PROJECT GUIDELINE Anyflip

Project Guideline Diploma in Information Technology (Digital Technology)
Politeknik Malaysia
1st Edition

@Percetakan Zainon Kassim Sdn Bhd
Cetakan Pertama: Disember 2018

Hak cipta terpelihara. Tiada bahagian daripada terbitan ini boleh diterbitkan semula, disimpan
untuk pengeluaran atau ditukar kepada sebarang bentuk atau dengan sebarang alat juga pun,
sama ada dengan cara elektronik gambar, fotokopi, rakaman dan sebagainya, sebelum
mendapat kebenaran bertulis daripada pihak Penerbitan Percetakan Zainon Kassim Sdn. Bhd.

All rights reserved. None of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopy, recording or any information
storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the Penerbitan Percetakan
Zainon Kassim Sdn. Bhd.

Diterbitkan dan dicetak di Malaysia oleh / Published and printed in Malaysia by
PERCETAKAN ZAINON KASSIM SDN. BHD.
30100 No.1 TKT Kilang Kaw P'Ind Silibin Ipoh Perak,
Kawasan Perkilangan Jelapang, 30100 Ipoh,
Perak Darul Ridzuan.
Tel: 05-528 0506

i

COMMITTEES

ADVISOR

HASANAH BINTI MD AMIN (BK JPPKK)
NIZAM BIN MOHD NASIR (PSIS)

WRITER

ABD AZIZ BIN BAKERI (BK JPPKK)
MUHAMMAD FAIZ BIN PAUZI (BK JPPKK)
MOHAMMAD NOOR BIN IBRAHIM (PSIS)
SITI DIANAH BINTI ABDUL BUJANG (PSIS)
AINIE HAYATI BINTI NORUZMAN (PSIS)

SYAIFUL IZWAN MAHMUD (PSIS)
RUZANNA BINTI ABU BAKAR (PSIS)

ZALEHA BINTI SALAMON (PSIS)
SHARIZAN BINTI MAT SAAT (PSIS)

ANIRAH BINTI AHMAD (PSP)
LIYANA BINTI MAT RANI (PSP)
SAIFUL BAHARIN BIN HAIRUDDIN (PUO)
NURIZAH BINTI MAHMOR (PUO)
MOHD RAZIF MUSTAPHA (PBU)
NOORISMAAWI BIN YUSOP (PBU)
MOHD ASYRAF BIN MOHD ARSHAD (PSP)
ROHAZLIN BINTI MOHAMED IQBAL (PSP)
RASMALIZA BINTI RASHID (PKT)

ROZITA BINTI MD ALI (PKT)
FAZILAH BINTI ISMAIL (PMS)
NOR ANALIZA BT CHE KHALID (PMS)

FIFDIL MAJIWAN (PMU)
NORADILAH BINTI HJ SUKOR (PMJ)
MAS AYU BINTI MOHD ARIFF (PMJ)

ANDING ANAK NYUAK (PKS)

EDITOR

MOHAMMAD NOOR BIN IBRAHIM (PSIS)
SITI DIANAH BINTI ABDUL BUJANG (PSIS)

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES

NO. TITLE 1
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 PROJECT TITLE SELECTION CRITERIA 2
3.0 PROJECT PROCEDURES 3
4.0 PROJECT PLANNER 4
5.0 PROJECT GANTT CHART 5
6.0 DOCUMENTATION FORMAT 8
7.0 TECHNICAL PROJECT REPORT
8.0 ASSESSMENT RUBRIC 24
9.0 APPENDIX 25
26
Appendix i : Proposal Guidelines 27
Appendix ii : Technical / Proposal Report Cover 28
Appendix iii : Task Summaries 29
Appendix iv : Testing
Appendix v : Compliance and Auditing / Checklist Form
Appendix vi : References

iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

PROJECT GUIDELINE Diploma in Information Technology (Digital Technology) Politeknik
Malaysia is to be used by student and lecturer of Jabatan Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi
Politeknik Malaysia. This guideline is for Diploma in Information Technology (Digital
Technology) track Networking System, track Software and Application Development and track
Information Security only. The student project is a compulsory course to be taken for 5th
semester students for the 3 years and 4th semester students for the 2.5 years diploma program.
Each student will complete a project based on their field of study. The project guideline allows
the students an opportunity to practice their theoretical knowledge and problem solving in the
area of information technology. Students will be assessed on their skills in designing, problem
solving, and performing technical management work.

2.0 PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
i. Projects must be developed in accordance to the requirements of industry, community

or organization and can be commercialized if appropriate.
ii. Projects should have future upgrade values, which can be made to improve the quality

of the project.
iii. All propose projects must be original. Students who plagiarized will be STRICTLY

penalized and result will be failed.
iv. Selection of project scope and topic can be done through discussion with the

coordinator and supervisor. Student also can propose the topic themselves, and must be
approved by the head of program, coordinator or supervisor.

3.0 PROJECT PROCEDURES
i. Change project title

Students are allowed to change their project title within ONE (1) week with project
coordinator or supervisor approval.
ii. Task Summary
Each student should describe their task individually. The task should be different within
team members.
iii. Attendance
Attendance must be at least 80%, if not students’ coursework assessments marks will be
disregarded.
iv. Copyright
The Polytechnic will be the owner of all findings, designs, patents and other intellectual
property rights of the student projects.
v. Plagiarism
Students may discuss with their supervisors if they are in doubt of plagiarism. If found
committed plagiarism, strict action will be taken against the students.

