From my wife’s attorney’s “Trial Management Certificate ...

From
my
wife’s
attorney’s
“Trial
Management
Certificate”
faxed
to
my
attorney’s

office
after‐hours
on
Friday
03‐17‐06,
for
the
final
divorce
hearing
scheduled
for

Tuesday
03‐21‐06:




(I
was
always
the
sole­decision
maker
for
my
children
prior
to
the
divorce,
due
to
my

wife’s
immaturity
and
inability
to
make
proper
decisions.
“Temporary
Findings
and

Orders”
were
previously
obtained
by
fraud,
and
therefore,
were
void.
Sole
decision­
making
ability
was
also
controlled
by
fraudulently
obtaining
restraining
orders
that

would
“tie
the
judge’s
hands”
for
temporary
orders
and
permanent
orders.)




(The
children
were
always
well
rested
when
with
me
and
often
went
to
bed
early
on

Sunday.
The
lies
about
not
getting
to
bed
on
time
and
my
parenting
time
needing
to
be

closely
monitored
by
a
CFI
(who
was
obviously
fully
in
their
camp
when
this
was

written)
resulted
in
the
divorce
judge
restricting
my
time
even
further.)




(I
was
involuntarily
unemployed
due
to
my
wife
and
her
attorney’s
continued
hold
on

my
“tools
and
necessary
work
equipment”,
which
are
still
being
held
in
contempt
to

this
day
in
2009.
This
and
the
lies
about
my
income,
with
no
mention
of
the
facts

surrounding
my
semi­retirement,
resulted
in
the
divorce
judge’s
clearly
erroneous

findings
regarding
my
work
status
and
income.
My
wife’s
attorney
also
knew
that
the

statement,
“before
he
began
planning
the
divorce”,
was
false.)




(My
wife
got
exactly
what
she
asked
for
in
regards
to
health
insurance
and
I
have

maintained
it
since,
but
have
no
insurance
for
myself.
The
exemptions
were
split
by
the

divorce
judge,
but
my
wife
has
continued
to
claim
all
five
exemptions
and
refuses
to

provide
copies
of
her
tax
returns
for
court
and
administrative
processes,
which
is

another
contempt.)





 1


(Our
first
home
was
purchased
just
a
few
days
before
our
wedding
in
1990
and
since
I

was
between
jobs
and
she
could
qualify
on
her
own,
she
signed
the
papers
by
herself.

The
mortgage
was
for
nearly
100%
of
the
purchase
price
($44,800.00),
so
it
is
easily

proven
that
“the
$25000.00
she
had
put
down
on
her
home”
was
a
blatant
lie
by
both

my
wife
and
her
attorney,
who
knew
the
facts
and
even
has
a
degree
in
mathematics.

(Each
of
his
statements
to
fool
the
judge
about
money
matters
is
a
separate
count
of

Fraud.)
About
3
years
after
we
were
married,
we
paid
off
the
first
home
with
her

settlement
check
for
her
“injury”
of
about
$23000.00
and
about
$20000.00
that
I
had

saved
up.
She
inherited
about
$10000.00
from
her
parents,
but
claimed
$18000.00.
All

of
these
frauds
were
done
with
an
eye
on
obtaining
the
current
paid
off
home.)




(My
wife
and
her
attorney
made
no
mention
of
(or
avoided)
the
facts
that
I
built
the

home
and
a
home­based
business
on
the
property,
that
I
had
paid
off
the
home
and

had
semi­retired,
or
that
my
business
was
headquartered
on
the
property
with
a
1250

SF
shop,
two
offices,
and
a
storage
shed
under
construction.
The
judge
didn’t
give
any

weight
at
all
to
these
facts,
or
to
the
facts
that
my
construction
tools
and
necessary

work
equipment
were
still
being
held
at
the
property,
or
to
the
fact
that
my
wife
had

agreed
just
before
she
filed
for
her
divorce
that
she
would
move
“in
the
best
interests
of

the
kids”
so
I
could
continue
with
my
business
plans,
or
to
the
obvious
facts
that
in

preparation
for
my
new
business
of
making
log
products
I
had
stockpiled
and
draw­
knifed
hundreds
of
logs,
that
the
27­acre
property
had
1000s
of
trees
to
sustain
the

business
indefinitely,
and
that
the
business
could
not
be
operated
anywhere
else.)







(This
fraud
regarding
my
contractor
business
was
also
very
obvious,
and
the
judge

knew
that
the
only
assets
the
business
had
were
its
computer
and
office
equipment,

which
were
still
being
held
hostage
at
the
property
by
my
wife
during
the
final
divorce

hearings.
The
previous
perjury
in
sworn
court
documents
about
$20,000.00
deposited

in
my
brothers
account
on
the
day
he
died,
changed
to
$15,000.00,
which
the
divorce

judge
knew
to
be
a
blatant
lie.
The
judge
also
didn’t
require
adequate
proof
(i.e.

cancelled
checks),
and
despite
the
known
fraud,
ordered
me
to
pay
my
wife
$12,500.00

for
money
that
she
claimed
I
hid
in
my
brother’s
account.)





 2


(Our
children
received
approximately
50
(of
the
4300+)
Beanie
Babies
from
their

grandmother
and
aunt.
The
rest
had
been
purchased
with
marital
funds,
stockpiled
for

a
“business”
my
wife
said
she
was
starting,
packed
neatly
in
71
boxes
with
“tag

protectors”,
and
mixed
in
with
other
stored
boxes
in
the
nooks
and
crannies
of
the

house
and
under
the
stairs
and
in
the
garage.
My
wife’s
sisters
were
very
much
a
part

of
this
fraud
too
and,
in
fact,
had
known
about
and
had
encouraged
and
helped
my

wife
in
her
plans
to
divorce
me
since
early
in
our
marriage.)




(The
greed
was
unreal.
She
filed
for
divorce
against
my
wishes
and
the
wishes
of
our

children.
And,
she
testified
twice
under
oath
that
her
attorney
had
“graciously”
waived

all
his
fees
for
her,
because
he
is
an
‘outstanding
Christian’
in
our
mutual
Catholic

Church.
But
still,
in
addition
to
everything
else,
the
judge
awarded
her
$12,000.00
in

attorney’s
fees
also.)




(I
never
heard
or
read
a
word
about
“alternative
dispute
resolution”
during
the

divorce,
but
found
out
after
that
it
is
required
by
law
to
be
available
as
an
alternative

to
litigation.)




(The
temporary
order
about
me
paying
my
wife’s
utility
bills,
etc.,
was
obtained
by

fraud.
Here,
my
wife’s
attorney
lies
again
to
make
it
appear
that
my
wife
is
financially

hard
pressed,
knowing
full
well
that
she
wasn’t.)




(Another
fraud
using
my
dead
brother:
My
wife
and
her
attorney
didn’t
prove
this

either;
they
just
submitted
copies
of
my
brother’s
back
statements,
pointed
out
a
few

large
deposits,
and
verbally
claimed
that
the
money
came
from
me.
The
judge
found

out
all
about
this
fraud
in
the
final
hearings
and
knew
that
the
bank
statements
were

inadmissible
and
that
only
cancelled
checks
can
prove
a
claim
like
this,
but
ordered
me

to
pay
my
wife
an
additional
$12,500.00
anyway.)





 3