COMPUTER DEPARTMENT

Department of Computer Science ( 2018 – 2019)

ACTION PLAN TIMELINE FOR RESPONSIBILITY

IMPLEMENTATION

 To ensure smooth and April 15th Teachers
effective transition junior
school to senior school Ongoing Teachers
student by conducting more Ongoing Teachers
practical lessons. April 28th

 To conduct
activities(investigative)
which lead to critical
thinking.

 Giving high level thinking
questions in all worksheets
for toppers of class, so that
their skills can be further
raised.

 To update software as per
the syllabus for lab
practices

 To improve learning using Ongoing Teachers
buddy system.

 To develop coding skills in September 16th Teachers
students by giving them
software coding project Teachers
based on their grades.
Ongoing
 To help them in making
power point presentations June 5th Teachers

 To encourage the students
to take part in inter/intra
school competitions to
enhance their IT skills.

 To make accurate
assessments to match the
curriculum expectations.



TEACHERS TIME TABLE

SANJEEV KHATRI : HEAD OF DEPARTMENT

SHIFA: TEACHER

ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT AUDIT
COMPUTER

Staff:

• What is the staff student ratio?
30:1 Grade 1 to 8
10:1 Grade 9 to 12

• From which grade to which grade Computer is taught?
Grade 1 to 8 ICT
Grade 9 and 10 Computer Application
Grade 11 to 12 Computer Science

• Are the teachers who teach Computer adequately trained, qualified and
experienced?
Yes, As C.I.S.E. norms
Post graduates

• Are all the teachers trained to use the ICT tools available on the Promethean Smart
Board?

Yes, (Certified)

• Are Professional development workshops held regularly for your teachers?
Yes,

• Do all the teachers attend these workshops and update their knowledge?
Yes

• How do you monitor that all teachers in the Department adhere to set procedures?
Formal and Department meetings, appraisal, observations

Curriculum:

• Is the Computer syllabus vertically and horizontally integrated?
Yes, it is linked with all other subjects.

• Why is Computer made as a choice/optional subject at Grades 11 and Grade 12
level?
To cater to the interest and potential of students. To cope up of the 21st century
skill.

• Is the curriculum/subject meeting growing demands of 21st Century?
100%

• Are the changes made in the curriculum in the recent past?
Yes, to introduce the new practices in ICT.

• On what basis is the term wise and week wise syllabus break up done?
The term wise and week wise syllabus breakup is done with latest computer
skills in a systematic and step by step manner.

• Who monitors that all teachers in the Department adhere to the syllabus?
SLT’s

• What is the procedure to select text books?
As per the ICSE norms.

• Are students encouraged to use additional reference books for practice?
Yes, there are 105 reference books in school library. They also use web links.

• Do teachers use additional reference books while teaching?
Yes mainly online references.

• What evidence do you have of cross curricular links with other subjects?
Lesson plans.

Correction:

• How often are exercise books corrected by the teachers?
Weekly.

• How often does the HOD/SLT check these books?
Weekly

• How often is Homework set?
Twice in week for grade 9 and above.

• Do students finish their homework during Prep?
Yes, they do.

• Is peer correction encouraged?
Yes, in the text book exercises in primary.

• What follow up action is taken if homework/ class work is incomplete?
Reminders, deadlines if not completed they are asked to complete during prep
classes.

• What follow up action is taken for teachers who do not correct their books
regularly?
Meetings with teacher, Reminders, frequent checking.

Examination:

• How frequently are the formative tests done?
Continuous practical assessment.

• How many term examinations are conducted in one academic year?
Three summative exams.

• How is the setting of the question paper by teachers, allocated?
Phase wise.

• Are there any set guidelines given to teachers about setting of papers?
Yes.

• Are the exam question papers standardized to meet the requirements of all
students in the class?
Yes.

• Is Bloom’s taxonomy followed while making the marking scheme.?
Yes.

• How and when are the answer scripts moderated?
As per assessment department discretion.