1

4.0 PROJECT PLANNER

WEEK SHORT TASK ASSESSMENT MARK REMARK
Week 1 SEM
Week 2 1.0 PROJECT PROPOSAL. PROPOSAL CLO 1(10%) STUDENT /
Week 1 1.1 Prepare project plan and project PRESENTATION SUPERVISOR
design CLO 2(20%) STUDENT /
DEMO #1 SUPERVISOR /
Week 3 Week 2 DEMO #2 CLO 2(20%) ACCESSOR
Week 4 STUDENT /
CAPSTONE PROJECT SUPERVISOR
Week 5 Week 3 1. Technical Report STUDENT /
Week 6 2. End Product SUPERVISOR
3. Log Book STUDENT /
Week 7 Week 4 2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. SUPERVISOR
Week 5 2.1 Plan requirement and design STUDENT /
Week 8 Week 6 specifications. SUPERVISOR
Week 7 2.2 Manage the hardware or software STUDENT /
Week 9 Week 8 configuration. SUPERVISOR
Week 2.3 Develop problem specification and STUDENT /
design. SUPERVISOR
10 STUDENT /
Week 3.0 DELIVERABLES. SUPERVISOR
3.1 Present deliverables. STUDENT /
11 SUPERVISOR
Week CAPSTONE PROJECT PRESENTATION. STUDENT /
● Capstone project presentation SUPERVISOR
12 ● Capstone Correction STUDENT /
Week ● Re-Present Capstone Project SUPERVISOR
● Full Documents and Project STUDENT /
13 Submitted SUPERVISOR
Week
STUDENT /
14 SUPERVISOR

Week CLO 1(5 %) STUDENT /
15 CLO 2(45 %) SUPERVISOR /
GSA (100%)
ACCESSOR

*This planner can be amendable accordance to polytechnic

2

5.0 PROJECT GANTT CHART

WEEKS W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15
WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 WEEK 8
PLANNING WEEK 5 WEEK 6 WEEK 7

1.0 PROJECT PROPOSAL.
Prepare project plan and project design
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT.

2.1 Plan requirement and design specifications.
2.2 Manage the hardware or software configuration.
2.3 Develop problem specification and design.
DEMO 1 PRESENTATION
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. (Continue)
2.1 Plan requirement and design specifications.
2.2 Manage the hardware or software configuration.
2.3 Develop problem specification and design.
DEMO 2 PRESENTATION
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. (Continue)
2.1 Plan requirement and design specifications.
2.2 Manage the hardware or software configuration.
2.3 Develop problem specification and design.
3.0 DELIVERABLES.
3.1 Present deliverables.
CAPSTONE PROJECT PRESENTATION
● Capstone project presentation
● Project refining
● Re-Present Capstone Project
● Full Documents and Project Submission

*This Gantt chart can be amendable accordance to polytechnic

3

6.0 DOCUMENTATION FORMAT
Table 1.0 shows the documentation format for technical report.
Table 1.0 : Documentation Format

ITEMS DESCRIPTION
Cover Page The cover of technical project report must contain project title, authors
name, registration number, department name, polytechnic name and
session of study.
* Refers at Appendix 2.

Paper and Size Use only high quality white A4 70-gram or A4 80-gram paper, size
210mm X 297mm.

Margin For each page, the margin should be:
● Left: 40 mm
● Right, Top and Bottom: 25 mm
● Header and Footer: 15 mm

Format 1.15 spacing should be used in preparing the technical project report
including tables or charts. The format which acceptable is:

● Font Type: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12 pt.
● Chapter Title: Uppercase, Bold, Centered

(e.g: 1.0 PROJECT PLAN)
● Chapter Sub-section: Title Case, Bold, Align left

(e.g: 1.1 Introduction)
● Paragraph: Justify

Figure and Table All tables, charts, figures, and graphs should be numbered and titled.
Both number and title should be centered either directly above tables
label or directly below figure label. The numbering must be related to
the Chapter.
(e.g: Figure 1.1: The Interface of System)

Number of Chapter Number of Figure/Table

(e.g: Table 2.1: Hardware Requirement)

Technical Project Report must be written minimum 30 pages length and not more than 50
Report pages EXCLUDED front page, appendix and references.

Paging Bottom right.

References Any material taken from another source must be cited and a brief
reference to its source must be included in the text. Students must
follow The American Psychological Association (APA) reference citations
style for references in text.
* Refers at Appendix 6.

Binding Report cover must be comb binding with plastic cover, blue color and 14
times New Roman font face.

4

7.0 TECHNICAL PROJECT REPORT
Table 2.0 shows the content of technical report.

Table 2.0 : Content of technical report

NO. ITEMS DESCRIPTION
ABSTRACT A brief summary of project to help user understand the
project problems, purpose, methods and scope but NOT
TABLE OF CONTENT results, conclusions and recommendations. It must be
1.0 PROJECT PLAN below 100 words only in one paragraph.

Table of content must have page number and sequence
to the report items.

1.1 Introduction
A brief description of the product to be produced.
1.2 Problem Statement
A concise description of an issue to be addressed or a
condition to be improved.
1.3 Objective of Project
Purpose of the project should be in point form
e.g:

i. Objective 1
ii. Objective 2
iii. Objective 3
The objectives must be specific, measurable, achievable,
relevant and time oriented.
1.4 Scope of Project
State the user scope or project boundaries while doing
this project. This scope will make sure that this project
will be done correctly according to the stated scope. It is
suggested to state scope by module of function.
*The details of the scope depend on supervisor or client
needs.

