Psychosocial I
Bipolar
Jenifer L. C
Stanford
Interventions for
Disorder
Culver, PhD
University
“At this point in my existence, I
normal life without both taking l
benefit of psychotherapy. Lithiu
disastrous highs, diminishes my
wool and webbing from my diso
from ruining my career and rela
hospital, alive, and makes psych
ineffably, psychotherapy heals.
confusion, reins in the terrifying
some control and hope and poss
But, always, it is where I have b
believe – that I might someday
this.”
cannot imagine leading a
lithium and having had the
um prevents my seductive but
y depressions, clears out the
ordered thinking…keeps me
ationships, keeps me out of
hotherapy possible. But,
It makes some sense of the
g thoughts and feelings, returns
sibility of learning from it all…
believed – or have learned to
be able to contend with all of
Kay Jamison
An Unquiet Mind
2
Treatment of B
• Basic goals of treatm
– Alleviate acute mood
– Restore psychosocia
– Prevent relapse of m
• Psychopharmacology
treatment
• Relapse and subsynd
may occur even with
treatment
Bipolar Disorder
ment:
d symptoms
al functioning
mood episodes
gy as foundation of
ndromal symptoms
h optimal medication
3
Targets of P
Interventions in
• Psychoeducation abou
its treatment
• Medication understand
• Social and work functi
• Recognition of early w
early intervention
• Reduce impact of psyc
related to relapse
Psychosocial
Bipolar Disorder
ut bipolar disorder and
ding and adherence
ioning
warning symptoms and
chosocial factors
4
Evidence-Base
Treatments for B
• Psychoeducation
• Family-focused the
• Interpersonal and s
• Cognitive-behavior
*Zaretsky A. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5:80-87.
ed Psychosocial
Bipolar Disorder
erapy
social rhythm therapy
ral therapy
5
Psychoe
• Provides informatio
disorder and treatm
• Teaches early-warn
recognition and cop
relapse
• Individual, group, or
• Key element across
psychotherapies for
education
on about bipolar
ment
ning symptom
ping skills to prevent
r family formats
s all evidence-based
r bipolar disorder
6
Effects of Psy
Results from controlled
• Longer time to manic relap
• Increased knowledge of a
pharmacotherapy2
• Fewer hospitalizations,3,4
• Fewer relapsed patients, f
patient4
• Longer time to depressive
mixed recurrence4
1Perry A, et al. BMJ. 1999;318:149-152; 2Peet M
200; 3Cochran SD. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984
Psychiatry. 2003;60:402-407; 5Colom F, et al. Bip
ychoeducation
studies:
apse, fewer manic relapses1
and improved attitude toward
shorter hospitalizations4,5
fewer recurrences per
e, manic, hypomanic, and
M, Harvey NS. Br J Psychiatry. 1991;158:197- 7
4;52:873-878; 4Colom F, et al. Arch Gen
ipolar Disord. 2004;6:294-298.
Psychoeducatio
Adjunctive Maint
% of Patients Remaining Well 100
Psyc
• Tim
80 • Num
• Num
60
40
N=120
20 P<.003
0 6 12
0
Time to Recurren
Colom F, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:40
on Is an Effective
tenance Therapy
choeducation Superior to Control for:
me to recurrence (graph)
mber of relapsed patients
mber of recurrences/patient
18 21-week
Psychoeducation
nce (months) Group
21-week
Nonstructured
Group
24
02-407. 8
Family Tr
• High expressed emotio
increased risk of relap
in bipolar disorder1
• Miklowitz and colleagu
focused therapy, which
in schizophrenia, for u
1Miklowitz DJ, et al. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1986
1990;18:17-28; 3Clarkin JF, et al. Psychiatr Serv
J Affect Disord. 1991;21:15-18;
reatments
ion is associated with
pse and poor outcomes
ues adapted family-
ch has been successful
use in bipolar disorder
6;22:628-632; 2Clarkin JF, et al. J Affect Disord.
v. 1998;49:531-533; 4van Gent EM & Zwart FM.
9
Family-Focus
• Assessment of family
• Psychoeducation abou
(symptoms, early reco
treatment, self-manag
• Communication skills t
rehearsal of effective s
strategies)
• Problem-solving skills
Miklowitz DJ, Goldstein MJ. Bipolar Disorder: A
Guilford Press; 1997.
sed Treatment
or couple
ut bipolar disorder
ognition, etiology,
gement)
training (behavioral
speaking and listening
training
Family-Focused Treatment Approach. New York:
10
FFT + Medication Dela
Crisis Managemen
1.0
Cumulative Survival Rate 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2 FFT + medication
CM + medication
0.0
0 10 20 30 40
Weeks
Mean survival = FFT, 73.5 weeks; CM, 53.2 wee
Miklowitz DJ, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60
ays Relapse More Than
nt (CM) + Medication
(N=101)
p = .003
n
50 60 70 80 90 100 110
s of Follow-up
eks. 11
0:904-912.
