Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 6th Edition

This page intentionally left blank

Glossary

Accommodation The process of changing internal Associative Shifting Process of changing behavior
structures to provide consistency with external reality. whereby responses made to a particular stimulus even-
tually are made to a different stimulus as a consequence
Accretion Encoding new information in terms of exist- of altering the stimulus slightly on repeated trials.
ing schemata
Associative Strength Strength of association between a
Achievement Motivation The striving to be competent stimulus and a response.
in effortful activities.
Associative Structure Means of representing informa-
Act A class of movements that produces an outcome. tion in long-term memory; bits of information that
Action Control Potentially modifiable self-regulatory occur close together in time or that otherwise are asso-
ciated and stored together so that when one is remem-
volitional skills and strategies. bered, the other also is remembered.
Action Control Theory Theory stressing the role of vo-
Associative Writing Writing that reflects one’s knowl-
litional processes in behavior. edge of a topic without regard for elements of style.
Activation Level Extent that information in memory is
Asynchronous Learning Nonreal-time interactions.
being processed or is capable of being processed Attention The process of selecting some environmental
quickly; information in an active state is quickly
accessible. inputs for further information processing.
Actualizing Tendency Innate motive that is a precursor Attribution Perceived cause of an outcome.
to other motives and is oriented toward personal Attribution Retraining Intervention strategy aimed at
growth, autonomy, and freedom from external control.
Adaptation See Equilibration. altering students’ attributional beliefs, usually from dys-
Adapting Instruction Tailoring instructional conditions functional attributions (e.g., failure attributed to low
at the system, course, or individual class level to match ability) to those conducive to motivation and learning
important individual differences to ensure equal learn- (failure attributed to low effort).
ing opportunities for all students. Automaticity Cognitive processing with little or no con-
Advance Organizer Device that helps connect new ma- scious awareness.
terial with prior learning, usually with a broad state- Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) The part of the
ment presented at the outset of a lesson. nervous system that regulates involuntary behaviors in-
Affective Learning Technique Specific procedure in- volving the heart, lungs, glands, and muscles.
cluded in a learning strategy to create a favorable psy- Axon Long thread of brain tissue in a neuron that sends
chological climate for learning by helping the learner messages.
cope with anxiety, develop positive beliefs, set work Baby Biography A report on a single child based on a
goals, establish a place and time for working, or mini- series of observations over a lengthy period.
mize distractions. Backup Reinforcer A reinforcer that one receives in
All-or-None Learning View that a response is learned exchange for a generalized reinforcer.
by proceeding from zero or low strength to full Balance Theory Theory postulating the tendency for
strength rapidly (e.g., during one trial). people to balance relations between persons, situa-
Amygdala Part of the brain involved in regulating emo- tions, and events.
tion and aggression. Behavior Modification (Therapy) Systematic applica-
Analogical Reasoning Problem-solving strategy in tion of behavioral learning principles to facilitate adap-
which one draws an analogy between the problem sit- tive behaviors.
uation and a situation with which one is familiar, Behavior Rating An estimate of how often a behavior
works through the problem in the familiar domain, and occurs in a given time.
relates the solution to the problem situation. Behavioral Objective Statement describing the behav-
Apprenticeship Situation in which novice works with iors a student will perform as a result of instruction, the
expert in joint work-related activities. conditions under which behaviors will be performed,
Archival Record Permanent record that exists inde- and the criteria for assessing behaviors to determine
pendently of other assessments. whether the objective has been accomplished.
Artificial Intelligence Programming computers to en- Behavioral Theory Theory that views learning as a
gage in human activities such as thinking, using lan- change in the form or frequency of behavior as a con-
guage, and solving problems. sequence of environmental events.
Assessment The process of determining students’ status Biologically Primary Ability An ability that is largely
with respect to educational variables. biologically based.
Assimilation The process of fitting external reality to Biologically Secondary Ability An ability that is largely
existing cognitive structures. culturally taught.
Assistive Technology Equipment adapted for use by Blended Model Instruction that combines face-to-face
students with disabilities. instruction with e-learning.

489

490 Glossary

Bottom-Up Processing Pattern recognition of visual Cognitive Consistency Idea that people have a need to
stimuli that proceeds from analysis of features to build-
ing a meaningful representation. make behaviors and cognitions consistent.

Brain The primary organ in the nervous system that reg- Cognitive Constructivism See Dialectical
ulates cognition, motivation, and emotions.
Constructivism.
Brainstem That part of the central nervous system that
links the lower brain with the middle brain and Cognitive Dissonance Mental tension that is produced
hemispheres.
by conflicting cognitions and that has drivelike proper-
Brainstorming Problem-solving strategy that comprises
defining the problem, generating possible solutions, ties leading to reduction.
deciding on criteria to use in judging solutions, and ap-
plying criteria to select the best solution. Cognitive Map Internal plan comprising expectancies of

Branching Program Type of programmed instruction which actions are required to attain one’s goal.
in which students complete different sequences de-
pending on how well they perform. Cognitive Modeling Modeled explanation and demon-

Broca’s Area Brain part in the left frontal lobe that con- stration incorporating verbalizations of the model’s
trols speech production.
thoughts and reasons for performing given actions.
Buggy Algorithm An incorrect rule for solving a mathe-
matical problem. Cognitive Style Stable variation among learners in ways

Capital Socioeconomic indicator that includes one’s of perceiving, organizing, processing, and remember-
financial, material, human, and social resources.
ing information.
CAT Scan Computerized axial tomography; technology
that provides three-dimensional images used to detect Cognitive (Response) Tempo Cognitive style referring
body abnormalities.
to the willingness to pause and reflect on the accuracy
Categorical Clustering Recalling items in groups based
on similar meaning or membership in the same category. of information in a situation of response uncertainty.

Categorization Style Cognitive style referring to the cri- Cognitive Theory Theory that views learning as the ac-
teria used to perceive objects as similar to one another.
quisition of knowledge and cognitive structures due to
Cell Assembly In Hebb’s theory, a structure that in-
cludes cells in the cortex and subcortical centers. information processing.

Central Nervous System (CNS) The part of the nervous Collective Teacher Efficacy Perceptions of teachers in
system that includes the spinal cord and the brain.
a school that their efforts as a whole will positively af-
Cerebellum Part of the brain that regulates body bal-
ance, muscular control, movement, and body posture. fect students.

Cerebral Cortex The thin, outer covering of the cere- Comer Program See School Development Program.
brum.
Comparative Organizer Type of advance organizer
Cerebrum The largest part of the brain that includes left
and right hemispheres; involved in cognition and that introduces new material by drawing an analogy
learning.
with familiar material.
Chaining The linking of three-term contingencies so
that each response alters the environment and that al- Comprehension Attaching meaning to verbal (printed
tered condition serves as a stimulus for the next re-
sponse. or spoken) information and using it for a particular

Chameleon Effect Nonconscious mimicking of be- purpose.
haviors and mannerisms of persons in one’s social
environment. Comprehension Monitoring Cognitive activity

Chunking Combining information in a meaningful directed toward determining whether one is prop-
fashion.
erly applying knowledge to material to be learned,
Classical Conditioning Descriptive term for Pavlov’s
theory in which a neutral stimulus becomes condi- evaluating whether one understands the material,
tioned to elicit a response through repeated pairing
with an unconditioned stimulus. deciding that the strategy is effective or that a better

Closed-Loop Theory Theory of motor skill learning strategy is needed, and knowing why strategy use
postulating that people develop perceptual traces of
motor movements through practice and feedback. improves learning. Monitoring procedures include

Cognitive Behavior Modification Behavior modifica- self-questioning, rereading, paraphrasing, and check-
tion techniques that incorporate learners’ thoughts
(overt and covert) as discriminative and reinforcing ing consistencies.
stimuli.
Computer-Based (-Assisted) Instruction Interactive

instruction in which a computer system provides infor-

mation and feedback to students and receives student

input.

Computer-Based Learning Environment Setting that

includes computer technology used for learning in var-

ious ways, including with simulations, computer-based

instruction, and hypermedia/multimedia.

Computer Learning Learning that occurs with the aid

of a computer.

Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Tech-

nological applications that allow users to communicate

with one another (e.g., distance education, computer

conferencing).

Concept Labeled set of objects, symbols, or events shar-

ing common characteristics (critical attributes).

Concept Learning Identifying attributes, generalizing

them to new examples, and discriminating examples

from nonexamples.

Glossary 491

Conception of Ability One’s belief/theory about the Corpus Callosum Band of fibers in the brain that con-
nature of intelligence (ability) and how it changes over nects the right and left hemispheres.
time.
Correlational Research A study in which an investigator
Concrete Operational Stage Third of Piaget’s stages explores naturally existing relations among variables.
of cognitive development, encompassing roughly
ages 7 to 11. Cortex See Cerebral Cortex.
Cortisol Bodily hormone that when elevated in babies
Conditional Knowledge Knowledge of when to em-
ploy forms of declarative and procedural knowledge can retard their brain development.
and why doing so is important. Declarative Knowledge Knowledge that something is

Conditional Regard Regard that is contingent on cer- the case; knowledge of facts, beliefs, organized pas-
tain actions. sages, and events of a story.
Decoding Deciphering printed symbols or making let-
Conditioned Response (CR) The response elicited by a ter-sound correspondences.
conditioned stimulus. Deductive Reasoning Process of deriving specific
points from general principles.
Conditioned Stimulus (CS) A stimulus that, when re- Deep Structure The meaning of the speech and syntax
peatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus, elicits of a language.
a conditioned response similar to the unconditioned Dendrite Elongated brain tissue surrounding a neuron
response. that receives messages.
Descriptive Research See Qualitative Research.
Conditioning Theory See Behavioral Theory. Development Changes in people over time that follow
Conditions of Learning Circumstances that prevail when an orderly pattern and enhance survival.
Developmental Status What an individual is capable of
learning occurs and that include internal conditions (pre- doing given his or her present level of development.
requisite skills and cognitive processing requirements of Developmentally Appropriate Instruction Instruction
the learner) and external conditions (environmental stim- matched to students’ developmental levels.
uli that support the learner’s cognitive processes). Dialectical Constructivism Constructivist perspective
Connectionism Descriptive term for Thorndike’s theory stating that knowledge derives from interactions be-
postulating learning as the forming of connections be- tween persons and their environments.
tween sensory experiences (perceptions of stimuli or Dialogue Conversation between two or more persons
events) and neural impulses that manifest themselves while engaged in a learning task.
behaviorally. Dichotic Listening Hearing two verbal inputs simulta-
Connectionist Model Computer simulation of learning neously.
processes in which learning is linked with neural sys- Differentiated Task Structure Class situation in which
tem processing, where impulses fire across synapses to all students work on different tasks and materials or
form connections. methods are tailored to students’ needs.
Consolidation The process of stabilizing and strength- Digit-Span Task Information processing task in which
ening neural (synaptic) connections. participants hear a series of digits and then attempt to
Constructivism Doctrine stating that learning takes recall them in the same order.
place in contexts and that learners form or construct Direct Observations Instances of behavior that are ob-
much of what they learn and understand as a function served.
of their experiences in situations. Discovery Learning A type of inductive reasoning in
Constructivist Theory See Constructivism. which one obtains knowledge by formulating and test-
Contiguity (Contiguous Conditioning) The basic ing hypotheses through hands-on experiences.
principle of Guthrie’s theory, which refers to learning Discrimination Responding differently, depending on
that results from a pairing close in time of a response the stimulus.
with a stimulus or situation. Discriminative Stimulus The stimulus to which one re-
Contingency Contract Written or oral agreement be- sponds in the operant model of conditioning.
tween teacher and student specifying what work the Disinhibition See Inhibition/Disinhibition.
student must accomplish to earn a particular reinforcer. Distance Learning (Education) Instruction that origi-
Continuous Reinforcement Reinforcement for every nates at one site and is transmitted to students at one
response. or more remote sites; it may include two-way interac-
Control (Executive) Processes Cognitive activities that tive capabilities.
regulate the flow of information through the process- Domain Specificity Discrete declarative and procedural
ing system. knowledge structures.
Cooperative Learning Situation in which a group of Dopamine A chemical neurotransmitter that can lead to
students work on a task that is too great for any one the brain being more sensitive to the pleasurable
student to complete and in which an objective is to de- effects of drugs and alcohol.
velop in students the ability to work collaboratively. Drive Internal force that energizes and propels one into
Coping Model Model who initially demonstrates the action.
typical fears and deficiencies of observers but gradu-
ally demonstrates improved performance and self-con-
fidence in his or her capabilities.

492 Glossary

Dual-Code Theory The view that long-term memory Episodic Memory Memory of particular times, places,
represents knowledge with a verbal system that in persons, and events, which is personal and autobio-
cludes knowledge expressed in language and an imag- graphical.
inal system that stores visual and spatial information.
Epistemology Study of the origin, nature, limits, and
Dual-Memory Model of Information Processing See methods of knowledge.
Two-Store (Dual) Memory Model of Information
Processing. Equilibration A biological drive to produce an optimal
state of equilibrium; it includes the complementary
Duration Measure Amount of time a behavior occurs processes of assimilation and accommodation.
during a given period.
Event-Related Potentials Changes in brain waves
Echo Sensory memory for auditory sounds. measured while individuals are engaged in various
EEG Electroencephalograph; measures electrical patterns tasks.

caused by movement of neurons and used to investi- Evoked Potentials, See Event-Related Potentials.
gate brain disorders. Executive Processes See Control (Executive) Processes.
Effectance Motivation (Mastery Motivation) Exogenous Constructivism Constructivist perspective
Motivation to interact effectively with one’s environ-
ment and control critical aspects. stating that the acquisition of knowledge represents a
Efficacy Expectations See Self-Efficacy. reconstruction of structures that exist in the external
Ego Involvement Motivational state characterized by world.
self-preoccupation, a desire to avoid looking incompe- Expectancy-Value Theory Psychological theory postu-
tent, and viewing learning as a means to the end of lating that behavior is a function of how much one val-
avoiding appearing to lack ability. ues a particular outcome and one’s expectation of ob-
Egocentrism Cognitive inability to take the perspective taining that outcome as a result of performing that
of another person. behavior.
Eidetic Imagery Photographic memory in which an Experimental Research A study in which an investiga-
image appears and disappears in segments. tor systematically varies conditions (independent vari-
Elaboration The process of expanding upon new infor- ables) and observes changes in outcomes (dependent
mation by adding to it or linking it to what one already variables).
knows. Expert A person who has attained a high level of com-
Elaboration Theory of Instruction Means of pre- petence in a domain.
senting instruction in which one begins with a gen- Expert System Computer system that is programmed
eral view of the content, moves to specific details, with a large knowledge base and that behaves intelli-
and returns later to the general view with review and gently by solving problems and providing instruction.
practice. Expository Organizer Type of advance organizer that
E-Learning Learning through electronic means. introduces new material with concept definitions and
Electronic Bulletin Board (Conference) Electronic generalizations.
means for posting messages and participating in a dis- Expository Teaching Deductive teaching strategy in
cussion (chat group). which material is presented in an organized and mean-
Electronic Media Media that operate through electronic ingful fashion with general ideas followed by specific
means including televisions, cell phones, video games, points.
Web social networks, and e-mail. Extinction Decrease in intensity and disappearance of a
Empiricism The doctrine that experience is the only conditioned response due to repeated presentations of
source of knowledge. the conditioned stimulus without the unconditioned
Enactive Learning Learning through actual perfor- stimulus.
mance. Extrinsic Motivation Engaging in a task as a means to
Enactive Representation Representing knowledge the end of attaining an outcome (reward).
through motor responses. Facilitator One who arranges resources and shares feel-
Encoding The process of putting new, incoming infor- ings and thoughts with students in order to promote
mation into the information processing system and learning.
preparing it for storage in long-term memory. Fatigue Method of Behavioral Change Altering behav-
Encoding Specificity Hypothesis The idea that re- ior by transforming the cue for engaging in the behav-
trieval of information from long-term memory is maxi- ior into a cue for avoiding it through repeated presen-
mized when retrieval cues match those present during tation.
encoding. Fear of Failure The tendency to avoid an achievement
Endogenous Constructivism Constructivist perspective goal that derives from one’s belief concerning the an-
stating that people construct mental structures out of ticipated negative consequences of failing.
preexisting structures and not directly from environ- Feature Analysis Theory of perception postulating
mental information. that people learn the critical features of stimuli,
Entity Theory The belief that abilities represent fixed which are stored in long-term memory as images or
traits over which one has little control. verbal codes and compared with environmental
inputs.

Glossary 493

Field Dependence and Independence Cognitive style Gestalt Principles Figure-ground relationship: A per-
referring to the extent that one is dependent on or dis- ceptual field is composed of a figure against a back-
tracted by the context in which a stimulus or event oc- ground. Proximity: Elements in a perceptual field are
curs. Also called global and analytical functioning. viewed as belonging together according to their close-
ness in space or time. Similarity: Perceptual field
Field Expectancy Perceived relation between two stim- elements similar in such respects as size or color are
uli or among a stimulus, response, and stimulus. viewed as belonging together. Common direction:
Elements of a perceptual field appearing to constitute a
Field Research Study conducted where participants pattern or flow in the same direction are perceived as
live, work, or go to school. a figure. Simplicity: People organize perceptual fields
in simple, regular features. Closure: People fill in in-
Figure-Ground Relation See Gestalt Principles. complete patterns or experiences.
Filter (Bottleneck) Theory Theory of attention con-
Gestalt Psychology Psychological theory of perception
tending that information not perceived is not and learning stressing the organization of sensory ex-
processed beyond the sensory register. periences.
First Signal System See Primary Signals.
Flow Total involvement in an activity. Glial Cell Brain cell that serves to nourish and cleanse
fMRI See Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. neurons.
Forgetting Loss of information from memory or inability
to recall information due to interference or improper Global and Analytical Functioning See Field
retrieval cues. Dependence and Independence.
Formal Operational Stage Fourth of Piaget’s stages of
cognitive development, encompassing roughly ages 11 Goal The behavior (outcome) that one is consciously
to adult. trying to perform (attain).
Free Recall Recalling stimuli in any order.
Frequency Count Frequency of a behavior in a given Goal Orientations Reasons for engaging in academic
time period. tasks.
Frontal Lobe Brain lobe responsible for processing in-
formation relating to memory, planning, decision mak- Goal Setting Process of establishing a standard or objec-
ing, goal setting, and creativity; also contains the pri- tive to serve as the aim of one’s actions.
mary motor cortex regulating muscular movements.
Functional Analysis of Behavior Process of deter- Grammar The underlying abstract set of rules governing
mining the external variables of which behavior is a a language.
function.
Functional Fixedness Failure to perceive different uses Grouping Structure Instructional method for linking at-
for objects or new configurations of elements in a situ- tainment of students’ goals. Cooperative—positive link;
ation. competitive—negative link; individualistic—no link.
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Technology measuring magnetic flow in the brain Habit Behavior established to many cues.
caused by performance of mental tasks that fires neu- Hedonism Philosophical position that humans seek
rons and causes blood flow; image compared to that of
the brain at rest to show responsible regions. pleasure and avoid pain.
Functional Theories of Development Theories postu- Heuristic A method for solving problems in which one
lating the types of functions or processes that a child is
able to perform at a particular time. employs principles (rules of thumb) that usually lead
Functionalism Doctrine postulating that mental to a solution.
processes and behaviors of living organisms help them Higher-Order Conditioning Use of a conditioned stim-
adapt to their environments. ulus to condition a new, neutral stimulus by pairing the
Game Activity that creates an enjoyable learning con- two stimuli.
text by linking material to sport, adventure, or Hill Climbing See Working Forward.
fantasy. Hippocampus Brain structure responsible for memory
General Skill Skill applying to many domains (e.g., goal of the immediate past and helps to establish informa-
setting). tion in long-term memory.
Generalization Occurrence of a response to a new Holistic Idea that we must study people’s behaviors,
stimulus or in a situation other than that present during thoughts, and feelings together and not in isolation.
original learning. See also Transfer. Homeostasis Optimal levels of physiological states.
Generalized Reinforcer A secondary reinforcer that be- Hope for Success The tendency to approach an
comes paired with more than one primary or second- achievement goal that derives from one’s subjective es-
ary reinforcer. timate of the likelihood of succeeding.
Generate-and-Test Strategy Problem-solving strategy in Humanistic Theory Theory emphasizing people’s ca-
which one generates (thinks of) a possible problem so- pabilities to make choices and seek control over their
lution and tests its effectiveness. lives.
Hypermedia See Multimedia.
Hypothalamus Part of the autonomic nervous sys-
tem that controls body functions needed to main-
tain homeostasis and also is involved in emotional
reactions.
Hypothesis Assumption that can be empirically tested.
Icon Sensory memory for visual inputs.

494 Glossary

Iconic Representation Representing knowledge with Interview Situation in which interviewer presents ques-
mental images. tions or points to discuss and respondent answers
orally.
Identical Elements View of transfer postulating that ap-
plication of a response in a situation other than the one Intrinsic Motivation Engaging in a task for no obvious
in which it was learned depends on the number of fea- reward except for the activity itself (the activity is the
tures (stimuli) common to the two situations. means and the end).

Imitation Copying the observed behaviors and verbal- Introspection Type of self-analysis in which individuals
izations of others. verbally report their immediate perceptions following
exposure to objects or events.
Implicit Theories Students’ beliefs about themselves,
others, and their environments. Irreversibility The cognitive belief that once something
is done it cannot be changed.
Inclusion Process of integrating students with disabili-
ties into regular classroom instruction. Keyword Method Mnemonic technique in which one
generates an image of a word sounding like the item to
Incompatible Response Method of Behavioral be learned and links that image with the meaning of
Change Altering behavior by pairing the cue for the the item to be learned.
undesired behavior with a response incompatible with
(i.e., that cannot be performed at the same time as) the Laboratory Research Study conducted in a controlled
undesired response. setting.

Incremental Learning View that learning becomes es- Language Acquisition Device (LAD) Mental structure
tablished gradually through repeated performances that forms and verifies transformational rules to ac-
(exemplified by Thorndike’s theory). count for overt language.

