The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

349-34 - Hazard Elimination and Management List - Kepier updated for building handover

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by lpenrose, 2019-01-21 08:49:27

349-34 - Hazard Elimination and Management List - Kepier updated for building handover

349-34 - Hazard Elimination and Management List - Kepier updated for building handover

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Name of discipline low/medium/high Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or low/medium/high Work Stage Enter current
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the (NOT name of control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed [Construction/ status of design
issues not to be included. [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health Low Maintenance/
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the company) - note this Low to the contractor to control the risk? Use/Demolition] development
project] Groundworks s/c can be more than one
Groundworks s/c High
1.0 Existing Structures below ground level discipline Low
Live school environment Low
Are there any existing below ground structures? no Those attending school Civil Eng High
Demolition sub-contractor Civil Eng Low
Are there any existing deep chambers? no Asbestos specialist, Demolition
BAM High
Are there any existing tunnels? no contractor Client Low
Specialist Designer
Are there any existing below ground fuel tanks on no Demolition sub-contractor BAM Drainage outfall positions agreed. Method statement to be Construction Phase
the site with or without fuel in them? n/a agreed with BAM Site Manager Low 2
Are the existing below ground structures in poor Asbestos removal and Demolition sub- BAM Control Open
structural condition? n/a contractors
Are the existing below ground structures likely to no (except drainage connections) BAM
become unstable under construction vehicle Asbestos removal and Demolition sub- BAM
loading? no contractors
Are there likely to be any harmful or explosive
gases within existing below ground structures?
Are there any contaminants within below ground
structures such as harmful chemicals or asbestos?

Is there any rodent infestation within below ground Construction Phase
Low 2
structures? no (except assumed in drains) Control Method statement to be agreed with BAM Site Manager Open

Is there any biological contamination within existing no

below ground structures?

Are there any open topped structures below

ground level without edge protection? no

Are there any wells on the site? no

Are there likely to be any features of no
no
archaeological interest on the site?
Are there any other existing below ground Full segregation of the works from the live school. Work within Construction Phase

structures hazards not listed above?
2.0 Existing structures above ground

Are there any existing above ground structures on yes, existing school buildings Avoid school area to be carried out outside of school hours. Low 2 Open
the site? no (except tree which has been removed
Are any parts of the existing above ground Avoid Tree removed Construction Phase
structures (including boundary walls) structurally following survey) 2 Closed
unstable? no
Is there any post-tensioned concrete in the existing Construction Phase
structures? not known, possible, however minimal Low 2
Is there any high alumina cement in the existing risk as single storey buildings Control Pre-demolition survey required Open
structures?
Are there any existing above ground fuel tanks on no Specialist to remove all asbestos under controlled conditions,
the site with or without fuel in them?
Are there any contaminants within existing asbestos, refer surveys following pre-demolition survey after the school have decanted High Construction Phase
structures such as harmful chemicals or asbestos? Control to the new school building 2 Open

Is there any rodent infestation within existing no
above ground structures?

Is there any biological contamination within existing no Construction Phase
above ground structures? possible in demolition areas Low 2
Do any of the existing structures have fragile roofs Avoid Roof access not anticipated to be required during demolition Open
or roof lights? no
Has structural deterioration, partial demolition or no Reduce All services to be closed down prior to asbestos/demolition Medium Construction Phase
vandalism left any areas without adequate edge no Control works Low 2 Open
protection. yes, existing school buildings
Have existing timber structures been weakened by Plant / machinery to be decommissioned/removed prior to Construction Phase
fungal or insect attack. yes, existing school buildings contain demolition 2 Open
Are any of the existing components insecure or heating plant and teaching equipment
likely to be dislodged by the wind?
Are there any live services within existing above
ground structures?
Is there any dangerous plant or machinery within
the existing structures?

