rpms ppst

KRA 2: Learning Environment

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION QET Outstanding
(5)
8. Applied a SET A Quality
range of Any supplementary material Applied effective
successful (in print/digital format) made teaching
strategies that by the ratee* and used in the strategies that are
maintain lesson delivery that highlights a well-aligned with
learning range of strategies that maintain the learning goals
environments learning environments that and successfully
that motivate motivate learners to work motivate learners
learners to productively by assuming to monitor and
work responsibility for their own evaluate their own
productively learning learning as shown
by assuming in the submitted
responsibility ● one lesson from a self- learning material
for their own learning module (SLM)
learning Demonstrated
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, Level 7 in
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Objective 8 as
lesson exemplars, and the shown in COT
likes) rating sheets / inter-
observer
● video lesson or audio agreement forms
lesson that is SLM-based
or MELC-aligned

● other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide
annotations)

SET B
Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet or inter-
observer agreement form
obtained from an observation of
a video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned (please provide
annotations of one’s contribution
to the video lesson)

*If the supplementary material is a product of a group work / collaborative effort of two (2) or more
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) No acceptable
evidence was
Applied effective Applied an Applied teaching shown

teaching effective teaching strategy/ies that

strategies that are strategy that is is/are partially

well-aligned with well-aligned with aligned with the

the learning goals the learning goal/s learning goal/s and

and successfully and successfully only somehow

motivate learners motivates learners motivate/s

to work to work learners to work

productively by productively by productively by

assuming assuming assuming

responsibility for responsibility for responsibility for

their own learning their own learning their own learning

as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the

submitted learning submitted learning submitted learning

material material material

Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
Objective 8 as Objective 8 as Objective 8 as Objective 8 as
shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
observer observer observer observer
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms

or

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

e teachers, ratee should specify and provide annotations of one’s contribution to a material.

11

Note for SET A: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing
RPMS rating. See sample computation below:

Means of Verification RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
MOV 1: Lesson plan
MOV 2: One lesson from an SLM 3 4
(Very Satisfactory)
4

Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing
(ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sam

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 1
COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
5 3

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g the rating for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

g the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;
mple computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

12

KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION (5)
Quality
9. Designed, SET A Demonstrated
adapted and Classroom observation Level 7 in
implemented tool (COT) rating sheet or Objective 9 as
teaching inter-observer agreement shown in COT
strategies that form obtained from an rating sheets /
are responsive observation of a video inter-observer
to learners lesson or audio lesson that agreement
with is SLM-based or MELC- forms
disabilities, aligned (please provide
giftedness and annotations of one’s
talents contribution to the video
lesson)

SET B Demonstrated
Teacher Reflection Form Level 5 as
(TRF) on designing, shown in the
adapting, and/or TRFs
implementing teaching
strategies that are Quality
responsive to learners with
disabilities, giftedness and
talents

“Learners with disability, giftedness and talents” is operationally defined as persons 1) who are gif

● These persons may be gifted/talented, a fast learner, mentally retarded, visually impaired

problems, learning disabled, speech impaired, multiple handicapped (DO 117, s. 1987).
● “Disability shall mean a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or mo

individual.” (RA 7277)
● “Students with gifts and talents perform - or have the capability to perform - at higher le

domains. They require modification(s) to their educational experience(s) to learn and rea

● For reference, other issuances that relate to learners with disability, giftedness and talen

DepEd Order No. 72, s. 2009 or the Inclusive Education as Strategy for Increasing Partic

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g, & Assessment and Reporting

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Demonstrated
Level 3 in
Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Objective 9 as
shown in COT
Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in rating sheets /
inter-observer
Objective 9 as Objective 9 as Objective 9 as agreement
forms
shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT

rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /

inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer

agreement agreement agreement

forms forms forms

or

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Level 4 as Level 3 as Level 2 as Level 1 as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
TRFs TRFs TRFs TRFs

or

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

fted or talented and those 2) who have physical, mental, social, or sensory impairment.
d, hearing impaired, with behavior problems, orthopedically handicapped, with special health

ore psychological, physiological or anatomical function of an individual or activities of such

evels compared to others of the same age, experience, and environment in one or more
alize their potential.” (National Association for Gifted Children, 2019)
nts are: DECS Order 26, s.1997 or the Institutionalization of SPED Programs in All Schools, and
cipation Rate of Children.

