a financial crisis. People started to think about the rapid development of the Park Chung Hee era. At this time, Park Geun Hye returned to the public eye. She initially entered politics as a member of the opposition party and represented the conservative Grand National Party. In 2004, Park Geun Hye became the president of the Grand National Party. During the local elections in May 2006, Park Geun Hye was attacked by an unknown man with a stationery knife and the right side of her face was cut. After this incident, the Korean media began to call Park Geun Hye as the woman who married South Korea. (Press, 2006) RISETO POWER On 19 December 2012, Park Geun Hye successfully won the 18th presidential election in South Korea. She is the first female president in South Korea's history. Park Geun Hye's presidency faces many challenges. On 16 April 2014, a major shipwreck occurred in South Korea, the sinking of the South Korean "Sewol". This accident caused a total of 304 deaths and the majority were middle school students. In this incident, the South Korean government exposed problems such as bureaucracy, concealment of facts and shirk of responsibility. After this accident, Park Geun Hye, the president of South Korea, did not respond in time and mysteriously disappeared for seven hours. This has brought great doubt to Park Geun Hye's ability to govern a country. She lost the trust of the people (Lee, 2018). won the 18th presidential election knife attack on Park Geun Hye
The 2016 Korean political scandal, also known as the Park Geun Hye and Choi Soon Sil Gate, was the event that led to the downfall of Park Geun Hye's political career. Choi Soon Sil has no formal government power, but she used Park Geun Hye's authority to arrange for her daughter to enter South Korea's Ewha Womans University. This incident has attracted great attention in South Korea. After South Korea's prosecutor's office intervened in this incident, they discovered that Choi Soon Sil not only used Park Geun Hye's authority but was also involved in many government decisions. She used the name of the presidential office to blackmail various Korean companies. Korean companies such as Samsung, Lotte and Hyundai Motor need to “donate” large amounts of cash to Choi Soon Sil. Even Park Geun Hye's speeches were drafted by Choi Soon Sil. Park Geun Hye is like a puppet to Choi Soon Sil. To put it simply, the “surface” president of South Korea is Park Geun Hye, but the "actual” president is Choi Soon Sil (BBC News, 2018). This incident led to the end of Park Geun Hye's political career and brought the impeachment case of Park Geun Hye. END OF POLITICAL CAREER the sinking of the South Korean "Sewol" the Park Geun Hye and Choi Soon Sil Gate the impeachment case of Park Geun Hye
. South Korean Political Landscape According to International Credit Agricole Group ( 2023 ), the political environment in South Korea is energetic and multifaceted, with a mix of conventional and modern political education. Since 1948, the law framework of the country has experienced different shifts, such as the military and dictatorship, until it settled within the 1990s. Under the authority of President Moon Jae-in, the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) has ruled the nation since 2017. A centre-left party, the DPK underpins financial changes as well as social welfare programs. The United Future Party (UFP), formerly known as The People Power Party ,is the opposition party. It contains a history of dictatorship and inclines towards preservationist values. The authoritative department of government has a 300- member National Gathering, which is chosen by a corresponding representation framework. Since it is autonomous, the law has been pivotal in making untrustworthy authorities liable. Moreover, the economy of South Korea is intensely centred on economical trades and advancement. The country has international relations with major powers like China, Japan, and the United States as a result of its geopolitical position as a vital player in East Asia. Tourism and mainstream entertainment, like Korean dramas and pop culture, are South Korea's two main sources of economic power. Historical and Political Context Moreover, South Korea has gotten to be a pioneer in combating climate change and progressing economical advancement in later a long time. The nation's reaction to the COVID-19 widespread has gotten appreciation for its capacity to control the virus's spread while causing the slightest sum of financial hardship. In general , the political scene of South Korea is characterised by a devotion to popular government, financial development, and soundness inside the locale, whereas at the same time tending to issues like populace maturing, disparity, and geopolitical pressures.