Evaluation:

• What are the different tools/ways in which a student’s progress can be tracked?
Online assessment tools like Edmodo, Pallet & Kahoot.

• What follow up action is taken for a weak students/ high flyer?
Buddy system , differential exercises/ practical questions based on the levels.

• In what way are students made responsible for their own learning?
Critical thinking , investigative questioning , creativity, problem solving , decision
making , sequencing.

Documents required during the Audit:

1. Minutes of faculty meetings
2. Class allocation of all Computer teachers
3. Vertical and horizontal syllabus tracker

NA
4. List of text books used in the school

Next Gen grade 1 to 6 BY Ravi K Chug
e-book on scratch programming (compiled by computer teacher) for grade 7
e-book on visual basic programming (compiled by computer teacher) for grade 8
Computer Application (Java) by V. K Pandey & D.K. Dey grade 9 and 10
Computer Science (Java) by V. K Pandey & D.K. Dey grade11 and 12

5. List of websites/teaching resources used

6. Pupil tracker
NA

7. ELT analysis

8. Previous year’s grade wise average analysis

9. Sample lesson plans
Attached.

10. Sample class observation sheets by SLT/HOD/PEERS

11. Rubrics

12. Sample of Diagnostic remarks(if any)

13. Samples of assessment papers
Attached

14. Samples of term examination papers
Attached

15. Samples of assessments
Attached

16. Samples of marking scheme and blooms taxonomy.

TEXT BOOK LIST

GRADE BOKNAME
1 Online
2 Online
3 Online
4 Online
5 Online
6 e-book visual basic
7 e-book visual basic
8 e-book visual basic
9 Computer Applications by Vijay Kumar Pandey & Dilip Kumar Dey APC publications
10 Computer Applications by Vijay Kumar Pandey & Dilip Kumar Dey APC publications
11 Computer Science by Vijay Kumar Pandey & Dilip Kumar Dey APC publications
12 Computer Science by Vijay Kumar Pandey & Dilip Kumar Dey APC publications



RUBERICS: ICT SKILLS

1. Basic Computer Operation
___ Level 1 I do not use a computer.
___ Level 2 I use the computer to run a few specific, pre-loaded programs.
___ Level 3 I run two programs simultaneously, and have several windows open at the same time.
___ Level 4 I trouble-shoot successfully when basic problems with my computer or printer occur. I learn
new programs on my own. I teach others basic operations to my colleagues.
2. File Management
___ Level 1 I do not save any documents I create using the computer.
___ Level 2 I select, open and save documents on different drives.
___ Level 3 I create my own folders to keep my files organized and understand the importance of a back-
up system.
___ Level 4 I move files between folders and drives, and I maintain my network storage size within
acceptable limits. I teach my colleagues how to save and organize their files.
3. Word Processing
___ Level 1 I do not use a word processing program.
___ Level 2 I occasionally use a word processing program for simple documents. I generally find it easier
to hand write most written work I do.
___ Level 3 I use a word processing program for nearly all my written professional work: memos, tests,
worksheets, and home communication. I edit, spell-check, and change the format of a document
___ Level 4 I teach my colleagues to use word processing programs for their written communication.
4. Spreadsheet Use
___ Level 1 I do not use a spreadsheet.
___ Level 2 I understand the use of a spreadsheet and can navigate within one. I create simple
spreadsheets and charts.

1|Page

___ Level 3 I use spreadsheets for a variety of record-keeping tasks. I use labels, formulas, cell references
and formatting tools in my spreadsheets. I choose charts which best represent my data.
___ Level 4 I teach my colleagues to use spreadsheets to improve their own data keeping and analysis
skills.
5. Database Use
___ Level 1 I do not use a database.
___ Level 2 - I understand the use of a database and locate information from a pre-made database such as
Library Search.
___ Level 3 I create my own databases. I define the fields and choose a layout to organize information I
have gathered. I use my database to answer questions about my information.
___ Level 4 I teach my colleagues to create and use databases to organize and analyze data.
6. Graphics Use
___ Level 1 I do not use graphics in my word processing or presentations.

