IDP Guidebook 2022

GUIDEBOOK

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN PEMBUATAN
UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA

ABOUT......................................................................................................................................................... 3
LEARNING OUTCOME................................................................................................................................... 3
EVALUATION CRITERIA................................................................................................................................. 4
TIMELINE ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
FLOW OF IDP................................................................................................................................................ 6
WORKING AREA........................................................................................................................................... 7
PROPOSAL ................................................................................................................................................... 8
LOGBOOK .................................................................................................................................................... 9
POSTER...................................................................................................................................................... 10
VIDEO DEMONSTRATION ........................................................................................................................... 12
PROJECT REPORT ....................................................................................................................................... 13
EVALUATION RUBRIC ................................................................................................................................. 15

PROPOSAL ........................................................................................................................................................ 15
GENERAL CONDUCT ......................................................................................................................................... 16
PROTOTYPE (BMFG) ......................................................................................................................................... 18
PROTOTYPE (BMFI)........................................................................................................................................... 20
POSTER ............................................................................................................................................................. 22
VIDEO DEMONSTRATION ................................................................................................................................. 23
PROJECT REPORT (BMFG)................................................................................................................................. 24
PROJECT REPORT (BMFI) .................................................................................................................................. 28
PEER REVIEW .................................................................................................................................................... 32

2

ABOUT

Integrated Design Project (IDP) requires the students to use the fundamental of engineering
knowledge to solve engineering problems or develop a practical product with consideration of
safety, environment, and sustainability factors. The product development process includes
integration of market study, conceptual design, material selection, process selection,
engineering analysis and product fabrication or system development while incorporating
project management components and economic feasibility study. The IDP project will be
executed with a team-based approach with supervision by academic lecturers to enhance the
teamwork, communication, and problem-solving skill in accordance with industrial practise. At
the end of this course, students will showcase their product with a physical working prototype
and pitch their product with an interactive video demonstration.

http://fkp.utem.edu/en/idp
Integrated Design Project Committee 2022,
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Pembuatan,
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.

LEARNING OUTCOME

At the end of the course, students are able to:
1) Design solution by synthesizing manufacturing engineering knowledge that will solve

complex manufacturing engineering problem in accordance with relevant standards.
2) Utilize modern engineering and IT tools in facilitating solutions to complex

manufacturing engineering problems with an understanding of the limitations.
3) Evaluate the impact of the design product, component, or processes in term of safety,

environmental and sustainability factors.
4) Demonstrate effectively teamwork skill in completing the IDP.
5) Apply project management and financial knowledge effectively in completing the IDP.

3

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The overall score for your IDP project will come from your supervisor (35%), industrial panel
and examiner (55%) and your peers (10%).

Assessment Item

1

Proposal 4
(5%)

23

General conduct Prototype Video Demonstration
(10%) (20%) (10%)

5 6 7

Poster Project Report Peer Review
(5%) (40%) (10%)

Refer to Evaluation Rubric for the details of the assessment criteria.

4

TIMELINE

WEEK
1 Briefing to students and SVs
2 Proposal submission
3 IOT Workshop 1
.
.
.
.
8 IOT Workshop 2
9 Mid-term break
.
11 Product Pitching Talk
12 Submission of Logbook
13 Submission of Peer Review Marks
14 IDP Day (Poster presentation and Prototype Exhibition)
15 Submission of Final Report

5

FLOW OF IDP

Proposal Submission

Vetting by the
NG IDP Committee

OK

Acquisition of raw
material

Fabrication of
Product

Continuous update
with project supervisor

Project Presentation to
Industrial Panel

Project Report
Submission

Claim application Handover of selected
and reimbursement physical product to IDP

committee

6

WORKING AREA

The lab dedicated to IDP activities is Project Lab located at PFI-B, Teaching Factory, UTeM.
Students are advised to directly liaise with the Assistant Engineer-in-charge for technical
support and arrangement regarding the use of materials, equipment and workspace. Everyone
is strictly reminded to adhere to the safety regulations and Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) when working in the lab.

Entrance

Entrance

Lobby

Project Lab

Entrance

Figure 1: (Top) Layout for Project Lab at PFI-B, Teaching Factory.
(Bottom) Machines / Workspace allocated for IDP projects.