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
hazard, the work undertaken and the company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be effects on health can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
Medium to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] Asbestos removal and Demolition sub- discipline Medium
contractors Low
project] BAM
Medium
1.0 ExistAinrge Stthreurcetuarneysobtehleorwhgarzoaurndds laesvseolciated with no however detailed method statements Medium Reduce Method statements for demolition Medium Construction Phase
existing above ground structures not listed above? will be required for demolition Medium 2 Open
Medium
3.0 Interface with adjacent properties, general public and off-site operations Medium

Do pedestrians have right of way close to or High Full segregation of the works from the public. Site accee for
vehicles to be controlled. No site access during school
adjacent to the site? Low arrival/depart times Construction Phase
Low 2 Open
Adjacent to site Public and those attending school BAM Control
BAM
Are there any public right of ways across the site? No BAM
BAM
Are there any restrictions on grounds of health and BAM
BAM
safety to cranes oversailing adjoining property? yes, although should not be a requirement Operatives/neighbours BAM Avoid Crane oversailing not anticipated Closed

Is it legally or physically impractical for a contractor BAM

to get access to work on boundary walls from the n/a BAM Full segregation of the works from the public. Site accee for
neighbours’ side? BAM vehicles to be controlled. No site access during school
Does the location of the access off the public arrival/depart times Low Construction Phase
2 Open
highway affect the safety of pedestrians and road yes, adjacent entrance to a live school Public and those attending school Control Noise, dust supression
users? Control Low Construction Phase
Is the building close to premises that are sensitive 2 Open

to noise, dust and vibration etc such as hospitals yes, school Public and those attending school
and schools?
Will there be interfaces with any third party

construction operations at the beginning, during, or yes, interfaces with existing school for School employees and pupils Control Any works beyond construction secure line to be carried out in Closed
towards the end of the works? For example site Yes, seencatbiolinnaglwcoomrkpslaentidofnitoonuctowmoprklestion School employees and pupils consultation with the school and out of school hours
enabling works and fit out works by others.
Will there be any sectional handovers that will of new school, followed by decant and Any works beyond construction secure line to be carried out in Low Construction Phase
mean an interface with the occupiers' operations demolition of existing school Control consultation with the school and out of school hours 2 Open
and access?
Will works impede the means of escape from

nearby premises or restrict access to them by Not if adequate space retained for existing School employees and pupils Control Segregation fence lines to ensure escape/emergency access Low Construction Phase
emergency vehicles? school routes maintained 2 Open

4.0 Access for safe construction

Does the location of structures or below ground

services mean excavating close to existing live Yes, existing electricity, water, gas and
services? drainage on the site requires modification

and extension to serve the new building BAM C subcontractors will be making Risks reduced by ensuring drawings identify the hazards and Medium
detailed RAMS are produced and adhered to.
and retianed buildings. the necessary modifications and Risks also reduced by careful mapping of existing services and
planning of works, particularly around the existing sub-station
HV electrical services are present upgrades to the site utilities. Risk of Construction Phase
2 Open
underground into the existing sub-station electrocution Control

Is space for manoeuvring vehicles on site likely to no
be restricted? no
Is space for site accommodation and storage likely
to be restricted?

Does the location of structures or below ground not anticipated however materials Groundworks s/c Control Works to be carried out in accordance with materials Low Construction Phase
services mean excavating through areas of management plan in place produced by management plan 2 Open
contaminated ground?
Curtins

Does the location of structures or below ground yes, for the drainage connections across Control Sub-scan survey available. Site surveys/investigation prior to all Low Construction Phase
services mean excavating close to existing live the existing school grounds Groundworks s/c excavation works 2 Open
services?
Is the location of structures or below ground

services likely to mean undermining, surcharging or no
excessively vibrating adjacent structures?
Are the works likely to prevent natural dispersal of

storm water or allow ingress of storm water where no
previously not possible?
5.0 Site Works

Are the works likely to prevent natural dispersal of

storm water or allow ingress of storm water where no
previously not possible?

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health discipline Low
Low
project] BAM
BAM High
1.0 ExistWinigll Setarurtchtumroevsinbgeloorwogthroeur nwdolreksvealffect the stability
BAM Medium
of existing earth retaining structures by increasing no BAM Low
or decreasing surcharge loads?
Is it likely that temporary construction loads will

endanger the stability of new retaining structures? no all site operatives Control Floor slab loading to be controled Closed
yes, upper floor slabs accommodate Groundworks s/c Control
Are suspended slabs and retaining walls designed Works to be carried out in accordance with materials Low Construction Phase
to accommodate construction traffic? normal construction loading management plan 2 Open
Does the location of structures or below ground
services mean excavating through areas of not anticipated however materials
contaminated ground? management plan in place produced by