13

Note for SET A: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing
(ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sam

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 1
COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
5 3

Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing
RPMS rating. See sample computation below:

Means of Verification RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for T
Scale Rating 3.500 Quality Outstand
TRF 1 Very Sat
TRF 2 3 4 Satisfact
(Very Satisfactory) Unsatisfa
4 Poor (1)

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;
mple computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

g the rating for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

ding (5) 4.500-5.000

tisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

tory (3) 2.500-3.499

actory (2) 1.500-2.499

1.000-1.499

14

KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION (5)
Quality
10. Adapted SET A Demonstrated D
and used Classroom Level 7 in L
culturally observation tool (COT) Objective 10 as O
appropriate rating sheet or inter- shown in COT s
teaching observer agreement rating sheets / r
strategies to form obtained from an inter-observer i
address the observation of a video agreement a
needs of lesson or audio lesson forms f
learners from that is SLM-based or
indigenous MELC-aligned (please
groups provide annotations of
one’s contribution to the
video lesson)

SET B Demonstrated D
Teacher Reflection Level 5 as L
Form (TRF) on shown in the s
adapting and using TRFs T
culturally appropriate
teaching strategies to Quality
address the needs of
learners from
indigenous groups

“Learners from indigenous groups” is operationally defined as people who have, under claims of o
common bonds of language, customs, traditions, and other unique cultural traits (RA 8371 or IPR

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g, & Assessment and Reporting

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Demonstrated
Level 3 in
Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Objective 10 as
shown in COT
Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in rating sheets /
inter-observer
Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as agreement forms

shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT or

rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /

inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer

agreement agreement agreement forms

forms forms

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Level 4 as Level 3 as Level 2 as Level 1 as shown
shown in the shown in the shown in the in the TRFs
TRFs TRFs TRFs
or

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

ownership since time immemorial, occupied, possessed, and utilized ancestral territories, shared
RA of 1997).

15

Note for SET A: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing
(ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sam

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 1
COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
5 3

Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing
RPMS rating. See sample computation below:

Means of Verification RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for T
Scale Rating 3.500 Quality Outstand
TRF 1 Very Sat
TRF 2 3 4 Satisfact
(Very Satisfactory) Unsatisfa
4 Poor (1)

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;
mple computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

g the rating for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

ding (5) 4.500-5.000

tisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

tory (3) 2.500-3.499

actory (2) 1.500-2.499

1.000-1.499

16

KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION QET Outstanding
(5)

11. Adapted and Any supplementary Adapted /

implemented material (in print/digital implemented

learning format) made by the ratee* learning

programs that and used in the lesson programs tha

ensure delivery that highlights are well-

relevance and adapting and implementing aligned with

responsiveness learning programs that the learning

to the needs of ensure relevance and goals and

all learners responsiveness to the needs relevant and

of all learners appropriate in

• one lesson from a self- responding to

learning module (SLM) learning needs

• lesson plan (e.g., DLP, as shown in th
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, submitted
lesson exemplars, and Quality learning

the likes) materials

• video lesson or audio

lesson that is SLM-based

or MELC-aligned

• other learning materials in

print/digital format (please

specify and provide

annotations)

with client/learner feedback

highlighting the relevance

and responsiveness of the

learning program to the

needs of the learners

Learning programs are organized and sequenced set of strategies, activities and tasks t

numeracy programs, Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM), enrichment programs, reme

Education Programs (IEP), among others. A group of teachers or an entire school may c

*If the supplementary material is a product of a group work / collaborative effort of two (2
to a material.

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g, & Assessment and Reporting

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

g Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4)

Adapted / Utilized a Utilized No acceptable

implemented learning learning evidence was

learning program that is program/s that shown

at programs that well-aligned is/are partially

are well- with the aligned with

aligned with learning goals the learning

the learning and relevant or goal/s and only

goals and appropriate in somehow

relevant or responding to respond to

n appropriate in learning needs learning

responding to as shown in the needs as

s learning needs submitted shown in the

he as shown in the learning submitted

submitted material learning

learning material

material

that effect learning (PPST, 2017) that may include, but not limited to, literacy programs,
ediation programs, intervention modules, ALS modular programs, SPED Individualized
collaborate on a learning program.

2) or more teachers, ratee should specify and provide annotations of one’s contribution

17

KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION QET Outstandin
Quality (5)
12. Utilized One (1) lesson plan or a
assessment lesson script for TV- or Utilized
data to inform radio-based instruction with assessment
the annotations highlighting data to inform
modification of utilization of available the
teaching and assessment data (e.g., PISA, modification
learning TIMMS, other open access) in teaching and
practices and modifying teaching and learning
programs learning practices or practices and
programs (please provide programs in
annotations of one’s all the
contribution to the video components
lesson) of instructio
in the lesson
plan / script
to improve
student
learning

Components of instruction – learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessments

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

g, & Assessment and Reporting

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

ng Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4)