During her time as president, Park Geun Hye has proposed a few alternatives. The progression of renewable vitality sources was also given best by Park's organisation, which aimed to raise the extent of renewables within the nation's vitality blend to 20% by 2030. This technique has supported South Korea's endeavours to battle climate change and reduced the nation's dependence on imported fossil fuels. Furthermore, an assortment of social welfare activities, counting raising the minimum wage and expanding healthcare scope, were carried out by Park's organisation. The objectives of these activities were to decrease pay difference and increment low-income families' social mobility. According to Korea Joongang Daily ( 2023 ) , the living costs in South Korea have risen swiftly . For example, starting on February 1 2023 , the base fare for taxis in Seoul will rise by 1,000 won to 4,800 won ($3.9). To sum it up, Stop Geun-Hye's administration was checked by an accentuation on social welfare, financial development, and advancement, with a centre on highlighting South Korea's administration in renewable vitality and innovation. Key Policies and Initiatives during Park Geun-HyePresidency
Corruption Allegations The corruption case against Park Geun-Hye, the former President of South Korea, was marked by a number of serious accusations. Each one made people less trusting of the government's top levels (“Park Geun-Hye: South Korea’s Ex-Leader Jailed for 24 Years for Corruption,” 2018). The main four accusations were influence peddling, embezzlement, abuse of power and favouritism. The first accusation was influence peddling. It means using your power in government or links with people in power to get favours or special treatment for someone else, usually in exchange for money. People said that Park Geun-Hye gave her close friend Choi Soon-sil too much power over state business, even though Choi Soon-sil didn't have a job with the government. Other than that, Choi Soon-sil was charged with embezzlement because she used her relationship with President Park Geun-Hye to steal money. She was charged with forcing big South Korean companies like Samsung and Lotte to give her large amounts of money. It is said that these funds were sent to foundations and organisations managed by Choi, which is not what they were meant to do (“Park Geun-Hye: South Korea’s Ex-Leader Jailed for 24 Years for Corruption,” 2018). This made people worry about using company resources for personal gain, and it brought up the idea of corruption where government and business interests meet. Choi is said to have manipulated government policies and taken part in important decision-making processes as part of this influence trading (Haas, 2018). This news seriously hurt the idea of open government and made people wonder about the honesty of the people making decisions in the administration.
The accusations of abuse of power were mostly about how President Park Geun-Hye was said to have abused her presidential power . People said she helped Choi Soon-sil get money from big businesses, which gave the impression that the government was forcing Choi to do things and showing favouritism (Haas, 2018). The charges of abuse of power brought to light a breach of public trust and the high standards of ethics that people expect from the top office in the land. There were also claims of cronyism in the case, especially when it came to high-level government positions. Cronyism means favouring only friends and companions for every job, and patronage means that the party in power only puts their friends and family in high roles and not lower ones. It was said that Choi Soon-sil had a hand in choosing important government officials and advisors (Hahm & Heo, 2017). This made people worry about how fair and unbiased the administration's decision-making processes were. These accusations, which were made public by investigative journalism, were a major cause of widespread public outrage, large-scale protests, and eventually Park Geun-Hye's impeachment, removal from office, and subsequent legal proceedings (South Korea Pardons Jailed Former President Park Geun-Hye, 2021). In high-level politics, keeping openness, responsibility, and moral leadership are hard things to do. This case shows how hard it can be.
KEY FIGURES AND ENTITIES INVOLVED Choi Soon-sil, who has been Park Geun-Hye's friend and confidante for a long time, was a key figure in the graft claims (Haas, 2018). She was accused of taking advantage of her personal relationship with the President to make money by working as an unpaid adviser and having too much power over government business. Choi Soon-sil was accused of stealing money and using his power to get other people to do what he wanted, especially when he tried to get money from big South Korean companies (Hahm & Heo, 2017). The corruption claims were based on these important people and groups and how their relationships and claimed illegal activities were linked (South Korea Pardons Jailed Former President Park Geun-Hye, 2021). When the truth about what they did came out, it caused a lot of anger, protests, and judicial problems that changed the course of South Korean political history. In the corruption case involving Park Geun-Hye, the former President of South Korea, important people and groups were at the centre of the accusations, and their roles were very important in the story as it grew. In the middle of the trouble was Park Geun-Hye, who was President at the time of the claims (“Park Geun-Hye: South Korea’s Ex-Leader Jailed for 24 Years for Corruption,” 2018). She was accused of giving her close friend Choi Soon-sil too much power over state business, which led to charges of power abuse, influence selling, and theft. Thanks to her close ties to Choi Soon-sil, Park Geun-Hye found herself at the centre of probes, and what she did as president was closely watched. Samsung and Lotte, two of the biggest companies in South Korea, were linked to the corruption scam. Some people said that these companies gave large amounts of money to Choi Soon-sil-connected groups and foundations in exchange for business and political favours. Corporate leaders from these big companies were found guilty in the scandal and given jail terms (Hahm & Heo, 2017).