Incremental Theory The belief that abilities are skills Latent Learning Learning that occurs from environ-
that can improve through learning. mental interactions in the absence of a goal or rein-
forcement.
Inductive Reasoning Process of formulating general
principles based on specific examples. Lateralization See Localization.
Law of Disuse That part of the Law of Exercise postulat-
Information Processing Sequence and execution of
cognitive events. ing that the strength of a connection between a situa-
tion and response is decreased when the connection is
Inhibition In Pavlov’s theory, a type of neural excitation not made over a period of time.
that works antagonistically to an excitation producing Law of Effect The strength of a connection is influenced
conditioning and that diminishes the conditioned re- by the consequences of performing the response in the
sponse in intensity or extinguishes it. situation: Satisfying consequences strengthen a con-
nection; annoying consequences weaken a connec-
Inhibition/Disinhibition Strengthening/weakening of tion. Eventually modified by Thorndike to state that
inhibitions over behaviors previously learned, which annoying consequences do not weaken connections.
results from observing consequences of the behaviors Law of Exercise Learning (unlearning) occurs through
performed by models. repetition (nonrepetition) of a response. Eventually
discarded by Thorndike.
Inquiry Teaching Socratic teaching method in which Law of Readiness When an organism is prepared to act,
learners formulate and test hypotheses, differentiate to do so is satisfying and not to do so is annoying.
necessary from sufficient conditions, make predictions, When an organism is not prepared to act, forcing it to
and decide when more information is needed. act is annoying.
Law of Use That part of the Law of Exercise postulat-
Insight A sudden perception, awareness of a solution, ing that the strength of a connection between a situ-
or transformation from an unlearned to a learned state. ation and response is increased when the connection
is made.
Instinct A natural behavior or capacity. Learned Helplessness Psychological state involving a
Instructional Quality The degree to which instruction disturbance in motivation, cognition, and emotions
due to previously experienced uncontrollability (lack
is effective, efficient, appealing, and economical in of contingency between action and outcome).
promoting student performance and attitude toward Learning An enduring change in behavior or in the ca-
learning. pacity to behave in a given fashion resulting from prac-
Instructional Scaffolding See Scaffolding. tice or other forms of experience.
Instructional Self-Efficacy Personal beliefs about one’s Learning Goal A goal of acquiring knowledge, behav-
capabilities to help students learn. iors, skills, or strategies.
Interference Blockage of the spread of activation across Learning Hierarchy Organized set of intellectual
memory networks. skills.
Intermittent Reinforcement Reinforcement for some Learning Method Specific procedure or technique in-
but not all responses. cluded in a learning strategy and used to attain a learn-
Internalization Transforming information acquired ing goal.
from the social environment into mechanisms of self-
regulating control.
Internet International collection of computer networks.
Interval Schedule Reinforcement is contingent on
the first response being made after a specific time
period.

Glossary 495

Learning Strategy Systematic plan oriented toward reg- Mimesis See Imitation.
ulating academic work and producing successful task Min Model Counting method in which one begins with
performance.
the larger addend and counts in the smaller one.
Learning Style See Cognitive Style. Mnemonic A type of learning method that makes to-be-
Levels (Depth) of Processing Conceptualization of
learned material meaningful by relating it to informa-
memory according to the type of processing that infor- tion that one already knows.
mation receives rather than the processing’s location. Modeling Behavioral, cognitive, and affective changes
Linear Program Programmed instructional materials deriving from observing one or more models.
that all students complete in the same sequence. Molar Behavior A large sequence of behavior that is
Localization Control of specific functions by different goal directed.
sides of the brain or in different areas of the brain. Motherese Speaking to children in simple utterances,
Locus of Control Motivational concept referring to gen- often in abbreviated form.
eralized control over outcomes; individuals may be- Motivated Learning Motivation to acquire new knowl-
lieve that outcomes occur independently of how they edge, skills, and strategies, rather than merely to com-
act (external control) or are highly contingent on their plete activities.
actions (internal control). Motivation The process of instigating and sustaining
Long-Term Memory (LTM) Stage of information pro- goal-directed activities.
cessing corresponding to the permanent repository of Motivational State A complex neural connection that
knowledge. includes emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Mapping Learning technique in which one identifies im- Movement Discrete behavior that results from muscle
portant ideas and specifies how they are related. contractions.
Mastery Learning A systematic instructional plan that MRI Magnetic resonance imaging; technology in which
has as its objective students demonstrating high radio waves cause the brain to produce signals that are
achievement and that includes the components of mapped, which can detect tumors, lesions, and other
defining mastery, planning for mastery, teaching for abnormalities.
mastery, and grading for mastery. Multidimensional Classroom Classroom having
Mastery Model Model who demonstrates faultless per- many activities and allowing for diversity in student
formance and high self-confidence throughout the abilities.
modeled sequence. Multimedia Technology that combines the capabilities
Mastery Motivation See Effectance Motivation. of computers with other media such as film, video,
Matched-Dependent Behavior Behavior matched to sound, music, and text.
(the same as) that of the model and dependent on Myelin Sheath Brain tissue surrounding an axon and fa-
(elicited by) the model’s action. cilitating travel of signals.
Meaningful Reception Learning Learning of ideas, Naïve Analysis of Action The way that common people
concepts, and principles when material is presented in interpret events.
final form and related to students’ prior knowledge. Narration Written account of behavior and the context
Means–Ends Analysis Problem-solving strategy in in which it occurs.
which one compares the current situation with the goal Negative Reinforcer A stimulus that, when removed by
to identify the differences between them, sets a sub- a response, increases the future likelihood of the re-
goal to reduce one of the differences, performs opera- sponse occurring in that situation.
tions to reach the subgoal, and repeats the process Negative Transfer Prior learning that makes subsequent
until the goal is attained. learning more difficult.
Mediation Mechanism that bridges the link between ex- Network A set of interrelated propositions in long-term
ternal reality and mental processes and affects the de- memory.
velopment of the latter. Networking Computers in various locations connected
Mental Discipline The doctrine that learning certain to one another and to central peripheral devices.
subjects in school enhances mental functioning better Neural Assemblies Collections of neurons synoptically
than does studying other subjects. connected with one another.
Mental Imagery Mental representation of spatial knowl- Neuron Brain cell that sends and receives information
edge that includes physical properties of the object or across muscles and organs.
event represented. Neuroscience Science of the relation of the nervous
Mentoring Situation involving the teaching of skills and system to learning and behavior.
strategies to students or other professionals within ad- Neuroscience of Learning See Neuroscience.
vising and training contexts. Neurotransmitter Chemical secretions that travel along
Metacognition Deliberate conscious control of one’s a brain axon to dendrites of the next cell.
cognitive activities. Nonsense Syllable Three-letter (consonant-vowel-
Method of Loci Mnemonic technique in which informa- consonant) combination that makes a nonword.
tion to be remembered is paired with locations in a fa- Novice A person who has some familiarity with a do-
miliar setting. main but performs poorly.

496 Glossary

Novice-to-Expert Methodology Means of analyzing Perception Process of recognizing and assigning mean-
learning by comparing behaviors and reported ing to a sensory input.
thoughts of skilled individuals (experts) with those of
less-skilled persons (novices) and deciding on an effi- Performance Goal A goal of completing a task.
cient means of moving novices to the expert level. PET Scan Positive emission tomography scan; assesses

Observational Learning Display of a new pattern of gamma rays produced by mental activity and provides
behavior by one who observes a model; prior to the overall picture of brain activity.
modeling, the behavior has a zero probability of occur- Phase Sequence In Hebb’s theory, a series of cell as-
rence by the observer even with motivational induce- semblies.
ments in effect. Phi Phenomenon Perceptual phenomenon of apparent
motion caused by lights flashing on and off at short
Occipital Lobe Brain lobe primarily concerned with intervals.
processing visual information. Phonemes The smallest unit of a speech sound.
Positive Regard Feelings such as respect, liking,
Operant Behavior Behavior that produces an effect on warmth, sympathy, and acceptance.
the environment. Positive Reinforcer A stimulus that, when presented
following a response, increases the future likelihood of
Operant Conditioning Presenting reinforcement con- the response occurring in that situation.
tingent on a response emitted in the presence of a Positive Self-Regard Positive regard that derives from
stimulus to increase the rate or likelihood of occur- self-experiences.
rence of the response. Positive Transfer Prior learning facilitates subsequent
learning.
Operational Definition Definition of a phenomenon Postdecisional Processes Cognitive activities engaged
in terms of the operations or procedures used to in subsequent to goal setting.
measure it. Predecisional Processes Cognitive activities involved
in making decisions and setting goals.
Oral Responses Verbalized questions or answers to Prefrontal Cortex Front part of the frontal lobe of the
questions. brain.
Premack Principle A principle stating that the opportu-
Outcome Expectation Belief concerning the antici- nity to engage in a more-valued activity reinforces en-
pated outcome of actions. gaging in a less-valued activity.
Preoperational Stage Second of Piaget’s stages of cog-
Overjustification Decrease in intrinsic interest (motiva- nitive development, encompassing roughly ages 2 to 7.
tion) in an activity subsequent to engaging in it under Primacy Effect Tendency to recall the initial items in a
conditions that make task engagement salient as a list.
means to some end (e.g., reward). Primary Motor Cortex. Area of the brain that controls
bodily movements.
Paired-Associate Recall Recalling the response of a Primary Qualities Characteristics of objects (e.g., size,
stimulus–response item when presented with the shape) that exist in the external world as part of the
stimulus. objects.
Primary Reinforcement Behavioral consequence that
Paradigm Model for research. satisfies a biological need.
Parietal Lobe Brain lobe responsible for the sense of Primary Signals Environmental events that can become
conditioned stimuli and produce conditioned re-
touch; helps determine body position, and integrates sponses.
visual information. Private Events Thoughts or feelings accessible only to
Parsing Mentally dividing perceived sound patterns into the individual.
units of meaning. Private Speech The set of speech phenomena that has
Participant Modeling Therapeutic treatment (used by a self-regulatory function but is not socially commu-
Bandura) comprising modeled demonstrations, joint nicative.
performance between client and therapist, gradual Proactive Interference Old learning makes new learn-
withdrawal of performance aids, and individual mas- ing more difficult.
tery performance by the client. Problem A situation in which one is trying to reach a
Pattern Recognition See Perception. goal and must find a means of attaining it.
Peer Collaboration Learning that occurs when students Problem Solving One’s efforts to achieve a goal for
work together and their social interactions serve an in- which one does not have an automatic solution.
structional function. Problem Space The problem-solving context that com-
Peer Tutoring Situation in which a student who has prises a beginning state, a goal state, and possible so-
learned a skill teaches it to one who has not. lution paths leading through subgoals and requiring
Pegword Method Mnemonic technique in which the application of operations.
learner memorizes a set of objects rhyming with inte-
ger names (e.g., one is a bun, two is a shoe, etc.), gen-
erates an image of each item to be learned, and links it
with the corresponding object image. During recall, the
learner recalls the rhyming scheme with its associated
links.
Perceived Control Belief that one can influence task
engagement and outcomes.
Perceived Self-Efficacy See Self-Efficacy.

Glossary 497

Procedural Knowledge Knowledge of how to do the context, psychological processes, learning and mo-
something: employ algorithms and rules, identify con- tivation, and self-knowledge.
cepts, solve problems. Rehearsal Repeating information to oneself aloud or
subvocally.
Process-Product Research Study that relates changes Reinforcement Any stimulus or event that leads to re-
in teaching processes to student products or outcomes. sponse strengthening.
Reinforcement History Extent that an individual has
Production Translating visual and symbolic conceptions been reinforced previously for performing the same or
of events into behaviors. similar behavior.
Reinforcement Theory See Behavioral Theory.
Production Deficiency The failure to generate task- Reinforcing Stimulus The stimulus in the operant
relevant verbalizations when they could improve per- model of conditioning that is presented contingent on
formance. a response and increases the probability of the re-
sponse being emitted in the future in the presence of
Production System (Production) Memory network of the discriminative stimulus.
condition–action sequences (rules), where the condi- Relativism The doctrine that all forms of knowledge are
tion is the set of circumstances that activates the system justifiable because they are constructed by learners, es-
and the action is the set of activities that occurs. pecially if they reflect social consensus.
Research Systematic investigation designed to develop
Productive Thinking See Problem Solving. or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
Programmed Instruction (PI) Instructional materials Resource Allocation Learning model specifying that at-
tention is a limited resource and is allocated to activi-
developed in accordance with behavioral learning ties as a function of motivation and self-regulation.
principles. Respondent Behavior Response made to an eliciting
Proposition The smallest unit of information that can stimulus.
be judged true or false. Response Facilitation Previously learned behaviors of
Propositional Network Interconnected associative observers are prompted by the actions of models.
structure in long-term memory comprising nodes or Response Tempo See Cognitive (Response) Tempo.
bits of information. Restructuring Process of forming new schemata.
Prototype Abstract form stored in memory that contains Retention Storage of information in memory.
the basic ingredients of a stimulus and is compared Reticular Formation Part of the brain that handles au-
with an environmental input during perception. tonomic nervous systems functions, controls sensory
Punishment Withdrawal of a positive reinforcer, or inputs, and is involved in awareness.
presentation of a negative reinforcer contingent on a Retroactive Interference New learning makes recall of
response, which decreases the future likelihood of old knowledge and skills more difficult.
the response being made in the presence of the Reversibility Cognitive ability to sequence operations in
stimulus. opposite order.
Purposive Behaviorism Descriptive term for Tolman’s Rhetorical Problem The problem space in writing,
theory emphasizing the study of large sequences of which includes the writer’s topic, intended audience,
(molar) goal-directed behaviors. and goals.
Qualitative Research Study characterized by depth and Satiation Fulfillment of reinforcement that results in de-
quality of analysis and interpretation of data through creased responding.
the use of methods such as classroom observations, Savings Score Time or trials necessary for relearning as
use of existing records, interviews, and think-aloud a percentage of time or trials required for original
protocols. learning.
Questionnaire Situation in which respondents are pre- Scaffolding Process of controlling task elements that are
sented with items or questions asking about their beyond the learner’s capabilities so that the learner can
thoughts and actions. focus on and master those task features that he or she
Ratings by Others Evaluations of students on quality or can grasp quickly.
quantity of performance. Schedule of Reinforcement When reinforcement is
Ratio Schedule A schedule where reinforcement is con- applied.
tingent on the number of responses. Schema A cognitive structure that organizes large
Rationalism The doctrine that knowledge derives from amounts of information into a meaningful system.
reason without the aid of the senses. Schema Theory Theory explaining how people de-
Readiness What children are capable of doing or learn- velop schemas (organized memory structures com-
ing at various points in development. posed of related information).
Reasoning Mental processes involved in generating and School Development Program System of community
evaluating logical arguments. and parental involvement in schools stressing consen-
Recency Effect Tendency to recall the last items in a list. sus, collaboration, and no-fault.
Reciprocal Teaching Interactive dialogue between
teacher and students in which teacher initially models
activities, after which teacher and students take turns
being the teacher.
Reflective Teaching Thoughtful teacher decision mak-
ing that takes into account knowledge about students,

498 Glossary

Scientific Literacy Understanding the meanings, foun- Self-Regulation (Self-Regulated Learning) The
dations, current status, and problems of scientific process whereby students personally activate and sus-
phenomena. tain behaviors, cognitions, and affects that are system-
atically oriented toward the attainment of learning
Script A mental representation of an often-repeated goals.
event.
Self-Reinforcement The process whereby individuals,
Second Signal System Words and other features of lan- after performing a response, arrange to receive rein-
guage that are used by humans to communicate and forcement that increases the likelihood of future re-
that can become conditioned stimuli. sponding.

Secondary Qualities Characteristics of objects (e.g., Self-Reports People’s judgments and statements about
color, sound) that depend on individuals’ senses and themselves.
cognitions.
Self-Schema Manifestation of enduring goals, aspira-
Secondary Reinforcement Process whereby a behav- tions, motives, and fears, which includes cognitive and
ioral consequence (e.g., money) becomes reinforcing affective evaluations of ability, volition, and personal
by being paired with a primary reinforcer (e.g., food). agency.

Self-Actualization The desire for self-fulfillment or for Self-Worth Perceptions of one’s value, grounded largely
becoming everything one is capable of becoming; the in beliefs about ability.
highest level in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
Semantic Memory Memory of general information and
Self-Concept One’s collective self-perceptions that are concepts available in the environment and not tied to a
formed through experiences with, and interpretations particular individual or context.
of, the environment and that are heavily influenced by
reinforcements and evaluations by significant other Sensorimotor Stage First of Piaget’s stages of cognitive
persons. development, encompassing birth to roughly age 2.

Self-Confidence The extent that one believes one can Sensory Register State of information processing con-
produce results, accomplish goals, or perform tasks cerned with receiving inputs, holding them briefly
competently (analogous to Self-Efficacy). in sensory form, and transferring them to working
memory.
Self-Determination Motive aimed at developing com-
petence, which begins as undifferentiated but eventu- Serial Recall Recalling stimuli in the order in which they
ally differentiates into specific areas. are presented.

Self-Efficacy (Efficacy Expectations) Personal beliefs Shaping Differential reinforcement of successive ap-
concerning one’s capabilities to organize and imple- proximations to the desired rate or form of behavior.
ment actions necessary to learn or perform behaviors
at designated levels. Short-Term (Working) Memory (STM or WM)
Information processing stage corresponding to aware-
Self-Esteem One’s perceived sense of self-worth; ness, or what one is conscious of at a given moment.
whether one accepts and respects oneself.
Simulation Real or imaginary situation that cannot be
Self-Evaluation Process involving self-judgments of brought into a learning setting.
current performance by comparing it to one’s goal
and self-reactions to these judgments by deeming Situated Cognition (Learning) Idea that thinking is sit-
performance noteworthy, unacceptable, and so uated (located) in physical and social contexts.
forth.
Social Cognitive Theory Cognitive theory that empha-
Self-Evaluative Standards Standards people use to sizes the role of the social environment in learning.
evaluate their performances.
Social Comparison Process of comparing one’s beliefs
Self-Instruction In a learning setting, discriminative and behaviors with those of others.
stimuli that are produced by the individual and
that set the occasion for responses leading to rein- Social Constructivism Constructivist perspective em-
forcement. phasizing the importance of the individual’s social in-
teractions in the acquisition of skills and knowledge.
Self-Instructional Training Instructional procedure
that comprises cognitive modeling, overt guidance, Socially Mediated Learning Learning influenced by as-
overt self-guidance, faded overt self-guidance, and pects of the sociocultural environment.
covert self-instruction.
Socioeconomic Status (SES) Descriptive term denoting
Self-Judgment Comparing one’s current performance one’s capital (resources, assets).
level with one’s goal.
Specific Skill Skill applying only to certain domains
Self-Modeling Changes in behaviors, thoughts, and (e.g., regrouping in subtraction).
affects that derive from observing one’s own perfor-
mances. Spinal Cord That part of the central nervous system that
connects the brain to the rest of the body.
Self-Monitoring (-Observation, -Recording) Deliberate
attention to some aspect of one’s behavior, often Spiral Curriculum Building on prior knowledge by
accompanied by recording its frequency or intensity. presenting the same topics at increasing levels of com-
plexity as students move through schooling.
Self-Reaction Changes in one’s beliefs and behaviors
after judging performance against a goal. Spontaneous Recovery Sudden recurrence of the
conditioned response following presentation of
the conditioned stimulus after a time lapse in which
the conditioned stimulus is not presented.

Glossary 499

Spreading Activation Activation in long-term memory Theory Scientifically acceptable set of principles offered
of propositions that are associatively linked with mate- to explain a phenomenon.
rial currently in one’s working memory.
Think-Aloud Research procedure in which participants
SQ3R Method (Survey-Question-Read-Recite (Recall)- verbalize aloud their thoughts, actions, and feelings
Review) Method of studying text that stands for while performing a task.
Survey-Question-Read-Recite-Review; modified to
SQ4R with addition of Reflection. Three-Term Contingency The basic operant model of
conditioning: A discriminative stimulus sets the occa-
Steroid A type of hormone that can affect various func- sion for a response to be emitted, which is followed by
tions including sexual development and stress reactions. a reinforcing stimulus.

Stimulated Recall Research procedure in which people Threshold Method of Behavioral Change Altering be-
work on a task and afterward recall their thoughts at havior by introducing the cue for the undesired re-
various points; the procedure may include videotaping. sponse at a low level and gradually increasing its mag-
nitude until it is presented at full strength.
Stimulus-Response (S-R) Theory Learning theory em-
phasizing associations between stimuli and responses. Time Needed for Learning Amount of academically
engaged time required by a student to learn a task.
Strategy Value Information Information linking strat-
egy use with improved performance. Time-Out (From Reinforcement) Removal of an indi-
vidual from a situation where reinforcement can be
Structural Theories of Development Theories posit- obtained.
ing that development consists of changes in mental
structures. Time-Sampling Measure Measure of how often a be-
havior occurs during an interval of a longer period.
Structuralism Doctrine postulating that the mind is
composed of associations of ideas and that studying Time Spent in Learning Amount of academically en-
the complexities of the mind requires breaking associ- gaged time expended to learn.
ations into single ideas.
Tools The objects, language, and social institutions of a
Successive Approximations See Shaping. culture.
Sum Model Counting method in which one counts in
Top-Down Processing Pattern recognition of stimuli
the first addend and then the second one. that occurs by forming a meaningful representation of
Surface Structure The speech and syntax of a language. the context, developing expectations of what will
Syllogism Deductive reasoning problem that includes occur, and comparing features of stimuli to expecta-
tions to confirm or disconfirm one’s expectations.
premises and a conclusion containing all, no, or some.
Symbolic Representation Representing knowledge Trace Decay Loss of a stimulus from the sensory register
over time.
with symbol systems (e.g., language, mathematical no-
tation). Transfer (Generalization) Application of skills or
Synapse Point where axons and dendrites meet in the knowledge in new ways or situations.
brain.
Synaptic Gap. Space between axons and dendrites into Translation Aspect of writing involving putting one’s
which neurotransmitters are released. ideas into print.
Synchronous Learning Real-time interactions.
Systematic Desensitization Therapeutic procedure Triadic Reciprocality Reciprocal interactions (causal re-
used to extinguish fears by pairing threatening stimuli lations) among behaviors, environmental variables,
with cues for relaxation. and cognitions and other personal factors.
Tabula Rasa Native state of a learner (blank tablet).
TARGET Acronym representing classroom motivation Trial and Error Learning by performing a response and
variables: task, authority, recognition, grouping, evalu- experiencing the consequences.
ation, time.
Task Involvement Motivational state characterized by Tuning Modification and refinement of schemata as they
viewing learning as a goal and focusing on task de- are used in various contexts.
mands rather than on oneself.
Technology The designs and environments that engage Tutoring A situation in which one or more persons
learners. serve as the instructional agents for another, usually in
Template Matching Theory of perception postulating a specific subject or for a particular purpose
that people store templates (miniature copies of stim-
uli) in memory and compare these templates with en- Two-Store (Dual) Memory Model of Information
vironmental stimuli during perception. Processing Conceptualization of memory as involv-
Temporal Lobe Brain lobe responsible for processing ing stages of processing and having two primary
auditory information. areas for storing information (short- and long-term
Teratogen A foreign substance that can cause abnormal- memory).
ities in a developing embryo or fetus.
Thalamus Part of the brain that sends sensory inputs Type R Behavior See Operant Behavior.
(except for smell) to the cortex. Type S Behavior See Respondent Behavior.
Unconditional Positive Regard Attitudes of worthiness

and acceptance with no conditions attached.
Unconditioned Response (UCR) The response elicited

by an unconditioned stimulus.
Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) A stimulus that

when presented elicits a natural response from the
organism.