Utilized Utilized Utilized No acceptable

assessment assessment assessment evidence was

m data to inform data to inform data to inform shown

the the the modification

of modification of modification of of teaching and

d teaching and teaching and learning

learning learning practices and

d practices and practices and programs is

programs in programs in identified but

two one was poorly

s components component of used as basis

on of instruction instruction in for planning /

on in the lesson the lesson designing the

t plan / script plan / script lesson / script

to improve to improve

student student

learning learning

18

KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engage
Development

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION QET Outstanding
(5)

13. Maintained Any supplementary material (in Provided
learning print/digital format) used in the effective
environments lesson delivery that highlights learning
that are maintaining learning environments that opportunities
responsive to are responsive to community contexts that are well-
community aligned with the
contexts • one lesson from a self- learning goals
learning module (SLM) and appropriate
Quality in responding
• lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, beyond
WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson community
exemplars, and the likes) contexts as
shown in the
• video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned

• other learning materials in
print/digital format (please

specify and provide submitted

annotations) learning
(If the supplementary material is a materials
product of a group work / collaborative

effort of two (2) or more teachers,

ratee should specify and provide
annotations of one’s contribution to a

material.)

Learning environment is the classroom and other physical learning areas outside the classroom.

Community contexts refer to general situations and circumstances in which learners learn from instruct

compendium of target competencies in the context of the pandemic.

Community/wider school community refers to both internal and external stakeholders (PPST, 2017).

Notes:

● This objective refers to programs, projects, and activities that enrich the learning environment and
collaborate on a program, project, or activity. Moreover, responding beyond community contexts re

● Education can be conducted better by focusing on community and community building and seeking
improve pedagogical, curricular, and cocurricular environments” (Bickford, D. & Wright, D., 2006).
o Pedagogical approaches – active learning activities in class use cooperative techniques; team

visitors such as civic leaders or alumni can broaden classroom community and enrich discuss
o Curricular approaches – tutoring programs are offered for at-risk learners and learners with le

grade/credit;
o Cocurricular approaches – social and cultural activities explore and build on the community’s

responsibilities and develop leadership skills; co-curricular activities involve students, faculty,

management decisions to create a sense of ownership and responsibility.

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ement & Personal Growth and Professional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) No acceptable
evidence was
Provided Provided an Provided shown

effective effective learning

learning learning opportunity/ies

opportunities opportunity that is/are

that are well- that is well- partially aligned

e aligned with the aligned with the with the learning

learning goals learning goal/s goal/s and only

e and appropriate and appropriate somehow

in responding to in responding to appropriate in

community community responding to

contexts as contexts as community

shown in the shown in the contexts as

submitted submitted shown in the

learning learning submitted

materials materials learning

materials

tion (PPST, 2017). For instance, the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC) serves as

the wider school community’s engagement in the educative process. A group of teachers may
efers to provided learning opportunities that are long-term, sustainable, and anticipatory in nature.
g ways in which community can improve student learning; one of which is by “using community to
Here are sample activities that foster an engaged community in student learning:
m-based projects are conducted outside class and culminate in student-led presentations; classroom
sion; learners meet with faculty in office spaces that are easy to find and conducive to dialogue;
earning needs; learner research projects culminate in school presentations with appropriate

heritage and mission; learners participate in volunteer work to expand their understanding of social
and staff in shared dialogue; learners participate in experiential learning opportunities and in campus

19

KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engage
Development

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION (5)

14. Reviewed 1. Annotated video / Exhibited an

regularly audio recording of improved
personal one’s teaching that
teaching practice
practice using shows impact of through one’s
existing laws
and regulations regularly reviewing teaching as
that apply to the one’s teaching
teaching impact of
profession and practice/s
regularly
2. Annotated teaching reviewing one’s

material that shows teaching

impact of regularly practice/s using
reviewing one’s

the teaching practice/s laws and

responsibilities ● lesson plan Quality regulations that
specified in the ● assessment apply to the
Code of Ethics profession and
for Professional materials the
Teachers ● others (please responsibilities
in the Code of
specify) Ethics for
3. Personal reflection Professional

notes as outputs from
participation in review
of personal teaching

practices in four (4) Teachers as

quarters evidenced by

4. Proof of attendance MOV No. 1
(with date) in LAC or

coaching and

mentoring sessions for

review of personal

teaching practices

Notes:

• The video / audio recordings and teaching materials should be made by the ratee and annotated b

• For Senior High School (SHS) teachers who follow a semestral structure, MOV 3 will be two (2) re

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ement & Personal Growth and Professional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) No acceptable
evidence was
Exhibited an Reviewed Participated in shown

improved personal the review of

practice teaching personal

through a practices using teaching

teaching laws and practices using

material as regulations that laws and

impact of apply to the regulations that

regularly profession and apply to the

reviewing the profession and
the
one’s teaching responsibilities

practice/s in the Code of responsibilities

using laws and Ethics for in the Code of

regulations Professional Ethics for

that apply to Teachers in 4 Professional

the profession quarters with Teachers in 4

and the reflection quarters as

responsibilities outputs as evidenced by

in the Code of evidenced by MOV No. 4

Ethics for MOV No. 3

Professional

Teachers as

evidenced by

MOV No. 2

based on how their use in the classroom shows impact of regularly reviewing one’s teaching practice/s.
eflection notes per semester.

