The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.
Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by tom_nudd, 2018-10-09 06:26:22

FTSE100-single pages- mock up

FTSE100-single pages- mock up

Contents

1 Introduction from Soma Analytics
3 Foreword
7 Executive Summary
9 Section 1: Assessment Methodology
11 Section 2: Research Findings
19 Appendix A: FTSE 100 Companies

soma
analytics

Introduction from
Soma Analytics

Over the last 10 years mental health related absence
in the UK has increased continuously while at the
same time productivity per employee has decreased.
This highlights a widening gap between the market’s
productivity expectations and the mental health of a
company’s employees. The objective of this second
FTSE 100 report is to investigate which companies
are managing this gap well and help employees
thrive and which companies are struggling with
current market expectations.

Following the same methodology from last year’s
successful inaugural report we have seen a large
shift towards more reporting in mental health and
wellbeing. However, this shift did not happen across
all the FTSE 100 companies equally. Most of the
companies who were not reporting on it last year
continued to not report this year. The board rooms in
this country need to turn their attention to this blind
spot and start actively investing and reporting in their
staff’s mental health in order to stay competitive.

When we set out with the inaugural report last
year, our longer-term goal was to set the scene
for rethinking corporate reporting with regards to
employee mental health and wellbeing. We feel that
the sentiment in this country towards mental ill health
in the workplace has dramatically evolved and is now
a priority on the highest levels of the government.
The UK Government’s Stevenson Farmer report
or the increasing public awareness of the Heads
Together campaign are just two examples out of a
country-wide movement that we feel is necessary to
promote change.

soma 1
analytics

At Soma we are actively contributing to this
movement. Not only has Soma published this report
but also executed the largest ever randomised
controlled trial of digital stress interventions in
the workplace. In this study we worked with six
companies across three European countries and
almost 1,000 employees participated. Soma will
launch the groundbreaking results later this year.
I personally hope that more companies are inspired
by this evidence and join the movement towards
focussing on employee’s mental health in order to
create healthier workplaces of the future together!

Johann Huber
Co-Founder and CEO, Soma Analytics

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 2

soma Foreword
analytics
Four years ago, when speaking about employee
mental health to fellow HR leaders, health and safety
executives, CEOs and board members in the UK and
around the world the question was primarily “Why
must we invest”. Today, the conversations have
turned from “why” to “what should we be doing.

This report shows that more and more organisations
report on mental health and wellbeing of their staff
and that the awareness in leadership circles and
boardrooms is increasing. We have come far in the
last four years yet there is still some way to go.

Over the years we have made significant progress in
creating safe workplaces for employees, by ensuring
safety is integrated into all aspects of a person’s
day at work through it being embedded in systems,
processes, policies, leadership behaviour. However,
to this date too many organisations are still seeing
an investment in mental health and wellbeing as “the
fruit basket in the reception” and the participation in
a mental health week. Those isolated activities need
to be executed through a strategic performance
enhancing framework and underpinned by a modern
mental health policies in order to promote the
change that’s required.

Healthy, energised people lead to more engaged
employees, more engaged employees can “move
mountains” and therefore enhance the performance
of the business. We all know the power “energy” has
in enhancing performance. Initiatives like this report
are an excellent way of holding organisations and
individuals accountable for their staff’s wellbeing,
move wellbeing from a ‘nice to have’, and often
standalone initiative, to a strategic enabler that
will enhance the performance of an organisation.
Leadership behaviours and the supporting
organisational infrastructure will be critical in these
endeavours.

3

I am looking forward to the next four years with
hope that we will not only answer the question “what
should we be doing” but also have succeeded in
making mental health and wellbeing a strategic
priority that directly contributes to the performance
organisations around the world.

Geoff McDonald
Global Mental health campaigner and consultant
Co-Founder Minds @ Work
Former Global VP HR Unilever

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 4

“ We worked with Mental Health UK to develop and deliver mental
health awareness training to over 28,000 colleagues and we
estimate that more than 25 per cent of colleagues discussed
mental health this year. This included our Group Chief Executive
António Horta-Osório, who shared his story about executive
stress. We have improved the mental health support colleagues
receive through our third-party healthcare suppliers and are
supporting our top 120 leaders to develop their mental resilience.