___ Level 2 I open, create, and place simple pictures into documents using drawing programs or clipart.
___ Level 3 I edit and create graphics, placing them into documents in order to help clarify or amplify my
message.
___ Level 4 I promote interpretation and display of visual data using a variety of tools and programs.
7. Internet Use
___ Level 1 I do not use the Internet.
___ Level 2 I access school and district websites to find information. I follow links from these sites to
various Internet resources.
___ Level 3 I use lists of Internet resources and make profitable use of Web search engines to explore
educational resources.
___ Level 4 I contribute to my company Web sites. I teach colleagues how to effectively use the resources
available on the Internet.
8. Telecommunications Use (E-Mail)
___ Level 1 I have an e-mail account but I rarely use it.

2|Page

___ Level 2 I send messages using e-mail - mostly to district colleagues, friends, and family. I check my e-
mail account on a regular basis and maintain my mail folders in an organized manner.
___ Level 3 I incorporate e-mail use into classroom activities. I use e-mail to access information from
outside sources.
___ Level 4 I involve colleagues in using e-mail to communicate with other workers and various kinds of
experts from other states and nations.
9. Ethical Use Understanding
___ Level 1 I am not aware of any ethical issues surrounding computer use.
___ Level 2 I know that some copyright restrictions apply to computer software.
___ Level 3 I understand district rules concerning student and adult use of e-mail and Internet. I know the
programs for which the district or my building holds a site license. I understand the school board policy on
the use of copyrighted materials.
___ Level 4 I model ethical usage of all software and let colleagues know my personal stand on this issue.
10. Information Searching
___ Level 1 I am unlikely to seek information when it is in electronic formats.
___ Level 2 I conduct simple searches with the electronic encyclopedia and library software for major
topics.
___ Level 3 I have learned how to use a variety of search strategies on several information programs,
including the use of Boolean (and, or, not) searches to help target the search.
___ Level 4 I have incorporated logical search strategies into my work with colleagues, showing them the
power of such searches with various electronic sources to locate information which relates to their
questions.
11. Video Production
___ Level 1 I do not use a video camera.
___ Level 2 I create original video tapes for home or school projects.
___ Level 3 I create original video tapes using editing equipment .
___ Level 4 I use computer programs to edit video tape presentations and I teach
Colleagues to create and edit video tapes.

3|Page

12. Presentation Skills
___ Level 1 I do not use computer presentation programs.
___ Level 2 I present my information to classes or groups in a single application program such as a word
processor, a spreadsheet, or a publishing program.

___ Level 3 I present my information and and use presentation programs such as Powerpoint or
SuperLink, incorporating various multimedia elements such as sound, video clips, and graphics .
___ Level 4 I teach my colleagues how to use presentation software. I facilitate my students’ use of a
variety of applications to persuasively present their research concerning a problem or area of focus in
their learning.
13. Technology Integration
___ Level 1 I do not blend the use of computer-based technologies into my classroom learning activities.
___ Level 2 I understand the district technology plan supports integration of technology into classroom
activities, but I am still learning about what strategies will work and how to do it. I accept reports
produced electronically, but do not require it.
___ Level 3 From time to time, I encourage colleagues to employ computer-based technologies to support
the communicating, data analysis and problem solving outlined in the district technology plan.
___ Level 4 I frequently model and teach colleagues to employ computer-based technologies for
communication, data analysis, and problem-solving as outlined in the district technology plan.

4|Page

Name : _______________________________________________________________________________
School /Organization/Company ____________________Position ________________________________
Age: ______________________________________Educational Attainment _______________________

This form was developed by the library media specialists and teachers of the Bellingham Public Schools who based it upon the
Mankato Scale first developed by the Mankato (Minnesota) Public Schools to measure the growth of student technology skills.

