The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer Dr Fiona Lalloo Consultant in Genetic Medicine St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by , 2016-03-30 04:21:02

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer Dr Fiona Lalloo Consultant in Genetic Medicine St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer

Dr Fiona Lalloo
Consultant in Genetic Medicine
St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer

• Lifetime (10 year) risk of breast cancer
• Likelihood of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer

Aims

• Individualised lifetime risk assessment
• Accurate
• Screening, chemoprevention, surgery
• Tool for decision re mutation testing

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer

• Highly penetrant dominant cancer predisposition
syndromes

– BRCA1/2
– Li Fraumeni

• Moderate penetrance syndromes

– CHEK2

• Familial aggregation

Risk assessment in familial breast cancer

• Classical features

– Early age of onset
– Multiple primaries
– May not be site specific

• Three generation family tree

– Remember sex limitation in males with respect to breast
cancer

• Confirm pathology if any doubt

Risk assessment

• Individual risk assessment

– Different models available
– Manual methods
– Computer programmes

Risk Assessment

• Appropriate models

• Gail
– 2852 women with invasive breast cancer and 3146
controls compared for age, FHx, no of biopsies, age at
menarche, first live birth, menopause
– most useful for women with no family history and
regular screening

• Claus
– 3400 women with breast cancer and 3600 controls
– Most valuable for women whose major risk is their
family history

Risk Assessment

• Computer models

• BRCAPRO
– Also calculates likelihood of being a mutation carrier.

• Tyrer-Cuzick
– Based on IBIS studies

• Boadicea
– Estimates the likelihood of detecting BRCA1/2 mutation

Cancers in Cohort

Observed Expected E/O 95%
(O) (E) confidence
intervals
Gail 64 44.3
0.69 0.54-0.90
Claus 64 48.56
0.76 0.59-0.99
Ford 64 42.28
0.66 0.52-0.86
Tyrer-Cusack 64 69.56
1.09 0.85-1.41
Manual 64 77.92
1.22 0.95-1.58









Mutation testing

• NICE guidelines allow NHS mutation screening if
likelihood of mutation 20% or over.

• Use Manchester scoring system for working out if
eligible for mutation screening.

Manchester scoring system

BRCA1 BRCA2
5
FBC<30 6 4
3
FBC 30-39 4 2
1
FBC 40-49 3 8
5
FBC 50-59 2 5
5
FBC>59 1 1
2
MBC <60 5
1
MBC>59 5

Ovarian cancer <60 8

Ovarian cancer >59 5

Pancreatic cancer 0

Prostate cancer 0
<60

Prostate cancer 0

> 59

Pathology BRCA1 adj BRCA2 adj

Her2+ -4 0
0
Lobular -2 0
0
DCIS only -1 0
0
LCIS only -4 0
0
Grade 1 IDC -2 0
0
Grade 2 IDC 0

Grade 3 IDC +2

ER pos -1

ER neg +1

Grade 3 triple neg +4

Mutation testing

• Computer models

– BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, Tyrer-Cusisck, Myriad II

– Antoniou et al
– BOADICEA only model accurately predicting overall

numbers of mutations detected

Antoniou et al, J Med Genet, 2008;44;425-431

Management of high risk women

• Screening

– Mammography
– MRI

• Chemoprevention

– Tamoxifen
– Razor

• Surgery

– Bilateral Risk Reducing mastectomy
– Risk Reducing Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

Summary

• Possible to undertake individual risk assessment
• Possible to stratify likelihood of detecting mutation

within a family

• Management options include screening and
preventive surgery


Click to View FlipBook Version