7

PROPOSAL

As you have completed all the groundwork during Product Design & Manufacturing cost, the
team are now required to submit a refined proposal on your planning to execute your IDP
project. The project proposal should be compactly informative which should include the
following items:

Executive Very compact description to pitch your idea. The summary should
summary clearly address the problem / issues, followed by your idea to solve the
problem / issue with your innovation and the proposed plan on product
Background construction.
Resources
Appendix This section should outline the description of the proposed product
including its functionalities.

This section should briefly summarize the material resources (software
and hardware), equipment, tools, and project schedule.

Any supportive documents can be included in this section.

8

LOGBOOK

The Logbook is the official record of your IDP-related activities. Activities such as
precursory analysis, initial sketches, task lists, issues, reflections of past work, meeting
agendas, and meeting minutes are typical items recorded in a logbook frequently (i.e.,
daily or weekly). The logbook is an ideal way to enhance students' ability to
communicate effectively and can be used to systematically delegate task among team
members. The students are expected to write effective reports and produce design
documentation. There is no specific format for the logbook, and it can vary depending
on the project and team.

Content

The logbook’s content could be customised based on the project's suitability.
Important details on date, period, task, event, procedures, details of activity, important
points, person-in-charge, and supervisor’s comments can be included. Table 1 shows
the recommended content for the logbook.

Table 1: Recommended format for Logbook

Title: Title of the achievement or performed event
Date: Insert the date of the event

Task / Event Procedures / Details of activity Person-in-
Explain the main tasks / Action Taken / Action to be Charge (PIC)
that have been planned or Taken
executed. Person responsible
A comprehensive explanation of the to execute the task.
work that has been planned or
done. This could be related
procedures, machines or equipment
used, task delegations, the team’s
contribution, etc.

Please Include all the relevant
information ranges from sketches,
tables, figures, steps, flowcharts,
mind maps, or others.

Supervisor’s comment (if any)
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

9

POSTER

A poster is one of the different forms of professional communication, aside from a written
report and slide presentation with a very high interaction potential with the audience. A good
poster must have a clear central message, be logically organized, have minimal text, present
some appropriate graphics, visible at a distance, and have an intended effect on the audience.
You might want to create a poster capable of attracting more crowds to your place and
providing all the necessary information related to your product in the simplest way possible.
Remember, a poster should not have too great detail and technical aspect of your invention,
like what is supposed to be offered by the written report, but you need to choose only
significant points you think are required to be part of your poster. Provide informative headings,
clearly labelled figures, and sufficient blank space to avoid the poster looking cramped. In IDP,
each group is expected to create a poster to be used during the IDP exhibition, and the design
and content can vary depending on the project and team.

Content

The content of your poster could be customized according to the project’s suitability. You have
to think about the content you want to include, which might perfectly represent your product.
It can be tempting to include everything you know or have done, found, or concluded on your
poster, and this can lead to a poster full of visually unappealing text. Your poster needs to
convey the critical information succinctly. As far as possible, information should be presented
visually. Following are some suggestions for the content:

Table 2: Recommended content for Poster

Title Your poster will need a title. It should capture the main idea of your project.
Be creative! The title needs to sound attractive to encourage your audience
to look closer.

Authors List everyone who worked on the project. You may include the name of your
supervisor.

Background/ The background provides information necessary for your audience to
Introduction understand your project. It may also include the reason why you are
choosing the product. This might be outlining the problem you are looking
to solve or the research gap you have identified in the literature. It should
be brief and presented as dot points or even a single sentence.

Product Highlight the features and specific function of your product, the advantage
Features it offers, how to use it and so on. Include representative figures to convey
the idea.

Prototype You may also include the fabrication process of your product graphically or

Development the on-site testing (if applicable).

Analysis You may present any analysis that has been done for the product, like FEA,
ergonomic analysis etc.

10

Sample of poster

11

VIDEO DEMONSTRATION

A video demonstration does not need to be a long-winded explanation of the product. It is an
added bonus of creativity for students to show the audience and the panels on how the product
has been manufactured, run in simulations or experiments and analysed in terms of its
configurations. A good video is short and clear and direct to the point in terms of showing the
functioning product prototype.