The Choi Soon-sil scandal was the catalyst for her presidency's demise. Despite holding no formal government post, Choi, Park's close friend, was discovered to have substantial influence over the president. According to reports, Choi acquired secret materials and utilised her friendship with Park for personal advantage, including extorting money from large corporations. This controversy sparked enormous protests throughout South Korea, with millions calling for Park's resignation. In December 2016, the National Assembly impeached her, accusing her of constitutional and criminal crimes. Her impeachment was upheld by the Constitutional Court in March 2017, ending her presidency and initiating legal action against her. The arrest of Park Geun-hye and the trials that followed were widely publicised. She was charged with official secret leaks, coercion, abuse of power, and bribery. Her trials sparked outrage from the public by exposing a maze of corruption and collaboration between South Korea's ruling class and private enterprises. . TIMELINE OF THEEVENTS TIMELINE OF THEEVENTS Due to her political history, Park Geun-hye's administration was initially met with great hopes. She was the daughter of Park Chung-hee, a former South Korean president noted for his authoritarian leadership but also credited with encouraging the country's fast economic development. However, Park Geun-hye's administration was marred by severe obstacles and scandals. The Sewol ferry catastrophe in April 2014 was a terrible occurrence that had a significant influence on her government. The public's fury and condemnation of the government's handling of the catastrophe, particularly the rescue operations and apparent incompetence, had a considerable impact on Park Geun-hye's popularity. The Sewol ferry sank, killing 304 people, the majority of whom were school children.The toll is ascribed to the Park government's reluctance to respond fast. (Park, 2019) In April 2018, Park was convicted guilty of many crimes and given a 24-year prison sentence. In January 2021, her sentence was reduced to 20 years when the Supreme Court ordered a retrial. This case has significant ramifications for South Korean politics, drawing attention to issues with power dynamics between politicians and influential figures outside the government, political leader accountability, and corruption. It also sparked discussions on modernising the legal and political systems of the nation to prevent future occurrences of this kind. A significant development in South Korean politics is still the Park Geun-hye issue
Media and Public Perception A network of corruption and influence-peddling at the highest levels of authority was exposed by the Park Geun-hye scandal, which rocked South Korea. The media dutifully described the complex connections between Park and Choi Soon-sil, emphasising Choi's unapproved participation in governmental matters. According to a number of news outlets, Choi possessed access to private government records and data and his use of this link for personal benefit. (Lee, 2018) Massive demonstrations that repeated calls for accountability and structural reform were the result of this revelation, which stoked widespread public ire and disappointment. There were heated discussions over the unbridled power that people in positions of authority wielded after the scandal shattered public confidence in political leadership and institutions. It prompted journalists to pause and consider their profession's ethical principles as well as their duty to report politics impartially. The controversy was about more than simply one leader's fall from grace; it was about a more transparent, accountable, and morally grounded political system. This disagreement affected society profoundly and went beyond band-aid solutions. People began actively participating in shaping the destiny of their country, which resulted in a revival of civic engagement. The Park Geun-hye affair was not just about a few bad apples; it was also the impetus for a bigger anti-corruption movement and a call to action for structural reforms. It emphasized how important it is for citizens to be involved in maintaining the integrity of democratic institutions.
Government Response to the Allegations In response to the serious allegations of corruption and abuse of power against Park Geun- hye, the South Korean government shouldered a multifaceted and rigorous approach. Investigative bodies, including a special prosecutor's office, were established to completely examine the charges surrounding Park Geun- hye's involvement in a high- profile corruption reproach. The findings of these examinations revealed a complex network of corruption and influencepeddling, entwining the former chairman and her close confidant, Choi Soon- sil. The government's response was decisive, with the National Assembly advancing for Park Geunhye's indictment in December 2016, and the indigenous Court upholding this decision in March 2017, performing in her junking from office. posterior legal proceedings led to her conviction on charges of bribery, abuse of power, and compulsion, pressing the government's commitment to addressing corruption at the loftiest situations of power. This instance not only highlighted the South Korean government's commitment to maintaining the integrity of the legal system but also conveyed a strong message about the repercussions of corruption in political spheres. The decisive response underscored a dedication to accountability, transparency, and the protection of democratic institutions. In addressing a scandal that had significantly unsettled the foundations of the country's governance, the government actively worked to rebuild public trust. InvestigationAnd Legal Proceedings
Investigative Bodies and Their Findings The probe into the alleged corruption and abuse of power by Park Geun-hye engaged various pivotal investigative entities in South Korea. A key actor in this effort was the special prosecutor's office, established explicitly to undertake a thorough examination of the allegations against the former president. Investigative teams delved deeply into intricate details surrounding Park Geun-hye's association with Choi Soon-sil, her close confidante, scrutinising a spectrum of accusations encompassing corruption, influence-peddling, and embezzlement. The findings of these investigative bodies revealed a complex web of corruption that intertwined Park Geunhye in a reproach of unknown scale. Central to the allegations was the accusation that major conglomerates, including Samsung, were constrained into making substantial fiscal benefactions to foundations controlled by Choi Soon- sil. These benefactions were seen as bribes aimed at securing favourable treatment from the government. Also, the investigations exposed the extent of Choi Soon- sil's influence over the presidency, as she was found to have been involved in critical decision- making processes and had access to classified information.
