5. 6. 7. 8.
VIDEO CRITIQUE GUIDE In this exercise, your task is to provide constructive feedback for the instructor in the video. Attend to and describe the instructor’s specific actions as well as his or her overall instructional strategies. Focus also on student reactions and engagement; student reactions may be indications of the lesson’s effectiveness, and practicing attending to student reactions may help you betterrecognize cues from your own students. Please do not respond to each question independently, but rather provide an overall critique that incorporates your responses in a single, coherent body of feedback. No. Video Critique Guide Comments 1. Did the instructor state the instructional objectives of the lesson and summarize the lesson’s main ideas? Objektif pengajaran dan membuat rumusan. 2. What techniques, if any, did the instructor use to ensure that the presentation followed a clear logic, including transitions between topics, and did/how did the instructor convey the organization to students? (e.g. Did the presentation include an outline showing the relationships between different concepts? Did the instructor summarize the main ideas?) Teknik penyampaian. 3. Was the instructor’s vocabulary appropriate for the audience, reflecting a sensitivity to the prior knowledge of the students? Penggunaan Bahasa.
4. Did the instructor incorporate a variety of instructional strategies to reach the instructional objectives? If so, which strategies did he/she use? (given the brief nature of the video clip, the instructor may only have used one strategy [e.g. lecture, discussion, small group activity, independent writing assignment, etc.]) Strategi pengajaran dan pembelajaran. 5. Was the content and depth of that content appropriate for the audience and instructional objectives? Did the instructor define new terminology, provide concrete examples of abstract concepts, and present multiple perspectives from different theories or backgrounds? Kesesuaian isi kandungan. 6. Was the presentation paced so that the audience had sufficient time to process new information and integrate it with their prior knowledge? Pengurusan masa. 7. How did the instructor use audiovisual aids to complement the material presented? Did the instructor provide adequate time for processing of audiovisual materials? Penggunaan alat audiovisual. 8. In what ways did the instructor use questions to assess students’ prior knowledge, understanding, or ability to apply their knowledge? What techniques did the instructor use to encourage students to ask questions to advance the conversation? Kaedah menyoal.
9. What did the instructor do particularly well? What strategies, techniques, or materials did the instructor use that was novel or innovative? Aspek yang terbaik. 10. What might you have done differently from this instructor and why do you think that would have better facilitated student learning? Aspek yang perlu penambahbaikan.
VIDEO CRITIQUE ASSESSMENT GUIDE Date : Video Critique Team : Title of the Presentation : Purpose/content : Audience/setting : Rate the teams’ video critique on the following scale : 1 = Needs Attention2 = Developing 3 = Proficient 0 = n/a 1. Organization 1 Did the video critique team comment on the degree to which the teacher clearly articulated the instructional objectives and the presentation followed a single, coherent logic? Discuss. 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team describe and discuss the transitions the teacher used (or failed to use) to shift between topics? 1 2 3 0 3. Did the video critique team note whether the presenter summarized main ideas, including by referring to an outline during the presentation and summarizing main ideas? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Organization 1 2 3 0
2. Language 1 Did the video critique team comment on the appropriateness of the presenter’s vocabulary for the audience’s prior knowledge? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Language 1 2 3 0 3. Strategy 1 Did the video critique team identify the different instructional strategies the teacher used to reach the instructional objectives? Describe. 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team discuss the appropriateness of the amount and depth of content for the students’ prior knowledge? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Instructional Strategies 1 2 3 0 4. Diversity 1 Did the video critique team comment on whether the presenter defined new terms and used examples from multiple theories and perspectives? 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team comment on and describe the teacher’s use of examples from multiple theories and cultural perspectives, as well as concrete examples of abstract concepts? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Attention to Diversity 1 2 3 0