1.5 Literature Review
Reference of previous studies that relevant to the
project.
1.6 Methodology of Project
Briefly explain the project development model based on
methodology that suitable with the project.
1.7 Project Gantt Chart
Create the timeline of the project progress to complete
the project. Refer to page 3 (Project Gantt Chart).

5

NO. ITEMS DESCRIPTION
2.0 REQUIREMENT 2.1 Functional Requirement
List of project main functions.
SPECIFICATION 2.2 Non Functional Requirement
Define system attributes such as security, reliability,
3.0 FINAL DESIGN performance, maintainability, scalability and usability.
2.3 Hardware and Software Requirement
List of hardware and software specification to be used in
the project in a table form.
2.4 System Configuration
Explain how to configure the system.
2.5 Security Requirement / Exceptional Handling
Explain the security features / exceptional handling
method implemented in the project.
3.1 Logical Design
Explain and show the detailed of logical design project. It
includes all system development diagrams such as data
flow diagram, flowcharts, entity relationship diagram,
contact diagram, schematic diagrams and network
logical topology.
3.2 Physical Design
Explain and show the detailed of physical design project.
It includes all user interface design network physical
topology.
or
3.2 Experimental Concept
Explain and show the detailed planning of studies to
meet objective, collect data using suitable tools and
executed experiment.

6

NO. ITEMS DESCRIPTION
4.0 TEST DESCRIPTION Students need to explain the development of process
and result of the project. The testing processes also must
AND RESULTS be done to verify the functionality of the project.

4.1 Unit Testing Plan
Describe the unit testing scope and activities based on
the given example.

4.2 Integration Testing Plan
Describe the integration testing activities based on the
given example.

4.3 User Acceptance Test (if applicable)
Describe the user acceptance testing activities based on
the given example.
*The example refers at Appendix 4.

5.0 DISCUSSIONS 5.1 Advantage of the Project
List the advantage(s) of end product / final output that
has been achieved.

5.2 Limitation of the Project
List the limitation(s) of end product / final output.

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND Students should make conclusion about the project and
RECOMMENDATIONS discuss the importance of the project outcome. Students
also have to make recommendation(s) or suggestion(s)
in order to enhance the project for future works.

7.0 REFERENCE List of works cited from published books, public
document, journals, articles, thesis, magazines, films,
videos, slides, maps, unpublished materials and
electronic materials including websites. The way of
written is follow the APA style format.
* Refers at Appendix 6.

7

8.0 ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

PROJECT SCORE RECORD (100%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE S1: CLASS S1:
SUPERVISOR S2: DATE S2:
NAME S3: S3:
REGISTRATION S1 S2
STUDENT NUMBER
NAME S1 S2

PROPOSAL PRESENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION S1 S2

ITEM CLO ASSESSOR PERCENT S3
(%) S3
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION CLO 1 SUPERVISOR AND S3
DEMONSTRATION 1 CLO 2 ASSESSOR 10
DEMONSTRATION 2 CLO 2
SUPERVISOR 20
SUPERVISOR 20

TOTAL 50

CAPSTONE PROJECT

ITEM CLO ASSESSOR PERCENT
TECHNICAL REPORT CLO 2 (%)
END PRODUCT CLO 2 SUPERVISOR 10
LOG BOOK CLO 1 SUPERVISOR AND
35
ASSESSOR
SUPERVISOR 5
50
TOTAL

ASSESSMENT TASK

ITEM CLO ASSESSOR PERCENT
CLO 3 (%)
LD 3: COMMUNICATION SKILLS CLO 3 10
LD 4: CRITICAL THINKING AND
LD 5: PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS 10
LD 7: SOCIAL SKILLS AND
LD 9: RESPONSIBILITIES CLO 3 SUPERVISOR 10
MANAGEMENT AND CLO 3 10
ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS
LEADERSHIP AND CLO 3 10
TEAMWORK SKILLS

TOTAL 50

8

FINAL PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE (10%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS
SUPERVISOR
NAME DATE

STUDENT S1: REGISTRATION S1:
NAME S2: NUMBER S2:
S3: S3:

PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE

TYPE OF ASSESSMENT STUDENT SCORE S3
S1 S2

SUPERVISOR (A)

ACCESSOR (B)

TOTAL PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE (A + B )
TOTAL PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE (10%)
FORMULA ( (A+B) / 2 )

9

PROPOSAL PRESENTATION (10%) SUPERVISOR
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT ASSESSOR

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014
PROJECT TITLE
SUPERVISOR NAME CLASS

STUDENT NAME DATE

Aspects S1: REGISTRATION S1:
1. Introduction S2: NUMBER S2:
[CLO 1] S3: S3:

2. Problem Statement Proposal Presentation Score Student Score
[CLO 1] S1 S2 S3
3. Objectives 5 4 3 2 1 0
[CLO 1] Always clearly Clearly explains the Sometimes clearly Occasionally Unclear and Vague about the 10
4. Scope explains the project explains the project explains the project incomplete
[CLO 1] to be undertaken project to be to be undertaken to be undertaken understanding of project to be
undertaken most of the project to be undertaken
5. Project Significance
(cannot be measured) the time taken No problem stated
[CLO 1] Vague explanations
Always clearly Clearly explain the Sometimes clearly Occasionally The main objective
explains the problems most of explain the explains the of the problems is not clear
problems problems faced
problems the time The main objective The main objective Do not clarify user
The main objective The main objective The main objective is clear after review. is clear with between system
is very clear during is clear during first needs to be guidance. scope and user
improved Few of the required
first submission. submission. system scope and No clear clarification scope
Most of the between system Do Not state the
Always clearly clarify Clearly clarify required user scope are scope and user project significance
system scope and system scope and included scope
user scope user scope most of system scope and
user scope are Less clear about State very little
the time included project significance about the project