The capstone of these findings led to nippy and poignant governmental responses. The National Assembly voted for Park Geun- hye's indictment in December 2016, and the indigenous Court upheld this decision in March 2017, officially removing her from office. posterior legal proceedings resulted in her conviction on charges of bribery, abuse of power, and compulsion. The examinations and their findings underlined the South Korean government's commitment to addressing corruption at the loftiest situations and maintaining the integrity of popular institutions. The case had profound counter accusations for political responsibility, translucency, and the ongoing fight against corruption in the country.
The legal proceedings and court trials involving Park Geun- hye, the former President of South Korea, constituted a significant chapter in the fate of a corruption reproach that resulted in her indictment. Following her junking from office in 2017, Park Geun- hye faced charges related to bribery, abuse of power, and compulsion. These allegations centred on her involvement in a high- profile corruption scheme with her close confidant, Choi Soon- sil. The court trials unfolded in the Central District Court of Seoul, furnishing a platform for the donation of evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments. In April 2018, Park Geunhye was found guilty on multiple charges, including bribery and abuse of power, leading to a substantial captivity judgement and significant forfeitures. This legal outgrowth underlined the graveness of the charges and stressed the South Korean judicial system's commitment to upholding the rule of law. The legal proceedings against Park Geun- hye were a pivotal element in South Korean political history, demonstrating the nation's fidelity to responsibility and translucency, indeed at the loftiest situations of government. The trials emphasised the significance of holding individualities in positions of power responsible for acts of corruption or abuse, contributing to broader sweatshops to maintain the integrity of popular institutions in the country. Legal Proceedings and Court Trials
IMPACTONSOUTHKOREA POLITICALCONSEQUENCES First and foremost, Park Geun Hye case led to the political instability in South Korea. Herouster as president created huge public protests, with millions heading to the streets, demonstrating the populace's aversion to political corruption and misuse of power. In this context, on 25 October 2016 Park Geun Hye apologised publicly due to her action of asking a help from her friend, Choi Soon Sil regarding public relation issue such as throughout her president campaign in 2012 and following her swearing-in in 2013 but it was seen as insincere and fake, resulting in the first candlelight demonstration. It can be seen that almost 20000 people protested outside the Blue House. Next, the public uproar had increased to a thunderous roar of over 1 million protestors, As this led to the not overlooked by the South Korean National Assembly as well as a bill to impeach president Park was present (Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, 2018). Moving on, Park Geun Hye's controversy resulted in an election and a change in power. South Koreans need to re-elect for their 19th president that was held on May 9, following Park Geun hye's impeachment.This is due to the fact that elections that can be considered as special cases needs to be held within 60 days of removal. Some of the candidates included Moon Jae-in from Democratic Party, Hong Jun-pyo from Liberty Korea Party, Ahn Cheol-soo from People's Party, and many more.As a result from the election, Moon Jae In won most of the votes that lead to his win for the election. This incident made him the 19th South Korea President. Moon's triumph was predicted as people started to reject Park Geun Hye’s administration. Despite that, there are still some of the provinces which are Daegu and Kyungsang that are still supporting President Park. As a result, Moon Jae-In didn't manage to conquer those provinces but somehow Moon Jae-In still won other provinces along with important cities. He managed to receive 41% of the vote. As Park Geun-hye was no longer in office and an interim president was in charge of the government, Moon straight away straight away took over as president. This incident happened on 10 of May and he was sworn in by the National Assembly the same day (Uk Heo & Seongyi Yun, 2018). Finally, in terms of political significance, this case had an impact on political parties. Park Geun-hye's impeachment has far-reaching consequences for her political party, the Saenuri Party which after that was renamed as Liberty Korea Party. The scandal shattered the party and ruined public support for it. It struggled to distance itself from Park's soiled reputation, resulting in internal conflicts and a loss of respect among voters.According to The Straits Times (2017), South Korea's troubled ruling party has chosen its new name which is Liberal Korea Party that officially announced on Thursday, 9 February, as it strives to distinguish itself from a major corruption scandal. "We've agreed to change the party name to the Liberal Korea Party with an appeal that it will be formed anew." (Auto H, 2017)