500 Glossary

Undifferentiated Task Structure Class situation in which Volitional Style Stable individual differences in volition.
all students work on the same or similar tasks and in- Wernicke’s Area Brain part in the left hemisphere that
struction uses a small number of materials or methods.
is involved in speech comprehension and use of
Unidimensional Classroom Classroom having few ac- proper syntax when speaking.
tivities that address a limited range of student abilities. Will That part of the mind that reflects one’s desire,
want, or purpose.
Unitary Theory Theory postulating that all information Worked Example Step-by-step problem solution that
is represented in long-term memory in verbal codes. may include diagrams.
Working Backward Problem-solving strategy in which
Unlearning See Forgetting. one starts with the goal and asks which subgoals are
Utilization The use made of parsed sound patterns necessary to accomplish it, what is necessary to ac-
complish these subgoals, and so forth, until the begin-
(e.g., store in memory, respond if a question, or seek ning state is reached.
additional information). Working Forward Problem-solving strategy in which
Utilization Deficiency Failure to use a strategy of one starts with the beginning problem state and de-
which one is cognitively aware. cides how to alter it to progress toward the goal.
Value The perceived importance or usefulness of Working Memory (WM) See Short-Term Memory.
learning. Working Self-Concept Those self-schemas that are
Verbal Behavior Vocal responses shaped and main- mentally active at any time; currently accessible self-
tained by the actions of other persons. knowledge.
Vicarious Learning Learning that occurs without overt Written Responses Performances on tests, quizzes, home-
performance, such as by observing live or symbolic work, term papers, reports, and computer documents.
models. X-Ray High frequency electromagnetic waves used to
Video Deficit Poorer learning by young children from determine abnormalities in solid body structures.
video compared with real-life experiences. Zero Transfer One type of learning has no obvious ef-
Virtual Reality Computer-based technology that incor- fect on subsequent learning.
porates input and output devices and that allows stu- Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) The amount of
dents to experience and interact with an artificial envi- learning possible by a student given the proper in-
ronment as if it were the real world. structional conditions.
Visual Cortex Occipital lobe of the brain.
Volition The act of using the will; the process of dealing
with the implementation of actions to attain goals.

References

Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Anand, P. G., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted
Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformula- instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elemen-
tion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74. tary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology,
79, 72–78.
Ackerman, S. (1992). Discovering the brain. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press. Anderman, E. M. (1998). The middle school experience:
Effects on the math and science achievement of adoles-
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. cents with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31,
Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150. 128–138.

Akamatsu, T. J., & Thelen, M. H. (1974). A review of the litera- Anderman, E. M., Austin, C. C., & Johnson, D. M. (2002). The
ture on observer characteristics and imitation. Developmental development of goal orientation. In A. Wigfield & J. S.
Psychology, 10, 38–47. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.
197–220). San Diego: Academic Press.
Alderman, M. K. (1985). Achievement motivation and the pre-
service teacher. In M. K. Alderman & M. W. Cohen (Eds.), Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and
Motivation theory and practice for preservice teachers schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational
(pp. 37–51). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Research, 64, 287–309.
Education.
Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and
Alderman, M. K. (1999). Motivation for achievement: affects: Influences on student motivation. In P. A.
Possibilities for teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational
Erlbaum. psychology (2nd ed., pp. 369–389). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Alexander, J. E., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Anderson, J. R. (1980). Concepts, propositions, and schemata:
Development of metacognition in gifted children: What are the cognitive units? In J. H. Flowers (Ed.),
Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1980 (Vol. 28, pp.
1–37. 121–162). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). Profiling the differ- Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill.
ences in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategic plan- Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.
ning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435–447.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of mem-
Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development ory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22,
of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investi- 261–295.
gation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 95, 1–13. Anderson, J. R. (1984). Spreading activation. In J. R. Anderson
& S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory:
American Psychological Association (1992). Special issue: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp. 61–90). San
Reflections on B. F. Skinner and psychology. American Francisco: Freeman.
Psychologist, 47, 1269–1533.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implica-
American Psychological Association Work Group of the tions (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
Board of Educational Affairs (1997). Learner-centered psy-
chological principles. Washington, DC: Author. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning.
American Psychologist, 48, 35–44.
Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic
goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In R. Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cog-
Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in educa- nition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365.
tion (Vol. 1, pp. 177–208). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated
Ames, C. (1985). Attributions and cognitions in motivation approach (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Ander
theory. In M. K. Alderman & M. W. Cohen (Eds.),
Motivation theory and practice for preservice teachers Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S.,
(pp. 16–21). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the
Teacher Education. mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.

Ames, C. (1987). The enhancement of student motivation. In Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The
M. L. Maehr & D. A. Kleiber (Eds.), Advances in motivation role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive
and achievement (Vol. 5, pp. 123–148). Greenwich, CT: JAI skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Press. Memory, and Cognition, 23, 932–945.

Ames, C. (1992a). Achievement goals and the classroom mo- Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Lebiere, C. (1996). Working
tivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive
Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Psychology, 30, 221–256.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated
Ames, C. (1992b). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4),
motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. 5–11.

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the class- Anderson, L. W. (1976). An empirical investigation of individ-
room: Student learning strategies and motivation ual differences in time to learn. Journal of Educational
processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, Psychology, 68, 226–233.
260–267.
Anderson, L. W. (2003). Benjamin S. Bloom: His life, his
works, and his legacy. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk

501

502 References

(Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A
(pp. 367–389). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. proposed system and its control processes. In K. W.
Anderson, R. C. (1982). Allocation of attention during read- Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning
ing. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse process- and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2,
ing (pp. 292–305). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
Company.
Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-
unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82–90.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, T. Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000).
E. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the
American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381. worked examples research. Review of Educational
Andersson, U., & Lyxell, B. (2007). Working memory deficit in Research, 70, 181–214.
children with mathematical difficulties: A general or spe-
cific deficit? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, Atkinson, R. K., & Renkl, A. (2007). Interactive example-
197–228. based learning environments: Using interactive elements
Andre, T. (1986). Problem solving and education. In G. D. to encourage effective processing of worked examples.
Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: Educational Psychology Review, 19, 375–386.Atkin
Understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp.
169–204). Orlando: Academic Press. Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003).
Andrews, G. R., & Debus, R. L. (1978). Persistence and the Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems:
causal perception of failure: Modifying cognitive attribu- Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out
tions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 154–166. steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774–783.
Armstrong, D. G., & Savage, T. V. (2002). Teaching in the sec-
ondary school: An introduction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford,
River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. England: Oxford University Press.
Aronson, E. (1966). The psychology of insufficient justifica-
tion: An analysis of some conflicting data. In S. Feldman Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal
(Ed.), Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and learning: An introduction to school learning. New York:
behavioral consequences (pp. 109–133). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Academic Press.
Asher, J. W. (2003). The rise to prominence: Educational psy- Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive
chology 1920–1960. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
(Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions
(pp. 189–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Ausubel, D. P. (1977). The facilitation of meaningful verbal
Ashton, P. T. (1985). Motivation and the teacher’s sense of ef- learning in the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 12,
ficacy. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motiva- 162–178.
tion in education. Vol. 2: The classroom milieu (pp.
141–171). Orlando: Academic Press. Ausubel, D. P. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48,
Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New 251–257.
York: Longman.
Assor, A., & Connell, J. P. (1992). The validity of students’ self- Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). School learning: An
reports as measures of performance affecting self-ap- introduction to educational psychology. New York: Holt,
praisals. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student per- Rinehart & Winston.
ceptions in the classroom (pp. 25–47). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum. Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. (1968). The token economy: A motiva-
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-tak- tional system for therapy and rehabilitation. New York:
ing behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1978). Introduction to motiva-
tion (2nd ed.). New York: D. Van Nostrand. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacogni-
Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achieve- tive tools for enhancing learning. Educational
ment motivation. New York: Wiley. Psychologist, 40, 193–197.
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (1974). Motivation and
achievement. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (1978). Personality, motiva- tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regu-
tion, and achievement. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. lated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language
learning. American Psychologist, 30, 828–921. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-
Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hyper-
mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian media? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.
vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Learning and Memory, 104, 126–133. Azevedo, R., Greene, J. A., & Moos, D. C. (2007). The effect of
a human agent’s external regulation upon college students’
hypermedia learning. Metacognition & Learning, 2, 67–87.

Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of
self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual
understanding of complex systems with hypermedia.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 85–109.

Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamina-
tion of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for memory re-
search. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.

Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255,
556–559.

Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice
(Rev. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working?
American Psychologist, 56, 851–864.

References 503

Bailey, T. (1993). Can youth apprenticeship thrive in the Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli,
United States? Educational Researcher, 22(3), 4–10. C. (1996). Multifacted impact of self-efficacy beliefs
on academic functioning. Child Development, 67,
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, 1206–1222.
and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1,
3–38. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C.
(2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspira-
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and tions and career trajectories. Child Development, 72,
reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading re- 187–206.
search (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
Bandura, A., & Bussey, K. (2004). On broadening the cogni-
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). tive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing
Mathematics. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of re- about gender development and functioning: Comment on
search on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, Martin, Ruble, and Szkrybalo (2002). Psychological
DC: American Educational Research Association. Bulletin, 130, 691–701.

Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-
York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of
goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. 45, 1017–1028.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement
Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation.
theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
191–215. 38, 92–113.

Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Bandura, A., & Jeffery, R. W. (1973). Role of symbolic coding
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. and rehearsal processes in observational learning. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 122–130.
Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental
analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns
Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible fu- of self-reinforcement through modeling. Journal of
tures (pp. 200–239). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 1–9.
University Press.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-
Bandura, A. (1982a). The self and mechanisms of agency. In mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and
J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, Social Psychology, 66, 3–11.
pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence,
Bandura, A. (1982b). Self-efficacy mechanism in human self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-
agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
41, 586–598.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and ac-
tion: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and per-
Prentice Hall. sonality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Winston.
Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action
through goal systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. Bangert, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1983).
H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and mo- Individualized systems of instruction in secondary schools.
tivation (pp. 37–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Review of Educational Research, 53, 143–158.
Academic Publishers.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004).
Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through an- The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions
ticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In R. A. Dienstbier on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of
(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990 (Vol. 38, Educational Research, 74, 29–58.
69–164). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism:
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive devel- On the automaticity of higher mental processes.
opment and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925–945.
117–148.
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we
Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and the exercise apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer.
of control over HIV infection. In R. DiClemente & J. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.
Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of
behavioral interventions (pp. 25–59). New York: Plenum. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental
and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. University Press.
New York: Freeman.
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Devecchio, E., & Anders, J. A.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic per- (1991). A developmental comparison of the effectiveness
spective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. of encoding tasks. Genetic, Social, and General
Psychology Monographs, 117, 419–436.
Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health
promotion. Applied Psychology: An International Review, Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W.
54, 245–254. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp.
349–378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy
theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Beal, C. R., & Belgrad, S. L. (1990). The development of mes-
Research, 1, 287–308. sage evaluation skills in young children. Child
Development, 61, 705–712.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive
processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 125–139.

504 References

Beal, C. R., Garrod, A. C., & Bonitatibus, G. J. (1990). Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-
Fostering children’s revision skills through training in com- related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career op-
prehension monitoring. Journal of Educational tions in college women and men. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 82, 275–280. Psychology, 28, 399–410.

Becker, W. C. (1971). Parents are teachers: A child manage- Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathemat-
ment program. Champaign, IL: Research Press. ics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based
college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 329–345.
Begley, S. (2007, January 29). How the brain rewires itself.
Time, 169, 72–74, 77, 79. Bierman, K L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Gest, S. D.,
Welsh, J. A., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., Nelson, K. E., &
Belfiore, P. J., & Hornyak, R. S. (1998). Operant theory and Gill, S. (2008). Promoting academic and social-emotional
application to self-monitoring in adolescents. In D. H. school readiness: The Head Start REDI Program. Child
Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: Development, 79, 1802–1817.
From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 184–202).
New York: Guilford Press. Binney, R., & Janson, M. (Eds.) (1990). Atlas of the mind and
body. London: Mitchell Beazley Publishers.
Bellini, S., & Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video
modeling and video self-modeling interventions for chil- Birnbaum, J. C. (1982). The reading and composing behav-
dren and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. iors of selected fourth- and seventh-grade students.
Exceptional Children, 73, 264–287. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 241–260.

Belmont, J. M. (1989). Cognitive strategies and strategic learn- Black, J. B. (1984). Understanding and remembering stories.
ing: The socio-instructional approach. American In J. R. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in
Psychologist, 44, 142–148. learning and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower
(pp. 235–255). San Francisco: Freeman.
Bempechat, J., London, P., & Dweck, C. S. (1991). Children’s
conceptions of ability in major domains: An interview and Block, J. H., & Burns, R. B. (1977). Mastery learning. In L. S.
experimental study. Child Study Journal, 21, 11–36. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 4, pp.
3–49). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
Benight, C. C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive
theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002).
self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning
1129–1148. reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational
Research, 72, 101–130.
Benjamin, L. T., Jr. (1988). A history of teaching machines.
American Psychologist, 43, 703–712. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learn-
ing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Benjamin, L. T., Jr. (2000). The psychological laboratory at the
turn of the 20th century. American Psychologist, 55, Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971).
318–321. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of stu-
dent learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Benjamin, L. T., Jr., Durkin, M., Link, M., Vestal, M., & Acord,
J. (1992). Wundt’s American doctoral students. American Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation:
Psychologist, 47, 123–131. Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 84, 272–281.
Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In L. W. Gregg &
E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. Boersma, E J., & Chapman, J. W. (1981). Academic self-con-
73–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. cept, achievement expectations, and locus of control in el-
ementary learning-disabled children. Canadian Journal of
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Behavioural Science, 13, 349–358.
Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21–23.
Bong, M., & Clark, R. (1999). Comparisons between self-
Berk, L. E. (1986). Relationship of elementary school chil- concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research.
dren’s private speech to behavioral accompaniment to Educational Psychologist, 34, 139–154.
task, attention, and task performance. Developmental
Psychology, 22, 671–680. Borkowski, J. G. (1985). Signs of intelligence: Strategy gener-
alization and metacognition. In S. Yussen (Ed.), The
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New growth of reflection in children (pp. 105–144). New York:
York: McGraw-Hill. Academic Press.

Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Motivational problems raised by ex- Borkowski, J. G., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (1979). Maintenance and
ploratory and epistemic behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.), generalization of skills and strategies by the retarded. In N.
Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 5, pp. 284–364). New R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency, psychologi-
York: McGraw-Hill. cal theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 569–617). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A.,
Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Borkowski, J. G., Johnston, M. B., & Reid, M. K. (1987).
Metacognition, motivation, and controlled performance. In
Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interac- S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neu-
tion treatments in distance education. Review of ropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 2, pp.
Educational Research, 79, 1243–1289. 147–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (2006). Parallel distributed pro-
A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). cessing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recog-
How does distance education compare with classroom in- nition: Are a few stages necessary? Psychological Review,
struction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. 113, 181–195.
Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991).
Bernier, M., & Avard, J. (1986). Self-efficacy, outcome, and at- Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance
trition in a weight-reduction program. Cognitive Therapy
and Research, 10, 319–338.

References 505

among junior and senior high-school age students. Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 43–57).
International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
153–164. Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for op-
Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1992). Cognitive psychology: A brief erant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B.
overview. Psychological Science Agenda, 5(5), 5, 20. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the sym-
Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the bolic processes (pp. 1–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in
Psychology, 49, 229–240. memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.
Bousfield, W. A., & Cohen, B. H. (1953). The effects of rein- Brigham, T. A. (1982). Self-management: A radical behavioral
forcement on the occurrence of clustering in the recall of perspective. In P. Karoly & F. H. Kanfer (Eds.), Self-man-
randomly arranged associates. Journal of Psychology, 36, agement and behavior change: From theory to practice
67–81. (pp. 32–59). New York: Pergamon.
Bouton, M. E., Nelson, J. B., & Rosas, J. M. (1999). Stimulus Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-manage-
generalization, context change, and forgetting. ment practices on college grades. Journal of Educational
Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171–186. Psychology, 83, 405–410.
Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication.
(5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. London: Pergamon.
Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in nar- Broadhurst, P. L. (1957). Emotionality and the Yerkes-Dodson
rative comprehension. Science, 247, 44–48. Law. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 345–352.
Bowers, J. S. (2009). On the biological plausibility of grand- Brody, G. H., & Stoneman, Z. (1985). Peer imitation: An ex-
mother cells: Implications for neural network theories in amination of status and competence hypotheses. Journal
psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Review, 116, of Genetic Psychology, 146, 161–170.
220–251. Brodzinsky, D. M. (1982). Relationship between cognitive
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. style and cognitive development: A 2-year longitudinal
(2002). Observational learning and the effects of model- study. Developmental Psychology, 18, 617–626.
observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human develop-
405–415. ment: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA:
Bradford, H. F. (1998). Neurotransmitters and neuromodula- Harvard University Press.
tors. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understand-
mind (pp. 550–560). Oxford, England: Oxford University ing: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA:
Press. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status Brophy, J. E. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis.
and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, Review of Educational Research, 51, 5–32.
371–399. Brophy, J. E. (1985). Teacher-student interaction. In J. B.
Brainerd, C. J. (2003). Jean Piaget, learning research, and Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 303–328).
American education. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher-student relation-
(pp. 251–287). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. ships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prereq- & Winston.
uisites for understanding: Some investigations of compre- Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading.
hension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical
Behavior, 11, 717–726. issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–481). Hillsdale,
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: NJ: Erlbaum.
A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran- Brown, A. L., Palincsar, A. S., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984).
Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in educa- Instructing comprehension-fostering activities in interac-
tion (Vol. 24, pp. 61–100). Washington, DC: American tive learning situations. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T.
Educational Research Association. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp.
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem 255–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and cre- Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (1007). A temporal
ativity. New York: Freeman. ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114,
Bransford, J. D., Stein, B. S., Vye, N. J., Franks, J. J., Auble, P. 539–576.
M., Mezynski, K. J., & Perfetto, G. A. (1982). Differences in Brown, I., Jr., & Inouye, D. K. (1978). Learned helplessness
approaches to learning: An overview. Journal of through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in com-
Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 390–398. petence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36,
Bredo, E. (1997). The social construction of learning. In G. 900–908.
Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: The construc- Brown, J. (1968). Reciprocal facilitation and impairment of
tion of knowledge (pp. 3–45). New York: Academic Press. free recall. Psychonomic Science, 10, 41–42.
Bredo, E. (2003). The development of Dewey’s psychology. Brown, J. S. (2006, September/October). New learning envi-
In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational ronments for the 21st century: Exploring the edge. Change,
psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 81–111). 38, 18–24.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for
Bredo, E. (2006). Conceptual confusion and educational psy- procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive
chology. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Science, 2, 155–192.

506 References

Brown, S. C., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Encoding and retrieval Byrnes, J. P., & Fox, N. A. (1998). The educational relevance
of information. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The of research in cognitive neuroscience. Educational
Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 93–108). New York: Psychology Review, 10, 297–342.
Oxford University Press.
Calfee, R. (1981). Cognitive psychology and educational prac-
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: tice. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in educa-
Vintage. tion (Vol. 9, pp. 3–73). Washington, DC: American
Educational Research Association.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard
Educational Review, 31, 21–32. Calfee, R., & Drum, P. (1986). Research on teaching reading.
In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching
Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. (3rd ed., pp. 804–849). New York: Macmillan.
American Psychologist, 19, 1–15.
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward,
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of
York: Norton. Educational Research, 64, 363–423.

Bruner, J. S. (1984). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal develop- Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (2002). Rewards and intrinsic
ment: The hidden agenda. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch motivation: Resolving the controversy. Westport, CT:
(Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal devel- Bergin & Garvey.
opment” (pp. 93–97). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal,
Bruner, J. S. (1985). Models of the learner. Educational M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive
Researcher, 14(6), 5–8. and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early child-
hood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology,
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of 37, 231–242.
thinking. New York: Wiley.
Campbell, G. (2006, September/October). Education, infor-
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies mation technologies, and the augmentation of human in-
in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley. tellect. Change, 38, 26–31.

Bruning, R. H., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., & Bryant, N. R.
write. Educational Psychologist, 35, 25–37. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications
for individual differences and learning. In B. Rogoff & J. V.
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Norby, M. M., & Ronning, R. R. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proxi-
(2004). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). mal development” (pp. 77–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social
Brunton, M. (2007, January 29). What do babies know? Time, intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
169, 94–95.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P.
Bryan, J. H., & Bryan, T. H. (1983). The social life of the (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job sat-
learning disabled youngster. In J. D. McKinney & L. isfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821–832.
Feagans (Eds.), Current topics in learning disabilities (Vol.
1, pp. 57–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio,
G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal
Bryan, J. H., & Walbek, N. H. (1970). Preaching and practic- analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regu-
ing generosity: Children’s actions and reactions. Child lated learning in academic continuance and achievement.
Development, 41, 329–353. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 515–534.

Bryan, T., Cosden, M., & Pearl, R. (1982). The effects of coop- Carlson, R., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Learning and
erative goal structures and cooperative models on LD and understanding science instructional material. Journal of
NLD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 415–421. Educational Psychology, 95, 629–640.

Butkowsky, I. S., & Willows, D. M. (1980). Cognitive-motiva- Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still
tional characteristics of children varying in reading ability: improve students’ learning from text. Educational
Evidence for learned helplessness in poor readers. Journal Psychology Review, 14, 5–26.
of Educational Psychology, 72, 408–422.
Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1995). Language
Butler, D. L. (1998a). The strategic content learning approach comprehension: Sentence and discourse processing.
to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 91–120.
studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 682–697.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers
Butler, D. L. (1998b). A strategic content learning approach to College Record, 64, 723–733.
promoting self-regulated learning by students with learn-
ing disabilities. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Carroll, J. B. (1965). School learning over the long haul. In J.
Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective D. Krumboltz (Ed.), Learning and the educational process
practice (pp. 160–183). New York: Guilford Press. (pp. 249–269). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Butler, R. (1992). What young people want to know when: Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospec-
Effects of mastery and ability goals on interest in different tive and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1),
kinds of social comparisons. Journal of Personality and 26–31.
Social Psychology, 62, 934–943.
Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1982). The role of visual moni-
Butler, R. (1998). Age trends in the use of social and temporal toring in observational learning of action patterns: Making
comparison for self-evaluation: Examination of a novel de- the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior,
velopmental hypothesis. Child Development, 69, 1054–1073. 14, 153–167.

Byrnes, J. P. (1996). Cognitive development and learning in Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of
instructional contexts. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. positive and negative affect: A control-process view.
Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.
Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Minds, brains, and learning: Under-
standing the psychological and educational relevance of
neuroscientific research. New York: Guilford Press.

References 507

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The na-
behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. ture of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of be- Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in prob-
havioral self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & lem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psy-
M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. chology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale,
41–84). San Diego: Academic Press. NJ: Erlbaum.

Case, R. (1978a). A developmentally based theory and tech- Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. R. (1979). Acquisition of
nology of instruction. Review of Educational Research, 48, domain-related information in relation to high and low do-
439–463. main knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 18, 257–274.
Case, R. (1978b). Piaget and beyond: Toward a developmen-
tally based theory and technology of instruction. In R. Childs, C. P., & Greenfield, P. M. (1981). Informal modes of
Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, learning and teaching: The case of Zincanteco weaving. In
pp. 167–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol.
2, pp. 269–319). London: Academic Press.
Case, R. (1981). Intellectual development: A systematic rein-
terpretation. In F. H. Farley & N. J. Gordon (Eds.), Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Conceptual
Psychology and education: The state of the union (pp. change—multiple routes, multiple mechanisms: A commen-
142–177). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. tary on Ohlsson (2009). Educational Psychologist, 44, 48–57.