Excellent Very Clear Clear explanations significance
explanation of the explanation of the of project
project significance project significance significance

Aspects Proposal Presentation Score Student Score
6. Literature Review S1 S2 S3
[CLO 1] 5 4 3 2 1 0
7. Methodology The study carried The study carried The study carried The study carried The study carried No evidence stated
[CLO 1] out very clearly out clearly describe out briefly describe out less related out with unclear No correlation with
8. References describe related related evidence related evidence the methodology of
[CLO 1] evidence evidence
evidence Most methodology Methodology used project work.
9. Gantt Chart Methodology associated with Few of methodology Lack of No references
[CLO 1] associated with building projects. associated with methodology was not
10. Cost Planning building projects. building projects. associated with appropriate. No Gantt chart.
[CLO 1] References are References are building projects. Reference does not No cost planning
11. Conclusion References are organized and Reference is not follow APA format. No conclusion.
[CLO 1] significant to project significant to project significant to project significant to the No presentation
12. Presentation and very organized and follow APA and follow APA project but follow Gantt Chart is not
[CLO 1] format. APA format. accurate based on Total Score ( 60 )
with well- format project schedule.
constructed using Gantt Chart is Gantt Chart is less
Gantt Chart is accurate based on accurate based on The project is
APA format. accurate based on project schedule but project schedule. proposed with
Gantt Chart is project schedule but unclearly cost
accurate based on not specific. The project is
project schedule. less specific. The project is proposed with planning
The project is proposed with minimal clarity cost Inappropriate
The project is proposed with good satisfactory cost
proposed with an cost planning planning conclusion.
planning Conclusion is vague. Present with limited
excellent cost Student concludes Student concludes
planning the presentation the presentation Present with ideas
with few points. considerable ideas
Student concludes Present with a Present with some
the presentation moderate degree of
effective ideas
confidently effectiveness and
Present with a high ideas

degree of
effectiveness and

ideas.

Proposal Presentation Score
Formula = ( Total Score / 60 * 10 )

11

DEMONSTRATION I (20%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

STUDENT NAME S1: REGISTRATION S1:
S2: NUMBER S2:
S3: S3:

Aspects Demonstration I Score Student Score

1. Progress of Project 5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
Development 50% complete More than 40% More than 30% More than 20% Less than 10% No progress of project
[CLO 2]
2. Interface/ Structure complete complete complete complete development
Design
[CLO 2] Clearly explain the Able to explain the Explain the project Show the project Project structure No structure design.
3. Content and Concept design of project project structure structure design in structure design design is missing
of Project structure in details. design briefly. general only. without explanations. some elements.
[CLO 2]
4. System Security and The project does The project does offer The project does The project does offer The project does No solution to a
Features/ Exceptional offer 100% solution 80% solution to the offer 60% solution to 40% solution to the offer 20% solution to problem.
Handling to the problem. problem. the problem. problem. the problem.
[CLO 2]
5. Testing Implement a very Implement a clearly Implement a Implement a fairly Implement a poorly No implementation of
[CLO 2] clearly system system moderately system system system system
security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional
Handling Handling Handling Handling Handling Handling

Test cases are very Test cases are clearly Test cases are Test cases are fairly Test cases are poorly No testing
clearly tested with tested with expected moderately tested tested with expected tested with expected
expected output and output and actual with expected output output and actual output and actual
actual output output and actual output output output

Total Score ( 25 )

Demonstration I Score ( 20% )
Formula = ( Total Score / 25 * 20 )

12

DEMONSTRATION II (20%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

STUDENT NAME S1: REGISTRATION S1:
S2: NUMBER S2:
S3: S3:

Aspects Demonstration II Score Student Score
S1 S2 S3
1. Content and Concept 5 4 32 1 0
of Project No project solution
[CLO 2] The project does The project does The project does offer The project does offer The project does
2. Interface/ Structure offer 100% solution offer 80% solution 60% solution to the 40% solution to the offer 20% solution to a problem.
Design problem. problem.
[CLO 2] to the problem. to the problem. to the problem. No project structure
3. Progress of Project Clearly explain the Able to explain the Explain the project Show the project Project structure design.
Development design of project project structure structure design in structure design design is missing
[CLO 2] structure in details. general only. without explanations. some elements. No project
4. System Security and design briefly. More than 50% More than 35% development
Features/ Exceptional 80% complete More than 65% complete complete Less than 25%
Handling complete
[CLO 2] complete
5. Testing
[CLO 2] Implement a very Implement a Implement a Implement a fairly Implement a poorly No implementation
clearly system clearly system moderately system system system of system
security/Exceptional security/Exceptiona security/Exceptional security/Exceptiona security/Exceptional
Handling l Handling security/Exceptional l Handling Handling
Handling Handling
Test cases are very Test cases are Test cases are Test cases are No testing
clearly tested with clearly tested with moderately tested Test cases are fairly poorly tested with
expected output and expected output with expected output tested with expected expected output
actual output and actual output and actual output and actual output
output and actual
output