5|Page



ISC- 2019 COMPUTER 100.00 SUBJECT AVERAGE
SCIENCE 50.00
SL NO. NAME 0.00 COMPUTER SCIENCE
1 KRISH NAIR 100.00
5 UJJAY JAYASHANKAR
97.00
20 SIMONE SEQUEIRA
27 AZIM ALI ASHARAF 93.00

88.00

COMPUTER SUBJECT COMPUTER
SCIENCE
AVERAGE SCIENCE
94.50
SUBJECT AVERAGE 88.00 2016-17 72.80
LOWEST 100.00
HIGHEST 2017-18 96.00

COUNT 90-100 2018-19 94.50
COUNT 80-89
COUNT 70-79 TOTAL 3 120.00 ISC RESULT ANALYSIS
COUNT 60-69 1 100.00
COUNT 50-59 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE
COUNT 40-49 0 80.00 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
0 60.00
COUNT ABOVE 50 0 40.00
COUNT ABOVE 70 4 20.00
4
4 0.00

PERCENTAGE 90-100 75.00
PERCENTAGE 80-89 25.00
PERCENTAGE 70-79
PERCENTAGE 60-69 0.00
PERCENTAGE 50-59 0.00
PERCENTAGE 40-49 0.00
0.00
% ABOVE 50
%ABOVE 70 100.00
100.00



ISC SCHOOL
AVERAGE OVER LAST

THREE YEARS

88.00

86.00 85.59
84.00

82.00

80.00 79.82
78.00

76.00

74.00 74.11

72.00

70.00

68.00
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19







ICSE - 2019 COMPUTER SUBJECT AVERAGE (2018-
APPLICATIONS 19)
SL NO. NAME OF THE STUDENT
1 HARSH BHAVESH SHAH 96.00 100.00
2 DEV PARIXITBHAI ENGINEER
81.00 50.00

COMPUTER 0.00
APPLICATIONS COMPUTER APPLICATIONS

SUBJECT AVERAGE 88.50

LOWEST 81.00 SUBJECT COMPUTER
HIGHEST AVERAGE APPLICATIONS
96.00 2016-17
COUNT 90-100 94.38
COUNT 80-89 1.00 2017-18 92.38
COUNT 70-79 1.00 88.50
COUNT 60-69 0.00 2018-19
COUNT 50-59 0.00
COUNT 40-49 TOTAL 0.00 ICSE RESULT ANALYSIS
0.00
COUNT ABOVE 50 2.00 95.00
COUNT ABOVE 70 2.00 94.00
2.00 93.00
PERCENTAGE 90-100 92.00
50.00 91.00
90.00
89.00
88.00



PERCENTAGE 80-89 50.00 87.00
PERCENTAGE 70-79 0.00 86.00
PERCENTAGE 60-69 0.00 85.00
PERCENTAGE 50-59 0.00
PERCENTAGE 40-49 0.00 COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
% ABOVE 50 100.00
%ABOVE 70 100.00



ICSE SCHOOL
AVERAGE OVER
LAST THREE YEARS

90.00

89.00

88.00

87.00

86.00

85.00

84.00

83.00
123



ICSE - 2019 COMPUTER SUBJECT AVERAGE (2018-
APPLICATIONS 19)
SL NO. NAME OF THE STUDENT
1 HARSH BHAVESH SHAH 96.00 100.00
2 DEV PARIXITBHAI ENGINEER
81.00 50.00

COMPUTER 0.00
APPLICATIONS COMPUTER APPLICATIONS

SUBJECT AVERAGE 88.50

LOWEST 81.00 SUBJECT COMPUTER
HIGHEST AVERAGE APPLICATIONS
96.00 2016-17
COUNT 90-100 94.38
COUNT 80-89 1.00 2017-18 92.38
COUNT 70-79 1.00 88.50
COUNT 60-69 0.00 2018-19
COUNT 50-59 0.00
COUNT 40-49 TOTAL 0.00 ICSE RESULT ANALYSIS
0.00
COUNT ABOVE 50 2.00 95.00
COUNT ABOVE 70 2.00 94.00
2.00 93.00
PERCENTAGE 90-100 92.00
50.00 91.00
90.00
89.00
88.00