Content

The video’s content should be clear, concise, and precise. It must highlight the animation of
the product’s functionality, the product’s features, it’s graphical manufactured development
and product analysis in terms of experiments or demonstrations. It works as a marketing video
that particularly convey all the benefits and advantages of the product. In short, the video
demonstration will be the visualised and animated version of your poster.

Duration Table 3: Recommended format for Video Demonstration
Not more than 5minutes. The shorter the better. But must fit with all content.

Content and You do not need to present it like a lecture but be creative to show the
video flow desired product functions and capabilities.
Not all students need to talk in the video, but most important of all, please
deliberately show the product prototype features, functionality, advantages,
and its main configurations.
You can put animations, video recordings of the product usage or anything
that is related that can convey your ideas across.

Background/ This works the same as the detailed outlined in the poster. However, try to
Introduction be creative to reach out to audience on why your product is being innovated.

Product Highlight the features and specific function of your product, the advantage
Features it offers, how to use it and so on. Include animations if possible.

Prototype You may also include the fabrication process of your product graphically or

Development the on-site testing (if applicable).

Analysis You may present any analysis that has been done for the product, like FEA,
ergonomic analysis and etc.

12

PROJECT REPORT

A Project Report is a document which contains all the critical information related to the project.
It must provide details related to task delegation, market study, engineering design process,
construction details, technical analysis as well as the financial description. The following
describes the recommended format and contents required for the Project Report.

Language

The project report should be written in British English. Upon submission, students are
recommended to recheck their report using Grammarly.com.

Font type, font size and margin

Arial, size 11 points with single spacing. Margins for left, right, top and bottom should be 2.54
cm (1 inch). Text alignment should be justified.

Report length

The length of report should not exceed 20 pages (not including the cover page, abstract and
appendix) with 4 - 5 significant figures/ tables. The other details can be attached in the
Appendix.

Content

The following items are required in the report, in this order:

1) Abstract and keywords
2) Problem / Scenario Clarification
3) Objectives and Scope
4) Project Management
5) Product Description
6) Product Construction
7) Product Analysis
8) Cost Analysis
9) Sustainability/Environment/ Safety Consideration
10) Attachment/ Appendix: Survey form, market study, detail drawings, pictures of

prototype, pictures of construction process, detail technical analysis, detail cost
analysis.

Abstract and Keywords

The abstract should be an informative synopsis/ summary of your project. The abstract should
follow the structured format; Introduction, Methods, Results and Conclusion. The word count
should not exceed 250 words.

Below the abstract, provide a maximum of 5 keywords.
Example: Smart assistive device; Walking stick; Elderly; Low cost; Environmental friendly.

Figures

In the text, write "Figure". Number the figures consecutively in Arabic numerals (e.g. Figure 1,
Figure 2) in the order of their first citation in the text.

13

Tables

All tables should be created using MS Word format only. Do not copy and paste from MS
Excel.

Number the tables consecutively in Arab numerals (e.g. Table 1, Table 2) in the order of their
first citation in the text.

Provide a brief title, which should be shown at the top of each table.

The table heading and text should be in 10-point Arial.

Table 1: Sample of table in the report (position is in the centre of page)

Materials Fabricate or buy Cost (RM)
Text should be in 10 point Arial Buy 50.00

Wood saddle

Citation

Description of any work produced by other research of scholar should be appropriately cited
using the APA Style.

Plagiarism

Please be advised that all reports submitted to the faculty will be screened for plagiarism/
duplication. Project report with similarity Index more than 30 percent will be rejected.

14

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PROPOSAL

Each criteria shall be assessed across 5-scale as follows:

5 – Excellent quality
4 – Good quality
3 – Requires minor improvement
2 – Requires major improvement
1 – Very poor quality
0 – Does not exhibit such quality

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LO1
Effectively pitch their product supported with fact and details.
Project title is suitable for the scope of IDP, with adequate complexity element. LO1
LO1
BACKGROUND
Complete details on the proposed idea supported with graphical aid and technical description.

RESOURCES
Valid plan on material resources, equipment, tools and scheduling.

Remark:
Full points = 15 points
Contributed 5% to the overall score.