SOCIAL&PUBLICREACTION Polarisation and societal divide were also brought up by the chaos following Park Geun-hye's impeachment. The splits resulted from different interpretations of the incident; one group criticised the misuse of power and corruption, while the other group continued to support Park Geun-hye, considering her positively due to personal ties or loyalty to her political beliefs.It is evident that the 20% of people who oppose the president's impeachment are mostly those in their 60s and older. Their point of view is that the investigation of the president, Park Geun Hye, is mostly based on gossip and unproven accusations (Nilsson-Wright, 2017). Also according to Nilsson-Wright (2017), Park Geun Hye supporters said, the campaign against Ms. Park is an attack on the achievements of Park Chung-hee, a father of President Park and also a dictator who brought the miraculous turnaround of the Han River, which quickly boosted the economy of South Korea to become the fourth-largest in Asia. In South Korea, the Park Geun-hye scandal prompted an unexpected wave of civic action and public engagement. Lots of Korean people assembled in candlelight protest demanded not just impeachment, but also fundamental transformation of society in response to concerns like poor development, disparities, an ageing population, and the threat of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution (Kim, HoKi, 2016). Furthermore,some of South Koreans protest in Seoul in order to demand President Park Geun-hye's removal, as a crisis arose amid suspicions that a friend had excessive authority over her and interfered in state matters.Prosecutors are investigating presidential aides and other officials to see if they violated the law by allowing Park's friend, Choi Soon-sil, to have excessive power and earn financially (Jack Kim, 2016). "It's become obvious the people made the wrong choice to vote for the wrong president," one protester stated (Jeong Hong-woo, 2016). The South Korean Park Geun-hye controversy highlighted the critical role that the media plays in exposing wrongdoing and maintaining information transparency. Investigative journalism has become an effective force for exposing the intricate layers of corruption and power abuse at the highest levels of government. Moon (2018) has emphasised in great detail how media outlets actively followed up on leads, carried out in-depth investigations, and discovered crucial information that was essential to the case. As a result, it is essential for journalist to show their integrity in order to prove the importance of free press. Thus public leader’s responsibility and political transparency may be maintained. Furthermore, the media’s role in reporting is not only regarding wrongdoing. But also about fostering a democratic process in which leaders are held responsible and individuals are empowered with important information. Both of these have significance in the democratic process. Last but not least, the case highlighted the need of media as monitor in order to ensure transparency and ethical governance in South Korea.
ECONOMICREPERCUSSIONS The corruption scandal, which engulfed the former President of Korea Park GeunHye, has an important impact on the economy. This issue has given rise to events leading to changes in the country's trajectory, which have provided a basis for introspection and institutional reform. The year 2016 brought global political change, and the last few months of that year were characterized by significant turmoil. Assembly on December 9th after weeks of mass protests. On December 9th, President Park Geun Hye was expelled from office by South Korean parliament following weeks of public protests. On January 3, 2017 the first hearing for the trial was to be held.One of the main reasons for this indictment was Park's special relationship with Choi SoonSil, a friend who had been accused of using her closeness to the Chairman in order to receive financial benefits. Despite having no sanctioned position in the government, Choi managed to influence policy decisions and use presidential approval to pressurize some of the country's largest family-owned conglomerates, known as chaebols, such as Samsung, to donate millions of dollars to her foundations. In particular Indonesia and Thailand, where many large conglomerates have developed corrupt relationships with governments, the model of corruption has been extended in Southeast Asia. These governments use payments from these corporations to maintain political support and enrich themselves. The indictment of Park and Choi sparked significant anger across the country, leading to widespread inquiries. However, some experts believe indicting Park could benefit the country in the long run. Professor Choi BaeGeun of Konkuk University's Department of Economics believes it could be a significant step towards eventuallyclearing South Korea of political threats. According to Choi, advancing against the indictment would have meant that Park continued to hold power, and political threats would have continued to exist, burdening the country's economy. If the charge materialises, many Koreans will hope there will be more transparency within the chaebol corporations operating in a commercial terrain devoid of public scrutiny. The public anger during the protests was directed mainly at the chaebols, and the indictment could bring Lee Jae-Myung to power. He is willing to break up the family-owned empires and limit their ability. Other factors besides Park's indictment will likely affect South Korea's growth prospects. For example, with the US Federal Reserve raising interest rates in December and anticipating to do so again, mounting pressure is set to be exerted on the country's import-driven economy. Exports constitute nearly half of Korea's gross domestic product. With US rate hikes likely to induce a stronger dollar and capital outflows from countries that South Korea depends on, such as China and Latin America, the resulting drop in import earnings could significantly dent the nation's growth performance. The impact could be severe since rising agriculture makes up 57.1 percent of Korea's total import business between January and October, according to Korea International Trade Association data.