Interpersonal an
Therapy
• Integrates:
– Psychoeducation
– Social rhythm therap
rhythms (eg, sleep, s
modifying routines
– Interpersonal psycho
quality of interperson
satisfaction with soci
nd Social Rhythm
(IPSRT)
py – to regulate social
social) by monitoring and
otherapy – to improve
nal relationships and
ial roles
12
Social Rhythm Metric ScoreIPSRT Increases
Rhythms O
6
5
4
3
2
0 10 20 30
Weeks
ICM = intensive clinical management.
Frank E, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;41:1165-117
Stability of Social
Over Time
P=.006 IPSRT
(n=18)
ICM
(n=20)
40 50 60 70 80 13
ks of Treatment
73.
Cognitive Beha
• Psychoeducation
• Enhancing Medication C
• Monitoring of mood and
• Monitor behavior to prev
(e.g., routine and sleep)
• Challenge thoughts and
mood disturbance
• Dealing with long-term v
Lam DH, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:14
avioral Therapy
Compliance 14
d early warning signs
vent mood escalation
)
d beliefs contributing to
vulnerability issues
45-152.
CBT Effective for B
and Relapse
• In early controlled stud
(vs meds alone) yielde
– Fewer
• Relapses1,2
• Hospitalizations2,3
• Subsyndromal fluctua
– Improved
• Medication adherence
• Global functioning1
• Social functioning2
• Coping with depressio
1Scott J, et al. Psychol Med. 2001;31:459-467; 2L
503-520; 3Cochran SD. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1
Bipolar Depression
e Prevention
dies, CBT plus meds
ed:
ations2 15
e1,2
on and mania prodromes2
Lam DH, et al. Cognit Ther Res. 2000;24:
1984;52:873-878.
Adjunctiv
Enhanced Outcome
60
% of Patients With Events 50
40
30
20
10
0 Mania
Depression (P<.002)
(P<.001)
Lam DH, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:145
ve CBT
es Over 12 Months
CBT + medication
management
Medication
management
Mixed Admission
5-152. (P<.003)
16
Mean Days in Episode Adjunctive CB
Days in Bipo
End of
45
40
35 CBT + medica
management
30 Medication ma
25
P<.01
20
15
10
5
0
Intention to Treat
Lam DH, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:145
BT Decreases
olar Episodes
f therapy
ation CBT group had
anagement fewer days in bipolar
episodes (p<.01)
even after covarying
for number of
previous episodes.
5-152. 17
Future D
Dialectical Beh
• Skills Modules
– Distress Tolerance
– Emotion Regulation
– Interpersonal Effectiv
• Format of group
– Lecture
– Didactic discussion
– Homework
– Mood monitoring
Directions:
havior Therapy?
veness
18
Stanford DBT
• Retrospective chart re
receiving DBT skills gr
– Decreased
• Days with sadness
• Days with anhedoni
• Severity of anhedon
• Distractibility
– Increased:
• GAF scores
Culver et al. (2005)
T Skills Group
eview (n=16) of patients
roup at Stanford:
ia
nia
19
Which T
• Almost all studies sho
psychosocial intervent
• No definitive evidence
• Therapies overlap in t
• Treatment choice influ
– Patient choice
– Availability of therapist
– Individual characteristic
Therapy?
owed some benefit of
tions
e comparing key therapies
targets for change
uenced by:
t
ics
20
Where to
• Psychoeducation
– Consider asking your
therapist and/or
psychiatrist for more
education about the
disorder
– Read structured
psychoeducational
materials
to Start?
21
Where to
• Monitoring of mood sym
– NIMH Lifechart availab
www.bipolarnews.org
(click on “Lifecharting”)
• Plan for early interventio
– Work with your therapis
develop a plan to help y
warning symptoms and
to Start?
mptoms
ble online at:
g
)
on
st and/or psychiatrist to
you recognize early
d take action
22
23
24
Conclu
• Even with optimal pharm
with bipolar disorder ma
symptoms and/or proble
functioning
• Adjunctive psychosocial
clinical outcomes and ps
• Structured, evidence-ba
helpful even when mood
usions
macotherapy, individuals
ay have subsyndromal
ems with psychosocial
l treatments can improve
sychosocial functioning
ased therapy can be
d is stable
25