Annual Report and Accounts 2017 LLoyds Banking Group, Page 22



soma 5
analytics

“ Our goal is for our employees to be emotionally, mentally and
physically fit, resilient to change and performing at their best.
We achieve this by working to deliver a proactive, integrated
and consistent plan of activities to support our commitment
to our employees’ physical and mental health and wellbeing
at work. In May 2017 we launched ‘Talking About Mental
Health – It’s Not A Red Card Offence’ – a new campaign using
the power of sport to help lift the mental health taboo and
encourage more conversations in the workplace about mental
health.

Strategic Report, Legal & General Group PLC, Annual Report and “
Accounts 2017, Page 34

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 6

soma Executive Summary
analytics
With this 2018 FTSE 100 Mental Health and
Wellbeing report we have replicated last years study
confirming its results: a statistically significant link
between the reporting of employee mental health
and wellbeing and corporate earnings. Despite a very
strong general economy companies that addressed
mental health and wellbeing in their 2017 reports still
showed up to two times more profit.

The hypothesis behind this report is that the more
a company holds itself publicly accountable for the
mental health wellbeing of its employees the more
this company will invest. This investment could then
lead to more productive and engaged employees,
with less days off work, ultimately leading to better
financial returns.

In order to compile this report, researchers at Soma
Analytics analysed the more than 22,000 pages
of the 2017/2018 annual reports of all FTSE 100
companies. A semantic ( or ‘word count’) analysis
was used to determine the frequency of terms such
as ‘wellbeing’ and ‘mental health’. The results of the
semantic analysis have then been combined together
with data on company size, industry, revenue
and Glassdoor rating. Those outcomes were also
compared with the results of last year’s report to see
the changes over time. Further, Soma’s researchers
also conducted a correlation analysis to determine
the relationship between the frequency of mental
health and wellbeing appearing in a report and the
FTSE 100 company’s profitability.

This years findings show a clear increase in
mental health and wellbeing reporting of FTSE 100
companies. The average mentions of ‘mental health’
in annual reports almost doubled from below one
in 2017 to over 1.3 mentions per report in 2018.
Overall, the industries that report most on mental
health are Finance, Insurance & Real Estate as
well as Utilities. Media, Manufacturing and Retail &
Consumer Goods are the industries that consistently
mention mental health and wellbeing the least in
their annual reports. Special mention should go to
the Construction industry. While in 2017 they did not

7

mention ‘mental health’ at all, this year’s average
count increased to 0.6 ‘mental health’ mentions per
report. Which places the construction industry on
the 5th place of 10 industries.

This years report also re-confirms last year’s findings
of a statistically significant positive correlation
between mentions of mental health and wellbeing
and a company’s earnings before taxes. The top half
of companies reporting most on mental health and
wellbeing made double the profit than the bottom
half. Even though not conclusive alone, all these
indicators combined can support the hypothesis that
the more a company reports about the wellbeing
and mental health of their employees, the better their
financial results.

About Soma

Soma Analytics is a UK and Germany based health-tech company.
With it’s Artificial Intelligence-driven Kelaa smartphone app
and employee dashboard it is the “smart way to beat stress at
work”. Soma helps companies worldwide to have a happier and
more engaged workforce and lower the cost of stress-related
absenteeism, mental-ill health and loss of productivity.

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 8

Section 1: Assessment
Methodology

Traditionally, sentiment analysis has been used to
analyse written documents, including the annual
reports of public companies, to understand if the
general tone of a document is positive or negative.
Sentiment analysis has also been used by financial
analysts to interpret annual reports to better
understand the outlook that the company gives. For
this purpose, special “sentiment word lists” exist which
can be used to undertake such analysis (Loughran and
McDonald word lists).

In this report we have chosen a similar sentiment
analysis approach, however, instead of sentiment word
lists we have chosen words that identify wellbeing, and
especially mental wellbeing. We focus on the words
“wellbeing” and “mental health” and their derivations
(i.e. wellbeing, well-being, well being).

This report differs to classical sentiment analysis where
researchers differentiate between positive and negative
sentiment. We do not focus on the connotation of the
words. We are indifferent as to whether mental health
is mentioned in a positive or negative way. The key idea
of this report is to measure how much public attention
FTSE 100 companies pay to mental health and
wellbeing - not if they mention it positively or negatively.