Curtins

Does the location of structures or below ground

services mean excavating close to existing live Yes, existing electricity, water, gas and
services? drainage on the site requires modification

and extension to serve the new building Risks reduced by ensuring drawings identify the hazards and Medium
detailed RAMS are produced and adhered to.
and retianed buildings. Risks also reduced by careful mapping of existing services and
planning of works, particularly around the existing sub-station
HV electrical services are present Construction Phase
Method statement required and close site management/control 2 Open
underground into the existing sub-station Groundworks s/c & BAM SE Control
Control Prefabricated ground beams specified Closed
Will the designed levels of pad foundations mean yes Groundworks s/c Avoid
deep excavation? prefabricated ground beams designed Groundworks s/c Closed
Does the design of ground beam reinforcement
make its prefabrication impractical?
6.0 Water related hazards

Is the site on or near the coast? no

Are there any lakes, ponds or reservoirs on or near no

the site? no
Is their any marshland on or near the site?

Are there any natural watercourses such as no

streams, rivers or estuaries running across or close

to the site?
Are there any non-natural watercourses on the site no

or close to it such as canals, flood relief channels

or drainage ditches?
Are there any natural underground watercourses or no

springs on or near the site? no
Are there any culverted or aqueducted

watercourses on or near the site? no
Are there any docks, harbours or marinas on or

near the site?
Are there any swimming pools on or near the site? no

Are there any river or coastal flood defence no

structures on or near the site?

Are there any other water related structures such no

as derricks, locks, weirs, or sluices on or near the

site?
Is there any deep or fast flowing water on or near no

the site?
Are there any areas of tidal water on or near the no

site? no
Does the level of the water table mean that

excavations will fill with groundwater?
Does the site or surrounding area have a history of no

flooding?
7.0 Piling Operations

Are there any hazards associated with getting a Pad foundations and ground bearing slab

piling rig to the site or manoeuvring it to the points (no piles)
where piles will be placed?
Is the ground unable to maintain the stability of a n/a

piling rig?

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health discipline

project]

1.0 ExistIisngthSetr“uscptiunr-oefsf”boeflodwebgrriosufrnodmleavueglered piling likely n/a

to be within range of other construction activities or

the general public?
Do concrete pile heads have to be broken down, n/a

thereby necessitating working methods that

eliminate or minimise the use of hand held vibrating

Itsoovlisb?ration from driven piles likely to endanger the n/a

stability of nearby structures?
Is noise and vibration from driven piles likely to be n/a

detrimental to the health of anyone on or close to

the site? any other piling related hazards not listed n/a
Are there

above?
8.0 Superstructure

Are cranage or hoisting restrictions likely to require no

the minimizing of component sizes or special

localised in situ work?
Can the way components are prefabricated help to no

minimise high level working during site erection?

Is the structure likely to be temporarily unstable temporary steel erection bracing All site operatives
during the course of construction? incorporated and designed by sub-
contractor Medium
Medium
Are there any special erection sequences that yes, to suit temporary bracing proposals All site operatives Specialist Designer Control Temporary bracing designed Construction Closed
must be followed? Specialist Designer Medium Control Temporary bracing designed Construction Closed
Steelwork sub-contractor Low
Has any part of the structure been designed for no Intumescent/decoration contractor BAM
BAM Medium
temporary site purposes? e.g. an area of floor BAM

strengthened as temporary loading bay? no
Are there any unusual methods of construction

that have particular hazards associated with them?

e.g. 'top-down" construction?
Will the shape of any of the steel members make no (oversized base plates omitted

them difficult to sling when lifting? following comments from

fabricator/erector) Avoid Oversized base plates omitted Construction Closed
Control
Will any of the bolted connection be difficult to no Painting/treatment to be carried out once edge protection
access, particularly those at high level? Discussed, however not feesible installed
Could the high level painting and fire protection of
steelwork be minimised by pre-application offsite? Construction Closed

Will the shape of any of the steel members make no
them difficult to sling when lifting?
Will the layout and spacing of structural members Parapet construction incorporates All site operatives
make it difficult attach temporary handrails during
floor, roof and wall construction? construction handrail requirements.