15

EVALUATION RUBRIC

GENERAL CONDUCT

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT
2
LOGBOOK DOCUMENTATION 1 LO4
LO4
Recorded more than 7 weeks of meeting. 5 1 LO4
Excellent documentation with significant technical details.

Recorded between 5 to 7 weeks of meeting. 3
Moderate documentation with basic technical details.

Recorded less than 4 weeks of meeting. 1
Poor documentation with insignificant technical details.

Logbook is not submitted. 0

PROJECT PROGRESS

100% of 8 weeks task done. 5

≥85% of 8 weeks task done. 4

≥ 70 % of 8 weeks task done. 3

≥ 55 % of 8 weeks task done. 2

≥ 40 % of 8 weeks task done. 1

No Gantt chart OR No progress is shown 0

CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING

Able to independently identify, analyse problem and proposes 5
outstanding solution with good justification. Creative in choosing
approriate strategies in solving the problem.

Able to identify, analyse the problem and proposes common 4
solutions using effective strategies with minimum supervision.

Able to identify, analyse the problem and proposes common 3
solutions using acceptable strategies however requires extensive
supervision.

Manages to identify the problem and solutions however ineffective 2
approach.

Manages to identify the problem, however could not solve the 1
problems.

Could not identify the problems. Could not solve the problems. 0

16

DISCUSSION AND CONTRIBUTION OF IDEA 5 LO4
Effectively involve in discussion with supervisor. Students proposed 1
ideas with high degree of clarity with scientific references. 4
Discussion with supervisor that mostly started by the supervisor. LO4
Students proposed ideas with limited clarity. 3 1
Meet the requirements of effective discussion with supervisor. 2
Students proposed ideas with limited clarity. 1 LO4
Less effective discussion with supervisor. 0 2
Ineffective discussion.
No discussion. 5 LO4
4 2
COMMUNICATION AND INTERPERSONAL SKILL 3
Excellent communication with good interpersonal skill. 2
Good in communication, listen and response accordingly. 1
Meet the requirements of communication and interpersonal skills. 0
Inconsistent of communication and interpersonal skills.
Limited communication and interpersonal skills. 5
No communication at all. 4
3
ATTITUDE, COMMITMENT AND DISCIPLINE 2
Outstanding attitude, highly commited and excellent discipline. 1
Good attitude, consistent in commitment and good discipline. 0
Meet the requirements for attitude, commitment and discipline.
Inconsistent in attitude, commitment and discipline. 5
Poor attitude, less commitment and acceptable discipline.
Bad attitude, poor commitment and no discipline. 3

TEAMWORK 1
Effective delegation of task. All team members contributed and
committed to the project. Able to resolve issues professionally. 0
Moderate delegation of task. Some team members contributed and
committed to the project. Manage to resolve issue with minimal
collateral damage.
Poor delegation of task. Less than 3 team members contributed and
committed to the project. Issues within team was ignored and not
resolved.
Task delegation was not shown. Every individual work in-silo.

Remark:
Full points = 50 points
Contributed 10% to the overall score.

17

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PROTOTYPE (BMFG)

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT
2
ORIGINALITY 2 LO1
LO1
Produced a highly creative idea with clear evidence to support the 5 3 LO2
project innovation. 1 LO1

Managed to come out with a new and original idea with justification 3
to support the project innovation.

Somewhat original, but inadequate content to support the project 1
originality.

Unable to justify the project innovation. 0

PROBLEM SOLVING

Effectively resolve the problems / issues stated with complete 5
evidence on how the product resolve the issues.

Manage to resolve the problems / issues stated with justified evidence 4
on how the product resolve the issues.

Somewhat resolve the problems / issues with some justification. 3

Partially resolves the problems / issues without any justification. 2

Product does not solve any of the problems / issues stated. 0

CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE

Utilize modern engineering / IT tools to produce product with 5
outstanding quality and finishing with supported engineering analysis.

Uses some basic engineering / IT tools to produce product with good 4
quality and finishing with supported engineering analysis.

Uses general engineering / IT tools to produce product with moderate 3
quality and finishing with basic engineering analysis.

Minimal application of engineering / IT tools which resulted to poor 2
product quality and finishing without justified analysis.

No evidence on the use of engineering / IT tools and engineering 0
analysis.