Total Score (25 )

Demonstration II Score ( 20% )
Formula = ( Total Score / 25 * 20 )

13

FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE (50%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE S1: CLASS S1:
SUPERVISOR S2: DATE S2:
NAME S3: S3:
REGISTRATIO
STUDENT N NUMBER
NAME

CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE

TYPE OF ASSESSMENT CLO ASSESSOR STUDENT SCORE S3
S1 S2

TECHNICAL REPORT (TR) CLO 2 SUPERVISOR

SUPERVISOR

END PRODUCT (EP) CLO 2 ACCESSOR

AVERAGE (A)

LOG BOOK (LB) CLO 1 SUPERVISOR

TOTAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE (TR + EP + LB)

14

FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE
TECHNICAL REPORT (10%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014
PROJECT TITLE
SUPERVISOR NAME CLASS
STUDENT NAME
DATE
Aspects
S1: S1:
1. Abstract
[CLO 2] S2: REGISTRATION S2:
NUMBER
2. Project Plan
[CLO 2] S3: S3:

Technical Report Score Student Score
S1 S2 S3
5 4 3 2 1 0
Describe excellent Describe good Describe clear Describe moderate Describe poor Abstract sentence
and specific abstract abstract sentence abstract sentence abstract sentence abstract sentence
sentence for project for project
problems, purpose, for project for project for project for project problems, purpose,
scope and method, problems, purpose, problems, purpose, problems, purpose, problems, purpose, scope and method,
scope and method, scope and method, scope and method, scope and method,
without with many
grammatical errors. without without with moderate with many grammatical errors.
grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. No explanation of
Very good Clear explanations Vague explanations
explanations of the Moderate Not clear the project.
of the project explanations of the explanations of the of the project.
project
project project

Describe excellent Describe good Describe clear Describe moderate Describe poor Not describe the
and specific sentence for sentence for sentence for sentence for introduction,
sentence for introduction, introduction, introduction, introduction,
introduction, problem statement, problem statement, problem statement, problem statement,
objective, scope, objective, scope, problem statement, objective, scope, objective, scope,
problem statement, literature review, literature review, objective, scope, literature review, literature review,
objective, scope, methodology and methodology and literature review, methodology and methodology and
literature review, Gantt chart. Gantt chart. methodology and Gantt chart. Gantt chart.
methodology and Gantt chart.
Gantt chart.

15

Aspects 5 4 Technical Report Score 1 0 Student Score
All requirements are Only 4 requirements Only 1 requirement No requirement. S1 S2 S3
3. Requirement excellently describe. are clearly describe. 32 is clearly describe.
Specification Only 3 requirements Only 2 requirements
[CLO 2] are clearly describe. are clearly describe. Not clearly shows
4. Final Design and elaborate the
[CLO 2] Excellently defines Very well defines Clearly shows and Moderately shows Not shown and
and shows process and shows process elaborates the and elaborates the design process. elaborate design
5. Test Description and design process. Use unsuitable
Results in design in design design process. testing technique. process.
[CLO 2] Use good testing Use good testing Use suitable testing Use suitable testing No testing
technique and technique and show technique and show technique but not Not clearly list the technique.
6. Major Findings and suitable data. Good clear result after advantages and
Discussions result elaboration. clear result after show clear result disadvantages Do not list the
[CLO 2] testing. testing. after testing. advantages and
7. Conclusions and Excellently list Very well list the Poor elaboration of disadvantages
Recommendations the advantages and advantages and Clearly list the Moderately list the the conclusion and No conclusion and
[CLO 2] disadvantages advantages and advantages and recommendations recommendations
disadvantages Good elaboration of disadvantages disadvantages
8. References Excellent the conclusion and Clear elaboration of Moderate Reference does not No references
[CLO 2] recommendations the conclusion and elaboration of the follow APA format.
elaboration of the recommendations conclusion and
conclusion and References are
organized and References are recommendations
recommendations significant to project significant to project Reference is not
References are and follow APA significant to the
and follow APA project but follow
significant to project format. format.
and very organized APA format.

with well-
constructed using

APA format.

Total Score ( 40 )

Technical Report Score
Formula = ( Total Score / 40*10 )

16

FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE SUPERVISOR
END PRODUCT/ FINAL OUTPUT (35%) ASSESSOR

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014
PROJECT TITLE
SUPERVISOR NAME S1: CLASS
S2:
STUDENT NAME S3: DATE

REGISTRATION S1:
NUMBER S2:
S3:

Aspects End Product/ Final Output Score Student Score
1. Project achievement S1 S2 S3
and objective 5 4 3 2 1 0
[CLO 2] Project is 90% Project is 80% Project is 70% Project is less than No objective 17
2. User Requirements Project is 100% complete and complete and complete and 50% complete and
[CLO 2] complete and achieve most achieve a few achieves only one achieves.
3. Construction and achieve all
functionality achieve all objectives. objectives. objectives. objective.
[CLO 2] objectives and
4. Feasibility exceed expectation. All requirements Several Not more than one Several No requirements
[CLO 2] were met. requirements were requirement was requirements were were met.
All user
requirements have Most of the time met. not met. not met.
describes how the
been met and Sometimes Occasionally Least attempts are No attempt is made
exceeded. system was describes how the describes how the made to describe to describe
constructed and how the system was
Always describes how it functions. system was system was constructed and construction or
effectively how the constructed and constructed and how it functions. functionally.
Clearly how it functions. how it functions. Least communicated No meaningful
system was communicated
constructed and Sometimes Occasionally feasibility of attempt was made
how it functions. feasibility of communicated communicated construction and to develop a
Always clearly construction and implementation.
communicated implementation feasibility of feasibility of solution. Major
most of the time. construction and construction and Major error. error.
feasibility of implementation. implementation.
construction and Minor error.
implementation. No Minor error. Minor error.

errors with
notification.

