Harvesting • Reaper • Whole plant thresher • Maize header for combine • Maize combine • Dehusker cum sheller • Small sheller for tribal & hilly areas Mobile maize dryer Approach 3: Scale Appropria of CHCS a Planting: Plant stand is key • Bed planter: low & high rainfall areas • Pneumatic planter: to increase crop stand & reduce seed cost • Roller planter: small holders Intercultivator: Tractor operated
ate Mechanization- Creation and Hubs • Seed to seed mechanization: 100 acre inTelangana • Saving of Rs. 5100/ha in sowing & Rs. 1500/ha seed cost Back to Annexure
98 acre in 5 districts of Punjab & 49 acre in 3 districts of Haryana Farmer readiness is there but inter-district and inter Can achieve up to 7.5 t/ha yield of maize but out Approach 4: Participato Creation of kn 36 56 73 58 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Grain yield(q/ha) Dist Av. Demo Av. Demo Max. Padd
Planting good seed with best method Frequent visits Field days r-farmer variation is high –hand holding is needed. t scaling BMP and price realization is key. ory Innovation Platform: owledge hubs 28 62 75 46 y yld Back to Annexure
Approach 5: Awareness • To disseminate best management practices a profitability and resource sustainability • To popularize alternate maize-based avenu development and livelihood security • Capacity development of farmers, extension maize production and value chain • To mobilize farmers into groups, incuba stakeholders.
s and Capacity building and hybrids in maize to enhance productivity, ues with speciality corn for entrepreneurship officers and other stakeholders to strengthen ate and facilitate linkages with different Back to Annexure
Economics: Maize in East Maize (Variety) Paddy (Variety) Area (ha) Topography (Upland/ midland) Locati (villag district, s Maize Paddy West Bengal CP838 MTU7029 20 10 Upland Jhargra Odisha (k Kalinga Raj MTU1010 42.4 1.6 Medium/ upland Nabar’ Mayurbh Gajap Jharkhand DHM-117 Gora Dhan 12.6 11 Upland Burm Chanh Uttarakhand DKC9108 PANT RICE 10, Noori 20 20 Irrigated Udha Singh Na
tern India & Uttarakhand on ge, state) Yield (q/ha) Average selling price (Rs/q) Net returns (Rs/ha) @ farmers’ selling price Maize Paddy Maize Paddy Maize Paddy l (kharif) am, 94.1 29.4 800 1500 40395 7,020 kharif) pur, hanj, ati 52.53 32.23 2050 2040 68041 25239 (kharif) mu, ho 55.12 28.5 1870 1940 67532 30487 d (spring) m agar 87 80 1800 1600 117244 83648 Back to Annexure
Maize-based Learning platforms Enahnced SCH and BMP Capacity building programme Awarness programme Adisory support Lietrature/video in regional language PPP in seed production CSR fund Ethanol plant-producer linkages Machinery hub-producer linkages Roadmap for maize f Scaling up BMP Partnership & linkages Holistic interventio Corn-based Ethan
Bioethanol Creation of regional seed hubs in Eastern, IGP, Central & Hill ecologies PPP Farmer parcipatory approach Ethnol industry partnership feed stock in ethanol Seed Production Research ons to promote ol value chains Potential acreage in industry catchment Hybrids to improve productivity in rainfed ecology Hybrid with high ethanol recovery & better DDGS Sustainable PoP in new and traditional ecologies Back to Annexure
Enabling Policies: Poultry D
Diversifying to Alternatives • Assured price and procurement • Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for Kharif, Rabi and Spring Maize separately • Drying facilities at farm gate/ village level/ mandi gate Back to Annexure
Researcha Speed breeding for development of varie Evaluation of high ethanol producing ge Enrichment of DDGS feedstock quality Standardization of corn quality grades Shelf-life considerations for Bioethanol Optimization of thermochemical and en delignification Creation of Agri-innovation platforms fo
able Issues Variability of selected maize hybrids for ethanol fermentability, done on laboratory scale. eties notypes zymatic r PoPs Back to Annexure
Sugarcane and Sugar Sec part No intermediaries involved. Direct payment to farmers bank accou Robust database and software/ Fair le Detailed supply scheduling. Seamless engagement with farmers r Agri Inputs support/ machines to farm Support to farmers in harvesting (in ce
ctor: Mills and Farmers are ners unts. evel of Digitalization. round the year. mers in sugarcane cultivation. ertain states) and transportation. Back to Annexure
Spatial distance of 15 KMs between fac Defined catchment area (in certain sta farmers Price notified by Centre and State Gov lead to loyalty to crop Assured off-take of entire produce – r Regulatory Provisions in Su
ctories – Assured supply of cane ates) – Long term relations with vernments – Fair margins for farmers isk free cultivation ugarcane and Sugar Sector Back to Annexure
Enabling Ecosystem – Mult in Use of ICT for smart farm Input supply to farmers Drip Irrigation Mech Mechanization on Custom Hire Villages Cov Cane Area Farmers rea (Temasek Holdings) Subject Extension Infra Suppo Bio Con Suvidha Ken E-Suvidha App