PERCENTAGE 80-89 50.00 87.00
PERCENTAGE 70-79 0.00 86.00
PERCENTAGE 60-69 0.00 85.00
PERCENTAGE 50-59 0.00
PERCENTAGE 40-49 0.00 COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
% ABOVE 50 100.00
%ABOVE 70 100.00



ICSE SCHOOL
AVERAGE OVER
LAST THREE YEARS

90.00

89.00

88.00

87.00

86.00

85.00

84.00

83.00
123





Department of Computer Science

List of activities

1. Pre-test and Post test
2. Quiz/assignments unit wise
3. Inter House Programming League(IPL) for grade 9 and above
4. Term Project
5. IT Quiz
6. Tech Fest for juniors
7. CCA -Coding
8. Grading components
9. Curriculum expectations
10. National cyber Olympiad
11. Research based extended activity



INDIVIDUAL STUDENT TRACKING RECORD
SUBJECT - COMPUTER
GRADE - 9A

STUDENT NAME LOGICS
1 AANYA GUPTA E AULNGDSOEKRIRILSTLTHSIAMNIDICNG
2 ADVAITH ANAND PATIL W
3 CALISTO ABEL MATHIAS O E E
M W
4 CHAITANYA NILESH WAIRAGADE M O O
5 HARINI MURUGAN W
6 HARSHITA W M M
7 ISHAAN SANTOSH VAIDYA W W W
8 NEEL SHITAL SHETH O W W
9 RAHUL RAVI W W W
10 RISHABH JAINI M E E
11 SMRITTI SRIDHAR E M M
12 STEVEN SCARIA BIJI W M M
13 TAVISHI SHARMA E E E
M M
14 GARV SANGTANI M E E

15 NANDAKISHORE VINAYAKRISHNAN M M M
16 NICKELSON JOSEPH W
17 TOM MATHEW E M M
18 VARSHINI SESHAN E W
E W
E
O

E

AVERAGE

Total O 2 12 1.67
Total E 5
Total M 4 65 5.33
Total W 0
0 76 5.67
TOTAL B
45 3.00

00 0.00

AVERAGE

O% 11 6 11 9.26
E% 28
M% 22 33 28 29.63
W% 0
B% 0 39 33 31.48

61 22 28 16.67

00 0.00

100 100

O Outstanding Learner
E Exceeding
M Meeting Expectation
W Working towards Expectation
B Beginner Needs Help

INDIVIDUAL STUDENT TRACKING RECORD

SUBJECT - COMPUTER
GRADE - 10 A

STUDENT NAME LOGICS
1 ADHYAN AULNGDSOEKRIRILSTLTHSIAMNIDICNG
2 ARYA
3 CHANDRASHEKAR MM W
4 DAKSH MM M
5 HARSH MM M
6 KEEGAN EE E
7 KISHORE EE E
8 RIDHIMA WW W
9 RIYA EE E
MM M
10 TANUSH EE E
11 VISHESH
MM M
Total O WW W
Total E
Total M 000
Total W 444
Total B 554
223
O% 000
E%
M% 0 0 0
W% 36 36 36
B% 45 45 36
18 18 27
0 0 0

100 100 100

O Outstanding Learner
E Exceeding
M Meeting Expectation
W Working towards Expectation
B Beginner Needs Help

INDIVIDUAL STUDENT TRACKING RECORD
SUBJECT - COMPUTER
GRADE - XI

STUDENT NAME LOGICS
1 HARSH TUANNDDEIRNSG
ASLHIKGIMLOILRCIST
Total O
Total E O EO
Total M
Total W 10 1
Total B 01 0
00 0
O% 00 0
E% 00 0
M%
W% 100 0 100
B% 0 100 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
100 0 100
100

O Outstanding Learner
E Exceeding
M Meeting Expectation
W Working towards Expectation
B Beginner Needs Help