DIVERSITY OF MATERIALS / PROCESSES INVOLVED

Exhibit clear diversity of materials and/or processes involved in the 5
project.

Managed to build the project with diverse materials and/or process. 3

Simple material and/or processes involved in the project. 2

No materials with inadequate process to build the project. 0

18

FUNCTIONALITY 5 LO1
4
The prototype performs its function as intended and is applicable to 3 2
real world. 2
0 LO1
The prototype somewhat performs its function as intended and is 1
applicable to real world. 5
3 LO1
The prototype exhibit minimal functionality and may be minimally 2 1
applicable to real world. 0

The prototype exhibit poor functionality and is not applicable to real 5
world. 3
0
The prototype does not function at all.

AESTHETICS

Excellent product appearance and superb finishing which appears to
be professionally constructed.

Good product appearance and finishing.

Acceptable appearance and finishing.

Not aesthetically pleasing with bad finishing (eg. corrosion,
blemishes, defects).

COMMERCIALIZATION POTENTIAL

The project has commercialization value.

The project can be commercialized but require an enhancement on the
innovation project.

No commercialisation value.

Remark:
Full points = 60 points
Contributed 20% to the overall score.

19

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PROTOTYPE (BMFI)

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT
2
ORIGINALITY 2 LO1
LO1
Produced a highly creative idea with clear evidence to support the 5 3 LO2
project innovation. 1 LO1

Managed to come out with a new and original idea with justification 3
to support the project innovation.

Somewhat original, but inadequate content to support the project 1
originality.

Unable to justify the project innovation. 0

PROBLEM SOLVING

Effectively resolve the problems / issues stated with complete 5
evidence on how the product resolve the issues.

Manage to resolve the problems / issues stated with justified evidence 4
on how the product resolve the issues.

Somewhat resolve the problems / issues with some justification. 3

Partially resolves the problems / issues without any justification. 2

Product does not solve any of the problems / issues stated. 0

CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE

Utilize modern engineering / IT tools to produce product with 5
outstanding quality and finishing with supported engineering analysis.

Uses some basic engineering / IT tools to produce product with good 4
quality and finishing with supported engineering analysis.

Uses general engineering / IT tools to produce product with moderate 3
quality and finishing with basic engineering analysis.

Minimal application of engineering / IT tools which resulted to poor 2
product quality and finishing without justified analysis.

No evidence on the use of engineering / IT tools and engineering 0
analysis.

DIVERSITY OF MATERIALS / PROCESSES INVOLVED

Exhibit clear diversity of materials and/or processes involved in the 5
project.

Managed to build the project with diverse materials and/or process. 3

Simple material and/or processes involved in the project. 2

No materials with inadequate process to build the project. 0

20

PRACTICALITY 5 LO1
The production system is practical and successfully simulated as
intended. 4 2
3
The production system is somewhat practical and successfully 2 LO1
simulated as intended. 0 1

The production system may function and simulated. 5 LO1
3 1
The production system is not practical although successfully 2
simulated. 0

The production system is not practical at all. 5
3
EFFICIENT PRODUCTION TIME 0
Highly efficient production time covering all critical processes.

Good production time covering all processes.

Acceptable production time.

Very inefficient production time.

APPLICABILITY TO INDUSTRY
The project is applicable to real-world industry.

The project can be applied to real-world industry with minor
modification.

Not applicable to industry.

Remark:
Full points = 60 points
Contributed 20% to the overall score.

21

EVALUATION RUBRIC

POSTER

* To be incorporated as interpreneurship element

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHTAGE

TITLE LO1

Title is clear, concise and accurate representation of the product. 3

Title is somewhat clear and accurate representation of the product. 2 1
Poorly selected title. 1

No title. 0

LABELS LO1

All significant details are clearly labelled. 3

Some details are labelled clearly. 2
Many details are not labelled appropriately. 1

1

Absent of important labels. 0

GRAPHICS LO1

The graphics used in the poster reflect exceptional degree of 3
creativity and technical description in their innovation.

Some of the graphics used in the poster reflect the creativity and 2 2
technical description of their innovation. 1

Some graphics are made by students, but many elements are
adopted from others.

No graphics used in the poster. 0

CONTENT LO1

Product features, development and analysis are described 3
excellently.