Case, R. (1993). Theories of learning and theories of develop- Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague:
ment. Educational Psychologist, 28, 219–233. Mouton.

Ceci, S. J. (1989). On domain specificity . . . More or less gen- Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F.
eral and specific constraints on cognitive development. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58.
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 131–142.
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language:
Cervone, D., Jiwani, N., & Wood, R. (1991). Goal setting and An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt
the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on Brace Jovanovich.
complex decision-making performance. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 257–266. Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Psychological processes
as linguistic explanation. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse
Chan, W., Lau, S., Nie, Y., Lim, S., & Hogan, D. (2008). production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood, NJ:
Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commit- Ablex.
ment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identifi-
cation with school. American Educational Research Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and edu-
Journal, 45, 597–630. cation. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.

Chapin, M., & Dyck, D. G. (1976). Persistence in children’s Clark, K. (2008, January 21). New answers for e-learning. U.
reading behavior as a function of N length and attribution S. News & World Report, 144, 46, 48–50.
retraining. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 511–515.
Clark, R. E., & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M.
Chapman, J. W. (1988). Learning disabled children’s self-con- C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd
cepts. Review of Educational Research, 58, 347–371. ed., pp. 464–478). New York: Macmillan.

Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of Cleary, T. J., Zimmerman, B. J., & Keating, T. (2006). Training
young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of physical education students to self-regulate during basket-
emerging subcomponents and their relationship with read- ball free throw practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise
ing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, and sport, 77, 251–262.
154–167.
Clifford, R. M., Early, D. M., & Hill, T. (1999). About a million
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon Effect: children in school before kindergarten. Young Children,
The perception-behavior link and social interaction. 54, 48–51.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
Coates, B., & Hartup, W. W. (1969). Age and verbalization in ob-
Chen, P. P. (2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability servational learning. Developmental Psychology, 1, 556–562.
of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics
students. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 77–90. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and socio-
cultural perspectives on mathematical development.
Chen, Z. (1999). Schema induction in children’s analogical Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,
703–715. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning
perspectives in theory and practice. Educational
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of Researcher, 28(2), 4–15,
speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 25, 975–979. Cofer, C. N., Bruce, D. R., & Reicher, G. M. (1966). Clustering
in free recall as a function of certain methodological varia-
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & tions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 858–866.
Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study
and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions
Science, 13, 145–182. for productive small groups. Review of Educational
Research, 64, 1–35.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981).
Categorization and representation of physics problems by Collins, A. (1977). Processes in acquiring knowledge. In R. C.
experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling
and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 339–363). Hillsdale,
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In NJ: Erlbaum.
R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-
processing approach (pp. 227–250). New York: Freeman. Collins, A., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation the-
ory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82,
407–428.

508 References

Collins, A., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from se- Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of
mantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal volition and educational research. Educational Researcher,
Behavior, 8, 240–247. 22(2), 14–22.

Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). A cognitive theory of in- Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes,
quiry teaching. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-de- influences, and practices. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
sign theories and models: An overview of their current sta- Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and perfor-
tus (pp. 247–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. mance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 229–251).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, J. L. (1982, March). Self-efficacy and ability in
achievement behavior. Paper presented at the annual Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning.
meeting of the American Educational Research In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated
Association, New York. learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspec-
tives (2nd ed., pp. 191–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E.
M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on Corno, L. (2008). Work habits and self-regulated learning:
parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Helping students to find a “will” from a “way.” In D. H.
Psychologist, 55, 218–232. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-
regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications
Comer, J. P. (2001, April 23). Schools that develop children. (pp. 197–222). New York: Taylor & Francis.
The American Prospect, 30–35.
Corno, L., & Kanfer, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning
Comer, J. P., & Haynes, N. M. (1999). The dynamics of school and performance. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of
change: Response to the article, “Comer’s School research in education (Vol. 19, pp. 301–341). Washington,
Development Program in Prince George’s County, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Maryland: A theory-based evaluation,” by Thomas D. Cook
et al. American Educational Research Journal, 36, Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned
599–607. about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. M.
McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp.
Cook, T. D., Habib, F., Phillips, M., Settersten, R. A., Shagle, S. 299–328). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
C., & Degirmencioglu, S. M. (1999). Comer’s School
Development Program in Prince George’s County, Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individ-
Maryland: A theory-based evaluation. American ual differences among learners. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),
Educational Research Journal, 36, 543–597. Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 605–629).
New York: Macmillan.
Cook, T. D., Murphy, R. F., & Hunt, H. D. (2000). Comer’s
School Development Program in Chicago: A theory-based Courage, M. L., & Setliff, A. E. (2009). Debating the impact of
evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, television and video material on very young children:
535–597. Attention, learning, and the developing brain. Child
Development Perspectives, 3, 72–78.
Cooper, A. J. R., & Monk, A. (1976). Learning for recall and
learning for recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and Covey, S. R. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people:
recognition (pp. 131–156). London: Wiley. Restoring the character ethic. New York: Simon and
Schuster.
Cooper, H. M., & Good, T. L. (1983). Pygmalion grows up:
Studies in the expectation communication process. New Covington, M. V. (1983). Motivated cognitions. In S. G. Paris,
York: Longman. G. M. Olson, & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and mo-
tivation in the classroom (pp. 139–164). Hillsdale, NJ:
Cooper, H. M., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does Erlbaum.
homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of
research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achieve-
1–62. ment motivation: Findings and implications. Elementary
School Journal, 85, 5–20.
Cooper, H. M., & Tom, D. Y. H. (1984). Teacher expectation
research: A review with implications for classroom instruc- Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth per-
tion. Elementary School Journal, 85, 77–89. spective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies
of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Covington, M. V. (2004). Self-worth theory goes to college: Or
Visual information processing (pp. 95–176). New York: do our motivation theories motivate? In D. M. McInerney &
Academic Press. S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 91–114).
Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2006). Hierarchical schemas and
goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Covington, M. V. (2009). Self-worth theory: Retrospection and
Review, 113, 887–916. prospects. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.),
Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 141–169). New
Cooper, W. H. (1983). An achievement motivation nomologi- York: Routledge.
cal network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
44, 841–861. Covington, M. V., & Beery, R. G. (1976). Self-worth and
school learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Corballis, M. C. (2006). Language. In K. Pawlik & G.
d’Ydewalle (Eds.), Psychological concepts: An inter- Covington, M. V., & Dray, E. (2002). The developmental
national historical perspective (pp. 197–221). New York: course of achievement motivation: A need-based approach.
Psychology Press. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achieve-
ment motivation (pp. 33–56). San Diego: Academic Press.
Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis.
In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1979). Effort: The double-
learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, edged sword in school achievement. Journal of
and practice (pp. 111–142). New York: Springer-Verlag. Educational Psychology, 71, 688–700.

References 509

Cowey, A. (1998). Localization of brain function and cortical Davidson, E. S., & Smith, W. P. (1982). Imitation, social com-
maps. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the parison, and self-reward. Child Development, 53, 928–932.
mind (pp. 436–438). Oxford, England: Oxford University
Press. de Beaugrande, R. (1984). Text production: Toward a science
of composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cox, B. D. (1997). The rediscovery of the active learner in
adaptive contexts: A developmental-historical analysis of de Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affec-
transfer of training. Educational Psychologist, 32, 41–55. tive determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.

Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Human memory. Annual Review of de Charms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation: Change in the
Psychology, 30, 63–102. classroom. New York: Irvington.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: de Charms, R. (1984). Motivation enhancement in educational
A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal settings. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on moti-
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. vation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 275–310). Orlando:
Academic Press.
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and
the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination.

Crisafi, M. A., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Analogical transfer in Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
very young children: Combining two separately learned Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-ana-
solutions to reach a goal. Child Development, 57, 953–968.
lytic review of experiments examining the effects of ex-
Crouse, J. H. (1971). Retroactive interference in reading prose trinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological
materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 39–44. Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic re-
Crowley, K., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Explanation and general- wards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered
ization in young children’s strategy learning. Child once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.
Development, 70, 304–316. Deci, E. L., & Moller, A. C. (2005). The concept of compe-
tence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motiva-
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. tion and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In A. J. Elliot
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and moti-
vation (pp. 579–597). New York: Guilford Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measure- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to
ment of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emer- self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.),
gent motivation. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium Nebraska symposium on motivation 1990 (Vol. 38, pp.
on motivation 1992 (Vol. 40, pp. 57–97). Lincoln, NE: 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
University of Nebraska Press. DeGrandpre, R. J. (2000). A science of meaning: Can behav-
iorism bring meaning to psychological science? American
Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. Psychologist, 55, 721–739.
(1988). The role of understanding in solving word prob- de Jong, P. F. (1998). Working memory deficits of reading dis-
lems. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405–438. abled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
70, 75–96.
Cuny, H. (1965). Pavlov: The man and his theories (P. Evans, de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discov-
Trans.). New York: Paul S. Eriksson. ery learning with computer simulations of conceptual do-
mains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
Dansereau, D. F. (1978). The development of a learning De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction
strategies curriculum. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Learning and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically
strategies (pp. 1–29). New York: Academic Press. diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 97, 139–156.
Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In C. DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three
E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable mea-
and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and sures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal
evaluation (pp. 103–120). San Diego: Academic Press. of Educational Psychology, 100, 223–234.
Dempster, F. N., & Corkill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhi-
Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Collins, K. W., Garland, J., bition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for edu-
Holley, C. D., Diekhoff, G. M., & Evans, S. H. (1979). cational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11,
Evaluation of a learning strategy system. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr., 1–88.
& C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Cognitive and affective learn- Denney, D. R. (1975). The effects of exemplary and cognitive
ing strategies (pp. 3–43). New York: Academic Press. models and self-rehearsal on children’s interrogative strate-
gies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19,
Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T., & Crowder, R. G. (1972). An au- 476–488.
ditory analogue of the Sperling partial report procedure: Denney, N. W., & Turner, M. C. (1979). Facilitating cogni-
Evidence for brief auditory storage. Cognitive Psychology, tive performance in children: A comparison of strategy
3, 255–267. modeling and strategy modeling with overt self-verbal-
ization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28,
Daugherty, M., & White, C. S. (2008). Relationships among 119–131.
private speech and creativity in Head Start and low-socio- Dermitzaki, I. (2005). Preliminary investigation of relations
economic status preschool children. Gifted Child between young students’ self-regulatory strategies and
Quarterly, 52, 30–39.

Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann,
H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory
revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of re-
cency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.

Davidson, E. S., & Benjamin, L. T., Jr. (1987). A history of the
child study movement in America. In J. A. Glover & R. R.
Ronning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psy-
chology (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum.

510 References

their metacognitive experiences. Psychological Reports, 97, Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans.).
759–768. Psychological Monographs, 58(5, Whole No. 270).
Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the construc-
tivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31, 163–174. Dunham, P. (1977). The nature of reinforcing stimuli. In W. K.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant be-
Psychological Review, 3, 357–370. havior (pp. 98–124). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dewey, J. (1900). Psychology and social practice.
Psychological Review, 7, 105–124. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching.
Dewsbury, D. A. (2000). Introduction: Snapshots of psychol- New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
ogy circa 1900. American Psychologist, 55, 255–259.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1985). The systematic design of instruc- Dusek, J. B. (Ed.) (1985). Teacher expectancies. Hillsdale, NJ:
tion (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Erlbaum.
DiClemente, C. C. (1981). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation
maintenance: A preliminary report. Cognitive Therapy and Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions
Research, 5, 175–187. in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of
DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Self-efficacy and the addictive be- Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685.
haviors. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4,
302–315. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learn-
DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., & Gilbertini, M. (1985). ing. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
Self-efficacy and the stages of self-change in smoking.
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 181–200. Dweck, C. S. (1991). Self-theories and goals: Their role in mo-
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned tivation, personality, and development. In R. A. Dienstbier
helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strat- (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990 (Vol. 38,
egy, and achievement cognitions following failure. pp. 199–235). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation,
helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor &
Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940–952. Francis.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educa-
tional technology: A review of the quantitative research lit- Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions.
erature on learner comprehension, control, and style. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achieve-
Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349. ment motivation (pp. 57–88). San Diego: Academic Press.
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008).
Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regu- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success.
lation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology New York: Random House.
Review, 20, 391–409.
DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S. W. (1988). Peer response Dweck, C. S., & Bempechat, J. (1983). Children’s theories of
groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations intelligence: Consequences for learning. In S. G. Paris,
and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 58, G. M. Olson, & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and mo-
119–149. tivation in the classroom (pp. 239–256). Hillsdale, NJ:
Dowrick, P. W. (1983). Self-modelling. In P. W. Dowrick & S. Erlbaum.
J. Biggs (Eds.), Using video: Psychological and social appli-
cations (pp. 105–124). Chichester, England: Wiley. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive ap-
Dowrick, P. W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related proach to motivation and personality. Psychological
interventions. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 8, 23–39. Review, 95, 256–273.
Dragoi, V., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1999). The dynamics of oper-
ant conditioning. Psychological Review, 106, 20–61. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2008). Self-theories motivate self-
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman
(1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the class- (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, re-
room. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. search, and applications (pp. 31–51). New York: Taylor &
Duchastel, P., & Brown, B. R. (1974). Incidental and relevant Francis.
learning with instructional objectives. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 66, 481–485. Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their im-
Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achieve- pact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J.
ment motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and
Educational Psychology, 84, 290–299. motivation (pp. 122–140). New York: Guilford Press.
Duell, O. K. (1986). Metacognitive skills. In G. D. Phye & T.
Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, Dweck, C. S., & Repucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness
thinking, and problem solving (pp. 205–242). Orlando: and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of
Academic Press. Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 109–116.
Duncan, R. M. (1995). Piaget and Vygotsky revisited:
Dialogue or assimilation? Developmental Review, 15, Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic be-
458–472. haviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achieve-
ment motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.

Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al.
model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C.
S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation
(pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford Press.

Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit:
Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young ado-
lescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on moti-
vation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). San Diego:
Academic Press.

Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. F. (1984). Grade-related
changes in the school environment: Effects on achieve-
ment motivation. In J. Nicholls (Ed.), Advances in motiva-
tion and achievement (Vol. 3, pp. 283–311). Greenwich,
CT: JAI Press.

References 511

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1985). Teacher expectations and Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The
student motivation. In J. B. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher ex- role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert per-
pectancies (pp. 185–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. formance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.

Elkind, D. (2004). The problem with constructivism. The Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New
Educational Forum, 68, 306–312. York: Norton.

Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barri-
goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), ers to change: Strategies for technology integration.
Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). Educational Technology Research & Development, 47,
New York: Guilford Press. 47–61.

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of Ertmer, P. A., Driscoll, M. P., & Wager, W. W. (2003). The
approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal legacy of Robert Mills Gagné. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H.
of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of con-
tributions (pp. 303–330). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and
avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A Estes, W. K. (1970). Learning theory and mental development.
mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social New York: Academic Press.
Psychology, 70, 461–475.
Estes, W. K. (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery, and
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. A 2 ¥ 2 achievement goal distortion. Psychological Review, 104, 148–169.
framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
80, 501–519. Evans, R. B. (2000). Psychological instruments at the turn of
the century. American Psychologist, 55, 322–325.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and
the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Evenson, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Glenn, J. (2001).
Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156, A qualitative study of six medical students in a problem-
based curriculum: Toward a situated model of self-regula-
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to tion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 659–676.
motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. Fabos, B., & Young, M. D. (1999). Telecommunication in the
classroom: Rhetoric versus reality. Review of Educational
Ellis, S., & Rogoff, B. (1982). The strategies and efficacy of Research, 69, 217–259.
child versus adult teachers. Child Development, 53, 730–735.
Falmagne, R. J., & Gonsalves, J. (1995). Deductive inference.
Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1978). Medical Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 525–559.
problem solving. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and stu-
Emmons, C. L., Comer, J. P., & Haynes, N. M. (1996). dents’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis.
Translating theory into practice: Comer’s theory of school Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.
reform. In J. P. Comer, N. M. Haynes, E. T. Joyner, & M.
Ben-Avie (Eds.), Rallying the whole village: The Comer Farnham-Diggory, S. (1992). Cognitive processes in education
process for reforming education (pp. 27–41). New York: (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Teachers College Press.
Faw, H. W., & Waller, T. G. (1976). Mathemagenic behaviours
Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., and efficiency in learning from prose materials: Review,
& Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk vis- critique and recommendations. Review of Educational
ible: Writing instruction in regular and special education Research, 46, 691–720.
classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28,
337–372. Feltz, D. L., Chase, M. A., Moritz, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (1999).
A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: Preliminary in-
Englund, M. M., Luckner, A. E., Whaley, G. J. L., & Egeland, vestigation and instrument development. Journal of
B. (2004). Children’s achievement in early elementary Educational Psychology, 91, 765–776.
school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, ex-
pectations, and quality of assistance. Journal of Ferster, C. S., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforce-
Educational Psychology, 96, 723–730. ment. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Ennemoser, M., & Schneider, W. (2007). Relations of televi- Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.
sion viewing and reading: Findings from a 4-year longitu- Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
dinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99,
349–368. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking disposi-
tions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Fillmore, L. W., & Valadez, C. (1986). Teaching bilingual
Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). learners. In M. W. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on
New York: Freeman. teaching (3rd ed., pp. 648–685). New York: Macmillan.

Epstein, J. L. (1989). Family structures and student motivation: Fincham, F. D., & Cain, K. M. (1986). Learned helplessness in
A developmental perspective. In C. Ames & R. Ames humans: A developmental analysis. Developmental Review,
(Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 6, 301–333.
259–295). San Diego: Academic Press.
Fischler, M. A., & Firschein, O. (1987). Intelligence: The eye,
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teach- the brain, and the computer. Reading, MA: Addison-
ing. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on Wesley.
teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Fish, M. C., & Pervan, R. (1985). Self-instruction training: A
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: potential tool for school psychologists. Psychology in the
Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, Schools, 22, 83–92.
725–747.
Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance.
Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review
of Educational Research, 57, 481–506.

512 References

Fitzgerald, J., & Markham, L. (1987). Teaching children about Fryer, J. W., & Elliot, A. J. (2008). Self-regulation of achieve-
revision in writing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 3–24. ment goal pursuit. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman
(Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, re-
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). search, and applications (pp. 53–75). New York: Taylor &
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Francis.

Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C.
knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making class-
50, 21–45. rooms more responsive to diversity. American
Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966).
Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a func- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Finelli, R., Courey, S. J., & Hamlett, C.
tion of age. Child Development, 37, 283–299. L. (2004). Expanding schema-based transfer instruction to
help third graders solve real-life mathematical problems.
Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). American Educational Research Journal, 41, 419–445.
Developmental changes in memorization processes.
Cognitive Psychology, 1, 324–340. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L.,
Owen, R., Hosp, M., & Jancek, D. (2003a). Explicitly teach-
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1995). Young chil- ing for transfer: Effects on third-grade students’ mathemat-
dren’s knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the ical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology,
Society for Research in Child Development, 60(1) (Serial 95, 293–305.
No. 243).
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L.,
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. B. Owen, R., & Schroeter, K. (2003b). Enhancing third-grade
Kail, Jr., & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the develop- students’ mathematical problem solving with self-regulated
ment of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95,
Erlbaum. 306–315.

Floden, R. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A con- Furth, H. G. (1970). Piaget for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
tinuing model for research on teaching. In V. Richardson Prentice Hall.
(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp.
3–16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Fuson, K. C. (1979). The development of self-regulating as-
Association. pects of speech: A review. In G. Zivin (Ed.), The develop-
ment of self-regulation through private speech (pp.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: 135–217). New York: Wiley.
Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E.
R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. Fuson, K. C., & Willis, G. B. (1989). Second graders’ use of
31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. schematic drawings in solving addition and subtraction
word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981a). A cognitive process theory 514–520.
of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32,
365–387. Gaa, J. P. (1973). Effects of individual goal-setting confer-
ences on achievement, attitudes, and goal-setting behav-
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981b). The pregnant pause: An in- ior. Journal of Experimental Education, 42, 22–28.
quiry into the nature of planning. Research in the
Teaching of English, 15, 229–243. Gaa, J. P. (1979). The effects of individual goal-setting confer-
ences on academic achievement and modification of locus
FPG Child Development Institute. (2005). Early developments. of control orientation. Psychology in the Schools, 16,
NCEDL pre-kindergarten study, 9(1). Chapel Hill, NC: 591–597.
Author. Available online at: http://www.fpg.unc.edu/
~ncdel. Gage, N. L. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Franks, J. J., & Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual
patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 65–74. Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The
cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New
Frauenglass, M. H., & Diaz, R. M. (1985). Self-regulatory func- York: HarperCollins.
tions of children’s private speech: A critical analysis of re-
cent challenges to Vygotsky’s theory. Developmental Gagné, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects:
Psychology, 21, 357–364. Useful categories of human performance. American
Psychologist, 39, 377–385.
Freud, S. (1966). The complete introductory lectures on psy-
choanalysis (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: Norton. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.).
New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Friedman, D. E., & Medway, F. J. (1987). Effects of varying
performance sets and outcome on the expectations, attri- Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instruc-
butions, and persistence of boys with learning disabilities. tional design (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 312–316. Winston.