20

KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engage
Development

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION (5)

15. Complied 1. Proof of participation Engaged with
stakeholders
with and / involvement in a regarding
implemented community partnership DepEd / school
school policies at the national / policies and
and procedures regional / division / procedures
consistently to school level for the through
foster implementation of a school-
harmonious DepEd/school community
relationships policy/procedure such partnership/s
as the BE-LCP (e.g., as evidenced by
MOV no. 1
with learners, reassignment order,

parents, and certificate as committee

other member, narrative Quality
stakeholders report)
2. Proof of other

stakeholders meeting

(e.g., attendance sheet

with minutes of online

or face-to-face meeting)

3. Any form of

communication to

stakeholders (e.g.,

screenshot of chat/text

message/

communication [name

or any identifier

removed])

Note: In this objective, stakeholders may include DepEd offices involved in the Teacher-Broadcaster pr

Service (PAS). Further, the means of verifications may also refer to the policies and procedures implem
procedures is the Basic Education–Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) e.g., TV- and radio-based instru

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ement & Personal Growth and Professional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Implemented No acceptable
DepEd / school evidence was
Discussed with Communicated policies and shown
procedures
stakeholders with without
communicating
the implemented stakeholders and consulting
the stakeholders
DepEd / school the implemented

policies and DepEd / school

procedures as policies and

evidenced by procedures as

MOV no. 2 evidenced by

MOV no. 3

rogram such as the Information and Communications Technology Service (ICTS) and Public Affairs
mented at the national, regional, division, or school level. Example of such DepEd/school policies and
uction.

21

KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engage
Development

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)
16. Applied a
personal One (1) lesson plan Applied learner
philosophy of or a lesson script for centered
teaching that is TV- or radio-based teaching
learner-centered instruction with philosophy in
annotations the lesson plan
identifying the in all the
application of a components o
personal philosophy instruction in
of teaching that is the lesson
learner-centered plan / script
(please provide
annotations of one’s
contribution to the
video lesson)

Components of instruction – learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessments

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ement & Personal Growth and Professional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) No acceptable
evidence was
r- Applied learner- Applied Application of shown

centered learner- learner-centered

teaching centered teaching

philosophy in teaching philosophy is

n the lesson plan philosophy in reflected but

in two the lesson plan was poorly

of components of in one used as basis

instruction in component of for planning /

the lesson instruction in designing the

plan / script the lesson lesson / script

plan / script

22

KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engage
Development

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)
17. Adopted
practices that 1. Documented feedback Exhibited
uphold the from superiors, colleagues, dignity of
dignity of or other stakeholders teaching as a
teaching as a directly reflecting the profession by
profession by ratee’s good practices that exhibiting
exhibiting uphold the dignity of qualities such
qualities such teaching as a profession as caring
as caring attitude,
attitude, 2. Annotated evidence of respect, and
respect and practice indirectly linking to integrity with
integrity the upholding of the dignity affirmation
of teaching as a profession from different
by exhibiting qualities such school
as caring attitude, respect stakeholders
and integrity as evidenced
● Remarks from superiors, by at least two
colleagues, or master MOV No. 1
teacher / school head
about one’s qualities
(e.g., entries in
Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
[PMCF] or in Mid-Year
Review Form)
● Recognition from the
school / school
community about one’s
qualities
● Others (please specify)

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ement & Personal Growth and Professional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) No acceptable
evidence was
Exhibited Adopted Adopted a shown

dignity of practices that practice that

teaching as a uphold the uphold the

profession by dignity of dignity of

exhibiting teaching as a teaching as a

qualities such profession by profession by

as caring exhibiting exhibiting

attitude, qualities such qualities such as

respect, and as caring caring attitude,

integrity with attitude, respect, and

affirmation respect, and integrity as

from any integrity as evidenced by

school evidenced by one MOV No. 2

stakeholder as at least two

evidenced by MOV No. 2

one MOV No. 1

23

KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engage
Development

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)