Aspects End Product/ Final Output Score Student Score
5. Originality S1 S2 S3
[CLO 2] 5 4 3 2 1 0
6. Marketability Product shows an Product shows a Product shows a Uses other people's No originality and
[CLO 2] excellent original moderate amount Uses other people's
good original of original thought. ideas but there is ideas. plagiarism.
7. Creativity thought. thought. little reference of
[CLO 2] Moderate attempt is original thinking. Least attempt is No meaningful
8. System Security, Project Attempt is made to made to Slight attempt is made to attempt is made to
Features and Testing marketability is communicate the made to communicate the
[CLO 2] communicate the communicate the communicate the
clearly device’s device’s device’s device’s project‘s
communicated as to marketability most marketability, how marketability, how
of the time as to, marketability as to this design is marketability, how
how this design is how this design is how this design is this design is this design is
different, better, set different, better, set different, better, set different, better, set different, better, set
apart from what apart from what different, better, set
apart from what apart from what already exists. apart from what apart from what
already exists. already exists. already exists. already exists. already exists.
Good ideas, creative Moderate ideas, Fairly creative ideas Lack of ideas, No creativity
Excellent ideas, and inventive. and inventive creativity and
creative and creative and invention. No implementation
inventive. Good inventive. Poor of user controls and
Excellent implementation of implementation of validation controls
user controls and Moderate Fair implementation user controls and
implementation of validation controls implementation of of user controls and validation controls
user controls and user controls and validation controls
validation controls validation controls

Total Score ( 40 )
End Product/ Final Output Score
Formula = ( Total Score / 40 * 35 )

18

FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE
LOG BOOK (5%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014
PROJECT TITLE
SUPERVISOR’ NAME CLASS
STUDENT NAME
DATE
Aspects
1. Weekly activities S1: S1:
[CLO 1]
S2: REGISTRATION S2:
2. Supervisor NUMBER
signatures
[CLO 1] S3: S3:

Log Book Score Student Score
S1 S2 S3
5 4 3 2 1 0
All 14 weeks of No activity is
activities are More than 12 weeks More than 8 weeks More than 5 weeks Less than 5 weeks of recorded in log
recorded in the log of activities are of activities are of activities are activities are
book.
book. recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log No activity is
All 7 weeks of book. book. book. book. recorded in log
activities are
recorded in the log More than 6 weeks More than 5 weeks More than 4 weeks Less than 3 weeks of book.
of activities are of activities are of activities are activities are No signature of
book. verification of the
Supervisor’s recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log
signature of book. book. book. book. supervisor.
verification is shown
for all 14 weeks. Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s No signature of
signature of signature of signature of signature of verification of the
Supervisor’s verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown
signature of for more than 12 for more than 8 for more than 5 for less than 5 supervisor.
verification is shown
for all 7 weeks. weeks. weeks. weeks. weeks.
Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s
signature of signature of signature of signature of
verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown
for more than 6 for more than 5 for more than 4 for less than 3

weeks. weeks. weeks. weeks.

19

Aspects Log Book Score Student Score
3. Details S1 S2 S3
[CLO 1] 5 4 3 2 1 0
Log book is An appropriate Details are missing, Details are missing No activity done is
4. Neatness Log book is exceptionally amount of detail is and do not illustrate
[CLO 1] exceptionally detailed; provide an used to explain the insufficient the project activities recorded.
detailed, provide an in-depth look into project activities illustration of the
in-depth look into the project project activities are done. The log book is in
the project activities. done. unsatisfactory
activities, and done. The log book is
reflects the The log book is neat. unkempt. The pages condition. It is in
The pages are in The log book is The log book is are in unsatisfactory virtually unreadable
student’s good condition, averagely neat. The relatively neat. The
commitment condition. It is in condition.
The log book is handwriting is neat pages are in pages are in virtually unreadable Handwriting is
exceptionally neat. and some effort has satisfactory, unsatisfactory but illegible. No effort
The pages are in been made to keep readable condition, condition. has been made to
very good condition, handwriting is still in readable Handwriting is keep the logbook
handwriting is neat the log book legible and some condition, illegible. Less effort
and an obvious presentable effort has been has been made to presentable
effort has been made to keep the handwriting is keep the logbook
made to keep the logbook presentable legible and less
effort has been presentable
log book made to keep the
presentable logbook presentable

Total Score ( 20 )

Log Book Score
Formula = ( Total Score / 20 * 5 )

20

OTHER ASSESSMENT TASK (100%)

DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014
PROJECT TITLE CLASS
SUPERVISOR NAME S1: DATE S1:
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
S3: REGISTRATION S3:
Aspects NUMBER
1. Kejelasan Idea 1
[CLO 3] LD 3: COMMUNICATION SKILLS Tidak boleh
menyampaikan idea
2. Kefahaman dan 5 4 Score 2 dan memerlukan Student Score
menjawab soalan Boleh menyampaikan Boleh menyampaikan 3 Boleh menyampaikan S1 S2 S3
[CLO 3] idea dengan sangat Boleh menyampaikan idea dan memerlukan banyak
idea dengan jelas idea dengan jelas penambahbaikan.
jelas. namun memerlukan penambahbaikan Tidak memahami dan
Boleh memahami dan sedikit lanjut. tidak dapat menjawab
Boleh memahami dan menjawab soalan penambahbaikan.
menjawab soalan dengan baik Boleh memahami dan soalan.
dengan cemerlang. Boleh memahami dan menjawab soalan tetapi Total Score ( 10 )
menjawab soalan kurang bertepatan dengan

dengan memuaskan. kehendak soalan.

