The words you are searching are inside this book. To get more targeted content, please make full-text search by clicking here.

Con Edison Service Territory • 660 sq. mile service territory • 133,000 miles of T&D cable • 76,000 people/sq. mile • 2,000 MW/sq. mile at peak

Discover the best professional documents and content resources in AnyFlip Document Base.
Search
Published by , 2016-07-10 22:27:03

Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs

Con Edison Service Territory • 660 sq. mile service territory • 133,000 miles of T&D cable • 76,000 people/sq. mile • 2,000 MW/sq. mile at peak

Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs
July 2011

1

Con Edison Service Territory

• 660 sq. mile service territory
• 133,000 miles of T&D cable
• 76,000 people/sq. mile
• 2,000 MW/sq. mile at peak
• Over 3.3 million unique electric, gas

and steam accounts; serve about
10 million people

• Over 600,000,000 sq. ft. of office

space

• 421,000 businesses
• 900,000 residential buildings
• 58 billion kWh of electric

consumption

2

Electric System Efficiency

Generation Transmission Customers

Large Gas & Distribution Incandescent
Turbine Lighting
Transmission
31% 8-12%
98.8%

Fossil Fuel Room Air
Conditioners
33%
15-30%

Combined Distribution Commercial
Cycle Refrigeration
96.5%
45% 55%

ERRP Commercial
HVAC
68%
65%
Average Efficiency
33% Average Efficiency Average Efficiency
93% 15-45%

Natural Gas Consumption Breakdown
Residential

1 – 4 units 5+ units

Applian ces Misc Misc
7% 1% 1%

Space Cooling Cooking
2% 14%

Water Heating
19%

Water Heating Space Heating
25% 58%

Space Heating
73%

Space and water heating are predominant uses

4

Customer Attitude Study Results:

• Residential Interest: highest among condo/coop owners (49%) and 1-4 family homes (35%)
• Commercial Interest: 38% of commercial customers have high level of interest

• Factors driving interest:
– Want to help the environment (32%)
– Want to lower future bills (20%)
– Want rebates/incentives (26%)

• Customer Expectations:
– Participate in simple programs
– Knowledge of cost savings, rebates, and payback
– Individualized support from project start to finish

5

Multi-family Energy Efficiency Program

Overview:

– Building and units receive an energy survey showing eligible

energy conservation measures and savings.

– Owner receives financial incentives for upgrading to energy efficient

efficient equipment that is cost effective.

– Participating building’s residents receive free installs

(including CFLs, smart strip, showerhead, and faucet aerator).

• Eligible Customers:

– Owners or managers of multi-family buildings with 5-75 units (including

rent-controlled, rent-stabilized, market-rate rentals, co-ops, and condos).

– Must be a Con Edison customer for either firm gas or electric

• Contractor:

– The Association for Energy Affordability (AEA)

6

Energy Management Systems

7

Incentive

Measure Incentive
Energy Management System 70% of installed cost up to $20,000

Annual energy savings 2,000 therms
1st year dollar savings
$2,700
Installed cost $14,500
Payback 5.4 years
Incentive $10,150
Customer payback 1.6 years

* Based on a 61 unit building in Manhattan currently under renovations

8

minimum system requirements: 9

1. Must satisfy total resource cost calculation.
2. Remote access and monitoring capabilities via web
3. Apartment sensors in 25% of units (no less than 5)
4. Outdoor reset capability
5. Feedback sensors:

Stack temperature sensor
DHW temperature sensor
Outdoor temperature sensor
Supply or return water temperature sensor (for Hot Water systems)
Condensate return temperature sensor (for Steam systems)

6. Perform boiler staging for multiple boiler systems.

Program Statistics on EMS

• 11 systems installed
• 44 systems under contract
• $125,000 in incentives
• 10%-15% realized energy savings

10

Building X in the Bronx

17 units

1800 PRE
1600 POST
1400
1200 April
1000
Therms 11

800
600
400
200

0

January February March

2010 / 2011

Building Y in Manhattan

36 units

6000 PRE
5000 POST
4000
Therms 3000 April
2000
1000 12

0

January February March

2010 / 2011

EMS w/ Monitoring Contract

Portfolio Average Realized
12 Buildings in Brooklyn Energy Savings
1 (all gas)
13 Buildings in Bronx/Manhattan 14.2%
2 (11 oil , 2 gas)
19.2%

*Data courtesy of Dan Carleton, Heat Watch LLC.

13

Market Barriers

• Technophobia
• Strict Cost Effectiveness Standards

14

Behavioral Impact on EMS

• Education of building manager
• Commitment to using the system and responding properly

to alerts

• How often does the super bypass the system?

• A monitoring contract may be needed!

15

Department of Public Services Regulation

Benefits Costs
• EUL = 15 years • Full installed cost
• Administrative cost of
• $ value of NET therm savings 25% of incentive
over EUL (NTG = 90%)
16
• savings devalued each year
using LRAC scale and 5.5%
discount rate.

• CO2 offset at $0.09/therm
($15/ton of CO2)

Total Resource Cost Examples:

35 unit building 10 unit building

therm savings 3,100 900

installed cost $14,700 $12,800

Benefits NPV $42,850 $12,250

Costs NPV $15,550 $13,550

TRC 2.76 0.9

Threshold Building Size = 15 units

17

Research Needs

• Increasing the cost effectiveness of EMS

- adding lighting control, motor control
- raise energy befits with minimal cost increase

• Study building’s commitment to using EMS

- quantify the added benefit of using professional
monitoring service.

18

QUESTIONS?

19

Multi-family Energy Efficiency Program

Gregory Elcock CEM CEA CBCP Phil Madnick CEA BEP BPI
BEP Assistant Program Manager
Program Manager 212-460-6741
212-460-6507 [email protected]
[email protected]

Implementation Contractor:

– The Association for Energy Affordability (AEA)
– 1-877-634-9443 or www.aeanyc.org/conedmultifamily

20


Click to View FlipBook Version