South Korea’s high minister, Hwang Kyo- ahn, who was appointed acting chairman after the public assembly’s indictment vote, will continue in that party until the election. On May 9, Moon Jae- in was elected South Korea’s new president, and his first superintendent order established a commission to produce jobs and combat structural inequality. This was because these issues — not North Korean missiles fueled the downtime 2017 revolution. Yet politicians and media around the world, especially in the United States, are eager to make his election about North Korea. Someone Googling “ Korea ” will find a lot about ballistic missiles and militancy, but little about what's maybe the most significant time in South Korea’s history. transnational captions incontinently following Moon’s induction suspected about his possible “anti-Americanism ” or “pro-North ” leanings. He has tried not to take the bait, promising both a “ bold new vision ” for peace in Korea and to stand “ shoulder- to- shoulder ” with the United States. The reality moment is that utmost South Koreans — especially those in their twenties and thirties, who face among the loftiest youth severance rates in any rich nation — simply don't want to bear the fiscal burden of making the two countries one again, and nearly no bone is romantic enough to believe that both sides will lay down arms at the border and grasp. The corruption scandal involving Park Geun-hye, the former President of South Korea, had a significant implications for South Korea's global image. The scandal, which came to out to light in 2016, had led to Park's impeachment and removal from office. The political stability in South Korea has also been the subject of concern due to the scandal. This has hurt South Korea's reputation all over the world. The scandal received widespread international media coverage, and the perception of corruption at the highest levels of government could have undermined the country's image as a stable and transparent nation. The impeachment of a sitting president due to corruption charges suggested issues with the country's political system and governance. South Korea's political system must recover and contribute to rebuilding its society after the downfall of President Park. Millions of residents assembled in candlelight rallies demanded not only impeachment, but also structural reform of society in response to concerns like poor growth, inequality, an ageing society, and the threat of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. The majority considers inequality to be the most pressing issue on which extraordinary economic and social reforms will be required to erase inequality. South Korea must elect a new president within 60 days at a time of wide wrathfulness at the state of the frugality, and the influence applied by its political and artificial elites. The agreement among the original media is that choosers will elect her successor on 9 May.
Implications for the Fight Against Corruption Park Geun-hye’s case significantly influenced the political landscape by highlighting how political leaders can exploit their positions for personal gain, compromising the principles of transparency and accountability. For example, Park was accused of allowing her close friend, Choi Soon-sil, to exert undue influence over state affairs, including decisions on policy and appointments (Doucette, 2017). This highlighted the susceptibility of political systems to corruption when leaders prioritise personal interests over public welfare. Furthermore, the case sparked a substantial public outcry, illustrating the vital role of an engaged civil society in holding leaders accountable. Massive protests erupted across South Korea, with millions taking to the streets to demand Park's resignation and express their dissatisfaction with corruption in the government (Euny, 2017, as cited in Doucette, 2017). This demonstrated that citizens, when mobilised, can play a pivotal role in ensuring accountability and transparency in governance. Additionally, the media played a crucial role in the case, with investigative journalism serving as a linchpin in uncovering and exposing the corruption scandal. According to Seo (2021), media outlets such as the Korean Broadcasting System (KBS) and the Seoul-based Chosun Ilbo newspaper, conducted in-depth investigations that revealed the extent of Park's involvement in corruption. The media's role not only informed the public but also pressured authorities to take action against corruption. This highlighted the importance of a free and robust media in acting as a check on governmental power. LESSONSLEARNED Reforms and Changes in South Korea's Political Landscape The case prompted discussions about the need for a more independent judiciary to ensure fair and impartial handling of corruption cases. The Constitutional Court of Korea played a crucial role in the impeachment of Park Geun-hye (Shin, 2020). However, concerns were raised about the potential influence of political pressure on the judiciary. This led to discussions about reforms to enhance the independence of the judiciary, ensuring that it remains free from undue political interference. Moreover, the scandal spurred calls for electoral reforms and increased political transparency. Citizens and activists advocated for changes in the electoral system to prevent future abuses of power (Shin, 2020). Reforms focused on enhancing the transparency of political campaign funding, strengthening mechanisms for investigating and prosecuting corruption cases involving politicians, and implementing measures to increase the accountability of elected officials to the public. International Perspectives and Cooperation This case reverberated on a global scale, exerting farreaching effects. To elaborate further, the scandal carried international repercussions, influencing diplomatic relations and disrupting economic stability. South Korea's image was tarnished on the global stage, leading to concerns among foreign investors and trading partners (Carothers, 2020). The case demonstrated that corruption within a country's leadership can have far-reaching consequences beyond its borders, influencing how it is perceived in the international community. Consequently, Park Geun-hye’s case emphasised the importance of international cooperation in addressing transnational corruption issues. The investigation into the scandal involved collaboration with foreign governments and international organisations (Van Marrewijk & Viesti, 2020). The case underscored the need for coordinated efforts to combat corruption, as corrupt practices often involve multiple jurisdictions. This highlighted the importance of sharing information and resources to hold individuals accountable for corrupt practices that extend beyond national boundaries. All in all, these illustrate the multifaceted impact of the Park Geun-hye case on the fight against corruption, political landscape reforms, and international perspectives on tackling corruption.