Friend, R., & Neale, J. (1972). Children’s perceptions of suc- Gagné, R. M., & Dick, W. (1983). Instructional psychology.
cess and failure: An attributional analysis of the effects of Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 261–295.
race and social class. Developmental Psychology, 7,
124–128. Gagné, R. M., & Glaser, R. (1987). Foundations in learning re-
search. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.), Instructional technology:
Frieze, I. H. (1980). Beliefs about success and failure in the Foundations (pp. 49–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
classroom. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The social psychology of
school learning (pp. 39–78). New York: Academic Press. Galbreath, J. (1992). The educational buzzword of the 1990’s:
Multimedia, or is it hypermedia, or interactive multimedia,
Frieze, I. H., Francis, W. D., & Hanusa, B. H. (1983). Defining or ... ? Educational Technology, 32(4), 15–19.
success in classroom settings. In J. M. Levine & M. C. Wang
(Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for Garcia, J., & Garcia y Robertson, R. (1985). Evolution of learn-
learning (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. ing mechanisms. In B. L. Hammonds (Ed.), Psychology

References 513

and learning: Master lecture series (Vol. 4, pp. 191–243). Glaser, C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. students’ composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction
Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to conse- and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational
quence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, Psychology, 99, 297–310.
123–124.
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within
cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and instructional research. American Psychologist, 45, 29–39.
self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and perfor- Glaser, R., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning theory and the
mance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127–153). study of instruction. Annual Review of Psychology, 40,
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 631–666.
Gazzaniga, M., Bogen, J., & Sperry, R. (1962). Some func-
tional effects of sectioning the cerebral commissures in Glasgow, K. L., Dornbusch, S. M., Troyer, L., Steinberg, L., &
man. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Ritter, P. L. (1997). Parenting styles, adolescents’ attribu-
USA, 48, 1765–1769. tions, and educational outcomes in nine heterogeneous
Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Mangun, R. (1998) Cognitive neu- high schools. Child Development, 68, 507–529.
roscience. New York: Norton.
Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972). Urban stress: Experiments
children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical devel- on noise and social stressors. New York: Academic Press.
opment and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Glover, J. A., Plake, B. S., Roberts, B., Zimmer, J. W., &
Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying Palmere, M. (1981). Distinctiveness of encoding: The effects
achievement deficits in children with mathematical learn- of paraphrasing and drawing inferences on memory from
ing disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 736–744.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understand-
ing of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Bruning, R. H. (1990).
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Cognitive psychology for teachers. New York: Macmillan.
Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encod-
ing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–408. Goble, F. G. (1970). The third force: The psychology of
George, T. R., Feltz, D. L., & Chase, M. A. (1992). Effects of Abraham Maslow. New York: Grossman.
model similarity on self-efficacy and muscular endurance:
A second look. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000).
14, 237–248. Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and im-
Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, pact on student achievement. American Educational
P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students Research Journal, 37, 479–507.
with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional
components. Review of Educational Research, 79, Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004).
1202–1242. Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, em-
Geschwind, N. (1998). Language areas in the brain. In R. L. pirical evidence, and future directions. Educational
Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. Researcher, 33(3), 3–13.
425–426). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Gesell, A., & Ilg, F. (1946). The child from five to ten. New Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent
York: Harper Brothers. memory in two natural environments: On land and under-
Gesell, A., Ilg, F., & Ames, L. (1956). Youth: The years from water. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325–332.
ten to sixteen. New York: Harper Brothers.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A con- Godding, P. R., & Glasgow, R. E. (1985). Self-efficacy and out-
struct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, come expectations as predictors of controlled smoking sta-
569–582. tus. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 583–590.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solv-
ing. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355. Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993).
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read
analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279–297.
Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1988). Piaget’s theory of intellec-
tual development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Gollub, L. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Schedule ef-
Hall. fects. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook
Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. of operant behavior (pp. 288–312). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
(2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and Prentice Hall.
behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 98, 732–749. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Doan Holbein, M.
Gitomer, D. H., & Glaser, R. (1987). If you don’t know it work F. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental in-
on it: Knowledge, self-regulation and instruction. In R. E. volvement and student motivation. Educational
Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruc- Psychology Review, 17, 99–123.
tion (Vol. 3, pp. 301–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1984). Looking in classrooms
(3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in ele-
mentary and junior high school students. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 77, 631–645.

Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in
young elementary school children. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82, 525–538.

Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1998). Role
of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s
academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study. Child
Development, 69, 1448–1460.

Gould, D., & Weiss, M. (1981). The effects of model similarity
and model talk on self-efficacy and muscular endurance.
Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 17–29.

514 References

Grabe, M. (1986). Attentional processes in education. In G. D. solving and education: Issues in teaching and research
Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: (pp. 9–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp. Greeno, J. G. (1989). A perspective on thinking. American
49–82). Orlando: Academic Press. Psychologist, 44, 134–141.
Greeno, J. G., & the Middle School Mathematics Through
Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (1998). Learning with Internet tools: A Applications Project Group (1998). The situativity of know-
primer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
Griffin, M. M. (1995). You can’t get there from here: Situated
Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achieve- learning, transfer, and map skills. Contemporary
ment contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–39. Educational Psychology, 20, 65–87.
Groen, G., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis
Graham, S. (1994). Motivation in African Americans. Review of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329–343.
of Educational Research, 64, 55–117. Grolnick, W. S., Gurland, S. T., Jacob, K. F., & Decourcey, W.
(2002). The development of self-determination in middle
Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne childhood and adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles
(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.
457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 147–171). San Diego: Academic Press.
Grossen, B. (1991). The fundamental skills of higher order
Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on thinking. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 343–353.
cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth Gunnar, M. R. (1996). Quality of care and buffering of stress
of information processing. Journal of Educational physiology: Its potential for protecting the developing
Psychology, 83, 187–194. human brain. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Institute of Child Development.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation Gupta, P., & Cohen, N. J. (2002). Theoretical and computa-
and transcription skills in writing and writing develop- tional analysis of skill learning, repetition priming, and
ment. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12. procedural memory. Psychological Review, 109, 401–448.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning dis- study of construct dimensions. American Educational
abilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of Research Journal, 31, 627–643.
SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham Guthrie, E. R. (1930). Conditioning as a principle of learning.
(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). Psychological Review, 37, 412–428.
New York: Guilford Press. Guthrie, E. R. (1938). The psychology of human conflict. New
York: Harper & Brothers.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. S. Guthrie, E. R. (1940). Association and the law of effect.
(1998). Writing instruction. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Psychological Review, 47, 127–148.
Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. Guthrie, E. R. (1942). Conditioning: A theory of learning in
391–424). New York: Academic Press. terms of stimulus, response, and association. In N. B.
Henry (Ed.), The psychology of learning: The forty-first
Graham, S., & Hudley, C. (2005). Race and ethnicity in the yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education
study of motivation and competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. (Part II, pp. 17–60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation Guthrie, E. R. (1952). The psychology of learning (Rev. ed.).
(pp. 392–413). New York: Guilford Press. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Guthrie, E. R. (1959). Association by contiguity. In S. Koch
Graham, S., & Long, A. (1986). Race, class, and the attribu- (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2, pp.
tional process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 158–195). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4–13. Guthrie, E. R., & Horton, G. P. (1946). Cats in a puzzle box.
New York: Rinehart & Company.
Graham, S., & Taylor, A. Z. (2002). Ethnicity, gender, and the Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C.,
development of achievement values. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks. S.
Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engage-
121–146). San Diego: Academic Press. ment through concept-oriented reading instruction.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403–423.
Graham, S., & Williams, C. (2009). An attributional approach Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.) (2004).
to motivation in school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented
(Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 11–33). New reading instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
York: Routledge. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of
integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in
Gray, C. R., & Gummerman, K. (1975). The enigmatic eidetic reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331–341.
image: A critical examination of methods, data, and theo- Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to
ries. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 383–407. the career development of women. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 18, 326–339.
Gredler, M. E. (2009). Hiding in plain sight: The stages of Halgren, E., & Marinkovic, K. (1995). Neurophysiological net-
mastery/self-regulation in Vygotsky’s cultural-historical works integrating human emotions. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),
theory. Educational Psychologist, 44, 1–19.

Green, C. D. (2009). Darwinian theory, functionalism, and the
first American psychological revolution. American
Psychologist, 64, 75–83.

Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of
Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning:
New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational
Research, 77, 334–372.

Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of
SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a so-
phisticated mental model of a complex system.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 18–29.

Greeno, J. G. (1980). Trends in the theory of knowledge for
problem solving. In D. Tuma & F. Reif (Eds.), Problem

References 515

The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1137–1151). Cambridge, Harlow, S., Cummings, R., & Aberasturi, S. M. (2006). Karl
MA: MIT Press. Popper and Jean Piaget: A rationale for constructivism. The
Hall, G. S. (1894). The new psychology as a basis of educa- Educational Forum, 71, 41–48.
tion. The Forum, 17, 710–720.
Hall, G. S. (1896). The case of the public schools. Atlantic Harris, B. (1979). Whatever happened to Little Albert?
Monthly, 77, 402–413. American Psychologist, 34, 151–160.
Hall, G. S. (1900). Child study and its relation to education.
The Forum, 29, 688–702. Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in as-
Hall, G. S. (1903). Child study at Clark University. American sociative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584–605.
Journal of Psychology, 14, 96–106.
Hall, V., Howe, A., Merkel, S., & Lederman, N. (1986). Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children
Behavior, motivation, and achievement in desegregated turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.
junior high school science classes. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 78, 108–115. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process
Hall, V. C. (2003). Educational psychology from 1890 to 1920. work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation.
In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 3–39).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving
Hallahan, D. P., Kneedler, R. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (1983). the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling
Cognitive behavior modification techniques for learning young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy develop-
disabled children: Self-instruction and self-monitoring. In J. ment with and without peer support. American
D. McKinney & L. Feagans (Eds.), Current topics in learn- Educational Research Journal, 43, 295–340.
ing disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 207–244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Halliday, A. M. (1998). Evoked potential. In R. L. Gregory Harris, K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive
(Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 231–233). strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction.
Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–404.
Halpern, D. F. (2006). Assessing gender gaps in learning and
academic achievement. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward
(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. a developmental model. Human Development, 21, 34–64.
635–653). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the science Harter, S. (1981). A model of mastery motivation in children:
of learning to the university and beyond: Teaching for Individual differences and developmental change. In W. A.
long-term retention and transfer. Change, 35(4), 36–41. Collins (Ed.), Aspects on the development of competence:
Halpern, D. F., Hansen, C., & Riefer, D. (1990). Analogies as The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 14, pp.
an aid to understanding and memory. Journal of 215–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Educational Psychology, 82, 298–305.
Hamilton, R. J. (1985). A framework for the evaluation of the Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1984). A comparison of children’s
effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives. Review achievement and related self-perceptions of competence,
of Educational Research, 55, 47–85. control, and motivational orientation. In J. G. Nicholls
Hancock, C. R. (2001). The teaching of second languages: (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 3,
Research trends. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of re- pp. 219–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
search on teaching (4th ed., pp. 358–369). Washington, DC:
American Educational Research Association. Hartley, E. T., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (1998). Self-modeling
Hannafin, M. J., & Peck, K. L. (1988). The design, develop- as an intervention to increase student classroom participa-
ment, and evaluation of instructional software. New York: tion. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 363–372.
Macmillan.
Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
during learning of science textbook passages among low- Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning
and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 24, 95–123. skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.
& Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term conse- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback.
quences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and per- Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
formance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring
92, 316–330. new information as a process in comprehension. Journal
Harari, O., & Covington, M. V. (1981). Reactions to achieve- of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.
ment behavior from a teacher and student perspective: A Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cog-
developmental analysis. American Educational Research nition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell
Journal, 18, 15–28. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individ-
Hardiman, P. T., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. P. (1989). The rela- ual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ:
tion between problem categorization and problem solving Erlbaum.
among experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 17, Hayes, J. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cog-
627–638. nition and affect in writing. In R. Indrisano & J. R. Squire
(Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and prac-
tice (pp. 6–44). Newark, DE: International Reading
Association.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization
of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg
(Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes-Roth, B., & Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Integration of
knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavior, 18, 91–108.
Haynes, N. M., Emmons, C. L., Gebreyesus, S., & Ben-Avie,
M. (1996). The School Development Program evaluation

516 References

process. In J. P. Comer, N. M. Haynes, E. T. Joyner, & M. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and
Ben-Avie (Eds.), Rallying the whole village: The Comer how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review,
process for reforming education (pp. 123–146). New York: 16, 235–266.
Teachers College Press.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neu- Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching col-
ropsychological theory. New York: Wiley. lege students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk
Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. Berlin: & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From
Springer-Verlag. teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57–85). New York:
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension Guilford Press.
of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and
unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Hogan, D. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (1999). Implications of
Psychology, 87, 18–32. Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell &
Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven psychologies. New York: A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp.
Appleton-Century-Crofts. 39–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization.
Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112. Holland, J. G. (1992). Obituary: B. F. Skinner (1904–1990).
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. American Psychologist, 47, 665–667.
New York: Wiley.
Henderson, J. G. (1996). Reflective teaching: The study of Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behav-
your constructivist practices (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, ior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Henderson, R. W., & Cunningham, L. (1994). Creating interac- Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J.
tive sociocultural environments for self-regulated learning. C., & Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierarchical
In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation mapping technique as an aid to prose processing.
of learning and performance: Issues and educational ap- Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 227–237.
plications (pp. 255–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Hollis, K. L. (1997). Contemporary research on Pavlovian
Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in conditioning: A “new” functional analysis. American
the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 52, 956–965.
Psychologist, 37, 137–150.
Hidi, S. E. (1995). A reexamination of the role of attention in Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Mental models in problem solving. In J.
learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 7, R. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning
323–350. and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp.
Hidi, S. E., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: 193–218). San Francisco: Freeman.
Relationships between two variables that influence
learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind.
Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, re- American Psychologist, 52, 35–44.
search, and applications (pp. 77–109). New York: Taylor
& Francis. Hom, H. L., Jr., & Murphy, M. D. (1985). Low need achievers’
Higgins, E. T. (1981). Role taking and social judgment: performance: The positive impact of a self-determined
Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. In goal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11,
J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: 275–285.
Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 119–153). Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press. Homme, L., Csanyi, A. P., Gonzales, M. A., & Rechs, J. R.
Highet, G. (1950). The art of teaching. New York: Vintage. (1970). How to use contingency contracting in the class-
Hilgard, E. R. (1956). Theories of learning (2nd ed.). New room. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hilgard, E. R. (1996). Perspectives on educational psychol- Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). Psychological perspec-
ogy. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 419–431. tives on emerging instructional technologies: A critical
Hill, N. E., & Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent-school involvement analysis. Educational Psychologist, 26, 69–95.
and school performance: Mediated pathways among so-
cioeconomically comparable African American and Euro- Hopkins, S. L., & Lawson, M. J. (2002). Explaining the acqui-
American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, sition of a complex skill: Methodological and theoretical
74–83. considerations uncovered in the study of simple addition
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every and the moving-on process. Educational Psychology
American needs to know. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Review, 14, 121–154.
Hirt, E. R., Erickson, G. A., & McDonald, H. E. (1993). Role of
expectancy timing and outcome consistency in ex- Horner, S. L. (2004). Observational learning during shared
pectancy-guided retrieval. Journal of Personality and book reading: The effects on preschoolers’ attention to
Social Psychology, 65, 640–656. print and letter knowledge. Reading Psychology, 25, 1–22.
Hitchcock, C. H., Dowrick, P. W., & Prater, M. A. (2003).
Video self-modeling intervention in school-based settings, Horner, S. L., & Gaither, S. M. (2004). Attribution retraining in-
Remedial and Special Education, 24, 36–45, 56. struction with a second-grade class. Early Childhood
Education Journal, 31, 165–170.

Horowitz, F. D. (1992). John B. Watson’s legacy: Learning and
environment. Developmental Psychology, 28, 360–367.

Hosford, R. E. (1981). Self-as-a-model: A cognitive social learn-
ing technique. The Counseling Psychologist, 9 (1), 45–62.

Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to
behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Humphrey, G. (1921). Imitation and the conditioned reflex.
Pedagogical Seminary, 28, 1–21.

Hunt, E. (1989). Cognitive science: Definition, status, and
questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 603–629.

Hunt, J. McV. (1963). Motivation inherent in information pro-
cessing and action. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and
social interaction (pp. 35–94). New York: Ronald.

References 517

Hunt, M. (1993). The story of psychology. New York: motor skill acquisition. Journal of Sport and Exercise
Doubleday. Psychology, 8, 213–226.
Jussim, L., Robustelli, S. L., & Cain, T. R. (2009). Teacher ex-
Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Strobel, J. (2008). Constructivism pectations and self-fulfilling prophecies. In K. R. Wentzel &
and education: Misunderstandings and pedagogical impli- A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp.
cations. The Teacher Educator, 43, 72–86. 349–380). New York: Routledge.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of
Isaksen, S. G., & Gaulin, J. P. (2005). A reexamination of comprehension: Individual differences in working mem-
brainstorming research: Implications for research and ory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 315–329. Justice, E. M., Baker-Ward, L., Gupta, S., & Jannings, L. R.
(1997). Means to the goal of remembering: Developmental
Jacoby, L. L., Bartz, W. H., & Evans, J. D. (1978). A functional changes in awareness of strategy use-performance rela-
approach to levels of processing. Journal of Experimental tions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65,
Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 331–346. 293–314.
Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and
Jagacinski, C. M., & Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Conceptions of abil- dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal
ity and related affects in task involvement and ego involve- Psychology, 71, 17–24.
ment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 909–919. Kagan, J., Moss, H. A., & Sigel, I. E. (1960). Conceptual style
and the use of affect labels. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 6,
Jagacinski, C. M., & Nicholls, J. G. (1987). Competence and 261–278.
affect in task involvement and ego involvement: The im- Kagan, J., Pearson, L., & Welch, L. (1966). Modifiability of an
pact of social comparison information. Journal of impulsive tempo. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57,
Educational Psychology, 79, 107–114. 359–365.
Kail, R. (2002), Developmental change in proactive interfer-
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. I & II). ence. Child Development, 73, 1703–1714.
New York: Henry Holt. Kail, R. B., Jr., & Hagen, J. W. (1982). Memory in childhood.
In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental
James, W. (1892). Psychology: Briefer course. New York: psychology (pp. 350–366). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Henry Holt. Hall.
Kail, R. V., & Ferrer, E. (2007). Processing speed in childhood
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). and adolescence: Longitudinal models for examining de-
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and velopmental change. Child Development, 78, 1760–1770.
Curriculum Development. Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick, L. (1986). Self-management
methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping
Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Haria. P., Leh, J., Adams, A., & people change: A textbook of methods (3rd ed., pp.
Kaduvettoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and mul- 283–345). New York: Pergamon.
tiple strategy instruction on third-grade students’ mathe- Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive
matical problem solving. Journal of Educational abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction ap-
Psychology, 99, 115–127. proach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology,
74, 657–690.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with Kanfer, R., & Kanfer, F. H. (1991). Goals and self-regulation:
multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, Applications of theory to work settings. In M. L. Maehr & P.
101, 621–629. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achieve-
ment (Vol. 7, pp. 287–326). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Johnson, D. S. (1981). Naturally acquired learned helpless- Kardash, C. A. M., Royer, J. M., & Greene, B. A. (1988). Effects
ness: The relationship of school failure to achievement be- of schemata on both encoding and retrieval of information
havior, attributions, and self-concept. Journal of from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,
Educational Psychology, 73, 174–180. 324–329.
Karoly, P., & Harris, A. (1986). Operant methods. In F. H.
Johnson, W. B. (2006). On being a mentor: A guide for higher Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change: A
education faculty. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. textbook of methods (3rd ed., pp. 111–144). New York:
Pergamon.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The three-term series problem. Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elabo-
Cognition, 1, 57–82. rate Vygotsky’s concept of mediation: Implications for in-
struction. American Psychologist, 53, 27–36.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). Deductive reasoning ability. In R. Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing. New York:
J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-pro- Columbia University Press.
cessing approach (pp. 173–194). New York: Freeman. Katzir, T., & Paré-Blagoev, J. (2006). Applying cognitive neu-
roscience research to education: The case of literacy.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Deductive reasoning. Annual Educational Psychologist, 41, 53–74.
Review of Psychology, 50, 109–135. Keeney, T. J., Cannizzo, S. R., & Flavell, J. H. (1967).
Spontaneous and induced verbal rehearsal in a recall task.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Child Development, 38, 953–966.
Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review,
99, 418–439.

Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., & Tabossi, P. (1989).
Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantification.
Psychological Review, 96, 658–673.

Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mind
tools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2006). Learning to trou-
bleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture.
Educational Psychology Review, 18, 77–114.

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning
with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Jourden, F. J., Bandura, A., & Banfield, J. T. (1991). The im-
pact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory factors and

518 References

Keeney-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Koffka, K. (1926). Mental development. In C. Murchison
Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925 (pp. 129–143). Worcester, MA:
role of children’s approach to schoolwork. Developmental Clark University Press.
Psychology, 42, 11–26.
Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes (E. Winter, Trans.).
Keller, F. S., & Ribes-Inesta, E. (1974). Behavior modification: New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Applications to education. New York: Academic Press.
Köhler, W. (1926). An aspect of Gestalt psychology. In C.
Kempermann, G., & Gage, F. (1999, May). New nerve cells Murchinson (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925 (pp. 163–195).
for the adult brain. Scientific American, 280(6), 48–53. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

Kerst, S. M., & Howard, J. H., Jr. (1977). Mental comparisons Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new
for ordered information on abstract and concrete dimen- concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright.
sions. Memory & Cognition, 5, 227–234. (Reprinted 1959, New American Library, New York)

Kiewra, K. A., & Dubois, N. F. (1998). Learning to learn: Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A
Making the transition from student to life-long learner. view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist,
Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 52, 57–66.

King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntac- Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A devel-
tic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of opmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18,
Memory and Language, 30, 580–602. 199–214.

Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in mem- Kosiewicz, M. M., Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J., & Graves, A. W.
ory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (1982). Effects of self-instruction and self-correction proce-
dures on handwriting performance. Learning Disability
Kintsch, W. (1979). On modeling comprehension. Quarterly, 5, 71–78.
Educational Psychologist, 14, 3–14.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA:
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text Harvard University Press.
comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85,
363–394. Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Mental representation. In J. R.
Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning
Kirkland, K., & Hollandsworth, J. G. (1980). Effective test tak- and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp.
ing: Skills-acquisition versus anxiety-reduction techniques. 91–117). San Francisco: Freeman.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 431–439.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1988). Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of
Kirkorian, H. L., Wartella, E. A., & Anderson, D. R. (2008). mental imagery. Science, 240, 1621–1626.
Media and young children’s learning. The Future of
Children, 18(1), 39–61. Kosslyn, S. M., & Pomerantz, J. P. (1977). Imagery, proposi-
tions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive Psychology, 9, 52–76.
load approach to collaborative learning: United brains
for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (Eds.) (2004a). Education and
31–42. technology: An encyclopedia (Vol. 1). Santa Barbara, CA:
ABC-CLIO.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why mini-
mal guidance during instruction does not work: An analy- Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (Eds.) (2004b). Education and
sis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem- technology: An encyclopedia (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA:
based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. ABC-CLIO.
Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychol-
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulation of ogy: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. American
motoric learning: A strategic cycle view. Journal of Psychologist, 41, 264–274.
Applied Sport Psychology, 10, 220–239.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathe-
Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discov- matical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooper-
ery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. ative learning and metacognitive training. American
Psychological Bulletin, 125, 524–543. Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.

Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of Kubovy, M., & van den Berg, M. (2008). The whole is equal
the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology to the sum of its parts: A probabilistic model of grouping
Review, 14, 173–203. by proximity and similarity in regular patterns.
Psychological Review, 115, 131–154.
Klauda, S. L. (2009). The role of parents in adolescents’ read-
ing motivation and activity. Educational Psychology Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation
Review, 21, 325–363. and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory
of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experi-
Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (2008). Inductive reasoning: A mental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99–171). New
training approach. Review of Educational Research, 78, York: Academic Press.
85–123.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior
Klausmeier, H. J. (1990). Conceptualizing. In B. F. Jones & L. consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus
Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruc- state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action
tion (pp. 93–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). New
York: Springer-Verlag.
Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teach-
ing. Educational Psychologist, 27, 267–286. Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979a). Behavioral change in a
constant environment: Shift to more difficult tasks with
Koffka, K. (1922). Perception: An introduction to the constant probability of success. Journal of Personality and
Gestalttheorie. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531–585. Social Psychology, 37, 549–561.

Koffka, K. (1924). The growth of the mind (R. M. Ogden,
Trans.). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.

