SAAM-TH-003_COMPACT_INTERNATIONAL_20221116

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

1.General Management Remark Rating % Doc. N/A

No. Question 0 40 60 80 100

1.1 Which are the plans for your company? -- see company presentation –
Markets, products and growth (usually
included in comp. presentation) Product range: Disc brake, Brake shoes, Brake lining
With highly capable of testing facilities e.g., SNT brake dynamometer, Link truck
1.2 Is there a system for environmental break dynamometer, NVH dynamometer (acc. to SAE/ISO/JASO) and break field
management according to ISO 14001:2009 test evaluation.
implemented?
Certified ISO 14001:2015 (#SCUK002731E) Validity 2024.04.24 by SOCOTEC.
1.3 Are you an OE / OES supplier?
- Tier 1, Tier 2, etc. Only OES&AAM business.
Under the brand name of Compact, Diamond, Kenji, Musashi
1.4 Are you able to supply products without
OE-marking (OE-number, OE-logo)? yes, available as per customer requirements.

1.5 Only European locations! For reference:
Does the quality of your parts comply with UN ECE R90 Standard regulatory complied:
EC Block Exemption Regulation 1400/2002? E1 Germany, E4 Netherland, E9 Spain and E1 UK

1.6 Is there a capacity plan for the required Disc brake pads: 2.4M sets/year
products and necessary machines? Brake shoes assembly: 720K sets/year
Brake lining: 444K sets/year

Can be fulfilled Aftermarket Schaeffler requirements.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 1 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

1.7 Do you undertake machine capability studies? Not applicable

1.8 Do you produce parts on more than one 2 factories for manufacturing of brake

factory? - Phetchaburi for passenger car. no rating!
no rating!
If yes where and which parts are produced - Samuthsakhon for truck.

there?

1.9 If cleared with supplier checklist not required! Not applicable

Commercial protective clause

Extra Document!

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 2 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

2. Quality Management Remark 0 Rating % Doc. N/A

No.. Question Certified IATF 16949:2016 (#0396798) Validity 2024-04-30 by TUV Rheinland 40 60 80 100
2.1 Is there a quality management system Certified ISO9001:2015 (#01 100 086212) Validity 2024-04-30 by TUV Rheinland
G/QESD/Q
implanted according to TS 16949:2009, ISO M-01
9001:2008 or equivalent? 10.11.2564

2.2 Does the supplier have our QAA in Hands? Following Quality manual having “IMS document matrix” which are comparing for
Are there any questions concerning the QAA? relative internal process with QMS/EMS requirements.
Can you commit to the requirements?
Refer signed standard QAA (2022.08.18)
2.3 Do you have a system (APQP, PPAP, etc) to with some amendment in QAA brochures which can be accepted.
ensure Schaeffler quality requirements?
APQP/PPAP can be followed as per customer requirements. C/APQP/P
2.4 Do you use process improvement tools? M-01
Six Sigma, TQM, 5S Experienced in AIAG PPAP requirements for OES Customer. Internal procedure
has been presented with simplified APQP due to the supplier are designed
products themself.
Productivity improvement project have been presented with significant
improvement since 2017 – 2021 for waste reduction and improve productivity by
adding automated cold press machine.

2.5 Can you show us the Quality Documentation of Certification can be provided as per customer requirements. (e.g., product

our products if required? dimensional, material properties, functional performance, and dynamometer test

acc. to SAE J 2521.

Remark: Wear test acc. to SAE J 2707 is not available.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 3 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

2.6 Is there a supplier evaluation system? Supplier selection process have been checked with proper selection criteria for G/PC/PM-
Are records of acceptable suppliers available? approved supplier list. New supplier assessment is required for production 02
material. G/PC/FM-
2.7 Are supplier audits carried out? 09
Insufficient of the requirement/ criteria about Code of conduct evaluation for
supplier. Additional requirement needs to be considered.

Supplier audit have been planned as per supplier performance evaluation
basically together with problem history, and customer concerned. The planning is
carried out in 2022.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 4 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

No. Question Remark Rating % Doc. N/A

2.8 Are internal product / process audits carried Internal system/process/product audit are planned annually. 0 40 60 80 100
out? Fulfilled planned schedule and corrective actions closure with qualified internal
auditor are on tracked. G/QES-

ES/PM-02

Product audit to be required additional clearer approach/description about

selection criteria of annual requalification by product family. (if there is no

customer requirements and no production planning in year.)

2.9 Is the necessary measuring equipment available Necessary measuring equipment are available at workstation. (Some of them

at each workplace? needed the support from laboratory.)

2.10 How do you monitor the measuring equipment? Calibration system have been checked with well managed and identified. The C/MCS/P
M-01
Regular calibration and verification certification of equipment with accredited laboratory have been used properly as
G/PAD/F
per laboratory scope. Measurement equipment-controlled list are on tracked. M-01

2.11 What kind of actions do you take to eliminate Customer complaint (field claim) record have been presented which mainly the
the causes of nonconformities? problem is noise problem. Usually, the root cause came from misusing of user as
Meeting Room: documentation (8D) per conclusion. Problem solving tool is required for 8D. Example of 8D have been
Plant: Identification, separation checked and acceptable. And can be adapted as per customer requirements.