18. Set 1. Updated IPCRF-DP Updated
professional from Phase II professional
development development
goals based on 2. Mid-year Review Form goals during
the Philippine (MRF) Phase II of the
Professional RPMS Cycle as
Standards for 3. IPCRF-DP evidenced by
Teachers 4. Certification from the MOV No. 1

ICT Coordinator /
School Head / Focal
Person in charge of e-
SAT

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ement & Personal Growth and Professional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4)

Discussed Set Accomplished No acceptable

progress on professional the e-SAT at the evidence

professional development beginning of the

development goals based school year as

goals with the on e-SAT evidenced by

s rater during the results as MOV No. 4

mid-year review evidenced by

as evidenced MOV No. 3

by MOV No. 2

24

KRA 5: Plus Factor

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)

19. Performed Any proof of: Performed at
various related ● committee least 1 related
works / work / activity
activities that involvement that contributed
contribute to ● involvement as to the teaching-
the teaching- learning
learning module / learning process
process material writer / beyond the
validator school /
● book or journal Community
authorship / Learning
contributorship Center (CLC)
● coordinatorship / as evidenced
chairpersonship by submitted
● participation as MOV
research presenter
in a forum /
conference
● participation in
demonstration
teaching
● others (please
specify and
provide
annotations)

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4)

Performed at Performed at Performed at No acceptable

least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related evidence was

work / activity work / activity work / activity shown

d that contributed that that contributed

- to the teaching- contributed to to the teaching-

learning the teaching- learning process

process within learning within the class

the school / process within as evidenced by

Community the learning submitted MOV

Learning area /

Center (CLC) department as

as evidenced evidenced by

by submitted submitted

MOV MOV

25

Audio Lesson GLOS

Daily Lesson Log (DLL) Refers to a learning material that is an audio recorded
Detailed Lesson Plan
(DLP) This can be saved in a USB flash drive and played in a
See Lesson Plan
See Lesson Plan

Functions as a professional learning community for tea
Education 2016a, i)

Learning Action Cell (LAC) LAC aims to improve the teaching-learning process tha
to enable teachers to support each other to continuous
Lesson Exemplar and to foster a professional collaborative spirit among s
Lesson Plan 2016a, 3).
“During pandemic and other disruptive events, all publi
Most Essential Learning exemplars instead of the usu al Detailed Lesson Plan
Competencies (MELCs) (Department of Education - CALABARZON 2020, 10).
Refers to the Daily Lesson Log (DLL) or Detailed Les
Online Synchronous
Teaching Other forms of a lesson plan are the Weekly Lesson P
Lesson Exemplars (LE).
Refer to the competencies from the K to 12 curriculum
satisfying the so-called endurance criterion.

Anchored on the prescribed standards, these compete
nationwide by field implementers and private schools fo
especially during emergencies such as the current glob
A mode of teaching that utilizes video conferencing, liv
learners to work in real-time

These materials may be designed for collaborative task
2020b, 31).
Refer to learning resources crafted by teachers to supp

Supplementary Materials These materials should be aligned with DepEd standar
radio-based instruction. These teacher-made learning
and MELCs-aligned video- and audio-lessons (Departm
tasks can also be part of the supplementary materials w
they did not fully understand and need additional help f
Refers to real-time instruction via handheld two-way ra

Two-way Radio Instruction “Those areas with Last Mile Schools which cannot be r
handheld two-way radios or ‘walkie-talkies.’ These sch

3-5 kilometers away from the school. Paired with DepE

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

SSARY

lesson which can be used for distance learning or as supplementary material

a device (e.g., plug-and-play radios with USB port, TV with USB port, computer, etc.).

achers that will help them improve practice and learner achievement (Department of

at will lead to improved learning among the students; to nurture successful teachers;
sly improve their content and pedagogical knowledge, practice, skills, and attitudes;
school heads, teachers, and the community as a whole (Department of Education

ic elementary and secondary school teachers in the region shall prepare their lesson
(DLPs) and/or Daily Learning Logs (DLL) for MELCs and/or enabling competencies”

sson Plan (DLP) as part of instructional planning (Department of Education 2016b)

Plan (WLP), Weekly Lesson Log (WLL), Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP) and

guides which are most useful in many professions and in everyday life, thereby

encies identified by the Department in consultation with stakeholders are to be used
or SY 2020-2021 as a response to developing resilient education systems most
bal pandemic (Department of Education, 2020a).
ve chat, instant messaging, or a combination of any of the online tools to engage

ks to engage learners on virtual collaboration among peers (Department of Education

plement the materials handed down by the DepEd division/regional/central offices

rds and support the contextualized needs of learners in online, modular, and TV- and
materials can be printed or digital modules, activity sheets, interactive e-materials,
ment of Education - Undersecretary for Curriculum and Instruction 2020, 3). Writing
where learners can write the challenges they are facing and what parts of the lesson
for from their teacher (Department of Education 2020b, 37)
adios or walkie-talkies.