References 519

Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979b). The dynamic theory of Lefcourt, H. M. (1976). Locus of control: Current trends in
achievement motivation: From episodic to dynamic think- theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
ing. Psychological Review, 86, 141–151.
Lemonick, M. D. (2003, February 17). A twist of fate. Time,
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. 161, 48–58.
Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–25, 46.
Lemonick, M. D. (2007, January 29). The flavor of memories.
Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Time, 169, 102–104.
Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analy-
sis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 265–299. Lemonick, M. D., & Dorfman, A. (2006, October 9). What
makes us different? Time, 168, 44–50, 53.
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness
of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual
findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525–544. supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive
analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49.
Lajoie, S. P. (2003). Transitions and trajectories for studies of
expertise. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 21–25. Lepper, M. R. (1983). Extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation:
Implications for the classroom. In J. M. Levine & M. C.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question Wang (Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications
and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing for learning (pp. 281–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27,
29–63. Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational
and social issues. American Psychologist, 40, 1–18.
Lan, W. Y. (1998). Teaching self-monitoring skills in statistics.
In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic
learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom:
86–105). New York: Guilford Press. Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.
Lange, P. C. (1972). What’s the score on: Programmed in-
struction? Today’s Education, 61, 59. Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1978). Overjustification research
and beyond: Toward a means-ends analysis of intrinsic
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1986). Reading and writing and extrinsic motivation. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene
instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. In (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the
E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. psychology of human motivation (pp. 109–148). Hillsdale,
13, pp. 171–194). Washington, DC: American Educational NJ: Erlbaum.
Research Association.
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973).
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic re-
(1980). Models of competence in solving physics prob- wards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal
lems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–345. of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.

Larrauri, J. A., & Schmajuk, N. A. (2008). Attentional, associa- Lepper, M. R., & Gurtner, J. (1989). Children and computers:
tive, and configural mechanisms in extinction. Approaching the twenty-first century. American
Psychological Review, 115, 640–676. Psychologist, 44, 170–178.

Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the dis- Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J., & Gingras, I. (1999).
tance with online education. Review of Educational Understanding the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic
Research, 76, 567–605. motivation—uses and abuses of meta-analysis: Comment
on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological
Lattal, K. A. (1992). B. F. Skinner and psychology: Bulletin, 125, 669–676.
Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist,
47, 1269–1272. Lepper, M. R., & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the
classroom. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on mo-
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., tivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 73–105). San Diego:
Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school- Academic Press.
time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk stu-
dents. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313. Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation
and instructional effectiveness in computer-based educa-
Lazar, I., Darlington, R., Murray, H., Royce, J., & Snipper, A. tion. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning,
(1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from and instruction: Cognitive and affective process analysis
the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monograph of (Vol. 3, pp. 255–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
the Society for Research in Child Development (Serial
no. 195). Lepper, M. R., Sethi, S., Dialdin, D., & Drake, M. (1997).
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A developmental per-
Leask, J., Haber, R. N., & Haber, R. B. (1969). Eidetic imagery spective. In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. R.
in children: II. Longitudinal and experimental results. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives
Psychonomic Monograph Supplement, 3 (3, Whole No. 35). on adjustment, risk, and disorder (pp. 23–50). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Lee, F. J., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Does learning a complex
task have to be complex? A study in learning decomposi- Lesgold, A. M. (1984). Acquiring expertise. In J. R. Anderson
tion. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 267–316. & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory:
Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp. 31–60). San
Lee, J., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural Francisco: Freeman.
capital, and the achievement gap among elementary
school children. American Educational Research Journal, Lesgold, A.M. (2001). The nature and methods of learning by
43, 193–218. doing. American Psychologist, 56, 964–973.

Leeper, R. (1935). A study of a neglected portion of the field Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of ag-
of learning—The development of sensory organization. gressive behavior in experimentally created “social cli-
Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, mates.” Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.
46, 41–75.

520 References

Licht, B. G., & Kistner, J. A. (1986). Motivational problems of Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex
learning-disabled children: Individual differences and their differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
implications for treatment. In J. K. Torgesen & B. W. L.
Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992).
on learning disabilities (pp. 225–255). Orlando: Academic Working memory constraints on the processing of syntac-
Press. tic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56–98.

Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. (2006). Science education: Integrating Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001).
views of learning and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J.
H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learn-
(2nd ed., pp. 511–544). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. ing and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives
(2nd ed., pp. 39–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal
theory and affect: An asymmetrical bi-directional model. Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Shea, M. C. (1989). Operant the-
Educational Psychologist, 37, 69–78. ory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman &
D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and aca-
Lirgg, C. D., & Feltz, D. L. (1991). Teacher versus peer mod- demic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.
els revisited: Effects on motor performance and self-effi- 27–50). New York: Springer-Verlag.
cacy. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62,
217–224. Mace, F. C., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1988). Self-monitoring:
Applications and issues. In J. Witt, S. Elliott, & F. Gresham
Littleton, K., Light, P., Joiner, R., Messer, D., & Barnes, P. (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in education (pp.
(1998). Gender, task scenarios and children’s computer- 489–502). New York: Pergamon.
based problem solving. Educational Psychology, 18,
327–338. Mace, F. C., & West, B. J. (1986). Unresolved theoretical issues
in self-management: Implications for research and prac-
Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect tice. Professional School Psychology, 1, 149–163.
of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task perfor-
mance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251. Maddux, J. E. (1993). Social cognitive models of health and
exercise behavior: An introduction and review of con-
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting ceptual issues. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 5,
and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 116–140.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically Maddux, J. E., Brawley, L., & Boykin, A. (1995). Self-efficacy
useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year and healthy behavior: Prevention, promotion, and detec-
odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. tion. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and
adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). 173–202). New York: Plenum.
Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980.
Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152. Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory:
The past, present, and future. In K. R. Wentzel & A.
Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. (1976). Depth of Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp.
processing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), 77–104). New York: Routledge.
Recall and recognition (pp. 75–102). London: Wiley.
Maes, S., & Gebhardt, W. (2000). Self-regulation and health
Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and behavior: The health behavior goal model. In M. Boekaerts,
memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376–400. P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-
regulation (pp. 343–368). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lovaas, O. I. (1977). The autistic child: Language develop-
ment through behavior modification. New York: Irvington. Maes, S., & Karoly, P. (2005). Self-regulation assessment and
intervention in physical health and illness: A review.
Love, S. Q. (1983). Prediction of bulimic behaviors: A social Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 245–277.
learning analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Mager, R. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives. Palo
Alto, CA: Fearon.
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The
effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6, Mahoney, J. L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005). An ecological
Whole No. 248). analysis of after-school program participation and the de-
velopment of academic performance and motivational at-
Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980). A meta-analysis of tributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development,
the effects of advance organizers on learning and retention. 76, 811–825.
American Educational Research Journal, 17, 211–218.
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helpless-
Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of nor- ness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental
mal and abnormal behavior (J. Tizard, Trans.). New York: Psychology, 105, 3–46.
Liveright.
Manderlink, G., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1984). Proximal versus
Lutkehaus, N. C., & Greenfield, P. (2003). From The process of distal goal setting and intrinsic motivation. Journal of
education to The culture of education: An intellectual bi- Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 918–928.
ography of Jerome Bruner’s contributions to education. In
B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psy- Mandler, J. M. (1978). A code in the node: The use of a story
chology: A century of contributions (pp. 409–430). schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1, 14–35.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1976). Some of the thousand
Maag, J. W. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on words a picture is worth. Journal of Experimental
the disuse of positive reinforcement in schools. Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 529–540.
Exceptional Children, 67, 173–186.
Mandler, J. M., & Ritchey, G. H. (1977). Long-term memory
Mabbott, D. J., & Bisanz, J. (2003). Developmental change for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
and individual differences in children’s multiplication. Learning and Memory, 3, 386–396.
Child Development, 74, 1091–1107.

References 521

Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition
NJ: Erlbaum. (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learners as information processors:
Psychologist, 41, 954–969. Legacies and limitations of educational psychology’s sec-
ond metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31, 151–161.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A
social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the
Psychology, 38, 299–337. right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.

Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on Mayer, R. E. (1999). The promise of educational psychology:
academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of Learning in the content areas. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
the negative effects of academically selective schools. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). E. L. Thorndike’s enduring contributions
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multi- to educational psychology. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H.
faceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of con-
20, 107–123. tributions (pp. 113–154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Marshall, H. H., & Weinstein, R. S. (1984). Classroom factors Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule
affecting students’ self-evaluations: An interactional model. against pure discovery learning? The case for guided
Review of Educational Research, 54, 301–325. methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.

Martin, J. (1980). External versus self-reinforcement: A review Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a
of methodological and theoretical issues. Canadian click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper un-
Journal of Behavioural Science, 12, 111–125. derstanding of multimedia messages? Journal of
Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397.
Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive the-
ory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39, Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia
135–145.Martin, J learning in an interactive self-explaining environment:
What works in the design of agent-based microworlds?
Mashburn, A. J., Justice, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806–813.
(2009). Peer effects on children’s language achievement
during pre-kindergarten. Child Development, 80, 686–702. Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A
personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd learn better when words are in conversational style rather
ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96,
389–395.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.).
New York: Harper & Row. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cog-
nitive load in multimedia learning. Educational
Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy develop- Psychologist, 38, 43–52.
ment versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository
reading comprehension among struggling readers. Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999).
Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296. Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia com-
munications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of
Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of Educational Psychology, 91, 638–643.
competence in favorable and unfavorable environments:
Lessons from research on successful children. American Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues
Psychologist, 53, 205–220. in multimedia learning: Role of speaker’s voice. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 95, 419–425.
Masten, A. S., Hubbard, J. J., Gest, S. D., Tellegen, A.,
Garmezy, N., & Ramirez, M. (1999). Competence in the McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L.
context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladap- (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-
tation from childhood to late adolescence. Development Century-Crofts.
and Psychopathology, 11, 143–169.M
McCloskey, M., & Kaiser, M. (1984). The impetus impulse: A
Matlin, M. W. (2009). Cognition (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: medieval theory of motion lives on in the minds of chil-
Wiley. dren. The Sciences, 24(6), 40–45.

Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early McCullagh, P. (1993). Modeling: Learning, developmental,
gender differences in self-regulation and academic and social psychological considerations. In R. N. Singer, M.
achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, Murphey, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on
689–704. sport psychology (pp. 106–126). New York: Macmillan.

Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working
guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational
Psychology, 93, 377–389. Psychologist, 35, 13–23.

Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Cognitive aids for guid- McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and con-
ing graph comprehension. Journal of Educational nectedness in the development of discourse production.
Psychology, 99, 640–652. Text, 2, 113–139.

Mayer, R. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence mean- McDougall, W. (1926). An introduction to social psychology
ingful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, (Rev. ed.). Boston: John W. Luce.
371–383.
McGregor, G., & Vogelsberg, R. T. (1998). Inclusive schooling
Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational practices: Pedagogical and research foundations.
Psychologist, 19, 30–42. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Mayer, R. E. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R. J. Sternberg McKeachie, W. J. (1990). Learning, thinking, and Thorndike.
(Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing ap- Educational Psychologist, 25, 127–141.
proach (pp. 127–150). New York: Freeman.

522 References

McNeil, J. D. (1987). Reading comprehension: New directions Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of per-
for classroom practice (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, sonality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational
Foresman. Psychologist, 29, 121–136.

McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Learning mathematics Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in rec-
from procedural instruction: Externally imposed goals in- ognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence be-
fluence what is learned. Journal of Educational tween retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 92, 734–744. Psychology, 90, 227–234.

McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in
theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75, classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist,
531–566. 37, 107–114.

Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., & Solomon, K. O. (2000). Are there Mickelson, R. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox
kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology, 51, among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63,
121–147. 44–61.

Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ mo- Miliotis, D., Sesma, A., Jr., & Masten, A. S. (1999). Parenting as
tivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), a protective process for school success in children from
Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. homeless families. Early Education & Development, 10,
261–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 111–133.

Meece, J. L. (1994). The role of motivation in self-regulated Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model.
learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Educational Psychology, 7, 251–268.
Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and
educational applications (pp. 25–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or
Erlbaum. minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing in-
formation. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Meece, J. L. (2002). Child and adolescent development for ed-
ucators (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Miller, G. A. (1988). The challenge of universal literacy.
Science, 241, 1293–1299.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988).
Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribham, K. H. (1960). Plans and
classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
80, 514–523. Winston.

Meece, J. L., & Courtney, D. P. (1992). Gender differences in Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imita-
students’ perceptions: Consequences for achievement-re- tion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
lated choices. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.),
Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 209–228). Moerk, E. L. (1989). The LAD was a lady and the tasks were
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. ill-defined. Developmental Review, 9, 21–57.

Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of Molfese, D. L., Key, A. F., Kelly, S., Cunningham, N.,
elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy Terrell, S., Ferguson, M., Molfese, V. J., & Bonebright, T.
activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, (2006). Below-average, average, and above-average
454–480. readers engage different and similar brain regions
while reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39,
Meece, J. L., Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. B., & 352–363.
Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement:
Towards a model of academic choice. Psychological Moll, L. C. (2001). Through the mediation of others:
Bulletin, 91, 324–348. Vygotskian research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.),
Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 111–129).
Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: Washington, DC: American Educational Research
An integrative approach. New York: Plenum. Association.

Meichenbaum, D. (1986). Cognitive behavior modification. In Mondale, S., & Patton, S. B. (Eds.) (2001). School: The story of
F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people American public education. Boston: Beacon Press.
change: A textbook of methods (3rd ed., pp. 346–380). New
York: Pergamon. Montemayor, R., & Eisen, M. (1977). The development of self-
conceptions from childhood to adolescence.
Meichenbaum, D., & Asarnow, J. (1979). Cognitive-behavior Developmental Psychology, 13, 314–319.
modification and metacognitive development: Implications
for the classroom. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.), Monty, R. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1987). Choice, control, and
Cognitive behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and motivation in the young and aged. In M. L. Maehr & D. A.
procedures (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press. Kleiber (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement
(Vol. 5, pp. 99–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive
children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self- Moore, M. T. (1990). Problem finding and teacher experience.
control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 39–58.

Merrill, P. F. (1987). Job and task analysis. In R. M. Gagné Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoreti-
(Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. cal and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132,
141–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 297–326.

Messer, S. (1970). Reflection-impulsivity: Stability and school Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-
failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 487–490. based learning environments: A literature review of com-
puter self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79,
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems 576–600.
and promise in educational practice. Educational
Psychologist, 19, 59–74. Moray, N., Bates, A., & Barnett, T. (1965). Experiments on the
four-eared man. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 38, 196–201.

References 523

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). Engaging students in active Muth, K. D., Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., & Graves, M. F.
learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. (1988). Thinking out loud while studying text: Rehearsing
Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724–733. key ideas. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 315–318.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1988). Manual: A Guide to
promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type
of Educational Psychology, 96, 165–173. Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal Myers, M., II, & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive
learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational
19, 309–326. Psychology, 70, 680–690.

Morgan, P. L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional re- Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The
lationship between children’s reading skills and reading case against the standard model. Annual Review of
motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165–183. Psychology, 53, 53–81.

Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain,
processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. Journal mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. Academy Press.

Morris, E. K. (2003). B. F. Skinner: A behavior analyst in edu- Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs,
cational psychology. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk NJ: Prentice Hall.
(Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions
(pp. 229–250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Nelson, R. O., & Hayes, S. C. (1981). Theoretical explanations
for reactivity in self-monitoring. Behavior Modification, 5,
Morse, W. H., & Kelleher, R. T. (1977). Determinants of rein- 3–14.
forcement and punishment. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R.
Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. Nelson, T. O. (1977). Repetition and depth of processing.
174–200). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16,
151–171.
Mosatche, H. S., & Bragonier, P. (1981). An observational
study of social comparison in preschoolers. Child Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept
Development, 52, 376–378. and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of
Educational Research, 76, 413–448.
Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1976). Depth of processing,
retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in re- Neumeister, K. L. S., & Finch, H. (2006). Perfectionism in
call. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, high-ability students: Relational precursors and influences
447–458. on achievement motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50,
238–251.
Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialecti-
cal constructivism. Developmental Review, 2, 371–384. Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N., Eccles, J., Gomez, L., Klahr,
K., Linn, M., Miller, K., & Mix, K. (2009). Psychology’s role
Motl, R. W., Dishman, R. K., Saunders, R. P., Dowda, M., & in mathematics and science education. American
Pate, R. R. (2007). Perceptions of physical and social envi- Psychologist, 64, 538–550.
ronment variables and self-efficacy as correlates of self-re-
ported physical activity among adolescent girls. Journal of Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving.
Pediatric Psychology, 32, 6–12. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mueller, C. G. (1979). Some origins of psychology as science. Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of
Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 9–29. self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and perfor-
Mullen, C. A. (2005). Mentorship primer. New York: Peter Lang. mance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283–301).
Mullen, C. A. (in press). Facilitating self-regulatory learning Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

using mentoring approaches with doctoral students. In B. Newman, R. S. (2000). Social influences on the develop-
J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self- ment of children’s adaptive help seeking: The role of
regulation of learning and performance. New York: parents, teachers, and peers. Developmental Review, 20,
Routledge. 350–404.
Muller, U., Sokol, B., & Overton, W. F. (1998). Reframing a
constructivist model of the development of mental repre- Newman, R. S. (2002). What do I need to do to succeed ...
sentation: The role of higher-order operations. when I don’t understand what I’m doing!?: Developmental
Developmental Review, 18, 155–201. influences on students’ adaptive help seeking. In A.
Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement
self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic motivation (pp. 285–306). San Diego: Academic Press.
investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.
Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational per- Newman, R. S. (2008). The motivational role of adaptive help
spectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model seeking in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41, Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learn-
129–145. ing: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 315–337).
Murray, D. J., Kilgour, A. R., & Wasylkiw, L. (2000). Conflicts New York: Taylor & Francis.
and missed signals in psychoanalysis, behaviorism, and
Gestalt psychology. American Psychologist, 55, 422–426. Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1992). Student percep-
Murray, H. A. (1936). Techniques for a systematic investiga- tions and academic help-seeking. In D. H. Schunk & J. L.
tion of fantasy. Journal of Psychology, 3, 115–143. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: 123–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Oxford University Press.
Nicholls, J. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of ef-
fort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and
the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability.
Child Development, 49, 800–814.

524 References

Nicholls, J. G. (1979). Development of perception of own at- O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learn-
tainment and causal attribution for success and failure in ing. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of
reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94–99. educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 781–802). Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Nicholls, J. G. (1983). Conceptions of ability and achievement
motivation: A theory and its implications for education. In O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002).
S. G. Paris, G. M. Olson, & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing.
Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 211–237). Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71–86.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ohlsson, S. (1993). The interaction between knowledge and
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions practice in the acquisition of cognitive skills. In S.
of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and perfor- Chipman & A. L. Meyrowitz (Eds.), Foundations of knowl-
mance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. edge acquisition: Cognitive models of complex learning
(pp. 147–208). Boston: Kluwer.
Nicholls, J. G., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Patashnick,
M. (1990). Assessing students’ theories of success in math- Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors.
ematics: Individual and classroom differences. Journal for Psychological Review, 103, 241–262.
Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 109–122.
O’Leary, K. D., & Drabman, R. (1971). Token reinforcement
Nicholls, J. G., & Miller, A. T. (1984). Reasoning about the programs in the classroom: A review. Psychological
ability of self and others: A developmental study. Child Bulletin, 75, 379–398.
Development, 55, 1990–1999.
O’Leary, S. G., & Dubey, D. R. (1979). Applications of self-
Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). control procedures by children: A review. Journal of
Adolescents’ theories of education. Journal of Educational Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 449–466.
Psychology, 77, 683–692.
Ollendick, T. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Child behavioral as-
Nicholls, J. G., & Thorkildsen, T. A. (1989). Intellectual con- sessment: Principles and procedures. New York:
ventions versus matters of substance: Elementary school Pergamon.
students as curriculum theorists. American Educational
Research Journal, 26, 533–544. O’Mara, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L.
(2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A
Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis.
Social learning through the second year. Developmental Educational Psychologist, 41, 181–206.
Psychology, 42, 555–565.
Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. The
Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching Atlantic Monthly, 285, 45–48, 50–56, 61–62.
high school students to use heuristics while reading histor-
ical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 492–504. Ornstein, R. (1997). The right mind. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination. New York:
Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orien-
tations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, Scribner’s.
269–287. Otis, N., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). Latent mo-

Nolen, S. B. (1996). Why study? How reasons for learning in- tivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitu-
fluence strategy selection. Educational Psychology Review, dinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97,
8, 335–355. 170–183.
Overskeid, G. (2007). Looking for Skinner and finding Freud.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Girgus, J. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. American Psychologist, 62, 590–595.
(1986). Learned helplessness in children: A longitudinal Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and con-
study of depression, achievement, and explanatory style. structivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just episte-
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 435–442. mology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227–241.
Padilla, A. M. (2006). Second language learning: Issues in re-
Norman, D. A. (1976). Memory and attention: An introduc- search and teaching. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne
tion to human information processing (2nd ed.). New (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp.
York: Wiley. 571–591). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paivio, A. (1970). On the functional significance of imagery.
Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Explorations in Psychological Bulletin, 73, 385–392.
cognition. San Francisco: Freeman. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York:
Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal Paivio, A. (1978). Mental comparisons involving abstract at-
instructions and text on the generation of counterargu- tributes. Memory & Cognition, 6, 199–208.
ments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding ap-
97, 157–169. proach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement set-
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, N. (1982). Alternative frame- tings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
works, conceptual conflict, and accommodation: Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research.
Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motiva-
Science, 11, 183–200. tion and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT:
JAI Press.
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Forgetting in imme- Pajares, F. (2003). William James: Our father who begat us. In
diate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or inter- B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psy-
ference? Psychological Review, 115, 544–576. chology: A century of contributions (pp. 41–64). Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Day, E. F., Kulhavy, R. W., Anderson, W., & Malczynski, R.
J. (1971). Programmed instruction: Techniques and trends.
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Oden, S., Schweinhart, L., & Weikart, D. (2000). Into adult-
hood: A study of the effects of Head Start. Ypsilanti, MI:
High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.

References 525

Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in Pavlov, I. P. (1934). An attempt at a physiological interpreta-
self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. tion of obsessional neurosis and paranoia. Journal of
Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learn- Mental Science, 80, 187–197.
ing: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111–139).
New York: Taylor & Francis. Pearl, R. A., Bryan, T., & Donahue, M. (1980). Learning dis-
abled children’s attributions for success and failure.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self-efficacy and Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 3–9.
self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving: A path
analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203. Péladeau, N., Forget, J., & Gagné, F. (2003). Effect of paced
and unpaced practice on skill application and retention:
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy How much is enough? American Educational Research
and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of Journal, 40, 769–801.
assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42,
190–198. Pellegrino, J. W. (1985). Inductive reasoning ability. In R. J.
Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-process-
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school ing approach (pp. 195–225). New York: Freeman.
success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achieve-
ment. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), Self-perception Pellegrino, J. W., Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R. (1999).
(pp. 239–265). Westport, CT: Ablex. Addressing the “two disciplines” problem: Linking theo-
ries of cognition and learning with assessment and in-
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psy- structional practice. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson
chology and education: A historical perspective. In J. (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24,
Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact pp. 307–353). Washington, DC: American Educational
of psychological factors on education (pp. 3–21). San Research Association.
Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding and compre-
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of hension in skilled reading and implications for reading in-
comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring struction. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory
activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. and practice of early reading (pp. 57–84). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Palmer, D. J., Drummond, F., Tollison, P., & Zinkgraff, S.
(1982). An attributional investigation of performance out- Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills
comes for learning-disabled and normal-achieving pupils. context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25.
Journal of Special Education, 16, 207–219.
Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory
Papini, M. R., & Bitterman, M. E. (1990). The role of contin- of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of
gency in classical conditioning. Psychological Review, Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1699–1712.
97, 396–403.
Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning
Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructivist ap- and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational
proach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In Psychology, 90, 715–729.
B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated
learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American
and practice, (pp. 169–200). New York: Springer-Verlag. Psychologist, 55, 44–55.

Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Constructing Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention
theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental
In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Psychology, 58, 193–198.
learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspec-
tives (2nd ed., pp. 253–287). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Petri, H. L. (1986). Motivation: Theory and research (2nd ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming
a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Phares, E. J. (1976). Locus of control in personality.
8, 293–316. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1986). Children’s reading strategies, Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from
metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, studies of the human amygdale. Annual Review of
25–56. Psychology, 57, 27–53.

Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The
research on self-regulated learning. Educational many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher,
Psychologist, 36, 89–101. 24(7), 5–12.

Paris, S. G., Wixson, K. K., & Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Phillips, J. L., Jr. (1969). The origins of intellect: Piaget’s the-
Instructional approaches to reading comprehension. In E. ory. San Francisco: Freeman.
Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol.
13, pp. 91–128). Washington, DC: American Educational Phye, G. D. (1989). Schemata training and transfer of an in-
Research Association. tellectual skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,
347–352.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep,
Trans.). London: Oxford University Press. Phye, G. D. (1990). Inductive problem solving: Schema in-
ducement and memory-based transfer. Journal of
Pavlov, I. P. (1928). Lectures on conditioned reflexes (W. H. Educational Psychology, 82, 826–831.
Gantt, Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
Phye, G. D. (1992). Strategic transfer: A tool for academic
Pavlov, I. P. (1932a). Neuroses in man and animals. Journal problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 4,
of the American Medical Association, 99, 1012–1013. 393–421.

Pavlov, I. P. (1932b). The reply of a physiologist to psycholo- Phye, G. D. (1997). Inductive reasoning and problem solving:
gists. Psychological Review, 39, 91–127. The early grades. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of aca-
demic learning: The construction of knowledge (pp.
451–471). San Diego: Academic Press.

526 References

Phye, G. D. (2001). Problem-solving instruction and problem- perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ:
solving transfer: The correspondence issue. Journal of Erlbaum.
Educational Psychology, 93, 571–578. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of aca-
demic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motiva-
Phye, G. D., & Sanders, C. E. (1992). Accessing strategic tional factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.),
knowledge: Individual differences in procedural and strat- Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284).
egy transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, San Diego: Academic Press.
211–223. Plomin, R. (1990). Nature and nurture. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Phye, G. D., & Sanders, C. E. (1994). Advice and feedback: Poag-DuCharme, K. A., & Brawley, L. R. (1993). Self-efficacy
Elements of practice for problem solving. Contemporary theory: Use in the prediction of exercise behavior in the
Educational Psychology, 19, 286–301. community setting. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 5,
178–194.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement
York: International Universities Press. early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and
use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation. New York: Psychology, 82, 41–50.
Norton. Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reason-
ing. Psychological Review, 102, 533–566.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, University Press. (Reprinted 1957, Doubleday, Garden
pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley. City, NY)
Popham, W. J. (2008). Classroom assessment: What teachers
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. need to know (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
New York: Basic Books. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social ad-
ministration of the individual: Constructivist pedagogy as
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, systems of ideas in historical spaces. American
F. J. (2008). Classroom effects on children’s achievement Educational Research Journal, 35, 535–570.
trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of ab-
Research Journal, 45, 365–397. stract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77,
353–363.
Pianta, R.C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, meas- Postman, L. (1961). The present status of interference theory.
urement, and improvement of classroom processes: In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), Verbal learning and verbal behavior
Standardized observation can leverage capacity. (pp. 152–179). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. Postman, L., & Stark, K. (1969). Role of response availability
in transfer and interference. Journal of Experimental
Pietsch, J., Walker, R., & Chapman, E. (2003). The relationship Psychology, 79, 168–177.
among self-concept, self-efficacy, and performance in Premack, D. (1962). Reversibility of the reinforcement rela-
mathematics during secondary school. Journal of tion. Science, 136, 255–257.
Educational Psychology, 95, 589–603. Premack, D. (1971). Catching up with common sense or two
sides of a generalization: Reinforcement and punishment.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The In R. Glaser (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement (pp.
role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. 121–150). New York: Academic Press.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy in-
struction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-reg- P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of edu-
ulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. cational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ:
Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Erlbaum.
San Diego: Academic Press. Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Marks, M. B. (1992). But good
strategy instructors are constructivists! Educational
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on Psychology Review, 4, 3–31.
the role of student motivation in learning and teaching Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The
contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational
Research, 52, 61–91.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educa-
motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. tional psychology for educators, researchers, and policy-
Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. makers. New York: HarperCollins.
Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., Lysynchuk, L. M., Martin, V., Wood,
Pintrich, P. R., Cross, D. R., Kozma, R. B., & McKeachie, W. J. E., & Willoughby, T. (1990). A primer of research on cogni-
(1986). Instructional psychology. Annual Review of tive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to
Psychology, 37, 611–651. address them. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 1–58.
Pugh, K. J., & Bergin, D. A. (2006). Motivational influences on
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self- transfer. Educational Psychologist, 41, 147–160.
regulated learning components of classroom academic
performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82,
33–40.

Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation
and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L.
Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and
achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond
cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs
and classroom contextual factors in the process of concep-
tual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational
beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom aca-
demic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student

References 527

Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding Reid, R., Trout, A. L., & Schartz, M. (2005). Self-regulation in-
students in a complex learning environment: What have terventions for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity
we gained and what have we missed? Educational disorder. Exceptional Children, 71, 361–377.
Psychologist, 40, 1–12.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1999). Instructional design theories
Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student concep- and models. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
tions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning
strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Relich, J. D., Debus, R. L., & Walker, R. (1986). The mediating
Educational Psychology, 88, 87–100. role of attribution and self-efficacy variables for treatment
effects on achievement outcomes. Contemporary
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and re- Educational Psychology, 11, 195–216.
vival of American community. New York: Simon &
Schuster. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition
from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational
brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, Psychologist, 38, 15–22.
80, 1–24.
Renkl, A., Hilbert, T., & Schworm, S. (2009). Example-based
Quellmalz, E. S. (1987). Developing reasoning skills. In J. B. learning in heuristic domains: A cognitive load theory ac-
Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: count. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 67–78.
Theory and practice (pp. 86–105). New York: Freeman.
Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Informational variables in condition-
Rachlin, H. (1991). Introduction to modern behaviorism (3rd ing. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and
ed.). New York: Freeman. motivation (Vol. 6, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.

Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1991). Children’s guided Rescorla, R. A. (1976). Pavlovian excitatory and inhibitory
participation in planning imaginary errands with skilled conditioning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning
adult or peer partners. Developmental Psychology, 27, and cognitive processes (Vol. 2, pp. 7–35). Hillsdale, NJ:
381–389. Erlbaum.

Ramsel, D., & Grabe, M. (1983). Attentional allocation and Rescorla, R. A. (1987). A Pavlovian analysis of goal-directed
performance in goal-directed reading: Age differences in behavior. American Psychologist, 42, 119–129.
reading flexibility. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15,
55–65. Resnick, L. B. (1981). Instructional psychology. Annual
Review of Psychology, 32, 659–704.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2004). Family
correlates of trajectories of academic motivation during a Resnick, L. B. (1985). Cognition and instruction: Recent theo-
school transition: A semiparametric group-based ap- ries of human competence. In B. L. Hammonds (Ed.),
proach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 743–754. Psychology and learning: The master lecture series (Vol. 4,
pp. 127–186). Washington, DC: American Psychological
Ratner, H. H., Foley, M. A., & Gimpert, N. (2002). The role of Association.
collaborative planning in children’s source-monitoring er-
rors and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Resnick, L. B. (1989). Developing mathematical knowledge.
Psychology, 81, 44–73. American Psychologist, 44, 162–169.

Ray, J. J. (1982). Achievement motivation and preferred prob- Reynolds, R., & Anderson, R. (1982). Influence of questions
ability of success. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, on the allocation of attention during reading. Journal of
255–261. Educational Psychology, 74, 623–632.

Reardon, S. F., & Galindo, C. (2009). The Hispanic-White Riccio, D. C., Rabinowitz, V. C., & Axelrod, S. (1994).
achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary Memory: When less is more. American Psychologist, 49,
grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 917–926.
853–891.
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006).
Reder, L. M. (1979). The role of elaborations in memory for Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights
prose. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 221–234. from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental
Child Psychology, 94, 249–273.
Reder, L. M. (1982). Plausibility judgment versus fact retrieval:
Alternative strategies for sentence verification. Richter, C. P. (1927). Animal behavior and internal drives.
Psychological Review, 89, 250–280. Quarterly Review of Biology, 2, 307–343.

Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., Johnson, A., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. Rilling, M. (1977). Stimulus control and inhibitory processes.
(2007). Reconciling reinforcement learning models with In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of op-
behavioral extinction and renewal: Implications for addic- erant behavior (pp. 432–480). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
tion, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Prentice Hall.
Review, 114, 784–805.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic dis-
Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia tance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of
learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87–98. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1–20.

Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-
theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio- explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77,
cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. 1–15.
McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp.
31–60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and
procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to
Reid, R., & Lienemann, T. O. (2006). Self-regulated strategy the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175–189.
development for written expression with students with at-
tention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. (2007). Does comparing solution
Children, 73, 53–68. methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge?
An experimental study on learning to solve equations.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 561–574.

528 References

Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G. (2008). Trends in media use. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4,
The Future of Children, 18(1), 11–37. 328–350.

Robertson, J. S. (2000). Is attribution training a worthwhile Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic cate-
classroom intervention for K-12 students with learning dif- gories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104,
ficulties? Educational Psychology Review, 12, 111–134. 192–233.

Robinson, D. R., Schofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch &
(2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 9–31).
their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17, 327–362.
Rose, S. P. R. (1998). Memory: Biological basis. In R. L.
Robinson, F. P. (1946). Effective study. New York: Harper. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp.
Robinson, N. M., Lanzi, R. G., Weinberg, R. A., Ramey, S. L., & 456–460). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Ramey, C. T. (2002). Family factors associated with high Rosen, B., & D’Andrade, R. C. (1959). The psychosocial ori-
academic competence in former Head Start children at gins of achievement motivation. Sociometry, 22, 185–218.
third grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 278–290.
Robinson, T. R., Smith, S. W., Miller, M. D., & Brownell, M. T. Rosenberg, M., & Kaplan, H. B. (1982). Social psychology of
(1999). Cognitive behavior modification of hyperactivity- the self-concept. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson.
impulsivity and aggression: A meta-analysis of school-
based studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, Rosenholtz, S. J., & Rosenholtz, S. H. (1981). Classroom orga-
195–203. nization and the perception of ability. Sociology of
Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology Education, 54, 132–140.
into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Merrill/Prentice Hall. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Simpson, C. (1984). The formation of abil-
Roeser, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor ity conceptions: Developmental trend or social construc-
learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in tion? Review of Educational Research, 54, 31–63.
peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of
Educational Research, 77, 534–574. Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In
Roeser, R. W., Urdan, T. C., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). School M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching
as a context of student motivation and achievement. In K. (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation
at school (pp. 381–410). New York: Routledge. Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). The health belief model and pre-
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and in- ventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2,
terpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-cen- 354–386.
tered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of
a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill. Rosenthal, R. (1974). On the social psychology of the self-ful-
Rogers, C. R. (1963). The actualizing tendency in relation to filling prophecy: Further evidence for Pygmalion effects
“motives” and to consciousness. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), and their mediating mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular
Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 1–24). Publications.
Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Rosenthal, R. (2002). Covert communication in classrooms,
Merrill. clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles. American Psychologist,
Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd 57, 839–849.
ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Rogoff, B. (1986). Adult assistance of children’s learning. In T. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the class-
E. Raphael (Ed.), The contexts of school-based literacy (pp. room. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27–40). New York: Random House.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive de- Rosenthal, T. L., & Bandura, A. (1978). Psychological model-
velopment in the social context. New York: Oxford ing: Theory and practice. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin
University Press. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change:
Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & An empirical analysis (2nd ed., pp. 621–658). New York:
Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions Wiley.
with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257. Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social learning
Rohrkemper, M. M. (1989). Self-regulated learning and aca- and cognition. New York: Academic Press.
demic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J.
Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learn- Ross, S. M., McCormick, D., Krisak, N., & Anand, P. (1985).
ing and academic achievement: Theory, research, and Personalizing context in teaching mathematical concepts:
practice (pp. 143–167). New York: Springer-Verlag. Teacher-managed and computer-assisted models.
Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teach- Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33,
ing and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific 169–178.
inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on
teaching (3rd ed., pp. 850–873). New York: Macmillan. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal ver-
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1988). Setting the stage for discovery. sus external control of reinforcement. Psychological
The Sciences, 28(3), 26–34. Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609).

Royer, J. M. (1986). Designing instruction to produce under-
standing: An approach based on cognitive theory. In G. D.
Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning:
Understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp.
83–113). Orlando: Academic Press.

Royer, J. M., Tronsky, L. N., Chan, Y., Jackson, S. J., & Marchant,
H., III. (1999). Math-fact retrieval as the cognitive mechanism
underlying gender differences in math test performance.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 181–266.

Ruble, D. N. (1983). The development of social-comparison
processes and their role in achievement-related self-social-
ization. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, & W. Hartup (Eds.),

References 529

Social cognition and social development (pp. 134–157). Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer:
New York: Cambridge University Press. Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon.
Ruble, D. N., Boggiano, A. K., Feldman, N. S., & Loebl, J. H. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.
(1980). Developmental analysis of the role of social com-
parison in self-evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 16, Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (2000). Grounding develop-
105–115. ment in cognitive processes. Child Development, 71,
Ruble, D. N., Feldman, N. S., & Boggiano, A. K. (1976). Social 98–106.
comparison between young children in achievement situa-
tions. Developmental Psychology, 12, 191–197. Sandoval, J. (1995). Teaching in subject matter areas: Science.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 355–374.
G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and un-
derstanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211–236). Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1982). Assimilative processes
New York: Academic Press. in composition planning. Educational Psychologist, 17,
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing 165–171.
brief stories. In D. Laberge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic
processes in reading (pp. 265–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distrib- evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in chil-
uted processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cog- dren’s composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of
nition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. written language: A developmental approach (pp. 67–95).
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, London: Wiley.
and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton
& R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Research on written
37–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of re-
Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free re- search on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York:
call. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63–77. Macmillan.
Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Rehearsal processes in
free recall: A procedure for direct observation. Journal of Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hyperme-
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 99–105. dia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19,
Rustemeyer, R., & Fischer, N. (2005). Sex- and age-related dif- 285–307.
ferences in mathematics. Psychological Reports, 97,
183–194. Schiefele, U. (1996). Topic interest, text representation, and
Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do quality of experience. Contemporary Educational
some students avoid asking for help? An examination of Psychology, 21, 3–18.
the interplay among students’ academic efficacy, teachers’
social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528–535. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational at school (pp. 197–222). New York: Routledge.
analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in educa-
tion. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation Schmidt, M. E., & Vandewater, E. A. (2008). Media and atten-
in education (Vol. 2, pp. 13–51). Orlando: Academic Press. tion, cognition, and school achievement. The Future of
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory Children, 18(1), 63–85.
and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social develop-
ment, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being.
In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of moti- Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of
vation at school (pp. 171–195). New York: Routledge. cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19,
Sagotsky, G., Patterson, C. J., & Lepper, M. R. (1978). Training 469–508.
children’s self-control: A field experiment in self-monitor-
ing and goal-setting in the classroom. Journal of Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Mathematics teaching and learning.
Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 242–253. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of ed-
Sakitt, B. (1976). Iconic memory. Psychological Review, 83, ucational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 479–510). Mahwah, NJ:
257–276. Erlbaum.
Sakitt, B., & Long, G. M. (1979). Spare the rod and spoil the
icon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories.
Perception and Performance, 5, 19–30. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.
Salatas, H., & Flavell, J. H. (1976). Retrieval of recently
learned information: Development of strategies and con- Schuh, K. L. (2003). Knowledge construction in the learner-
trol skills. Child Development, 47, 941–948. centered classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology,
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: 95, 426–442.
The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a
function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Schultz, W. (2006). Behavioral theories and the neurophysiol-
Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658. ogy of reward. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 87–115.

Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on
children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.

Schunk, D. H. (1982a). Effects of effort attributional feedback
on children’s perceived self-efficacy and achievement.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 548–556.

Schunk, D. H. (1982b). Verbal self-regulation as a facilitator of
children’s achievement and self-efficacy. Human
Learning, 1, 265–277.

Schunk, D. H. (1983a). Ability versus effort attributional feed-
back: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 848–856.

Schunk, D. H. (1983b). Developing children’s self-efficacy and
skills: The roles of social comparative information and goal
setting. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 76–86.

530 References

Schunk, D. H. (1983c). Goal difficulty and attainment infor- self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational
mation: Effects on children’s achievement behaviors. Psychology, 91, 251–260.
Human Learning, 2, 107–117. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and aca-
demic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In
Schunk, D. H. (1983d). Progress self-monitoring: Effects on M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),
children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego:
Experimental Education, 51, 89–93. Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Gunn, T. P. (1986). Self-efficacy and skill de-
Schunk, D. H. (1983e). Reward contingencies and the devel- velopment: Influence of task strategies and attributions.
opment of children’s skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Journal of Educational Research, 79, 238–244.
Educational Psychology, 75, 511–518. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models:
Influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement.
Schunk, D. H. (1984a). Enhancing self-efficacy and achieve- Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 313–322.
ment through rewards and goals: Motivational and infor- Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989a). Influence of peer-
mational effects. Journal of Educational Research, 78, model attributes on children’s beliefs and learning.
29–34. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 431–434.
Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989b). Self-modeling and
Schunk, D. H. (1984b). Sequential attributional feedback and children’s cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational
children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 155–163.
Psychology, 76, 1159–1169. Schunk, D. H., Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer-
model attributes and children’s achievement behaviors.
Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 54–61.
self-efficacy and skills of learning disabled children. Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and ado-
Journal of Special Education, 19, 307–317. lescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.),
Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29–52).
Schunk, D. H. (1986). Verbalization and children’s self-regu- Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
lated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of aca-
347–369. demic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.),
Development of academic motivation (pp. 15–31). San
Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral Diego: Academic Press.
change. Review of Educational Research, 57, 149–174. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions
and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp.
self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 85–104). New York: Guilford Press.
71–86. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K.
R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. at school (pp. 35–53). New York: Routledge.
Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008).
Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applica-
Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attri- tions (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
butions in academic settings. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1986). Extended attributional
Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and perfor- feedback: Sequence effects during remedial reading in-
mance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 75–99). struction. Journal of Early Adolescence, 6, 55–66.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehen-
sion skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information.
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruc- Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 285–302.
tion. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1989). Learning goals and chil-
adjustment: Theory, research, and applications (pp. dren’s reading comprehension. Journal of Reading
281–303). New York: Plenum. Behavior, 21, 279–293.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1991). Learning goals and
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences progress feedback during reading comprehension instruc-
during children’s cognitive skill learning. American tion. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 351–364.
Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1993). Strategy fading and
progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and compre-
Schunk, D. H. (1998). Teaching elementary students to self- hension among students receiving remedial reading
regulate practice of mathematical skills with modeling. In services. Journal of Special Education, 27, 257–276.
D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993a). Goals and progress
learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement.
137–159). New York: Guilford Press. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337–354.
Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993b). Writing strategy in-
Schunk, D. H. (1999). Social-self interaction and achievement struction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feed-
behavior. Educational Psychologist, 34, 219–227. back on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15,
225–230.
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regu-
lated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),
Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:
Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 125–151). Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.

Schunk, D. H. (2008). Attributions as motivators of self-regu-
lated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.),
Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research,
and applications (pp. 245–266). New York: Taylor &
Francis.

Schunk, D. H., & Cox, P. D. (1986). Strategy training and at-
tributional feedback with learning disabled students.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 201–209.

Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory
processes during computer skill acquisition: Goal and

References 531

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Self-regula- Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1983). Mental images and
tion of learning and performance: Issues and educational their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shipman, S., & Shipman, V. C. (1985). Cognitive styles: Some
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1996). Modeling and conceptual, methodological, and applied issues. In E. W.
self-efficacy influences on children’s development of self- Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 12,
regulation. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social mo- pp. 229–291). Washington, DC: American Educational
tivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. Research Association.
154–180). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University
Press. Shore, N. (1997). Rethinking the brain: New insights into
early development. New York: Families and Work Institute.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of
self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, Short, E. J., Friebert, S. E., & Andrist, C. G. (1990). Individual
195–208. differences in attentional processes as a function of age
and skill level. Learning and Individual Differences, 2,
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1998). Self-regu- 389–403.
lated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice.
New York: Guilford Press. Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review
of Educational Research, 56, 411–436.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and
control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Shuell, T. J. (1988). The role of the student in learning from
Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13,
psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 276–295.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (2008). Motivation Shuell, T. J. (1990). Phases of meaningful learning. Review of
and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and appli- Educational Research, 60, 531–547.
cations. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom
Schutz, P. A., Drogosz, L. M., White, V. E., & DiStefano, C. context. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook
(1998). Prior knowledge, attitude, and strategy use in an of educational psychology (pp. 726–764). New York:
introduction to statistics course. Learning and Individual Macmillan.
Differences, 10, 291–308.
Shultz, T. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Cognitive dissonance re-
Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. (1997). Lasting differences: duction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review,
The High/Scope Perry Preschool curriculum comparison 103, 219–240.
study through age 23. (Monographs of the High/Scope
Educational Research Foundation, 12). Ypsilanti, MI: Shute, N. (2009, February). The amazing teen brain. U. S.
High/Scope Press. News & World Report, 146, 37–39.

Schwenck, C., Bjorklund, D. F., & Schneider, W. (2007). Siegler, R. S. (1989). Mechanisms of cognitive development.
Factors influencing the incidence of utilization deficiencies Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 353–379.
and other patterns of recall/strategy-use relations in a
strategic memory task. Child Development, 78, 1771–1787. Siegler, R. S. (1991). Children’s thinking (2nd ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press. Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children’s learning. Child
Development, 71, 26–35.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness
research in the past decade: The role of theory and re- Siegler, R. S. (2005). Children’s learning. American
search design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Psychologist, 60, 769–778.
Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.
Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2006). What leads children to
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, devel- adopt new strategies? A microgenetic/cross-sectional study
opment, and death. San Francisco: Freeman. of class inclusion. Child Development, 77, 997–1015.