Perimeter beams drilled to accommodate Parapet deigned to suit construction protection requirements.
Easi-edge protection to perimeter of building
Easi- edge protection Control Construction Closed

Is there likely be any avoidable site welding or no

cutting that could be reduced by appropriate

prefabrication of components? no
Will it be difficult to reach the external faces of

perimeter beams and columns to safely erect and

strike formwork, particularly at high level? no
Where craning is impractical, is it likely that the

weight of any reinforcement will be too great for

manual handling? n/a
If composite floors are used, is it likely that

temporary propping of the profiled steel decking will

be required to accommodate construction live load

or the load from the wet concrete?

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
Medium to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health discipline Medium
Specialist Designer
project] Medium
Struct Eng
1.0 ExistWinhgeSntrupcretu-craesstbceolnocwregtreouflonodrleuvneitls and staircases yes Steelwork sub-contracor Medium
BAM Medium
are used, is it likely that they will require lifting
BAM low
points cast in to hold them securely during lifting Specialist Designer Control Lifting points designed into precast elements Construction Closed
Specialist Designer Medium
and installation? Only adequate bearing. Beams designed to Steelwork sub-contracor
When pre-cast concrete floor units and staircases Specialist Designer

are used, is there anything that must be taken into accommodate loading from one side
account during installation in order to avoid
during installation
instability?
Control Bearings designed within safety tolerances Construction Closed

9.0 Elevations n/a

Where space for scaffolding is restricted, is it yes - refer method statenets from relevant all site operatives
practical to use pre-fabricated façades craned in sub-contractors
and fixed from inside the building avoiding the
nDeoeadnfyoor fatnheexintedrinvaidlusaclacffoomldp?onents listed below Medium
weigh more that 20 kg and require a degree of
manual handling? Control Method statements for erection/lifting methodology required Construction Phase
Standard masonry blocks? 2 Open
Pre-cast features?
Secondary steelwork?
Shelf angles?
Lintels?
Window frames and curtain?
Curtain wall components?
Double glazed and other glass units?
Other components making up the elevations?

Is it likely that pre-cast features will require cast-in n/a Roofing sub-contractor
lifting eyes or pockets? no
Are pre-cast features likely to be temporarily
unstable during installation or while awaiting entrance canopy - no parapets
following trades?
Are there any canopies, cornices, brises, soleils, Temporary edge protection required. Access to curtain walling
deep eaves overhangs or other designed below canopy to be controlled
projections from the elevations that will interfere
with cranage or close access by mobile platforms?

Control Closed

10. Roofing

When profiled metal roofing is used, is the inner no (lining sheet to canopy only, concrete Roofing s/c
Roofing s/c
liner sheet incapable of taking foot traffic? (Unlike slabs elsewhere)
composite panels that provide an immediate
Control Lining sheet to be capable of taking foot traffic Construction Closed
wWohrekningprpolfailetfdormm.e)tal roofing is used, is the sheet no (lining sheet to canopy only, concrete Control Lining sheet to be designed to illiminate trip hazard Construction Closed

profile likely to be a trip hazards during construction slabs elsewhere)
or maintenance?
Is the slope of the roof and its lack of slip no - flat roof structure

resistance likely to be a hazard during construction

or maintenance?
Will any gutters be incapable of taking foot traffic at flat roof - no gutters

any time during construction or maintenance?

Are any parts of the roof covering or the roof lights No - rooflights are non fragile Roofing s/c Control Method statement/management to ensure safe system of Construction Closed
yes - hot melt roof finish working
not "man-safe”?
Are there any fire hazards associated with the

roofing materials e.g. hot asphalt, torch-on etc?
11.0 Interior

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Name of discipline low/medium/high Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or low/medium/high Work Stage Enter current
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the (NOT name of control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed [Construction/ status of design
issues not to be included. [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health Medium Maintenance/
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the company) - note this Medium to the contractor to control the risk? Use/Demolition] development
project] can be more than one
Low
1.0 ExistDinogaStnryucotfutrheesibnedlioviwdugarol cuonmdpleovneelnts listed below yes - refer method statenets from relevant all site operatives discipline Low
weigh more that 20 kg and require a degree of sub-contractors Low
manual handling? BAM
Standard masonry blocks? BAM Medium Control Method statements for erection/lifting methodology required Construction Closed
Pre-cast features? Control Construction Closed
Secondary steelwork? BAM High Method statements for erection/lifting methodology required
Lintels? BAM Low Control
Large glazed units? Medium Control Temporary access staicase to first phase only permanent
Other components used internally? BAM staircase to phases 2 and 3.
Low
Are there any large prefabricated units, such as Prefabricated plant room on roof All operatives during Temporary access staicase to first phase only permanent
prefabricated toilet pods? lifting/installation staircase to phases 2 and 3.

