9/10/2010
Using Continuous
Monitoring Tools as Part
of a Fraud Detection
Program
“Fraud and falsehood only dread examination.
Truth invites it.” - Thomas Cooper
Overview
The Problem
Fraud Program Overview
Integrity Checks
Results
Next Steps and Future Vision
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
1
9/10/2010
Fraud
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Fraud Statistics 2008 - 2009
- Median loss $160,000
- 25% of nearly 2,000 cases involved a loss of $1 million or more
- Median time before discovery: 18 months
- 80% of fraud perpetrators have no previous fraud convictions
- Internal Audit detected 14% of corporate fraud
Source: Association of Certified Fraud Examiners 2010 “Report to the
Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse”
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
2
9/10/2010
Impetus For Emory’s Fraud Program
- Over $2 million stolen
- 6 former employees serving jail time (6 months to 7 years)
- Termination of numerous employees
- Significant internal resources diverted to investigations
Top 10 Recent Frauds
1. In town lunches 6. Ghost Employees
2. Personal Travel 7. Set up relative as vendor
3. Conflict of Interest/ 8. SSN Theft
Payments to Not For Profit
9. IPod Lady
4. Oxygen tank sales
10. Former Employee
5. Bonus payments Transactions
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
3
9/10/2010
Contributing Factors
Control Weaknesses:
– Authorization and Approval
– Segregation of Duties
– Monitoring
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Emory Fraud Awareness, Prevention and Detection Program
September 1, 2009 to October 1, 2009 to December 1, 2009 to March 1, 2010 to
October 31, 2009 January 31, 2009 August 31, 2010 August 31, 2010
Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV
Fraud Awareness Fraud Detection School and Transaction
Business Unit Audit Monitoring
and Detection Data Analysis
Planning
9Develop objective, scope, and 9Design test scripts. Validate exceptions (along Evaluate the population of
approach for program. with supporting test scripts used to support
9Obtain EU and EHC data documentation) at each audits.
9Perform preliminary fraud from FY 2009 and 2010 for School/business unit.
risk (scenarios) assessment. each transaction type. Work with EU and EHC
Perform additional management to
9Review and finalize fraud risk 9Run test scripts against investigative review as recommend selected scripts
(scenarios) assessment. data. required. * May require for implementation within
additional resources. their continuous
9Announce fraud program to 9Review results monitoring efforts.
Schools and selected business (exceptions). Identify internal control
units within review scope. enhancements and Develop the monitoring
9Select sample for follow- recommend improvements. test scripts for PeopleSoft.
9Meet with Emory leadership up with respective School
to discuss fraud awareness and or business unit. Report the results to Next Steps
and prevention. Emory leadership.
9Identify, select, and engage
vendor.
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results
4
9/10/2010
Continuous Monitoring Tools Considered
Enterprise system reporting
ACL
Continuous Monitoring Tools
ACL Audit Exchange
Oversight
Approva
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
We are leveraging a production-ready
Continuous Controls Monitoring Platform
Systems Knowledge Maintenance
of Interface
Record Extract Common Risk and Workflow
& Mapping Data Performance & Platform
Configuration
Rules Models Checks
Extract, Data Reasoning Workflow
Map & Locker & Analytics Engine
Load
Engine Platform
Data & Logs
The Platform
Visual
Reporting /
User
Interface
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
5
9/10/2010
Areas of Focus
Transaction Types Scenario’s
P‐Card • Inappropriate purchases
• Split transaction
Procurement & Payment
• Fictitious vendors
• Duplicate invoices
Travel • Split transactions
Payroll & Employee Benefits • Direct charge vendors (travel agency, Emory
Conference Center, etc)
• Patient refunds
• Submission of personal travel expenses
• Duplicate submission of expenses
• Supplemental Pay
• Ghost Employee
• Falsified hours/salary
• Ineligible dependents
• Failure to report PTO
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Visual Risk IQ brought
a defined, iterative process**
Brainstorm
Refine and Acquire and
Sustain Map Data
Analyze Write
and Report Queries
**© Visual Risk IQ, all rights reserved
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
6
9/10/2010
Results
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
P-Card Issues
Control design deficiencies Transactions
¾ Changes to purchase limits ¾ Splits
¾ Segregation of duties ¾ Failure to use POs
¾ Improper supervisor reviewing ¾ Gift card purchases
transactions ¾ Potential Fraud
¾ Rogue Websites
Automated System Controls