Customer lesson learn have been analysed and shared thought website.
https://www.compact-brake.com/en/news-list/4

2.12 Is there a training plan for each employee Nonconformities control is well managed at shop floor area.
available?
Training processes handled by human resources departments who will plan for
annual training needs for all employee level. And make sure the training plan are
on track. Provided of training could be OJT, Internal/External Training.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 5 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

No. Question Remark Rating % Doc. N/A

2.13 Is there a training plan for all levels of Training evidence have been presented together with pre/post test results of all 0 40 60 80 100
organisation? level employees and will be maintained the skill matrix level for incentive and
Are records kept for training? annual performance evaluation purpose as well. G/HRD/P

M-01

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 6 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

3. Process control Remark Rating % Doc. N/A

No. Question Identified of the material in each process step are managed well with labelling 0 40 60 80 100
3.1 Are materials and products identifiable control with detail of lot number, operation, part number.

through the complete processes?

There are some of production areas where is no proper identified of part status
(e.g., assembly of accessory to prevent mixing, wrong parts)

3.2 Are the procedures and work instructions Necessary production documents (e.g., work instruction, master procedure,
available? parameter control, record form) are available at workstation.
Necessary documents at each workplace?

3.3 How do you ensure that only the actual / latest Supplier process audit will have to check the document control system in all

version of documents is available? production areas to ensure validity of the documents. (Document control process

was checked with well managed.)

3.4 Do you use process control throughout your Entire process control is well managed as per control plan. The record has been

operations? maintained properly. Operator works well under guidance of work instruction.

Consistent production process?

KPI-monitoring for process control? There is no proper process control of glue resting time (min. 1 day) before use in

next station. To be made clearer on criteria and control in production area.

3.5 What kind of preventive actions to avoid non- Control plan C/QIS/FM-02(0) AM-DP-001 has been checked.

conformities do you take? FMEA C/QIS/FM-04(0) AM AM-DP-001 has been checked.

FMEA, Control Plans etc.

Required the review of P FMEA to be matched with current process control (e.g.,

glue resting time – see 3.4) especially high severity score.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 7 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

3.6 Is there a continuous improvement process Kaizen suggestion form (annual target have been deployed to all employees) and
implanted? get good cooperation internally.

3.7 Do you have a maintenance plan? Machine rank is available base on the spare machine situation.
maintenance interval, service plan
plant cleaning “Factorium” software using for preventive maintenance. Well managed.
Recording of the planning, actual, results together repair of the machine.
Ability to see the historical of the machine in linkage with spare part control.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 8 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

No. Question Remark Rating % Doc. N/A

3.8 What actions do you take to ensure handling, 0 40 60 80 100
storage and packaging of the parts?
Final packaging of finish goods will be managed by manufacturing plant will well

managed and arrangement at workstation. Before transfer to warehouse center.

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 9 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

Audit final score: 95 %

Evaluation Report:

Overall Quality management system of Compact international 1994 Co., Ltd are in very good level.
Since the supplier are familiar with ISO9001 and also IATF 16949 since 2008. And the auditee team have well experience and quite open discussion.
Few deviation have been observed and agreed during the audit time to be take over for improvement opportunities.

Explanation of signs:

/ : Discuss in meeting room/factory
Doc.: Copies of given documents
N/A: Check if not applicable

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 10 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC

Supplier Evaluation Supplier: Compact International (1994) Co., Ltd Audit-No.: SAAM-TH-003
Questionnaire Location: Phetchaburi Date: 15.11.2022

Corrective action plan: Deficiencies Actions
Result: Rating to 60% ---

---

Target and responsibilities:

2023-01-16

Reason for 60% - 100% rating:

--- refer to deviation sheet ---

Purchasing/ technical supplier management Digitally signed by

Kaewluang, Peerasak

Reason: Approved

Date: 2022.11.16

Date: _______________ Signature: _________________1_1:_09_:06_+_07_'00_'

0%: Not included in the system - no procedures 80%: Satisfactory, meets requirements, good Auditor: Peerasak Kaewluang Page 11 of 11
40%: Included in the system but insufficient evidence 100%: documentation and performance RP/SMT-YQ
60%: Procedures are being followed, minor anomalies rigorously controlled and performed

©Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH
C:\USERS\KAEWLPER\DOCUMENTS\00_DESKTOP_PC02040088_BACKUP\02_SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\02_3_SEQ_AAM\COMPACTS_INTERNATIONAL_1994\RF ASL 60184 SUPPLIER_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_[EN].DOCX
RF ASL 60184 Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire - Version: A, Date: 09.2019 05.2022 – reviewed: A. Cherlet – approved: J. Ising
Geltungsbereich: Der organisatorische Geltungsbereich des Formulars erstreckt sich auf die Schaeffler Automotive Aftermarket GmbH & Co. KG (alle deutschen Standorte).

PUBLIC