Seligman, M. E. P. (1991). Learned optimism. New York: Sigel, I. E., & Brodzinsky, D. M. (1977). Individual differ-
Knopf. ences: A perspective for understanding intellectual devel-
opment. In H. Hom & P. Robinson (Eds.), Psychological
Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in processes in early education (pp. 295–329). New York:
the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year Academic Press.
longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.
Silver, E. A. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem informa-
Shaul, M. S., & Ganson, H. C. (2005). The No Child Left tion: Solving related problems. Journal for Research in
Behind Act of 2001: The Federal Government’s role in Mathematics Education, 12, 54–64.
strengthening accountability for student performance. In L.
Parker (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 29, pp. Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183,
151–165). Washington, DC: American Educational 482–488.
Research Association.
Simon, H. A. (1979). Information processing models of cogni-
Shavelson, R. J., & Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The inter- tion. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 363–396.
play of theory and methods. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 74, 3–17. Simpson, T. L. (2002). Dare I oppose constructivist theory?
The Educational Forum, 66, 347–354.
Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-effi-
cacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic
writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review
81, 91–100. of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.

Shepard, R. N. (1978). The mental image. American Sivan, E. (1986). Motivation in social constructivist theory.
Psychologist, 33, 125–137. Educational Psychologist, 21, 209–233.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New
York: Free Press.

532 References

Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning
teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97. in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427–449.

Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parent-
969–977. ing practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school
achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 125–146.
Skinner, B. F. (1961). Why we need teaching machines.
Harvard Educational Review, 31, 377–398. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief vi-
sual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74(Whole
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: No. 498).
Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sperling, M., & Freedman, S. W. (2001). Research on writing.
Skinner, B. F. (1970). B. F. Skinner An autobiography. In P. B. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching
Dews (Ed.), Festschrift for B. F. Skinner (pp. 1–21). New (4th ed., pp. 379–389). Washington, DC: American
York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Educational Research Association.

Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F.
Knopf. (1979). Text-processing of domain-related information for
individuals with high and low domain knowledge.
Skinner, B. F. (1978). Reflections on behaviorism and society. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 275–290.

Skinner, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of
American Psychologist, 39, 947–954. small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathe-
matics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51.
the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42,
780–786. Stein, B. S., Littlefield, J., Bransford, J. D., & Persampieri, M.
(1984). Elaboration and knowledge acquisition. Memory &
Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? Cognition, 12, 522–529.
American Psychologist, 45, 1206–1210.
Stein, M., & Carnine, D. (1999). Designing and delivering ef-
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it fective mathematics instruction. In R. J. Stevens (Ed.),
takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A Teaching in American schools (pp. 245–269). Upper
process model of perceived control and children’s engage- Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
ment and achievement in school. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82, 22–32. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story com-
prehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Using team learning (4th ed.). Baltimore: (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120).
Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Elementary Schools.
Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). What’s in a story: An ap-
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Boston: proach to comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser
Allyn & Bacon. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp.
213–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2005). A synthesis of research on
language of reading instruction for English language learn- Steinberg, L., Brown, B. B., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1996).
ers. Review of Educational Research, 75, 247–284. Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and
what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Stenhoff, D. M., & Lignugaris/Kraft, B. (2007). A review of the
effects of peer tutoring on students with mild disabilities in
Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psy- secondary settings. Exceptional Children, 74, 8–30.
chology offer each other? Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 70, 893–912. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Cognition and instruction: Why the
marriage sometimes ends in divorce. In R. F. Dillon & R. J.
Smith, P. L., & Fouad, N. A. (1999). Subject-matter specificity Sternberg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 375–382).
of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, interests, and goals: Orlando: Academic Press.
Implications for the social-cognitive model. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 46, 461–471. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive
styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700–712.
Smith, R. E. (1989). Effects of coping skills training on gener-
alized self-efficacy and locus of control. Journal of Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of
Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 228–233. expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.

Snow, R. E. (1989). Toward assessment of cognitive and Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes re-
conative structures in learning. Educational Researcher, vealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist,
18(9), 8–14. 57, 421–457.

Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D., III. (1996). Individual Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Uttal, D. H. (1990). Beliefs and
differences in affective and cognative functions. In D. C. achievement: A study of black, white, and Hispanic chil-
Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational dren. Child Development, 61, 508–523.
psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Macmillan.
Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C.
Snowman, J. (1986). Learning tactics and strategies. In G. D. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational
Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: psychology (pp. 85–113). New York: Macmillan.
Understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp.
243–275). Orlando: Academic Press. Stipek, D. J. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In A.
Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achieve-
Spence, J. T. (1984). Gender identity and its implications for ment motivation (pp. 309–332). San Diego: Academic
the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Press.
Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation,
1984 (Vol. 32, pp. 59–95). Lincoln, NE: University of
Nebraska Press.

References 533

Stipek, D. J., & Kowalski, P. S. (1989). Learned helplessness in sentation in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational
task-orienting versus performance-orienting testing condi- Psychology, 67, 821–827.
tions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 384–391. Terry, W. S. (2009). Learning and memory: Basic principles,
processes, and procedures (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn &
Stipek, D. J., & Ryan, R. H. (1997). Economically disadvan- Bacon.
taged preschoolers: Ready to learn but further to go. Tharp, R. G. (1989). Psychocultural variables and constants:
Developmental Psychology, 33, 711–723. Effects on teaching and learning in schools. American
Psychologist, 44, 349–359.
Strain, P. S., Kerr, M. M., & Ragland, E. U. (1981). The use of Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life:
peer social initiations in the treatment of social withdrawal. Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New
In P. S. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers as York: Cambridge University Press.
behavior change agents (pp. 101–128). New York: Plenum. Thelen, M. H., Fry, R. A., Fehrenbach, P. A., & Frautschi, N.
M. (1979). Therapeutic videotape and film modeling: A re-
Strecher, V. J., DeVellis, B. M., Becker, M. H., & Rosenstock, I. view. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 701–720.
M. (1986). The role of self-efficacy in achieving health be- Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding
havior change. Health Education Quarterly, 13(1), 73–91. and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 86, 255–262.
Stright, A. D., Neitzel, C., Sears, K. G., & Hoke-Sinex, L. Thorndike, E. L. (1906). The principles of teaching: Based on
(2001). Instruction begins in the home: Relations between psychology. New York: A. G. Seiler.
parental instruction and children’s self-regulation in the Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental
classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, studies. New York: Macmillan.
456–466. Thorndike, E. L. (1912). Education: A first book. New York:
Macmillan.
Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus Thorndike, E. L. (1913a). Educational psychology: Vol. 1. The
learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of original nature of man. New York: Teachers College
learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organiz- Press.
ers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 808–820. Thorndike, E. L. (1913b). Educational psychology: Vol. 2. The
psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the Thorndike, E. L. (1914). Educational psychology: Vol. 3.
explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process Mental work and fatigue and individual differences and
approach. Psychological Review, 112, 159–192. their causes. New York: Teachers College Press.
Thorndike, E. L. (1924). Mental discipline in high school stud-
Sunshine, P. M., & DiVesta, F. J. (1976). Effects of density and ies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 1–22, 83–98.
format on letter discrimination by beginning readers with Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal
different learning styles. Journal of Educational of Psychology, 39, 212–222.
Psychology, 68, 15–19. Thorndike, E. L. (1932). The fundamentals of learning. New
York: Teachers College Press.
Suppes, P. (1974). The place of theory in educational re- Thorndike, E. L., & Gates, A. I. (1929). Elementary principles
search. Educational Researcher, 3(6), 3–10. of education. New York: Macmillan.
Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of
Swanson, H. L. (2008). Working memory and intelligence in improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency
children: What develops? Journal of Educational of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247–261,
Psychology, 100, 581–602. 384–395, 553–564.
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of
Swanson, H. L., Howard, C. B., & Sáez, L. (2006). Do different schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge.
components of working memory underlie different sub- Cognitive Psychology, 11, 82–106.
groups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Tiedemann, J. (1989). Measures of cognitive styles: A critical
Disabilities, 39, 252–269. review. Educational Psychologist, 24, 261–275.
Timberlake, W., & Farmer-Dougan, V. A. (1991). Reinforcement
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). in applied settings: Figuring out ahead of time what will
Cognitive architecture and instructional design. work. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 379–391.
Educatioinal Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. Titchener, E. B. (1909). Lectures on the experimental psychol-
ogy of the thought processes. New York: Macmillan.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Tobias, C. U. (1994). The way they learn: How to discover and
Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching teach to your child’s strengths. Colorado Springs: Focus on
courses online: A review of the research. Review of the Family Publishing.
Educational Research, 76, 93–135. Tollefson, N., Tracy, D. B., Johnsen, E. P., Farmer, A. W., &
Buenning, M. (1984). Goal setting and personal responsi-
Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation. New York: Henry Holt. bility training for LD adolescents. Psychology in the
Taylor, A. M., Josberger, M., & Whitely, S. E. (1973). Schools, 21, 224–233.
Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and
Elaboration instruction and verbalization as factors facili- men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Reprinted
tating retarded children’s recall. Journal of Educational 1949, 1951, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
Psychology, 64, 341–346.
Tennyson, R. D. (1980). Instructional control strategies and
content structure as design variables in concept acquisition
using computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 72, 525–532.
Tennyson, R. D. (1981). Use of adaptive information for ad-
visement in learning concepts and rules using computer-
assisted instruction. American Educational Research
Journal, 18, 425–438.
Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O. (1980). The teaching of concepts:
A review of instructional design research literature. Review
of Educational Research, 50, 55–70.
Tennyson, R. D., Steve, M. W., & Boutwell, R. C. (1975).
Instance sequence and analysis of instance attribute repre-

534 References

Tolman, E. C. (1942). Drives toward war. New York: Tudge, J. R. H., & Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on ed-
Appleton-Century-Crofts. ucation: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual
approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H.
Tolman, E. C. (1949). There is more than one kind of learn- Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of con-
ing. Psychological Review, 56, 144–155. tributions (pp. 207–228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tolman, E. C. (1951). Collected papers in psychology. Tudge, J. R. H., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget,
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the
social world and cognitive development. Human
Tolman, E. C. (1959). Principles of purposive behavior. In S. Development, 36, 61–81.
Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2, pp.
92–157). New York: McGraw-Hill. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E.
Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory
Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, C. H. (1930). Introduction and re- (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.
moval of reward, and maze performance in rats. University
of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 257–275. Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. American
Scientist, 62, 74–82.
Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., & Kalish, D. (1946a). Studies in
spatial learning. I. Orientation and the short-cut. Journal Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford,
of Experimental Psychology, 36, 13–24. England: Clarendon Press.

Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., & Kalish, D. (1946b). Studies in Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cogni-
spatial learning. II. Place learning versus response learn- tive load associated with discovery learning and worked
ing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 221–229. examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341.

Tolson, J. (2006, October 23). Is there room for the soul? New Tweney, R. D., & Budzynski, C. A. (2000). The scientific sta-
challenges to our most cherished beliefs about self and the tus of American psychology in 1900. American
human spirit. U. S. News & World Report, 141, 56–63. Psychologist, 55, 1014–1017.

Tracey, T. J. G. (2002). Development of interests and compe- Ullmann, L. P., & Krasner, L. (1965). Case studies in behavior
tency beliefs: A 1-year longitudinal study of fifth- to eighth- modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
grade students using the ICA-R and structural equation
modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 148–163. Ulrich, R., Stachnik, T., & Mabry, J. (1966). Control of human
behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Trappl, R. (1985). Artificial intelligence: A one-hour course. In
R. Trappl (Ed.), Impacts of artificial intelligence: Scientific, Underwood, B. J. (1961). Ten years of massed practice on
technological, military, economic, societal, cultural, and distributed practice. Psychological Review, 68, 229–247.
political (pp. 5–30). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Underwood, B. J. (1983). Attributes of memory. Glenview, IL:
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., & Nagy, G. (2009). Scott, Foresman.
Within-school social comparison: How students perceive
the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual
Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 853–866. differences in working memory capacity: Active mainte-
nance in primary memory and controlled search from sec-
Trawick-Smith, J. (2003). Early childhood development: A ondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.
multicultural perspective (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Merrill/Prentice Hall. Valentine, C. W. (1930a). The innate base of fear. Journal of
Genetic Psychology, 37, 394–419.
Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Review of the Torrance Tests of
Creative Thinking. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), Ninth Mental Valentine, C. W. (1930b). The psychology of imitation with
Measurements Yearbook (pp. 1633–1634). Lincoln, NE: special reference to early childhood. British Journal of
Buros Institute of Mental Measurement. Psychology, 21, 105–132.

Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The rela-
and educational implications. Educational Psychology tion between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A
Review, 7, 301–312. meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39,
111–133.
Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem
solving: The history, development, and implications for Vandell, D. L. (2000). Parents, peer groups, and other social-
gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child izing influences. Developmental Psychology, 36, 699–710.
Quarterly, 49, 342–353.
van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J.
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learn-
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, ing: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visual-
242–248. izations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21–30.

Treisman, A. M. (1964). Verbal cues, language, and meaning van Laar, C. (2000). The paradox of low academic achieve-
in selective attention. American Journal of Psychology, 77, ment but high self-esteem in African American students:
206–219. An attributional account. Educational Psychology Review,
12, 33–61.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration
theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. VanLehn, K. (1996). Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual
Review of Psychology, 47, 513–539.
Treisman, A. M. (1992). Perceiving and re-perceiving objects.
American Psychologist, 47, 862–875. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L.
(2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional
Trevarthen, C. (1998). Brain development. In R. L. Gregory design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist,
(Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 101–110). 38, 5–13.
Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). theory and complex learning: Recent developments and
Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17,
Educational Research, 68, 202–248. 147–177.

References 535

Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). Watson, J. B. (1926b). What the nursery has to say about in-
Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education stincts. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925 (pp.
and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37, 140–152. 1–35). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional re-
learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14, 261–312. actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1–14.

Vellutino, F. R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive and neu- Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-per-
ropsychological foundations of word identification in poor ceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender
and normally developing readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students.
P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Child Development, 75, 1556–1574.
reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 571–608). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom
experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.
Verdi, M. P., & Kulhavy, R. W. (2002). Learning with maps and
texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14, Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement mo-
27–46. tivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

Vermeer, H. J., Boekaerts, M., & Seegers, G. (2000). Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in educa-
Motivational and gender differences: Sixth-grade students’ tion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 616–622.
mathematical problem-solving behavior. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 92, 308–315. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories,
and research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Veroff, J. (1969). Social comparison and the development of
achievement motivation. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of
Achievement-related motives in children (pp. 46–101). motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational
New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Psychology Review, 12, 1–14.

Vispoel, W. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An ex- Weiner, B. (2004).Attribution theory revisited: Transforming
tension of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) cultural plurality into theoretical unity. In D. M. McInerney
model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 134–153. & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 13–29).
Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2006). Motivational effects on
self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attributional perspec-
Psychology Review, 18, 239–253. tive and the social psychology of perceived competence.
In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of compe-
Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., & Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text gen- tence and motivation (pp. 73–84). New York: Guilford
eration and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge Press.
individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 19, 651–657. Weiner, B., Frieze, I. H., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., &
Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success
Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Carretero, M. (1995). Acquiring intel- and failure. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
lectual skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 155–181.
Weiner, B., Graham, S., Taylor, S. E., & Meyer, W. (1983).
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Social cognition in the classroom. Educational
MIT Press. Psychologist, 18, 109–124.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of
higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social
University Press. Psychology, 15, 1–20.

Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. Weiner, B., & Peter, N. (1973). A cognitive-developmental
1. Problems of general psychology (R. W. Rieber & A. S. analysis of achievement and moral judgments.
Carton, Vol. Eds.; N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum. Developmental Psychology, 9, 290–309.

Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and af- Weinstein, C. E. (1978). Elaboration skills as a learning strat-
fective development (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman. egy. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp.
31–55). New York: Academic Press.
Wallas, G. (1921). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt,
Brace, & World. Weinstein, C. E., & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study strategies for
lifelong learning. Washington, DC: American
Wallis, C. (2004, May 10). What makes teens tick. Time, 163, Psychological Association.
56–62, 65.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learn-
Washington, V., & Bailey, U. J. O. (1995). Project Head Start: ing strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research
Models and strategies for the twenty-first century. New on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
York: Garland.
Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (1990). LASSI-HS: Learning
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New and Study Strategies Inventory—High School Version.
horizons in psychology (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth, Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing Company.
England: Penguin.
Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). LASSI:
Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The psychology of Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H
deduction: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: & H Publishing Company.
Harvard University Press.
Weiss, M. R. (1983). Modeling and motor performance: A de-
Watson, J. B. (1916). The place of the conditioned-reflex in velopmental perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise
psychology. Psychological Review, 23, 89–116. and Sport, 54, 190–197.

Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: Norton. Weiss, M. R., Ebbeck, V., & Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M. (1993).
Watson, J. B. (1926a). Experimental studies on the growth of Developmental and psychological factors related to chil-
dren’s observational learning of physical skills. Pediatric
the emotions. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925 Exercise Science, 5, 301–317.
(pp. 37–57). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

536 References

Weiss, M. R., & Klint, K. A. (1987). “Show and tell” in the Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of
gymnasium: An investigation of developmental differences learning and performance: Issues and educational appli-
in modeling and verbal rehearsal of motor skills. Research cations (pp. 101–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 234–241. Wigfield, A., Byrnes, J. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Development
during early and middle adolescence. In P. A. Alexander &
Wellman, H. M. (1977). Tip of the tongue and feeling of P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology
knowing experiences: A developmental study of memory (2nd ed., pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
monitoring. Child Development, 48, 13–21. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of
achievement task values: A theoretical analysis.
Wellman, H. M. (1988). The early development of memory Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.
strategies. In F. Weinert & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Memory Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory
development: Universal changes and individual differ- of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25,
ences (pp. 3–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 68–81.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of com-
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. petence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achieve-
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ment values from childhood through adolescence. In A.
Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement
Wentzel, K. R. (1992). Motivation and achievement in adoles- motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego: Academic Press.
cence: A multiple goals perspective. In D. H. Schunk & J. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The devel-
L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. opment of children’s motivation in school contexts. In P.
287–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. D. Pearson (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 23,
pp. 73–118). Washington, DC: American Educational
Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social goals and social relationships as Research Association.
motivators of school adjustment. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wigfield, A., Hoa, L. W., & Klauda, S. L. (2008). The role of
Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding chil- achievement values in the regulation of achievement be-
dren’s school adjustment (pp. 226–247). Cambridge, haviors. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.),
England: Cambridge University Press. Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research,
and applications (pp. 169–195). New York: Taylor &
Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Francis.
Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Expectancy
and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. M.
96, 195–203. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp.
165–198). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-
Harper & Row. value theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.).
Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 55–76). New York:
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psy- Routledge.
chological processes: A clarification and application of Wigfield, A., & Wagner, A. L. (2005). Competence, motivation,
Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1–22. and identity development during adolescence. In A. J.
Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and
Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: motivation (pp. 222–239). New York: Guilford Press.
Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch Williams, J. M., & Tolmie, A. (2000). Conceptual change in bi-
(Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal devel- ology: Group interaction and the understanding of inheri-
opment” (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. tance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18,
625–649.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication, and cogni- Windholz, G. (1997). Ivan P. Pavlov: An overview of his life
tion: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge and psychological work. American Psychologist, 52,
University Press. 941–946.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as
Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2005). Social comparison and self- the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the concep-
evaluations of competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck tual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing
(Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72, 131–175.
566–578). New York: Guilford Press. Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple
forms of school science investigation: The impact of pre-
White, P. H., Kjelgaard, M. M., & Harkins, S. G. (1995). service instruction on teachers’ understandings of model-
Testing the contribution of self-evaluation to goal-setting based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal,
effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 43, 783–835.
69–79. Winett, R. A., & Winkler, R. C. (1972). Current behavior mod-
ification in the classroom: Be still, be quiet, be docile.
White R. (2001). The revolution in research on science teach- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 499–504.
ing. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology re-
teaching (4th ed., pp. 457–471). Washington, DC: American search: The study of learning environments. Educational
Educational Research Association. Psychology Review, 14, 331–351.

White, R. T., & Tisher, R. P. (1986). Research on natural sci-
ences. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on
teaching (3rd ed., pp. 874–905). New York: Macmillan.

White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of
competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

Whitely, S. E., & Taylor, A. M. (1973). Overt verbalization and
the continued production of effective elaborations by EMR
children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78,
193–198.

Wickelgren, W. A. (1979). Cognitive psychology. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s achievement values
in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H.

References 537

Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the
models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114, 843–863.
D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and aca-
demic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). Teaching
153– 189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. problem solving through computer simulations. American
Educational Research Journal, 25, 72–86.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regu-
lated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Woodworth, R. S. (1918). Dynamic psychology. New York:
Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and Columbia University Press.
practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psy-
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. R. (2008). The weave of motiva- chology (Rev. ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
tion and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learn- Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’
ing: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of
New York: Taylor & Francis. Educational Psychology, 82, 81–91.

Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2003). Overt and covert verbal Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). How
problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, to optimize learning from animated models: A review of
awareness, and relations with task performance in chil- guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational
dren aged 5 to 17. Child Development, 74, 659–678. Research, 78, 645–675.

Witkin, H. A. (1969). Social influences in the development of Wurtele, S. K. (1986). Self-efficacy and athletic performance:
cognitive style. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of social- A review. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4,
ization theory and research (pp. 687–706). Chicago: Rand 290–301.
McNally.
Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln, NE:
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. University of Nebraska Press.
(1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive
styles and their educational implications. Review of Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength
Educational Research, 47, 1–64. of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of
Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.
Wolfe, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into
classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Zeiler, M. (1977). Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling
Supervision and Curriculum Development. variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),
Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 201–232). Englewood
Wolleat, P. L., Pedro, J. D., Becker, A. D., & Fennema, E. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(1980). Sex differences in high school students’ causal at-
tributions of performance in mathematics. Journal for Zepeda, S. J., & Mayers, R. S. (2006). An analysis of research
Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 356–366. on block scheduling. Review of Educational Research, 76,
137–170.
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Zhang, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of in-
tellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 1–53.
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college stu-
dents’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Zimmerman, B. J. (1977). Modeling. In H. Hom & P. Robinson
Psychology, 90, 224–235. (Eds.), Psychological processes in children’s early educa-
tion (pp. 37–70). New York: Academic Press.
Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school stu-
dents’ motivational regulation and their use of learning Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner:
strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary
and Individual Differences, 11, 281–299. Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.

Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning
underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H.
Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1–25).
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation New York: Springer-Verlag.
between goal orientation and students’ motivational be-
liefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning
Differences, 8, 211–238. and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive per-
spective. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 173–201.
Wood, D. A., Rosenberg, M. S., & Carran, D. T. (1993). The ef-
fects of tape-recorded self-instruction cues on the mathe- Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regu-
matics performance of students with learning disabilities. lation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 250–258, 269. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of
learning and performance: Issues and educational appli-
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tu- cations (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
toring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology
and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of
academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instruc-
Wood, G., & Underwood, B. J. (1967). Implicit responses and tional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.),
conceptual similarity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective
Verbal Behavior, 6, 1–10. practice (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford Press.

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social
ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex deci- cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M.
sion-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39).
56, 407–415. San Diego: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning
and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In