reached by the 25-50 kilometer radius coverage are would now be served using
hools would each be given sets of walkie-talkies to be able to reach learners who are
Ed printed modules, teachers are able to guide their students and answer their

26

Video Lesson questions real-time. The combination of the two modali
even in the absence of online options, television and ra
Weekly Home Learning Administration, 2021)
Plan (WHLP) Refers to a learning material similar to a video-recorde
Weekly Lesson Log (WLL) supplementary material
Weekly Lesson Plan (WLP)
This material can be uploaded to YouTube, Google Cla
or CD-ROMs).
“The Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP) shall be p
DLL…shall be prepared by teachers implementing F2F
2020, Appendix D).
See Lesson Plan
See Lesson Plan

REFERENCES

Bickford, Deborah J. and David J. Wright. 2006. “Community: The Hidden Con
https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB7102d.pdf

Government of the Philippines. 1997. The Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act of 1997. Rep

Government of the Philippines. 1991. Magna Carta for Disabled persons. Republic Act N

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2020a. Guidelines on the Use

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2020b. Adoption of the Basic
Public Health Emergency. Pasig City.

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2019a. Classroom Observatio

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2019b. Results-based Perform

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2017. National Adoption and I

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2016a. The Learning Actio
Development Strategy for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Pasig City

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 2016b. Policy Guidelines on D

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education. 1987. Policies and Guidelines

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education-CALABARZON. 2019. PIVOT

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education-Undersecretary for Administra
Modality. Pasig City.

Government of the Philippines, Department of Education-Undersecretary for Curriculum a
Modalities (DLDM) for School Year 2020-2021. Pasig City.

National Association for Gifted Children. 2019. A Definition of Giftedness that G
Definition%20of%20Giftedness%20%282019%29.pdf

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Teacher I-III Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters only

ities, printed modules and handheld radios, enable the effective delivery of lessons
adio broadcast services” (Department of Education – Undersecretary for
ed lesson and video-taped lesson used for online asynchronous teaching or used as

assroom, or any online platform, or distributed via storage devices (e.g., flash drives
prepared by teachers implementing Distance and Blended Learning while the DLP or
F learning” (Department of Education - Undersecretary for Curriculum and Instruction

ntext for Learning.” In Learning Spaces, edited by Diana Oblinger. EDUCAUSE.
public Act No. 8371. Manila.
No. 7277. Manila.
e of the Most Essential Learning Competencies. Pasig City.

Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in Light of the Covid-19
on Tool. Pasig City.
mance Management System Updated Manual. Pasig City.
Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Pasig City.
on Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program School-based Continuing Professional
y.
Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Pasig City.
s for Special Education. Pasig City.

4A Budget of Work in All Learning Areas in Key Stage 1-4 (version 2.0). Cainta.
ation. 2021. The Proper Use of DepEd Radio as a Blended Distance Learning Delivery
and Instruction. 2020. Suggested Strategies in Implementing Distance Learning Delivery
Guides Best Practice. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/

27

RPMS Tool for Master Teacher I-

Full-time Teache
in the time of
S.Y. 202

POSITION AND COMPETENCY

Department of Education Master Teacher I-IV

Position Title
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit
Reports to

Position Supervised

JOB S

QUALIFICATI

A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications (For Senior High School Teachers, please re

Position Title Master Teacher I Master

Education For Elementary School - For Elementa
Bachelor of Elementary Bachelor of E
Education (BEEd) or Education (BE
Bachelor’s degree plus 18 Bachelor’s de
professional units in professional u

Education; and 18 units for a and 24 units f
Master’s degree in Education degree in Edu

or its equivalent equivalent

For Secondary School - For Secondar

Bachelor of Secondary Bachelor of S

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters

-IV (Highly Proficient Teachers)

er-Broadcasters
f COVID-19
21-2022

PROFILE PCP No. ______ Revision Code: 00

Salary Grade

Effectivity Date
Page/s

SUMMARY

ION STANDARDS

efer to: DO 3, s. 2016; DO 27, s. 2016; and DO 51, s. 2017)

r Teacher II Master Teacher III Master Teacher IV

ary School - Completion of academic Completion of academic
Elementary requirements for a Master’s requirements for a Master’s
EEd) or degree in Education or its degree in Education or its
egree plus 18 equivalent equivalent
units in Education;

for a Master’s
ucation or its

ry School - Completion of academic Completion of academic
Secondary requirements for a Master’s requirements for a Master’s

only 1

Education (BSEd) or Education (BS
Bachelor’s degree plus 18 Bachelor’s de
professional units in Education professional u
with appropriate major; and 18 and 24 units fo
units for a Master’s degree in degree in Edu
Education or its equivalent
Experience 3 years relevant experience equivalent
1 year as Mas
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None required 4 years as Te
B. Preferred Qualifications RA 1080
Education Master’s Degree Graduate 4 hours releva
Experience 3 years in service as Teacher III
Eligibility PBET/LET/BLEPT Passer
Trainings Relevant trainings