Other than in the USA, where annual reports are
comparable in structure based on the 10-k form, UK
companies have more freedom on what, where, and
how much information they disclose on topics such as
risk, strategy, performance, etc. This provides further
support for a sentiment analysis as companies can
choose what they focus on and what is mentioned. It
is therefore clearer how much they focus on the health
of their “biggest asset” - their employee. However, it
also brought challenges since many different annual
report document formats had to be brought into a into
a machine readable format to perform the analysis.
Finally, we wanted to re-test if the hypothesis we
confirmed last year that healthier employees are
more productive employees still holds true today with
data of an additional year. Therefore, we correlated

soma 9
analytics

wellbeing mentions with companies earnings before
interest and tax (EBIT). Our initial thinking was that the
more a company holds itself publicly accountable for
the wellbeing of their employees the more they invest
in it. This could lead to more productive employees,
with less days off work, and more engagement with
their companies, ultimately leading to better financial
returns. The regression model that was used is by no
means perfect and has several flaws. For example,
correlation versus causation. Correlation only shows
that when mental health and wellbeing mentions
increase also profits increase. However this does not
necessarily mean that mental health mentions cause
the increase in profit.

A full list of the FTSE 100 companies included in
this study, along with their sector classifications and
individual results is shown in the Appendix, page 19.

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 10

Section 2: Research Findings

Figure 1: FTSE 100 companies by employee headcount
According to the 100 annual reports analysed, the FTSE 100 companies employ
more than 5.7 million employees worldwide. The number of people employed by
each FTSE 100 company ranges from 0 employees, at the Scottish Mortgage
Investment Trust, to 585,000 employees, at G4S.

2018

Figure 1

Figure 2: FTSE 100 Average wellbeing mentions by year

This graph clearly shows the trend towards more awareness for mental health and
wellbeing in the FTSE 100. On average each company mentioned ‘Wellbeing’ 3.35
times last year but 4.87 times this year which is an increase of 45%. At the same
time each company mentioned ‘mental health’ less than one time last year (0.71)
but 1.31 times this year which is an increase by 85%.

2017
2018

soma Figure 2
analytics

Figure 3: FTSE 100 wellbeing mentions by year
Compared to last year more than a third of the FTSE 100 companies mention
‘wellbeing’ at least five times which is up from a quarter last year. Also the number of
companies not mentioning ‘wellbeing’ at all shrank from 32 down to 19.

2017
2018

Figure 3



...We are committed to doing even more in support of mental health
awareness...

Peter Long, Chairman Royal Mail PLC
Chairman’s Statement, Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018 Royal Mail PLC,

Page 6



Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 112

Figure 4: FTSE 100 average wellbeing mentions by industry and year

Average ‘wellbeing’ mentions were highest within the Construction (10.2) and Utility
industry(8.1). The Media (3.1), and Travel & Leisure industry(1.1) ranks lowest.
With exception of the Travel & Leisure and Manufacturing, all other industries have
increased their mentions compared to last year. Construction rose from second
to last place last year with only 2 mentions to first place this year with over ten
mentions.

2017
2018

Figure 4

Figure 5: FTSE 100 mental health mentions by year
The number of FTSE 100 companies not mentioning ‘mental health’ at all in their
report decreased by 10 companies from 74 in 2017 to 64 in 2018.

2017
2018

soma Figure 5
analytics

Figure 6: FTSE 100 average mental health mentions by industry and year
Average ‘mental health’ mentions are highest within the Finance, Insurance & Real
Estate (3.2) and Utilities (3) sector. It remains that seven of the 10 sectors mention
‘mental health’ less than once on average. Special focus on the Construction
industry which did not mention ‘mental health’ at all last year now mentions ‘mental
health’ on average 0.6 times per report.

2017
2018

Figure 6



Mental health is still our biggest focus. We endorse all the UK Government’s
Stevenson/Farmer review. Prevention is key.