Product features, development and analysis are shown. 2 3
1
Product features, development and analysis are shown but needs
major improvement.

Absent of product features, development, and analysis. 0

ATTRACTIVENESS LO1

The poster is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, 3
and neatness.

The poster is attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. 2 2
The poster is acceptable in terms of design, layout, and neatness. 1

The poster is messy, poorly designed, and not attractive. 0

Remark:
Full points = 27 points
Contributed 5% to the overall score.

22

EVALUATION RUBRIC

VIDEO DEMONSTRATION

* To be incorporated as interpreneurship element

Each criteria shall be assessed across 5-scale as follows:

5 – Excellent quality
4 – Good quality
3 – Requires minor improvement
2 – Requires major improvement
1 – Very poor quality
0 – Does not exhibit such quality

EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHTAGE

IDEATION LO1

The team clearly shows how their innovation align with the problem in the
community.

The team provides evidence of the problems they are solving with facts and 1
legit data.

The team addresses the problem well.

TECHNICAL LO1

The prototype appears to be fully functional and has no noticeable issue.

The prototype is easy to use and the features are well thought out. 2

The appearance of the prototype is excellent and can be marketed instantly.

PITCH LO1

The team presents a convincing argument to support their solution.

The team’s pitch has a storyline and is well thought out. 3

The pitch is specific and to the point.

DELIVERY, VISUAL AIDS AND CREATIVITY LO1

The delivery kept audience interested throughout the demonstration.

Visual aids are reflective to the product and processes. 2

Well-formatted and visually appealing

Remark:
Full points = 150 points
Contributed 10% to the overall score.

23

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PROJECT REPORT (BMFG)

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHTAGE

PROBLEM / SCENARIO CLARIFICATION LO1

The solution to the problem requires in depth understanding of 5
engineering knowledge.

This problem is infrequently encountered where there is no
immediate solution in the market.

Problem/issue has been very clearly explained and can be solved.

Market and customer have been clearly identified.

To solve the problem requires good depth understanding of 4
engineering knowledge.

The problem is somewhat infrequent encountered where there is
no immediate solution in the market.

Problem/issue has been well explained and can be possibly
solved.

Market and customer quite clearly identified

Meet the requirements of the understanding depth for engineering 3 2
knowledge.

The problem is frequently encountered where there is a possible
solution available in the market.

The problem/issue is given but could be better written.

Market and customer have been possibly identified.

To solve the problem requires moderate depth understanding of 2
engineering knowledge.

The problem provided is not a real issue.

There is a product available in the market that can solve the stated
problem.

Not a clear problem/issue to be solved.

Minimum depth of engineering knowledge is required to solve 1
the problem

The problem provided is not an issue.

Plenty of product is available in the market can solve the stated
problem.

Absent of problem scenario. 0

OBJECTIVES AND SCOPES LO1

Excellent. Objectives and scopes are very clear and informative. 5

Good. Objectives and scopes are clear. 4

Satisfactory. Meet the requirements for objectives 3
Poor. Objectives are poorly written. 1

2

Very poor. Objectives are not relevant. 1

Absent of objectives and scopes. 0

24

PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5 LO5
Should include: 3 2
1
 Scope of work 0 LO1
 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
 Operation Breakdown Structure (OBS) 5 3
 Key Tasklist
 Project Network 4 LO2
3
All elements of project management have been included with 3
excellent clarity.
2
Acceptable elements of project management has been included 1
with moderate clarity. 0

Some elements of project management have been included but 5
difficult to understand. 3
1
No elements of project management have been included. 0

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Students have shown high creativity/innovation for the proposed
product.

Very clear and detail functionality of the proposed product
supported with excellent graphical details.

Students have shown creativity/innovation for the proposed
product.

Clear and detail functionality of the proposed product supported
with good graphical details.

Students have met the creativity/innovation for the proposed
product.

The product description is given but could be better written.
Moderate graphical details were included.

Students have meet below average creativity/innovation
requirements for the proposed product.

The product description is given but lost some information with
acceptable graphical details.

Poor creativity/innovation for the proposed product.

Poor product description and poor graphical details.

Absent of product description.