The first female president, Park Geun-Hye, was involved in a big corruption scandal during her term ruling in South Korea. Park Geun Hye had many cases related with her close relationship with Choi Soon-Sil. Choi Soon-Sil is a businesswoman mainly recognized for her involvement in the 2016 South Korean political scandal, which resulted from her influence over The female president. The female president was charged with several serious accusations. There are four primary accusations which are favouritism, embezzlement, power abuse and influence peddling. Park Geun-Hye faced allegations of influence peddling by giving Choi Soon Sil, her close relationship undue power over state affairs in exchange for money. This undermines the concept of open government, causing a lack of conviction about the integrity of decision -makers in the administration (Haas,2018). Besides, Choi Soon-Sil was charged with embezzlement for using her ties to President Park Geun-Hye to obtain money from large South Korean Companies like Samsung and Lotte. The funds were redirected to personal gain, sparking concerns about corruption at the nexus of government and business interest (Park Geun-Hye: South Korea’s Ex-Leader Jailed for 24 Years for Corruption, 2018) CONCLUSIONPresident Park Geun-Hye was faced with accusations of abusing her presidential power by allegedly helping Choi Soon-sil obtain money from big businesses. This raised concerns about government coercion, favouritism, and a breach of public trust (Haas, 2018). The last of the main four accusations is favouritism. Concerns regarding the fairness and impartiality of the administration's decision-making processes were raised by the cronyism allegations in the case, which claimed that Choi Soon-sil had a say in who was chosen to be a high-ranking official and advisor (Hahm & Heo, 2017).
In this case review, The Park Geun-Hye cases affected two parts of South Korea which are political consequences and social and public relations. The former president of South Korea, Park Geun-hye, was involved in a case that caused political unrest and large-scale public demonstrations. Over a million people participated in the massive protest, which led to her impeachment and Moon Jae-in winning the special election. Park's political party, the Saenuri Party which subsequently changed its name to the Liberty Korea Party was severely damaged by the controversy, suffering from splits within the party and a decline in public support (Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, 2018). Disparities in society were brought about by Park Geun-hye's impeachment in Korea. Older people who supported it perceived it as an attack on her legacy with political motivations. Millions of people expressed their dissatisfaction beyond the scandal by taking part in civic action and demanding not only the impeachment of the current administration but also a more comprehensive social transformation to address a range of issues (Nilsson et al., 2017). ...
10 The cases about Park Geun-Hye give many lessons to the people. One of the lessons is the implications for the fight against corruption. After the abuse of power for personal gain made by Park Geun-Hye, there were a large amount of public protest and investigative journalism emphasised the crucial role of an engaged civil society and free media in demanding accountability and checking governmental power. Next, the reforms and changes in South Korea’s political landscape. The cases of Park Geun-hye prompted discussion on the need for a more independent judiciary, particularly in handling corruption cases, with the constitutional Cort of Korea playing vital role in her impeachment (Shin,2020). Concerns about political pressure on the judiciary led to calls for reforms, but the scandal also fueled demands for electoral reforms and increased political transparency to prevent future abuses of power (Shin,2020). Lastly, The incident emphasised the significance of international cooperation in addressing transnational corruption, highlighting the need for collaborative efforts and information sharing across borders (Van Marrewijk & Viesti, 2020). To sum up, The first female president of South Korea, Park Geun-hye, has had a significant impact on public social life and the political landscape in South Korea. People need to learn the lesson about this case and prevent corruption to create good governance.