21

LD 4: CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS

Aspects 5 4 Score 2 1 Student Score
3. Penjanaan Boleh menyelesaikan Boleh menyelesaikan Tidak boleh S1 S2 S3
Penyelesaian masalah atau menawar masalah atau menawar 3 Boleh menyelesaikan menyelesaikan masalah
[CLO 3] penyelesaian alternatif penyelesaian alternatif masalah atau atau menawar
dengan sangat tepat, dengan tepat dan jelas Boleh menyelesaikan menawar penyelesaian alternatif.
4. Integrasi terperinci dan jelas. masalah atau
[CLO 3] tanpa bantuan. menawar penyelesaian alternatif Tidak boleh
Boleh menyatukan penyelesaian dengan bantuan yang menyatukan idea- idea
idea-idea sedia ada dan Boleh menyatukan idea-
idea sedia ada dan boleh alternatif dengan maksimum. sedia ada.
boleh menghasilkan sedikit bantuan. Boleh menyatukan
penyelesaian baharu menghasilkan Boleh menyatukan idea-idea sedia ada
penyelesaian baharu idea-idea sedia ada tetapi tidak boleh
dengan
sangat jelas. dengan jelas. dan boleh menghasilkan
menghasilkan penyelesaian baharu.
penyelesaian baharu
dengan bantuan.

Total Score ( 10 )

LD 5: SOCIAL SKILLS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Aspects 5 Score 3 2 1 Student Score
5. Menghormati orang Menunjukkan rasa hormat dan 4 Tiada sensitiviti S1 S2 S3
lain penghargaan yang tinggi kepada Menunjukkan rasa hormat dan Menunjukkan Kurang terhadap hak
[CLO 3] penghargaan kepada hak dan sensitiviti sensitiviti dan keperluan 22
hak dan keperluan individu keperluan individu lain terhadap hak
6. Sumbangan kepada terhadap hak dan dan keperluan individu lain.
masyarakat 1. Sangat bertanggungjawab dan 1. Bertanggungjawab dan keperluan individu lain.
[CLO 3] sentiasa mengambil inisiatif untuk sentiasa mengambil inisiatif untuk Mengambil Kurang inisiatif
melibatkan diri dalam komuniti. melibatkan diri dalam komuniti. individu lain. inisiatif untuk dan tidak
Bertanggungjawa melibatkan
2. Mampu berperanan aktif 2. Mampu berperanan sebagai b dan mengambil diri dalam berminat untuk
sebagai agen perubahan (seperti agen perubahan (seperti komuniti melibatkan diri
menjaga, memperbaiki, inisiatif untuk apabila
menjaga, memperbaiki, melibatkan diri diminta dalam
menstabilkan nilai moral dan menstabilkan nilai moral dan dalam komuniti komuniti.
norma) dalam komuniti. pada tahap yang
norma) dalam komuniti. memuaskan.

Total Score ( 10 )

LD 7: MANAGEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS

Aspects 5 4 Score 2 1 Student Score
7. Organisasi Idea Menyampaikan idea Menyampaikan idea Menyampaikan idea S1 S2 S3
[CLO 3] dengan cara yang amat dengan cara yang jelas, 3 Menyampaikan idea dengan cara yang tidak
jelas, padu dan teratur. dengan cara yang jelas, padu dan teratur.
8. Peluang padu dan teratur. Menyampaikan idea
keusahawanan Mengupayakan idea dengan cara yang kurang jelas, padu dan Tiada idea untuk
[CLO 3] menjadi peluang Idea perniagaan adalah teratur. penambahan nilai /
mengikut strategi jelas dan memenuhi sederhana jelas, padu penyelesaian masalah /
perniagaan dan kehendak / keperluan dan teratur. Mempunyai kehendak / keperluan
pelanggan. idea penambahan nilai
memenuhi kehendak Idea perniagaan / penyelesaian masalah pelanggan.
/ keperluan adalah jelas tetapi
pelanggan. tidak memenuhi yang tidak jelas dan Total Score ( 10 )
kehendak / keperluan tidak relevan dengan
kehendak / keperluan
pelanggan.
pelanggan.