Strategic Report, BT Group PLC, Annual Report 2018, Page 46



Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 114

Figure 7: FTSE 100 Glass door ranking by year

Glassdoor ratings, provided by the Glassdoor online portal where employees can
anonymously rate their employer from 0 (worst) to 5 (best), remain largely stable with
the average Glassdoor rating slightly increasing to 3.4 from 3.3 last year. However,
the companies who were rated 4.0 or better doubled from 8 to 16. At the same
time the number of companies rated 3.0 or lower halved from 20 last year to 10
companies this year.

2017
2018

Figure 7

FTSE 100 sectors by Glass door ranking by year
The employees of the FTSE 100 Finance, Insurance & Real Estate as well as
Construction Industry gave their employers the highest average Glassdoor rating of
3.62 and 3.58 respectively. The Services Industry employees rated their employers
lowest at 3.13.

2017
2018

soma Figure 8
analytics

“ We launched a five-year mental health strategy, “Because Healthy Minds Matter”.
It aims to increase awareness of mental health issues; reduce the associated
stigma; and provide tools and guidance to help colleagues and their loved ones “
in times of need.

Strategic Report, Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018 Royal Mail PLC, Page 49

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 116

soma Statistical analysis of
analytics the effects of investment
in mental health and
wellbeing on profits

In this years statistical analysis we wanted to
investigate whether last year’s results could be
replicated and whether the general hypothesis that
a company’s performance is linked with employee
mental health also holds true with the next set of
annual reports. Therefore we have applied two
statistical test:

• the analysis of variance test (balanced single
factor ANOVA) exactly as last year

• the Wilcoxon rank-sum test which is new for this
year.

As last year, we have combined the number of
mental health and wellbeing mentions and examined
whether a meaningful relationship between the
numbers of mentions (independent variable) and
the company’s profits before taxes (dependent
variable) exists and if this relationship is statistically
significant.

For the analysis we split the companies into two
groups: companies that mentioned the words
“mental health” or “wellbeing” three times or
less (54 companies) and more than three times
(46 companies). The cut-off value of two groups
represents the median number of mentions and
allows for a relatively even split.

Results

With the generally very favourable climate the
FTSE 100 Index has hit several all-time-highs in the
last 12 months and its constituents have posted
record profits in 2018 producing several outliers.
For example, there were two companies posting
higher profits than they posted revenues. Those
outliers also played a significant factor in the ANOVA
analysis, skewing the mean values of the two groups

17

such that the group with the low mentions had a 18
(statistically insignificant) lower mean profit (£2.196
billion) than the group with the high number of
mentions (£2.317 billion).

In order to control for those outliers we picked
the Wilcoxon text which is more robust in those
scenarios. Applying the Wilcoxon test to the median
profit, shows a clearer, less outlier-sensitive picture:
median profits were more than twice as large for
the high group at £1.568 billion compared to the
low group at £680 million. Testing those results for
statistical significance, essentially whether they are
produced by random variation or not, shows that this
year’s results are even more significant (p < 0.02),
or less likely to be purely random, than last year’s
(p=0.03).

We assume that the underlying mechanism how
profit and mental health and wellbeing reporting
could be linked is that healthier employees may be
more productive and if a company sees value in their
employee’s mental health they are more likely to
invest and if they invest they are more likely to report
about it in their annual report.

These results should not be understood as a “proven
causal link” between investment in mental health and
corporate profits as there are many market influences
on a company’s financial performance. It is beyond
the reach of this analysis to control for each variable
such as changing standards in financial reporting,
currency fluctuations and changing interest rates.

Taking into consideration the limitations discussed
previously the results of this report reconfirm
last years results and strengthen the relationship
between mental health and wellbeing mentions and
corporate performance. We see them as an indicator
that companies who are not yet investing in their
staff’s mental health should definitely consider this as
an worthwhile investment paying off on an economic
level by increasing a companies profit but also on a
social level by increasing employees overall health
and wellbeing.