REFERENCES Auto, H. (2017, February 9). South Korea’s struggling ruling Saenuri party changes its name to Liberal Korea. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/south-koreas-strugglingruling-saenuri-par ty-changes-its-name-to-the-liberal-korea Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. (2018, June 5). The impeachment of South Korean President Park Geun-hye. Retrieved from https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/media/series/asia/theimpeachment-of-south-koreanpresident-park-geun-hye Carothers, C. (2020). The Global Rise of Corruption-Driven Political Change. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 147-168. Crédit Agricole Group .(2023). Economic and Political Overview of South Korea. Retrieved from https://international.groupecreditagricole.com/en/internationalsupport/south-korea/economic-overview Doucette, J. (2017). The Occult of Personality: Korea's Candlelight Protests and the Impeachment of Park Geun-hye. The Journal of Asian Studies, 76(4), 851- 860. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-asianstudies/article/occult-of-per sonality-koreas-candlelight-protests-and-the-impeachment-of-parkgeunhye/477334C E20A83C6824039F9626D355DD Haas, B. (2018, April 6). South Korea: former president Park Geun-hye sentenced to 24 years in jail. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/06/former-southkorea-president-park-g eun-hye-guilty-of-corruption
Hahm, S. D., & Heo, U. (2017). The First Female President in South Korea: Park Geun-hye’s Leadership and South Korean Democracy. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(5), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909617722376 HEO, U., & YUN, S. (2018). South Korea in 2017: Presidential Impeachment and Security Volatility. Asian Survey, 58(1), 65–72. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26390403 John Manning (2017), The Economic Impact Of South Korea’s Presidential Impeachment, International Banker. Retrieved from https://internationalbanker.com/finance/economic-impact-south-koreas-presidential-i impeachment/ Kim Ho Ki (2016), Out of the Shadows: The Collapse of Park Geun-hye and the Future of South Korea, Global Asia. Retrieved from https://www.globalasia.org/v11no4/feature/out-of-the-shadows-the-collapse-of-park-g eun-hye-and-the-future-of-south-korea_ho-ki-kim Michael Rock (2017). South Korea: the corruption that built its economy, International Institute for Asian Studies. Retrieved from https://www.iias.asia/the-newsletter/article/south-korea-corruption-built-its-economy Nilsson-Wright, B. D. J. (2017b, March 10). Park Geun-hye: How identity politics fuelled South Korean scandal. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39228815 Out of the shadows: the collapse of Park Geun-hye and the future of South Korea. (n.d.-b). Global Asia. Retrieved from https://www.globalasia.org/v11no4/feature/out-of-the-shadows-the-collapse-of-park-g eun-hye-and-the-future-of-south-korea_ho-ki-kim Park Geun-hye: South Korea’s ex-leader jailed for 24 years for corruption. (2018, April 6). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43666134 Sarah Chea. (2023). Basic living costs in Korea continue to rise across the board. Korea Joongang Daily. Retrieved from https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2023/01/29/business/industry/korea- bills-gas-bills/20230129175431306.html Seo, S. (2021). South Korea’s Watergate moment: How a media coalition brought down the Park Geun-hye's government. Journalism Practice, 15(4), 526-543. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17512786.2020.1730221 Shin, S. O. (2020). The rise and fall of Park Geun-hye: The perils of South Korea’s weak party system. The Pacific Review, 33(1), 153-183. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09512748.2018.1523804 Shin, G. W. (2020). South Korea's democratic decay. J. Democracy, 31, 100. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jnlodmcy31&div=50 &id=&page=0506_Trust_President_Park.pdf South Korea pardons jailed former President Park Geun-hye. (2021, December 24). Www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/12/24/skorea-ex-president-park-jailed-for-corru ption-is-pardoned South Korea in 2017 on JSTOR. (n.d.-c). www.jstor.org. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26390403 Van Marrewijk, A., & Viesti, G. (2020). Korean Anti-Corruption Public Diplomacy. COLLECTION OF ESSAYS ON KOREA’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY: POSSIBILITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK, 165. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ingrid-Leiria/publication/348993607_SOUTH_K OREAN_NEW_DEAL_AND_THE_ROLE_OF_ECO-DIPLOMACY'/links/601a458 9299bf1cc269ce320/SOUTH-KOREAN-NEW-DEAL-AND-THE-ROLE-OF-ECO-D IPLOMACY.pdf#page=165
THANK YOU