LD 9: LEADERSHIP AND TEAMWORK SKILLS

Aspects 5 4 Score 2 1 Student Score
9. Kepimpinan Boleh memimpin S1 S2 S3
Berkesan Mempamerkan bukti anggota kumpulan 3 Boleh memimpin anggota Tiada bukti jelas
[CLO 3] jelas kebolehan sehingga projek kumpulan sehingga kebolehan
mencapai objektif Boleh memimpin anggota
10. Menghormati dan memimpin anggota dengan berkesan kumpulan sehingga projek mencapai objektif memimpin anggota
Menerima Pendapat kumpulan dengan tetapi dengan kesan yang kumpulan secara
[CLO 3] berkesan dalam Menghormati dan projek mencapai objektif terhad dan memerlukan berkesan dalam
mencapai objektif. menerima dengan dengan berkesan yang mencapai objektif.
Menghormati dan baik pendapat ahli baik dan memerlukan penambahbaikan.
menerima dengan sedikit penambahbaikan. Kurang menghormati Tidak menunjukkan
sangat baik pendapat kumpulan bagi dan menerima pendapat rasa hormat dan
ahli kumpulan bagi mencapai objektif. Menghormati dan ahli kumpulan alam tidak menerima
mencapai objektif. menerima pendapat ahli pendapat anggota
kumpulan bagi mencapai mencapai objektif
kumpulan. kumpulan sehingga
objektif. menimbulkan konflik.

Total Score ( 10 )

23

Appendix i

i. Proposal Guidelines

Table 3.0 : Proposal Guidelines

No Topic / Chapter Description

1.0 Introduction Always clearly explains the project to be undertaken.
Always clearly explains the problems.
2.0 Problem Statement The main objective is very clear during first submission.
Always clearly clarify system scope and user scope.
3.0 Objectives
Excellent explanation of the project significance.
4.0 Scope The study carried out very clearly describes related
evidence.
5.0 Project Significance Methodology associated with building projects.
(cannot be measured) References are significant to project and very organized
with well-constructed using APA format.
6.0 Literature Review Chart is accurate based on project schedule.
The project is proposed with an excellent cost planning.
7.0 Methodology Student concludes the presentation confidently

8.0 References

9.0 Gantt Chart
10.0 Cost Planning
11.0 Conclusion

24

Appendix ii

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION &
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

DIPLOMA IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
(DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY)

AN IMPLEMENTATION OF IPV6 IN WIRELESS NETWORK
ENVIRONMENT

GROUP MEMBERS

NORADILAH BINTI SUKOR 25DDT16F1001

MAS AYU BINTI MOHD ARIFF 25DDT16F1002

RUZANNA BINTI ABU BAKAR 25DDT16F1003

SUPERVISOR
ZALEHA BINTI SALAMON

SESSION : DECEMBER 2018

25

Appendix iii

iii. Task Summaries

Table 4.0: Task Summaries

TASK

No Person In Charge Task Description
1. Student 1 - State all the tasks has been in charged by

2. Student 2 Student 1
- State all the tasks has been in charged by
3. Student 3
Student 2
- State all the tasks has been in charged by

Student 3

** Task summaries are based on allocating project scopes among group members.

Verified by :

............ ...................................................
( SUPERVISOR NAME )

26

Appendix iv

iv. Testing

Table 5.0 : Unit Testing Plan (UTP)

UNIT TESTING PLAN (UTP)

No. Test Case Test Pre- Expected Tester Result
Name Procedure condition Result Adriana (Pass /
Failure)
1. Login User is User need to + case Pass
2. required to register or Prompt
fill the sign up notification
username before login. successful
and login!
password
field before
access the
system

*Expected result will be based on the test name procedure.

Table 6.0 : Integration Testing Plan (ITP)

INTEGRATION TESTING PLAN (ITP)

No. Test Case Test Pre- Expected Tester Result
Name Procedure condition Result (Pass /
Failure)
1. Login User is None User will Pass
required to directly go to
click submit homepage Adriana
button. system after
login.

2.

*Expected result will be based on the test name procedure.

Table 7.0 : User Acceptance Testing (UAT)

USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING (UAT)

No. Test Case Acceptance Requirement Test Result Tester Comments
Name User is required to fill in the Pass Fail Fifdil (Comments are
username and password Pass given by a client)
1. Login before access the system

2.

*Expected result will be based on the test name procedure.

27

v. Compliance and Auditing / Checklist Form Appendix v

Table 8.0: Server Vulnerability & Handling Yes No
SERVER VULNERABILITY & HANDLING
√
No Remarks
1. Do you used automated tools to assess system vulnerabilities
2.

* Subtitle and remarks are depends on type of project.

28

Appendix vi

vi. References

Book
Barnard, R., de Luca, R., & Li, J. (2015). First-year undergraduate students’ perceptions of

lecturer and peer feedback: A New Zealand action research project. Studies In Higher
Education, 40(5), 933-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881343

Ebook
Miller,L. (2008). Careers for nature lovers & other outdoor types. Retrieve from

http://www.ebscohost.com

Website
Nafees, Q., Yilong, Y., Andras, N., Zhiming, L., & Janos, S. (2014, November 19). Anonymously

analyzing clinical data sets. Retrieve from http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05916

Magazine
Jackson, P. (2011, March 1). Navy Yard Hill and the founding of Washington City. Capitol Hill

Historian, 2, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1068/20113

Journal
Dumais, S. A., Rizzuto, T. E., Cleary, J., & Dowden, L. (2013). Stressors and supports for adult

online learners: Cmparing first- and continuing-generation college students. American
Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 100-110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.783265

Streaming Video
Heffernan, M. (2015, May). Margaret Heffernan: Why it’s time to forget the pecking order at

work [video file]. Retrieved from
https://www.ted.com/talks/margaret_heffernan_why_it_s_time_to_forget_the_pecki
ng_order_at_work

Interview
Cloyd,A. (2018, July 29). Personal Interview.

29



Scan this QR Code to view e-book