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018

Company Sector Revenue (£m) Income before Full Time Mental Wellbeing Glassdoor
health Mentions Rating 2018
3i Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate in reporting taxes (£m) in Employees Mentions
Admiral Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate (24Sep2018)
Anglo American Mining, Oil & Gas period Reporing period 2018
Antofagasta Mining, Oil & Gas
Ashtead Group Services 1,574 1,488 244 00 4
Associated British Foods Manufacturing 1,129 404 9,696 01 3.6
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals 26,243 69,000 03 3.6
Aviva Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4,749 5,505 6,200 05 3.7
BAE Systems Manufacturing 3,706 1,831 16,318 10 n/a
Barclays Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 15,357 133,000 0 10 4.2
Barratt Developments Construction 22,465 862 61,100 29 3.8
BERKELEY Group Holdings Construction 35,141 1,576 30,021 2 16 3.4
BHP Billiton Mining, Oil & Gas 18,322 2,227 83,900 04 3.6
BP Mining, Oil & Gas 18,927 2,374 79,900 95 3.7
British American Tobacco Retail & Consumer Goods 4,875 1,134 6,193 02 3.6
British Land Company Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2,704 3,541 2,689 4 44 2.4
BT Group Utilities 43,885 26,146 23 3.7
Bunzl Services 238,802 836 69,700 00 3.4
Burberry Group Retail & Consumer Goods 20,292 935 60,593 03 3.9
Carnival Travel & Leisure 14,751 03 4.1
Centrica Utilities 741 7,180 835 26 3.4
Coca-Cola HBC AG (CDI) Retail & Consumer Goods 23,723 29,591 105,800 11
Compass Group Services 501 08 3
CRH Construction 8,581 2,616 18,154 00 3.4
Croda International Manufacturing 2,733 409 10,135 07 3.4
DCC Services 17,510 413 99,200 0 30 3.3
Diageo Retail & Consumer Goods 28,023 2,666 31,939 2 16 3.9
Direct Line Insurance Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 6,522 142 28,957 00 3.3
easyJet Travel & Leisure 22,568 565 550,000 00 3.5
Evraz Mining, Oil & Gas 22,410 1,560 85,000 02 3.6
Experian Services 1,373 1,659 04 2.2
Ferguson Retail & Consumer Goods 14,265 314 4,309 12 3.7
Fresnillo Mining, Oil & Gas 12,163 260 11,146 00 3.8
GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals 3,490 3,740 29,362 00 4.2
Glencore Mining, Oil & Gas 5,047 539 10,808 01 3.1
GVC Holdings Travel & Leisure 7,791 385 12,280 01 3.6
HALMA Services 4,662 855 70,186 09 3.4
Hargreaves Lansdown Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 15,224 994 16,500 02
HSBC Holdings Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2,093 1,180 33,000 08 4
Imperial Brands Retail & Consumer Goods 30,186 741 00 3.8
Informa Media 205,476 3,525 4,988 14 3.4
InterContinental Hotels Group Travel & Leisure 6,921 98,462 11 3.8
International Consolidated 896 -26 146,000 02 3.4
Airlines Group SA (CDI) Travel & Leisure 1,076 172 28,000 12 3.6
Intertek Group 292 00 3.6
ITV Services 448 17,167 6,341 00 3.3
Johnson Matthey Media 49,628 1,861 1,499 3.2
Just Eat Manufacturing 15,280 269 229,195 3.9
Kingfisher Retail & Consumer Goods 678 33,800
Land Securities Group Retail & Consumer Goods 1,758 7,539
Legal & General Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1,784 6,658