PRODUCT CONSTRUCTION

Involve more than three manufacturing processes to fabricate the
product with comprehensive details of the manufacturing process
flow. Utilize modern engineering / IT tools to produce product
with outstanding result.
Involve less than three manufacturing processes to fabricate the
product with description on the manufacturing process flow. Uses
modern engineering / IT tools to produce product with good result.
Only involve one manufacturing process to fabricate the product
with limited description on the manufacturing process flow. Uses
basic engineering / IT tools to produce product with poor result.

Absent of product construction details.

25

PROUCT ANALYSIS LO2

Engineering design analysis should include structural analysis, ergonomics consideration and design
optimization.

Students have performed all engineering design analysis and have 5
excellent deliberation on the results.

Students have performed all engineering design analysis and 4
provide a good explanation on the results.

Students have performed basic engineering design analysis and 3 4
gave moderate description on the results. 2

Students poorly performed the engineering design analysis with
vague deliberation on the results.

Students very poorly performed the engineering design analysis 1
without any deliberation on the results.

Absent of product analysis. 0 LO5
3
COST ANALYSIS
Should include:

 Variable and fixed cost of the product.
 Prototype and manufacturing costs.
 The cost benefit analysis/return of investment.

Project budget are estimated comprehensively and contains
different sub-types of costs.

Project budget are estimated briefly and contains different types of 2 4
cost. 1

Project budget are estimated insufficiently with limited types of
cost.

No cost analysis is performed. 0

SUSTAINABILITY/ENVIRONMENT/ SAFETY CONSIDERATION LO3
4
Students have considered three elements of sustainability that are 5
economy, society and environment in their project.
Detail explanation has been provided for each element. 4
3
Students have considered three elements of sustainability that are 2
economy, society and environment in their project. 1
BUT simple explanation has been given for each element.

Students only consider any two elements of the sustainability.
Moderate details have been provided on the selected elements.

Students only consider any two elements of the sustainability.
BUT simple explanation has been given for each element.

Students only consider one element of sustainability.
Poor details have been provided on the selected elements.

Absent of sustainability/environment/safety consideration. 0

26

ATTACHMENT: DRAWINGS LO1

Excellent – Detail drawing with top, side and front view complete 5
with dimension and appropriate scale. Included exploded view, 4
component design, assembly view and BOM.

Missing ONE of the above drawing requirements.

Missing TWO of the above drawing requirements. 3 3

Missing THREE of the above drawing requirements. 2

Missing more than FOUR of the above drawing requirements. 1

Absent of drawings 0

Remark:
Full points = 130 points
Contributed 40% to the overall score.

27

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PROJECT REPORT (BMFI)

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHTAGE

PROBLEM / SCENARIO CLARIFICATION LO1

The solution to the problem requires in depth understanding of 5
engineering knowledge.

This problem is infrequently encountered where there is no
immediate solution in the market.

Problem/issue has been very clearly explained and can be solved.

Market and customer have been clearly identified.

To solve the problem requires good depth understanding of 4
engineering knowledge.

The problem is somewhat infrequent encountered where there is
no immediate solution in the market.

Problem/issue has been well explained and can be possibly
solved.

Market and customer quite clearly identified

Meet the requirements of the understanding depth for engineering 3 2
knowledge.

The problem is frequently encountered where there is a possible
solution available in the market.

The problem/issue is given but could be better written.

Market and customer have been possibly identified.

To solve the problem requires moderate depth understanding of 2
engineering knowledge.

The problem provided is not a real issue.

There is a product available in the market that can solve the stated
problem.

Not a clear problem/issue to be solved.

Minimum depth of engineering knowledge is required to solve 1
the problem

The problem provided is not an issue.

Plenty of product is available in the market can solve the stated
problem.

Absent of problem scenario. 0

OBJECTIVES AND SCOPES LO1

Excellent. Objectives and scopes are very clear and informative. 5

Good. Objectives and scopes are clear. 4

Satisfactory. Meet the requirements for objectives 3
Poor. Objectives are poorly written. 1

2

Very poor. Objectives are not relevant. 1

Absent of objectives and scopes. 0

28

PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5 LO5
Should include: 3 2
1
 Scope of work 0 LO1
 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
 Operation Breakdown Structure (OBS) 5 3
 Key Tasklist
 Project Network 4 LO2
3
All elements of project management have been included with 3
excellent clarity.
2
Acceptable elements of project management has been included 1
with moderate clarity. 0

Some elements of project management have been included but 5
difficult to understand. 3
1
No elements of project management have been included. 0

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

Students have shown high creativity/innovation for the proposed
system.