5. Audiovisual 1 Did the video critique team critically evaluate the degree to which the audiovisual aids complemented the material presented rather than replacing it? 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team comment on the orientation of the presenter in the presence of the AV aids (i.e. whether the presenter continued to face the audience, rather than the AV aids, when the aids were presented)? 1 2 3 0 3. Did the video critique team discuss whether the AV aids contained too much content for the audience to attend to them and maintain their attention on the presenter? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Audiovisuals 1 2 3 0 6. Time Management 1 Did the video critique team note whether the presentation maintained a consistent pace from beginning to end and concluded within the allotted time? 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team note whether the presenter provided the students with sufficient time to process new information and integrate with their prior knowledge? 1 2 3 0 3. Did the video critique team make note of whether the presenter provided sufficient time to include and address audience questions during the presentation, afterward, or both? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Time Management 1 2 3 0
7. Active Inquiry 1 Did the video critique team note whether the presenter used questions to assess students’ prior knowledge and understanding of the material being presented? 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team note whether the presenter handled all questions openly and objectively? 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Use/Handling of Questions 1 2 3 0 8. Delivery 1 Did the video critique team comment on the presenter’s deliberate versus unconscious body movement to engage the audience? Describe. 1 2 3 0 2. Did the video critique team comment on the presenter’s use of his/her voice to engage the audience, as well as refraining from using audible pauses (e.g. “um,” “uh”)? Describe. 1 2 3 0 Discussion of Teachers’ Content Delivery 1 2 3 0
Summary 1. Organization 2. Language 3. Strategy 4. Diversity 5. Audiovisuals 6. Time Management 7. Active Inquiry 8. Delivery Total Score
FORMAT LAPORAN PLC Sesi Perkongsian Guru Nama Ahli Kumpulan : Tempat/Tarikh/Masa : Fokus : Nyatakan fokus perkongsian yang dijalankan Interpretasi : Apakah aspek yang paling penting/menarik/relevan yang dibincangkan? Adakan perkongsian ini boleh memberi impak kepada pembelajaran murid? Bagaimana? Hasil : Apa yang saya pelajari? Bagaimanakah perbincangan ini boleh memberi kesan kepada profesionalisme saya?
RUJUKAN NOMBOR FAIL PANITIA MATA PELAJARAN BIL NO FAIL MATA PELAJARAN 1 600-3/2/5 BAHASA MELAYU 2 600-3/2/6 BAHASA INGGERIS 3 600-3/2/7 BAHASA CINA 4 600-3/2/10 MATEMATIK 5 600-3/2/11 SAINS 6 600-3/2/12 PENDIDIKAN ISLAM 7 600-3/2/13 PENDIDIKAN MORAL 8 600-3/2/14 SEJARAH 9 600-3/2/15 REKA BENTUK & TEKNOLOGI 10 600-3/2/17 PENDIDIKAN JASMANI & KESIHATAN 11 600-3/2/23(1) PERNIAGAAN 12 600-3/2/23(2) PERAKAUNAN 13 600-3/2/23(3) EKONOMI 14 600-3/2/24 SAINS KOMPUTER 15 600-3/2/28 KIMIA 16 600-3/2/29 MATEMATIK TAMBAHAN 17 600-3/2/30 BAHASA JERMAN 18 600-3/2/31 FIZIK 19 600-3/2/32 BIOLOGI 20 600-3/2/35 PENDIDIKAN SENI VISUAL 21 600-3/2/58 GEOGRAFI 22 600-3/2/59 REKA BENTUK GRAFIK DIGITAL 23 600-3/2/60 SAINS RUMAH TANGGA
L AG U S E KO LA H Di sinilah lahir warga mulia Sepadu berupaya Untuk ibu dan bapa untuk nusa bangsa Kita kotakan kata-kata Kebersihan yang diutamakan Diri dan sekitaran Menimba segalanya ilmu yang berguna Mendukung wawasan negara Berdaya maju, berakhlak mulia Cogan kata sekolah kita Dengan tabah dan yakin di hati Mencapai cita-cita luhur dan murni Pendidikan yang sempurna di sini Minda, jasmani, rohani Akan lahirlah pemimpin yang berwibawa Ke arah hidup sejahtera. SM K SEKSYEN 5 WANGSA MAJ U, KUALA LU M PU R NO TEL : 03-4142 7822 NO FAKS : 03-4142 0832 EMAIL : [email protected] [email protected]