DUTIES AND RESP

1. Models exemplary practice in the application of content knowledge and pedagogy s

2. Conducts in-depth studies or action researches on teaching-learning innovations
3. Works with colleagues to create learning-focused environments that promote learn
4. Assists colleagues to implement differentiated teaching strategies that are respons
5. Leads in the preparation and enrichment of curriculum
6. Initiates programs and projects that can enhance the curriculum and its implementa
7. Leads colleagues in the design, evaluation, interpretation and utilization of different
8. Updates parents/guardians on learner needs, progress and achievement
9. Strengthens school-community partnerships to enrich engagement of internal and e
10. Establishes links with colleagues through attendance and membership in professio
11. Provides technical assistance through demonstration teaching, mentoring, coachin

trainers/facilitators in teacher quality circles/learning action cells
12. Does related work

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters

SEd) or degree in Education or its degree in Education or its
egree plus 18 equivalent equivalent
units in Education;
or a Master’s
ucation or its

ster Teacher I or 1 year as Master Teacher II or 1 year as Master Teacher III or
eacher III
5 years as Teacher III 5 years as Teacher III
ant training RA 1080 RA 1080
8 hours of relevant training 16 hours of relevant training

PONSIBILITIES
showing its integration within and across learning areas

ner responsibility and achievement
sive to learner diversity

ation
t types of assessment tools for the improvement of the teaching and learning process

external stakeholders in the educative process
onal organizations for self-growth and advancement
ng, class monitoring and observation, organizing/leading/serving as

2

only

KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION (5)

1. Modelled Classroom Modelled Level M
effective observation tool (COT) 8 in Objective 1 7
applications of rating sheet obtained as shown in a
content from an observation of a COT rating C
knowledge video lesson or audio sheets s
within and lesson that is SLM-
across based or MELC-aligned
curriculum (please provide
teaching areas annotations of one’s
contribution to the video
lesson) with proof of Quality
attendance of
colleague/s

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating
calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sampl

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
COT Rating Sheet 1 Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 2
7 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
6 3

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters o

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Modelled Level 4
in Objective 1 as
Modelled Level Modelled Level Modelled Level shown in COT
rating sheets
7 in Objective 1 6 in Objective 1 5 in Objective 1
or
as shown in as shown in as shown in

COT rating COT rating COT rating

sheets sheets sheets

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

g for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii)
le computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

3

only

KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION QET Outstanding
(5)

2. Evaluated Any supplementary material (in Modelled and

with print / digital format) made by the evaluated with
colleagues the ratee* and used in the lesson colleagues
effectiveness delivery that highlights teaching effective
of teaching strategies that promote learner strategies that
strategies that achievement in literacy and numeracy reflect

● one lesson from a self-learning

promote module (SLM) adjustments

learner ● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, modifications

achievement WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson in teaching
in literacy and
numeracy Exemplars, and the likes) practices to
● video lesson or audio lesson
Quality enhance critic
that is SLM-based or MELC- literacy and/or
aligned
critical numera
● other learning materials in print /

digital format (please specify skills as shown

and provide annotations) in the submitte

with minutes of focus group learning mater
discussion (FGD) with fellow

mentors or minutes of coaching

and mentoring session with

teachers that show evaluated

teaching strategies that promote

learner achievement in literacy and

numeracy

*If the supplementary material is a product of a group work / collaborative effort of two (2) or more

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating
See sample computation below:

Means of Verification RPMS 5-point Average
MOV 1: One lesson from an SLM module with minutes of FGD Scale Rating 3.500
MOV 2: Lesson Plan with minutes of coaching and mentoring
3

4

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters o

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

g Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4)

Modelled and Modelled and Modelled and Modelled

h evaluated with evaluated with evaluated with Level 4 in

colleagues colleagues colleagues Objective 2 as

effective effective effective shown in COT

t strategies that strategies that strategy/ies rating sheets

reflect reflect that reflect/s

or integration of consistent application of or

s well- application of relevant

connected relevant teaching No acceptable

teaching teaching practices that evidence was

cal practices that practices that promote critical shown

r promote critical promote critical literacy and/or

acy literacy and/or literacy and/or critical

n critical critical numeracy skills

ed numeracy skills numeracy skills in some

rial as shown in in all aspects aspects of the

the submitted of the lesson lesson as

learning as shown in shown in the

material the submitted submitted

learning learning

material material

e teachers, ratee should specify and provide annotations of one’s contribution to a material.

g for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS rating.