Very clear and detail functionality of the proposed system
supported with excellent graphical details.

Students have shown creativity/innovation for the proposed
system.

Clear and detail functionality of the proposed system supported
with good graphical details.

Students have met the creativity/innovation for the proposed
system.

The system description is given but could be better written.
Moderate graphical details were included.

Students have meet below average creativity/innovation
requirements for the proposed system.

The system description is given but lost some information with
acceptable graphical details.

Poor creativity/innovation for the proposed system.

Poor system description and poor graphical details.

Absent of system description.

PRODUCT CONSTRUCTION

Involve more than three manufacturing processes to fabricate the
product with comprehensive details of the manufacturing process
flow. Utilize modern engineering / IT tools to produce product
with outstanding result.
Involve less than three manufacturing processes to fabricate the
product with description on the manufacturing process flow. Uses
modern engineering / IT tools to produce product with good result.
Only involve one manufacturing process to fabricate the product
with limited description on the manufacturing process flow. Uses
basic engineering / IT tools to produce product with poor result.

Absent of product construction details.

29

PRODUCT ANALYSIS LO2
Manufacturing system analysis (time, machine utilization, etc.) 4

Students have performed all industrial engineering analysis and 5 LO5
have excellent deliberation on the results. 4

Students have performed all industrial engineering analysis and 4 LO3
provide a good explanation on the results. 4

Students have performed basic industrial engineering analysis and 3
gave moderate description on the results.

Students poorly performed the industrial engineering analysis with 2
vague deliberation on the results.

Students very poorly performed the industrial engineering analysis 1
without any deliberation on the results.

Absent of industrial engineering analysis. 0
3
COST ANALYSIS
Should include:

 Variable and fixed cost of the product.
 Prototype and manufacturing costs.
 The cost benefit analysis/return of investment.

Project budget are estimated comprehensively and contains
different sub-types of costs.

Project budget are estimated briefly and contains different types of 2
cost.

Project budget are estimated insufficiently with limited types of 1
cost.

No cost analysis is performed. 0

SUSTAINABILITY/ENVIRONMENT/ SAFETY CONSIDERATION

Students have considered three elements of sustainability that are 5
economy, society and environment in their project.
Detail explanation has been provided for each element. 4
3
Students have considered three elements of sustainability that are 2
economy, society and environment in their project. 1
BUT simple explanation has been given for each element.

Students only consider any two elements of the sustainability.
Moderate details have been provided on the selected elements.

Students only consider any two elements of the sustainability.
BUT simple explanation has been given for each element.

Students only consider one element of sustainability.
Poor details have been provided on the selected elements.

Absent of sustainability/environment/safety consideration. 0

30

ATTACHMENT: LAYOUT DRAWINGS LO1
3
Excellent – Detail layout drawing with dimension and appropriate 5
scale with labelling and specification.

Missing ONE of the above drawing requirements. 4

Layout drawing shown with many missing details. 3

Absent of drawings 0

Remark:
Full points = 130 points
Contributed 40% to the overall score.

31

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PEER REVIEW

Each criteria shall be assessed across 5-scale as follows:

5 – Excellent
4 – Good
3 – Moderate
2 – Poor
1 – Very Poor
0 – Does not exhibit such quality

EVALUATION CRITERIA

COOPERATION AND COMMITMENT LO4
The person gives full cooperation and commit to all team activities

COMMUNICATION LO4

The person delivers their idea to the team effectively via all means possible (telephone, WhatsApp,
text messaging, email, live discussion, etc.)

RESPECT LO4

The person respects the other team member as individuals. Objection to opinions is reflected in a
respectful manner and does not lead to conflict.

OBJECTIVE LO4
The person completes the task given satisfactorily.

PUNCTUALITY LO4

The person respected other people’s time and is punctual during meetings, discussion, and project
work.

Remark:
Full points = 25 points
Contributed 10% to the overall score.

32

Integrated Design Committee 2022
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Pembuatan

Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

33