KTAC PERFO MANA BOO ••• NO MATRIC: 829455 PREPARED FOR: ASSOC PROF. DR. FAIZUNIAH PANGIL
D El D D Company Background Academic Staff Performance · • • • Management • • • • Process Flowc_h�·rt_ · • • • • • • • • • ••• • • ••• Performance Scorecard · • • • • • e • • • ••••• . . . . . " • • • • • • ••• • • • • Academic Staff Performance · • • • • • • Review Process Flowchart · . " • • • : : • • • • • ACADEMIC STAFF
COMPANY BACKGROUND ••• KTAC was established in 1997 and is known as the Cybernatics Institute of Technology. In 2002, it was approved and recognised by the Ministry of Education as Cybernatics International Technology College (KTAC) and has celebrated the Silver Jubilee in 2022 to celebrate its 25 years of operation. KTAC has produced over 30.000 qualified graduates since its inception. ACADEMIC STAFF
••• VISION Cybernatics aspired to be a centre of excellence i the academic and human capital development. MISSION Cybernatics is to be a leading private institution of higher education capable of nurturing well-rounded graduates who are knowledgeable and competent in their ACADEMIC FIELDS & SOCIAL SKILLS thus processing the competitive edge required by the job market. ACADEMIC STAFF
ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT KTAC has 74 staff: ••• • 41 are from the academic department. • 33 are non-academic staff. School of Business Management (SBM) • Dip. Management of Human Resources(DPSM) • Dip. Business Management (OPP) • Dip. Islamic Banking School of Human Science (SHS) Dip. Hotel & Catering Management I DHC) School of Art and Technology (SAT) • Dip. Early Childhood Education (ECED) Dip. Tourism Management • Dip. Aviation Management (□PL) (DAM) Dip. Halal Industrial Management (□PIH) • Dip. Creative Multimedia (□MK) • Dip. In Cyber Forensic(DCF) ACADEMIC STAFF
Academic Staff Performance Management Process Flowchart Steps of Performonce Monogement Process Flowchort 1. HR sends o communii��n email to academic staff about the annual evaluation setting. 2. Academic staff provide performance information, including student satisfaction (DAA), teaching & system (operation deportment), and school commitment {HOS) 3. Input the performance information into the performance evaluation system 4. Stoff check the performance evaluation for accuracy 5. If the performance evaluation is complete, submit it to HOS. 6. HOS rev;e Is cod gh,es feedback to staff on the annual evaluation 7. If HOS approves the performance evaluation, submit it to HR for record ACADEMIC STAFF
Guidelines of Performance Management Process Flowchart • If HOS approves the performance evaluation, it should be submitted to HR for record. This will help to ensure that the evaluation is properly documented and that it can be used for future reference. ACADEMIC STAFF
I Performance Scorecard -· -�00, - ,._, ---�---= M,ll___fK,i; w:-..,•1r-.... ••-""•• ����-,llif4l.j a...!.,--�_,.,. . rt-llt.allfla""Mi'l;d'idwid�kti ....... ��.,----� ��� .t!IN!!!�---�-G�,11 ...... 1\9',.... -... ----- -- -- � ---- -Tiliw\g _,,. -- ACADEMIC STAFF .,,,..,...lli!l!4ff.li«'4M �- --.. ..,_ �� iM �MINI-Ml l!N'tililii<IIIII - ' CIMl.lJIWCiliMlil'6ta ..,. ._..�MQl,;r� .... __ ___ .. ="�� 0 0 0 0
c:= KT AC Academic Staff Performance Review Flowchart INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED • ACADEMIC STAFF Responsible for completing a self-analysis, providing feedback on their own performance and setting goals for improvement. • HEAD OF PROGRAM (HOP) Responsible for approving the academic staff review and for ensuring that the academic staffs development needs are met. • HEAD OF SCHOOL (HOS) Responsible for providing feedback to the academic staff on their performance and for ensuring that the performance review process is completed in accordance with the MQA practices. • HR Guidance on KTAC policies and procedures. to resolve any disputes that may arise during the process and to ensure that the process is fair and equitable ACADEMIC STAFF
Steps and Guideline to Perform Performance Review Flowchart • The performance review process is complete once the review has been approved by all parties. ACADEMIC STAFF