Can relevant design information be released in yes (first pase staircase installation will All operatives

time to allow pre-cast or in-situ stairs to be used as however be delayed)
permanent access on site early on in the works?
Construction Closed

Does the height of the building mean a secondary Secondary means of escape is provided All operatives Low
means of escape is required during construction?
Construction Closed

Can relevant design information be released in yes All operatives
time allow parts of the fire protection and
compartmentation used to protect fire escape Low
12.0 ExteroruntaelsWdourrkinsg the works?
Control Partitions/enclosures to be installed early in programme Construction Open
Are weights of external works materials kept to a
minimum, e.g. paving slabs, kerbs? yes
Will external landscaping layouts affect access for no
cleaning and maintenance?
13.0 Services Yes, dining area, LRC and Main Hall all C, M. Risk of falling

Is there any unusually high level working; e.g. have lighting and ductwork/grilles at high
equipment mounted externally or atria?

level. LRC & Main Hall also have radiant

panels at high level. Also roof light wells

will require birdcage or other means of Medium
Residual
access/protection during construction of

internal finishings.

BAM Control Risk assessments to be written and included within the O&M Open
manuals for high level working
BAM Services
Is there any confined space working; e.g. roof no Engineering

voids, chambers, basements, congested plant MEP
BAM Services
rooms? Yes. Prefabricated plantroom at roof level. C. Specialist craneage required to lift Engineering
Is there any unusually heavy equipment; e.g.
BAM
transformers, switchgear, boilers, tanks, motors, AHUs at roof level. Boilers and hot water packaged plant and plantroom to roof

pumps, pre-fabricated elements? heater at roof level within the level. Risks associated with crane work Detailed RAMS relating to plant movement to be written as part Low
of the sub-contract package to be arranged by BAM Services Residual
containerised plantroom Engineering

Reduce Open

Is there an unusually high risk of electrocution, fire, no
explosion or contact with noxious substances?

Can any measures be taken to minimise site Yes, dado trunking and exposed pipework C Avoid
chasing for services? drops to be boxed in where required
Are there any implications of services being made Yes. The programme of works will require C, Reduce Management of programme Construction Closed
live during construction phase? retained buildings to be made live prior to
completion of works to the new building. Groundworks s/c Control Works to be carried out in accordance with materials Low Construction Phase
Does the location of below ground services mean management plan 2 Open
excavating through areas of contaminated not anticipated however materials
ground? management plan in place produced by

Curtins

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
High to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health discipline
Medium
project] Yes, existing electricity, water, gas and BAM Services Risks reduced by ensuring drawings identify the hazards and
1.0 ExistDinogeSstrtuhcetulorceastbioenloowf bgerolouwndgrloeuvenld services mean drainage on the site requires modification Engineering Medium detailed RAMS are produced and adhered to.
and extension to serve the new building Medium Risks also reduced by careful mapping of existing services and
excavating close to other live services? BAM Services planning of works, particularly around the existing sub-station
Medium
and retianed buildings. BAM Medium
Low
HV electrical services are present MEP Low Low Construction Phase
Low 2 Open
underground into the existing sub-station C Control
Low
Is the location of below ground services likely to no

mean the undermining of adjacent structures? New gas, water and electrical services to C. Risk of electrocution and explosion. Control Hand dig around all live services. Agree with School a shut down Construction Closed
Will there be any deep excavation for services? Drainage depth increases towards outfall
Are there any below ground chambers requiring

deep excavation e.g. backdrop manholes, storm-

water attenuation tanks, fuel tank etc? Groundworks s/c Control Excavation safety measures to be in place Construction Open

14.0 Service Risers

Does the amount of services within the risers mean Possibly - to be reviewed with BAM MEP s/c Reduce Prefabrication where appropriate. Low Residual Open

working in confined spaces at any point? services

Is fall protection necessary at access into service Yes, during construction only C. Risk of falls and falling objects from

risers? above Use appropriate protection to riser shafts during construction.
Give operatives appropriate training and equipment to work in
BAM Reduce Construction Closed
or near service risers Duragrid to be installed

Are there any excessive distances between access no
points into service risers? For example, where

access is not provided at every floor level?