Lloyds Banking Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
London Stock Exchange Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 22,972 2,493 63,517 1 1 2.3
Marks & Spencer Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
Melrose Industries Retail & Consumer Goods 2,769 439 43,000 0 1 2.6
Micro Focus International Manufacturing 3,132 4.1
Mondi Services 14,122 500 6,055 0 1 2.9
Morrison (Wm) Supermarkets Manufacturing 4.2
National Grid Retail & Consumer Goods 546 320 12,348 3 7 3.1
Next Utilities 11,655 4.4
NMC HEALTH Retail & Consumer Goods -76 2,919 0 1 3.1
OCADO Manufacturing 852 3.6
Retail & Consumer Goods 10,622 682 78,000 0 1 3.2
Paddy Power Betfair 17,741 3.5
Pearson Travel & Leisure -251 615 6 18 n/a
Persimmon Media 1,768 2.9
Prudential Construction 10,698 2,061 7,629 11 12
Randgold Resources Ltd. Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3
Reckitt Benckiser Group Mining, Oil & Gas 2,092 5,625 67,905 25 8 3
Relx plc Retail & Consumer Goods 3,209 3.1
Rentokil Initial Media 7,096 564 4,908 0 5 4
RIGHTMOVE Services 17,262 3.4
Rio Tinto Media 15,250 67 80,787 2 1 3.4
Rolls-Royce Holdings Mining, Oil & Gas 4,056
Royal Bank of Scotland Group Manufacturing 1,603 -28 11,351 0 1 3.3
Royal Dutch Shell (A+B Shares) Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1,464 3.1
Mining, Oil & Gas 77 14,800 0 0
Royal Mail 1,745 4
RSA Insurance Group Services 4,513 887 25,800 0 3 3.3
Sage Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3,422 3.5
Sainsbury (J) Services 86,562 380 105,487 1 0 3.4
Schroders Retail & Consumer Goods 1,285 3.5
Scottish Mortgage Inv Trust Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 11,512 2,708 23,023 5 6 4.1
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 7,355 4.1
SEGRO 2,412 726 28,318 0 0 3.4
Severn Trent Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.8
Shire Plc Utilities 243 210 13,739 0 2 3.6
Sky Pharmaceuticals 40,030 3.9
Smith & Nephew Media 16,307 1 12,799 0 4
Smith DS Manufacturing 12,661 3.3
Smiths Group Manufacturing 305,179 247 7,640 35 2.9
Smurfit Kappa Group Manufacturing 2.9
SSE Manufacturing 10,172 421 32,500 0 2
St James's Place Utilities 7,101 3
Standard Chartered Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1,715 966 4,713 0 5 3.7
Standard Life Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
Taylor Wimpey Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 28,456 3,970 22,912 2 4 3
Construction 2,512
Tesco 1,234 481 4,003 0 3 4
Retail & Consumer Goods 3.8
TUI AG Reg Shs (DI) 334 2,499 40,000 0 18 2.7
Unilever Travel & Leisure 1,694 3.5
United Utilities Group Retail & Consumer Goods 15,161 1,734 30,000 1 10
Vodafone Group Utilities 13,585 3
Whitbread Utilities 4,765 714 36,000 0 6 3.2
WPP Travel & Leisure 5,765 3.6
Media 3,280 178 520 0 0 3.7
8,562 2.8
31,226 12,816 46,807 4 8 4.4
9,083 3.6
13,063 4,897 50,000 1 2 3.5
7,613 4.4
3,965 2,239 70,000 10 18
213.5
56,818 18,130 84,000 0 1
3.3
18,535 212 161,851 14 7 4
53,715
448 11,953 1 2 3.5
1,736 3.7
46,571 342 13,292 0 1 3.2
3.3
3,295 409 121,200 0 0
15,265
760 4,619 3 5