ti Stakeholders Partnership Increasing the ncome of farmers hanization vered - 2312 a - 178K Ha ach - 250K Implementation Partner Project Lead & Advisory Varietal Improvement t Experts – 7 workers – 300 ort : Soil Labs – 4 ntrol Labs – 2 ndra – Call Centre p– One Stop Solution Back to Annexure
Framework for sustain Sustainab produ Industry 1. Developing effective extension program 2. Providing support to farmersinputs/machine 3. Demonstrating /promoting Package of Practices 4. Creating Partnerships 5. Leveraging Govt. schemes 6. Procurement & storage infrastructure Govt./Polic 1. Developing mechan at distillery gate 2. Price parity between
able maize production ble Maize uction ICAR / IIMR etc 1. Breeding program - Promising varieties suiting industry requirements 2. Developing Good Agriculture Practices 3. Developing suitable machines 4.Precision Farming Technologies –AI/ ML cy support nism for procurement n corn and ethanol Back to Annexure
U.S Corn Pro Usage: Lesso
oduction & ons for India Back to Annexure
0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 US Corn Production, Use and Ending Stocks (MMT) Production Feed… Ethanol & DDGS Total Dom… Ending… • U.S. has produced enough corn to me feed, ethanol, starch and exports as w • Feed demand has remained consiste Source: WASDE (USDA), Apr 2023 U.S. Corn Produ
eet its own requirements for food, well as enough ending stocks. nt. Added use – ethanol 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Domestic Use (Billion Bushels) Year Ethanol Use uction and Use Back to Annexure
U.S. Corn Area a 45.7255.8871.1273.66 106.68 167.64177.80 251.46 314.96 345.95358.42382.88 348.74 42.11 36.0333.6032.79 27.13 34.01 29.9632.39 35.6336.3036.7137.7635.86 1.29 1.81 2.40 3.43 4.54 5.71 7.43 8.59 9.59 10.5110.7611.0910.88 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2019 2020 2021 (E ) 2022 ( P ) US Corn Production, Area and Productivity Production (MMT) Area (Mill Hac) Productivity (MT/Hac) Producing more from less • Over the years the area under corn has come d • Ethanol production jumped in 2000 and U.S. far production and fulfil other needs as well. • 2023 Planting intentions are for 37.23 million ha Source: WASDE (USDA), Apr 2023
and Productivity down and productivity has increased. rmers produced enough corn to continue ethanol ac, up 4% from 2022 Back to Annexure
U.S. Ethanol Produc 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 Ethanol Production (000 glns/week), % of Gasoline and Imports (000 glns/day) ETHANOL SUPPLY Production 4-Week Avg. (000 gal./yr) ETHANOL SUPPLY Imports (000 gal./day) Capacity 65.87 billion lts Production : 58.212 billion lts (2022)
ction and Locations Source: WASDE (USDA) and Renewable Fuels Association Back to Annexure
Common Thread in Cor Dry Milling
rn Processing : STARCH Wet Milling Back to Annexure
Components of Y • Starch 72.6 % Corn Oil 4.3 % Protein 9.8 % NDF 9.0 % Minerals 1.6 %
Yellow Dent Corn (7.7 kg) of DDGS (7.7 kg) of CO2 (10.67 lit ) of Ethanol Back to Annexure
1. Genetics 2. Environment 3. Post Harvest Practices (Drying, Transportation and Storage) Export Elevat Quality Factors Affe
tor ecting Milling Yields Hard Endosperm Soft Endosperm Back to Annexure
Starch Extractability – StudChampaig
dy at University of Urbanagn, Illinois Back to Annexure
Comparison with Ot Indian corn is a hard endosperm corn and the starch extractability is low, whe increase is starch extractability for a 1000 MT/day grind, the extra revenue is Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Director, Integrated Bioprocessing Re
ther Origins and U.S. ereas US corn is soft endosperm, starch is easily extractable. For every 1% s USD 1.1 million/year (As per the data from the Dr.Vijay Singh, Professor, esearch Laboratory Back to Annexure
THAN
NK YOU Back to Annexure
Moderator/Coordinator: 1. Shri Narendra Mohan, Director, N Panelists: 1. Dr. HS Jat, Director, Indian Institut 2. Shri Mahesh Kulkarni, AVP, Praj In 3. Shri Sanjay Desai, CMD, Regreen National Seminar o SESSI RECOVERY OF ETPRODUCTS F
ational Sugar Institute Kanpur te of Maize Research, Ludhiana dustries Ltd. Excel EPC India Pvt. Ltd. on Maize & Ethanol ON II: THANOL AND BYFROM MAIZE Back to Annexure
OUTLINE OF P 1. Outline of maize based ethanol produ 2. Important areas for maximizing effici cost of production. 3. Best Available Technologies & Standa 4. Benchmarking of Efficiency Paramete 5. By-product utilization. 6. Way forward-Waste to Resource.
PRESENTATION uction process. ency for higher ethanol yield and reducing ard Operating Procedures. ers. Back to Annexure
FLOW CHART OF TYPICA ETH
AL CORN/MAIZE DRY GRIND HANOL Back to Annexure
For the given quality of maize, yield of etha production is dependent upon: 1. Conversion Efficiency 2. Fermentation Efficiency 2. Distillation Efficiency 4. De-hydration Efficiency 5. Requirement of Utilities- steam & power re water with-drawl and treatment cost. 6. Revenues through better by-product and 7. Possibilities of 1.5G ethanol using fiber alon ethanol production. IMPORTANT AREAS FOR MA HIGHER ETHANOL YIELD A PRODU
anol & cost of equirement, fresh waste management. ng with starch for AXIMIZING EFFICIENCY FOR AND REDUCING COST OF UCTION Back to Annexure