15.0 Cleaning, maintenance and replacement of building services

Is frequent maintenance required to any of the Yes. C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk
of injury if inadequate access is
following items of roof mounted plant and if so how provided

is it accessed? C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk
of injury if inadequate access is
Air handling units? provided Low

Chillers? C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk
of injury if inadequate access is
Fans? provided

Tanks? MEP Control Permenant access provided to all plant areas Construction Residual
MEP
Are there any items of equipment that need testing Yes. MEP

and re-setting at frequent intervals, such as fire Low

shutters and fire dampers? If so how are they

accessed? Control All dampers to be provided with ductwork access panels Construction Residual

Is there any equipment mounted in ceiling or roof Yes.
voids that require access hatches, walkways, safe
step off locations from ladders etc? For example Low
tanks, void smoke detectors, sprinkler heads,
valves and fire dampers. Control Where possible all equipment is located within accessible Construction Residual
sections of the ceiling

Is any plant or equipment located in other no

restricted areas, for example basements? no

Is frequent access required to tall or double

stacked plant?
Are any provisions incorporated into the design for no

installing and replacing major plant that cannot be

man-handled and where direct cranage may be

impractical? For example, lifting beams and

removable panels for air handling units, chillers,

Wlarhgeeremmoteodrsiuamndsizbeodileitresm? s of plant cannot be Yes C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk
of injury if inadequate access is
manually handled, is it practical to manoeuvre provided

mechanical lifting plant into position?

MEP Control Permenant access routes provided Construction Closed

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
Low to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health discipline Low

project] MEP Medium
Medium
1.0 ExistAinrge Stthreurcetuarneyslbigehlot wfittginrogus,ncdcltevvcealmeras, Low maintenance LED lighting provided. C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk MEP Medium

illuminated signs etc mounted externally or of injury if inadequate access is Struct Eng Low Low
internally that are normally inaccessible from provided Residual
ground or floor level? If so, how are they Arch Medium
Arch LEDs are virtually maintenance free, but when access is required Low
maintained and what features are incorporated into to column mounted luminaires or HL cameras MEWP type Residual
MEP access equipment will be required.
the design to assist that? Arch Control Open
Open
Is there any high level equipment within stairwells; Access to detectors at top of stairwell. C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk
e.g. light fittings, smoke detectors, fire alarm of injury if inadequate access is
sounders, valves? provided Will require the provision of a temporary platform although
testing will normally be achieved via an extended pole from
Control landing level.

Are there any storm water attenuation chambers no

on the site and what is the maximum depth of

water that could be present in them? n/a
If a person were to fall into a storm water

attenuation chamber, would it be impossible for

them to get out unaided?

Are there any deep manholes and how are the Manhole access via step irons and Groundworks s/c Control Correct manhole specification Low ResiduaL Open

drains connected to them accessed? platforms
Are there any other deep chambers, pumping no

stations etc?

16.0 Cleaning, Maintenance and replacement of building fabric

Is it impractical to clean any of the exterior glazing windows, cladding All maintenance operatives

while standing at ground or floor? If so, how is it Low

cleaned and what features are incorporated into Control Refer Ryder maintenance drawing Residual Open
Control Refer Ryder maintenance drawing Open
the design to assist that? All maintenance operatives Low
Is it impractical to clean any of the interior glazing screens, windows, wall finishes Open
Residual Open
(including interior faces of external glazing) while

standing at floor level? If so, how is it cleaned and

what features are incorporated into the design to

Aasresisatntyhaeta?ves gutters normally inaccessible from n/a

the roof of the building? If so, how are they

maintained and what features are incorporated into

the design to assist that? Low maintenance LED lighting provided at C,M. Maintenance of equipment. Risk LEDs are virtually maintenance free, but when access is required
Are there any light fittings, cctv cameras,

illuminated signs etc mounted externally or 3m and CCTV cameras at 3-4m of injury if inadequate access is to column mounted luminaires or HL cameras MEWP type

internally that are normally inaccessible from provided access equipment will be required.