¾ Level 3 data overwriting Weekend/Holiday Transactions
¾ Card closure date not captured ¾ Near home
¾ Limited MCC restrictions ¾ Non-Exempt employees
¾ Approvals not used
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
7
9/10/2010
Primary Vendors: Sept 1, 2008 – Jan 31, 2010
•Phone/Wireless
•On-line retail (amazon, paypal)
•Food (grocery, pizza, etc)
•Airline
•Retail (wal-mart, target, home depo, etc)
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
P-Card Results
Employee Visits to Retail Establishments
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
5965 - Retail 5311 - Dept 5947 - Gift 5300 - Wrhse 5942- Book 5310 - Disc 5200 - Home 5411 -
Str Str Str Club Str Str Suppy Grocery
Store
On average, 21 employees purchase items from retail
establishments each day
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
8
9/10/2010
P2P Issues
Duplicate Vendors
Duplicate Invoices
Employee as Vendor
EPLS
Remit Name/Address Different than Vendor Master
Sign-on Bonus
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Success Factors/Lessons Learned
Incremental approach/time to complete
Importance of understanding the data and the business process
Data privacy/security concerns
Partner expertise
Reduce false positives
Management support and involvement
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
9
9/10/2010
Fraud Program Status
Milestone P‐Card P2P Project Phase Travel Payroll
Patient Refund
SOW Signed 9 9 9 9
Define Tests to be performed/ 9 9 9 9 9
Brainstorming Meeting 9
9 9
Acquire Data 9 9 99
Review Exception Reports – Pass 1 9 9 9
Review Exception Reports ‐ Pass 2 9 9 9
Audit Final Review of Exception 9 9 9
Reports 9
Select Sample Transactions 9
Testing Completed
Draft Report
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Future Vision
Development of “audit data warehouse”
Identify routines to be run and frequency
Establish process with management
Development of new integrity checks (new risks)
Need for Data Analyst/Continuous Monitoring Specialist
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
10
9/10/2010
Questions
For more information – contact via email at: [email protected]
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Appendix: P-Card Integrity Checks
Cardholder File Records Duplicate Transactions
¾ Comparison to Employee Master ¾ Same merchant
¾ Unusual limits reference number
¾ Same amount
Transaction Limits
¾ Single purchase Unusual Purchases
¾ Monthly limit ¾ Weekend/Holiday
¾ MCC
Split Transactions ¾ Terminated employee
¾ Single cardholder ¾ Leave of absence
¾ Department ¾ Declined transactions
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
11
9/10/2010
Appendix: Procure to Pay Integrity Checks
Vendor Master Voucher/Invoice
¾ EPLS/OFAC ¾ Invoice line exceeds PO
¾ Duplicate ¾ Vendor credit timing
¾ Employee match ¾ Voucher to inactive vendor
¾ Missing information ¾Remit address override
Purchase Order Unusual Purchases
¾ PO to Inactive vendor ¾ Single employee vendors
¾ PO not completely invoiced ¾Weekend/Holiday
¾ MCC
Split/Duplicate Transactions
Patient Refunds
¾ Employee address
¾ Multiple payments
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Appendix: Travel Integrity Checks
Duplicate transactions Trips by non-active employees
¾ Travel card Change fees
¾ P-card
¾ Expense reimbursement
¾ Direct bill
Unusual trips
¾ Atlanta not destination or origination
¾ PO not completely invoiced
¾ Flight class
¾ Trips longer than 5 days (and over weekend or holiday)
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
12
9/10/2010
Appendix: Payroll Integrity Checks
Ghost employees/COI Kronos
¾ Missing employee master data ¾ Off site clock in/out
¾ Same address (as supervisor ¾ Clocks for LOA or term
or timekeeper) employees
¾ Same bank account # (as ¾ Timekeeper adjustments
supervisor or timekeeper)
¾ Invalid SSN Benefits
¾ No deductions ¾ Unlikely dependents (age)
¾ Comparison W2 dependents
Unusual payment to Medical Plan dependents
¾ Supplemental payments
¾ Above pay range Falsified Hours
¾ Excessive OT
¾ Shifts longer than 12 hours
¾ Inappropriate Shift diffs
¾ Immediate call back
¾ Limited vacation
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
Appendix: Payroll Integrity Checks
Ghost employees/COI Kronos
¾ Missing employee master data ¾ Off site clock in/out
¾ Same address (as supervisor ¾ Clocks for LOA or term
or timekeeper) employees
¾ Same bank account # (as ¾ Timekeeper adjustments
supervisor or timekeeper)
¾ Invalid SSN Benefits
¾ No deductions ¾ Unlikely dependents (age)
¾ Comparison W2 dependents
Unusual payment to Medical Plan dependents
¾ Supplemental payments
¾ Above pay range Falsified Hours
¾ Excessive OT
¾ Shifts longer than 12 hours
¾ Inappropriate Shift diffs
¾ Immediate call back
¾ Limited vacation
The Problem Fraud Program Overview Integrity Checks Results Next Steps
13