INDIVIDUAL STUDENT TRACKING RECORD
SUBJECT - COMPUTER
GRADE - 12 A

STUDENT NAME LOGICS
1 DHRUV UNDERSTANDING
2 HUSSAIN ALGSOKRIILTLHSIMIC
3 JATIN
4 JOSHUA O EE
5 RITIKHA E MM
6 RATHIN M ME
7 VISHESH O EE
O OE
O OE
MEE

Total O 42 0
Total E 13 6
Total M 22 1
Total W 00 0
Total B 00 0

O% 57 29 0
E% 14 43 86
M% 29 29 14
W% 00 0
B% 00 0
100 100 100

O Outstanding Learner
E Exceeding Expectation
M Meeting Expectation
W Working towards Expectation
B Beginner Needs Help

MID TERM REVIEW
GRADE – IX

ELT – COMPUTER SCIENCE

Name ELT % Target Strength Area of Strategies Teacher Remarks
90 % Hardworking, Improvement
AANYA 95 understands lack of practice Student has
GUPTA concepts, practice more marginally missed
40 good logic section A target, She will be
ADVAITH 35 lack of focus problems given more practice
ANAND 99 understands during class of Section A, Section
PATIL 80 concepts hours regularly B she scored well.
revise Student has
CALISTO 98 40 very good lack of class marginally missed
ABEL under simpler logic work and target, He will be
MATHIAS 40 standing of practice given practice on
concepts, lack of logic section A more Section A and
CHAITANYA 73 good logic for Section B &B Section B problems
NILESH hardworking, problem practice
WAIRAGADE understands more A Student almost
concepts lack of problems achieved target. He
HARINI 30 consistent will be challenged
MURUGAN interest in focus during practice with more Section A
subject class hours, section B problems
HARSHITHA 37.5 lack of logic questions Student missed the
SHA Hardworking for problems on target, He will be
KANJIRATHU lack of specific given more practice
PARAMPU consistent topics questions on Section
focus during suggested A and Section B
class hours, by
lack of logic teacher Student missed the
for problems regularly target, He will be
revise given more practice
class questions on Section
work and A and Section B
practice
section A Student missed the
and B target, He will be
regularly given more practice
revise questions on Section
class A and Section B
work and
practice
section A

RAHUL RAVI 0 40 hardworking, lack of and B He will be given more
understands consistent regularly practice questions on
revise Section A and Section
concepts, focus during class B
interested in class hours work and
subject practice Student missed the
section A target, He will be
RISHABH 75 80 hardworking, lack of good and B given practice
JAINI understands logics for regularly worksheet on Section
concepts, Section B revise B and Section A
interested in problem class
subject work and Student almost
practice achieved target. He
SMRITTI 88 90 Hardworking, lack of section A will be challenged
SRIDHAR understands practice &B with more Section A
concepts, practice problems
good logic. more A Student missed the
problems target, He will be
TAVISHI 80 90 Hardworking, lack of good given more practice
SHARMA understands logic for practice questions on Section
concepts Section B section B A and Section B
problem questions
on
specific
topics
suggested
by
teacher

MID TERM REVIEW
GRADE – X

ELT – COMPUTER SCIENCE

Name ELT Target Strength Area of Strategies Teacher
AARYA BONDGE practice Remarks
%% Improvement problems
based on Student
68 75 shows interest further few almost
important achieved
in coding improvement on concept target.
She will be
applying the practice challenged
problems with more
concepts based on Section A
few problems,
ADHYAN AGARWAL 55 60 shows interest further important back
in coding improvement on concept exercise
applying the questions
concepts practice fro text
worksheet book.
CHANDHRASHEKARAN 76 80 Good grasping logical skills on section B
BALAJI power and and self Student
understanding evaluate achieved
of concept target. He
practice will be
DAKSH SINGHVI 84 85 Good Logics further practical challenged
improvement on assignments with more
few important and self Section A
concepts evaluate problems