RPMS Rating for RPMS Rating
Quality Transmutation Table
4
Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
(Very Satisfactory)
Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
only
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

4

KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)

3. Modelled Classroom Modelled Level M
and supported observation tool 8 in Objective 3 7
colleagues in (COT) rating sheet as shown in a
the proficient obtained from an COT rating C
use of Mother observation of a video sheets s
Tongue, lesson or audio lesson
Filipino and that is SLM-based or
English to MELC-aligned (please
improve provide annotations of
teaching and one’s contribution to
learning, as the video lesson) with
well as to proof of attendance
develop of colleague/s
learners’ pride
of their
language,
heritage and
culture.

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating
calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sampl

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
COT Rating Sheet 1 Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 2
7 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
6 3

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters o

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Modelled Level 4
in Objective 3 as
Modelled Level Modelled Level Modelled Level shown in COT
rating sheets
7 in Objective 3 6 in Objective 3 5 in Objective 3
or
as shown in as shown in as shown in

COT rating COT rating COT rating

sheets sheets sheets

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

g for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii)
le computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

5

only

KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)

4. Displayed a Classroom Modelled Level M
wide range of observation tool 8 in Objective 4 7
effective verbal (COT) rating sheet as shown in a
and non-verbal obtained from an COT rating C
classroom observation of a video sheets s
communicatio lesson or audio lesson
n strategies to that is SLM-based or
support learner MELC-aligned (please
understanding, provide annotations of
participation, one’s contribution to the
engagement video lesson) with
and proof of attendance of
achievement colleague/s

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating
calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sampl

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
COT Rating Sheet 1 Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 2
7 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
6 3

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters o

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Modelled Level 4
in Objective 4 as
Modelled Level Modelled Level Modelled Level shown in COT
rating sheets
7 in Objective 4 6 in Objective 4 5 in Objective 4
or
as shown in as shown in as shown in

COT rating COT rating COT rating

sheets sheets sheets

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

g for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii)
le computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

6

only

KRA 2: Learning Environment

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION (5)
Quality
5. Exhibited Classroom observation Modelled Level M
effective tool (COT) rating sheet 8 in Objective 5 7
strategies that obtained from an as shown in a
ensure safe and observation of a video COT rating C
secure learning lesson or audio lesson sheets s
environments to that is SLM-based or
enhance MELC-aligned (please
learning through provide annotations of
the consistent one’s contribution to the
implementation video lesson) with proof
of policies, of attendance of
guidelines and colleague/s
procedures

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating
calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sampl

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
COT Rating Sheet 1 Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 2
7 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
6 3

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters o

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Modelled Level 4
in Objective 5 as
Modelled Level Modelled Level Modelled Level shown in COT
rating sheets
7 in Objective 5 6 in Objective 5 5 in Objective 5
or
as shown in as shown in as shown in

COT rating COT rating COT rating

sheets sheets sheets

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

g for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii)
le computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

7

only

KRA 2: Learning Environment

OBJECTIVE MEANS OF QET Outstanding
VERIFICATION Quality (5)

6. Exhibited Classroom Modelled Level M
effective observation tool 8 in Objective 6 7
practices to (COT) rating sheet as shown in a
foster learning obtained from an COT rating C
environments observation of a video sheets s
that promote lesson or audio lesson
fairness, respect that is SLM-based or
and care to MELC-aligned (please
encourage provide annotations of
learning one’s contribution to
the video lesson) with
proof of attendance of
colleague/s

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating
calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sampl

Means of Verification COT RPMS 5-point Average RPMS Rating for
COT Rating Sheet 1 Rating Scale Rating 3.500 Quality
COT Rating Sheet 2
7 4 4
(Very Satisfactory)
6 3

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 for Master Teacher I-IV Full-time Teacher-Broadcasters o

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Satisfactory (3) (2) (1)

(4) Modelled Level 4
in Objective 6 as
Modelled Level Modelled Level Modelled Level shown in COT
rating sheets
7 in Objective 6 6 in Objective 6 5 in Objective 6
or
as shown in as shown in as shown in

COT rating COT rating COT rating

sheets sheets sheets

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

g for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii)
le computation below:

RPMS Rating
Transmutation Table

Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

8

only