ground or floor level? If so, how are they Exisitng external lighitng columns and Low

maintained and what features are incorporated CCTC cameras will require periodic Existing external services requiring periodic maintenance to be

into the design to assist that? maintenance Control accessed via MEWP Residual

Is it impractical to replace any of the glazing while screens, windows All maintenance operatives

standing at floor or ground level? If so, how is the Low

glazing replaced and how is the glass taken to its Control Refer Ryder maintenance drawing Residual

lIosctahteiouns?e of mobile access equipment used for no

cleaning and maintenance likely to be restricted by

emergency vehicle routes or public areas etc?

Is there any high level equipment within stairwells? no

Are there any canopies, cornices, brises soleils, or no

other projections from the elevations that are not

designed to carry the weight of a man? Design loads, bracing requiremnents Building occupants and contractors
Is there any particular feature of the building Demolition s/c

structure that should be made clear to a future Medium Low
Medium
contactor carrying out alterations to allow them to Struct Eng Control Manuals to indicate loading/bracing restrictions Residual Open
Struct Eng Control Manuals to indicate requirements Open
dIsoththeerewaonrky ssapfeeclyif?ic sequence of demolition Refer As-built manuals Low

sequence that a future demolition contactor should Residual

follow?

Hazard Elimination and Management List Form: 349-34 - Rev 03

Project Name and No.: Kepier School Date: Is
Prepared by: C Donkin
Contributions From: J. Roberts
Client: ESFA

This Hazard Elimination and Management List has been developed to assist the Client, Principal Designer, Designers, Principal Contractor and Contractors in identification of significant project hazards. This document should also identify the actions that can be taken to remove, reduce or control hazards to a tolerable level. All
members of the project team are expected to contribute to the list and the Principal Designer will maintain the list through contribution from the project team. The hazards identified will be reviewed by the Principal Designer throughout the design development with formal review at the sign off of each design stage.
(Example shown in Italics below )

Ref Hazard Identification Element of design Persons at Risk, their Operations and Risk Owner Initial Risk Rating Avoid, reduce, Risk Reduction Proposals (with options/alternatives recorded) Current Risk Status Work Stage Risk Closed,
the Consequences control Open or Residual

Significant hazard to be entered. It could be a Name of discipline Work Stage
(NOT name of [Construction/
design element, a material or an activity. Trivial Location of design on site where the Identify all persons exposed to the Avoid, reduce, Team actions with options considered, required to eliminate or Maintenance/ Enter current
company) - note this control reduce risks. If none possible, what information will be passed Use/Demolition] status of design
issues not to be included. hazard or potential hazard will be hazard, the work undertaken and the can be more than one low/medium/high low/medium/high
Medium to the contractor to control the risk? development
[Remove clauses below that are not relevant to the [decription or drawing/survey reference] effects on health discipline
Medium
project] Arch

1.0 ExistIisngthSetrreucatnuyrepsobset ltoewnsgiroonuenddcloenvecrlete in the no BAM

structure?
17.0 Rooflights, horizontal and sloping glazing

Are there any roof lights or areas of horizontal or Rooflights All maintenance operatives

sloping glazing if so?

How are they cleaned from above?

How are they cleaned from below?

How is the glass (or other material) replaced? Low

Is laminated glass (or other suitable material) Residual

necessary in locations where persons or tools may

fall through during construction or maintenance Control Refer Ryder maintenance drawing Open

(particularly where public are below)? No, non fragile glazing specified
Is edge protection (or other safety measure)

provided round the perimeter of glazing at roof

level? no
Is there any fixed furniture below that will make

access to the underside of glazing difficult?
18.0 Hazardous materials, dust and fumes etc

Will the setting out of bricks blocks mean excessive no

site cutting? no
Will the design of components using fibrous

boarding such as MDF mean an excessive amount

of on site cutting? yes All site operatives Offsite spray considered however not financially viable.
Is there any spray applied fire protection? Therefore installation to be controlled

Control Construction Closed

Are any solvent-based adhesives specified? no
no
Are any epoxy-based materials specified that

generate toxic fumes? no
Do any of the decorative finishes use acid or

solvent-based materials?
Are there any other hazardous materials specified?


Click to View FlipBook Version