Student
has
marginally
missed
target, He
will be
given
practice
on more
Section A
and
Section B
problems

Student
almost
achieved
target. He
will be

HARSH RAKESH 95 99 Good practical Practice Plan challenged
MANGHNANI Logic/critical and theory part different with more
thinking strategies Section A
to solve the problems
same
problem Student
has
KEEGAN MARCELINO 30 33 Logic / More practice of practice of marginally
DSOUZA Understanding papers/worksheets worksheet missed
based on target, He
important will be
concepts given
practice
KISHORE SURESH 89 97 Good practical Practice Plan on more
Logic/critical and theory part different Section A
thinking strategies and
to solve the Section B
same problems
problem
Student
RIDHIMA HITESH 76 83 Logic / More on practical Practice achieved
KANTHARIA Worksheet target. He
Understanding part will be
based on challenged
important with more
section B Section A
problems

Student
missed
the target,
He will be
given
more
practice
questions
on Section
A and
Section B

Student
has

marginally
missed
target,
She will be
given
practice
on more
Section A
and

RIYA MANAS SHARMA 96 98 Good implementing the Working Section B
TANUSH RANJAN DAS 53 70 Logic/grasping logic in correct towards her problems
VISHESH MOTIYANI 24 40 power way to get the target. Will
solution of be Student
Hard working problem. challenged
further by missed
Hardworking practice of giving more the target,
worksheet based logical and She will be
on section A and B critical given
thinking more
Practice work problems practice
sheet based on Practice questions
similar concepts Worksheet on Section
based on A and
similar Section B
concepts
Student
Practice achieved
Worksheet
based on target. He
similar will be
concepts challenged
with more
Section A
problems

Student
achieved
target. He
will be
challenged
with more
Section A
problems

MID TERM REVIEW
GRADE – XI

ELT – COMPUTER SCIENCE

Name ELT Target Strength Area of Strategies Teacher
Remarks
HARSH BHAVESH %% Improvement Student
SHAH achieved
80 85 Student has Student will be target. He
will be
good logic, given weekly challenged
with more
good Record Book Section A
problems
understanding Practical

of concepts, worksheet.

hardworking.

MID TERM REVIEW
GRADE – XII

ELT – COMPUTER SCIENCE

Name ELT Target Strength Area of Strategies Teacher Remarks
Improvement
DHRUV %% more practice
YOGESH on Section A
GOGIA 90 95 hardworking, good Student will Student achieved
more practice practice target. He will be
logic, good on practical Section A challenged with
papers from Sample more Section A
understanding of papers problems, sample
more practice papers practice
concept. on Boolean Student will
Algebra practice Student achieved
HUSSAIN 85 90 hardworking,good Section Weekly target. He will be
HITAWALA understanding of Record Book challenged with
concept. more practice Assignments. more Section A
on Section A problems, sample
JATIN 88 95 hardworking, good Student will problem practice
logic, good more practice practice
KAMAL understanding of on Section A Boolean Student achieved
VANGANI concept. Algebra target. He will be
more practice Assignments. challenged with
JOSHUA 90 95 hardworking, good on Section A more Section A
NIGEL logic, good Student will problems, Sample
NIXON understanding of more practice practice paper problems
concept. on Section A Section A
from Sample Student achieved
RATHIN 90 95 hardworking, good papers target. He will be
KETAN logic, good challenged with
SHAH understanding of Student will more Section A
concept. practice problems, Sample
Boolean paper problem
RITIKA 90 95 hardworking, good Algebra
logic, good Assignments. Student has
RAMESH understanding of marginally missed
concept. Student will target, He will be
practice given practice on
VISWESH 90 95 hardworking, good Section A more Section A
SESHAN logic, good from Sample and Section B
understanding of papers problems

Student will Student achieved
practice target. He will be
Section A challenged with
more Section A
problems, sample
paper problems.

Student achieved
target. He will be
challenged with

concept. from Sample more Section A

papers problems, sample
paper problems