1,211 n/a 0 1

976 279 0 0

302 6,256 12 16

1,896 23,044 1 3

864 31,578 0 1

879 15,000 0 2

292 28,500 0 3

601 22,000 1 3

576 46,000 0 4

1,086 20,786 3 4

342 2,155 2 9

2,415 82,838 0 4

2,088 9,651 6 8

682 5,239 0 0

1,298 440,658 1 2

1,080 66,632 0 0

8,153 160,566 0 15

432 5,347 3 14

3,878 95,049 0 4

548 50,000 0 3

2,109 134,413 1 8

Randgold Resources Ltd. Mining, Oil & Gas 1,285 481 4,003 0 3 3.5
Reckitt Benckiser Group Retail & Consumer Goods 11,512 3.4
Relx plc Media 2,499 40,000 0 18 3.5
Rentokil Initial Services 7,355 4.1
RIGHTMOVE Media 2,412 1,734 30,000 1 10 4.1
Rio Tinto Mining, Oil & Gas 3.4
Rolls-Royce Holdings Manufacturing 243 714 36,000 0 6 3.8
Royal Bank of Scotland Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 40,030 3.6
Royal Dutch Shell (A+B Shares) Mining, Oil & Gas 16,307 178 520 0 0 3.9
12,661
Royal Mail Services 305,179 12,816 46,807 4 8 3.3
RSA Insurance Group Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.9
Sage Group Services 10,172 4,897 50,000 1 2 2.9
Sainsbury (J) Retail & Consumer Goods 7,101
Schroders Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1,715 2,239 70,000 10 18 3
Scottish Mortgage Inv Trust Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.7
28,456 18,130 84,000 0 1
SEGRO Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2,512 3
Severn Trent Utilities 1,234 212 161,851 14 7
Shire Plc Pharmaceuticals 4
Sky Media 334 448 11,953 1 2 3.8
Smith & Nephew Manufacturing 1,694 2.7
Smith DS Manufacturing 15,161 342 13,292 0 1 3.5
Smiths Group Manufacturing 13,585
Smurfit Kappa Group Manufacturing 4,765 409 121,200 0 0 3
SSE Utilities 5,765 3.2
St James's Place Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3,280 760 4,619 3 5 3.6
Standard Chartered Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 8,562 3.7
Standard Life Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 31,226 1,211 n/a 0 1 2.8
Taylor Wimpey Construction 9,083 4.4
13,063 976 279 0 0 3.6
Tesco Retail & Consumer Goods 7,613 3.5
3,965 302 6,256 12 16 4.4
TUI AG Reg Shs (DI) Travel & Leisure
Unilever Retail & Consumer Goods 56,818 1,896 23,044 1 3 3.5
United Utilities Group Utilities
Vodafone Group Utilities 18,535 864 31,578 0 1 3.3
Whitbread Travel & Leisure 53,715 4
WPP Media 879 15,000 0 2
1,736 3.5
46,571 292 28,500 0 3 3.7
3.2
3,295 601 22,000 1 3 3.3
15,265
576 46,000 0 4

1,086 20,786 3 4

342 2,155 2 9

2,415 82,838 0 4

2,088 9,651 6 8

682 5,239 0 0

1,298 440,658 1 2

1,080 66,632 0 0

8,153 160,566 0 15

432 5,347 3 14

3,878 95,049 0 4

548 50,000 0 3

2,109 134,413 1 8

Appendix: List of FTSE 100
Companies with their results.

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 20

soma The European Union’s
analytics Horizon 2020 Wellbeing
Project

Primer on the Results of The First
Large Scale Trial into Reducing
Workplace Stress Using a
Smartphone.

What is Horizon 2020?

By coupling research and innovation, Horizon
2020 provides an emphasis on science, industrial
leadership and tackling societal challenges.

The EU has awarded Soma Analytics the
responsibility of conducting the largest study of its
kind, looking at reducing stress in the workplace via
a smartphone application.

What did the study do?

In this study Soma had six organisations from
three European countries participating with nearly
1,000 employees. The study was set up after the
‘‘gold standard’ for clinical studies: a randomised
controlled trial whereby half the participants received
the “treatment” (the Kelaa app) and the other half
received a the “treatment” only at a later date
(waiting list control group).

Why is this research important?

This 2018 FTSE 100 report shows that investing
in the mental health and wellbeing of employees
could lead to increased productivity and corporate
earnings. However, the question however remains
as to where investment should be focused on in
order to maximise employee health and wellbeing.
At Soma Analytics we use science-backed and
evidence-based solutions to show that digital
interventions such as the Kelaa Smartphone App
administered in the right way are the ideal tool for
companies to create a happier, healthier and more
engaged workforce.

21

When are the results ready?
The collection of the data has finished in August
2018 and Soma’s scientists are currently finishing the
analysis. Preliminary results already indicate some
groundbreaking findings. The official results will be
shared publicly in the last quarter of 2018 .
If you want to be among the first to receive the
results of our study or more information about Soma
you can sign up here:
www.soma-analytics.com/h2020results/

This project has received funding from the European
Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
programme under the grant agreement № 725832.

Mental Health and Wellbeing FTSE 100 Report 2018 22

About Soma Analytics

Soma Analytics is a UK and Germany based health-tech company.
With it’s Artificial Intelligence-driven Kelaa smartphone app
and employee dashboard it is the “smart way to beat stress at
work”. Soma helps companies worldwide to have a happier and
more engaged workforce and lower the cost of stress-related
absenteeism, mental-ill health and loss of productivity.

@SomaAnalytics Soma Analyticsw ww.soma-analytics.com

soma This project has received funding from the European
analytics Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
programme under the grant agreement № 725832.


Click to View FlipBook Version